Majority
Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (David W. Foley, A.J.), dated June 20, 2016. The order denied defendant’s motion seeking that he be released from the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In 2005, defendant was adjudicated a level one risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). In 2016, he moved pursuant to sections 168-h (1) and 168-o (1) to be released from the SORA registration requirements, and he appeals from an order denying that motion. We affirm.
Defendant is “ineligible for relief from SORA’s registration requirements, as he has not been registered for at least 30 years” (People v Pero, 49 AD3d 1010 , 1011 [2008]; see People v Shim, 139 AD3d 68 , 72 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 910 [2016];
Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Scudder, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Pero 49 AD3d 1010 at 1011 p. 1650
- People v. Shim 139 AD3d 68 at 72 p. 1650
- People v. Kindred 71 AD3d 1418 at 1418 p. 1651
- Doe v. O'Donnell 86 AD3d 238 at 242 p. 1651
- People v. Melzer 89 AD3d 1000 at 1001 p. 1651
- Pelaez v. Silverstone 19 NY3d 954 p. 1651
- People v. Jewell 119 AD3d 1446 at 1448 p. 1651
- People v. McKeehan 2 AD3d 1421 at 1422 p. 1651