Hyperlawhypertext legal database Brickman v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 58 N.Y.2d 639

← Cases

Brickman v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

58 N.Y.2d 639 Court N.Y. Decision date 1982-11-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 639
Herbert L. Brickman, Appellant-Respondent, v F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent-Appellant.
Argued October 4, 1982;
decided November 16, 1982
p. 642
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Raymond, T. Munsell, Paul Windells, Jr., and Kenneth W. Greenawalt for appellant.
Jon Paul Robbins and Herbert L. Brickman, pro se, for Herbert L. Brickman, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On defendant’s appeal: Order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division on the earlier appeal ( 66 AD2d 737 -740).

On plaintiff’s appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, as academic in view of the disposition made on defendant’s appeal.

Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.

Cases cited