← Cases

People v. Rodriguez

21 N.Y.3d 1030 Court N.Y. Decision date 2013-08-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1030
[995 NE2d 178, 972 NYS2d 215]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.
Decided August 27, 2013
p. 1031
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Lisa A. Packard of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Patricia Curran of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days’ notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument

p. 1032
that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is similarly unreviewable.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Statutes and regulations cited