Majority
In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court,
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff failed to make a showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issue of fact with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim pursuant to Lien Law § 39. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion with leave to renew upon the completion of discovery (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; see also, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 ; Coppola Gen. Contr. Corp. v Noble House Constr., 224 AD2d 856 ; Matter of Upstate Bldrs. Supply Corp. [Maple Knoll Apts.], 37 AD2d 901 ). Ritter, J. P., Joy, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center 64 NY2d 851 p. 749