Reichle v. Perkins

Louis Reichle became a member of the labor organization known as Cigarmakers’ International Union of America, through membership in Local Union No. 2, on or about February 23, 1889. As such he became entitled to certain privileges in the way of providing that a person should receive a death benefit as hereinafter indicated. On November 26, 1915, he became insane and was committed to the Buffalo State Hospital, where he remained until he died on October 23, 1918. At the time of his death he was in good standing as a member of the union. He was unmarried and childless. He left two sisters, Lena J. Reichle, the plaintiff, and Mrs. Egan, his only heirs and next of kin. Lena J. Reichle was appointed administratrix of his estate and letters of administration were issued to her by the Surrogate’s Court of Erie county on November 14, 1918. On January 24, 1919, she served notice, as such administratrix, upon the union and 'demanded payment to her of the sum of $550, claiming to be entitled thereto under the terms of the decedent’s membership as indicated by the constitution of the union. The defendant refused to pay on the ground that the plaintiff was not a person

The question is as to the construction of the constitution of the defendant. It is not disputed that upon the death of decedent the sum of $50 should be paid to such person or persons as shall have paid the funeral expenses of such deceased member. Plaintiff, as such administratrix, paid the funeral expenses and is entitled to collect the $50. The constitution further provides, however, as follows:

“ Sec. 144. Including the fifty dollars funeral or cremation expenses, there shall be paid upon the death of a member the following sums, viz.: If the decedent shall have been a member continuously for five years or longer period less than ten years next preceding his death, the sum of two hundred dollars. If the decedent shall have been such member continuously for ten years or longer period less than fifteen years next preceding his death, the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars. If the decedent shall have been such member continuously for fifteen years or longer period next preceding his death, the sum of five hundred and fifty dollars.”

The person to whom this payment is to be made may be indicated as provided by section 144-c which reads as follows:

“ Sec. 144-c. A member may at any time designate the person or persons to whom his death benefit shall be paid. Such designation shall be in writing, signed by such member and witnessed by the Secretary of the local union to which such member then belongs or by two other credible persons, and such member may at any time ■ thereafter in like manner change such designation. If there be no such designation or if the paper making such

The deceased at no time designated a person or persons to whom his death benefit should be paid. He left no widow or minor children and it does not appear that he left any relatives who as matter of law at the time of

The construction placed upon section 144-c by the courts below reflects credit on the disposition of the learned judges to avoid a forfeiture if possible, but its proper meaning according to the intention of the parties seems reasonably plain. Reichle had been a member of the union for twenty-nine years and eight months. He had during those years the right to designate a beneficiary, even by his last will.’ If he had married and left a widow or minor children, or even if he- had left dependent relatives, ipso facto they became his beneficiaries under the terms of the constitution. The necessary inference is, however, that neither his estate nor his next of kin nor his creditors would be entitled to receive the death benefit provided for. Thus to construe the constitution of the union does not shock the conscience nor call upon the courts to enlarge simple language in order to make a more advantageous contract for the members. The constitution contains two distinct requirements: First, that the death benefit be paid only to a designated beneficiary, a widow, minor children or dependent relative; and, secondly, that application in writing for the payment of the death benefit shall be made by one entitled thereto within one year after the death of such member. If there is no designated beneficiary, widow, minor child or dependent relative to make the application it follows that it cannot be made within one year next after the death of the member and that all claim and right to such benefit shall thereupon wholly cease and determine. The language of section 144-c might be made more apt by expressing affirmatively what is put in negative terms, but the meaning is clear. A careful examination of the other sections of the constitution reveals no purpose on the part of the defendant to permit an application to be made except as heretofore indicated. The parties had a right to make this agreement. (Born v. Perkins, 173 App. Div. 214 ; affd.,

The judgment appealed from should be modified in accordance with opinion, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs.

Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Orante and Andrews, JJ., concur; His cock, Ch. J., absent.

Judgment accordingly.