Majority
Prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in allowing the prosecution to exploit the fact that defendant had not told the police, the Judge, the District Attorney and the Grand Jury that he was not driving his car at the time he was so charged, but that it had been driven by someone else. Defendant was under no duty to speak when in the custody of the authorities, and his failure to do so cannot be the basis of an inference of guilt on his part (People v. Rutigliano, 261 N. Y. 103 , 106-107; People v. Dolce, 261 N. Y. 108 ; People v. Travato, 309 N. Y. 382 , 386; People v. Namer, 309 N. Y. 458 , 464; People v. Hyman, 308 N. Y. 794 ; People v. Allen, 300 N. Y. 222 , 225; People v. Abel, 298 N. Y. 333 ; People v. Mleczko, 298 N. Y. 153 ; People v. Pignataro, 263 N. Y. 229 ).
Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fkoessel, Van Voorhis and Burke concur.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.
Cases cited
- People v. Rutigliano 261 N. Y. 103 at 106-107 p. 993
- People v. Dolce 261 N. Y. 108 p. 993
- People v. Travato 309 N. Y. 382 at 386 p. 993
- People v. Namer 309 N. Y. 458 at 464 p. 993
- People v. Hyman 308 N. Y. 794 p. 993
- People v. Allen 300 N. Y. 222 at 225 p. 993
- People v. Abel 298 N. Y. 333 p. 993
- People v. Mleczko 298 N. Y. 153 p. 993
- People v. Pignataro 263 N. Y. 229 p. 993