Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co. 216 N.Y. 763

← Cases

Claim of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co.

216 N.Y. 763 Court N.Y. Decision date 1916-01-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 763
In the Matter of the Claim of Mike Valentine, Respondent, against Smith, Angevine & Co. (Incorporated) et al., Appellants.

Headnote

Matter of Valentine v. Smith, Angevine & Co., Inc., 168 App. Div. 403 , affirmed.
(Argued November 15, 1915;
decided January 11, 1916.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial
p. 764
department, entered May 10, 1915, affirming an award of the workmen’s compensation commission for injuries received by the claimant while working in the state of Connecticut. At the hearing objection to award of compensation was made upon the ground that the accident happened without the state.'
Merwyn H. Nellis, Andrew J. Nellis and James B. Henney for appellants.
Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent. ■

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Matter of Post v. Burger & Gohlke ( 216 N. Y. 544 ).

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.

Cases cited