People v. Copeland

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), dated September 6, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him as a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s designation of him as a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The County Court properly assessed 25 points under risk factor two and 20 points under risk factor four (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 9-10 [2006]). The victim’s sworn statement and the presentence report, offered by the People at the SORA hearing, constituted “reliable hearsay” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]; see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563 , 573-574 [2009] ), and provided a sufficient basis for the assessment of those points (see People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406 , 408-409 [2010] ; People v Johnson, 77 AD3d 897 [2010]).

Moreover, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for a downward departure, as the defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of a mitigating factor “of a kind, or to a degree,

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Charache, 9 NY3d 829 , 830 [2007]; People v McElhearn, 56 AD3d 978 , 979 [2008]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.