Majority
— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), dated May 11, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In determining a defendant’s risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), a downward departure from a sex offender’s presumptive risk level generally is warranted only where there exists a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary (2006) (hereinafter the Guidelines) (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 , 861 [2014]; People v Sanchez, 138 AD3d 946 [2016]; People v Azeez, 138 AD3d 945 [2016]).
Here, nearly all of the mitigating circumstances identified by
Chambers, J.P., Dickerson, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Gillotti 23 NY3d 841 at 861 p. 697
- People v. Sanchez 138 AD3d 946 p. 697
- People v. DeDona 102 AD3d 58 at 71 p. 698