Majority
Order, Supreme
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request for an exemption from sex offender registration for his conviction of unlawful surveillance under Penal Law § 250.45 (3). Although an exemption for such a conviction may be available if “registration would be unduly harsh and inappropriate” (Correction Law § 168-a [2] [e]), defendant has not made such a showing. The circumstances of the surveillance were repulsive, and they raise concerns about defendant’s character and potential for recidivism. Furthermore, he has an extensive criminal record including crimes of violence.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.