← Cases

Palomini v. Puglisi

91 A.D.3d 736 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 2012-01-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 736
Janique Palomini, Respondent, v Eileen Puglisi et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[936 NYS2d 568]

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion pursuant to CPDR 3216 to dismiss the complaint as the plaintiff demonstrated a justifiable excuse for her delay in filing a note of issue, as well as the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499 , 503 [1997]; Kadyimov v

p. 737
Mackinnon, 82 AD3d 938 [2011]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cases cited