p. 1325The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Symonds, Appellant.Appeal from an order of the Livingston County Court (Robert B. Wiggins, J.), entered March 5, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court erred in granting an upward departure from his presumptive classification as a level one risk. We reject that contention. It is well settled that a court may grant an upward
p. 1326departure from a sex offender’s presumptive risk level when the People establish, by clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n [3];
People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 , 861-862 [2014]), the existence of “an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 4 [2006];
see People v Shepard, 103 AD3d 1224 , 1224 [2013],
lv denied 21 NY3d 856 [2013];
People v Wheeler, 59 AD3d 1007 , 1008 [2009],
lv denied 12 NY3d 711 [2009]). Here, there is clear and convincing evidence of “defendant’s exploitation of his relationship of trust with the victim [ ]” over a period of more than a year
(People v Botindari, 107 AD3d 1607 , 1608 [2013]), which constituted an aggravating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines
(see People v Mantilla, 70 AD3d 477 , 478 [2010],
lv denied 15 NY3d 706 [2010];
People v Hill, 50 AD3d 990 , 991 [2008],
lv denied 11 NY3d 701 [2008];
People v Ferrer, 35 AD3d 297 , 297 [2006],
lv denied 8 NY3d 807 [2007]).
Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, DeJoseph and Curran, JJ.