PART 1 General Provisions
TITLE A Short Title, Applicability and Definitions
ARTICLE 1 Short Title, Applicability and Definitions
Short title.
This chapter shall be known as the criminal procedure law, and may be
cited as "CPL".
Applicability of chapter to actions and matter occurring before
and after effective date.
1. The provisions of this chapter apply exclusively to:
(a) All criminal actions and proceedings commenced upon or after the
effective date thereof and all appeals and other post-judgment
proceedings relating or attaching thereto; and
(b) All matters of criminal procedure prescribed in this chapter
which do not constitute a part of any particular action or case,
occurring upon or after such effective date.
2. The provisions of this chapter apply to (a) all criminal actions
and proceedings commenced prior to the effective date thereof but still
pending on such date, and (b) all appeals and other post-judgment
proceedings commenced upon or after such effective date which relate or
attach to criminal actions and proceedings commenced or concluded prior
to such effective date; provided that, if application of such provisions
in any particular case would not be feasible or would work injustice,
the provisions of the code of criminal procedure apply thereto.
3. The provisions of this chapter do not impair or render ineffectual
any proceedings or procedural matters which occurred prior to the
effective date thereof.
Definitions of terms of general use in this chapter.
Except where different meanings are expressly specified in subsequent
provisions of this chapter, the term definitions contained in section
10.00 of the penal law are applicable to this chapter, and, in addition,
the following terms have the following meanings:
1. "Accusatory instrument" means: (a) an indictment, an indictment
ordered reduced pursuant to subdivision one-a of section 210.20 of this
chapter, an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information, a superior court information, a misdemeanor complaint or a
felony complaint. Every accusatory instrument, regardless of the person
designated therein as accuser, constitutes an accusation on behalf of
the state as plaintiff and must be entitled "the people of the state of
New York" against a designated person, known as the defendant; and
(b) an appearance ticket issued for a parking infraction when (i) such
ticket is based on personal knowledge or information and belief of the
police officer or other public servant who issues the ticket, (ii) the
police officer or other public servant who issues such ticket verifies
that false statements made therein are punishable as a class A
misdemeanor, (iii) the infraction or infractions contained therein are
stated in detail and not in conclusory terms so as to provide the
defendant with sufficient notice including, but not limited, to the
applicable provision of law allegedly violated, and the date, time and
particular place of the alleged infraction, and (iv) such ticket
contains: (1) the license plate designation of the ticketed vehicle, (2)
the license plate type of the ticketed vehicle, (3) the expiration of
the ticketed vehicle's registration, (4) the make or model of the
ticketed vehicle, and (5) the body type of the ticketed vehicle,
provided, however, that where the plate type or the expiration date are
not shown on either the registration plates or sticker of a vehicle or
where the registration sticker is covered, faded, defaced or mutilated
so that it is unreadable, the plate type or the expiration date may be
omitted, provided, further, however, that such condition must be so
described and inserted on the instrument.
2. "Local criminal court accusatory instrument" means any accusatory
instrument other than an indictment or a superior court information.
3. "Indictment" means a written accusation by a grand jury, more fully
defined and described in article two hundred, filed with a superior
court, which charges one or more defendants with the commission of one
or more offenses, at least one of which is a crime, and which serves as
a basis for prosecution thereof.
3-a. "Superior court information" means a written accusation by a
district attorney more fully defined and described in articles one
hundred ninety-five and two hundred, filed with a superior court
pursuant to article one hundred ninety-five, which charges one or more
defendants with the commission of one or more offenses, at least one of
which is a crime, and which serves as a basis for prosecution thereof.
4. "Information" means a verified written accusation by a person, more
fully defined and described in article one hundred, filed with a local
criminal court, which charges one or more defendants with the commission
of one or more offenses, none of which is a felony, and which may serve
both to commence a criminal action and as a basis for prosecution
thereof.
* 5. "Simplified traffic information" means a written accusation, more
fully defined and described in article one hundred, by a police officer
or other public servant authorized by law to issue same, filed with a
local criminal court, which, being in a brief or simplified form
prescribed by the commissioner of motor vehicles, charges a person with
one or more traffic infractions or misdemeanors relating to traffic, and
which may serve both to commence a criminal action for such offense and
as a basis for prosecution thereof.
* NB There are 2 sb 5's -- cannot be put together
* 5. (a) "Simplified information" means a simplified traffic
information, a simplified parks information, or a simplified
environmental conservation information.
(b) "Simplified traffic information" means a written accusation by a
police officer, or other public servant authorized by law to issue same,
more fully defined and described in article one hundred, filed with a
local criminal court, which, being in a brief or simplified form
prescribed by the commissioner of motor vehicles, charges a person with
one or more traffic infractions or misdemeanors relating to traffic, and
which may serve both to commence a criminal action for such offense and
as a basis for prosecution thereof.
(c) "Simplified parks information" means a written accusation by a
police officer, or other public servant authorized by law to issue same,
filed with a local criminal court, which, being in a brief or simplified
form prescribed by the commissioner of parks and recreation, charges a
person with one or more offenses, other than a felony, for which a
uniform simplified parks information may be issued pursuant to the parks
and recreation law and the navigation law, and which may serve both to
commence a criminal action for such offense and as a basis for
prosecution thereof.
(d) "Simplified environmental conservation information" means a
written accusation by a police officer, or other public servant
authorized by law to issue same, filed with a local criminal court,
which being in a brief or simplified form prescribed by the commissioner
of environmental conservation, charges a person with one or more
offenses, other than a felony, for which a uniform simplified
environmental conservation simplified information may be issued pursuant
to the environmental conservation law, and which may serve both to
commence a criminal action for such offense and as a basis for
prosecution thereof.
* NB There are 2 sb 5's -- cannot be put together
6. "Prosecutor's information" means a written accusation by a district
attorney, more fully defined and described in article one hundred, filed
with a local criminal court, which charges one or more defendants with
the commission of one or more offenses, none of which is a felony, and
which serves as a basis for prosecution thereof.
7. "Misdemeanor complaint" means a verified written accusation by a
person, more fully defined and described in article one hundred, filed
with a local criminal court, which charges one or more defendants with
the commission of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a
misdemeanor and none of which is a felony, and which serves to commence
a criminal action but which may not, except upon the defendant's
consent, serve as a basis for prosecution of the offenses charged
therein.
8. "Felony complaint" means a verified written accusation by a person,
more fully defined and described in article one hundred, filed with a
local criminal court, which charges one or more defendants with the
commission of one or more felonies and which serves to commence a
criminal action but not as a basis for prosecution thereof.
9. "Arraignment" means the occasion upon which a defendant against
whom an accusatory instrument has been filed appears before the court in
which the criminal action is pending for the purpose of having such
court acquire and exercise control over his person with respect to such
accusatory instrument and of setting the course of further proceedings
in the action.
10. "Plea," in addition to its ordinary meaning as prescribed in
sections 220.10 and 340.20, means, where appropriate, the occasion upon
which a defendant enters such a plea to an accusatory instrument.
11. "Trial." A jury trial commences with the selection of the jury and
includes all further proceedings through the rendition of a verdict. A
non-jury trial commences with the first opening address, if there be
any, and, if not, when the first witness is sworn, and includes all
further proceedings through the rendition of a verdict.
12. "Verdict" means the announcement by a jury in the case of a jury
trial, or by the court in the case of a non-jury trial, of its decision
upon the defendant's guilt or innocence of the charges submitted to or
considered by it.
13. "Conviction" means the entry of a plea of guilty to, or a verdict
of guilty upon, an accusatory instrument other than a felony complaint,
or to one or more counts of such instrument.
14. "Sentence" means the imposition and entry of sentence upon a
conviction.
15. "Judgment." A judgment is comprised of a conviction and the
sentence imposed thereon and is completed by imposition and entry of the
sentence.
16. "Criminal action." A criminal action (a) commences with the filing
of an accusatory instrument against a defendant in a criminal court, as
specified in subdivision seventeen; (b) includes the filing of all
further accusatory instruments directly derived from the initial one,
and all proceedings, orders and motions conducted or made by a criminal
court in the course of disposing of any such accusatory instrument, or
which, regardless of the court in which they occurred or were made,
could properly be considered as a part of the record of the case by an
appellate court upon an appeal from a judgment of conviction; and (c)
terminates with the imposition of sentence or some other final
disposition in a criminal court of the last accusatory instrument filed
in the case.
17. "Commencement of criminal action." A criminal action is commenced
by the filing of an accusatory instrument against a defendant in a
criminal court, and, if more than one accusatory instrument is filed in
the course of the action, it commences when the first of such
instruments is filed.
18. "Criminal proceeding" means any proceeding which (a) constitutes a
part of a criminal action or (b) occurs in a criminal court and is
related to a prospective, pending or completed criminal action, either
of this state or of any other jurisdiction, or involves a criminal
investigation.
19. "Criminal court" means any court defined as such by section 10.10.
20. "Superior court" means any court defined as such by subdivision
two of section 10.10.
21. "Local criminal court" means any court defined as such by
subdivision three of section 10.10.
22. "Intermediate appellate court" means any court possessing
appellate jurisdiction, other than the court of appeals.
23. "Judge" means any judicial officer who is a member of or
constitutes a court, whether referred to in another provision of law as
a justice or by any other title.
24. "Trial jurisdiction." A criminal court has "trial jurisdiction" of
an offense when an indictment or an information charging such offense
may properly be filed with such court, and when such court has authority
to accept a plea to, try or otherwise finally dispose of such accusatory
instrument.
25. "Preliminary jurisdiction." A criminal court has "preliminary
jurisdiction" of an offense when, regardless of whether it has trial
jurisdiction thereof, a criminal action for such offense may be
commenced therein, and when such court may conduct proceedings with
respect thereto which lead or may lead to prosecution and final
disposition of the action in a court having trial jurisdiction thereof.
26. "Appearance ticket" means a written notice issued by a public
servant, more fully defined in section 150.10, requiring a person to
appear before a local criminal court in connection with an accusatory
instrument to be filed against him therein.
27. "Summons" means a process of a local criminal court or superior
court, more fully defined in section 130.10, requiring a defendant to
appear before such court for the purpose of arraignment upon an
accusatory instrument filed therewith by which a criminal action against
him has been commenced.
28. "Warrant of arrest" means a process of a local criminal court,
more fully defined in section 120.10, directing a police officer to
arrest a defendant and to bring him before such court for the purpose of
arraignment upon an accusatory instrument filed therewith by which a
criminal action against him has been commenced.
29. "Superior court warrant of arrest" means a process of a superior
court directing a police officer to arrest a defendant and to bring him
before such court for the purpose of arraignment upon an indictment
filed therewith by which a criminal action against him has been
commenced.
30. "Bench warrant" means a process of a criminal court in which a
criminal action is pending, directing a police officer, or a uniformed
court officer, pursuant to paragraph b of subdivision two of section
530.70 of this chapter, to take into custody a defendant in such action
who has previously been arraigned upon the accusatory instrument by
which the action was commenced, and to bring him before such court. The
function of a bench warrant is to achieve the court appearance of a
defendant in a pending criminal action for some purpose other than his
initial arraignment in the action.
31. "Prosecutor" means a district attorney or any other public servant
who represents the people in a criminal action.
32. "District attorney" means a district attorney, an assistant
district attorney or a special district attorney, and, where
appropriate, the attorney general, an assistant attorney general, a
deputy attorney general, a special deputy attorney general, or the
special prosecutor and inspector general for the protection of people
with special needs or his or her assistants when acting pursuant to
their duties in matters arising under article twenty of the executive
law, or the inspector general of New York for transportation or his or
her deputies when acting pursuant to article four-B of the executive
law.
33. "Peace officer" means a person listed in section 2.10 of this
chapter.
34. "Police officer." The following persons are police officers:
(a) A sworn member of the division of state police;
(b) Sheriffs, under-sheriffs and deputy sheriffs of counties outside
of New York City where such department is certified in accordance with
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred forty-six-h of
the executive law;
(c) A sworn officer of an authorized county or county parkway police
department where such department is certified in accordance with
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred forty-six-h of
the executive law;
(d) A sworn officer of an authorized police department or force of a
city, town, village or police district where such department or force is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(e) A sworn officer of an authorized police department of an authority
or a sworn officer of the state regional park police in the office of
parks and recreation where such department or force is certified in
accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight
hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(f) A sworn officer of the capital police force of the office of
general services where such force is certified in accordance with
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred forty-six-h of
the executive law;
(g) An investigator employed in the office of a district attorney;
(h) An investigator employed by the New York Waterfront Commission or
a commission created by an interstate compact who is, to a substantial
extent, engaged in the enforcement of the criminal laws of this state;
(i) The chief and deputy fire marshals, the supervising fire marshals
and the fire marshals of the bureau of fire investigation of the New
York City fire department;
(j) A sworn officer of the division of law enforcement in the
department of environmental conservation where such division is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(k) A sworn officer of the New York Waterfront Commission or a police
force of a public authority created by an interstate compact where such
force is certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one
of section eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(m) A special investigator employed in the statewide organized crime
task force, while performing his assigned duties pursuant to section
seventy-a of the executive law.
(n) A sworn officer of the Westchester county department of public
safety services who, on or prior to June thirtieth, nineteen hundred
seventy-nine was appointed as a sworn officer of the division of
Westchester county parkway police or who was appointed on or after July
first, nineteen hundred seventy-nine to the title of police officer,
sergeant, lieutenant, captain or inspector or who, on or prior to
January thirty-first, nineteen hundred eighty-three, was appointed as a
Westchester county deputy sheriff.
(o) A sworn officer of the New York city department of environmental
protection police, employed by the city of New York, appointed to
protect the sources, works, and transmission of water supplied to the
city of New York, and to protect persons on or in the vicinity of such
water sources, works, and transmission where such department is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(p) Persons appointed as railroad police officers pursuant to section
eighty-eight of the railroad law where such department or force is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(q) An employee of the department of taxation and finance (i) assigned
to enforcement of the taxes imposed under or pursuant to the authority
of article twelve-A of the tax law and administered by the commissioner
of taxation and finance, taxes imposed under or pursuant to the
authority of article eighteen of the tax law and administered by the
commissioner, taxes imposed under article twenty of the tax law, or
sales or compensating use taxes relating to petroleum products or
cigarettes imposed under article twenty-eight or pursuant to the
authority of article twenty-nine of the tax law and administered by the
commissioner or (ii) designated as a revenue crimes specialist and
assigned to the enforcement of the taxes described in paragraph (c) of
subdivision four of section 2.10 of this title, for the purpose of
applying for and executing search warrants under article six hundred
ninety of this chapter, for the purpose of acting as a claiming agent
under article thirteen-A of the civil practice law and rules in
connection with the enforcement of the taxes referred to above and for
the purpose of executing warrants of arrest relating to the respective
crimes specified in subdivision four of section 2.10 of this title.
(r) Any employee of the Suffolk county department of parks who is
appointed as a Suffolk county park police officer.
(s) A university police officer appointed by the state university
pursuant to paragraph 1 of subdivision two of section three hundred
fifty-five of the education law where such department or force is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(t) A sworn officer of the department of public safety of the Buffalo
municipal housing authority who has achieved or been granted the status
of sworn police officer and has been certified by the division of
criminal justice services as successfully completing an approved basic
course for police officers.
(u) Persons appointed as Indian police officers pursuant to section
one hundred fourteen of the Indian law where such department or force is
certified in accordance with paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section
eight hundred forty-six-h of the executive law;
(v) Supervisor of forest ranger services; assistant supervisor of
forest ranger services; forest ranger 3; forest ranger 2; forest ranger
1 employed by the state department of environmental conservation or
sworn officer of the division of forest protection and fire management
in the department of environmental conservation responsible for wild
land search and rescue, wild land fire management in the state as
prescribed in subdivision eighteen of section 9-0105 and title eleven of
article nine of the environmental conservation law, exercising care,
custody and control of state lands administered by the department of
environmental conservation.
34-a. "Geographical area of employment." The "geographical area of
employment" of certain police officers is as follows:
* (a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this subdivision, New
York state constitutes the "geographical area of employment" of any
police officer employed as such by an agency of the state or by an
authority which functions throughout the state, or a police officer
designated by the superintendent of state police pursuant to section two
hundred twenty-three of the executive law;
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* (a) Except as provided in paragraph (d), New York state constitutes
the "geographical area of employment" of any police officer employed as
such by an agency of the state or by an authority which functions
throughout the state;
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
(b) A county, city, town or village, as the case may be, constitutes
the "geographical area of employment" of any police officer employed as
such by an agency of such political subdivision or by an authority which
functions only in such political subdivision; and
(c) Where an authority functions in more than one county, the
"geographical area of employment" of a police officer employed thereby
extends through all of such counties.
(d) The geographical area of employment of a police officer appointed
by the state university is the campuses and other property of the state
university, including any portion of a public highway which crosses or
abuts such property.
(e) The geographical area of employment of a police officer appointed
pursuant to section one hundred fourteen of the Indian law is within the
county of Franklin, and within that county, only within the boundary of
the St. Regis reservation, except that if the superintendent of state
police has certified such officer with expanded jurisdiction within the
county of Franklin, pursuant to subdivision eight-a of such section, the
geographical area of employment of such police officer shall also
include the area of expanded jurisdiction set forth in that subdivision.
35. "Commitment to the custody of the sheriff," when referring to an
order of a court located in a county or city which has established a
department of correction, means commitment to the commissioner of
correction of such county or city.
36. "County" ordinarily means (a) any county outside of New York City
or (b) New York City in its entirety. Unless the context requires a
different construction, New York City, despite its five counties, is
deemed a single county within the meaning of the provisions of this
chapter in which that term appears.
37. "Lesser included offense." When it is impossible to commit a
particular crime without concomitantly committing, by the same conduct,
another offense of lesser grade or degree, the latter is, with respect
to the former, a "lesser included offense." In any case in which it is
legally possible to attempt to commit a crime, an attempt to commit such
crime constitutes a lesser included offense with respect thereto.
38. "Oath" includes an affirmation and every other mode authorized by
law of attesting to the truth of that which is stated.
39. "Petty offense" means a violation or a traffic infraction.
40. "Evidence in chief" means evidence, received at a trial or other
criminal proceeding in which a defendant's guilt or innocence of an
offense is in issue, which may be considered as a part of the quantum of
substantive proof establishing or tending to establish the commission of
such offense or an element thereof or the defendant's connection
therewith.
41. "Armed felony" means any violent felony offense defined in section
70.02 of the penal law that includes as an element either:
(a) possession, being armed with or causing serious physical injury by
means of a deadly weapon, if the weapon is a loaded weapon from which a
shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious physical
injury may be discharged; or
(b) display of what appears to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun,
machine gun or other firearm.
42. "Juvenile offender" means (1) a person, thirteen years old who is
criminally responsible for acts constituting murder in the second degree
as defined in subdivisions one and two of section 125.25 of the penal
law, or such conduct as a sexually motivated felony, where authorized
pursuant to section 130.91 of the penal law; and (2) a person fourteen
or fifteen years old who is criminally responsible for acts constituting
the crimes defined in subdivisions one and two of section 125.25 (murder
in the second degree) and in subdivision three of such section provided
that the underlying crime for the murder charge is one for which such
person is criminally responsible; section 135.25 (kidnapping in the
first degree); 150.20 (arson in the first degree); subdivisions one and
two of section 120.10 (assault in the first degree); 125.20
(manslaughter in the first degree); paragraphs (a) and (b) of
subdivision one, paragraphs (a) and (b) of subdivision two and
paragraphs (a) and (b) of subdivision three of section 130.35 (rape in
the first degree); former subdivisions one and two of section 130.35
(rape in the first degree); subdivisions one and two of former section
130.50; 130.70 (aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree); 140.30
(burglary in the first degree); subdivision one of section 140.25
(burglary in the second degree); 150.15 (arson in the second degree);
160.15 (robbery in the first degree); subdivision two of section 160.10
(robbery in the second degree) of the penal law; or section 265.03 of
the penal law, where such machine gun or such firearm is possessed on
school grounds, as that phrase is defined in subdivision fourteen of
section 220.00 of the penal law; or defined in the penal law as an
attempt to commit murder in the second degree or kidnapping in the first
degree, or such conduct as a sexually motivated felony, where authorized
pursuant to section 130.91 of the penal law.
43. "Judicial hearing officer" means a person so designated pursuant
to provisions of article twenty-two of the judiciary law.
44. "Adolescent offender" means a person charged with a felony
committed on or after October first, two thousand eighteen when he or
she was sixteen years of age or on or after October first, two thousand
nineteen, when he or she was seventeen years of age.
45. "Expunge" means, where an arrest and any enforcement activity
connected with that arrest, including prosecution and any disposition in
any New York state court, is deemed a nullity and the accused is
restored, in contemplation of the law, to the status such individual
occupied before the arrest, prosecution and/or disposition; that records
of such arrest, prosecution and/or disposition shall be marked as
expunged or shall be destroyed as set forth in section 160.50 of this
chapter. Neither the arrest nor prosecution and/or disposition, if any,
of a matter deemed a nullity shall operate as a disqualification of any
person so accused to pursue or engage in any lawful activity,
occupation, profession or calling. Except where specifically required or
permitted by statute or upon specific authorization of a superior court,
no such person shall be required to divulge information pertaining to
the arrest, prosecution and/or disposition of such a matter.
ARTICLE 2 Peace Officers
Persons designated as peace officers.
Notwithstanding the provisions of any general, special or local law or
charter to the contrary, only the following persons shall have the
powers of, and shall be peace officers:
1. Constables or police constables of a town or village, provided such
designation is not inconsistent with local law.
2. The sheriff, undersheriff and deputy sheriffs of New York city and
sworn officers of the Westchester county department of public safety
services appointed after January thirty-first, nineteen hundred
eighty-three to the title of public safety officer and who perform the
functions previously performed by a Westchester county deputy sheriff on
or prior to such date.
3. Investigators of the office of the state commission of
investigation.
4. Employees of the department of taxation and finance designated by
the commissioner of taxation and finance as peace officers and assigned
by the commissioner of taxation and finance (a) to the enforcement of
any of the criminal or seizure and forfeiture provisions of the tax law
relating to (i) taxes imposed under or pursuant to the authority of
article twelve-A of the tax law and administered by the commissioner,
(ii) taxes imposed under or pursuant to the authority of article
eighteen of the tax law and administered by the commissioner, (iii)
taxes imposed under article twenty of the tax law, or (iv) sales or
compensating use taxes relating to petroleum products or cigarettes
imposed under article twenty-eight or pursuant to the authority of
article twenty-nine of the tax law and administered by the commissioner
or
(b) to the enforcement of any provision of the penal law relating to
any of the taxes described in paragraph (a) of this subdivision and
relating to crimes effected through the use of a statement or document
filed with the department in connection with the administration of such
taxes or
(c) as revenue crimes specialist and assigned to the enforcement of
any of the criminal provisions of the tax law relating to taxes
administered by the commissioner of taxation and finance other than
those taxes set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision or any
provision of the penal law relating to such taxes, and those provisions
of the penal law (i) relating to any of the foregoing taxes and (ii)
relating to crimes effected through the use of a statement or document
filed with the department in connection with the administration of such
foregoing taxes or
(d) to the enforcement of any provision of law which is subject to
enforcement by criminal penalties and which relates to the performance
by persons employed by the department of taxation and finance of the
duties of their employment.
Provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize any such employee designated as a peace officer after November
first, nineteen hundred eighty-five to carry, possess, repair or dispose
of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law, and further provided that,
prior to such designation by the commissioner each such employee shall
have successfully completed the training requirements specified in
section 2.30 of this article. Provided, further, that any license issued
to such employee pursuant to such peace officer designation by the
commissioner shall relate only to the firearm issued to such employee by
the department of taxation and finance and such permit shall not cover
any other firearms. The foregoing sentence shall not be deemed to
prohibit such peace officer from applying for a separate permit relating
to non-departmental firearms.
5. Employees of the New York city department of finance assigned to
enforcement of the tax on cigarettes imposed by title D of chapter
forty-six of the administrative code of the city of New York by the
commissioner of finance.
6. Confidential investigators and inspectors, as designated by the
commissioner, of the department of agriculture and markets, pursuant to
rules of the department.
7. Officers or agents of a duly incorporated society for the
prevention of cruelty to animals.
* 7-a. Officers or agents of a duly incorporated society for the
prevention of cruelty to children in Rockland county; provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
officer or agent to carry, possess, repair, or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law; and provided further that such officer
or agent shall exercise the powers of a peace officer only when he is
acting pursuant to his special duties.
* NB Repealed August 11, 2027
8. Inspectors and officers of the New York city department of health
when acting pursuant to their special duties as set forth in section
564-11.0 of the administrative code of the city of New York; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
9. Park rangers in Suffolk county, who shall be authorized to issue
appearance tickets, simplified traffic informations, simplified parks
informations and simplified environmental conservation informations.
10. Broome county park rangers who shall be authorized to issue
appearance tickets, simplified traffic informations, simplified parks
informations, and simplified environmental conservation informations;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
11. Park rangers in Onondaga and Cayuga counties, who shall be
authorized to issue appearance tickets, simplified traffic informations,
simplified parks informations and simplified environmental conservation
informations, within the respective counties of Onondaga and Cayuga.
12. Special police officers designated by the commissioner and the
directors of in-patient facilities in the office of mental health
pursuant to section 7.25 of the mental hygiene law, and special police
officers designated by the commissioner and the directors of facilities
under his or her jurisdiction in the office for people with
developmental disabilities pursuant to section 13.25 of the mental
hygiene law; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall
be deemed to authorize such officers to carry, possess, repair or
dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been
issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
13. Persons designated as special police officers by the director of a
hospital in the department of health pursuant to section four hundred
fifty-five of the public health law; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
15. Uniformed enforcement forces of the New York state thruway
authority, when acting pursuant to subdivision two of section three
hundred sixty-one of the public authorities law; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
16. Employees of the department of health designated pursuant to
section thirty-three hundred eighty-five of the public health law;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
17. Uniformed housing guards of the Buffalo municipal housing
authority.
18. Bay constable of the city of Rye, the villages of Mamaroneck,
South Nyack and bay constables of the towns of East Hampton, Hempstead,
Oyster Bay, Riverhead, Southampton, Southold, Islip, Shelter Island,
Brookhaven, Babylon, Smithtown, Huntington and North Hempstead;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize the bay constables in the city of Rye, the village of South
Nyack or the towns of Brookhaven, Babylon, Southold, East Hampton,
Riverhead, Islip, other than a bay constable of the town of Islip who
prior to April third, nineteen hundred ninety-eight served as
harbormaster for such town and whose position was reclassified as bay
constable for such town prior to such date, Smithtown, Huntington and
Shelter Island to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
19. Harbor masters appointed by a county, city, town or village.
20. Bridge and tunnel officers, sergeants, lieutenants, captains,
inspectors, deputy chiefs, assistant chiefs, and chiefs of the
Triborough bridge and tunnel authority.
21. a. Uniformed court officers of the unified court system.
b. Court clerks of the unified court system in the first and second
departments.
c. Marshall, deputy marshall, clerk or uniformed court officer of a
district court.
(d) Marshalls or deputy marshalls of a city court, provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
e. Uniformed court officers of the city of Mount Vernon.
f. Uniformed court officers of the city of Jamestown.
22. Patrolmen appointed by the Lake George park commission; provided
however that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
23. Parole officers or warrant officers in the department of
corrections and community supervision.
23-a. Parole revocation specialists in the department of corrections
and community supervision; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such employee to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
24. Probation officers.
25. Officials, as designated by the commissioner of the department of
corrections and community supervision pursuant to rules of the
department, and correction officers of any state correctional facility
or of any penal correctional institution.
26. Peace officers designated pursuant to the provisions of the New
York state defense emergency act, as set forth in chapter seven hundred
eighty-four of the laws of nineteen hundred fifty-one, as amended, when
acting pursuant to their special duties during a period of attack or
imminent attack by enemy forces, or during official drills called to
combat natural or man-made disasters, or during official drills in
preparation for an attack by enemy forces or in preparation for a
natural or man-made disaster; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law; and
provided further, that such officer shall have the powers set forth in
section 2.20 of this article only during a period of imminent or actual
attack by enemy forces and during drills authorized under section
twenty-nine-b of article two-B of the executive law, providing for the
use of civil defense forces in disasters. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, such officers shall have the power to direct and
control traffic during official drills in preparation for an attack by
enemy forces or in preparation for combating natural or man-made
disasters; however, this grant does not include any of the other powers
set forth in section 2.20 of this article.
27. New York city special patrolmen appointed by the police
commissioner pursuant to subdivision c or e of section 434a-7.0 or
subdivision c or e of section 14-106 of the administrative code of the
city of New York; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision
shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or
dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been
issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law and the employer has
authorized such officer to possess a firearm during any phase of the
officers on-duty employment. Special patrolmen shall have the powers set
forth in section 2.20 of this article only when they are acting pursuant
to their special duties; provided, however, that the following
categories of New York city special patrolmen shall have such powers
whether or not they are acting pursuant to their special duties: school
safety officers employed by the board of education of the city of New
York; parking control specialists, taxi and limousine inspectors, urban
park rangers and evidence and property control specialists employed by
the city of New York; and further provided that, with respect to the
aforementioned categories of New York city special patrolmen, where such
a special patrolman has been appointed by the police commissioner and,
upon the expiration of such appointment the police commissioner has
neither renewed such appointment nor explicitly determined that such
appointment shall not be renewed, such appointment shall remain in full
force and effect indefinitely, until such time as the police
commissioner expressly determines to either renew or terminate such
appointment.
28. All officers and members of the uniformed force of the New York
city fire department as set forth and subject to the limitations
contained in section 487a-15.0 of the administrative code of the city of
New York; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
29. Special police officers for horse racing, appointed pursuant to
the provisions of the pari-mutuel revenue law as set forth in chapter
two hundred fifty-four of the laws of nineteen hundred forty, as
amended; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
30. Supervising fire inspectors, fire inspectors, the fire marshal and
assistant fire marshals, all of whom are full-time employees of the
county of Nassau fire marshal's office.
32. Investigators of the department of motor vehicles, pursuant to
section three hundred ninety-two-b of the vehicle and traffic law;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
33. A city marshall of the city of New York who has received training
in firearms handling from the federal bureau of investigation or in the
New York city police academy, or in the absence of the available
training programs from the federal bureau of investigation and the New
York city police academy, from another law enforcement agency located in
the state of New York, and who has received a firearms permit from the
license division of the New York city police department.
34. New York Waterfront investigators, pursuant to article nineteen-I
of the executive law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
35. Special investigators appointed by the state board of elections,
pursuant to secton 3-107 of the election law.
36. Investigators appointed by the state liquor authority, pursuant to
section fifteen of the alcoholic beverage control law; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
37. Special patrolmen of a political subdivision, appointed pursuant
to section two hundred nine-v of the general municipal law; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
38. A special investigator of the New York city department of
investigation who has received training in firearms handling in the New
York police academy and has received a firearms permit from the license
division of the New York city police department.
39. Broome county special patrolman, appointed by the Broome county
attorney; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
40. Special officers employed by the city of New York or by the New
York city health and hospitals corporation; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law. The New York city health and hospitals corporation shall employ
peace officers appointed pursuant to this subdivision to perform the
patrol, investigation, and maintenance of the peace duties of special
officer, senior special officer and hospital security officer, provided
however that nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit managerial,
supervisory, or state licensed or certified professional employees of
the corporation from performing such duties where they are incidental to
their usual duties, or shall prohibit police officers employed by the
city of New York from performing these duties.
41. Fire police squads organized pursuant to section two hundred
nine-c of the general municipal law, at such times as the fire
department, fire company or an emergency rescue and first aid squad of
the fire department or fire company are on duty, or when, on orders of
the chief of the fire department or fire company of which they are
members, they are separately engaged in response to a call for
assistance pursuant to the provisions of section two hundred nine of the
general municipal law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
42. Special deputy sheriffs appointed by the sheriff of a county
within which any part of the grounds of Cornell university or the
grounds of any state institution constituting a part of the educational
and research plants owned or under the supervision, administration or
control of said university are located pursuant to section fifty-seven
hundred nine of the education law; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
43. Housing patrolmen of the Mount Vernon housing authority, acting
pursuant to rules of the Mount Vernon housing authority; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
44. The officers, employees and members of the New York city division
of fire prevention, in the bureau of fire, as set forth and subject to
the limitations contained in subdivision one of section 487a-1.0 of the
administrative code of the city of New York; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
45. Persons appointed and designated as peace officers by the Niagara
frontier transportation authority, pursuant to subdivision thirteen of
section twelve hundred ninety-nine-e of the public authorities law.
46. Persons appointed as peace officers by the Sea Gate Association
pursuant to the provisions of chapter three hundred ninety-one of the
laws of nineteen hundred forty, provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
47. Employees of the department of financial services when designated
as peace officers by the superintendent of financial services and acting
pursuant to their special duties as set forth in article four of the
financial services law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
48. New York state air base security guards when they are designated
as peace officers under military regulations promulgated by the chief of
staff to the governor and when performing their duties as air base
security guards pursuant to orders issued by appropriate military
authority; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such guards to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
49. Members of the army national guard military police and air
national guard security personnel belonging to the organized militia of
the state of New York when they are designated as peace officers under
military regulations promulgated by the adjutant general and when
performing their duties as military police officers or air security
personnel pursuant to orders issued by appropriate military authority;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such military police or air security personnel to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
50. Transportation supervisors in the city of White Plains appointed
by the commissioner of public safety in the city of White Plains;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
51. Officers and members of the fire investigation division of the
fire department of the city of Rochester, the city of Binghamton and the
city of Utica, when acting pursuant to their special duties in matters
arising under the laws relating to fires, the extinguishment thereof and
fire perils; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall
be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose
of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
52. Security hospital treatment assistants, as so designated by the
commissioner of the office of mental health while performing duties in
or arising out of the course of their employment; provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
employee to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
53. Authorized agents of the municipal directors of weights and
measures in the counties of Suffolk, Nassau and Westchester when acting
pursuant to their special duties as set forth in section one hundred
eighty-one of the agriculture and markets law; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
54. Special police officers appointed pursuant to section one hundred
fifty-eight of the town law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* 55. Special patrolmen for sports facilities in the performance of
sporting events, pursuant to the provisions of section one hundred six-b
of the alcoholic beverage control law; provided, however, that nothing
in this section shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair, or dispose of a firearm unless such officer is required
pursuant to his status as a police officer within this state.
* NB Expired July 1, 1993
56. Dog control officers of the town of Brookhaven, who at the
discretion of the town board may be designated as constables for the
purpose of enforcing article twenty-six of the agriculture and markets
law and for the purpose of issuing appearance tickets permitted under
article seven of such law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
57. Harbor Park rangers employed by the Snug Harbor cultural center in
Richmond county and appointed as New York city special patrolmen by the
police commissioner pursuant to subdivision c of section 14-106 of the
administrative code of the city of New York. Notwithstanding any
provision of law, rule or regulation, such officers shall be authorized
to issue appearance tickets pursuant to section 150.20 of this chapter,
and shall have such other powers as are specified in section 2.20 of
this article only when acting pursuant to their special duties. Nothing
in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officers to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law and
the employer has authorized such officer to possess a firearm during any
phase of the officer's on-duty employment.
* 57-a. Seasonal park rangers of the Westchester county department of
public safety while employed as authorized by the commissioner of public
safety/sheriff of the county of Westchester; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* NB There are 2 sub 57-a's
* 57-a. Officers of the Westchester county public safety emergency
force, when activated by the commissioner of public safety/sheriff of
the county of Westchester; provided, however that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 57-a's
58. Uniformed members of the security force of the Troy housing
authority provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
59. Officers and members of the sanitation police of the department of
sanitation of the city of New York, duly appointed and designated as
peace officers by such department; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
Provided, further, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
apply to officers and members of the sanitation police regularly and
exclusively assigned to enforcement of such city's residential recycling
laws.
61. Chief fire marshall, assistant chief fire marshall, fire marshall
II and fire marshall I, all of whom are full-time employees of the
Suffolk county department of fire, rescue and emergency services, when
acting pursuant to their special duties in matters arising under the
laws relating to fires, the extinguishment thereof and fire perils;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
* 62. Chief fire marshall, assistant chief fire marshall, fire
marshall II and fire marshall I, all of whom are full-time employees of
the town of Babylon, when acting pursuant to their special duties in
matters arising under the laws relating to fires, the extinguishment
thereof and fire perils; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 62's
* 62. Employees of the division for youth assigned to transport and
warrants units who are specifically designated by the director in
accordance with section five hundred four-b of the executive law,
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such employees to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a
firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant
to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 62's
* 63. Uniformed members of the fire marshal's office in the town of
Southampton and the town of Riverhead, when acting pursuant to their
special duties in matters arising under the laws relating to fires, the
extinguishment thereof and fire perils; provided, however that nothing
in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 63's
* 63. Employees of the town court of the town of Greenburgh serving as
a security officer; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision
will be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or
dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been
issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law or to authorize such
officer to carry or possess a firearm except while on duty.
* NB There are 2 sub 63's
64. Cell block attendants employed by the city of Buffalo police
department; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
65. Chief fire marshall, assistant chief fire marshall, fire marshall
II and fire marshall I, all of whom are full-time employees of the town
of Brookhaven, when acting pursuant to their special duties in matters
arising under the laws relating to fires, the extinguishment thereof and
fire perils; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall
be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose
of a firearm unless the appropriate license thereof has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
66. Employees of the village court of the village of Spring Valley
serving as security officers at such village court; provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
67. Employees of the town court of the town of Putnam Valley serving
as a security officer; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision will be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law or to
authorize such officer to carry or possess a firearm except while on
duty.
* 68. The state inspector general and investigators designated by the
state inspector general; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize the state inspector general or
such investigators to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 5 sub 68's
* 68. Dog control officers of the town of Arcadia, who at the
discretion of the town board may be designated as constables for the
purpose of enforcing article twenty-six of the agriculture and markets
law and for the purpose of issuing appearance tickets permitted under
article seven of such law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 5 sub 68's
* 68. Employees appointed by the sheriff of Livingston county, when
acting pursuant to their special duties serving as uniformed marine
patrol officers; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision
shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or
dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law or to authorize such officer
to carry or possess a firearm except while on duty.
* NB There are 5 sub 68's
* 68. Employees of the town court of the town of Southampton serving
as uniformed court officers at such town court; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* NB There are 5 sub 68's
* 68. Persons employed by the Chautauqua county sheriff's office
serving as court security officers; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 5 sub 68's
69. Employees of the village court of the village of Amityville
serving as uniformed court officers at such village court; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
70. Employees appointed by the sheriff of Yates county, pursuant to
their special duties serving as uniformed marine patrol officers;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law or to authorize such officer to carry or possess
a firearm except while on duty.
71. Town of Smithtown fire marshalls when acting pursuant to their
special duties in matters arising under the laws relating to fires, the
extinguishment thereof and fire perils; provided, however, that nothing
in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officers to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
72. Persons employed by Canisius college as members of the security
force of such college; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
73. Employees of the town court of the town of Newburgh serving as
uniformed court officers at such town court; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* 74. a. Special deputy sheriffs appointed by the sheriff of Tompkins
county pursuant to paragraphs b and c of this subdivision; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless
the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section
400.00 of the penal law.
b. For the protection of the grounds, buildings and property of Ithaca
college the prevention of crime and the enforcement of law and order,
and for the enforcement of such rules and regulations as the board of
trustees of Ithaca college shall from time to time make, the sheriff of
Tompkins county may appoint and remove following consultation with
Ithaca college such number of special deputy sheriffs as is determined
by the sheriff to be necessary for the maintenance of public order at
Ithaca college, such appointments to be made from persons nominated by
the president of Ithaca college. Such special deputy sheriffs shall
comply with requirements as established by the sheriff and shall act
only within Tompkins county. Such special deputy sheriffs so appointed
shall be employees of the college and subject to its supervision and
control as outlined in the terms and conditions to be mutually agreed
upon between the sheriff and Ithaca college. Such special deputy
sheriffs shall have the powers of peace officers and shall act solely
within the said grounds or premises owned or administered by Ithaca
college, except in those rare and special situations when requested by
the sheriff to provide assistance on any public highway which crosses or
adjoins such property. Ithaca college will provide legal defense and
indemnification, and hold harmless the county of Tompkins, its officers
and employees and the Tompkins county sheriff, its officers and
employees, from all claims arising out of conduct by or injury to, such
personnel while carrying out their law enforcement functions except in
those situations when they are acting under the direct supervision and
control of the county or sheriff's department.
c. Every special deputy sheriff so appointed shall, before entering
upon the duties of his or her office, take and subscribe the oath of
office prescribed by article thirteen of the constitution of the state
of New York which oath shall be filed in the office of the county clerk
of Tompkins county. Every special deputy sheriff appointed under this
subdivision when on regular duty shall wear conspicuously a metallic
shield with a designating number and the words "Special Deputy Sheriff
Ithaca College" thereon.
* NB There are 4 sub 74's
* 74. Parks and recreation forest rangers employed by the office of
parks, recreation and historic preservation; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
individuals to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 74's
* 74. Employees of the village court of the village of Quogue, town of
Southampton serving as uniformed court officers at such village court;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 74's
* 74. Employees of the town court of the town of East Hampton serving
as uniformed court officers at such town court; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* NB There are 4 sub 74's
* 75. Dog control officers of the town of Clarence, who at the
discretion of the town board may be designated as constables for the
purpose of enforcing article twenty-six of the agriculture and markets
law and for the purpose of issuing appearance tickets permitted under
article seven of the agriculture and markets law; provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
officers to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
* NB There are 3 sub 75's
* 75. Airport security guards, senior airport security guards, airport
security supervisors, retired police officers, and supervisors of same,
who are designated by resolution of the town board of the town of Islip
to provide security at Long Island MacArthur Airport when acting
pursuant to their duties as such, and such authority being specifically
limited to the grounds of the said airport. However, nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 3 sub 75's
* 75. Officers and members of the fire investigation unit of the fire
department of the city of Buffalo when acting pursuant to their special
duties in matters arising under the laws relating to fires, the
extinguishment thereof and fire perils; provided, however, that nothing
in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 3 sub 75's
* 76. Employees of the village court of the village of Southampton,
town of Southampton serving as uniformed court officers at such village
court; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 76's
* 76. Animal control officers employed by the city of Peekskill;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such individuals to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a
firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant
to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 76's
* 77. (a) Syracuse University peace officers appointed by the chief
law enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse pursuant to paragraphs
(b), (c) and (d) of this subdivision, who shall be authorized to issue
appearance tickets and simplified traffic informations; provided,
however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize
any such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
(b) For the protection of the grounds, buildings and property of
Syracuse University, the prevention of crime and the enforcement of law
and order, and for the enforcement of such rules and regulations as
Syracuse University shall from time to time establish, the chief law
enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse may appoint and remove,
following consultations with Syracuse University; such number of
Syracuse University peace officers as is determined by the chief law
enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse to be necessary for the
maintenance of public order at such university, such appointments to be
made from persons nominated by the chancellor of Syracuse University.
Such peace officers shall comply with such requirements as shall be
established by the chief law enforcement officer of the city of
Syracuse. Such Syracuse University peace officers so appointed shall be
employees of such university, and subject to its supervision and control
and the terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon between the
chief law enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse and Syracuse
University. Nothing in this paragraph shall limit the authority of
Syracuse University to remove such peace officers. Such Syracuse
University peace officers shall have the powers of peace officers within
the geographical area of employment of the grounds or premises owned,
controlled or administrated by Syracuse University within the county of
Onondaga, except in those situations when requested by the chief law
enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse or his or her designee,
including by means of written protocols agreed to by the chief law
enforcement officer of the city of Syracuse and Syracuse University, to
provide assistance on any public highway which crosses or adjoins such
grounds or premises. Syracuse University shall provide legal defense and
indemnification, and hold harmless the city of Syracuse, and its
officers and employees from all claims arising out of conduct by or
injury to, such peace officers while carrying out their law enforcement
functions, except in those situations when they are acting under the
direct supervision and control of the chief law enforcement officer of
the city of Syracuse, or his or her designee.
(c) Every Syracuse University peace officer so appointed shall, before
entering upon the duties of his or her office, take and subscribe the
oath of office prescribed by article thirteen of the state constitution,
which oath shall be filed in the office of the county clerk of the
county of Onondaga. Every such peace officer appointed pursuant to this
subdivision when on regular duty shall conspicuously wear a metallic
shield with a designating number and the words "Syracuse University
Peace Officer" engraved thereon.
(d) To become eligible for appointment as a Syracuse University peace
officer a candidate shall, in addition to the training requirements as
set forth in section 2.30 of this article, complete the course of
instruction in public and private law enforcement established pursuant
to paragraph (c) of subdivision five of section sixty-four hundred fifty
of the education law.
* NB There are 2 sub 77's
* 77. Chief fire marshal, assistant chief fire marshal, and fire
marshals, all of whom are full-time employees of the town of East
Hampton, when acting pursuant to their special duties in matters arising
under the laws relating to fires, the extinguishment thereof and fire
perils; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 2 sub 77's
78. A security officer employed by a community college who is
specifically designated as a peace officer by the board of trustees of a
community college pursuant to subdivision five-a of section sixty-three
hundred six of the education law, or by a community college regional
board of trustees pursuant to subdivision four-a of section sixty-three
hundred ten of the education law; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* 79. Court security officers employed by the Wayne county sheriff's
office; provided however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 79's
* 79. Supervisors and members of the arson investigation bureau and
fire inspection bureau of the office of fire prevention and control when
acting pursuant to their special duties in matters arising under the
laws relating to fires, their prevention, extinguishment, investigation
thereof, and fire perils; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such employees to carry,
possess, repair, or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 79's
* 79. Peace officers appointed by the city university of New York
pursuant to subdivision sixteen of section sixty-two hundred six of the
education law, who shall have the powers set forth in section 2.20 of
this article whether or not they are acting pursuant to their special
duties; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 79's
* 79. Animal control officers of the city of Elmira, who at the
discretion of the city council of the city of Elmira may be designated
as constables for the purpose of enforcing article twenty-six of the
agriculture and markets law, and for the purpose of issuing appearance
tickets permitted under article seven of such law; provided, however,
that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such
officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the
appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00
of the penal law.
* NB There are 4 sub 79's
80. Employees of the Onondaga county sheriff's department serving as
uniformed court security officers at Onondaga county court facilities;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officers to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a
firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant
to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* 81. Members of the security force employed by Erie County Medical
Center; provided however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
* 81. Employees of the town of Riverhead serving as court officers at
town of Riverhead court facilities; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officers to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
* 81. Employees of the town court of the town of Southold serving as
uniformed court officers at such town court; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
* 81. Commissioners of and court officers in the department of public
safety for the town of Rye when acting pursuant to their special duties
in matters arising under the laws relating to maintaining the safety and
security of citizens, judges and court personnel in the town court, and
effecting the safe and secure transport of persons under the custody of
said department; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision
shall be deemed to authorize such employees to carry, possess, repair,
or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been
issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
* 81. Employees of the town of Yorktown serving as court attendants at
town of Yorktown court facilities; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such employees to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
* 81. Employees of the Lewis county sheriff's department serving as
uniformed court security officers at Lewis county court facilities;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officers to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a
firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant
to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 81's
82. Employees of the New York city business integrity commission
designated as peace officers by the chairperson of such commission;
provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to
authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm
unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law.
83. Members of the security force employed by Kaleida Health within
and directly adjacent to the hospital buildings on the medical campus
located between East North Street, Goodell Street, Main Street and
Michigan Avenue. These officers shall only have the powers listed in
paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section 2.20 of this article, as
well as the power to detain an individual for a reasonable period of
time while awaiting the arrival of law enforcement, provided that the
officer has actual knowledge, or probable cause to believe, that such
individual has committed an offense; provided however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
84. (a) Public safety officers employed by the University of Rochester
who are designated as peace officers by the board of trustees of the
University of Rochester pursuant to paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this
subdivision; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall
be deemed to authorize any such officer to carry, possess, repair or
dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been
issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
(b) For the protection of the grounds, buildings and property of the
University of Rochester, the prevention of crime and the enforcement of
law and order, the board of trustees of the University of Rochester may
appoint and remove such number of public safety officers designated as
peace officers as is determined by the board of trustees to be necessary
for the maintenance of public order consistent with this subdivision.
Such peace officers shall comply with such requirements as shall be
mutually agreed upon between the chief law enforcement officers of the
applicable local law enforcement jurisdictions and the University of
Rochester. Such University of Rochester peace officers so appointed
shall be employees of the University of Rochester and subject to its
supervision and control. Such University of Rochester peace officers
shall have the powers of peace officers within the geographic area of
employment of the grounds or premises owned, controlled or administered
by the University of Rochester within the county of Monroe, on any
public street and sidewalk that abuts the grounds, buildings or property
of such university, and beyond such geographic area upon the request of
the chief law enforcement officer of the local law enforcement
jurisdiction or his or her designee, for the purpose of transporting an
individual who has been arrested in accordance with section 140.27 of
this chapter and when no local law enforcement officer is available for
transporting such individual in a timely manner.
(c) The University of Rochester shall provide legal defense and
indemnification to applicable municipality and its officers and
employees, and hold them harmless, against all claims arising out of
conduct by or injury to such peace officers while carrying out their
special duties, except in those situations when they are acting as
agents of the chief law enforcement officer of the applicable local law
enforcement jurisdiction or his or her designee.
(d) To become eligible for designation as a University of Rochester
peace officer, a candidate shall, in addition to the training
requirements as set forth in section 2.30 of this article, complete the
course of instruction in public and private law enforcement established
pursuant to subdivision three of section sixty-four hundred thirty-five
of the education law.
85. Uniformed members of the bureau of fire prevention of the town of
Islip, when acting pursuant to their special duties in matters arising
under laws relating to fires, the extinguishment thereof and fire
perils; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such members to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
86. Investigators appointed by the cannabis control board, pursuant to
section ten of the cannabis law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair, or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
87. Officers and members of the security force employed by Rochester
Regional Health, within the grounds or premises owned or under the
supervision, administration, or control of Rochester Regional Health
located on the campuses and at the facilities of Rochester General
Hospital and Unity Hospital, shall have the powers of peace officers,
and beyond such geographic area upon the request of the chief law
enforcement officer of the local law enforcement jurisdiction or such
chief law enforcement officer's designee, for the purpose of
transporting an individual who has been arrested in accordance with
section 140.27 of this chapter and where no local law enforcement
officer is available for transporting such individual in a timely
manner. Such peace officers shall only have the powers listed in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) of subdivision one of
section 2.20 of this article, and the power to detain an individual for
a reasonable period of time while awaiting the arrival of law
enforcement, provided that such peace officer has actual knowledge, or
probable cause to believe, that such individual has committed an
offense; provided however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* 88. Employees of the town court of the town of Montgomery serving as
uniformed court officers at such town court; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
* 88. Employees of the village court of the village of Ardsley serving
as security officers at such village court. Such officers shall only
have the powers listed in paragraphs (b), (h), and (i) of subdivision
one of section 2.20 of this article; provided, however that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such security officers to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law; and
provided further, that if such a security officer is not otherwise a
police officer pursuant to section 1.20 of this title or a peace officer
pursuant to this section, such security officer shall successfully
complete the training required under section 2.30 of this section.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
* 88. Officers and members of the security force employed by Highland
Hospital, within the grounds or premises owned or under the supervision,
administration, or control of Highland Hospital located on the campuses
and at the facilities of Highland Hospital, shall have the powers of
peace officers, and beyond such geographic area upon the request of the
chief law enforcement officer of the local law enforcement jurisdiction
or such chief law enforcement officer's designee, for the purpose of
transporting an individual who has been arrested in accordance with
section 140.27 of this chapter and where no local law enforcement
officer is available for transporting such individual in a timely
manner. Such peace officers shall only have the powers listed in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) of subdivision one of
section 2.20 of this article, and the power to detain an individual for
a reasonable period of time while awaiting the arrival of law
enforcement, provided that such peace officer has actual knowledge, or
probable cause to believe, that such individual has committed an
offense; provided however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
* 88. Dog control officers of the village of Holley, who at the
discretion of the village board may be designated as constables for the
purpose of enforcing article twenty-six of the agriculture and markets
law and for the purpose of issuing appearance tickets permitted under
article seven of such law; provided, however, that nothing in this
subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor
has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
* 88. Security officers employed by St. Joseph's Health Hospital,
located at 301 Prospect Avenue in the city of Syracuse; North Medical
Center, located at Taft Road in the village of North Syracuse; and
Northeast Medical Center, located at Northeast Medical Center Drive,
Suite 301 in the village of Fayetteville, when acting pursuant to their
special duties on the grounds or premises owned, controlled or
administered by such hospital or any of its subsidiaries, shall have the
powers of peace officers within such geographic area and beyond such
area upon the request of the chief law enforcement officer of the local
law enforcement jurisdiction or such officer's designee for the purpose
of transporting an individual who has been arrested in accordance with
section 140.27 of this chapter when no local law enforcement officer is
available to transport such individual in a timely manner. Such peace
officers shall have the powers set forth in paragraphs (a), (b), (c),
(d), (e) and (h) of subdivision one of section 2.20 of this article and
the power to detain an individual for a reasonable period of time while
awaiting the arrival of law enforcement, provided that such peace
officer has actual knowledge, or probable cause to believe, that such
individual has committed an offense; provided, however, that nothing in
this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry,
possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license
therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
* 88. Security officers employed by Albany Memorial Hospital, located
at 600 Northern Boulevard in the city of Albany; Samaritan Hospital,
located at 2215 Burdett Avenue in the city of Troy; and St. Peter's
Hospital, located at 315 South Manning Boulevard in the city of Albany,
when acting pursuant to their special duties on the grounds or premises
owned, controlled or administered by such hospital or any of its
subsidiaries, or on any public street or sidewalk that abuts the
property of such hospital, shall have the powers of peace officers
within such geographic area and beyond such area upon the request of the
chief law enforcement officer of the local law enforcement jurisdiction
or such officer's designee for the purpose of transporting an individual
who has been arrested in accordance with section 140.27 of this chapter
when no local law enforcement officer is available to transport such
individual in a timely manner. Such peace officers shall have the powers
set forth in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (h) of subdivision
one of section 2.20 of this article and the power to detain an
individual for a reasonable period of time while awaiting the arrival of
law enforcement, provided that such peace officer has actual knowledge,
or probable cause to believe, that such individual has committed an
offense; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be
deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of
a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued
pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law.
* NB There are 6 sb 88's
89. Employees of the village court of the village of Pleasantville
serving as security officers at such village court. These officers shall
only have the powers listed in paragraphs (b), (h), and (i) of
subdivision one of section 2.20 of this article; provided, however, that
nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to
carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate
license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal
law; provided, however, that if such employee is not currently a police
or peace officer pursuant to section 1.20 of this title or 2.10 of this
article, such employee must successfully complete the training required
under section 2.30 of this article.
Federal law enforcement officers; powers.
The following federal law enforcement officers shall have the powers
set forth in paragraphs (a) (with the exception of the powers provided
by paragraph (b) of subdivision one and paragraph (b) of subdivision
three of section 140.25 of this chapter), (b), (c) and (h) of
subdivision one of section 2.20 of this article:
1. Federal Bureau of Investigation special agents.
2. United States Secret Service special agents.
3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement special agents, deportation
officers, and detention and deportation officers.
4. United States Marshals and Marshals Service deputies.
5. Drug Enforcement Administration special agents.
6. Federal Protective Officers, including law enforcement security
officers, criminal investigators and police officers of the Federal
Protective Service.
7. United States Customs and Border Protection Officers and United
States Customs and Border Protection Border Patrol agents.
8. United States Postal Service police officers and inspectors.
9. United States park police; provided, however that, notwithstanding
any provision of this section to the contrary, such park police shall
also have the powers set forth in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of
section 140.25 of this chapter and the powers set forth in paragraphs
(d), (e) and (g) of subdivision one of section 2.20 of this article.
10. United States probation officers.
11. United States General Services Administration special agents.
12. United States Department of Agriculture special agents.
13. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms special agents.
14. Internal Revenue Service special agents and inspectors.
15. Officers of the United States bureau of prisons.
16. United States Fish and Wildlife special agents.
17. United States Naval Investigative Service special agents.
18. United States Department of State special agents.
19. Special agents of the defense criminal investigative service of
the United States department of defense.
20. United States Department of Commerce, Office of Export
Enforcement, special agents.
21. United States Department of Veterans Administration police
officers employed at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in
Batavia.
22. Federal Reserve law enforcement officers.
23. Federal air marshal program special agents.
* 24. United States department of transportation federal police
officers and police supervisors assigned to the United States Merchant
Marine Academy in Kings Point, New York; provided, however that,
notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, such
police shall also have the powers set forth in paragraph (b) of
subdivision one of section 140.25 of this chapter and the powers set
forth in paragraphs (d), (e) and (g) of subdivision one of section 2.20
of this article when acting pursuant to their special duties within the
geographical area of their employment or within one hundred yards of
such geographical area.
* NB There are 2 sb 24's
* 24. United States Coast Guard Investigative Service special agents.
* NB There are 2 sb 24's
25. United States Department of Commerce, special agents and
enforcement officers of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's Fisheries Office for Law Enforcement.
26. Department of the Army special agents, detectives and police
officers.
27. United States Department of Interior, park rangers with law
enforcement authority.
28. United States Environmental Protection Agency special agents with
law enforcement authority.
29. United States mint police.
Watershed protection and enforcement officers; powers, duties,
jurisdiction for arrests.
1. Watershed protection and enforcement officers appointed by the city
of Peekskill shall have the powers set forth in paragraphs (a), (b),
(c), (f), (g), and (h) of subdivision one of section 2.20 of this
article; provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be deemed
to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair, or dispose of a
firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant
to section 400.00 of the penal law. Watershed protection and enforcement
officers shall complete the training requirements set forth in section
2.30 of this article.
2. The city of Peekskill may appoint the following persons as
watershed protection and enforcement officers:
(a) the water superintendent;
(b) the deputy assistant to the water superintendent; and
(c) the watershed inspector or inspectors.
3. The duties of the watershed protection and enforcement officers
shall be to enforce those provisions of the environmental conservation
law and the penal law which relate to the contamination of water in
those areas of the Hollow Brook watershed located within the city of
Peekskill, including its reservoirs, shoreline, and tributaries, and
those areas of the Hollow Brook watershed and Wiccopee reservoir located
outside of the city of Peekskill in the counties of Putnam and
Westchester, including its reservoirs, shoreline, and tributaries.
4. Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of subdivision thirty-four-a of
section 1.20 of this title and paragraph (b) of subdivision five of
section 140.25 of this chapter, watershed protection and enforcement
officers are authorized to make arrests and issue appearance tickets in
those areas of the Hollow Brook watershed and Wiccopee reservoir located
outside of the city of Peekskill in the counties of Putnam and
Westchester, including along its reservoirs, shoreline, and tributaries.
Powers of peace officers.
1. The persons designated in section 2.10 of this article shall have
the following powers:
(a) The power to make warrantless arrests pursuant to section 140.25
of this chapter.
(b) The power to use physical force and deadly physical force in
making an arrest or preventing an escape pursuant to section 35.30 of
the penal law.
(c) The power to carry out warrantless searches whenever such searches
are constitutionally permissible and acting pursuant to their special
duties.
(d) The power to issue appearance tickets pursuant to subdivision
three of section 150.20 of this chapter, when acting pursuant to their
special duties. New York city special patrolmen shall have the power to
issue an appearance ticket only when it is pursuant to rules and
regulations of the police commissioner of the city of New York.
(e) The power to issue uniform appearance tickets pursuant to article
twenty-seven of the parks, recreation and historic preservation law and
to issue simplified traffic informations pursuant to section 100.25 of
this chapter and section two hundred seven of the vehicle and traffic
law whenever acting pursuant to their special duties.
(f) The power to issue a uniform navigation summons and/or complaint
pursuant to section nineteen of the navigation law whenever acting
pursuant to their special duties.
(g) The power to issue uniform appearance tickets pursuant to article
seventy-one of the environmental conservation law, whenever acting
pursuant to their special duties.
(h) The power to possess and take custody of firearms not owned by the
peace officer, for the purpose of disposing, guarding, or any other
lawful purpose, consistent with his duties as a peace officer.
(i) Any other power which a particular peace officer is otherwise
authorized to exercise by any general, special or local law or charter
whenever acting pursuant to his special duties, provided such power is
not inconsistent with the provisions of the penal law or this chapter.
(j) Uniformed court officers shall have the power to issue traffic
summonses and complaints for parking, standing, or stopping violations
pursuant to the vehicle and traffic law whenever acting pursuant to
their special duties.
2. For the purposes of this section a peace officer acts pursuant to
his special duties when he performs the duties of his office, pursuant
to the specialized nature of his particular employment, whereby he is
required or authorized to enforce any general, special or local law or
charter, rule, regulation, judgment or order.
3. A peace officer, whether or not acting pursuant to his special
duties, who lawfully exercises any of the powers conferred upon him
pursuant to this section, shall be deemed to be acting within the scope
of his public employment for purposes of defense and indemnification
rights and benefits that he may be otherwise entitled to under the
provisions of section fifty-k of the general municipal law, section
seventeen or eighteen of the public officers law, or any other
applicable section of law.
Training requirements for peace officers.
1. Every peace officer in the state of New York must successfully
complete a training program, a portion of which shall be prescribed by
the municipal police training council and a portion of which shall be
prescribed by his or her employer. The portion prescribed by the
municipal police training council shall be comprised of subjects, and
the hours each is to be taught, that shall be required of all types or
classes of peace officers. The hours of instruction required by the
municipal police training council shall not exceed one hundred eighty,
unless a greater amount is either required by law or regulation, or is
requested by the employer.
The segment prescribed by the employer for its employees shall be
comprised of subjects, and the hours each is to be taught, relating to
the special nature of the duties of the peace officers employed by it
provided, however, that when the subjects prescribed by the employer are
identical to the subjects in the training program required by the
municipal police training council, the employer shall not be required to
provide duplicate training for those subjects.
2. Each state or local agency, unit of local government, state or
local commission, or public authority, or public or private organization
which employs peace officers shall provide the training mandated by this
section, the cost of which will be borne by the employer. Each peace
officer satisfactorily completing the course prescribed by the municipal
police training council shall be awarded a certificate by the division
of criminal justice services attesting to that effect, and no person
appointed as a peace officer shall exercise the powers of a peace
officer, unless he or she has received such certification within twelve
months of appointment.
3. No employer shall allow any peace officer it employs to carry or
use a weapon during any phase of the officer's official duties, which
constitutes on-duty employment, unless the officer has satisfactorily
completed a course of training approved by the municipal police training
council in the use of deadly physical force and firearms and other
weapons, and annually receives instruction in deadly physical force and
the use of firearms and other weapons as approved by the municipal
police training council.
4. Upon the failure or refusal to comply with the requirements of this
section, the commissioner of the division of criminal justice services
shall apply to the supreme court for an order directed to the person
responsible requiring compliance. Upon such application, the court may
issue such order as may be just, and a failure to comply with the order
of the court shall be a contempt of court and punishable as such.
5. Every employer of peace officers shall report to the division of
criminal justice services, in such form and at such time as the division
may by regulation require, the names of all peace officers who have
satisfactorily completed any of the training requirements prescribed by
this section.
6. A certificate attesting to satisfactory completion of the training
requirements imposed under this section awarded to any peace officer by
the executive director of the municipal police training council pursuant
to this section shall remain valid:
(a) during the holder's continuous service as a peace officer; and
(b) for two years after the date of the commencement of an
interruption in such service where the holder had, immediately prior to
such interruption, served as a peace officer for less than two
consecutive years; or
(c) for four years after the date of the commencement of an
interruption in such service where the holder had, immediately prior to
such interruption, served as a peace officer for two consecutive years
or longer.
As used in this subdivision, the term "interruption" shall mean a
period of separation from employment as a peace officer by reason of
such officer's leave of absence, resignation or removal, other than
removal for cause.
TITLE B The Criminal Courts
ARTICLE 10 The Criminal Courts
The criminal courts; enumeration and definitions.
1. The "criminal courts" of this state are comprised of the superior
courts and the local criminal courts.
2. "Superior court" means:
(a) The supreme court; or
(b) A county court.
3. "Local criminal court" means:
(a) A district court; or
(b) The New York City criminal court; or
(c) A city court; or
(d) A town court; or
(e) A village court; or
(f) A supreme court justice sitting as a local criminal court; or
(g) A county judge sitting as a local criminal court.
4. "City court" means any court for a city, other than New York City,
having trial jurisdiction of offenses of less than felony grade only
committed within such city, whether such court is entitled a city court,
a municipal court, a police court, a recorder's court or is known by any
other name or title.
5. "Town court." A "town court" is comprised of all the town justices
of a town.
6. "Village court." A "village court" is comprised of the justice of a
village, or all the justices thereof if there be more than one, or, at a
time when he or they are absent, an associate justice of a village who
is authorized to perform the functions of a village justice during his
absence.
7. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a court
specified herein which possesses civil as well as criminal jurisdiction
does not act as a criminal court when acting solely in the exercise of
its civil jurisdiction, and an order or determination made by such a
court in its civil capacity is not an order or determination of a
criminal court even though it may terminate or otherwise control or
affect a criminal action or proceeding.
Superior courts; jurisdiction.
1. Superior courts have trial jurisdiction of all offenses. They have:
(a) Exclusive trial jurisdiction of felonies; and
(b) Trial jurisdiction of misdemeanors concurrent with that of the
local criminal courts; and
(c) Trial jurisdiction of petty offenses, but only when such an
offense is charged in an indictment which also charges a crime.
2. Superior courts have preliminary jurisdiction of all offenses, but
they exercise such jurisdiction only by reason of and through the agency
of their grand juries.
3. Superior court judges may, in their discretion, sit as local
criminal courts for the following purposes:
(a) conducting arraignments, as provided in subdivision two of section
170.15 and subdivision two of section 180.20 of this chapter;
(b) issuing warrants of arrests, as provided in subdivision one of
section 120.70 of this chapter; and
(c) issuing search warrants, as provided in article six hundred ninety
of this chapter.
Local criminal courts; jurisdiction.
1. Local criminal courts have trial jurisdiction of all offenses
other than felonies. They have:
(a) Exclusive trial jurisdiction of petty offenses except for the
superior court jurisdiction thereof prescribed in paragraph (c) of
subdivision one of section 10.20; and
(b) Trial jurisdiction of misdemeanors concurrent with that of the
superior courts but subject to divestiture thereof by the latter in any
particular case.
2. Local criminal courts have preliminary jurisdiction of all
offenses subject to divestiture thereof in any particular case by the
superior courts and their grand juries.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, a superior
court judge sitting as a local criminal court does not have trial
jurisdiction of any offense, but has preliminary jurisdiction only, as
provided in subdivision two.
Chief administrator to prescribe forms and to authorize use of
electronic filing.
1. The chief administrator of the courts shall have the power to
adopt, amend and rescind forms for the efficient and just administration
of this chapter. Such forms shall include, without limitation, the forms
described in paragraph (z-1) of subdivision two of section two hundred
twelve of the judiciary law. A failure by any party to submit papers in
compliance with forms authorized by this section shall not be grounds
for that reason alone for denial or granting of any motion.
2. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the chief
administrator, with the approval of the administrative board of the
courts, may promulgate rules authorizing a program in the use of
electronic means ("e-filing") in the courts of New York having criminal
jurisdiction for: (i) the filing with a court of an accusatory
instrument for the purpose of commencement of a criminal action or
proceeding, and (ii) the filing and service of papers in pending actions
and proceedings. Provided, however, the chief administrator shall
consult with the county clerk of a county outside the city of New York
before the use of electronic means is to be authorized hereunder in the
supreme court or county court of such county, afford him or her the
opportunity to submit comments with respect thereto, consider any such
comments and obtain the agreement thereto of such county clerk.
(b) Participation in this program may be required or may be voluntary
as provided by the chief administrator, except that it shall be strictly
voluntary as to any party to an action or proceeding who is not
represented by counsel unless such party, upon his or her request,
chooses to participate.
(c) (i) Where participation in this program is to be voluntary: (A)
filing an accusatory instrument by electronic means with the court for
the purpose of commencement of an action or proceeding shall not require
the consent of any other party; nor shall a party's failure to consent
to participation in an action or proceeding bar any other party to such
action or proceeding from filing and serving papers by facsimile
transmission or electronic means upon the court or any other party to
such action or proceeding who has consented to participation;
(B) all parties shall be notified clearly, in plain language, about
their options to participate in filing by electronic means;
(C) no party to an action or proceeding shall be compelled, directly
or indirectly, to participate;
(D) where a party is not represented by counsel, the court shall
explain such party's options for electronic filing in plain language,
including the option for expedited processing, and shall inquire whether
he or she wishes to participate, provided however the unrepresented
litigant may participate in the program only upon his or her request,
which shall be documented in the case file, after said party has been
presented with sufficient information in plain language concerning the
program.
(ii) Where participation in this program is to be required:
(A) such requirement shall not be effective in a court in a county
unless, in addition to consulting with the county clerk of such county
and obtaining his or her agreement thereto if the court is a supreme
court or county court, the chief administrator shall:
(1) first consult with and obtain the agreement of the district
attorney and the criminal defense bar of such county, provide all
persons and organizations, or their representative or representatives,
who regularly appear in criminal actions or proceedings in the criminal
courts of such county with reasonable notice and opportunity to submit
comments with respect thereto and give due consideration to all such
comments, and consult with the members of the advisory committee
specified in subparagraph (v) of paragraph (u) of subdivision two of
section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law; and
(2) afford all those with whom he or she consults pursuant to item one
of this clause the opportunity to submit comments with respect to the
program, which comments, including but not limited to comments related
to unrepresented litigants, he or she shall consider and shall post for
public review on the office of court administration's website; and
(B) as provided in paragraph (d) of this subdivision, no party who is
not represented by counsel nor any counsel in an affected case who opts
out of participation in the program shall be required to participate
therein.
(d) Where the chief administrator requires participation in electronic
filing as provided in paragraph (b) of this subdivision, he or she shall
afford counsel the opportunity to opt out of the program, via
presentation of a prescribed form to be filed with the court where the
criminal action is pending. Said form shall permit an attorney to opt
out of participation in the program under any of the following
circumstances, in which event, he or she will not be compelled to
participate:
(i) Where the attorney certifies in good faith that he or she lacks
appropriate computer hardware and/or connection to the internet and/or
scanner or other device by which documents may be converted to an
electronic format; or
(ii) Where the attorney certifies in good faith that he or she lacks
the requisite knowledge in the operation of such computers and/or
scanners necessary to participate. For the purposes of this
subparagraph, the knowledge of any employee of an attorney, or any
employee of the attorney's law firm, office or business who is subject
to such attorney's direction, shall be imputed to the attorney.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph: (A) where
a party is not represented by counsel, the clerk shall explain such
party's options for electronic filing in plain language, including the
option for expedited processing, and shall inquire whether he or she
wishes to participate, provided however the unrepresented litigant may
participate in the program only upon his or her request, which shall be
documented in the case file, after said party has been presented with
sufficient information in plain language concerning the program; (B) a
party not represented by counsel who has chosen to participate in the
program shall be afforded the opportunity to opt out of the program for
any reason via presentation of a prescribed form to be filed with the
clerk of the court where the proceeding is pending; and (C) a court may
exempt any attorney from being required to participate in the program
upon application for such exemption, showing good cause therefor.
(e)(i) Nothing in this section shall affect or change any existing
laws governing the sealing and confidentiality of court records in
criminal proceedings or access to court records by the parties to such
proceedings, nor shall this section be construed to compel a party to
file a sealed document by electronic means.
(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no paper or
document that is filed by electronic means in a criminal proceeding
shall be available for public inspection on-line. Subject to the
provisions of existing laws governing the sealing and confidentiality of
court records, nothing herein shall prevent the unified court system
from sharing statistical information that does not include any papers or
documents filed with the action; and, provided further, that this
paragraph shall not prohibit the chief administrator, in the exercise of
his or her discretion, from posting papers or documents that have not
been sealed pursuant to law on a public website maintained by the
unified court system where: (A) the website is not the website
established by the rules promulgated pursuant to paragraph (a) of this
subdivision, and (B) to do so would be in the public interest. For
purposes of this subparagraph, the chief administrator, in determining
whether posting papers or documents on a public website is in the public
interest, shall, at a minimum, take into account for each posting the
following factors: (A) the type of case involved; (B) whether such
posting would cause harm to any person, including especially a minor or
crime victim; (C) whether such posting would include lewd or scandalous
matters; and (D) the possibility that such papers or documents may
ultimately be sealed.
(iii) Nothing in this section shall affect or change existing laws
governing service of process, nor shall this section be construed to
abrogate existing personal service requirements as set forth in the
criminal procedure law.
3. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the
following meanings:
(a) "Consent of the criminal defense bar" shall mean that consent has
been obtained from all provider offices and/or organizations in the
county that represented twenty-five percent or more of the persons
represented by public defense providers pursuant to section seven
hundred twenty-two of the county law, as shown in the most recent annual
reports filed pursuant to subdivision one of section seven hundred
twenty-two-f of the county law. Such consent, when given, must be
expressed in a written document that is provided by a person who is
authorized to consent on behalf of the relevant public defender
organization, agency or office; and
(b) "Electronic means" shall be as defined in subdivision (f) of rule
twenty-one hundred three of the civil practice law and rules; and
(c) The "filing and service of papers in pending criminal actions and
proceedings" shall include the filing and service of a notice of appeal
pursuant to section 460.10 of this chapter.
TITLE C General Principles Relating to Requirements For and Exemptions From Criminal Prosecution
ARTICLE 20 Geographical Jurisdiction of Offenses
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; definitions of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "This state" means New York State as its boundaries are prescribed
in the state law, and the space over it.
2. "County" means any of the sixty-two counties of this state as its
boundaries are prescribed by law, and the space over it.
3. "Result of an offense." When a specific consequence, such as the
death of the victim in a homicide case, is an element of an offense, the
occurrence of such consequence constitutes the "result" of such offense.
An offense of which a result is an element is a "result offense."
4. "Particular effect of an offense." When conduct constituting an
offense produces consequences which, though not necessarily amounting to
a result or element of such offense, have a materially harmful impact
upon the governmental processes or community welfare of a particular
jurisdiction, or result in the defrauding of persons in such
jurisdiction, such conduct and offense have a "particular effect" upon
such jurisdiction.
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; jurisdiction of state.
Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 20.30, a
person may be convicted in the criminal courts of this state of an
offense defined by the laws of this state, committed either by his own
conduct or by the conduct of another for which he is legally accountable
pursuant to section 20.00 of the penal law, when:
1. Conduct occurred within this state sufficient to establish:
(a) An element of such offense; or
(b) An attempt to commit such offense; or
(c) A conspiracy or criminal solicitation to commit such offense, or
otherwise to establish the complicity of at least one of the persons
liable therefor; provided that the jurisdiction accorded by this
paragraph extends only to conviction of those persons whose
conspiratorial or other conduct of complicity occurred within this
state; or
2. Even though none of the conduct constituting such offense may have
occurred within this state:
(a) The offense committed was a result offense and the result
occurred within this state. If the offense was one of homicide, it is
presumed that the result, namely the death of the victim, occurred
within this state if the victim's body or a part thereof was found
herein; or
(b) The statute defining the offense is designed to prevent the
occurrence of a particular effect in this state and the conduct
constituting the offense committed was performed with intent that it
would have such effect herein; or
(c) The offense committed was an attempt to commit a crime within
this state; or
(d) The offense committed was conspiracy to commit a crime within
this state and an overt act in furtherance of such conspiracy occurred
within this state; or
3. The offense committed was one of omission to perform within this
state a duty imposed by the laws of this state. In such case, it is
immaterial whether such person was within or outside this state at the
time of the omission.
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; effect of laws of other
jurisdictions upon this state's jurisdiction.
1. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 20.20, the courts of
this state do not have jurisdiction to convict a person of an alleged
offense partly committed within this state but consummated in another
jurisdiction, or an offense of criminal solicitation, conspiracy or
attempt in this state to commit a crime in another jurisdiction, or an
offense of criminal facilitation in this state of a felony committed in
another jurisdiction, unless the conduct constituting the consummated
offense or, as the case may be, the conduct constituting the crime
solicited, conspiratorially contemplated or facilitated, constitutes an
offense under the laws of such other jurisdiction as well as under the
laws of this state.
2. The courts of this state are not deprived of the jurisdiction
accorded them by section 20.20 to convict a person of an offense defined
by the laws of this state, partly committed in another jurisdiction but
consummated in this state, or an offense of attempt or conspiracy in
another jurisdiction to commit in this state a crime defined by the laws
of this state, by the circumstance that the conduct constituting the
consummated offense or, as the case may be, the crime attempted or
conspiratorially contemplated, does not constitute an offense under the
laws of such other jurisdiction.
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; jurisdiction of counties.
A person may be convicted in an appropriate criminal court of a
particular county, of an offense of which the criminal courts of this
state have jurisdiction pursuant to section 20.20, committed either by
his or her own conduct or by the conduct of another for which he or she
is legally accountable pursuant to section 20.00 of the penal law, when:
1. Conduct occurred within such county sufficient to establish:
(a) An element of such offense; or
(b) An attempt or a conspiracy to commit such offense; or
2. Even though none of the conduct constituting such offense may have
occurred within such county:
(a) The offense committed was a result offense and the result occurred
in such county; or
(b) The offense committed was one of homicide and the victim's body or
a part thereof was found in such county; or
(c) Such conduct had, or was likely to have, a particular effect upon
such county or a political subdivision or part thereof, and was
performed with intent that it would, or with knowledge that it was
likely to, have such particular effect therein; or
(d) The offense committed was attempt, conspiracy or criminal
solicitation to commit a crime in such county; or
(e) The offense committed was criminal facilitation of a felony
committed in such county; or
3. The offense committed was one of omission to perform a duty imposed
by law, which duty either was required to be or could properly have been
performed in such county. In such case, it is immaterial whether such
person was within or outside such county at the time of the omission; or
4. Jurisdiction of such offense is accorded to the courts of such
county pursuant to any of the following rules:
(a) An offense of abandonment of a child or non-support of a child may
be prosecuted in (i) any county in which such child resided during the
period of abandonment or non-support, or (ii) any county in which such
person resided during such period, or (iii) any county in which such
person was present during such period, provided that he was arrested for
such offense in such county or the criminal action therefor was
commenced while he was present therein.
(b) An offense of bigamy may be prosecuted either in the county in
which such offense was committed or in (i) any county in which bigamous
cohabitation subsequently occurred, or (ii) any county in which such
person was present after the commission of the offense, provided that he
was arrested for such offense in such county or the criminal action
therefor was commenced while he was present therein.
(c) An offense committed within five hundred yards of the boundary of
a particular county, and in an adjoining county of this state, may be
prosecuted in either such county.
(d) An offense committed anywhere on the Hudson river southward of the
northern boundary of New York City, or anywhere on New York bay between
Staten Island and Long Island, may be prosecuted in any of the five
counties of New York City.
(e) An offense committed upon any bridge or in any tunnel having
terminals in different counties may be prosecuted in any terminal
county.
(f) An offense committed on board a railroad train, aircraft or
omnibus operating as a common carrier may be prosecuted in any county
through or over which such common carrier passed during the particular
trip, or in any county in which such trip terminated or was scheduled to
terminate.
(g) An offense committed in a private vehicle during a trip thereof
extending through more than one county may be prosecuted in any county
through which such vehicle passed in the course of such trip.
(h) An offense committed on board a vessel navigating or lying in any
river, canal or lake flowing through or situated within this state, may
be prosecuted in any county bordering upon such body of water, or in
which it is located, or through which it passes; and if such offense was
committed upon a vessel operating as a common carrier, it may be
prosecuted in any county bordering upon any body of water upon which
such vessel navigated or passed during the particular trip.
(i) An offense committed in the Atlantic Ocean within two nautical
miles from the shore at high water mark may be prosecuted in an
appropriate court of the county the shore line of which is closest to
the point where the offense was committed. A crime committed more than
two nautical miles from the shore but within the boundary of this state
may be prosecuted in the supreme court of the county the shore line of
which is closest to the point where the crime was committed.
(j) An offense of forgery may be prosecuted in any county in which the
defendant, or another for whose conduct the defendant is legally
accountable pursuant to section 20.00 of the penal law, possessed the
instrument.
(k) An offense of offering of a false instrument for filing, or of
larceny by means of a false pretense therein, may be prosecuted (i) in
any county in which such instrument was executed, in whole or in part,
or (ii) in any county in which any of the goods or services for which
payment or reimbursement is sought by means of such instrument were
purported to have been provided.
(l) An offense of identity theft or unlawful possession of personal
identifying information and all criminal acts committed as part of the
same criminal transaction as defined in subdivision two of section 40.10
of this chapter may be prosecuted (i) in any county in which part of the
offense took place regardless of whether the defendant was actually
present in such county, or (ii) in the county in which the person who
suffers financial loss resided at the time of the commission of the
offense, or (iii) in the county where the person whose personal
identifying information was used in the commission of the offense
resided at the time of the commission of the offense. The law
enforcement agency of any such county shall take a police report of the
matter and provide the complainant with a copy of such report at no
charge.
(m) An offense under the tax law or the penal law of filing a false or
fraudulent return, report, document, declaration, statement, or filing,
or of tax evasion, fraud, or larceny resulting from the filing of a
false or fraudulent return, report, document, declaration, or filing in
connection with the payment of taxes to the state or a political
subdivision of the state, may be prosecuted in any county in which an
underlying transaction reflected, reported or required to be reflected
or reported, in whole or part, on such return, report, document,
declaration, statement, or filing occurred.
(n) (i) An organized retail theft crime, where the defendant knows
that such crime is a part of a coordinated plan, scheme or venture of
organized retail theft crimes committed by two or more persons, may be
prosecuted in any county in which such defendant committed at least one
such organized retail theft crime; provided, however, that the county of
prosecution is contiguous to another county in which one or more of such
other organized retail theft crimes was committed. Multiple organized
retail theft crimes committed by the same defendant may be joined in one
indictment if authorized and appropriate in accordance with the
provisions of section 200.20 of this chapter, provided, however, that
notwithstanding section 200.40 of this chapter, no more than one
defendant may be charged in the same indictment or prosecuted as part of
the same trial under this paragraph. For purposes of this paragraph, the
five counties that comprise New York city shall be deemed contiguous
with each other.
(ii) For purposes of this paragraph, "organized retail theft crime"
shall mean the crime of larceny, including by trick, fraud,
embezzlement, stealing or false pretenses, of retail merchandise in
quantities that would not normally be purchased for personal use or
consumption, for the purposes of reselling, trading, or otherwise
reentering such retail merchandise in commerce.
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; jurisdiction of cities,
towns and villages.
1. The principles prescribed in section 20.40, governing geographical
jurisdiction over offenses as between counties of this state, are, where
appropriate, applicable to the determination of geographical
jurisdiction over offenses as between cities, towns and villages within
a particular county unless a different determination is required by the
provisions of some other express provision of statute.
2. Where an offense prosecutable in a local criminal court is
committed in a city other than New York City, or in a town or village,
but within one hundred yards of any other such political subdivision, it
may be prosecuted in either such political subdivision.
Geographical jurisdiction of offenses; communications and
transportation of property between jurisdictions.
For purposes of this article:
1. An oral or written statement made by a person in one jurisdiction
to a person in another jurisdiction by means of telecommunication, mail
or any other method of communication is deemed to be made in each such
jurisdiction.
2. A person who causes property to be transported from one
jurisdiction to another by means of mail, common carrier or any other
method is deemed to have personally transported it in each jurisdiction,
and if delivery is made in the second jurisdiction he is deemed to have
personally made such delivery therein.
3. A person who causes by any means the use of a computer or computer
service in one jurisdiction from another jurisdiction is deemed to have
personally used the computer or computer service in each jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 30 Timeliness of Prosecutions and Speedy Trial
Timeliness of prosecutions; periods of limitation.
1. A criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation
prescribed in the ensuing subdivisions of this section.
2. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision three:
(a) A prosecution for a class A felony, or rape in the first degree as
defined in section 130.35 of the penal law, or a crime defined or
formerly defined in section 130.50 of the penal law, or aggravated
sexual abuse in the first degree as defined in section 130.70 of the
penal law, or course of sexual conduct against a child in the first
degree as defined in section 130.75 of the penal law, or incest in the
first degree as defined in section 255.27 of the penal law may be
commenced at any time;
(a-1) A prosecution for rape in the second degree as defined in
subdivision two of section 130.30 of the penal law, or criminal sexual
act in the second degree as defined in subdivision two of section 130.45
of the penal law, or incest in the second degree as defined in section
255.26 of the penal law (where the crime committed is rape in the second
degree as defined in subdivision two of section 130.30 of the penal law
or criminal sexual act in the second degree as defined in subdivision
two of section 130.45) must be commenced within twenty years after the
commission thereof or within ten years from when the offense is first
reported to law enforcement, whichever occurs earlier;
(a-2) A prosecution for rape in the third degree as defined in
subdivision one or three of section 130.25 of the penal law, or criminal
sexual act in the third degree as defined in subdivision one or three of
section 130.40 of the penal law must be commenced within ten years after
the commission thereof;
(b) A prosecution for any other felony must be commenced within five
years after the commission thereof;
(c) A prosecution for a misdemeanor must be commenced within two years
after the commission thereof;
(d) A prosecution for a petty offense must be commenced within one
year after the commission thereof.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision two, the periods of
limitation for the commencement of criminal actions are extended as
follows in the indicated circumstances:
(a) A prosecution for larceny committed by a person in violation of a
fiduciary duty may be commenced within one year after the facts
constituting such offense are discovered or, in the exercise of
reasonable diligence, should have been discovered by the aggrieved party
or by a person under a legal duty to represent him who is not himself
implicated in the commission of the offense.
(b) A prosecution for any offense involving misconduct in public
office by a public servant including, without limitation, an offense
defined in article four hundred ninety-six of the penal law, may be
commenced against a public servant, or any other person acting in
concert with such public servant at any time during such public
servant's service in such office or within five years after the
termination of such service; provided however, that in no event shall
the period of limitation be extended by more than five years beyond the
period otherwise applicable under subdivision two of this section.
(c) A prosecution for any crime set forth in title twenty-seven or
article seventy-one of the environmental conservation law may be
commenced within four years after the facts constituting such crime are
discovered or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have been
discovered by a public servant who has the responsibility to enforce the
provisions of said title and article.
(d) A prosecution for any misdemeanor set forth in the tax law or
chapter forty-six of the administrative code of the city of New York
must be commenced within three years after the commission thereof.
(e) A prosecution for course of sexual conduct against a child in the
second degree as defined in section 130.80 of the penal law may be
commenced within five years of the commission of the most recent act of
sexual conduct.
(f) For purposes of a prosecution involving a sexual offense as
defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law, other than a
sexual offense delineated in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of this
section, committed against a child less than eighteen years of age,
incest in the first, second or third degree as defined in sections
255.27, 255.26 and 255.25 of the penal law committed against a child
less than eighteen years of age, or use of a child in a sexual
performance as defined in section 263.05 of the penal law, the period of
limitation shall not begin to run until the child has reached the age of
twenty-three or the offense is reported to a law enforcement agency or
statewide central register of child abuse and maltreatment, whichever
occurs earlier.
(g) A prosecution for any felony defined in article four hundred
ninety of the penal law must be commenced within eight years after the
commission thereof provided, however, that in a prosecution for a felony
defined in article four hundred ninety of the penal law, if the
commission of such felony offense resulted in, or created a foreseeable
risk of, death or serious physical injury to another person, the
prosecution may be commenced at any time; provided, however, that
nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to shorten or otherwise lessen
the period, defined in any other applicable law, in which a prosecution
for a felony designated in this paragraph may be commenced.
(h) A prosecution for any felony related to a deed theft or where
there is fraud in connection with a transaction involving real property
must be commenced within five years after the commission of the crime,
or within two years after the facts constituting such offense are
discovered by the aggrieved party, whichever occurs later.
4. In calculating the time limitation applicable to commencement of a
criminal action, the following periods shall not be included:
(a) Any period following the commission of the offense during which
(i) the defendant was continuously outside this state or (ii) the
whereabouts of the defendant were continuously unknown and continuously
unascertainable by the exercise of reasonable diligence. However, in no
event shall the period of limitation be extended by more than five years
beyond the period otherwise applicable under subdivision two.
(b) When a prosecution for an offense is lawfully commenced within the
prescribed period of limitation therefor, and when an accusatory
instrument upon which such prosecution is based is subsequently
dismissed by an authorized court under directions or circumstances
permitting the lodging of another charge for the same offense or an
offense based on the same conduct, the period extending from the
commencement of the thus defeated prosecution to the dismissal of the
accusatory instrument does not constitute a part of the period of
limitation applicable to commencement of prosecution by a new charge.
Speedy trial; in general.
1. After a criminal action is commenced, the defendant is entitled to
a speedy trial.
2. Insofar as is practicable, the trial of a criminal action must be
given preference over civil cases; and the trial of a criminal action
where the defendant has been committed to the custody of the sheriff
during the pendency of the criminal action must be given preference over
other criminal actions.
Speedy trial; time limitations.
1. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision three of this section,
a motion made pursuant to paragraph (e) of subdivision one of section
170.30 or paragraph (g) of subdivision one of section 210.20 of this
chapter must be granted where the people are not ready for trial within:
(a) six months of the commencement of a criminal action wherein a
defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a
felony;
(b) ninety days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein a
defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a
misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three
months and none of which is a felony;
(c) sixty days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein the
defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a
misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of not more than
three months and none of which is a crime punishable by a sentence of
imprisonment of more than three months; or
(d) thirty days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein the
defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a
violation and none of which is a crime.
(e) for the purposes of this subdivision, the term offense shall
include vehicle and traffic law infractions.
2. Except as provided in subdivision three of this section, where a
defendant has been committed to the custody of the sheriff or the office
of children and family services in a criminal action he or she must be
released on bail or on his or her own recognizance, upon such conditions
as may be just and reasonable, if the people are not ready for trial in
that criminal action within:
(a) ninety days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the
custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in
a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more
offenses, at least one of which is a felony;
(b) thirty days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the
custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in
a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more
offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a
sentence of imprisonment of more than three months and none of which is
a felony;
(c) fifteen days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the
custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in
a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more
offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a
sentence of imprisonment of not more than three months and none of which
is a crime punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three
months; or
(d) five days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the
custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in
a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more
offenses, at least one of which is a violation and none of which is a
crime.
(e) for the purposes of this subdivision, the term offense shall
include vehicle and traffic law infractions.
3. (a) Subdivisions one and two of this section do not apply to a
criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of an offense defined
in sections 125.10, 125.15, 125.20, 125.25, 125.26 and 125.27 of the
penal law.
(b) A motion made pursuant to subdivisions one or two of this section
upon expiration of the specified period may be denied where the people
are not ready for trial if the people were ready for trial prior to the
expiration of the specified period and their present unreadiness is due
to some exceptional fact or circumstance, including, but not limited to,
the sudden unavailability of evidence material to the people's case,
when the district attorney has exercised due diligence to obtain such
evidence and there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence
will become available in a reasonable period.
(c) A motion made pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall
not:
(i) apply to any defendant who is serving a term of imprisonment for
another offense;
(ii) require the release from custody of any defendant who is also
being held in custody pending trial of another criminal charge as to
which the applicable period has not yet elapsed;
(iii) prevent the redetention of or otherwise apply to any defendant
who, after being released from custody pursuant to this section or
otherwise, is charged with another crime or violates the conditions on
which he has been released, by failing to appear at a judicial
proceeding at which his presence is required or otherwise.
4. In computing the time within which the people must be ready for
trial pursuant to subdivisions one and two of this section, the
following periods must be excluded:
(a) a reasonable period of delay resulting from other proceedings
concerning the defendant, including but not limited to: proceedings for
the determination of competency and the period during which defendant is
incompetent to stand trial; demand to produce; request for a bill of
particulars; pre-trial motions; appeals; trial of other charges; and the
period during which such matters are under consideration by the court;
or
(b) the period of delay resulting from a continuance granted by the
court at the request of, or with the consent of, the defendant or his or
her counsel. The court may grant such a continuance only if it is
satisfied that postponement is in the interest of justice, taking into
account the public interest in the prompt dispositions of criminal
charges. A defendant without counsel must not be deemed to have
consented to a continuance unless he or she has been advised by the
court of his or her rights under these rules and the effect of his
consent, which must be done on the record in open court; or
(c) (i) the period of delay resulting from the absence or
unavailability of the defendant. A defendant must be considered absent
whenever his location is unknown and he is attempting to avoid
apprehension or prosecution, or his location cannot be determined by due
diligence. A defendant must be considered unavailable whenever his
location is known but his presence for trial cannot be obtained by due
diligence; or
(ii) where the defendant has either escaped from custody or has failed
to appear when required after having previously been released on bail or
on his own recognizance, and provided the defendant is not in custody on
another matter, the period extending from the day the court issues a
bench warrant pursuant to section 530.70 of this chapter because of the
defendant's failure to appear in court when required, to the day the
defendant subsequently appears in the court pursuant to a bench warrant
or voluntarily or otherwise; or
(d) a reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for
trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial pursuant to this
section has not run and good cause is not shown for granting a
severance; or
(e) the period of delay resulting from detention of the defendant in
another jurisdiction provided the district attorney is aware of such
detention and has been diligent and has made reasonable efforts to
obtain the presence of the defendant for trial; or
(f) the period during which the defendant is without counsel through
no fault of the court; except when the defendant is proceeding as his
own attorney with the permission of the court; or
(g) other periods of delay occasioned by exceptional circumstances,
including but not limited to, the period of delay resulting from a
continuance granted at the request of a district attorney if (i) the
continuance is granted because of the unavailability of evidence
material to the people's case, when the district attorney has exercised
due diligence to obtain such evidence and there are reasonable grounds
to believe that such evidence will become available in a reasonable
period; or (ii) the continuance is granted to allow the district
attorney additional time to prepare the people's case and additional
time is justified by the exceptional circumstances of the case. Any such
exclusion when a statement of unreadiness has followed a statement of
readiness made by the people must be evaluated by the court after
inquiry on the record as to the reasons for the people's unreadiness and
shall only be approved upon a showing of sufficient supporting facts; or
(h) the period during which an action has been adjourned in
contemplation of dismissal pursuant to sections 170.55, 170.56 and
215.10 of this chapter; or
(i) the period prior to the defendant's actual appearance for
arraignment in a situation in which the defendant has been directed to
appear by the district attorney pursuant to subdivision three of section
120.20 or subdivision three of section 210.10 of this chapter; or
(j) the period during which a family offense is before a family court
until such time as an accusatory instrument or indictment is filed
against the defendant alleging a crime constituting a family offense, as
such term is defined in section 530.11 of this chapter.
5. (a) Whenever pursuant to this section a prosecutor states or
otherwise provides notice that the people are ready for trial, the court
shall make inquiry on the record as to their actual readiness. If, after
conducting its inquiry, the court determines that the people are not
ready to proceed to trial, the prosecutor's statement or notice of
readiness shall not be valid for purposes of this section. The court may
deem the people not ready for trial based on the people's failure to
comply with the provisions of article two hundred forty-five of this
chapter only if it finds that the people's certificate of compliance
that accompanied or preceded the people's statement of readiness at
issue was invalid under section 245.50 of this chapter.
(b) Pursuant to section 245.50 of this chapter, the certificate of
compliance is deemed invalid when the court determined that the people
did not exercise due diligence and, in making such determination, the
court looked at the totality of the prosecution's efforts to comply with
the provisions of article two hundred forty-five of this chapter, rather
than assess the prosecution's efforts item by item, and considered the
factors relevant to assessing due diligence, which include, but are not
limited to: the efforts made by the prosecutor to comply with the
requirements of article two hundred forty-five of this chapter; the
volume of discovery provided and the volume of discovery outstanding;
the complexity of the case; whether the prosecutor knew that the
belatedly disclosed or allegedly missing material existed; the
explanation for any alleged discovery lapse; the prosecutor's response
when apprised of any allegedly missing discovery; whether the belated
discovery was substantively duplicative, insignificant, or easily
remedied; whether the omission was corrected; whether the prosecution
self-reported the error and took prompt remedial action without court
intervention; and whether the prosecution's delayed disclosure of
discovery was prejudicial to the defense or otherwise impeded the
defense's ability to effectively investigate the case or prepare for
trial.
5-a. Upon a local criminal court accusatory instrument, a statement of
readiness shall not be valid unless the prosecuting attorney certifies
that all counts charged in the accusatory instrument meet the
requirements of sections 100.15 and 100.40 of this chapter and those
counts not meeting the requirements of sections 100.15 and 100.40 of
this chapter have been dismissed.
6. An order finally denying a motion to dismiss pursuant to
subdivision one of this section shall be reviewable upon an appeal from
an ensuing judgment of conviction notwithstanding the fact that such
judgment is entered upon a plea of guilty.
7. For purposes of this section, (a) where the defendant is to be
tried following the withdrawal of the plea of guilty or is to be retried
following a mistrial, an order for a new trial or an appeal or
collateral attack, the criminal action and the commitment to the custody
of the sheriff or the office of children and family services, if any,
must be deemed to have commenced on the date the withdrawal of the plea
of guilty or the date the order occasioning a retrial becomes final;
(b) where a defendant has been served with an appearance ticket, the
criminal action must be deemed to have commenced on the date the
defendant first appears in a local criminal court in response to the
ticket;
(c) where a criminal action is commenced by the filing of a felony
complaint, and thereafter, in the course of the same criminal action
either the felony complaint is replaced with or converted to an
information, prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint pursuant
to article one hundred eighty of this chapter or a prosecutor's
information is filed pursuant to section 190.70 of this chapter, the
period applicable for the purposes of subdivision one must be the period
applicable to the charges in the new accusatory instrument, calculated
from the date of the filing of such new accusatory instrument; provided,
however, that when the aggregate of such period and the period of time,
excluding the periods provided in subdivision four, already elapsed from
the date of the filing of the felony complaint to the date of the filing
of the new accusatory instrument exceeds six months, the period
applicable to the charges in the felony complaint must remain applicable
and continue as if the new accusatory instrument had not been filed;
(d) where a criminal action is commenced by the filing of a felony
complaint, and thereafter, in the course of the same criminal action
either the felony complaint is replaced with or converted to an
information, prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint pursuant
to article one hundred eighty of this chapter or a prosecutor's
information is filed pursuant to section 190.70 of this chapter, the
period applicable for the purposes of subdivision two of this section
must be the period applicable to the charges in the new accusatory
instrument, calculated from the date of the filing of such new
accusatory instrument; provided, however, that when the aggregate of
such period and the period of time, excluding the periods provided in
subdivision four of this section, already elapsed from the date of the
filing of the felony complaint to the date of the filing of the new
accusatory instrument exceeds ninety days, the period applicable to the
charges in the felony complaint must remain applicable and continue as
if the new accusatory instrument had not been filed.
(e) where a count of an indictment is reduced to charge only a
misdemeanor or petty offense and a reduced indictment or a prosecutor's
information is filed pursuant to subdivisions one-a and six of section
210.20 of this chapter, the period applicable for the purposes of
subdivision one of this section must be the period applicable to the
charges in the new accusatory instrument, calculated from the date of
the filing of such new accusatory instrument; provided, however, that
when the aggregate of such period and the period of time, excluding the
periods provided in subdivision four of this section, already elapsed
from the date of the filing of the indictment to the date of the filing
of the new accusatory instrument exceeds six months, the period
applicable to the charges in the indictment must remain applicable and
continue as if the new accusatory instrument had not been filed;
(f) where a count of an indictment is reduced to charge only a
misdemeanor or petty offense and a reduced indictment or a prosecutor's
information is filed pursuant to subdivisions one-a and six of section
210.20 of this chapter, the period applicable for the purposes of
subdivision two of this section must be the period applicable to the
charges in the new accusatory instrument, calculated from the date of
the filing of such new accusatory instrument; provided, however, that
when the aggregate of such period and the period of time, excluding the
periods provided in subdivision four of this section, already elapsed
from the date of the filing of the indictment to the date of the filing
of the new accusatory instrument exceeds ninety days, the period
applicable to the charges in the indictment must remain applicable and
continue as if the new accusatory instrument had not been filed.
8. The procedural rules prescribed in subdivisions one through seven
of section 210.45 of this chapter with respect to a motion to dismiss an
indictment are not applicable to a motion made pursuant to subdivision
two of this section. If, upon oral argument, a time period is in
dispute, the court must promptly conduct a hearing in which the people
must prove that the time period is excludable.
ARTICLE 40 Exemption From Prosecution By Reason of Previous Prosecution
Previous prosecution; definitions of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "Offense." An "offense" is committed whenever any conduct is
performed which violates a statutory provision defining an offense; and
when the same conduct or criminal transaction violates two or more such
statutory provisions each such violation constitutes a separate and
distinct offense. The same conduct or criminal transaction also
establishes separate and distinct offenses when, though violating only
one statutory provision, it results in death, injury, loss or other
consequences to two or more victims, and such result is an element of
the offense as defined. In such case, as many offenses are committed as
there are victims.
2. "Criminal transaction" means conduct which establishes at least
one offense, and which is comprised of two or more or a group of acts
either (a) so closely related and connected in point of time and
circumstance of commission as to constitute a single criminal incident,
or (b) so closely related in criminal purpose or objective as to
constitute elements or integral parts of a single criminal venture.
Previous prosecution; when a bar to second prosecution.
1. A person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense.
2. A person may not be separately prosecuted for two offenses based
upon the same act or criminal transaction unless:
(a) The offenses as defined have substantially different elements and
the acts establishing one offense are in the main clearly
distinguishable from those establishing the other; or
(b) Each of the offenses as defined contains an element which is not
an element of the other, and the statutory provisions defining such
offenses are designed to prevent very different kinds of harm or evil;
or
(c) One of such offenses consists of criminal possession of contraband
matter and the other offense is one involving the use of such contraband
matter, other than a sale thereof; or
(d) One of the offenses is assault or some other offense resulting in
physical injury to a person, and the other offense is one of homicide
based upon the death of such person from the same physical injury, and
such death occurs after a prosecution for the assault or other
non-homicide offense; or
(e) Each offense involves death, injury, loss or other consequence to
a different victim; or
(f) One of the offenses consists of a violation of a statutory
provision of another jurisdiction, which offense has been prosecuted in
such other jurisdiction and has there been terminated by a court order
expressly founded upon insufficiency of evidence to establish some
element of such offense which is not an element of the other offense,
defined by the laws of this state; or
(g) The present prosecution is for a consummated result offense, as
defined in subdivision three of section 20.10, which occurred in this
state and the offense was the result of a conspiracy, facilitation or
solicitation prosecuted in another state.
(h) One of such offenses is enterprise corruption in violation of
section 460.20 of the penal law, racketeering in violation of federal
law or any comparable offense pursuant to the law of another state and a
separate or subsequent prosecution is not barred by section 40.50 of
this article.
(i) One of the offenses consists of a violation of 18 U.S.C. 371,
where the object of the conspiracy is to attempt in any manner to evade
or defeat any federal income tax or the payment thereof, or a violation
of 26 U.S.C. 7201, 26 U.S.C. 7202, 26 U.S.C. 7203, 26 U.S.C. 7204, 26
U.S.C. 7205, 26 U.S.C. 7206 or 26 U.S.C. 7212(A), where the purpose is
to evade or defeat any federal income tax or the payment thereof, and
the other offense is committed for the purpose of evading or defeating
any New York state or New York city income taxes and is defined in
article one hundred fifty-five of the penal law, article one hundred
seventy of the penal law, article one hundred seventy-five of the penal
law, article thirty-seven of the tax law or chapter forty of title
eleven of the administrative code of the city of New York.
Previous prosecution; what constitutes.
1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person "is
prosecuted" for an offense, within the meaning of section 40.20, when he
is charged therewith by an accusatory instrument filed in a court of
this state or of any jurisdiction within the United States, and when the
action either:
(a) Terminates in a conviction upon a plea of guilty; or
(b) Proceeds to the trial stage and a jury has been impaneled and
sworn or, in the case of a trial by the court without a jury, a witness
is sworn.
2. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision
one, a person is not deemed to have been prosecuted for an offense,
within the meaning of section 40.20, when:
(a) Such prosecution occurred in a court which lacked jurisdiction
over the defendant or the offense; or
(b) Such prosecution was for a lesser offense than could have been
charged under the facts of the case, and the prosecution was procured by
the defendant, without the knowledge of the appropriate prosecutor, for
the purpose of avoiding prosecution for a greater offense.
3. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision
one, if such proceedings are subsequently nullified by a court order
which restores the action to its pre-pleading status or which directs a
new trial of the same accusatory instrument, the nullified proceedings
do not bar further prosecution of such offense under the same accusatory
instrument.
4. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision
one, if such proceedings are subsequently nullified by a court order
which dismisses the accusatory instrument but authorizes the people to
obtain a new accusatory instrument charging the same offense or an
offense based upon the same conduct, the nullified proceedings do not
bar further prosecution of such offense under any new accusatory
instrument obtained pursuant to such court order or authorization.
Separate prosecution of jointly prosecutable offenses; when
barred.
1. Where two or more offenses are joinable in a single accusatory
instrument against a person by reason of being based upon the same
criminal transaction, pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision two of
section 200.20, such person may not, under circumstances prescribed in
this section, be separately prosecuted for such offenses even though
such separate prosecutions are not otherwise barred by any other section
of this article.
2. When (a) one of two or more joinable offenses of the kind
specified in subdivision one is charged in an accusatory instrument, and
(b) another is not charged therein, or in any other accusatory
instrument filed in the same court, despite possession by the people of
evidence legally sufficient to support a conviction of the defendant for
such uncharged offense, and (c) either a trial of the existing
accusatory instrument is commenced or the action thereon is disposed of
by a plea of guilty, any subsequent prosecution for the uncharged
offense is thereby barred.
3. When (a) two or more of such offenses are charged in separate
accusatory instruments filed in the same court, and (b) an application
by the defendant for consolidation thereof for trial purposes, pursuant
to subdivision five of section 200.20 or section 100.45, is improperly
denied, the commencement of a trial of one such accusatory instrument
bars any subsequent prosecution upon any of the other accusatory
instruments with respect to any such offense.
Previous prosecution; enterprise corruption.
1. The following definitions are applicable to this section:
(a) A criminal act or offense is "specifically included" when a count
of an accusatory instrument charging a person with enterprise corruption
alleges a pattern of criminal activity and the act or offense is alleged
to be a criminal act within such pattern.
(b) A criminal act is "a part of" a pattern of criminal activity
alleged in a count of enterprise corruption when it is committed prior
to commencement of the criminal action in which enterprise corruption is
charged and was committed in furtherance of the same common scheme or
plan or with intent to participate in or further the affairs of the same
criminal enterprise to which the crimes specifically included in the
pattern are connected.
(c) A person "is prosecuted" for an offense when he is prosecuted for
it within the meaning of section 40.30 of this article or when an
indictment or a count of an indictment charging that offense is
dismissed pursuant to section 210.20 of this chapter without
authorization to submit the charge to the same or another grand jury, or
the indictment or the count of the indictment charging that offense is
dismissed following the granting of a motion to suppress pursuant to
article 710 of this chapter, unless an appeal from the order granting
the motion to dismiss or suppress is pending.
(d) An offense was "not prosecutable" in an accusatory instrument in
which a person was charged with enterprise corruption when there was no
geographical jurisdiction of that offense in the county where the
accusatory instrument was filed, or when the offense was prosecutable in
the county and was not barred from prosecution by section 40.20 or 40.40
of this article or by any other provision of law but the prosecutor
filing the accusatory instrument was not empowered by law to prosecute
the offense.
2. A person who has been previously prosecuted for an offense may not
be subsequently prosecuted for enterprise corruption based upon a
pattern of criminal activity in which that prior offense, or another
offense based upon the same act or criminal transaction, is specifically
included unless:
(a) he was convicted of that prior offense; and
(b) the subsequent pattern of criminal activity in which he
participated includes at least one criminal act for which he was not
previously prosecuted, which was a felony, and which occurred after that
prior conviction.
3. A person who has been previously prosecuted for enterprise
corruption may not be subsequently prosecuted for an offense
specifically included in the pattern of criminal activity upon which it
was based, or another offense based upon the same act or criminal
transaction, unless the offense is a class A felony and was not
prosecutable in the accusatory instrument in which the person was
charged with enterprise corruption.
4. A person may not be separately prosecuted for enterprise corruption
and for an offense specifically included in the pattern of criminal
activity upon which it is based or another offense based upon the same
act or transaction, unless the offense is a class A felony and is not
prosecutable in the accusatory instrument in which the person is charged
with enterprise corruption.
5. A person who has been previously prosecuted for enterprise
corruption may not be subsequently prosecuted for an offense which,
while not specifically included in the pattern of criminal activity on
which the prior charge of enterprise corruption was based, was
nonetheless a part of that pattern, unless the offense was a class A or
B felony and either the offense was not prosecutable in the accusatory
instrument in which the person was charged with enterprise corruption or
the people show, by clear and convincing evidence, that the prosecutor
did not possess evidence legally sufficient to support a conviction of
that offense at the time of the earlier prosecution and evidence of that
offense was not presented as part of the case in chief in the earlier
prosecution.
6. A person who has been previously prosecuted for enterprise
corruption may not be subsequently prosecuted for enterprise corruption
based upon a pattern of criminal activity that specifically includes a
criminal act that was also specifically included in the pattern upon
which the prior charge of enterprise corruption was based.
7. A person may not be separately prosecuted for enterprise corruption
in two accusatory instruments based upon a pattern of criminal activity,
alleged in either instrument, that specifically includes a criminal act
that is also specifically included in the pattern upon which the other
charge of enterprise corruption is based.
8. When a person is charged in an accusatory instrument with both one
or more counts of enterprise corruption and with another offense or
offenses specifically included in or otherwise a part of the pattern or
patterns of criminal activity upon which the charge or charges of
enterprise corruption is or are based, and the court orders that any of
the counts be tried separately pursuant to subdivision one of section
200.40 of this chapter, this section shall not apply and subsequent
prosecution of the remaining counts or offenses shall not be barred.
9. A person who has been previously prosecuted for racketeering
pursuant to federal law, or any comparable offense pursuant to the law
of another state may not be subsequently prosecuted for enterprise
corruption based upon a pattern of criminal activity that specifically
includes a criminal act that was also specifically included in the
pattern of racketeering activity upon which the prior charge of
racketeering was based provided, however, that this section shall not be
construed to prohibit the subsequent prosecution of any other offense
specifically included in or otherwise a part of a pattern of
racketeering activity alleged in any such prior prosecution for
racketeering or other comparable offense.
Previous prosecution: presidential reprieve, pardon or other
form of clemency.
When a person has been granted a reprieve, pardon or other form of
clemency for an offense pursuant to the authority granted in section two
of article two of the United States constitution, a separate or
subsequent prosecution of an offense is not barred under this article
when the people demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that:
1. (a) such person served in or was employed by the executive branch
of the government of the United States on the executive staff of the
president, in the executive office of the president, or in an acting or
confirmed capacity in a position subject to confirmation by the United
States senate, at a time when the president granting such reprieve,
pardon or other form of clemency served as president or vice-president
of the United States; or (b) such person was directly or indirectly
employed by, or acted as an agent of, the election, transition or
re-election campaign of the president granting such reprieve, pardon or
other form of clemency or any for-profit or not-for-profit entity owned
or controlled by the president granting such reprieve, pardon or other
form of clemency; or
2. such person was, at the time the president granted such reprieve,
pardon or other form of clemency, related by consanguinity or affinity
within the sixth degree to the president granting such reprieve, pardon
or other form of clemency; or
3. such person bears accessorial liability, as defined in section
20.00 of the penal law, or conspiratorial liability, within the meaning
of article one hundred five of the penal law, for such offense with one
or more persons described in subdivision one or two of this section; or
4. the president who granted such reprieve, pardon or other form of
clemency to such person (a) was thereby aided in avoiding potential
prosecution or conviction; (b) knowingly obtained a benefit from such
offense; or (c) knowingly obtained a tangible, material benefit from or
on behalf of such person; or
5. such person possessed or possesses information material to the
determination of any criminal or civil investigation, enforcement action
or prosecution of the president granting such reprieve, pardon or other
form of clemency, or of one or more persons described in subdivision
one, two or three of this section.
ARTICLE 50 Compulsion of Evidence By Offer of Immunity
Compulsion of evidence by offer of immunity; definitions of
terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "Immunity." A person who has been a witness in a legal
proceeding, and who cannot, except as otherwise provided in this
subdivision, be convicted of any offense or subjected to any penalty or
forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter or thing
concerning which he gave evidence therein, possesses "immunity" from any
such conviction, penalty or forfeiture. A person who possesses such
immunity may nevertheless be convicted of perjury as a result of having
given false testimony in such legal proceeding, and may be convicted of
or adjudged in contempt as a result of having contumaciously refused to
give evidence therein.
2. "Legal proceeding" means a proceeding in or before any court or
grand jury, or before any body, agency or person authorized by law to
conduct the same and to administer the oath or to cause it to be
administered.
3. "Give evidence" means to testify or produce physical evidence.
Compulsion of evidence by offer of immunity.
1. Any witness in a legal proceeding, other than a grand jury
proceeding, may refuse to give evidence requested of him on the ground
that it may tend to incriminate him and he may not, except as provided
in subdivision two, be compelled to give such evidence.
2. Such a witness may be compelled to give evidence in such a
proceeding notwithstanding an assertion of his privilege against
self-incrimination if:
(a) The proceeding is one in which, by express provision of statute,
a person conducting or connected therewith is declared a competent
authority to confer immunity upon witnesses therein; and
(b) Such competent authority (i) orders such witness to give the
requested evidence notwithstanding his assertion of his privilege
against self-incrimination, and (ii) advises him that upon so doing he
will receive immunity.
3. A witness who is ordered to give evidence pursuant to subdivision
two and who complies with such order receives immunity. Such witness is
not deprived of such immunity because such competent authority did not
comply with statutory provisions requiring notice to a specified public
servant of intention to confer immunity.
4. A witness who, without asserting his privilege against
self-incrimination, gives evidence in a legal proceeding other than a
grand jury proceeding does not receive immunity.
5. The rules governing the circumstances in which witnesses may be
compelled to give evidence and in which they receive immunity therefor
in a grand jury proceeding are prescribed in section 190.40.
Authority to confer immunity in criminal proceedings; court a
competent authority.
In any criminal proceeding, other than a grand jury proceeding, the
court is a competent authority to confer immunity in accordance with the
provisions of section 50.20, but only when expressly requested by the
district attorney to do so.
TITLE D Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters
ARTICLE 60 Rules of Evidence and Related Matters
Rules of evidence; in general.
Unless otherwise provided by statute or by judicially established
rules of evidence applicable to criminal cases, the rules of evidence
applicable to civil cases are, where appropriate, also applicable to
criminal proceedings.
Rules of evidence; what witnesses may be called.
1. Unless otherwise expressly provided, in any criminal proceeding
involving a defendant in which evidence is or may be received, both the
people and the defendant may as a matter of right call and examine
witnesses, and each party may cross-examine every witness called by the
other party.
2. A defendant may testify in his own behalf, but his failure to do
so is not a factor from which any inference unfavorable to him may be
drawn.
Rules of evidence; testimonial capacity; evidence given by
children.
1. Any person may be a witness in a criminal proceeding unless the
court finds that, by reason of infancy or mental disease or defect, he
does not possess sufficient intelligence or capacity to justify the
reception of his evidence.
2. Every witness more than nine years old may testify only under oath
unless the court is satisfied that such witness cannot, as a result of
mental disease or defect, understand the nature of an oath. A witness
less than nine years old may not testify under oath unless the court is
satisfied that he or she understands the nature of an oath. If under
either of the above provisions, a witness is deemed to be ineligible to
testify under oath, the witness may nevertheless be permitted to give
unsworn evidence if the court is satisfied that the witness possesses
sufficient intelligence and capacity to justify the reception thereof. A
witness understands the nature of an oath if he or she appreciates the
difference between truth and falsehood, the necessity for telling the
truth, and the fact that a witness who testifies falsely may be
punished.
3. A defendant may not be convicted of an offense solely upon unsworn
evidence given pursuant to subdivision two.
Rules of evidence; corroboration of accomplice testimony.
1. A defendant may not be convicted of any offense upon the testimony
of an accomplice unsupported by corroborative evidence tending to
connect the defendant with the commission of such offense.
2. An "accomplice" means a witness in a criminal action who,
according to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be
considered to have participated in:
(a) The offense charged; or
(b) An offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or
conduct which constitute the offense charged.
3. A witness who is an accomplice as defined in subdivision two is no
less such because a prosecution or conviction of himself would be barred
or precluded by some defense or exemption, such as infancy, immunity or
previous prosecution, amounting to a collateral impediment to such a
prosecution or conviction, not affecting the conclusion that such
witness engaged in the conduct constituting the offense with the mental
state required for the commission thereof.
Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous
recognition, in absence of present identification.
1. In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission of
an offense is in issue, testimony as provided in subdivision two may be
given by a witness when:
(a) Such witness testifies that:
(i) He or she observed the person claimed by the people to be the
defendant either at the time and place of the commission of the offense
or upon some other occasion relevant to the case; and
(ii) On a subsequent occasion he or she observed, under circumstances
consistent with such rights as an accused person may derive under the
constitution of this state or of the United States, a person or, where
the observation is made pursuant to a blind or blinded procedure as
defined in paragraph (c) of this subdivision, a pictorial, photographic,
electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction of a person whom he or
she recognized as the same person whom he or she had observed on the
first or incriminating occasion; and
(iii) He or she is unable at the proceeding to state, on the basis of
present recollection, whether or not the defendant is the person in
question; and
(b) It is established that the defendant is in fact the person whom
the witness observed and recognized or whose pictorial, photographic,
electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction the witness observed
and recognized on the second occasion. Such fact may be established by
testimony of another person or persons to whom the witness promptly
declared his or her recognition on such occasion and by such pictorial,
photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction.
(c) For purposes of this section, a "blind or blinded procedure" is
one in which the witness identifies a person in an array of pictorial,
photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproductions under
circumstances where, at the time the identification is made, the public
servant administering such procedure: (i) does not know which person in
the array is the suspect, or (ii) does not know where the suspect is in
the array viewed by the witness. The failure of a public servant to
follow such a procedure shall be assessed solely for purposes of this
article and shall result in the preclusion of testimony regarding the
identification procedure as evidence in chief, but shall not constitute
a legal basis to suppress evidence made pursuant to subdivision six of
section 710.20 of this chapter. This article neither limits nor expands
subdivision six of section 710.20 of this chapter.
2. Under circumstances prescribed in subdivision one of this section,
such witness may testify at the criminal proceeding that the person whom
he or she observed and recognized or whose pictorial, photographic,
electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction he or she observed and
recognized on the second occasion is the same person whom he or she
observed on the first or incriminating occasion. Such testimony,
together with the evidence that the defendant is in fact the person whom
the witness observed and recognized or whose pictorial, photographic,
electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction he or she observed and
recognized on the second occasion, constitutes evidence in chief.
Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous
recognition, in addition to present identification.
In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission of an
offense is in issue, a witness who testifies that (a) he or she observed
the person claimed by the people to be the defendant either at the time
and place of the commission of the offense or upon some other occasion
relevant to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection, the
defendant is the person in question and (c) on a subsequent occasion he
or she observed the defendant, or where the observation is made pursuant
to a blind or blinded procedure, as defined in paragraph (c) of
subdivision one of section 60.25 of this article, a pictorial,
photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction of the
defendant, under circumstances consistent with such rights as an accused
person may derive under the constitution of this state or of the United
States, and then also recognized him or her or the pictorial,
photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction of him
or her as the same person whom he or she had observed on the first or
incriminating occasion, may, in addition to making an identification of
the defendant at the criminal proceeding on the basis of present
recollection as the person whom he or she observed on the first or
incriminating occasion, also describe his or her previous recognition of
the defendant and testify that the person whom he or she observed or
whose pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded
reproduction he or she observed on such second occasion is the same
person whom he or she had observed on the first or incriminating
occasion. Such testimony and such pictorial, photographic, electronic,
filmed or video recorded reproduction constitutes evidence in chief.
Rules of evidence; impeachment of own witness by proof of prior
contradictory statement.
1. When, upon examination by the party who called him, a witness in a
criminal proceeding gives testimony upon a material issue of the case
which tends to disprove the position of such party, such party may
introduce evidence that such witness has previously made either a
written statement signed by him or an oral statement under oath
contradictory to such testimony.
2. Evidence concerning a prior contradictory statement introduced
pursuant to subdivision one may be received only for the purpose of
impeaching the credibility of the witness with respect to his testimony
upon the subject, and does not constitute evidence in chief. Upon
receiving such evidence at a jury trial, the court must so instruct the
jury.
3. When a witness has made a prior signed or sworn statement
contradictory to his testimony in a criminal proceeding upon a material
issue of the case, but his testimony does not tend to disprove the
position of the party who called him and elicited such testimony,
evidence that the witness made such prior statement is not admissible,
and such party may not use such prior statement for the purpose of
refreshing the recollection of the witness in a manner that discloses
its contents to the trier of the facts.
Rules of evidence; proof of previous conviction; when allowed.
1. If in the course of a criminal proceeding, any witness, including
a defendant, is properly asked whether he was previously convicted of a
specified offense and answers in the negative or in an equivocal manner,
the party adverse to the one who called him may independently prove such
conviction. If in response to proper inquiry whether he has ever been
convicted of any offense the witness answers in the negative or in an
equivocal manner, the adverse party may independently prove any previous
conviction of the witness.
2. If a defendant in a criminal proceeding, through the testimony of
a witness called by him, offers evidence of his good character, the
people may independently prove any previous conviction of the defendant
for an offense the commission of which would tend to negate any
character trait or quality attributed to the defendant in such witness'
testimony.
3. Subject to the limitations prescribed in section 200.60, the
people may prove that a defendant has been previously convicted of an
offense when the fact of such previous conviction constitutes an element
of the offense charged, or proof thereof is otherwise essential to the
establishment of a legally sufficient case.
Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexual
conduct in sex offense cases.
Evidence of a victim's sexual conduct shall not be admissible in a
prosecution for an offense or an attempt to commit an offense defined in
article one hundred thirty or in section 230.34 of the penal law unless
such evidence:
1. proves or tends to prove specific instances of the victim's prior
sexual conduct with the accused; or
2. proves or tends to prove that the victim has been convicted of an
offense under section 230.00 of the penal law within three years prior
to the sex offense which is the subject of the prosecution; or
3. rebuts evidence introduced by the people of the victim's failure to
engage in vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact, anal sexual
contact or sexual contact during a given period of time; or
4. rebuts evidence introduced by the people which proves or tends to
prove that the accused is the cause of pregnancy or disease of the
victim, or the source of semen found in the victim; or
5. is determined by the court after an offer of proof by the accused
outside the hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court may
require, and a statement by the court of its findings of fact essential
to its determination, to be relevant and admissible in the interests of
justice.
Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexual
conduct in non-sex offense cases.
Evidence of the victim's sexual conduct, including the past sexual
conduct of a deceased victim, may not be admitted in a prosecution for
any offense, attempt to commit an offense or conspiracy to commit an
offense defined in the penal law unless such evidence is determined by
the court to be relevant and admissible in the interests of justice,
after an offer of proof by the proponent of such evidence outside the
hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court may require, and a
statement by the court of its findings of fact essential to its
determination.
Use of anatomically correct dolls.
Any person who is less than sixteen years old may in the discretion of
the court and where helpful and appropriate, use an anatomically correct
doll in testifying in a criminal proceeding based upon conduct
prohibited by article one hundred thirty, article two hundred sixty or
Rules of evidence; admissibility of statements of defendants.
1. Evidence of a written or oral confession, admission, or other
statement made by a defendant with respect to his participation or lack
of participation in the offense charged, may not be received in evidence
against him in a criminal proceeding if such statement was involuntarily
made.
2. A confession, admission or other statement is "involuntarily made"
by a defendant when it is obtained from him:
(a) By any person by the use or threatened use of physical force upon
the defendant or another person, or by means of any other improper
conduct or undue pressure which impaired the defendant's physical or
mental condition to the extent of undermining his ability to make a
choice whether or not to make a statement; or
(b) By a public servant engaged in law enforcement activity or by a
person then acting under his direction or in cooperation with him:
(i) by means of any promise or statement of fact, which promise or
statement creates a substantial risk that the defendant might falsely
incriminate himself; or
(ii) in violation of such rights as the defendant may derive from the
constitution of this state or of the United States.
3. (a) Where a person is subject to custodial interrogation by a
public servant at a detention facility, the entire custodial
interrogation, including the giving of any required advice of the rights
of the individual being questioned, and the waiver of any rights by the
individual, shall be recorded by an appropriate video recording device
if the interrogation involves a class A-1 felony, except one defined in
article two hundred twenty of the penal law; felony offenses defined in
section 130.95 and 130.96 of the penal law; or a felony offense defined
in article one hundred twenty-five or one hundred thirty of such law
that is defined as a class B violent felony offense in section 70.02 of
the penal law. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "detention
facility" shall mean a police station, correctional facility, holding
facility for prisoners, prosecutor's office or other facility where
persons are held in detention in connection with criminal charges that
have been or may be filed against them.
(b) No confession, admission or other statement shall be subject to a
motion to suppress pursuant to subdivision three of section 710.20 of
this chapter based solely upon the failure to video record such
interrogation in a detention facility as defined in paragraph (a) of
this subdivision. However, where the people offer into evidence a
confession, admission or other statement made by a person in custody
with respect to his or her participation or lack of participation in an
offense specified in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, that has not
been video recorded, the court shall consider the failure to record as a
factor, but not as the sole factor, in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this subdivision in determining whether such confession, admission or
other statement shall be admissible.
(c) Notwithstanding the requirement of paragraph (a) of this
subdivision, upon a showing of good cause by the prosecutor, the
custodial interrogation need not be recorded. Good cause shall include,
but not be limited to:
(i) If electronic recording equipment malfunctions.
(ii) If electronic recording equipment is not available because it was
otherwise being used.
(iii) If statements are made in response to questions that are
routinely asked during arrest processing.
(iv) If the statement is spontaneously made by the suspect and not in
response to police questioning.
(v) If the statement is made during an interrogation that is conducted
when the interviewer is unaware that a qualifying offense has occurred.
(vi) If the statement is made at a location other than the "interview
room" because the suspect cannot be brought to such room, e.g., the
suspect is in a hospital or the suspect is out of state and that state
is not governed by a law requiring the recordation of an interrogation.
(vii) If the statement is made after a suspect has refused to
participate in the interrogation if it is recorded, and appropriate
effort to document such refusal is made.
(viii) If such statement is not recorded as a result of an inadvertent
error or oversight, not the result of any intentional conduct by law
enforcement personnel.
(ix) If it is law enforcement's reasonable belief that such recording
would jeopardize the safety of any person or reveal the identity of a
confidential informant.
(x) If such statement is made at a location not equipped with a video
recording device and the reason for using that location is not to
subvert the intent of the law. For purposes of this section, the term
"location" shall include those locations specified in paragraph (b) of
subdivision four of section 305.2 of the family court act.
(d) In the event the court finds that the people have not shown good
cause for the non-recording of the confession, admission, or other
statement, but determines that a non-recorded confession, admission or
other statement is nevertheless admissible because it was voluntarily
made then, upon request of the defendant, the court must instruct the
jury that the people's failure to record the defendant's confession,
admission or other statement as required by this section may be weighed
as a factor, but not as the sole factor, in determining whether such
confession, admission or other statement was voluntarily made, or was
made at all.
(e) Video recording as required by this section shall be conducted in
accordance with standards established by rule of the division of
criminal justice services.
Rules of evidence, family offense proceedings in family court.
Evidence of a written or oral admission or any testimony given by
either party, or evidence derived therefrom, in a proceeding under
article eight of the family court act without the benefit of counsel in
such proceeding may not be received into evidence in a criminal
proceeding except for the purposes of impeachment unless such party
waives the right to counsel on the record. Nothing herein shall be
deemed to prohibit any testimony or exhibits received into evidence in a
criminal proceeding, or any orders, decisions or judgments arising from
such proceeding from being received into evidence in any proceeding
under article eight of the family court act.
Possession of condoms; receipt into evidence.
Evidence that a person was in possession of one or more condoms may
not be admitted at any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in a
prosecution for section 230.00 of the penal law for the purpose of
establishing probable cause for an arrest or proving any person's
commission or attempted commission of such offense.
Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's manner
of dress in sex offense cases.
Evidence of the manner in which the victim was dressed at the time of
the commission of an offense may not be admitted in a prosecution for
any offense, or an attempt to commit an offense, defined in article one
hundred thirty of the penal law, unless such evidence is determined by
the court to be relevant and admissible in the interests of justice,
after an offer of proof by the proponent of such evidence outside the
hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court may require, and a
statement by the court of its findings of fact essential to its
determination.
Possession of opioid antagonists; receipt into evidence.
1. Evidence that a person was in possession of an opioid antagonist
may not be admitted at any trial, hearing or other proceeding in a
prosecution for any offense under sections 220.03, 220.06, 220.09,
220.16, 220.18, or 220.21 of the penal law for the purpose of
establishing probable cause for an arrest or proving any person's
commission of such offense.
2. For the purposes of this section, opioid antagonist is defined as a
drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration that, when
administered, negates or neutralizes in whole or in part the
pharmacological effects of an opioid in the body and shall be limited to
naloxone and other medications approved by the department of health for
such purpose.
Rules of evidence; statements of defendants; corroboration.
A person may not be convicted of any offense solely upon evidence of a
confession or admission made by him without additional proof that the
offense charged has been committed.
Rules of evidence; psychiatric testimony in certain cases.
1. When, in connection with the affirmative defense of lack of
criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect, a
psychiatrist or licensed psychologist testifies at a trial concerning
the defendant's mental condition at the time of the conduct charged to
constitute a crime, he must be permitted to make a statement as to the
nature of any examination of the defendant, the diagnosis of the mental
condition of the defendant and his opinion as to the extent, if any, to
which the capacity of the defendant to know or appreciate the nature and
consequence of such conduct, or its wrongfulness, was impaired as a
result of mental disease or defect at that time.
The psychiatrist or licensed psychologist must be permitted to make
any explanation reasonably serving to clarify his diagnosis and opinion,
and may be cross-examined as to any matter bearing on his competency or
credibility or the validity of his diagnosis or opinion.
2. Any statement made by the defendant to a psychiatrist or licensed
psychologist during his examination of the defendant shall be
inadmissible in evidence on any issue other than that of the affirmative
defense of lack of criminal responsibility, by reason of mental disease
or defect. The statement shall, however, be admissible upon the issue of
the affirmative defense of lack of criminal responsibility by reason of
mental disease or defect, whether or not it would otherwise be deemed a
privileged communication. Upon receiving the statement in evidence, the
court must instruct the jury that the statement is to be considered only
on the issue of such affirmative defense and may not be considered by it
in its determination of whether the defendant committed the act
constituting the crime charged.
Rules of evidence; certificates concerning judgments of
conviction and fingerprints.
1. A certificate issued by a criminal court, or the clerk thereof,
certifying that a judgment of conviction against a designated defendant
has been entered in such court, constitutes presumptive evidence of the
facts stated in such certificate.
2. A report of a public servant charged with the custody of official
fingerprint records which contains a certification that the fingerprints
of a designated person who has previously been convicted of an offense
are identical with those of a defendant in a criminal action,
constitutes presumptive evidence of the fact that such defendant has
previously been convicted of such offense.
Rules of evidence; dangerous drugs destroyed pursuant to court
order.
The destruction of dangerous drugs pursuant to the provisions of
article seven hundred fifteen hereof shall not preclude the admission on
trial or in a proceeding in connection therewith of testimony or
evidence where such testimony or evidence would otherwise have been
admissible if such drugs had not been destroyed.
Rules of evidence; chemical test evidence.
In any prosecution where two or more offenses against the same
defendant are properly joined in one indictment or charged in two
accusatory instruments properly consolidated for trial purposes and
where one such offense charges a violation of any subdivision of section
eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, chemical test
evidence properly admissible as evidence of intoxication under
subdivision one of section eleven hundred ninety-five of such law shall
also, if relevant, be received in evidence with regard to the remaining
charges in the indictments.
Rules of evidence; rape crisis counselor evidence in certain
cases.
Where disclosure of a communication which would have been privileged
pursuant to section forty-five hundred ten of the civil practice law and
rules is sought on the grounds that the privilege has been waived or
that disclosure is required pursuant to the constitution of this state
or the United States, the party seeking disclosure must file a written
motion supported by an affidavit containing specific factual allegations
providing grounds that disclosure is required. Upon the filing of such
motion and affidavit, the court shall conduct an in camera review of the
communication outside the presence of the jury and of counsel for all
parties in order to determine whether disclosure of any portion of the
communication is required.
ARTICLE 65 Use of Closed-circuit Television For Certain Child Witnesses
* § 65.00 Definitions.
As used in this article:
1. "Child witness" means a person fourteen years old or less who is or
will be called to testify in a criminal proceeding, other than a grand
jury proceeding, concerning an offense defined in article one hundred
thirty of the penal law or section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of such law
which is the subject of such criminal proceeding.
2. "Vulnerable child witness" means a child witness whom a court has
declared to be vulnerable.
3. "Testimonial room" means any room, separate and apart from the
courtroom, which is furnished comfortably and less formally than a
courtroom and from which the testimony of a vulnerable child witness can
be transmitted to the courtroom by means of live, two-way closed-circuit
television.
4. "Live, two-way closed-circuit television" means a simultaneous
transmission, by closed-circuit television, or other electronic means,
between the courtroom and the testimonial room in accordance with the
provisions of section 65.30.
5. "Operator" means the individual authorized by the court to operate
the closed-circuit television equipment used in accordance with the
provisions of this article.
6. A person occupies "a position of authority with respect to a child"
when he or she is a parent, guardian or other person responsible for the
custody or care of the child at the relevant time or is any other person
who maintains an ongoing personal relationship with such parent,
guardian or other person responsible for custody or care, which
relationship involves his or her living, or his or her frequent and
repeated presence, in the same household or premises as the child.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
* § 65.10 Closed-circuit television; general rule; declaration of
vulnerability.
1. A child witness shall be declared vulnerable when the court, in
accordance with the provisions of section 65.20, determines by clear and
convincing evidence that it is likely that such child witness will
suffer serious mental or emotional harm if required to testify at a
criminal proceeding without the use of live, two-way closed-circuit
television and that the use of such live, two-way closed-circuit
television will diminish the likelihood or extent of, such harm.
2. When the court declares a child witness to be vulnerable, it shall,
except as provided in subdivision four of section 65.30, authorize the
taking of the testimony of the vulnerable child witness from the
testimonial room by means of live, two-way closed-circuit television.
Under no circumstances shall the provisions of this article be construed
to authorize a closed-circuit television system by which events in the
courtroom are not transmitted to the testimonial room during the
testimony of the vulnerable child witness.
3. Nothing herein shall be contrued to preclude the court from
exercising its power to close the courtroom or from exercising any
authority it otherwise may have to protect the well-being of a witness
and the rights of the defendant.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
* § 65.20 Closed-circuit television; procedure for application and
grounds for determination.
1. Prior to the commencement of a criminal proceeding; other than a
grand jury proceeding, either party may apply to the court for an order
declaring that a child witness is vulnerable.
2. A child witness should be declared vulnerable when the court, in
accordance with the provisions of this section, determines by clear and
convincing evidence that the child witness would suffer serious mental
or emotional harm that would substantially impair the child witness'
ability to communicate with the finder of fact without the use of live,
two-way closed-circuit television.
3. A motion pursuant to subdivision one of this section must be made
in writing at least eight days before the commencement of trial or other
criminal proceeding upon reasonable notice to the other party and with
an opportunity to be heard.
4. The motion papers must state the basis for the motion and must
contain sworn allegations of fact which, if true, would support a
determination by the court that the child witness is vulnerable. Such
allegations may be based upon the personal knowledge of the deponent or
upon information and belief, provided that, in the latter event, the
sources of such information and the grounds for such belief are stated.
5. The answering papers may admit or deny any of the alleged facts and
may, in addition, contain sworn allegations of fact relevant to the
motion, including the rights of the defendant, the need to protect the
child witness and the integrity of the truth-finding function of the
trier of fact.
6. Unless all material facts alleged in support of the motion made
pursuant to subdivision one of this section are conceded, the court
shall, in addition to examining the papers and hearing oral argument,
conduct an appropriate hearing for the purpose of making findings of
fact essential to the determination of the motion. Except as provided in
subdivision six of this section, it may subpoena or call and examine
witnesses, who must either testify under oath or be permitted to give
unsworn testimony pursuant to subdivision two of section 60.20 and must
authorize the attorneys for the parties to do the same.
7. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the child witness who
is alleged to be vulnerable may not be compelled to testify at such
hearing or to submit to any psychological or psychiatric examination.
The failure of the child witness to testify at such hearing shall not be
a ground for denying a motion made pursuant to subdivision one of this
section. Prior statements made by the child witness relating to any
allegations of conduct constituting an offense defined in article one
hundred thirty of the penal law or incest as defined in section 255.25,
255.26 or 255.27 of such law or to any allegation of words or conduct
constituting an attempt to prevent, impede or deter the child witness
from cooperating in the investigation or prosecution of the offense
shall be admissible at such hearing, provided, however, that a
declaration that a child witness is vulnerable may not be based solely
upon such prior statements.
8. (a) Notwithstanding any of the provisions of article forty-five of
the civil practice law and rules, any physician, psychologist, nurse or
social worker who has treated a child witness may testify at a hearing
conducted pursuant to subdivision five of this section concerning the
treatment of such child witness as such treatment relates to the issue
presented at the hearing, provided that any otherwise applicable
statutory privileges concerning communications between the child witness
and such physician, psychologist, nurse or social worker in connection
with such treatment shall not be deemed waived by such testimony alone,
except to the limited extent of permitting the court alone to examine in
camera reports, records or documents, if any, prepared by such
physician, psychologist, nurse or social worker. If upon such
examination the court determines that such reports, records or
documents, or any one or portion thereof, contain information material
and relevant to the issue of whether the child witness is a vulnerable
child witness, the court shall disclose such information to both the
attorney for the defendant and the district attorney.
(b) At any time after a motion has been made pursuant to subdivision
one of this section, upon the demand of the other party the moving party
must furnish the demanding party with a copy of any and all of such
records, reports or other documents in the possession of such other
party and must, in addition, supply the court with a copy of all such
reports, records or other documents which are the subject of the demand.
At any time after a demand has been made pursuant to this paragraph, the
moving party may demand that property of the same kind or character in
possession of the party that originally made such demand be furnished to
the moving party and, if so furnished, be supplied, in addition, to the
court.
9. (a) Prior to the commencement of the hearing conducted pursuant to
subdivision six of this section, the district attorney shall, subject to
a protective order, comply with the provisions of subdivision one of
section 245.20 of this chapter as they concern any witness whom the
district attorney intends to call at the hearing and the child witness.
(b) Before a defendant calls a witness at such hearing, he or she
must, subject to a protective order, comply with the provisions of
subdivision four of section 245.20 of this chapter as they concern all
the witnesses the defendant intends to call at such hearing.
10. The court may consider, in determining whether there are factors
which would cause the child witness to suffer serious mental or
emotional harm, a finding that any one or more of the following
circumstances have been established by clear and convincing evidence:
(a) The manner of the commission of the offense of which the defendant
is accused was particularly heinous or was characterized by aggravating
circumstances.
(b) The child witness is particularly young or otherwise particularly
subject to psychological harm on account of a physical or mental
condition which existed before the alleged commission of the offense.
(c) At the time of the alleged offense, the defendant occupied a
position of authority with respect to the child witness.
(d) The offense or offenses charged were part of an ongoing course of
conduct committed by the defendant against the child witness over an
extended period of time.
(e) A deadly weapon or dangerous instrument was allegedly used during
the commission of the crime.
(f) The defendant has inflicted serious physical injury upon the child
witness.
(g) A threat, express or implied, of physical violence to the child
witness or a third person if the child witness were to report the
incident to any person or communicate information to or cooperate with a
court, grand jury, prosecutor, police officer or peace officer
concerning the incident has been made by or on behalf of the defendant.
(h) A threat, express or implied, of the incarceration of a parent or
guardian of the child witness, the removal of the child witness from the
family or the dissolution of the family of the child witness if the
child witness were to report the incident to any person or communicate
information to or cooperate with a court, grand jury, prosecutor, police
officer or peace officer concerning the incident has been made by or on
behalf of the defendant.
(i) A witness other than the child witness has received a threat of
physical violence directed at such witness or to a third person by or on
behalf of the defendant.
(j) The defendant, at the time of the inquiry, (i) is living in the
same household with the child witness, (ii) has ready access to the
child witness or (iii) is providing substantial financial support for
the child witness.
(k) The child witness has previously been the victim of an offense
defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law or incest as
defined in section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of such law.
(l) According to expert testimony, the child witness would be
particularly suceptible to psychological harm if required to testify in
open court or in the physical presence of the defendant.
11. Irrespective of whether a motion was made pursuant to subdivision
one of this section, the court, at the request of either party or on its
own motion, may decide that a child witness may be vulnerable based on
its own observations that a child witness who has been called to testify
at a criminal proceeding is suffering severe mental or emotional harm
and therefore is physically or mentally unable to testify or to continue
to testify in open court or in the physical presence of the defendant
and that the use of live, two-way closed-circuit television is necessary
to enable the child witness to testify. If the court so decides, it must
conduct the same hearing that subdivision five of this section requires
when a motion is made pursuant to subdivision one of this section, and
it must make findings of fact pursuant to subdivisions nine and eleven
of this section, before determining that the child witness is
vulnerable.
12. In deciding whether a child witness is vulnerable, the court shall
make findings of fact which reflect the causal relationship between the
existence of any one or more of the factors set forth in subdivision
nine of this section or other relevant factors which the court finds are
established and the determination that the child witness is vulnerable.
If the court is satisfied that the child witness is vulnerable and that,
under the facts and circumstances of the particular case, the
defendant's constitutional rights to an impartial jury or of
confrontation will not be impaired, it may enter an order granting the
application for the use of live, two-way closed-circuit television.
13. When the court has determined that a child witness is a vulnerable
child witness, it shall make a specific finding as to whether placing
the defendant and the child witness in the same room during the
testimony of the child witness will contribute to the likelihood that
the child witness will suffer severe mental or emotional harm. If the
court finds that placing the defendant and the child witness in the same
room during the testimony of the child witness will contribute to the
likelihood that the child witness will suffer severe mental or emotional
harm, the order entered pursuant to subdivision eleven of this section
shall direct that the defendant remain in the courtroom during the
testimony of the vulnerable child witness.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
* § 65.30 Closed-circuit television; special testimonial procedures.
1. When the court has entered an order pursuant to section 65.20, the
testimony of the vulnerable child witness shall be taken in the
testimonial room and the image and voice of the vulnerable child
witness, as well as the image of all other persons other than the
operator present in the testimonial room, shall be transmitted live by
means of closed-circuit television to the courtroom. The courtroom shall
be equipped with monitors sufficient to permit the judge, jury,
defendant and attorneys to observe the demeanor of the vulnerable child
witness during his or her testimony. Unless the courtroom has been
closed pursuant to court order, the public shall also be permitted to
hear the testimony and view the image of the vulnerable child witness.
2. In all instances, the image of the jury shall be simultaneously
transmitted to the vulnerable child witness in the testimonial room. If
the court order issued pursuant to section 65.20 specifies that the
vulnerable child witness shall testify outside the physical presence of
the defendant, the image of the defendant and the image and voice of the
person examining the vulnerable child witness shall also be
simultaneously transmitted to the vulnerable child witness in the
testimonial room.
3. The operator shall place herself or himself and the closed-circuit
television equipment in a position that permits the entire testimony of
the vulnerable child witness to be transmitted to the courtroom but
limits the ability of the vulnerable child witness to see or hear the
operator or the equipment.
4. Notwithstanding any provision of this article, if the court in a
particular case involving a vulnerable child witness determines that
there is no live, two-way closed-circuit television equipment available
in the court or another court in the county or which can be transported
to the court from another county or that such equipment, if available,
is technologically inadequate to protect the constitutional rights of
the defendant, it shall not permit the use of the closed-circuit
television procedures authorized by this article.
5. If the order of the court entered pursuant to section 65.20
requires that the defendant remain in the courtroom, the attorney for
the defendant and the district attorney shall also remain in the
courtroom unless the court is satisfied that their presence in the
testimonial room will not impede full and private communication between
the defendant and his or her attorney and will not encourage the jury to
draw an inference adverse to the interest of the defendant.
6. Upon request of the defendant, the court shall instruct the jury
that they are to draw no inference from the use of live, two-way
closed-circuit television in the examination of the vulnerable child
witness.
7. The vulnerable child witness shall testify under oath except as
specified in subdivision two of section 60.20. The examination and
cross-examination of the vulnerable child witness shall, in all other
respects, be conducted in the same manner as if the vulnerable child
witness had testified in the courtroom.
8. When the testimony of the vulnerable child witness is transmitted
from the testimonial room into the courtroom, the court stenographer
shall record the textimony in the same manner as if the vulnerable child
witness had testified in the courtroom.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
ARTICLE 70 Standards of Proof
Standards of proof; definitions of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this chapter:
1. "Legally sufficient evidence" means competent evidence which, if
accepted as true, would establish every element of an offense charged
and the defendant's commission thereof; except that such evidence is not
legally sufficient when corroboration required by law is absent.
2. "Reasonable cause to believe that a person has committed an
offense" exists when evidence or information which appears reliable
discloses facts or circumstances which are collectively of such weight
and persuasiveness as to convince a person of ordinary intelligence,
judgment and experience that it is reasonably likely that such offense
was committed and that such person committed it. Except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, such apparently reliable evidence may include
or consist of hearsay.
Standards of proof for conviction.
No conviction of an offense by verdict is valid unless based upon
trial evidence which is legally sufficient and which establishes beyond
a reasonable doubt every element of such offense and the defendant's
commission thereof.
PART 2 The Principal Proceedings
TITLE H Preliminary Proceedings In Local Criminal Court
ARTICLE 95 Pre-criminal Proceeding Settlements
* § 95.00 Pre-criminal proceeding settlement.
When a county district attorney of a county located in a city of one
million or more recovers monies before the filing of an accusatory
instrument as defined in subdivision one of section 1.20 of this
chapter, after injured parties have been appropriately compensated, the
district attorney's office shall retain a percentage of the remaining
such monies in recognition that such monies were recovered as a result
of investigations undertaken by such office. For each recovery the total
amount of such monies to be retained by the county district attorney's
office shall equal ten percent of the first twenty-five million dollars
received by such office, plus seven and one-half percent of such monies
received by such office in excess of twenty-five million dollars but
less than fifty million dollars, plus five percent of any such monies
received by such office in excess of fifty million dollars but less than
one hundred million dollars, plus one percent of such monies received by
such office in excess of one hundred million dollars. The remainder of
such monies shall be paid by the district attorney's office to the state
and to the county in equal amounts within thirty days of receipt, where
disposition of such monies is not otherwise prescribed by law. Monies
distributed to a county district attorney's office pursuant to this
section shall be used to enhance law enforcement efforts within the
state of New York. On December first of each year, every district
attorney shall provide the governor, temporary president of the senate
and speaker of the assembly with an annual report detailing the total
amount of monies received as described herein by his or her office, a
description of how and where such funds, and an itemization of funds
received in the previous ten years, were distributed by his or her
office but shall not include a description of the distribution of monies
where the disclosure of such information would interfere with a law
enforcement investigation or a judicial proceeding, and the current
total balance of monies held on deposit for state sanctioned deferred
prosecution agreements. The report shall include a detailed description
of any entity to which funds are distributed, including but not limited
to, whether it is a profit or not-for-profit entity, where it is
located, and the intended use of the monies distributed, and shall state
the law enforcement purpose.
* NB Repealed March 31, 2027
ARTICLE 100 Commencement of Action In Local Criminal Court or Youth Part of a Superior Court--accusatory Instruments
Commencement of action; in general.
A criminal action is commenced by the filing of an accusatory
instrument with a criminal court, or, in the case of a juvenile offender
or adolescent offender, other than an adolescent offender charged with
only a violation or traffic infraction, the youth part of the superior
court, and if more than one such instrument is filed in the course of
the same criminal action, such action commences when the first of such
instruments is filed. The only way in which a criminal action can be
commenced in a superior court, other than a criminal action against a
juvenile offender or adolescent offender is by the filing therewith by a
grand jury of an indictment against a defendant who has never been held
by a local criminal court for the action of such grand jury with respect
to any charge contained in such indictment. Otherwise, a criminal action
can be commenced only in a local criminal court, by the filing therewith
of a local criminal court accusatory instrument, namely:
1. An information; or
2. A simplified information; or
3. A prosecutor's information; or
4. A misdemeanor complaint; or
5. A felony complaint.
Commencement of action; effect of family court proceeding.
A criminal court shall have concurrent jurisdiction over cognizable
family offenses, as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter and in subdivision one of section eight hundred twelve of the
family court act, notwithstanding the fact that a family court has or
may be exercising jurisdiction over a petition under article eight of
the family court act containing substantially the same allegations as
are set forth in the accusatory instrument or indictment.
Local criminal court and youth part of the superior court
accusatory instruments; definitions thereof.
1. An "information" is a verified written accusation by a person,
filed with a local criminal court, charging one or more other persons
with the commission of one or more offenses, none of which is a felony.
It may serve as a basis both for the commencement of a criminal action
and for the prosecution thereof in a local criminal court.
2. (a) A "simplified traffic information" is a written accusation by a
police officer, or other public servant authorized by law to issue same,
filed with a local criminal court, which charges a person with the
commission of one or more traffic infractions and/or misdemeanors
relating to traffic, and which, being in a brief or simplified form
prescribed by the commissioner of motor vehicles, designates the offense
or offenses charged but contains no factual allegations of an
evidentiary nature supporting such charge or charges. It serves as a
basis for commencement of a criminal action for such traffic offenses,
alternative to the charging thereof by a regular information, and, under
circumstances prescribed in section 100.25, it may serve, either in
whole or in part, as a basis for prosecution of such charges.
(b) A "simplified parks information" is a written accusation by a
police officer or other public servant authorized by law to issue same,
filed with a local criminal court, which charges a person with the
commission of one or more offenses, other than a felony, for which a
uniform simplified parks information may be issued pursuant to the parks
and recreation law and navigation law, and which being in a brief or
simplified form prescribed by the commissioner of parks and recreation,
designates the offense or offenses charged but contains no factual
allegations of an evidentiary nature supporting such charge or charges.
It serves as a basis for commencement of a criminal action for such
offenses, alternative to the charging thereof by a regular information,
and, under circumstances parescribed in section 100.25, it may serve,
either in whole or in part, as a basis for prosecution of such charges.
(c) A "simplified environmental conservation information" is a written
accusation by a police officer or other public servant authorized by law
to issue same, filed with a local criminal court, which charges a person
with the commission of one or more offenses, other than a felony, for
which a uniform simplified environmental conservation information may be
issued pursuant to the environmental conservation law, and which being
in a brief or simplified form prescribed by the commissioner of
environmental conservation, designates the offense or offenses charged
but contains no factual allegations of an evidentiary nature supporting
such charge or charges. It serves as a basis for commencement of a
criminal action for such offenses, alternative to the charging thereof
by a regular information, and, under circumstances prescribed in section
100.25, it may serve, either in whole or in part, as a basis for
prosecution of such charges.
3. A "prosecutor's information" is a written accusation by a district
attorney, filed with a local criminal court, either (a) at the direction
of a grand jury pursuant to section 190.70, or (b) at the direction of a
local criminal court pursuant to section 180.50 or 180.70, or (c) at the
district attorney's own instance pursuant to subdivision two of section
100.50, or (d) at the direction of a superior court pursuant to
subdivision one-a of section 210.20, charging one or more persons with
the commission of one or more offenses, none of which is a felony. It
serves as a basis for the prosecution of a criminal action, but it
commences a criminal action only where it results from a grand jury
direction issued in a case not previously commenced in a local criminal
court.
4. A "misdemeanor complaint" is a verified written accusation by a
person, filed with a local criminal court, charging one or more other
persons with the commission of one or more offenses, at least one of
which is a misdemeanor and none of which is a felony. It serves as a
basis for the commencement of a criminal action, but it may serve as a
basis for prosecution thereof only where a defendant has waived
prosecution by information pursuant to subdivision three of section
5. A "felony complaint" is a verified written accusation by a person,
filed with a local criminal court, or youth part of the superior court,
charging one or more other persons with the commission of one or more
felonies. It serves as a basis for the commencement of a criminal
action, but not as a basis for prosecution thereof.
Information, misdemeanor complaint and felony complaint; form
and content.
1. An information, a misdemeanor complaint and a felony complaint
must each specify the name of the court with which it is filed and the
title of the action, and must be subscribed and verified by a person
known as the "complainant." The complainant may be any person having
knowledge, whether personal or upon information and belief, of the
commission of the offense or offenses charged. Each instrument must
contain an accusatory part and a factual part. The complainant's
verification of the instrument is deemed to apply only to the factual
part thereof and not to the accusatory part.
2. The accusatory part of each such instrument must designate the
offense or offenses charged. As in the case of an indictment, and
subject to the rules of joinder applicable to indictments, two or more
offenses may be charged in separate counts. Also as in the case of an
indictment, such instrument may charge two or more defendants provided
that all such defendants are jointly charged with every offense alleged
therein.
3. The factual part of such instrument must contain a statement of
the complainant alleging facts of an evidentiary character supporting or
tending to support the charges. Where more than one offense is charged,
the factual part should consist of a single factual account applicable
to all the counts of the accusatory part. The factual allegations may
be based either upon personal knowledge of the complainant or upon
information and belief. Nothing contained in this section, however,
limits or affects the requirement, prescribed in subdivision one of
section 100.40, that in order for an information or a count thereof to
be sufficient on its face, every element of the offense charged and the
defendant's commission thereof must be supported by non-hearsay
allegations of such information and/or any supporting depositions.
4. Where a felony complaint charges a violent felony offense defined
in section 70.02 of the penal law and such offense is an armed felony as
defined in subdivision forty-one of section 1.20,
(a) the accusatory part of the instrument must designate the offense
as an armed felony, and (b) the factual part of the instrument must
allege facts of an evidentiary character supporting or tending to
support such designation.
Supporting deposition; definition, form and content.
A supporting deposition is a written instrument accompanying or filed
in connection with an information, a simplified information, a
misdemeanor complaint or a felony complaint, subscribed and verified by
a person other than the complainant of such accusatory instrument, and
containing factual allegations of an evidentiary character, based either
upon personal knowledge or upon information and belief, which supplement
those of the accusatory instrument and support or tend to support the
charge or charges contained therein.
Simplified information; form and content; defendant's right to
supporting deposition; notice requirement.
1. A simplified information must be substantially in the form
prescribed by the commissioner of motor vehicles, the commissioner of
parks and recreation, or the commissioner of environmental conservation,
as the case may be.
2. A defendant charged by a simplified information is, upon a timely
request, entitled as a matter of right to have filed with the court and
served upon him, or if he is represented by an attorney, upon his
attorney, a supporting deposition of the complainant police officer or
public servant, containing allegations of fact, based either upon
personal knowledge or upon information and belief, providing reasonable
cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense or offenses
charged. To be timely, such a request must, except as otherwise provided
herein and in subdivision three of this section, be made before entry of
a plea of guilty to the charge specified and before commencement of a
trial thereon, but not later than thirty days after the date the
defendant is directed to appear in court as such date appears upon the
simplified information and upon the appearance ticket issued pursuant
thereto. If the defendant's request is mailed to the court, the request
must be mailed within such thirty day period. Upon such a request, the
court must order the complainant police officer or public servant to
serve a copy of such supporting deposition upon the defendant or his
attorney, within thirty days of the date such request is received by the
court, or at least five days before trial, whichever is earlier, and to
file such supporting deposition with the court together with proof of
service thereof. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, where a
defendant is issued an appearance ticket in conjunction with the offense
charged in the simplified information and the appearance ticket fails to
conform with the requirements of subdivision two of section 150.10, a
request is timely when made not later than thirty days after (a) entry
of the defendant's plea of not guilty when he or she has been arraigned
in person, or (b) written notice to the defendant of his or her right to
receive a supporting deposition when a plea of not guilty has been
submitted by mail.
3. When at least one of the offenses charged in a simplified
information is a misdemeanor, the court may, upon motion of the
defendant, for good cause shown and consistent with the interest of
justice, permit the defendant to request a supporting deposition beyond
the thirty day request period set forth in subdivision two of this
section provided, however, that no motion may be brought under this
subdivision after ninety days has elapsed from the date the defendant is
directed to appear in court as such date appears upon the simplified
information and upon the appearance ticket issued pursuant thereto.
4. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, where a
person is charged by a simplified information and is served with an
appearance ticket as defined in section 150.10, such appearance ticket
shall contain the following language: "NOTICE: YOU ARE ENTITLED TO
RECEIVE A SUPPORTING DEPOSITION FURTHER EXPLAINING THE CHARGES PROVIDED
YOU REQUEST SUCH SUPPORTING DEPOSITION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE
YOU ARE DIRECTED TO APPEAR IN COURT AS SET FORTH ON THIS APPEARANCE
TICKET. DO YOU REQUEST A SUPPORTING DEPOSITION?
[ ] YES
[ ] NO"
Information, misdemeanor complaint, felony complaint,
supporting deposition and proof of service of supporting
deposition; verification.
1. An information, a misdemeanor complaint, a felony complaint, a
supporting deposition, and proof of service of a supporting deposition
may be verified in any of the following manners:
(a) Such instrument may be sworn to before the court with which it is
filed.
(b) Such instrument may be sworn to before a desk officer in charge at
a police station or police headquarters or any of his superior officers.
(c) Where such instrument is filed by any public servant following the
issuance and service of an appearance ticket, and where by express
provision of law another designated public servant is authorized to
administer the oath with respect to such instrument, it may be sworn to
before such public servant.
(d) Such instrument may bear a form notice that false statements made
therein are punishable as a class A misdemeanor pursuant to section
210.45 of the penal law, and such form notice together with the
subscription of the deponent constitute a verification of the
instrument.
(e) Such instrument may be sworn to before a notary public.
2. An instrument specified in subdivision one may be verified in any
manner prescribed therein unless in a particular case the court
expressly directs verification in a particular manner prescribed in said
subdivision one.
Prosecutor's information; form and content.
A prosecutor's information must contain the name of the local criminal
court with which it is filed and the title of the action, and must be
subscribed by the district attorney by whom it is filed. Otherwise it
should be in the form prescribed for an indictment, pursuant to section
200.50, and must, in one or more counts, allege the offense or offenses
charged and a plain and concise statement of the conduct constituting
each such offense. The rules prescribed in sections 200.20 and 200.40
governing joinder of different offenses and defendants in a single
indictment are also applicable to a prosecutor's information.
Local criminal court and youth part of the superior court
accusatory instruments; sufficiency on face.
1. An information, or a count thereof, is sufficient on its face when:
(a) It substantially conforms to the requirements prescribed in
section 100.15; and
(b) The allegations of the factual part of the information, together
with those of any supporting depositions which may accompany it, provide
reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense
charged in the accusatory part of the information; and
(c) Non-hearsay allegations of the factual part of the information
and/or of any supporting depositions establish, if true, every element
of the offense charged and the defendant's commission thereof.
2. A simplified information is sufficient on its face when, as
provided by subdivision one of section 100.25, it substantially conforms
to the requirement therefor prescribed by or pursuant to law; provided
that when the filing of a supporting deposition is ordered by the court
pursuant to subdivision two of said section 100.25, a failure of the
complainant police officer or public servant to comply with such order
within the time provided by subdivision two of said section 100.25
renders the simplified information insufficient on its face.
3. A prosecutor's information, or a count thereof, is sufficient on
its face when it substantially conforms to the requirements prescribed
in section 100.35.
4. A misdemeanor complaint or a felony complaint, or a count thereof,
is sufficient on its face when:
(a) It substantially conforms to the requirements prescribed in
section 100.15; and
(b) The allegations of the factual part of such accusatory instrument
and/or any supporting depositions which may accompany it, provide
reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the offense
charged in the accusatory part of such instrument.
Information, prosecutor's information, misdemeanor complaint;
severance, consolidation, amendment, bill of particulars.
1. Where appropriate, the provisions of sections 200.20 and 200.40 and
paragraph (n) of subdivision four of section 20.40 of this chapter,
governing severance of counts of an indictment and severance of
defendants for trial purposes, and governing consolidation of
indictments for trial purposes, apply to informations, to prosecutor's
informations and to misdemeanor complaints.
2. The provisions of section 200.70 governing amendment of indictments
apply to prosecutor's informations.
3. At any time before the entry of a plea of guilty to or the
commencement of a trial of an information, the court may, upon
application of the people and with notice to the defendant and
opportunity to be heard, order the amendment of the accusatory part of
such information by addition of a count charging an offense supported by
the allegations of the factual part of such information and/or any
supporting depositions which may accompany it. In such case, the
defendant must be accorded any reasonable adjournment necessitated by
the amendment.
4. The provisions of section 200.95, governing bills of particulars
with respect to indictments, apply to informations, to misdemeanor
complaints and to prosecutor's informations.
Superseding informations and prosecutor's informations.
1. If at any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement
of a trial of an information or a prosecutor's information, another
information or, as the case may be, another prosecutor's information is
filed with the same local criminal court charging the defendant with an
offense charged in the first instrument, the first such instrument is,
with respect to such offense, superseded by the second and, upon the
defendant's arraignment upon the latter, the count of the first
instrument charging such offense must be dismissed by the court. The
first instrument is not, however, superseded with respect to any count
contained therein which charges an offense not charged in the second
instrument.
2. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of
a trial of an information, the district attorney may file with the local
criminal court a prosecutor's information charging any offenses
supported, pursuant to the standards prescribed in subdivision one of
section 100.40, by the allegations of the factual part of the original
information and/or any supporting depositions which may accompany it.
In such case, the original information is superseded by the prosecutor's
information and, upon the defendant's arraignment upon the latter, is
deemed dismissed.
3. A misdemeanor complaint must or may be replaced and superseded by
an information pursuant to the provisions of section 170.65.
Local criminal court accusatory instruments; in what courts
filed.
1. Any local criminal court accusatory instrument may be filed with a
district court of a particular county when an offense charged therein
was allegedly committed in such county or that part thereof over which
such court has jurisdiction.
2. Any local criminal court accusatory instrument may be filed with
the New York City criminal court when an offense charged therein was
allegedly committed in New York City.
3. Any local criminal court accusatory instrument may be filed with a
city court of a particular city when an offense charged therein was
allegedly committed in such city.
4. An information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint may be filed with a town court of
a particular town when an offense charged therein was allegedly
committed anywhere in such town other than in a village thereof having a
village court.
5. An information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint may be filed with a village court
of a particular village when an offense charged therein was allegedly
committed in such village.
6. A felony complaint may be filed with any town court or village
court of a particular county when a felony charged therein was allegedly
committed in some town of such county. Such court need not be that of
the town or village in which such felony was allegedly committed.
7. An information, a simplified information, a misdemeanor complaint
or a felony complaint may be filed with a judge of a superior court
sitting as a local criminal court when an offense charged therein was
allegedly committed in a county in which such judge is then present and
in which he either resides or is currently holding, or has been assigned
to hold, a term of a superior court.
8. Where it is otherwise expressly provided by law that a particular
kind of accusatory instrument may under given circumstances be filed
with a local criminal court other than one authorized by this section,
nothing contained in this section precludes the filing of such
accusatory instrument accordingly.
9. In any case where each of two or more local criminal courts is
authorized as a proper court with which to file an accusatory
instrument, such an instrument may, in the absence of an express
provision of law to the contrary, be filed with any one of such courts
but not with more than one.
10. For purposes of this section, an offense is "committed in" a
particular county, city, town, village or other specified political
subdivision or area, not only when it is in fact committed therein but
also when it is, for other reasons specified in sections 20.40 and
20.50, prosecutable in the criminal courts having geographical
jurisdiction over such political subdivision or area.
11. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a local
criminal court accusatory instrument may be filed with a local criminal
court while it is operating an off-hours arraignment part designated in
accordance with paragraph (w) of subdivision one of section two hundred
twelve of the judiciary law provided that an offense charged therein was
allegedly committed in the county in which the local criminal court is
located.
Youth part of the superior court accusatory instruments; in
what courts filed.
Any youth part of the superior court accusatory instrument may be
filed with the youth part of the superior court of a particular county
when an offense charged therein was allegedly committed in such county
or that part thereof over which such court has jurisdiction.
ARTICLE 110 Requiring Defendant's Appearance In Local Criminal Court or Youth Part of Superior Court For Arraignment
Methods of requiring defendant's appearance in local criminal
court or youth part of the superior court for arraignment; in
general.
1. After a criminal action has been commenced in a local criminal
court or youth part of the superior court by the filing of an accusatory
instrument therewith, a defendant who has not been arraigned in the
action and has not come under the control of the court may under certain
circumstances be compelled or required to appear for arraignment upon
such accusatory instrument by:
(a) The issuance and execution of a warrant of arrest, as provided in
article one hundred twenty; or
(b) The issuance and service upon him of a summons, as provided in
article one hundred thirty; or
(c) Procedures provided in articles five hundred sixty, five hundred
seventy, five hundred eighty, five hundred ninety and six hundred for
securing attendance of defendants in criminal actions who are not at
liberty within the state.
2. Although no criminal action against a person has been commenced in
any court, he may under certain circumstances be compelled or required
to appear in a local criminal court or youth part of a superior court
for arraignment upon an accusatory instrument to be filed therewith at
or before the time of his appearance by:
(a) An arrest made without a warrant, as provided in article one
hundred forty; or
(b) The issuance and service upon him of an appearance ticket, as
provided in article one hundred fifty.
Local criminal court or youth part of the superior court
accusatory instruments; notice thereof to district attorney.
When a criminal action in which a crime is charged is commenced in a
local criminal court, or youth part of the superior court other than the
criminal court of the city of New York, a copy of the accusatory
instrument shall be promptly transmitted to the appropriate district
attorney upon or prior to the arraignment of the defendant on the
accusatory instrument. If a police officer or a peace officer is the
complainant or the filer of a simplified information, or has arrested
the defendant or brought him before the local criminal court or youth
part of the superior court on behalf of an arresting person pursuant to
subdivision one of section 140.20, such officer or his agency shall
transmit the copy of the accusatory instrument to the appropriate
district attorney. In all other cases, the clerk of the court in which
the defendant is arraigned shall so transmit it.
ARTICLE 120 Warrant of Arrest
Warrant of arrest; definition, function, form and content.
1. A warrant of arrest is a process issued by a local criminal court
directing a police officer to arrest a defendant designated in an
accusatory instrument filed with such court and to bring him before such
court in connection with such instrument. The sole function of a warrant
of arrest is to achieve a defendant's court appearance in a criminal
action for the purpose of arraignment upon the accusatory instrument by
which such action was commenced.
2. A warrant of arrest must be subscribed by the issuing judge and
must state or contain (a) the name of the issuing court, and (b) the
date of issuance of the warrant, and (c) the name or title of an offense
charged in the underlying accusatory instrument, and (d) the name of the
defendant to be arrested or, if such be unknown, any name or description
by which he can be identified with reasonable certainty, and (e) the
police officer or officers to whom the warrant is addressed, and (f) a
direction that such officer arrest the defendant and bring him before
the issuing court.
3. A warrant of arrest may be addressed to a classification of police
officers, or to two or more classifications thereof, as well as to a
designated individual police officer or officers. Multiple copies of
such a warrant may be issued.
Warrant of arrest; when issuable.
1. When a criminal action has been commenced in a local criminal court
or youth part of the superior court by the filing therewith of an
accusatory instrument, other than a simplified traffic information,
against a defendant who has not been arraigned upon such accusatory
instrument and has not come under the control of the court with respect
thereto:
(a) such court may, if such accusatory instrument is sufficient on its
face, issue a warrant for such defendant's arrest; or
(b) if such accusatory instrument is not sufficient on its face as
prescribed in section 100.40, and if the court is satisfied that on the
basis of the available facts or evidence it would be impossible to draw
and file an accusatory instrument that is sufficient on its face, the
court must dismiss the accusatory instrument.
2. Even though such accusatory instrument is sufficient on its face,
the court may refuse to issue a warrant of arrest based thereon until it
has further satisfied itself, by inquiry or examination of witnesses,
that there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed
an offense charged. Upon such inquiry or examination, the court may
examine, under oath or otherwise, any available person whom it believes
may possess knowledge concerning the subject matter of the charge.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, if a summons may
be issued in lieu of a warrant of arrest pursuant to section 130.20, and
if the court is satisfied that the defendant will respond thereto, it
may not issue a warrant of arrest. Upon the request of the district
attorney, in lieu of a warrant of arrest or summons, the court may
instead authorize the district attorney to direct the defendant to
appear for arraignment on a designated date if it is satisfied that the
defendant will so appear.
Warrant of arrest; by what courts issuable and in what courts
returnable.
1. A warrant of arrest may be issued only by the local criminal court
or youth part of the superior court with which the underlying accusatory
instrument has been filed, and it may be made returnable in such issuing
court only.
2. The particular local criminal court or courts or youth part of the
superior court with which any particular local criminal court or youth
part of the superior court accusatory instrument may be filed for the
purpose of obtaining a warrant of arrest are determined, generally, by
the provisions of section 100.55 or 100.60 of this title. If, however, a
particular accusatory instrument may pursuant to said section 100.55 be
filed with a particular town court and such town court is not available
at the time such instrument is sought to be filed and a warrant
obtained, such accusatory instrument may be filed with the town court of
any adjoining town of the same county. If such instrument may be filed
pursuant to said section 100.55 with a particular village court and such
village court is not available at the time, it may be filed with the
town court of the town embracing such village, or if such town court is
not available either, with the town court of any adjoining town of the
same county.
Warrant of arrest; attaching accusatory instrument to warrant
of town court, village court or city court.
A town court, village court or city court which issues a warrant of
arrest may attach thereto a duplicate copy of the underlying accusatory
instrument. If one or more duplicate copies of the warrant are issued,
such court may attach as many copies of such accusatory instrument to
copies of such warrant as it chooses. In any case where, pursuant to
subdivision five of section 120.90, a defendant arrested upon such a
warrant of arrest is brought before a local criminal court other than
the town court, village court or city court in which the warrant is
returnable, a copy of the accusatory instrument constitutes a valid
basis for arraignment, as provided in subdivision one of section 170.15.
Warrant of arrest; to what police officers addressed.
A warrant of arrest may be addressed to any police officer or
classification of police officers whose geographical area of employment
embraces either the place where the offense charged was allegedly
committed or the locality of the court by which the warrant is issued.
Warrant of arrest; defendant under parole or probation
supervision.
If the defendant named within a warrant of arrest issued by a local
criminal court or youth part of the superior court pursuant to the
provisions of this article, or by a superior court issued pursuant to
subdivision three of section 210.10 of this chapter, is under the
supervision of the state department of corrections and community
supervision or a local or state probation department, then a warrant for
his or her arrest may be executed by a parole officer or probation
officer, when authorized by his or her probation director, within his or
her geographical area of employment. The execution of the warrant by a
parole officer or probation officer shall be upon the same conditions
and conducted in the same manner as provided for execution of a warrant
by a police officer.
Warrant of arrest; what police officers may execute.
1. A warrant of arrest may be executed by (a) any police officer to
whom it is addressed, or (b) any other police officer delegated to
execute it under circumstances prescribed in subdivisions two and three.
2. A police officer to whom a warrant of arrest is addressed may
delegate another officer to whom it is not addressed to execute such
warrant as his agent when:
(a) He has reasonable cause to believe that the defendant is in a
particular county other than the one in which the warrant is returnable;
and
(b) The warrant is, pursuant to section 120.70, executable in such
other county without endorsement by a local criminal court thereof; and
(c) The geographical area of employment of the delegated police
officer embraces the locality where the arrest is to be made.
3. Under circumstances specified in subdivision two, the police
officer to whom the warrant is addressed may inform the delegated
officer, by telecommunication, mail or any other means, of the issuance
of the warrant, of the offense charged in the underlying accusatory
instrument and of all other pertinent details, and may request him to
act as his agent in arresting the defendant pursuant to such warrant.
Upon such request, the delegated police officer is to the same extent as
the delegating officer, authorized to make such arrest pursuant to the
warrant within the geographical area of such delegated officer's
employment. Upon so arresting the defendant, he must proceed as
provided in subdivisions two and four of section 120.90.
Warrant of arrest; where executable.
1. A warrant of arrest issued by a district court, by the New York
City criminal court, the youth part of a superior court or by a superior
court judge sitting as a local criminal court may be executed anywhere
in the state.
2. A warrant of arrest issued by a city court, a town court or a
village court may be executed:
(a) In the county of issuance or in any adjoining county; or
(b) Anywhere else in the state upon the written endorsement thereon of
a local criminal court of the county in which the arrest is to be made.
When so endorsed, the warrant is deemed the process of the endorsing
court as well as that of the issuing court.
Warrant of arrest; when and how executed.
1. A warrant of arrest may be executed on any day of the week and at
any hour of the day or night.
2. Unless encountering physical resistance, flight or other factors
rendering normal procedure impractical, the arresting police officer
must inform the defendant that a warrant for his arrest for the offense
designated therein has been issued. Upon request of the defendant, the
officer must show him the warrant if he has it in his possession. The
officer need not have the warrant in his possession, and, if he has not,
he must show it to the defendant upon request as soon after the arrest
as possible.
3. In order to effect the arrest, the police officer may use such
physical force as is justifiable pursuant to section 35.30 of the penal
law.
4. In order to effect the arrest, the police officer may, under
circumstances and in the manner prescribed in this subdivision, enter
any premises in which he reasonably believes the defendant to be
present; provided, however, that where the premises in which the officer
reasonably believes the defendant to be present is the dwelling of a
third party who is not the subject of the arrest warrant, the officer
shall proceed in the manner specified in article 690 of this chapter.
Before such entry, he must give, or make reasonable effort to give,
notice of his authority and purpose to an occupant thereof, unless there
is reasonable cause to believe that the giving of such notice will:
(a) Result in the defendant escaping or attempting to escape; or
(b) Endanger the life or safety of the officer or another person; or
(c) Result in the destruction, damaging or secretion of material
evidence.
5. If the officer is authorized to enter premises without giving
notice of his authority and purpose, or if after giving such notice he
is not admitted, he may enter such premises, and by a breaking if
necessary.
Child-sensitive arrests.
A state or local law enforcement officer who arrests an individual
legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen
years old shall to the extent practicable, at the time of the arrest,
take appropriate action that is conducive to the child's safety and/or
security and is consistent with the policies and procedures established
pursuant to section two hundred fourteen-i or paragraph (f-2) of
subdivision three of section eight hundred forty of the executive law as
applicable.
Warrant of arrest; procedure after arrest.
1. Upon arresting a defendant for any offense pursuant to a warrant of
arrest in the county in which the warrant is returnable or in any
adjoining county, or upon so arresting him or her for a felony in any
other county, a police officer, if he or she be one to whom the warrant
is addressed, must without unnecessary delay bring the defendant before
the local criminal court or youth part of the superior court in which
such warrant is returnable, provided that, where a local criminal court
or youth part of the superior court in the county in which the warrant
is returnable hereunder is operating an off-hours arraignment part
designated in accordance with paragraph (w) of subdivision one of
section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law at the time of
defendant's return, such police officer may bring the defendant before
such local criminal court or youth part of the superior court.
2. Upon arresting a defendant for any offense pursuant to a warrant
of arrest in a county adjoining the county in which the warrant is
returnable, or upon so arresting him for a felony in any other county, a
police officer, if he be one delegated to execute the warrant pursuant
to section 120.60, must without unnecessary delay deliver the defendant
or cause him to be delivered to the custody of the officer by whom he
was so delegated, and the latter must then proceed as provided in
subdivision one.
3. Upon arresting a defendant for an offense other than a felony
pursuant to a warrant of arrest in a county other than the one in which
the warrant is returnable or one adjoining it, a police officer, if he
be one to whom the warrant is addressed, must inform the defendant that
he has a right to appear before a local criminal court of the county of
arrest for the purpose of being released on his own recognizance or
having bail fixed. If the defendant does not desire to avail himself of
such right, the officer must request him to endorse such fact upon the
warrant, and upon such endorsement the officer must without unnecessary
delay bring him before the court in which the warrant is returnable. If
the defendant does desire to avail himself of such right, or if he
refuses to make the aforementioned endorsement, the officer must without
unnecessary delay bring him before a local criminal court of the county
of arrest. Such court must release the defendant on his own
recognizance or fix bail for his appearance on a specified date in the
court in which the warrant is returnable. If the defendant is in
default of bail, the officer must without unnecessary delay bring him
before the court in which the warrant is returnable.
4. Upon arresting a defendant for an offense other than a felony
pursuant to a warrant of arrest in a county other than the one in which
the warrant is returnable or one adjoining it, a police officer, if he
be one delegated to execute the warrant pursuant to section 120.60, may
hold the defendant in custody in the county of arrest for a period not
exceeding two hours for the purpose of delivering him to the custody of
the officer by whom he was delegated to execute such warrant. If the
delegating officer receives custody of the defendant during such period,
he must proceed as provided in subdivision three. Otherwise, the
delegated officer must inform the defendant that he has a right to
appear before a local criminal court for the purpose of being released
on his own recognizance or having bail fixed. If the defendant does not
desire to avail himself of such right, the officer must request him to
make, sign and deliver to him a written statement of such fact, and if
the defendant does so, the officer must retain custody of him but must
without unnecessary delay deliver him or cause him to be delivered to
the custody of the delegating police officer. If the defendant does
desire to avail himself of such right, or if he refuses to make and
deliver the aforementioned statement, the delegated or arresting officer
must without unnecessary delay bring him before a local criminal court
of the county of arrest and must submit to such court a written
statement reciting the material facts concerning the issuance of the
warrant, the offense involved, and all other essential matters relating
thereto. Upon the submission of such statement, such court must release
the defendant on his own recognizance or fix bail for his appearance on
a specified date in the court in which the warrant is returnable. If
the defendant is in default of bail, the officer must retain custody of
him but must without unnecessary delay deliver him or cause him to be
delivered to the custody of the delegating officer. Upon receiving such
custody, the latter must without unnecessary delay bring the defendant
before the court in which the warrant is returnable.
5. Whenever a police officer is required pursuant to this section to
bring an arrested defendant before a town court in which a warrant of
arrest is returnable, and if such town court is not available at the
time, such officer must, if a copy of the underlying accusatory
instrument has been attached to the warrant pursuant to section 120.40,
instead bring such defendant before any village court embraced, in whole
or in part, by such town, or any local criminal court of an adjoining
town or city of the same county or any village court embraced, in whole
or in part, by such adjoining town. When the court in which the warrant
is returnable is a village court which is not available at the time, the
officer must in such circumstances bring the defendant before the town
court of the town embracing such village or any other village court
within such town or, if such town court or village court is not
available either, before the local criminal court of any town or city of
the same county which adjoins such embracing town or, before the local
criminal court of any village embraced in whole or in part by such
adjoining town. When the court in which the warrant is returnable is a
city court which is not available at the time, the officer must in such
circumstances bring the defendant before the local criminal court of any
adjoining town or village embraced in whole or in part by such adjoining
town of the same county.
5-a. Whenever a police officer is required, pursuant to this section,
to bring an arrested defendant before a youth part of a superior court
in which a warrant of arrest is returnable, and if such court is not in
session, such officer must bring such defendant before the most
accessible magistrate designated by the appellate division of the
supreme court in the applicable department to act as a youth part.
6. Before bringing a defendant arrested pursuant to a warrant before
the local criminal court or youth part of a superior court in which such
warrant is returnable, a police officer must without unnecessary delay
perform all fingerprinting and other preliminary police duties required
in the particular case. In any case in which the defendant is not
brought by a police officer before such court but, following his arrest
in another county for an offense specified in subdivision one of section
160.10, is released by a local criminal court of such other county on
his own recognizance or on bail for his appearance on a specified date
before the local criminal court before which the warrant is returnable,
the latter court must, upon arraignment of the defendant before it,
direct that he be fingerprinted by the appropriate officer or agency,
and that he appear at an appropriate designated time and place for such
purpose.
7. Upon arresting a juvenile offender or adolescent offender, the
police officer shall immediately notify the parent or other person
legally responsible for his care or the person with whom he is
domiciled, that the juvenile offender or adolescent offender has been
arrested, and the location of the facility where he is being detained.
8. Upon arresting a defendant, other than a juvenile offender, for any
offense pursuant to a warrant of arrest, a police officer shall, upon
the defendant's request, permit the defendant to communicate by
telephone provided by the law enforcement facility where the defendant
is held to a phone number located anywhere in the United States or
Puerto Rico, for the purposes of obtaining counsel and informing a
relative or friend that he or she has been arrested, unless granting the
call will compromise an ongoing investigation or the prosecution of the
defendant.
ARTICLE 130 The Summons
Summons; definition, function, form and content.
1. A summons is a process issued by a local criminal court directing a
defendant designated in an information, a prosecutor's information, a
felony complaint or a misdemeanor complaint filed with such court, or a
youth part of a superior court directing a defendant designated in a
felony complaint, or by a superior court directing a defendant
designated in an indictment filed with such court, to appear before it
at a designated future time in connection with such accusatory
instrument. The sole function of a summons is to achieve a defendant's
court appearance in a criminal action for the purpose of arraignment
upon the accusatory instrument by which such action was commenced.
2. A summons must be subscribed by the issuing judge and must state or
contain (a) the name of the issuing court, and (b) the name of the
defendant to whom it is addressed, and (c) the name or title of an
offense charged in the underlying accusatory instrument, and (d) the
date of issuance of the summons, and (e) the date and time when it is
returnable, and (f) a direction that the defendant appear before the
issuing court at such time.
Summons; by what courts issuable and in what courts returnable.
A summons may be issued only by the local criminal court or superior
court with which the accusatory instrument underlying it has been filed,
and it may be made returnable in such issuing court only.
Summons; when issuable.
A local criminal court or youth part of the superior court may issue a
summons in any case in which, pursuant to section 120.20, it is
authorized to issue a warrant of arrest based upon an information, a
prosecutor's information, a felony complaint or a misdemeanor complaint.
If such information, prosecutor's information, felony complaint or
misdemeanor complaint is not sufficient on its face as prescribed in
section 100.40, and if the court is satisfied that on the basis of the
available facts or evidence it would be impossible to draw and file an
authorized accusatory instrument that is sufficient on its face, the
court must dismiss the accusatory instrument. A superior court may issue
a summons in any case in which, pursuant to section 210.10, it is
authorized to issue a warrant of arrest based upon an indictment.
Summons; service.
1. A summons may be served by a police officer, or by a complainant
at least eighteen years old or by any other person at least eighteen
years old designated by the court.
2. A summons may be served anywhere in the county of issuance or
anywhere in an adjoining county.
Summons; defendant's failure to appear.
If after the service of a summons the defendant does not appear in the
designated local criminal court or superior court at the time such
summons is returnable, the court may issue a warrant of arrest.
Summons; fingerprinting of defendant.
1. Upon the arraignment of a defendant whose court attendance has been
secured by the issuance and service of a summons, based upon an
indictment, a prosecutor's information or upon an information, felony
complaint or misdemeanor complaint filed by a complainant who is a
police officer, the court must, if an offense charged in the accusatory
instrument is one specified in subdivision one of section 160.10, direct
that the defendant be fingerprinted by the appropriate police officer or
agency, and that he or she appear at an appropriate designated time and
place for such purpose.
2. Upon the arraignment of a defendant whose court attendance has been
secured by the issuance and service of a summons based upon an
information or misdemeanor complaint filed by a complainant who is not a
police officer, and who has not previously been fingerprinted, the court
may, if it finds reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has
committed an offense specified in subdivision one of section 160.10,
direct that the defendant be fingerprinted by the appropriate police
officer or agency and that he appear at an appropriate designated time
and place for such purpose. A defendant whose court appearance has been
secured by the issuance and service of a criminal summons based upon a
misdemeanor complaint or information filed by a complainant who is not a
police officer, must be directed by the court, upon conviction of the
defendant, to be fingerprinted by the appropriate police officer or
agency and the court must also direct that the defendant appear at an
appropriate designated time and place for such purpose, if the defendant
is convicted of any offense specified in subdivision one of section
160.10.
ARTICLE 140 Arrest Without a Warrant
Arrest without a warrant; in general.
A person who has committed or is believed to have committed an offense
and who is at liberty within the state may, under circumstances
prescribed in this article, be arrested for such offense although no
warrant of arrest therefor has been issued and although no criminal
action therefor has yet been commenced in any criminal court.
Arrest without a warrant; by police officer; when and where
authorized.
1. Subject to the provisions of subdivision two, a police officer may
arrest a person for:
(a) Any offense when he or she has reasonable cause to believe that
such person has committed such offense in his or her presence; and
(b) A crime when he or she has reasonable cause to believe that such
person has committed such crime, whether in his or her presence or
otherwise.
2. A police officer may arrest a person for a petty offense, pursuant
to subdivision one, only when:
(a) Such offense was committed or believed by him or her to have been
committed within the geographical area of such police officer's
employment or within one hundred yards of such geographical area; and
(b) Such arrest is made in the county in which such offense was
committed or believed to have been committed or in an adjoining county;
except that the police officer may follow such person in continuous
close pursuit, commencing either in the county in which the offense was
or is believed to have been committed or in an adjoining county, in and
through any county of the state, and may arrest him or her in any county
in which he or she apprehends him or her.
3. A police officer may arrest a person for a crime, pursuant to
subdivision one, whether or not such crime was committed within the
geographical area of such police officer's employment, and he or she may
make such arrest within the state, regardless of the situs of the
commission of the crime. In addition, he or she may, if necessary,
pursue such person outside the state and may arrest him or her in any
state the laws of which contain provisions equivalent to those of
section 140.55.
3-a. A police officer shall not arrest any person for any legally
protected health activity as defined in section 570.17 of this chapter.
* 4. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, a police
officer shall arrest a person, and shall not attempt to reconcile the
parties or mediate, where such officer has reasonable cause to believe
that:
(a) a felony, other than subdivision three, four, nine or ten of
section 155.30 of the penal law, has been committed by such person
against a member of the same family or household, as member of the same
family or household is defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of
this chapter; or
(b) a duly served order of protection or special order of conditions
issued pursuant to subparagraph (i) or (ii) of paragraph (o) of
subdivision one of section 330.20 of this chapter is in effect, or an
order of which the respondent or defendant has actual knowledge because
he or she was present in court when such order was issued, where the
order appears to have been issued by a court of competent jurisdiction
of this or another state, territorial or tribal jurisdiction; and
(i) Such order directs that the respondent or defendant stay away from
persons on whose behalf the order of protection or special order of
conditions has been issued and the respondent or defendant committed an
act or acts in violation of such "stay away" provision of such order; or
(ii) The respondent or defendant commits a family offense as defined
in subdivision one of section eight hundred twelve of the family court
act or subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter in violation of
such order of protection or special order of conditions.
The provisions of this subdivision shall apply only to orders of
protection issued pursuant to sections two hundred forty and two hundred
fifty-two of the domestic relations law, articles four, five, six and
eight of the family court act and section 530.12 of this chapter,
special orders of conditions issued pursuant to subparagraph (i) or (ii)
of paragraph (o) of subdivision one of section 330.20 of this chapter
insofar as they involve a victim or victims of domestic violence as
defined by subdivision one of section four hundred fifty-nine-a of the
social services law or a designated witness or witnesses to such
domestic violence, and to orders of protection issued by courts of
competent jurisdiction in another state, territorial or tribal
jurisdiction. In determining whether reasonable cause exists to make an
arrest for a violation of an order issued by a court of another state,
territorial or tribal jurisdiction, the officer shall consider, among
other factors, whether the order, if available, appears to be valid on
its face or whether a record of the order exists on the statewide
registry of orders of protection and warrants established pursuant to
section two hundred twenty-one-a of the executive law or the protection
order file maintained by the national crime information center;
provided, however, that entry of the order of protection or special
order of conditions into the statewide registry or the national
protection order file shall not be required for enforcement of the
order. When a special order of conditions is in effect and a defendant
or respondent has been taken into custody pursuant to this paragraph,
nothing contained in this paragraph shall restrict or impair a police
officer from acting pursuant to section 9.41 of the mental hygiene law;
or
(c) a misdemeanor constituting a family offense, as described in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter and section eight
hundred twelve of the family court act, has been committed by such
person against such family or household member, unless the victim
requests otherwise. The officer shall neither inquire as to whether the
victim seeks an arrest of such person nor threaten the arrest of any
person for the purpose of discouraging requests for police intervention.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, when an officer has reasonable cause to
believe that more than one family or household member has committed such
a misdemeanor, the officer is not required to arrest each such person.
In such circumstances, the officer shall attempt to identify and arrest
the primary physical aggressor after considering: (i) the comparative
extent of any injuries inflicted by and between the parties; (ii)
whether any such person is threatening or has threatened future harm
against another party or another family or household member; (iii)
whether any such person has a prior history of domestic violence that
the officer can reasonably ascertain; and (iv) whether any such person
acted defensively to protect himself or herself from injury. The officer
shall evaluate each complaint separately to determine who is the primary
physical aggressor and shall not base the decision to arrest or not to
arrest on the willingness of a person to testify or otherwise
participate in a judicial proceeding.
The protected party in whose favor the order of protection or
temporary order of protection is issued may not be held to violate an
order issued in his or her favor nor may such protected party be
arrested for violating such order.
Nothing contained in this subdivision shall be deemed to (a) require
the arrest of any person when the officer reasonably believes the
person's conduct is justifiable under article thirty-five of title C of
the penal law; or (b) restrict or impair the authority of any
municipality, political subdivision, or the division of state police
from promulgating rules, regulations and policies requiring the arrest
of persons in additional circumstances where domestic violence has
allegedly occurred.
No cause of action for damages shall arise in favor of any person by
reason of any arrest made by a police officer pursuant to this
subdivision, except as provided in sections seventeen and eighteen of
the public officers law and sections fifty-k, fifty-l, fifty-m and
fifty-n of the general municipal law, as appropriate.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
5. Upon investigating a report of a crime or offense between members
of the same family or household as such terms are defined in section
530.11 of this chapter and section eight hundred twelve of the family
court act, a law enforcement officer shall prepare, file, and translate,
in accordance with section two hundred fourteen-b or eight hundred forty
of the executive law, a written report of the incident, on a form
promulgated pursuant to section eight hundred thirty-seven of the
executive law, including statements made by the victim and by any
witnesses, and make any additional reports required by local law
enforcement policy or regulations. Such report shall be prepared and
filed, whether or not an arrest is made as a result of the officers'
investigation, and shall be retained by the law enforcement agency for a
period of not less than four years. Where the reported incident involved
an offense committed against a person who is sixty-five years of age or
older a copy of the report required by this subdivision shall be sent to
the New York state committee for the coordination of police services to
elderly persons established pursuant to section eight hundred
forty-four-b of the executive law. Where the reported incident involved
an offense committed by an individual known by the law enforcement
officer to be under probation or parole supervision, he or she shall
transmit a copy of the report as soon as practicable to the supervising
probation department or the department of corrections and community
supervision.
6. (a) (i) A police officer who responds to a report of a family
offense as defined in section 530.11 of this chapter and section eight
hundred twelve of the family court act:
(1) may take temporary custody of any firearm, rifle, electronic dart
gun, electronic stun gun, disguised gun, imitation weapon, shotgun,
antique firearm, black powder rifle, black powder shotgun, or
muzzle-loading firearm that is in plain sight or is discovered pursuant
to a consensual or other lawful search;
(2) shall take temporary custody of any firearm, rifle, electronic
dart gun, electronic stun gun, disguised gun, imitation weapon, shotgun,
antique firearm, black powder rifle, black powder shotgun, or
muzzle-loading firearm that is in the possession of any person arrested
for the commission of a family offense or suspected of its commission;
and
(3) shall take temporary custody of any firearm, rifle, electronic
dart gun, electronic stun gun, disguised gun, imitation weapon, shotgun,
antique firearm, black powder rifle, black powder shotgun, or
muzzle-loading firearm that is in plain sight or is discovered pursuant
to a consensual or other lawful search if any one of the following
circumstances is present:
A. the victim responds in the affirmative to the suspect threats
questions in the victim interview section in the prior history section
of the New York state standardized domestic incident report (DIR) form;
or
B. the victim responds in the affirmative to any of the lethality
assessment questions in the prior history section of the New York state
standardized domestic incident report (DIR) form; or
C. any responding officer has a reasonable belief that it is necessary
to remove such weapon to protect the victim or other persons present, or
to prevent risk of further violence or threat.
(ii) An officer who takes custody of any weapon pursuant to this
paragraph shall also take custody of any license to carry, possess,
repair, and dispose of such weapon issued to the person arrested or
suspected of such family offense. The officer shall deliver such weapon
and/or license to the appropriate law enforcement officer as provided in
subparagraph (f) of paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20 of
the penal law.
(b) Upon taking custody of weapons or a license described in paragraph
(a) of this subdivision, the responding officer shall give the owner or
person in possession of such weapons or license a receipt describing
such weapons and/or license and indicating any identification or serial
number on such weapons. Such receipt shall indicate where the weapons
and/or license can be recovered and describe the process for recovery
provided in paragraph (e) of this subdivision.
(c) Not less than one hundred twenty hours after effecting such
seizure, and in the absence of (i) an order of protection, an extreme
risk protection order, or other court order prohibiting the owner from
possessing such a weapon and/or license, or (ii) a pending criminal
charge or conviction which prohibits such owner from possessing such a
weapon and/or license, and upon a written finding that there is no legal
impediment to the owner's possession of such a weapon and/or license,
the court or, if no court is involved, licensing authority or custodian
of the weapon shall direct return of a weapon not otherwise disposed of
in accordance with subdivision one of section 400.05 of the penal law
and/or such license taken into custody pursuant to this section.
(d) If any other person demonstrates that such person is the lawful
owner of any weapon taken into custody pursuant to this section, and
provided that the court or, if no court is involved, licensing authority
or custodian of the weapon has made a written finding that there is no
legal impediment to the person's possession of such a weapon, such
court, licensing authority or custodian of the weapon, as the case may
be, shall direct that such weapon be returned to such lawful owner.
(e) All weapons in the possession of a law enforcement official
pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of
applicable law, including but not limited to subdivision six of section
400.05 of the penal law; provided, however, that any such weapon shall
be retained and not disposed of by the law enforcement agency for at
least two years unless legally transferred by the owner to an individual
permitted by law to own and possess such weapon.
Arrest without a warrant; when and how made by police officer.
1. A police officer may arrest a person for an offense, pursuant to
section 140.10, at any hour of any day or night.
2. The arresting police officer must inform such person of his
authority and purpose and of the reason for such arrest unless he
encounters physical resistance, flight or other factors rendering such
procedure impractical.
3. In order to effect such an arrest, such police officer may use
such physical force as is justifiable pursuant to section 35.30 of the
penal law.
4. In order to effect such an arrest, a police officer may enter
premises in which he reasonably believes such person to be present,
under the same circumstances and in the same manner as would be
authorized, by the provisions of subdivisions four and five of section
120.80, if he were attempting to make such arrest pursuant to a warrant
of arrest.
Child-sensitive arrests.
A state or local law enforcement officer who arrests an individual
legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen
years old shall, to the extent practicable, at the time of the arrest
take appropriate action that is conducive to the child's safety and/or
security and is consistent with the policies and procedures established
pursuant to section two hundred fourteen-i or paragraph (f-2) of
subdivision three of section eight hundred forty of the executive law as
applicable.
Arrest without a warrant; procedure after arrest by police
officer.
1. Upon arresting a person without a warrant, a police officer, after
performing without unnecessary delay all recording, fingerprinting and
other preliminary police duties required in the particular case, must
except as otherwise provided in this section, without unnecessary delay
bring the arrested person or cause him to be brought before a local
criminal court and file therewith an appropriate accusatory instrument
charging him with the offense or offenses in question. The arrested
person must be brought to the particular local criminal court, or to one
of them if there be more than one, designated in section 100.55 as an
appropriate court for commencement of the particular action; except
that:
(a) If the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law committed in a town,
but not in a village thereof having a village court, and the town court
of such town is not available at the time, the arrested person may be
brought before the local criminal court of any village within such town
or, any adjoining town, village embraced in whole or in part by such
adjoining town, or city of the same county; and
(b) If the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law committed in a village
having a village court and such court is not available at the time, the
arrested person may be brought before the town court of the town
embracing such village or any other village court within such town, or,
if such town or village court is not available either, before the local
criminal court of any adjoining town, village embraced in whole or in
part by such adjoining town, or city of the same county; and
(c) If the arrest is for an offense committed in a city, and the city
court thereof is not available at the time, the arrested person may be
brought before the local criminal court of any adjoining town or
village, or village court embraced by an adjoining town, within the same
county as such city; and
(d) If the arrest is for a traffic infraction or for a misdemeanor
relating to traffic, the police officer may, instead of bringing the
arrested person before the local criminal court of the political
subdivision or locality in which the offense was allegedly committed,
bring him or her before the local criminal court of the same county
nearest available by highway travel to the point of arrest; and
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, where a local
criminal court in the county in which the defendant is arrested is
operating an off-hours arraignment part designated in accordance with
paragraph (w) of subdivision one of section two hundred twelve of the
judiciary law at the time of defendant's arrest, the arrested person may
be brought before such local criminal court.
2. If the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law, or other than where
an arrest is required to be made pursuant to subdivision four of section
140.10 of this article, the arrested person need not be brought before a
local criminal court as provided in subdivision one, and the procedure
may instead be as follows:
(a) A police officer may issue and serve an appearance ticket upon the
arrested person and release him from custody, as prescribed in
subdivision two of section 150.20 of this title; or
(b) The desk officer in charge at a police station, county jail or
police headquarters, or any of his superior officers, may, in such place
fix pre-arraignment bail and, upon deposit thereof, issue and serve an
appearance ticket upon the arrested person and release him from custody.
3. Other than where an arrest is required to be made pursuant to
subdivision four of section 140.10 of this article, if (a) the arrest is
for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D felony or a violation of
section 130.25, former section 130.40, section 205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or
215.56 of the penal law, and (b) owing to unavailability of a local
criminal court the arresting police officer is unable to bring the
arrested person before such a court with reasonable promptness, either
an appearance ticket must be served unconditionally upon the arrested
person or pre-arraignment bail must be fixed, as prescribed in
subdivision two. If pre-arraignment bail is fixed but not posted, such
arrested person may be temporarily held in custody but must be brought
before a local criminal court without unnecessary delay. Nothing
contained in this subdivision requires a police officer to serve an
appearance ticket upon an arrested person or release him from custody at
a time when such person appears to be under the influence of alcohol,
narcotics or other drug to the degree that he may endanger himself or
other persons.
4. If after arresting a person, for any offense, a police officer upon
further investigation or inquiry determines or is satisfied that there
is not reasonable cause to believe that the arrested person committed
such offense or any other offense based upon the conduct in question, he
need not follow any of the procedures prescribed in subdivisions one,
two and three, but must immediately release such person from custody.
5. Before service of an appearance ticket upon an arrested person
pursuant to subdivision two or three, the issuing police officer must,
if the offense designated in such appearance ticket is one of those
specified in subdivision one of section 160.10, cause such person to be
fingerprinted in the same manner as would be required were no appearance
ticket to be issued or served.
6. Upon arresting a juvenile offender or a person sixteen or
commencing October first, two thousand nineteen, seventeen years of age
without a warrant, the police officer shall immediately notify the
parent or other person legally responsible for his or her care or the
person with whom he or she is domiciled, that such offender or person
has been arrested, and the location of the facility where he or she is
being detained. If the officer determines that it is necessary to
question a juvenile offender or such person, the officer must take him
or her to a facility designated by the chief administrator of the courts
as a suitable place for the questioning of children or, upon the consent
of a parent or other person legally responsible for the care of the
juvenile or such person, to his or her residence and there question him
or her for a reasonable period of time. A juvenile or such person shall
not be questioned pursuant to this section unless he or she and a person
required to be notified pursuant to this subdivision, if present, have
been advised:
(a) of the juvenile offender's or such person's right to remain
silent;
(b) that the statements made by him or her may be used in a court of
law;
(c) of his or her right to have an attorney present at such
questioning; and
(d) of his or her right to have an attorney provided for him or her
without charge if he or she is unable to afford counsel.
In determining the suitability of questioning and determining the
reasonable period of time for questioning such a juvenile offender or
person, his or her age, the presence or absence of his or her parents or
other persons legally responsible for his or her care and notification
pursuant to this subdivision shall be included among relevant
considerations.
7. Upon arresting a person, other than a juvenile offender, for any
offense without a warrant, a police officer shall, upon the arrested
person's request, permit him or her to communicate by telephone provided
by the law enforcement facility where the defendant is held to a phone
number located in the United States or Puerto Rico, for the purposes of
obtaining counsel and informing a relative or friend that he or she has
been arrested, unless granting the call will compromise an ongoing
investigation or the prosecution of the defendant.
8. If the arrest is for a juvenile offender or adolescent offender
other than an arrest for a violation or a traffic infraction, such
offender shall be brought before the youth part of the superior court.
If the youth part is not in session, such offender shall be brought
before the most accessible magistrate designated by the appellate
division of the supreme court in the applicable department to act as a
youth part.
Arrest without a warrant; by peace officer.
1. A peace officer, acting pursuant to his special duties, may arrest
a person for:
(a) Any offense when he has reasonable cause to believe that such
person has committed such offense in his presence; and
(b) A crime when he has reasonable cause to believe that such person
has committed such crime, whether in his presence or otherwise.
2. A peace officer acts "pursuant to his special duties" in making an
arrest only when the arrest is for:
(a) An offense defined by a statute which such peace officer, by
reason of the specialized nature of his particular employment or by
express provision of law, is required or authorized to enforce; or
(b) An offense committed or reasonably believed by him to have been
committed in such manner or place as to render arrest of the offender by
such peace officer under the particular circumstances an integral part
of his specialized duties.
3. A peace officer, whether or not he is acting pursuant to his
special duties, may arrest a person for an offense committed or believed
by him to have been committed within the geographical area of such peace
officer's employment, as follows:
(a) He may arrest such person for any offense when such person has in
fact committed such offense in his presence; and
(b) He may arrest such person for a felony when he has reasonable
cause to believe that such person has committed such felony, whether in
his presence or otherwise.
4. A peace officer, when outside the geographical area of his
employment, may, anywhere in the state, arrest a person for a felony
when he has reasonable cause to believe that such person has there
committed such felony in his presence, provided that such arrest is made
during or immediately after the allegedly criminal conduct or during the
alleged perpetrator's immediate flight therefrom.
5. For the purposes of this section, the "geographical area of
employment" of a peace officer is as follows:
(a) The "geographical area of employment" of any peace officer
employed as such by any agency of the state consists of the entire
state;
(b) The "geographical area of employment" of any peace officer
employed as such by an agency of a county, city, town or village
consists of (i) such county, city, town or village, as the case may be,
and (ii) any other place where he is, at a particular time, acting in
the course of his particular duties or employment;
(c) The "geographical area of employment" of any peace officer
employed as such by any private organization consists of any place in
the state where he is, at a particular time, acting in the course of his
particular duties or employment.
Arrest without a warrant; when and how made; procedure after
arrest by peace officer.
1. The rules governing the manner in which a peace officer may make an
arrest, pursuant to section 140.25, are the same as those governing
arrests by police officers, as prescribed in section 140.15.
2. Upon arresting a person without a warrant, a peace officer, except
as otherwise provided in subdivision three or three-a, must without
unnecessary delay bring him or cause him to be brought before a local
criminal court, as provided in section 100.55 and subdivision one of
section 140.20, and must without unnecessary delay file or cause to be
filed therewith an appropriate accusatory instrument. If the offense
which is the subject of the arrest is one of those specified in
subdivision one of section 160.10, the arrested person must be
fingerprinted and photographed as therein provided. In order to execute
the required post-arrest functions, such arresting peace officer may
perform such functions himself or he may enlist the aid of a police
officer for the performance thereof in the manner provided in
subdivision one of section 140.20.
3. If (a) the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law and (b) owing to
unavailability of a local criminal court such peace officer is unable to
bring or cause the arrested person to be brought before such a court
with reasonable promptness, the arrested person must be brought to an
appropriate police station, county jail or police headquarters where he
must be dealt with in the manner prescribed in subdivision three of
section 140.20, as if he had been arrested by a police officer.
3-a. If the arrest is for a juvenile offender or adolescent offender
other than an arrest for violations or traffic infractions, such
offender shall be brought before the youth part of the superior court.
If the youth part is not in session, such offender shall be brought
before the most accessible magistrate designated by the appellate
division of the supreme court in the applicable department to act as a
youth part.
4. If the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law, the arrested person
need not be brought before a local criminal court as provided in
subdivision two, and the procedure may instead be as follows:
(a) The arresting peace officer, where he is specially authorized by
law to issue and serve an appearance ticket, may issue and serve an
appearance ticket upon the arrested person and release him from custody;
or
(b) The arresting peace officer, where he is not specially authorized
by law to issue and serve an appearance ticket, may enlist the aid of a
police officer and request that such officer issue and serve an
appearance ticket upon the arrested person, and upon such issuance and
service the latter must be released from custody.
5. Upon arresting a juvenile offender or a person sixteen or
commencing October first, two thousand nineteen, seventeen years of age
without a warrant, the peace officer shall immediately notify the parent
or other person legally responsible for his or her care or the person
with whom he or she is domiciled, that such offender or person has been
arrested, and the location of the facility where he or she is being
detained. If the officer determines that it is necessary to question a
juvenile offender or such person, the officer must take him or her to a
facility designated by the chief administrator of the courts as a
suitable place for the questioning of children or, upon the consent of a
parent or other person legally responsible for the care of a juvenile
offender or such person, to his or her residence and there question him
or her for a reasonable period of time. A juvenile offender or such
person shall not be questioned pursuant to this section unless the
juvenile offender or such person and a person required to be notified
pursuant to this subdivision, if present, have been advised:
(a) of his or her right to remain silent;
(b) that the statements made by the juvenile offender or such person
may be used in a court of law;
(c) of his or her right to have an attorney present at such
questioning; and
(d) of his or her right to have an attorney provided for him or her
without charge if he or she is unable to afford counsel.
In determining the suitability of questioning and determining the
reasonable period of time for questioning such a juvenile offender or
such person, his or her age, the presence or absence of his or her
parents or other persons legally responsible for his or her care and
notification pursuant to this subdivision shall be included among
relevant considerations.
Arrest without a warrant; by any person; when and where
authorized.
1. Subject to the provisions of subdivision two, any person may
arrest another person (a) for a felony when the latter has in fact
committed such felony, and (b) for any offense when the latter has in
fact committed such offense in his presence.
2. Such an arrest, if for a felony, may be made anywhere in the
state. If the arrest is for an offense other than a felony, it may be
made only in the county in which such offense was committed.
Arrest without a warrant; by person acting other than as a
police officer or a peace officer; when and how made.
1. A person may arrest another person for an offense pursuant to
section 140.30 at any hour of any day or night.
2. Such person must inform the person whom he is arresting of the
reason for such arrest unless he encounters physical resistance, flight
or other factors rendering such procedure impractical.
3. In order to effect such an arrest, such person may use such
physical force as is justifiable pursuant to subdivision four of section
35.30 of the penal law.
Arrest without a warrant; by person acting other than as a
police officer or a peace officer; procedure after arrest.
1. A person making an arrest pursuant to section 140.30 must without
unnecessary delay deliver or attempt to deliver the person arrested to
the custody of an appropriate police officer, as defined in subdivision
five. For such purpose, he may solicit the aid of any police officer and
the latter, if he is not himself an appropriate police officer, must
assist in delivering the arrested person to an appropriate officer. If
the arrest is for a felony, the appropriate police officer must, upon
receiving custody of the arrested person, perform all recording,
fingerprinting and other preliminary police duties required in the
particular case. In any case, the appropriate police officer, upon
receiving custody of the arrested person, except as otherwise provided
in subdivisions two and three, must bring him, on behalf of the
arresting person, before an appropriate local criminal court, as defined
in subdivision five, and the arresting person must without unnecessary
delay file an appropriate accusatory instrument with such court.
2. If (a) the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law and (b) owing to
unavailability of a local criminal court the appropriate police officer
having custody of the arrested person is unable to bring him before such
a court with reasonable promptness, the arrested person must be dealt
with in the manner prescribed in subdivision three of section 140.20, as
if he had been arrested by a police officer.
3. If the arrest is for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D
felony or a violation of section 130.25, former section 130.40, section
205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law, the arrested person
need not be brought before a local criminal court, as provided in
subdivision one, and the procedure may instead be as follows:
(a) An appropriate police officer may issue and serve an appearance
ticket upon the arrested person and release him from custody, as
prescribed in subdivision two of section 150.20; or
(b) The desk officer in charge at the appropriate police officer's
station, county jail or police headquarters, or any of his superior
officers, may, in such place, fix pre-arraignment bail and, upon deposit
thereof, issue and serve an appearance ticket upon the arrested person
and release him from custody, as prescribed in section 150.30.
4. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a police
officer is not required to take an arrested person into custody or to
take any other action prescribed in this section on behalf of the
arresting person if he has reasonable cause to believe that the arrested
person did not commit the alleged offense or that the arrest was
otherwise unauthorized.
5. If a police officer takes an arrested juvenile offender or a person
sixteen or commencing October first, two thosuand nineteen, seventeen
years of age into custody, the police officer shall immediately notify
the parent or other person legally responsible for his or her care or
the person with whom he or she is domiciled, that such offender or
person has been arrested, and the location of the facility where he or
she is being detained. If the officer determines that it is necessary to
question a juvenile offender or such person the officer must take him or
her to a facility designated by the chief administrator of the courts as
a suitable place for the questioning of children or, upon the consent of
a parent or other person legally responsible for the care of the
juvenile offender or such person, to his or her residence and there
question him or her for a reasonable period of time. A juvenile offender
or such person shall not be questioned pursuant to this section unless
he or she and a person required to be notified pursuant to this
subdivision, if present, have been advised:
(a) of his or her right to remain silent;
(b) that the statements made by the juvenile offender or such person
may be used in a court of law;
(c) of his or her right to have an attorney present at such
questioning; and
(d) of his or her right to have an attorney provided for him or her
without charge if he or she is unable to afford counsel.
In determining the suitability of questioning and determining the
reasonable period of time for questioning such a juvenile offender or
such person, his or her age, the presence or absence of his or her
parents or other persons legally responsible for his or her care and
notification pursuant to this subdivision shall be included among
relevant considerations.
6. As used in this section:
(a) An "appropriate police officer" means one who would himself be
authorized to make the arrest in question as a police officer pursuant
to section 140.10;
(b) An "appropriate local criminal court" means one with which an
accusatory instrument charging the offense in question may properly be
filed pursuant to the provisions of section 100.55.
Arrest without a warrant; dismissal of insufficient local
criminal court accusatory instrument.
If a local criminal court accusatory instrument filed with a local
criminal court pursuant to section 140.20, 140.25 or 140.40 is not
sufficient on its face, as prescribed in section 100.40, and if the
court is satisfied that on the basis of the available facts or evidence
it would be impossible to draw and file an accusatory instrument which
is sufficient on its face, it must dismiss such accusatory instrument
and discharge the defendant.
Temporary questioning of persons in public places; search for
weapons.
1. In addition to the authority provided by this article for making an
arrest without a warrant, a police officer may stop a person in a public
place located within the geographical area of such officer's employment
when he reasonably suspects that such person is committing, has
committed or is about to commit either (a) a felony or (b) a misdemeanor
defined in the penal law, and may demand of him his name, address and an
explanation of his conduct.
2. Any person who is a peace officer and who provides security
services for any court of the unified court system may stop a person in
or about the courthouse to which he is assigned when he reasonably
suspects that such person is committing, has committed or is about to
commit either (a) a felony or (b) a misdemeanor defined in the penal
law, and may demand of him his name, address and an explanation of his
conduct.
3. When upon stopping a person under circumstances prescribed in
subdivisions one and two a police officer or court officer, as the case
may be, reasonably suspects that he is in danger of physical injury, he
may search such person for a deadly weapon or any instrument, article or
substance readily capable of causing serious physical injury and of a
sort not ordinarily carried in public places by law-abiding persons. If
he finds such a weapon or instrument, or any other property possession
of which he reasonably believes may constitute the commission of a
crime, he may take it and keep it until the completion of the
questioning, at which time he shall either return it, if lawfully
possessed, or arrest such person.
4. In cities with a population of one million or more, information
that establishes the personal identity of an individual who has been
stopped, questioned and/or frisked by a police officer or peace officer,
such as the name, address or social security number of such person,
shall not be recorded in a computerized or electronic database if that
individual is released without further legal action; provided, however,
that this subdivision shall not prohibit police officers or peace
officers from including in a computerized or electronic database generic
characteristics of an individual, such as race and gender, who has been
stopped, questioned and/or frisked by a police officer or peace officer.
Arrest without a warrant; by peace officers of other states for
offense committed outside state; uniform close pursuit act.
1. As used in this section, the word "state" shall include the
District of Columbia.
2. Any peace officer of another state of the United States, who
enters this state in close pursuit and continues within this state in
such close pursuit of a person in order to arrest him, shall have the
same authority to arrest and hold in custody such person on the ground
that he has committed a crime in another state which is a crime under
the laws of the state of New York, as police officers of this state have
to arrest and hold in custody a person on the ground that he has
committed a crime in this state.
3. If an arrest is made in this state by an officer of another state
in accordance with the provisions of subdivision two, he shall without
unnecessary delay take the person arrested before a local criminal court
which shall conduct a hearing for the sole purpose of determining if the
arrest was in accordance with the provisions of subdivision two, and not
of determining the guilt or innocence of the arrested person. If such
court determines that the arrest was in accordance with such
subdivision, it shall commit the person arrested to the custody of the
officer making the arrest, who shall without unnecessary delay take him
to the state from which he fled. If such court determines that the
arrest was unlawful, it shall discharge the person arrested.
4. This section shall not be construed so as to make unlawful any
arrest in this state which would otherwise be lawful.
5. Upon the taking effect of this section it shall be the duty of the
secretary of state to certify a copy of this section to the executive
department of each of the states of the United States.
6. This section shall apply only to peace officers of a state which
by its laws has made similar provision for the arrest and custody of
persons closely pursued within the territory thereof.
7. If any part of this section is for any reason declared void, it is
declared to be the intent of this section that such invalidity shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this section.
8. This section may be cited as the uniform act on close pursuit.
ARTICLE 150 The Appearance Ticket
Appearance ticket; definition, form and content.
1. An appearance ticket is a written notice issued and subscribed by a
police officer or other public servant authorized by state law or local
law enacted pursuant to the provisions of the municipal home rule law to
issue the same, directing a designated person to appear in a designated
local criminal court at a designated future time in connection with his
alleged commission of a designated offense. A notice conforming to such
definition constitutes an appearance ticket regardless of whether it is
referred to in some other provision of law as a summons or by any other
name or title.
2. When an appearance ticket as defined in subdivision one of this
section is issued to a person in conjunction with an offense charged in
a simplified information, said appearance ticket shall contain the
language, set forth in subdivision four of section 100.25, notifying the
defendant of his right to receive a supporting deposition.
3. Before issuing an appearance ticket a police officer or other
public servant must inform the arrestee that they may provide their
contact information for the purposes of receiving a court notification
to remind them of their court appearance date from the court or a
certified pretrial services agency. Such contact information may include
one or more phone numbers, a residential address or address at which the
arrestee receives mail, or an email address. The contact information
shall be recorded and be transmitted to the local criminal court as
required by section 150.80 of this article.
Appearance ticket; when and by whom issuable.
1. (a) Whenever a police officer is authorized pursuant to section
140.10 of this title to arrest a person without a warrant for an offense
other than a class A, B, C or D felony or a violation of section 130.25,
former section 130.40, section 205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the
penal law, or other than where an arrest is required to be made pursuant
to subdivision four of section 140.10 of this title, the officer shall,
except as set out in paragraph (b) of this subdivision, subject to the
provisions of subdivisions three and four of section 150.40 of this
title, instead issue to and serve upon such person an appearance ticket.
(b) An officer is not required to issue an appearance ticket if:
(i) the person has one or more outstanding local criminal court or
superior court warrants;
(ii) the person has failed to appear in court proceedings in the last
two years;
(iii) the person has been given a reasonable opportunity to make their
verifiable identity and a method of contact known, and has been unable
or unwilling to do so, so that a custodial arrest is necessary to
subject the individual to the jurisdiction of the court. For the
purposes of this section, an officer may rely on various factors to
determine a person's identity, including but not limited to personal
knowledge of such person, such person's self-identification, or
photographic identification. There is no requirement that a person
present photographic identification in order to be issued an appearance
ticket in lieu of arrest where the person's identity is otherwise
verifiable; however, if offered by such person, an officer shall accept
as evidence of identity the following: a valid driver's license or
non-driver identification card issued by the commissioner of motor
vehicles, the federal government, any United States territory,
commonwealth or possession, the District of Columbia, a state government
or municipal government within the United States or a provincial
government of the dominion of Canada; a valid passport issued by the
United States government or any other country; an identification card
issued by the armed forces of the United States; a public benefit card,
as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 158.00 of the
penal law;
(iv) the person is charged with a crime between members of the same
family or household, as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of
this chapter;
(v) the person is charged with a crime defined in article 130 of the
penal law;
(vi) it reasonably appears the person should be brought before the
court for consideration of issuance of an order of protection, pursuant
to section 530.13 of this chapter, based on the facts of the crime or
offense that the officer has reasonable cause to believe occurred;
(vii) the person is charged with a crime for which the court may
suspend or revoke his or her driver license;
(viii) it reasonably appears to the officer, based on the observed
behavior of the individual in the present contact with the officer and
facts regarding the person's condition that indicates a sign of distress
to such a degree that the person would face harm without immediate
medical or mental health care, that bringing the person before the court
would be in such person's interest in addressing that need; provided,
however, that before making the arrest, the officer shall make all
reasonable efforts to assist the person in securing appropriate
services;
(ix) the person is eighteen years of age or older and charged with
criminal possession of a weapon on school grounds as defined in section
265.01-a of the penal law;
(x) the person is eighteen years of age or older and charged with a
hate crime as defined in section 485.05 of the penal law; or
(xi) the offense is a qualifying offense pursuant to paragraph (t) of
subdivision four of section 510.10 of this chapter, or pursuant to
paragraph (t) of subdivision four of section 530.40 of this chapter.
2. (a) Whenever, pursuant to section 140.10 of this title, a police
officer has arrested a person without a warrant for an offense other
than a class A, B, C or D felony or a violation of section 130.25,
130.40, 205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal law or other than
where an arrest was required to be made pursuant to subdivision four of
section 140.10 of this title, or (b) whenever a peace officer, who is
not authorized by law to issue an appearance ticket, has arrested a
person for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D felony or a
violation of section 130.25, 130.40, 205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of
the penal law pursuant to section 140.25 of this title, and such peace
officer has requested a police officer to issue and serve upon such
arrested person an appearance ticket pursuant to subdivision four of
section 140.27 of this title, or (c) whenever a person has been arrested
for an offense other than a class A, B, C or D felony or a violation of
section 130.25, 130.40, 205.10, 205.17, 205.19 or 215.56 of the penal
law and such person has been delivered to the custody of an appropriate
police officer pursuant to section 140.40 of this title, such police
officer may, instead of bringing such person before a local criminal
court and promptly filing or causing the arresting peace officer or
arresting person to file a local criminal court accusatory instrument
therewith, issue to and serve upon such person an appearance ticket.
3. A public servant other than a police officer, who is specially
authorized by state law or local law enacted pursuant to the provisions
of the municipal home rule law to issue and serve appearance tickets
with respect to designated offenses other than class A, B, C or D
felonies or violations of section 130.25, 130.40, 205.10, 205.17, 205.19
or 215.56 of the penal law, may in such cases issue and serve upon a
person an appearance ticket when he has reasonable cause to believe that
such person has committed a crime, or has committed a petty offense in
his presence.
Appearance ticket; where returnable; how and where served.
1. An appearance ticket must be made returnable at a date as soon as
possible, but in no event later than twenty days from the date of
issuance; or at the next scheduled session of the appropriate local
criminal court if such session is scheduled to occur more than twenty
days from the date of issuance; or at a later date, with the court's
permission due to enrollment in a pre-arraignment diversion program. The
appearance ticket shall be made returnable in a local criminal court
designated in section 100.55 of this title as one with which an
information for the offense in question may be filed.
2. An appearance ticket, other than one issued for a traffic
infraction relating to parking, must be served personally, except that
an appearance ticket issued for the violation of a local zoning
ordinance or local zoning law, or of a building or sanitation code may
be served in any manner authorized for service under section three
hundred eight of the civil practice law and rules.
3. An appearance ticket may be served anywhere in the county in which
the designated offense was allegedly committed or in any adjoining
county, and may be served elsewhere as prescribed in subdivision four.
4. A police officer may, for the purpose of serving an appearance
ticket upon a person, follow him in continuous close pursuit, commencing
either in the county in which the alleged offense was committed or in an
adjoining county, in and through any county of the state, and may serve
such appearance ticket upon him in any county in which he overtakes him.
Appearance ticket; filing a local criminal court accusatory
instrument; dismissal of insufficient instrument.
1. A police officer or other public servant who has issued and served
an appearance ticket must, at or before the time such appearance ticket
is returnable, file or cause to be filed with the local criminal court
in which it is returnable a local criminal court accusatory instrument
charging the person named in such appearance ticket with the offense
specified therein; provided, however, that no separate accusatory
instrument shall be required to be filed for an appearance ticket issued
for a parking infraction which conforms to the requirements set forth in
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 1.20 of this chapter.
Nothing herein contained shall authorize the use of a simplified
information when not authorized by law.
2. If such accusatory instrument is not sufficient on its face, as
prescribed in section 100.40, and if the court is satisfied that on the
basis of the available facts or evidence it would be impossible to draw
and file an accusatory instrument which is sufficient on its face, it
must dismiss such accusatory instrument.
Appearance ticket; defendant's failure to appear.
If after the service of an appearance ticket and the filing of a local
criminal court accusatory instrument charging the offense designated
therein, the defendant does not appear in the designated local criminal
court at the time such appearance ticket is returnable, the court may
issue a summons or a warrant of arrest based upon the local criminal
court accusatory instrument filed.
Appearance ticket; fingerprinting of defendant.
Upon the arraignment of a defendant who has not been arrested and
whose court attendance has been secured by the issuance and service of
an appearance ticket pursuant to subdivision one of section 150.20, the
court must, if an offense charged in the accusatory instrument is one
specified in subdivision one of section 160.10, direct that the
defendant be fingerprinted by the appropriate police officer or agency,
and that he appear at an appropriate designated time and place for such
purpose.
Appearance ticket; certain cases.
1. The provisions of this section shall apply in any case wherein the
defendant is alleged to have committed an offense defined in section
221.05 of the penal law, and no other offense is alleged,
notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or any other law to the
contrary.
2. Whenever the defendant is arrested without a warrant, an
appearance ticket shall promptly be issued and served upon him, as
provided in this article. The issuance and service of the appearance
ticket may be made conditional upon the posting of pre-arraignment bail
as provided in section 150.30 of this chapter but only if the
appropriate police officer (a) is unable to ascertain the defendant's
identity or residence address; or (b) reasonably suspects that the
identification or residence address given by the defendant is not
accurate; or (c) reasonably suspects that the defendant does not reside
within the state. No warrant of arrest shall be issued unless the
defendant has failed to appear in court as required by the terms of the
appearance ticket or by the court.
Court appearance reminders.
1. A police officer or other public servant who has issued and served
an appearance ticket must, within twenty-four hours of issuance, file or
cause to be filed with the local criminal court the appearance ticket
and any contact information made available pursuant to subdivision three
of section 150.10 of this article.
2. Upon receipt of the appearance ticket and any contact information
made available pursuant to subdivision three of section 150.10 of this
article, the local criminal court shall issue a court appearance
reminder and notify the arrestee of their court appearances by text
message, telephone call, electronic mail, or first class mail. The local
criminal court may partner with a certified pretrial services agency or
agencies in that county to provide such notification and shall include a
copy of the appearance ticket.
3. A local criminal court is not required to issue a court appearance
reminder if the appearance ticket requires the arrestee's appearance
within seventy-two hours of its issuance, or no contact information has
been provided.
ARTICLE 160 Fingerprinting and Photographing of Defendant After Arrest--criminal Identification Records and Statistics
Fingerprinting; duties of police with respect thereto.
1. Following an arrest, or following the arraignment upon a local
criminal court accusatory instrument of a defendant whose court
attendance has been secured by a summons or an appearance ticket under
circumstances described in sections 130.60 and 150.70, the arresting or
other appropriate police officer or agency must take or cause to be
taken fingerprints of the arrested person or defendant if an offense
which is the subject of the arrest or which is charged in the accusatory
instrument filed is:
(a) A felony; or
(b) A misdemeanor defined in the penal law; or
(c) A misdemeanor defined outside the penal law which would constitute
a felony if such person had a previous judgment of conviction for a
crime.
2. In addition, a police officer who makes an arrest for any offense,
either with or without a warrant, may take or cause to be taken the
fingerprints of the arrested person if such police officer:
(a) Is unable to ascertain such person's identity; or
(b) Reasonably suspects that the identification given by such person
is not accurate; or
(c) Reasonably suspects that such person is being sought by law
enforcement officials for the commission of some other offense.
3. Whenever fingerprints are required to be taken pursuant to
subdivision one or permitted to be taken pursuant to subdivision two,
the photograph and palmprints of the arrested person or the defendant,
as the case may be, may also be taken.
4. The taking of fingerprints as prescribed in this section and the
submission of available information concerning the arrested person or
the defendant and the facts and circumstances of the crime charged must
be in accordance with the standards established by the commissioner of
the division of criminal justice services.
Fingerprinting; forwarding of fingerprints.
Upon the taking of fingerprints of an arrested person or defendant as
prescribed in section 160.10, the appropriate police officer or agency
must without unnecessary delay forward two copies of such fingerprints
to the division of criminal justice services.
Fingerprinting; duties of division of criminal justice
services.
1. Upon receiving fingerprints from a police officer or agency
pursuant to section 160.20 of this chapter, the division of criminal
justice services must, except as provided in subdivision two of this
section, classify them and search its records for information concerning
a previous record of the defendant, including any adjudication as a
juvenile delinquent pursuant to article three of the family court act,
or as a youthful offender pursuant to article seven hundred twenty of
this chapter, and promptly transmit to such forwarding police officer or
agency a report containing all information on file with respect to such
defendant's previous record, if any, or stating that the defendant has
no previous record according to its files. Such a report, if certified,
constitutes presumptive evidence of the facts so certified.
2. If the fingerprints so received are not sufficiently legible to
permit accurate and complete classification, they must be returned to
the forwarding police officer or agency with an explanation of the
defects and a request that the defendant's fingerprints be retaken if
possible.
Fingerprinting; transmission of report received by police.
1. Upon receipt of a report of the division of criminal justice
services as provided in section 160.30, the recipient police officer or
agency must promptly transmit such report or a copy thereof to the
district attorney of the county and two copies thereof to the court in
which the action is pending.
2. Upon receipt of such report the court shall furnish a copy thereof
to counsel for the defendant or, if the defendant is not represented by
counsel, to the defendant.
Polygraph tests; prohibition against.
1. No district attorney, police officer or employee of any law
enforcement agency shall request or require any victim of a sexual
assault crime to submit to any polygraph test or psychological stress
evaluator examination.
2. As used in this section, "victim of a sexual assault crime" means
any person alleged to have sustained an offense under article one
hundred thirty or section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of the penal law.
Order upon termination of criminal action in favor of the
accused.
1. Upon the termination of a criminal action or proceeding against a
person in favor of such person, as defined in subdivision three of this
section, unless the district attorney upon motion with not less than
five days notice to such person or his or her attorney demonstrates to
the satisfaction of the court that the interests of justice require
otherwise, or the court on its own motion with not less than five days
notice to such person or his or her attorney determines that the
interests of justice require otherwise and states the reasons for such
determination on the record, the record of such action or proceeding
shall be sealed and the clerk of the court wherein such criminal action
or proceeding was terminated shall immediately notify the commissioner
of the division of criminal justice services and the heads of all
appropriate police departments and other law enforcement agencies that
the action has been terminated in favor of the accused, and unless the
court has directed otherwise, that the record of such action or
proceeding shall be sealed. Upon receipt of notification of such
termination and sealing:
(a) every photograph of such person and photographic plate or proof,
and all palmprints and fingerprints taken or made of such person
pursuant to the provisions of this article in regard to the action or
proceeding terminated, except a dismissal pursuant to section 170.56 or
210.46 of this chapter, and all duplicates and copies thereof, except a
digital fingerprint image where authorized pursuant to paragraph (e) of
this subdivision, shall forthwith be, at the discretion of the recipient
agency, either destroyed or returned to such person, or to the attorney
who represented such person at the time of the termination of the action
or proceeding, at the address given by such person or attorney during
the action or proceeding, by the division of criminal justice services
and by any police department or law enforcement agency having any such
photograph, photographic plate or proof, palmprint or fingerprints in
its possession or under its control;
(b) any police department or law enforcement agency, including the
division of criminal justice services, which transmitted or otherwise
forwarded to any agency of the United States or of any other state or of
any other jurisdiction outside the state of New York copies of any such
photographs, photographic plates or proofs, palmprints and fingerprints,
including those relating to actions or proceedings which were dismissed
pursuant to section 170.56 or 210.46 of this chapter, shall forthwith
formally request in writing that all such copies be destroyed or
returned to the police department or law enforcement agency which
transmitted or forwarded them, and, if returned, such department or
agency shall, at its discretion, either destroy or return them as
provided herein, except that those relating to dismissals pursuant to
section 170.56 or 210.46 of this chapter shall not be destroyed or
returned by such department or agency;
(c) all official records and papers, including judgments and orders of
a court but not including published court decisions or opinions or
records and briefs on appeal, relating to the arrest or prosecution,
including all duplicates and copies thereof, on file with the division
of criminal justice services, any court, police agency, or prosecutor's
office shall be sealed and not made available to any person or public or
private agency;
(d) such records shall be made available to the person accused or to
such person's designated agent, and shall be made available to (i) a
prosecutor in any proceeding in which the accused has moved for an order
pursuant to section 170.56 or 210.46 of this chapter, or (ii) a law
enforcement agency upon ex parte motion in any superior court, or in any
district court, city court or the criminal court of the city of New York
provided that such court sealed the record, if such agency demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the court that justice requires that such records
be made available to it, or (iii) any state or local officer or agency
with responsibility for the issuance of licenses to possess guns, when
the accused has made application for such a license, or (iv) the New
York state department of corrections and community supervision when the
accused is on parole supervision as a result of conditional release or a
parole release granted by the New York state board of parole, and the
arrest which is the subject of the inquiry is one which occurred while
the accused was under such supervision, or (v) any prospective employer
of a police officer or peace officer as those terms are defined in
subdivisions thirty-three and thirty-four of section 1.20 of this
chapter, in relation to an application for employment as a police
officer or peace officer; provided, however, that every person who is an
applicant for the position of police officer or peace officer shall be
furnished with a copy of all records obtained under this paragraph and
afforded an opportunity to make an explanation thereto, or (vi) the
probation department responsible for supervision of the accused when the
arrest which is the subject of the inquiry is one which occurred while
the accused was under such supervision; and
(e) where fingerprints subject to the provisions of this section have
been received by the division of criminal justice services and have been
filed by the division as digital images, such images may be retained,
provided that a fingerprint card of the individual is on file with the
division which was not sealed pursuant to this section or section 160.55
of this article.
2. A report of the termination of the action or proceeding in favor of
the accused shall be sufficient notice of sealing to the commissioner of
the division of criminal justice services unless the report also
indicates that the court directed that the record not be sealed in the
interests of justice. Where the court has determined pursuant to
subdivision one of this section that sealing is not in the interest of
justice, the clerk of the court shall include notification of that
determination in any report to such division of the disposition of the
action or proceeding.
3. For the purposes of subdivision one of this section, a criminal
action or proceeding against a person shall be considered terminated in
favor of such person where:
(a) an order dismissing the entire accusatory instrument against such
person pursuant to article four hundred seventy was entered; or
(b) an order to dismiss the entire accusatory instrument against such
person pursuant to section 170.30, 170.50, 170.55, 170.56, 180.70,
210.20, 210.46 or 210.47 of this chapter was entered or deemed entered,
or an order terminating the prosecution against such person was entered
pursuant to section 180.85 of this chapter, and the people have not
appealed from such order or the determination of an appeal or appeals by
the people from such order has been against the people; or
(c) a verdict of complete acquittal was made pursuant to section
330.10 of this chapter; or
(d) a trial order of dismissal of the entire accusatory instrument
against such person pursuant to section 290.10 or 360.40 of this chapter
was entered and the people have not appealed from such order or the
determination of an appeal or appeals by the people from such order has
been against the people; or
(e) an order setting aside a verdict pursuant to section 330.30 or
370.10 of this chapter was entered and the people have not appealed from
such order or the determination of an appeal or appeals by the people
from such order has been against the people and no new trial has been
ordered; or
(f) an order vacating a judgment pursuant to section 440.10 of this
chapter was entered and the people have not appealed from such order or
the determination of an appeal or appeals by the people from such order
has been against the people, and no new trial has been ordered; or
(g) an order of discharge pursuant to article seventy of the civil
practice law and rules was entered on a ground which invalidates the
conviction and the people have not appealed from such order or the
determination of an appeal or appeals by the people from such order has
been against the people; or
(h) where all charges against such person are dismissed pursuant to
section 190.75 of this chapter. In such event, the clerk of the court
which empaneled the grand jury shall serve a certification of such
disposition upon the division of criminal justice services and upon the
appropriate police department or law enforcement agency which upon
receipt thereof, shall comply with the provisions of paragraphs (a),
(b), (c) and (d) of subdivision one of this section in the same manner
as is required thereunder with respect to an order of a court entered
pursuant to said subdivision one; or
(i) prior to the filing of an accusatory instrument in a local
criminal court against such person, the prosecutor elects not to
prosecute such person. In such event, the prosecutor shall serve a
certification of such disposition upon the division of criminal justice
services and upon the appropriate police department or law enforcement
agency which, upon receipt thereof, shall comply with the provisions of
paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of subdivision one of this section in
the same manner as is required thereunder with respect to an order of a
court entered pursuant to said subdivision one.
(j) following the arrest of such person, the arresting police agency,
prior to the filing of an accusatory instrument in a local criminal
court but subsequent to the forwarding of a copy of the fingerprints of
such person to the division of criminal justice services, elects not to
proceed further. In such event, the head of the arresting police agency
shall serve a certification of such disposition upon the division of
criminal justice services which, upon receipt thereof, shall comply with
the provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of subdivision one of
this section in the same manner as is required thereunder with respect
to an order of a court entered pursuant to said subdivision one.
(k) (i) The conviction was for a violation of article two hundred
twenty or section 240.36 of the penal law prior to the effective date of
article two hundred twenty-one of the penal law, and the sole controlled
substance involved was marihuana and the conviction was only for a
misdemeanor and/or violation; or
(ii) the conviction is for an offense defined in section 221.05 or
221.10 of the penal law prior to the effective date of chapter one
hundred thirty-two of the laws of two thousand nineteen; or
(iii) the conviction is for an offense defined in former section
221.05 221.10, 221.15, 221.20, 221.35, or 221.40 of the penal law; or
(iv) the conviction was for an offense defined in section 240.37 of
the penal law; or
(v) the conviction was for a violation of section 220.03 or 220.06 of
the penal law prior to the effective date of the chapter of the laws of
two thousand twenty-one that amended this paragraph, and the sole
controlled substance involved was concentrated cannabis; or
(vi) the conviction was for an offense defined in section 222.10,
222.15, 222.25 or 222.45 of the penal law.
No defendant shall be required or permitted to waive eligibility for
sealing or expungement pursuant to this section as part of a plea of
guilty, sentence or any agreement related to a conviction for a
violation of section 222.10, 222.15, 222.25 or 222.45 of the penal law
and any such waiver shall be deemed void and wholly unenforceable.
(l) An order dismissing an action pursuant to section 215.40 of this
chapter was entered.
4. A person in whose favor a criminal action or proceeding was
terminated, as defined in paragraph (a) through (h) of subdivision two
of this section, prior to the effective date of this section, may upon
motion apply to the court in which such termination occurred, upon not
less than twenty days notice to the district attorney, for an order
granting to such person the relief set forth in subdivision one of this
section, and such order shall be granted unless the district attorney
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that the interests of
justice require otherwise. A person in whose favor a criminal action or
proceeding was terminated, as defined in paragraph (i) or (j) of
subdivision two of this section, prior to the effective date of this
section, may apply to the appropriate prosecutor or police agency for a
certification as described in said paragraph (i) or (j) granting to such
person the relief set forth therein, and such certification shall be
granted by such prosecutor or police agency.
5. (a) Expungement of certain marihuana-related records. A conviction
for an offense described in paragraph (k) of subdivision three of this
section shall, on and after the effective date of this paragraph, in
accordance with the provisions of this paragraph, be vacated and
dismissed, and all records of such conviction or convictions and related
to such conviction or convictions shall be expunged, as described in
subdivision forty-five of section 1.20 of this chapter, and the matter
shall be considered terminated in favor of the accused and deemed a
nullity, having been rendered by this paragraph legally invalid. All
such records for an offense described in this paragraph where the
conviction was entered on or before the effective date of the chapter of
the laws of 2019 that amended this paragraph shall be expunged promptly
and, in any event, no later than one year after such effective date.
(b) Duties of certain state officials and law enforcement agencies.
Commencing upon the effective date of this paragraph:
(i) the chief administrator of the courts shall promptly notify the
commissioner of the division of criminal justice services and the heads
of all appropriate police departments, district attorney's offices and
other law enforcement agencies of all convictions that have been vacated
and dismissed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subdivision and that all
records related to such convictions shall be expunged and the matter
shall be considered terminated in favor of the accused and deemed a
nullity, having been rendered legally invalid. Upon receipt of
notification of such vacatur, dismissal and expungement, all records
relating to such conviction or convictions, or the criminal action or
proceeding, as the case may be, shall be marked as expunged by
conspicuously indicating on the face of the record and on each page or
at the beginning of the digitized file of the record that the record has
been designated as expunged. Upon the written request of the individual
whose case has been expunged or their designated agent, such records
shall be destroyed. Such records and papers shall not be made available
to any person, except the individual whose case has been expunged or
such person's designated agent; and
(ii) where automatic vacatur, dismissal, and expungement, including
record destruction if requested, is required by this subdivision but any
record of the court system in this state has not yet been updated to
reflect same (A) notwithstanding any other provision of law except as
provided in paragraph (d) of subdivision one of this section and
paragraph (e) of subdivision four of section eight hundred thirty-seven
of the executive law: (1) when the division of criminal justice services
conducts a search of its criminal history records, maintained pursuant
to subdivision six of section eight hundred thirty-seven of the
executive law, and returns a report thereon, all references to a
conviction for an offense described in paragraph (k) of subdivision
three of this section shall be excluded from such report; and (2) the
chief administrator of the courts shall develop and promulgate rules as
may be necessary to ensure that no written or electronic report of a
criminal history record search conducted by the office of court
administration contains information relating to a conviction for an
offense described in paragraph (k) of subdivision three of this section;
and (B) where court records relevant to such matter cannot be located or
have been destroyed, and a person or the person's attorney presents to
an appropriate court employee a fingerprint record of the New York state
division of criminal justice services, or a copy of a court disposition
record or other relevant court record, which indicates that a criminal
action or proceeding against such person was terminated by conviction of
an offense described in paragraph (k) of subdivision three of this
section, then promptly, and in any event within thirty days after such
notice to such court employee, the chief administrator of the courts or
his or her designee shall assure that such vacatur, dismissal, and
expungement, including record destruction if requested, have been
completed in accordance with subparagraph (i) of this paragraph.
(c) Vacatur, dismissal and expungement as set forth in this
subdivision is without prejudice to any person or such person's attorney
seeking further relief pursuant to article four hundred forty of this
chapter or any other law. Nothing in this section is intended or shall
be interpreted to diminish or abrogate any right or remedy otherwise
available to any person.
(d) The office of court administration, in conjunction with the
division of criminal justice services, shall develop an affirmative
information campaign and widely disseminate to the public, through its
website, public service announcements and other means, in multiple
languages and through multiple outlets, information concerning the
expungement, vacatur and resentencing of marihuana convictions
established by the chapter of the laws of two thousand nineteen that
added this paragraph, including, but not limited to, the automatic
expungement of certain past convictions, the means by which an
individual may file a motion for vacatur, dismissal and expungement of
certain past convictions, and the impact of such changes on such
person's criminal history records.
Order upon termination of criminal action by conviction for
noncriminal offense; entry of waiver; administrative
findings.
1. Regardless of the class of offense for which a person is initially
charged, upon the termination of a criminal action or proceeding against
a person by the conviction of such person of a traffic infraction or a
violation, other than the violation of operating a motor vehicle while
ability impaired as described in subdivision one of section eleven
hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, unless the district
attorney upon motion with not less than five days' notice to such person
or his or her attorney demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court
that the interests of justice require otherwise, or the court on its own
motion with not less than five days' notice to such person or his or her
attorney determines that the interests of justice require otherwise and
states the reasons for such determination on the record, the clerk of
the court wherein such criminal action or proceeding was terminated
shall immediately notify the commissioner of the division of criminal
justice services and the heads of all appropriate police departments and
other law enforcement agencies that the action has been terminated by
such conviction. Upon receipt of notification of such termination:
(a) every photograph of such person and photographic plate or proof,
and all palmprints and fingerprints taken or made of such person
pursuant to the provisions of this article in regard to the action or
proceeding terminated, and all duplicates and copies thereof, except a
digital fingerprint image where authorized pursuant to paragraph (e) of
this subdivision, except for the palmprints and fingerprints concerning
a disposition of harassment in the second degree as defined in section
240.26 of the penal law, committed against a member of the same family
or household as the defendant, as defined in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this chapter, and determined pursuant to subdivision eight-a
of section 170.10 of this title, shall forthwith be, at the discretion
of the recipient agency, either destroyed or returned to such person, or
to the attorney who represented such person at the time of the
termination of the action or proceeding, at the address given by such
person or attorney during the action or proceeding, by the division of
criminal justice services and by any police department or law
enforcement agency having any such photograph, photographic plate or
proof, palmprints or fingerprints in its possession or under its
control;
(b) any police department or law enforcement agency, including the
division of criminal justice services, which transmitted or otherwise
forwarded to any agency of the United States or of any other state or of
any other jurisdiction outside the state of New York copies of any such
photographs, photographic plates or proofs, palmprints and fingerprints,
shall forthwith formally request in writing that all such copies be
destroyed or returned to the police department or law enforcement agency
which transmitted or forwarded them, and upon such return such
department or agency shall, at its discretion, either destroy or return
them as provided herein;
(c) all official records and papers relating to the arrest or
prosecution, including all duplicates and copies thereof, on file with
the division of criminal justice services, police agency, or
prosecutor's office shall be sealed and not made available to any person
or public or private agency;
(d) the records referred to in paragraph (c) of this subdivision shall
be made available to the person accused or to such person's designated
agent, and shall be made available to (i) a prosecutor in any proceeding
in which the accused has moved for an order pursuant to section 170.56
or 210.46 of this chapter, or (ii) a law enforcement agency upon ex
parte motion in any superior court, or in any district court, city court
or the criminal court of the city of New York provided that such court
sealed the record, if such agency demonstrates to the satisfaction of
the court that justice requires that such records be made available to
it, or (iii) any state or local officer or agency with responsibility
for the issuance of licenses to possess guns, when the accused has made
application for such a license, or (iv) the New York state department of
corrections and community supervision when the accused is under parole
supervision as a result of conditional release or parole release granted
by the New York state board of parole and the arrest which is the
subject of the inquiry is one which occurred while the accused was under
such supervision, or (v) the probation department responsible for
supervision of the accused when the arrest which is the subject of the
inquiry is one which occurred while the accused was under such
supervision, or (vi) a police agency, probation department, sheriff's
office, district attorney's office, department of correction of any
municipality and parole department, for law enforcement purposes, upon
arrest in instances in which the individual stands convicted of
harassment in the second degree, as defined in section 240.26 of the
penal law, committed against a member of the same family or household as
the defendant, as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter, and determined pursuant to subdivision eight-a of section
170.10 of this title; and
(e) where fingerprints subject to the provisions of this section have
been received by the division of criminal justice services and have been
filed by the division as digital images, such images may be retained,
provided that a fingerprint card of the individual is on file with the
division which was not sealed pursuant to this section or section 160.50
of this article.
2. A report of the termination of the action or proceeding by
conviction of a traffic violation or a violation other than the
violation of operating a motor vehicle while ability impaired as
described in subdivision one of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the
vehicle and traffic law, shall be sufficient notice of sealing to the
commissioner of the division of criminal justice services unless the
report also indicates that the court directed that the record not be
sealed in the interests of justice. Where the court has determined
pursuant to subdivision one of this section that sealing is not in the
interests of justice, the clerk of the court shall include notification
of that determination in any report to such division of the disposition
of the action or proceeding. When the defendant has been found guilty of
a violation of harassment in the second degree and it was determined
pursuant to subdivision eight-a of section 170.10 of this title that
such violation was committed against a member of the same family or
household as the defendant, the clerk of the court shall include
notification of that determination in any report to such division of the
disposition of the action or proceeding for purposes of paragraph (a)
and subparagraph (vi) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of this
section.
3. A person against whom a criminal action or proceeding was
terminated by such person's conviction of a traffic infraction or
violation other than the violation of operating a motor vehicle while
ability impaired as described in subdivision one of section eleven
hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, prior to the
effective date of this section, may upon motion apply to the court in
which such termination occurred, upon not less than twenty days notice
to the district attorney, for an order granting to such person the
relief set forth in subdivision one of this section, and such order
shall be granted unless the district attorney demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the court that the interests of justice require
otherwise.
4. This section shall not apply to an action terminated in a manner
described in paragraph (k) of subdivision two of section 160.50 of this
chapter.
5. (a) When a criminal action or proceeding is terminated against a
person by the entry of a waiver of a hearing pursuant to paragraph (c)
of subdivision ten of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle
and traffic law or section forty-nine-b of the navigation law, the
record of the criminal action shall be sealed in accordance with this
subdivision. Upon the entry of such waiver, the court or the clerk of
the court shall immediately notify the commissioner of the division of
criminal justice services and the heads of all appropriate police
departments and other law enforcement agencies that a waiver has been
entered and that the record of the action shall be sealed when the
person reaches the age of twenty-one or three years from the date of
commission of the offense, whichever is the greater period of time. At
the expiration of such period, the commissioner of the division of
criminal justice services and the heads of all appropriate police
departments and other law enforcement agencies shall take the actions
required by paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subdivision one of section
160.50 of this article.
(b) Where a person under the age of twenty-one is referred by the
police to the department of motor vehicles for action pursuant to
section eleven hundred ninety-two-a or eleven hundred ninety-four-a of
the vehicle and traffic law, or section forty-nine-b of the navigation
law and a finding in favor of the motorist or operator is rendered, the
commissioner of the department of motor vehicles shall, as soon as
practicable, but not later than three years from the date of commission
of the offense or when such person reaches the age of twenty-one,
whichever is the greater period of time, notify the commissioner of the
division of criminal justice services and the heads of all appropriate
police departments and other law enforcement agencies that such finding
in favor of the motorist or operator was rendered. Upon receipt of such
notification, the commissioner of the division of criminal justice
services and the heads of such police departments and other law
enforcement agencies shall take the actions required by paragraphs (a),
(b) and (c) of subdivision one of section 160.50 of this article.
(c) Where a person under the age of twenty-one is referred by the
police to the department of motor vehicles for action pursuant to
section eleven hundred ninety-two-a or eleven hundred ninety-four-a of
the vehicle and traffic law, or section forty-nine-b of the navigation
law, and no notification is received by the commissioner of the division
of criminal justice services and the heads of all appropriate police
departments and other law enforcement agencies pursuant to paragraph (b)
of this subdivision, such commissioner of the division of criminal
justice services and such heads of police departments and other law
enforcement agencies shall, after three years from the date of
commission of the offense or when the person reaches the age of
twenty-one, whichever is the greater period of time, take the actions
required by paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subdivision one of section
160.50 of this article.
Automatic sealing of convictions.
1. Convictions for certain traffic infractions or a crime defined in
the laws of this state shall be sealed in accordance with this section
as follows:
(a) Convictions for subdivision one of section eleven hundred
ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law shall be sealed after three
years.
(b) Criminal convictions shall be sealed upon satisfaction of the
following conditions:
(i) for a misdemeanor conviction, at least three years have passed
from the defendant's release from incarceration or the imposition of
sentence if there was no sentence of incarceration. If the defendant is
subsequently convicted of a crime before a prior conviction is sealed
pursuant to this section, the calculation of time for such prior
conviction shall start upon the same date as the time calculation starts
for the subsequent criminal conviction;
(ii) for a felony conviction, at least eight years have passed from
the date the defendant was last released from incarceration for the
sentence of the conviction eligible for sealing or from the imposition
of sentence if there was no sentence of incarceration. A defendant's
detention for an alleged violation of parole or post-release supervision
shall not interfere with the time calculation prescribed herein unless
and until supervision is revoked resulting in the defendant's
reincarceration. If the defendant is subsequently convicted of a crime
before a prior conviction is sealed pursuant to this section, the
calculation of time for such prior conviction shall start upon the same
date as the time calculation starts for the subsequent criminal
conviction;
(iii) the defendant does not have a subsequent criminal charge pending
in this state;
(iv) the defendant is not currently under the supervision of any
probation or parole department for the conviction eligible for sealing;
(v) the conviction is not for an offense defined as a sex offense or
sexually violent offense under section one hundred sixty-eight-a of the
correction law;
(vi) the conviction is not for a class A felony offense defined in the
penal law, other than class A felony offenses defined in article two
hundred twenty of the penal law;
(vii) the defendant is a natural person;
(viii) the defendant does not have a subsequent felony charge pending
in another jurisdiction that is not a felony charge related to
reproductive or gender affirming care or the possession of cannabis
which would not constitute a felony in New York. This subparagraph shall
apply if and when appropriate federal authorities grant access to
records necessary to query to effectuate the purposes of this
subparagraph in an automated manner; and
(ix) the defendant does not have a subsequent felony conviction in
another jurisdiction in the preceding eight years that is not a felony
conviction related to reproductive or gender affirming care or the
possession of cannabis which would not constitute a felony in New York.
This subparagraph shall apply if and when appropriate federal
authorities grant access to records necessary to query to effectuate the
purposes of this subparagraph in an automated manner.
(c) If, after the applicable period of time for the sealing of a
conviction has been satisfied, the conviction remains ineligible for
sealing pursuant to subparagraphs (iii), (iv), (viii) or (ix) of
paragraph (b) of this subdivision, the office of court administration
shall subsequently check for eligibility no less than quarterly and upon
subsequent checks, or the receipt of a form in accordance with paragraph
(dd) of subdivision two of section two hundred twelve of the judiciary
law, the conviction shall be sealed if all other conditions for sealing
under this section are satisfied.
(d) In accordance with all other applicable laws, rules, and
regulations regarding the scope, access, use, disclosure,
confidentiality and retention of criminal history information, records
of convictions sealed pursuant to this section including photographs,
photographic plates or proofs, palmprints, fingerprints or retina scans
shall not be accessed by or made available to any person or public or
private agency, except for:
(i) the defendant and such defendant's counsel;
(ii) any court, defense counsel or prosecutor for the purposes of a
pending criminal proceeding or proceedings brought in a criminal court
pursuant to article six-C of the correction law;
(iii) qualified agencies, as defined in subdivision nine of section
eight hundred thirty-five of the executive law, federal and state law
enforcement agencies, and interstate and international authorities as
defined in subdivision three of section two of the public authorities
law, when acting within the scope of their law enforcement duties;
(iv) the court, prosecutor, and defense counsel if the defendant
becomes a witness in a criminal proceeding;
(v) the court and parties if the defendant becomes a witness or party
in a civil proceeding;
(vi) when an individual is a defendant in a criminal proceeding or
proceedings brought in a criminal court pursuant to article six-C of the
correction law and the sealed records of conviction of a third party are
integral to their defense. In such instances, use of sealed records of
conviction shall be requested upon ex parte motion in any superior
court, or in any district court, city court or the criminal court of the
city of New York provided that such court is where the action is
pending. The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court
that the records will be used for the purpose of this subparagraph;
(vii) individuals or entities that are required by a local law in
effect one year prior to the chapter of the laws of two thousand
twenty-three that added this section, a state law, or a federal law or
regulation to request and receive a fingerprint-based check of criminal
history information. Nothing herein shall prohibit the commissioner of
education or the office of school personnel review and accountability
from receiving or using convictions sealed pursuant to this section for
purposes of subdivisions seven, seven-a and seven-b of section three
hundred five of the education law;
(viii) individuals or entities that are authorized by a local law in
effect one year prior to the chapter of the laws of two thousand
twenty-three that added this section, a state law, or a federal law or
regulation to request and receive a fingerprint-based check of criminal
history information in relation to the individual's fitness to have
responsibility for the safety and well-being of children or adolescents,
elderly individuals, individuals with disabilities, or otherwise
vulnerable populations. The division of criminal justice services shall
maintain an up to date list of citations of the local, state, and
federal statutes or federal regulations authorizing the access described
herein;
(ix) any prospective employer of a police officer or peace officer as
those terms are defined in subdivisions thirty-three and thirty-four of
section 1.20 of this chapter, in relation to an application for
employment as a police officer or peace officer, provided, however, that
every person who is an applicant shall be furnished with a copy of all
records obtained under this paragraph and afforded an opportunity to
make an explanation thereto;
(x) any federal, state or local officer or agency with responsibility
for the issuance of licenses to possess a firearm, rifle or shotgun or
with responsibility for conducting background checks before transfer or
sale of a firearm or explosive, when the officer or agency is acting
pursuant to such responsibility. This includes the criminal justice
information services division of the federal bureau of investigation,
for the purposes of responding to queries to the national instant
background check system regarding attempts to purchase or otherwise take
possession of firearms, rifles or shotguns, as defined in 18 U.S.C. §
921 (A)(3);
(xi) for the purposes of civilian investigation or evaluation of a
civilian complaint or civil action concerning law enforcement or
prosecution actions, upon ex parte motion in any superior court, or in
any district court, city court or the criminal court of the city of New
York provided that such court sealed the record; the applicant must
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that the records will be
used for the purposes of this subparagraph;
(xii) for information provided to an individual or entity pursuant to
paragraph (e) of subdivision four of section eight hundred thirty-seven
of the executive law or for bona fide research purposes provided all
identifying information is removed;
(xiii) when an individual seeks to avail themselves of a public
program or benefit, including but not limited to an immigration benefit,
for which the sealed records of conviction of a third party are
otherwise authorized by law or legal process to be disclosed in
furtherance of their application for such program or benefit. In such
instances, the individual or their attorney shall request the use of
sealed records pursuant to a form as prescribed by the chief
administrator of the courts pursuant to paragraph (ee) of subdivision
two of section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law;
(xiv) for the purpose of collection of restitution, reparation, fines,
surcharges, or fees imposed. In such instances, use of sealed records
shall be requested upon ex parte motion in any superior court, or in any
district court, city court, town court, village court, or criminal court
of the city of New York provided that such court is where the action is
pending. The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court
that the records will be used for the purpose of this subparagraph;
(xv) transportation network companies that are required or authorized
by state law to request criminal history information pursuant to section
sixteen hundred ninety-nine of the vehicle and traffic law;
(xvi) the state education department for the purposes of investigating
professional misconduct as defined in subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a)
of subdivision five of section sixty-five hundred nine of the education
law, consideration of restoration of a professional license pursuant to
section sixty-five hundred eleven of the education law, or
determinations for issuing a license to practice a profession or issuing
certificates and privileges for which prior licensure is required, for
the professions under articles one hundred thirty-one, one hundred
thirty-one-b, one hundred thirty-two, one hundred thirty-three, one
hundred thirty-four, one hundred thirty-five, one hundred thirty-six,
one hundred thirty-seven, one hundred thirty-nine, one hundred forty,
one hundred forty-one, one hundred forty-three, one hundred forty-four,
one hundred forty-five, one hundred forty-seven, one hundred forty-nine,
one hundred fifty-three, one hundred fifty-four, one hundred fifty-five,
one hundred fifty-six, one hundred fifty-seven, one hundred fifty-nine,
one hundred sixty, one hundred sixty-two, one hundred sixty-three, one
hundred sixty-four, and one hundred sixty-seven as such professions are
defined in title eight of the education law, provided that the state
education department certifies to the division of criminal justice
services that it is investigating an individual licensed to practice a
profession pursuant to article one hundred thirty of the education law
for professional misconduct as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision
five of section sixty-five hundred nine of the education law,
considering restoration of a professional license pursuant to section
sixty-five hundred eleven of the education law, or making a
determination for issuing a license to practice a profession or issuing
certificates and privileges for which prior licensure is required as
appropriate. Provided, further, that the board of regents may consider
any prior conviction that formed the basis of a determination of the
board of regents in a disciplinary proceeding pursuant to section
sixty-five hundred ten of the education law and the rules and
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto in an application for
reconsideration, even if such conviction later becomes sealed pursuant
to this section; and
(xvii) the office of mental health and the office for people with
developmental disabilities, where such agencies are statutorily
authorized to receive such information, provided further, that such
information may also be made available for case review under section
10.05 of the mental hygiene law, as well as to providers licensed,
funded, designated, certified or otherwise authorized by the office of
mental health or the office for people with developmental disabilities,
where such information is included in the clinical record of any person
under the care of or receiving services from such provider or program.
(e) Where the sealing required by this section has not taken place,
including where supporting court records cannot be located or have been
destroyed, and a defendant or their attorney submits a valid form in
accordance with paragraph (dd) of subdivision two of section two hundred
twelve of the judiciary law of such fact to the office of court
administration, such conviction shall be sealed as set forth in this
subdivision within thirty days of the receipt of such form.
(f) The department of corrections and community supervision, in
coordination with the division of criminal justice services, shall
provide the office of court administration with the data necessary to
determine appropriate records to be sealed pursuant to this section,
including but not limited to (i) the date or dates of release from state
incarceration of individuals who have a sentence of incarceration for a
felony conviction, and (ii) the date or dates of initial parole or
post-release supervision and corresponding date or dates of discharge,
as applicable.
(g) The chief administrative officer of each local correctional
facility shall provide the office of court administration with the data
necessary to determine appropriate records to be sealed pursuant to this
section, including but not limited to the date or dates of release of
individuals who have satisfied a definite sentence of imprisonment.
2. Upon the sealing of a conviction pursuant to this section the
office of court administration shall immediately notify the division of
criminal justice services, the court of conviction, county clerks and
the heads of all appropriate police and sheriff departments,
prosecutors' offices and law enforcement agencies that the conviction is
sealed. Upon receipt of such notification, records of or relating to
such conviction shall be immediately sealed as follows:
(a) Every photograph of the defendant and photographic plates or
proof, and all palmprints, fingerprints and retina scans taken or made
of the defendant in regard to the sealed conviction, and all duplicates,
reproductions, and copies thereof, except a digital fingerprint that is
on file with the division of criminal justice services for a conviction
that has not been sealed pursuant to this section, shall be marked as
sealed by any entity notified under this subdivision having any such
photograph, photographic plate or proof, palmprint, fingerprints or
retina scan in its possession or under its control by conspicuously
indicating on the face of the record or at the beginning of the
digitized file of the record that the record has been designated as
sealed.
(b) Every official record and paper and duplicates and copies thereof,
including, but not limited to, judgments and orders of a court but not
including published court decisions or opinions or records and briefs on
appeal, relating to the sealed conviction, on file with the entity
notified under this subdivision shall be marked as sealed by
conspicuously indicating on the face of the record or at the beginning
of the digitized file of the record that the record has been designated
as sealed.
(c) Entities subject to the requirements of this subdivision shall not
use or access such sealed information unless otherwise authorized
pursuant to this section or any other section of law.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere with the
applicable laws, rules and regulations requiring the division of
criminal justice services to administer and maintain criminal history
records as set forth in article thirty-five of the executive law.
3. (a) Nothing in this section requires the sealing or destruction of
DNA information maintained in the New York state DNA database, in
accordance with article forty-nine-B of the executive law, of an
individual whose conviction is sealed under this section.
(b) Nothing in this section requires the sealing or destruction of
records maintained by the department of motor vehicles, and nothing in
this section shall be construed to contravene the vehicle and traffic
law, the federal driver's privacy protection act (18 U.S.C 2721 et.
seq.), the REAL ID Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-13; 49 U.S.C. 30301
note), section 7209 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C. 31311), the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act
of 1986 (Public Law 99-570; 49 U.S.C. 313), the Motor Carrier Safety
Improvement Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-159), or regulations promulgated
pursuant to any such chapter or act.
(c) The division of criminal justice services is authorized to
disclose a conviction that is sealed pursuant to this section to
entities that are required by federal law, or by rules and regulations
promulgated by a self-regulatory organization created under federal law,
to consider sealed convictions. Such entities must certify to the
division that they are required by federal law, or by rules and
regulations promulgated by a self-regulatory organization that has been
created under federal law, to make an inquiry about or consider records
sealed pursuant to this section for purposes of employment, licensing,
or clearance. To the extent permitted by federal law, a record sealed
pursuant to this section may not be considered a conviction that would
prohibit the employment, licensing or clearance of the defendant.
(d) Nothing in this section shall prohibit entities required by
federal law to consider sealed convictions, or by rules and regulations
promulgated by a self-regulatory organization that has been created
under federal law, from making an inquiry about or considering an
applicant's criminal history for purposes of employment, licensing, or
clearance from inquiring into convictions sealed pursuant to this
section.
(e) In any civil action, an official record of a conviction that has
been sealed pursuant to this section may not be introduced as evidence
of negligence against a person or entity that provided employment,
contract labor or services, volunteer work, licensing, tenancy, a home
purchase, a mortgage, an education, a loan, or insurance if such record
was sealed and was not provided to the person or entity by or on behalf
of a governmental entity in accordance with this section in response to
such person's or entity's authorized and timely request for conviction
history information.
(f) A person or entity described in this subdivision, acting
reasonably and in good faith, may not have a duty to investigate the
fact of a prior conviction that has been sealed pursuant to this
section.
4. No defendant shall be required or permitted to waive eligibility
for sealing pursuant to this section as part of a plea of guilty,
sentence or any agreement related to a conviction for a violation of the
laws of this state. Any such waiver is void and unenforceable.
5. Sealing as set forth in subdivision two of this section is without
prejudice to a defendant or their attorney seeking further relief
pursuant to article four hundred forty of this chapter. Nothing in this
section is intended or shall be interpreted to diminish or abrogate any
rights or remedies otherwise available to the defendant.
6. The office of court administration shall make diligent efforts to
promptly seal all conviction records eligible for sealing under this
section where such convictions were entered on or before the effective
date of this section and, in any event, shall ensure sealing of such
convictions is complete no later than three years after such effective
date.
7. A conviction which is sealed pursuant to this section is included
within the definition of a conviction for the purposes of any criminal
proceeding in which the fact of a prior conviction would enhance a
penalty or is an element of the offense charged.
8. Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit sealing of a
conviction before the expiration or termination of a sentence of
incarceration, parole, probation, or post-release supervision for such
conviction.
9. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or invalidate
any active order of protection issued in relation to a conviction sealed
under this section.
10. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require or authorize
the discharge of the requirement to pay any restitution, reparation,
fines, surcharges, or fees imposed for a conviction sealed under this
section or the sealing of a criminal or civil proceeding for the
collection of any such amount due, unless such proceeding is otherwise
eligible for sealing under this section or any other provision of law.
Conditional sealing of certain controlled substance, marihuana
or specified offense convictions.
1. A defendant convicted of any offense defined in article two hundred
twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law or a specified offense
defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter who has
successfully completed a judicial diversion program under article two
hundred sixteen of this chapter, or one of the programs heretofore known
as drug treatment alternative to prison or another judicially sanctioned
drug treatment program of similar duration, requirements and level of
supervision, and has completed the sentence imposed for the offense or
offenses, is eligible to have such offense or offenses sealed pursuant
to this section.
2. The court that sentenced the defendant to a judicially sanctioned
drug treatment program may on its own motion, or on the defendant's
motion, order that all official records and papers relating to the
arrest, prosecution and conviction which resulted in the defendant's
participation in the judicially sanctioned drug treatment program be
conditionally sealed. In such case, the court may also conditionally
seal the arrest, prosecution and conviction records for no more than
three of the defendant's prior eligible misdemeanors, which for purposes
of this subdivision shall be limited to misdemeanor offenses defined in
article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law.
The court may only seal the records of the defendant's arrests,
prosecutions and convictions when:
(a) the sentencing court has requested and received from the division
of criminal justice services or the Federal Bureau of Investigation a
fingerprint based criminal history record of the defendant, including
any sealed or suppressed information. The division of criminal justice
services shall also include a criminal history report, if any, from the
Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding any criminal history
information that occurred in other jurisdictions. The division is hereby
authorized to receive such information from the Federal Bureau of
Investigation for this purpose. The parties shall be permitted to
examine these records;
(b) the defendant or court has identified the misdemeanor conviction
or convictions for which relief may be granted;
(c) the court has received documentation that the sentences imposed on
the eligible misdemeanor convictions have been completed, or if no such
documentation is reasonably available, a sworn affidavit that the
sentences imposed on the prior misdemeanors have been completed; and
(d) the court has notified the district attorney of each jurisdiction
in which the defendant has been convicted of an offense with respect to
which sealing is sought, and the court or courts of record for such
offenses, that the court is considering sealing the records of the
defendant's eligible misdemeanor convictions. Both the district attorney
and the court shall be given a reasonable opportunity, which shall not
be less than thirty days, in which to comment and submit materials to
aid the court in making such a determination.
3. At the request of the defendant or the district attorney of a
county in which the defendant committed a crime that is the subject of
the sealing application, the court may conduct a hearing to consider and
review any relevant evidence offered by either party that would aid the
court in its decision whether to seal the records of the defendant's
arrests, prosecutions and convictions. In making such a determination,
the court shall consider any relevant factors, including but not limited
to: (i) the circumstances and seriousness of the offense or offenses
that resulted in the conviction or convictions; (ii) the character of
the defendant, including his or her completion of the judicially
sanctioned treatment program as described in subdivision one of this
section; (iii) the defendant's criminal history; and (iv) the impact of
sealing the defendant's records upon his or her rehabilitation and his
or her successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society,
and on public safety.
4. When a court orders sealing pursuant to this section, all official
records and papers relating to the arrests, prosecutions, and
convictions, including all duplicates and copies thereof, on file with
the division of criminal justice services or any court shall be sealed
and not made available to any person or public or private agency;
provided, however, the division shall retain any fingerprints,
palmprints and photographs, or digital images of the same.
5. When the court orders sealing pursuant to this section, the clerk
of such court shall immediately notify the commissioner of the division
of criminal justice services, and any court that sentenced the defendant
for an offense which has been conditionally sealed, regarding the
records that shall be sealed pursuant to this section.
6. Records sealed pursuant to this subdivision shall be made available
to:
(a) the defendant or the defendant's designated agent;
(b) qualified agencies, as defined in subdivision nine of section
eight hundred thirty-five of the executive law, and federal and state
law enforcement agencies, when acting within the scope of their law
enforcement duties; or
(c) any state or local officer or agency with responsibility for the
issuance of licenses to possess guns, when the person has made
application for such a license; or
(d) any prospective employer of a police officer or peace officer as
those terms are defined in subdivisions thirty-three and thirty-four of
section 1.20 of this chapter, in relation to an application for
employment as a police officer or peace officer; provided, however, that
every person who is an applicant for the position of police officer or
peace officer shall be furnished with a copy of all records obtained
under this paragraph and afforded an opportunity to make an explanation
thereto.
7. The court shall not seal the defendant's record pursuant to this
section while any charged offense is pending.
8. If, subsequent to the sealing of records pursuant to this
subdivision, the person who is the subject of such records is arrested
for or formally charged with any misdemeanor or felony offense, such
records shall be unsealed immediately and remain unsealed; provided,
however, that if such new misdemeanor or felony arrest results in a
termination in favor of the accused as defined in subdivision three of
section 160.50 of this article or by conviction for a non criminal
offense as described in section 160.55 of this article, such unsealed
records shall be conditionally sealed pursuant to this section.
Sealing of certain convictions.
1. Definitions: As used in this section, the following terms shall
have the following meanings:
(a) "Eligible offense" shall mean any crime defined in the laws of
this state other than a sex offense defined in article one hundred
thirty of the penal law, an offense defined in article two hundred
sixty-three of the penal law, a felony offense defined in article one
hundred twenty-five of the penal law, a violent felony offense defined
in section 70.02 of the penal law, a class A felony offense defined in
the penal law, a felony offense defined in article one hundred five of
the penal law where the underlying offense is not an eligible offense,
an attempt to commit an offense that is not an eligible offense if the
attempt is a felony, or an offense for which registration as a sex
offender is required pursuant to article six-C of the correction law.
For the purposes of this section, where the defendant is convicted of
more than one eligible offense, committed as part of the same criminal
transaction as defined in subdivision two of section 40.10 of this
chapter, those offenses shall be considered one eligible offense.
(b) "Sentencing judge" shall mean the judge who pronounced sentence
upon the conviction under consideration, or if that judge is no longer
sitting in a court in the jurisdiction in which the conviction was
obtained, any other judge who is sitting in the criminal court where the
judgment of conviction was entered.
1-a. The chief administrator of the courts shall, pursuant to section
10.40 of this chapter, prescribe a form application which may be used by
a defendant to apply for sealing pursuant to this section. Such form
application shall include all the essential elements required by this
section to be included in an application for sealing. Nothing in this
subdivision shall be read to require a defendant to use such form
application to apply for sealing.
2. (a) A defendant who has been convicted of up to two eligible
offenses but not more than one felony offense may apply to the court in
which he or she was convicted of the most serious offense to have such
conviction or convictions sealed. If all offenses are offenses with the
same classification, the application shall be made to the court in which
the defendant was last convicted.
(b) An application shall contain (i) a copy of a certificate of
disposition or other similar documentation for any offense for which the
defendant has been convicted, or an explanation of why such certificate
or other documentation is not available; (ii) a sworn statement of the
defendant as to whether he or she has filed, or then intends to file,
any application for sealing of any other eligible offense; (iii) a copy
of any other such application that has been filed; (iv) a sworn
statement as to the conviction or convictions for which relief is being
sought; and (v) a sworn statement of the reason or reasons why the court
should, in its discretion, grant such sealing, along with any supporting
documentation.
(c) A copy of any application for such sealing shall be served upon
the district attorney of the county in which the conviction, or, if more
than one, the convictions, was or were obtained. The district attorney
shall notify the court within forty-five days if he or she objects to
the application for sealing.
(d) When such application is filed with the court, it shall be
assigned to the sentencing judge unless more than one application is
filed in which case the application shall be assigned to the county
court or the supreme court of the county in which the criminal court is
located, who shall request and receive from the division of criminal
justice services a fingerprint based criminal history record of the
defendant, including any sealed or suppressed records. The division of
criminal justice services also shall include a criminal history report,
if any, from the federal bureau of investigation regarding any criminal
history information that occurred in other jurisdictions. The division
is hereby authorized to receive such information from the federal bureau
of investigation for this purpose, and to make such information
available to the court, which may make this information available to the
district attorney and the defendant.
3. The sentencing judge, or county or supreme court shall summarily
deny the defendant's application when:
(a) the defendant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant
to article six-C of the correction law; or
(b) the defendant has previously obtained sealing of the maximum
number of convictions allowable under section 160.58 of the criminal
procedure law; or
(c) the defendant has previously obtained sealing of the maximum
number of convictions allowable under subdivision four of this section;
or
(d) the time period specified in subdivision five of this section has
not yet been satisfied; or
(e) the defendant has an undisposed arrest or charge pending; or
(f) the defendant was convicted of any crime after the date of the
entry of judgement of the last conviction for which sealing is sought;
or
(g) the defendant has failed to provide the court with the required
sworn statement of the reasons why the court should grant the relief
requested; or
(h) the defendant has been convicted of two or more felonies or more
than two crimes.
4. Provided that the application is not summarily denied for the
reasons set forth in subdivision three of this section, a defendant who
stands convicted of up to two eligible offenses, may obtain sealing of
no more than two eligible offenses but not more than one felony offense.
5. Any eligible offense may be sealed only after at least ten years
have passed since the imposition of the sentence on the defendant's
latest conviction or, if the defendant was sentenced to a period of
incarceration, including a period of incarceration imposed in
conjunction with a sentence of probation, the defendant's latest release
from incarceration. In calculating the ten year period under this
subdivision, any period of time the defendant spent incarcerated after
the conviction for which the application for sealing is sought, shall be
excluded and such ten year period shall be extended by a period or
periods equal to the time served under such incarceration.
6. Upon determining that the application is not subject to mandatory
denial pursuant to subdivision three of this section and that the
application is opposed by the district attorney, the sentencing judge or
county or supreme court shall conduct a hearing on the application in
order to consider any evidence offered by either party that would aid
the sentencing judge in his or her decision whether to seal the records
of the defendant's convictions. No hearing is required if the district
attorney does not oppose the application.
7. In considering any such application, the sentencing judge or county
or supreme court shall consider any relevant factors, including but not
limited to:
(a) the amount of time that has elapsed since the defendant's last
conviction;
(b) the circumstances and seriousness of the offense for which the
defendant is seeking relief, including whether the arrest charge was not
an eligible offense;
(c) the circumstances and seriousness of any other offenses for which
the defendant stands convicted;
(d) the character of the defendant, including any measures that the
defendant has taken toward rehabilitation, such as participating in
treatment programs, work, or schooling, and participating in community
service or other volunteer programs;
(e) any statements made by the victim of the offense for which the
defendant is seeking relief;
(f) the impact of sealing the defendant's record upon his or her
rehabilitation and upon his or her successful and productive reentry and
reintegration into society; and
(g) the impact of sealing the defendant's record on public safety and
upon the public's confidence in and respect for the law.
8. When a sentencing judge or county or supreme court orders sealing
pursuant to this section, all official records and papers relating to
the arrests, prosecutions, and convictions, including all duplicates and
copies thereof, on file with the division of criminal justice services
or any court shall be sealed and not made available to any person or
public or private agency except as provided for in subdivision nine of
this section; provided, however, the division shall retain any
fingerprints, palmprints and photographs, or digital images of the same.
The clerk of such court shall immediately notify the commissioner of the
division of criminal justice services regarding the records that shall
be sealed pursuant to this section. The clerk also shall notify any
court in which the defendant has stated, pursuant to paragraph (b) of
subdivision two of this section, that he or she has filed or intends to
file an application for sealing of any other eligible offense.
9. Records sealed pursuant to this section shall be made available to:
(a) the defendant or the defendant's designated agent;
(b) qualified agencies, as defined in subdivision nine of section
eight hundred thirty-five of the executive law, and federal and state
law enforcement agencies, when acting within the scope of their law
enforcement duties; or
(c) any state or local officer or agency with responsibility for the
issuance of licenses to possess guns, when the person has made
application for such a license; or
(d) any prospective employer of a police officer or peace officer as
those terms are defined in subdivisions thirty-three and thirty-four of
section 1.20 of this chapter, in relation to an application for
employment as a police officer or peace officer; provided, however, that
every person who is an applicant for the position of police officer or
peace officer shall be furnished with a copy of all records obtained
under this paragraph and afforded an opportunity to make an explanation
thereto; or
(e) the criminal justice information services division of the federal
bureau of investigation, for the purposes of responding to queries to
the national instant criminal background check system regarding attempts
to purchase or otherwise take possession of firearms, as defined in 18
USC 921 (a) (3).
10. A conviction which is sealed pursuant to this section is included
within the definition of a conviction for the purposes of any criminal
proceeding in which the fact of a prior conviction would enhance a
penalty or is an element of the offense charged.
11. No defendant shall be required or permitted to waive eligibility
for sealing pursuant to this section as part of a plea of guilty,
sentence or any agreement related to a conviction for an eligible
offense and any such waiver shall be deemed void and wholly
unenforceable.
Effect of termination of criminal actions in favor of the
accused.
Upon the termination of a criminal action or proceeding against a
person in favor of such person, as defined in subdivision two of section
160.50 of this chapter, the arrest and prosecution shall be deemed a
nullity and the accused shall be restored, in contemplation of law, to
the status he occupied before the arrest and prosecution. The arrest or
prosecution shall not operate as a disqualification of any person so
accused to pursue or engage in any lawful activity, occupation,
profession, or calling. Except where specifically required or permitted
by statute or upon specific authorization of a superior court, no such
person shall be required to divulge information pertaining to the arrest
or prosecution.
ARTICLE 170 Proceedings Upon Information, Simplified Traffic Information, Prosecutor's Information and Misdemeanor Complaint From Arraignment to Plea
Arraignment upon information, simplified traffic information,
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint;
defendant's presence, defendant's rights, court's
instructions and bail matters.
1. Following the filing with a local criminal court of an information,
a simplified information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor
complaint, the defendant must be arraigned thereon. The defendant must
appear personally at such arraignment except under the following
circumstances:
(a) In any case where a simplified information is filed and a
procedure is provided by law which is applicable to all offenses charged
in such simplified information and, if followed, would dispense with an
arraignment or personal appearance of the defendant, nothing contained
in this section affects the validity of such procedure or requires such
personal appearance;
(b) In any case in which the defendant's appearance is required by a
summons or an appearance ticket, the court in its discretion may, for
good cause shown, permit the defendant to appear by counsel instead of
in person.
2. Upon any arraignment at which the defendant is personally present,
the court must immediately inform him, or cause him to be informed in
its presence, of the charge or charges against him and must furnish him
with a copy of the accusatory instrument.
3. The defendant has the right to the aid of counsel at the
arraignment and at every subsequent stage of the action. If he appears
upon such arraignment without counsel, he has the following rights:
(a) To an adjournment for the purpose of obtaining counsel; and
(b) To communicate, free of charge, by letter or by telephone provided
by the law enforcement facility where the defendant is held to a phone
number located in the United States, or Puerto Rico, for the purposes of
obtaining counsel and informing a relative or friend that he or she has
been charged with an offense; and
(c) To have counsel assigned by the court if he is financially unable
to obtain the same; except that this paragraph does not apply where the
accusatory instrument charges a traffic infraction or infractions only.
4. Except as provided in subdivision five, the court must inform the
defendant:
(a) Of his rights as prescribed in subdivision three; and the court
must not only accord him opportunity to exercise such rights but must
itself take such affirmative action as is necessary to effectuate them;
and
(b) Where a traffic infraction or a misdemeanor relating to traffic is
charged, that a judgment of conviction for such offense would in
addition to subjecting the defendant to the sentence provided therefor
render his license to drive a motor vehicle and his certificate of
registration subject to suspension and revocation as prescribed by law
and that a plea of guilty to such offense constitutes a conviction
thereof to the same extent as a verdict of guilty after trial; and
(c) Where the accusatory instrument is a simplified traffic
information, that the defendant has a right to have a supporting
deposition filed, as provided in section 100.25; and
(d) Where the accusatory instrument is a misdemeanor complaint, that
the defendant may not be prosecuted thereon or required to enter a plea
thereto unless he consents to the same, and that in the absence of such
consent such misdemeanor complaint will for prosecution purposes have to
be replaced and superseded by an information; and
(e) Where an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information, a misdemeanor complaint, a felony complaint or an
indictment charges harassment in the second degree, as defined in
section 240.26 of the penal law, if there is a judgment of conviction
for such offense and such offense is determined to have been committed
against a member of the same family or household as the defendant, as
defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter, the record
of such conviction shall be accessible for law enforcement purposes and
not sealed, as specified in paragraph (a) and subparagraph (vi) of
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section 160.55 of this title; and
5. In any case in which a defendant has appeared for arraignment in
response to a summons or an appearance ticket, a printed statement upon
such process of any court instruction required by the provisions of
subdivision four, other than those specified in paragraphs (d) and (e)
thereof, constitutes compliance with such provisions with respect to the
instruction so printed.
6. If a defendant charged with a traffic infraction or infractions
only desires to proceed without the aid of counsel, the court must
permit him to do so. In all other cases, the court must permit the
defendant to proceed without the aid of counsel if it is satisfied that
he made such decision with knowledge of the significance thereof, but if
it is not so satisfied it may not proceed until the defendant is
provided with counsel, either of his own choosing or by assignment.
Regardless of the kind or nature of the charges, a defendant who
proceeds at the arraignment without counsel does not waive his right to
counsel, and the court must inform him that he continues to have such
right as well as all the rights specified in subdivision three which are
necessary to effectuate it, and that he may exercise such rights at any
stage of the action.
7. Upon the arraignment, the court, unless it intends to make a final
disposition of the action immediately thereafter, must, as provided in
subdivision one of section 530.20, issue a securing order either
releasing the defendant on his own recognizance or fixing bail for his
future appearance in the action; except that where a defendant appears
by counsel pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision one of this section,
the court must release the defendant on his own recognizance.
8. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a local
criminal court may not, at arraignment or within thirty days of
arraignment on a simplified traffic information charging a violation of
subdivision two, two-a, three, four or four-a of section eleven hundred
ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law and upon which a notation has
been made pursuant to subdivision twelve of section eleven hundred
ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, accept a plea of guilty to a
violation of any subdivision of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the
vehicle and traffic law, nor to any other traffic infraction arising out
of the same incident, nor to any other traffic infraction, violation or
misdemeanor where the court is aware that such offense was charged
pursuant to an accident involving death or serious physical injury,
except upon written consent of the district attorney.
8-a. (a) Where an information, a simplified information, a
prosecutor's information, a misdemeanor complaint, a felony complaint or
an indictment charges harassment in the second degree as defined in
section 240.26 of the penal law, the people may serve upon the defendant
and file with the court a notice alleging that such offense was
committed against a member of the same family or household as the
defendant, as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter. Such notice must be served within fifteen days after
arraignment on an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information, a misdemeanor complaint, a felony complaint or an
indictment for such charge and before trial. Such notice must include
the name of the person alleged to be a member of the same family or
household as the defendant and specify the specific family or household
relationship as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter.
(b) If a defendant, charged with harassment in the second degree as
defined in section 240.26 of the penal law stipulates, or admits in the
course of a plea disposition, that the person against whom the charged
offense is alleged to have been committed is a member of the same family
or household as the defendant, as defined in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this chapter, such allegation shall be deemed established for
purposes of paragraph (a) and subparagraph (vi) of paragraph (d) of
subdivision one of section 160.55 of this title. If the defendant denies
such allegation, the people may, by proof beyond a reasonable doubt,
prove as part of their case that the alleged victim of such offense was
a member of the same family or household as the defendant. In such
circumstances, the trier of fact shall make its determination with
respect to such allegation orally on the record or in writing.
9. Nothing contained in this section applies to the arraignment of
corporate defendants, which is governed generally by the provisions of
article six hundred.
10. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this section, when an
off-hours arraignment part designated in accordance with paragraph (w)
of subdivision one of section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law is
in operation in the county in which the court is located, the court must
adjourn the proceedings before it, and direct that the proceedings be
continued in such off-hours part when the defendant has appeared before
the court without counsel and no counsel is otherwise available at the
time of such appearance to aid the defendant, unless the defendant
desires to proceed without the aid of counsel and the court is
satisfied, pursuant to subdivision six of this section, that the
defendant made such decision with knowledge of the significance thereof.
Removal of action from one local criminal court to another.
Under circumstances prescribed in this section, a criminal action
based upon an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint may be removed from one local
criminal court to another:
1. When a defendant arrested by a police officer for an offense other
than a felony, allegedly committed in a city or town, has, owing to
special circumstances and pursuant to law, not been brought before the
particular local criminal court which by reason of the situs of such
offense has trial jurisdiction thereof, but, instead, before a local
criminal court which does not have trial jurisdiction thereof, and
therein stands charged with such offense by information, simplified
information or misdemeanor complaint, such local criminal court must
arraign him upon such accusatory instrument. If the defendant desires
to enter a plea of guilty thereto immediately following such
arraignment, such local criminal court must permit him to do so and must
thereafter conduct the action to judgment. Otherwise, it must remit the
action, together with all pertinent papers and documents, to the local
criminal court which has trial jurisdiction of the action, and the
latter court must then conduct such action to judgment or other final
disposition.
2. When a defendant arrested by a police officer for an offense other
than a felony has been brought before a superior court judge sitting as
a local criminal court for arraignment upon an information, simplified
information or misdemeanor complaint charging such offense, such judge
must, as a local criminal court, arraign the defendant upon such
accusatory instrument. Such judge must then remit the action, together
with all pertinent papers and documents, to a local criminal court
having trial jurisdiction thereof. The latter court must then conduct
such action to judgment or other final disposition.
3. At any time within the period provided by section 255.20, where a
defendant is arraigned upon an information, a simplified information, a
prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint pending in a city
court, town court or a village court having trial jurisdiction thereof,
a judge of the county court of the county in which such city court, town
court or village court is located may, upon motion of the defendant or
the people, order that the action be transferred for disposition from
the court in which the matter is pending to another designated local
criminal court of the county, upon the ground that disposition thereof
within a reasonable time in the court from which removal is sought is
unlikely owing to:
(a) Death, disability or other incapacity or disqualification of all
of the judges of such court; or
(b) Inability of such court to form a jury in a case, in which the
defendant is entitled to and has requested a jury trial.
4. Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, in
any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,
upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an information, a simplified
information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint
pending in a local criminal court, such court may, upon motion of the
defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be
heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the
matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county
which has been designated a court formed to address a matter of special
concern based upon the status of the defendant or the victim, commonly
known as a "problem solving court," including, but not limited to, drug
court, domestic violence court, youth court, mental health court, and
veterans court, by the chief administrator of the courts, and such
problem solving court may then conduct such action to judgment or other
final disposition; provided, however, that an order of removal issued
under this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the
date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the
problem solving court notifies the court that issued the order that:
(a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not
take effect, or
(b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date.
Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this
subdivision, the problem solving court shall promptly give notice to the
defendant, his or her counsel and the district attorney.
5. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary,
in any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,
upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an information, a simplified
information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint
pending in a local criminal court, such court may, upon motion of the
defendant and after giving the district attorney an opportunity to be
heard, order that the action be removed from the court in which the
matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same county, or
with consent of the district attorney and the district attorney of the
adjoining county to another court in such adjoining county, that has
been designated as a human trafficking court or veterans treatment court
by the chief administrator of the courts, and such human trafficking
court or veterans treatment court may then conduct such action to
judgment or other final deposition; provided, however, that no court may
order removal pursuant to this subdivision to a veterans treatment court
of a family offense charge described in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person alleged to be
the victim of such offense charged are members of the same family or
household as defined in such subdivision one of section 530.11; and
provided further that an order of removal issued under this subdivision
shall not take effect until five days after the date the order is issued
unless, prior to such effective date, the human trafficking court or
veterans treatment court notifies the court that issued the order that:
i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not
take effect; or
ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date.
(b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of
paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or
veterans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant,
his or her counsel, and the district attorney.
Divestiture of jurisdiction by indictment; removal of case to
superior court at district attorney's instance.
1. If at any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement
of a trial of a local criminal court accusatory instrument containing a
charge of misdemeanor, an indictment charging the defendant with such
misdemeanor is filed in a superior court, the local criminal court is
thereby divested of jurisdiction of such misdemeanor charge and all
proceedings therein with respect thereto are terminated.
2. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of
a trial of an accusatory instrument specified in subdivision one, the
district attorney may apply for an adjournment of the proceedings in the
local criminal court upon the ground that he intends to present the
misdemeanor charge in question to a grand jury with a view to
prosecuting it by indictment in a superior court. In such case, the
local criminal court must adjourn the proceedings to a date which
affords the district attorney reasonable opportunity to pursue such
action, and may subsequently grant such further adjournments for that
purpose as are reasonable under the circumstances. Following the
granting of such adjournment or adjournments, the proceedings must be as
follows:
(a) If such charge is presented to a grand jury within the designated
period and either an indictment or a dismissal of such charge results,
the local criminal court is thereby divested of jurisdiction of such
charge, and all proceedings in the local criminal court with respect
thereto are terminated.
(b) If the misdemeanor charge is not presented to a grand jury within
the designated period, the proceedings in the local criminal court must
continue.
Divestiture of jurisdiction by indictment; removal of case to
superior court at defendant's instance.
1. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of
a trial of a local criminal court accusatory instrument containing a
charge of misdemeanor, a superior court having jurisdiction to prosecute
such misdemeanor charge by indictment may, upon motion of the defendant
made upon notice to the district attorney, showing good cause to believe
that the interests of justice so require, order that such charge be
prosecuted by indictment and that the district attorney present it to
the grand jury for such purpose.
2. Such order stays the proceedings in the local criminal court
pending submission of the charge to the grand jury. Upon the subsequent
filing of an indictment in the superior court, the proceedings in the
local criminal court terminate and the defendant must be required to
appear for arraignment upon the indictment in the manner prescribed in
subdivisions one and two of section 210.10. Upon the subsequent filing
of a grand jury dismissal of the charge, the proceedings in the local
criminal court terminate and the superior court must, if the defendant
is not at liberty on his own recognizance, discharge him from custody or
exonerate his bail, as the case may be.
3. At any time before entry of a plea of guilty to or commencement of
a trial of or within thirty days of arraignment on an accusatory
instrument specified in subdivision one, whichever occurs first, the
defendant may apply to the local criminal court for an adjournment of
the proceedings therein upon the ground that he intends to make a motion
in a superior court, pursuant to subdivision one, for an order that the
misdemeanor charge be prosecuted by indictment. In such case, the local
criminal court must adjourn the proceedings to a date which affords the
defendant reasonable opportunity to pursue such action, and may
subsequently grant such further adjournments for that purpose as are
reasonable under the circumstances. Following the granting of such
adjournment or adjournments, the proceedings must be as follows:
(a) If a motion in a superior court is not made by the defendant
within the designated period, the proceedings in the local criminal
court must continue.
(b) If a motion in a superior court is made by the defendant within
the designated period, such motion stays the proceedings in the local
criminal court until the entry of an order determining such motion.
(c) If the superior court enters an order granting the motion, such
order stays the proceedings in the local criminal court as provided in
subdivision two; and upon a subsequent indictment or dismissal of such
charge by the grand jury, the proceedings in the local criminal court
terminate as provided in subdivision two.
(d) If the superior court enters an order denying the motion, the
proceedings in the local criminal court must continue.
4. Upon application of a defendant who on the basis of an order
issued by a superior court pursuant to subdivision one is awaiting grand
jury action, and who, at the time of such order or subsequent thereto,
has been committed to the custody of the sheriff pending grand jury
action, and who has been confined in such custody for a period of more
than forty-five days without the occurrence of any grand jury action or
disposition, the superior court which issued such order must release him
on his own recognizance unless:
(a) The lack of a grand jury disposition during such period of
confinement was due to the defendant's request, action or condition, or
occurred with his consent; or
(b) The people have shown good cause why such order of release should
not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some compelling fact or
circumstance which precluded grand jury action within the prescribed
period or rendered the same against the interest of justice.
Motion to dismiss information, simplified information,
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint.
1. After arraignment upon an information, a simplified information, a
prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint, the local criminal
court may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such instrument or any
count thereof upon the ground that:
(a) It is defective, within the meaning of section 170.35; or
(b) The defendant has received immunity from prosecution for the
offense charged, pursuant to sections 50.20 or 190.40; or
(c) The prosecution is barred by reason of a previous prosecution,
pursuant to section 40.20; or
(d) The prosecution is untimely, pursuant to section 30.10; or
(e) The defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial; or
(f) There exists some other jurisdictional or legal impediment to
conviction of the defendant for the offense charged; or
(g) Dismissal is required in furtherance of justice, within the
meaning of section 170.40.
2. A motion pursuant to this section, except a motion pursuant to
paragraph (e) of subdivision one, should be made within the period
provided by section 255.20. A motion made pursuant to paragraph (e) of
subdivision one should be made prior to the commencement of trial or
entry of a plea of guilty.
3. Upon the motion, a defendant who is in a position adequately to
raise more than one ground in support thereof should raise every such
ground upon which he intends to challenge the accusatory instrument. A
subsequent motion based upon such a ground not so raised may be
summarily denied, although the court, in the interest of justice and for
good cause shown, may in its discretion entertain and dispose of such a
motion on the merits notwithstanding.
4. After arraignment upon an information, a simplified information, a
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint on a charge of
prostitution pursuant to section 230.00 of the penal law the local
criminal court may dismiss such charge in its discretion in the interest
of justice on the ground that a defendant participated in services
provided to him or her.
Motion to dismiss information, simplified information,
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint; as defective.
1. An information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint, or a count thereof, is defective
within the meaning of paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 170.30
when:
(a) It is not sufficient on its face pursuant to the requirements of
section 100.40; provided that such an instrument or count may not be
dismissed as defective, but must instead be amended, where the defect or
irregularity is of a kind that may be cured by amendment and where the
people move to so amend; or
(b) The allegations demonstrate that the court does not have
jurisdiction of the offense charged; or
(c) The statute defining the offense charged is unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid.
2. An information is also defective when it is filed in replacement
of a misdemeanor complaint pursuant to section 170.65 but without
satisfying the requirements stated therein.
3. A prosecutor's information is also defective when:
(a) It is filed at the direction of a grand jury, pursuant to section
190.70, and the offense or offenses charged are not among those
authorized by such grand jury direction; or
(b) It is filed by the district attorney at his own instance,
pursuant to subdivision two of section 100.50, and the factual
allegations of the original information underlying it and any supporting
depositions are not legally sufficient to support the charge in the
prosecutor's information.
Motion to dismiss information, simplified traffic information,
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint; in
furtherance of justice.
1. An information, a simplified traffic information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint, or any count thereof, may be
dismissed in the interest of justice, as provided in paragraph (g) of
subdivision one of section 170.30 when, even though there may be no
basis for dismissal as a matter of law upon any ground specified in
paragraphs (a) through (f) of said subdivision one of section 170.30,
such dismissal is required as a matter of judicial discretion by the
existence of some compelling factor, consideration or circumstance
clearly demonstrating that conviction or prosecution of the defendant
upon such accusatory instrument or count would constitute or result in
injustice. In determining whether such compelling factor, consideration,
or circumstance exists, the court must, to the extent applicable,
examine and consider, individually and collectively, the following:
(a) the seriousness and circumstances of the offense;
(b) the extent of harm caused by the offense;
(c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at
trial;
(d) the history, character and condition of the defendant;
(e) any exceptionally serious misconduct of law enforcement personnel
in the investigation, arrest and prosecution of the defendant;
(f) the purpose and effect of imposing upon the defendant a sentence
authorized for the offense;
(g) the impact of a dismissal on the safety or welfare of the
community;
(h) the impact of a dismissal upon the confidence of the public in
the criminal justice system;
(i) where the court deems it appropriate, the attitude of the
complainant or victim with respect to the motion;
(j) any other relevant fact indicating that a judgment of conviction
would serve no useful purpose.
2. An order dismissing an accusatory instrument specified in
subdivision one in the interest of justice may be issued upon motion of
the people or of the court itself as well as upon that of the defendant.
Upon issuing such an order, the court must set forth its reasons
therefor upon the record.
Motion to dismiss information, simplified traffic information,
prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint;
procedure.
The procedural rules prescribed in section 210.45 with respect to the
making, consideration and disposition of a motion to dismiss an
indictment are also applicable to a motion to dismiss an information, a
simplified traffic information, a prosecutor's information or a
misdemeanor complaint.
Motion in superior court to dismiss prosecutor's information.
1. At any time after arraignment in a local criminal court upon a
prosecutor's information filed at the direction of a grand jury and
before entry of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a trial
thereof, the local criminal court wherein the prosecutor's information
is filed may, upon motion of the defendant, dismiss such prosecutor's
information or a count thereof upon the ground that:
(a) The evidence before the grand jury was not legally sufficient to
support the charge; or
(b) The grand jury proceeding resulting in the filing of such
prosecutor's information was defective.
2. The criteria and procedures for consideration and disposition of
such motion are the same as those prescribed in sections 210.30 and
210.35, governing consideration and disposition of a motion to dismiss
an indictment on the ground of insufficiency of grand jury evidence or
of a defective grand jury proceeding; and, where appropriate, the
general procedural rules prescribed in section 210.45 for consideration
and disposition of a motion to dismiss an indictment are also
applicable.
3. Upon dismissing a prosecutor's information or a count thereof
pursuant to this section, the court may, upon application of the people,
in its discretion authorize the people to resubmit the charge or charges
to the same or another grand jury. In the absence of such
authorization, such charge or charges may not be resubmitted to a grand
jury. The rules prescribed in subdivisions eight and nine of section
210.45 concerning the discharge of a defendant from custody or
exoneration of bail in the absence of an authorization to resubmit an
indictment to a grand jury, and concerning the issuance of a securing
order and the effective period thereof where such an authorization is
issued, apply equally where a prosecutor's information is dismissed
pursuant to this section.
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.
1. Upon or after arraignment in a local criminal court upon an
information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's information or a
misdemeanor complaint, and before entry of a plea of guilty thereto or
commencement of a trial thereof, the court may, upon motion of the
people or the defendant and with the consent of the other party, or upon
the court's own motion with the consent of both the people and the
defendant, order that the action be "adjourned in contemplation of
dismissal," as prescribed in subdivision two.
2. An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal is an adjournment of
the action without date ordered with a view to ultimate dismissal of the
accusatory instrument in furtherance of justice. Upon issuing such an
order, the court must release the defendant on his own recognizance.
Upon application of the people, made at any time not more than six
months, or in the case of a family offense as defined in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of this chapter, one year, after the issuance of such
order, the court may restore the case to the calendar upon a
determination that dismissal of the accusatory instrument would not be
in furtherance of justice, and the action must thereupon proceed. If the
case is not so restored within such six months or one year period, the
accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such period, deemed to
have been dismissed by the court in furtherance of justice.
3. In conjunction with an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal
the court may issue a temporary order of protection pursuant to section
530.12 or 530.13 of this chapter, requiring the defendant to observe
certain specified conditions of conduct.
4. Where the local criminal court information, simplified information,
prosecutor's information, or misdemeanor complaint charges a crime or
violation between spouses or between parent and child, or between
members of the same family or household, as the term "members of the
same family or household" is defined in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this chapter, the court may as a condition of an adjournment
in contemplation of dismissal order, require that the defendant
participate in an educational program addressing the issues of spousal
abuse and family violence.
5. The court may grant an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal on
condition that the defendant participate in dispute resolution and
comply with any award or settlement resulting therefrom.
6. The court may as a condition of an adjournment in contemplation of
dismissal order, require the defendant to perform services for a public
or not-for-profit corporation, association, institution or agency. Such
condition may only be imposed where the defendant has consented to the
amount and conditions of such service. The court may not impose such
conditions in excess of the length of the adjournment.
6-a. The court may, as a condition of an authorized adjournment in
contemplation of dismissal, where the defendant has been charged with an
offense and the elements of such offense meet the criteria of an
"eligible offense" and such person qualified as an "eligible person" as
such terms are defined in section four hundred fifty-eight-l of the
social services law, require the defendant to participate in an
education reform program in accordance with section four hundred
fifty-eight-l of the social services law.
7. The court may, as a condition of an adjournment in contemplation of
dismissal order, where a defendant is under twenty-one years of age and
is charged with (a) a misdemeanor or misdemeanors other than section
eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, in which the
record indicates the consumption of alcohol by the defendant may have
been a contributing factor, or (b) a violation of paragraph (a) of
subdivision one of section sixty-five-b of the alcoholic beverage
control law, require the defendant to attend an alcohol awareness
program established pursuant to subdivision (a) of section 19.07 of the
mental hygiene law.
8. The granting of an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal shall
not be deemed to be a conviction or an admission of guilt. No person
shall suffer any disability or forfeiture as a result of such an order.
Upon the dismissal of the accusatory instrument pursuant to this
section, the arrest and prosecution shall be deemed a nullity and the
defendant shall be restored, in contemplation of law, to the status he
occupied before his arrest and prosecution.
9. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a court may
not issue an order adjourning an action in contemplation of dismissal if
the offense is for a violation of the vehicle and traffic law related to
the operation of a motor vehicle (except one related to parking,
stopping or standing), or a violation of a local law, rule or ordinance
related to the operation of a motor vehicle (except one related to
parking, stopping or standing), if such offense was committed by the
holder of a commercial learner's permit or a commercial driver's license
or was committed in a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in
subdivision four of section five hundred one-a of the vehicle and
traffic law.
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in cases involving
marihuana.
1. Upon or after arraignment in a local criminal court upon an
information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint,
where the sole remaining count or counts charge a violation or
violations of section 222.10, 222.15, 222.25, 222.30, 222.45 or 222.50
of the penal law, or upon summons for a nuisance offense under section
sixty-five-c of the alcoholic beverage control law and before the entry
of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a trial thereof, the
court, upon motion of a defendant, may order that all proceedings be
suspended and the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, or
upon a finding that adjournment would not be necessary or appropriate
and the setting forth in the record of the reasons for such findings,
may dismiss in furtherance of justice the accusatory instrument;
provided, however, that the court may not order such adjournment in
contemplation of dismissal or dismiss the accusatory instrument if: (a)
the defendant has previously been granted such adjournment in
contemplation of dismissal, or (b) the defendant has previously been
granted a dismissal under this section, or (c) the defendant has
previously been convicted of any offense involving controlled
substances, or (d) the defendant has previously been convicted of a
crime and the district attorney does not consent or (e) the defendant
has previously been adjudicated a youthful offender on the basis of any
act or acts involving controlled substances and the district attorney
does not consent. Notwithstanding the limitations set forth in this
subdivision, the court may order that all proceedings be suspended and
the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal based upon a finding
of exceptional circumstances. For purposes of this subdivision,
exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of the ultimate
disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is likely to
result in severe or ongoing consequences, including, but not limited to,
potential or actual immigration consequences.
2. Upon ordering the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal,
the court must set and specify such conditions for the adjournment as
may be appropriate, and such conditions may include placing the
defendant under the supervision of any public or private agency. At any
time prior to dismissal the court may modify the conditions or extend or
reduce the term of the adjournment, except that the total period of
adjournment shall not exceed twelve months. Upon violation of any
condition fixed by the court, the court may revoke its order and restore
the case to the calendar and the prosecution thereupon must proceed. If
the case is not so restored to the calendar during the period fixed by
the court, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such
period, deemed to have been dismissed in the furtherance of justice.
3. Upon or after dismissal of such charges against a defendant not
previously convicted of a crime, the court shall order that all official
records and papers, relating to the defendant's arrest and prosecution,
whether on file with the court, a police agency, or the New York state
division of criminal justice services, be sealed and, except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section 160.50
of this chapter, not made available to any person or public or private
agency; except, such records shall be made available under order of a
court for the purpose of determining whether, in subsequent proceedings,
such person qualifies under this section for a dismissal or adjournment
in contemplation of dismissal of the accusatory instrument.
4. Upon the granting of an order pursuant to subdivision three, the
arrest and prosecution shall be deemed a nullity and the defendant shall
be restored, in contemplation of law, to the status he occupied before
his arrest and prosecution.
Requirement of plea to information, simplified information or
prosecutor's information.
Unless an information, a simplified information or a prosecutor's
information is dismissed or the criminal action thereon terminated or
abated pursuant to a provision of this article or some other provision
of law, the defendant must be required to enter a plea thereto.
Replacement of misdemeanor complaint by information and waiver
thereof.
1. A defendant against whom a misdemeanor complaint is pending is not
required to enter a plea thereto. For purposes of prosecution, such
instrument must, except as provided in subdivision three, be replaced by
an information, and the defendant must be arraigned thereon. If the
misdemeanor complaint is supplemented by a supporting deposition and
such instruments taken together satisfy the requirements for a valid
information, such misdemeanor complaint is deemed to have been converted
to and to constitute a replacing information.
2. An information which replaces a misdemeanor complaint need not
charge the same offense or offenses, but at least one count thereof must
charge the commission by the defendant of an offense based upon conduct
which was the subject of the misdemeanor complaint. In addition, the
information may, subject to the rules of joinder, charge any other
offense which the factual allegations thereof or of any supporting
depositions accompanying it are legally sufficient to support, even
though such offense is not based upon conduct which was the subject of
the misdemeanor complaint.
3. A defendant who has been arraigned upon a misdemeanor complaint
may waive prosecution by information and consent to be prosecuted upon
the misdemeanor complaint. In such case, the defendant must be
required, either upon the date of the waiver or subsequent thereto, to
enter a plea to the misdemeanor complaint.
Release of defendant upon failure to replace misdemeanor
complaint by information.
Upon application of a defendant against whom a misdemeanor complaint
is pending in a local criminal court, and who, either at the time of his
arraignment thereon or subsequent thereto, has been committed to the
custody of the sheriff pending disposition of the action, and who has
been confined in such custody for a period of more than five days, not
including Sunday, without any information having been filed in
replacement of such misdemeanor complaint, the criminal court must
release the defendant on his own recognizance unless:
1. The defendant has waived prosecution by information and consented
to be prosecuted upon the misdemeanor complaint, pursuant to subdivision
three of section 170.65; or
2. The court is satisfied that there is good cause why such order of
release should not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some
compelling fact or circumstance which precluded replacement of the
misdemeanor complaint by an information or a prosecutor's information
within the prescribed period.
Proceedings regarding certain prostitution charges; certain
persons aged sixteen or seventeen.
1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, at any time at or after
arraignment on a charge of prostitution pursuant to section 230.00 of
the penal law, after consultation with counsel, a knowing and voluntary
plea of guilty has been entered to such charge, any judge or justice
hearing any stage of such case may, upon consent of the defendant after
consultation with counsel:
(a) conditionally convert such charge in accordance with subdivision
three of this section and retain it as a person in need of supervision
proceeding for all purposes, and shall make such proceeding fully
subject to the provisions and grant any relief available under article
seven of the family court act; and/or
(b) order the provision of any of the specialized services enumerated
in title eight-A of article six of the social services law, as may be
reasonably available.
2. In the event of a conviction by plea or verdict to such charge or
charges of prostitution or loitering for the purposes of prostitution as
described in subdivision one of this section, the court must find that
the person is a youthful offender for the purpose of such charge and
proceed in accordance with article seven hundred twenty of this chapter,
provided, however, that the available sentence shall be the sentence
that may be imposed for a violation as defined in subdivision three of
section 10.00 of the penal law. In such case, the records of the
investigation and proceedings relating to such charge shall be sealed in
accordance with section 720.35 of this chapter.
3. (a) When a charge of prostitution or loitering for the purposes of
prostitution has been conditionally converted to a person in need of
supervision proceeding pursuant to subdivision one of this section, the
defendant shall be deemed a "sexually exploited child" as defined in
subdivision one of section four hundred forty-seven-a of the social
services law and therefore shall not be considered an adult for purposes
related to the charges in the person in need of supervision proceeding.
Sections seven hundred eighty-one, seven hundred eighty-two, seven
hundred eighty-two-a, seven hundred eighty-three and seven hundred
eighty-four of the family court act shall apply to any proceeding
conditionally converted under this section.
(b) The court after hearing from the parties shall state the condition
or conditions of such conversion, which may include the individual's
participation in specialized services provided pursuant to title eight-A
of article six of the social services law and other appropriate services
available to persons in need of supervision in accordance with article
seven of the family court act.
(c)(i) The court may, upon written application by the people at any
time during the pendency of the person in need of supervision proceeding
or during any disposition thereof, but in no event later than the
individual's eighteenth birthday, restore the accusatory instrument if
the court is satisfied by competent proof that the individual, without
just cause, is not in substantial compliance with the condition or
conditions of the conversion.
(ii) Notice of such an application to restore an accusatory instrument
shall be served on the person and his or her counsel by the court. The
notice shall include a statement setting forth a reasonable description
of why the person is not in substantial compliance with the condition or
conditions of the conversion and a date upon which such person shall
appear before the court. The court shall afford the person the right to
counsel and the right to be heard. Upon such appearance, the court must
advise the person of the contents of the notice and the consequences of
a finding of failure to substantially comply with the conditions of
conversion. At the time of such appearance the court must ask the person
whether he or she wishes to make any statement with respect to such
alleged failure to substantially comply. In determining whether such
person has failed to substantially comply with the terms of the
conversion, the court shall conduct a hearing at which time such person
may cross-examine witnesses and present evidence on his or her own
behalf. Any findings the court shall make, shall be made on the court
record. If the court finds that such person did not substantially
comply, it may restore the accusatory instrument pursuant to
subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, modify the terms of conversion in
accordance with this section or otherwise continue such terms as in its
discretion it deems just and proper.
(iii) If such accusatory instrument is restored pursuant to
subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, the proceeding shall continue in
accordance with subdivision two of this section. If the individual does
not comply with services or does not return to court, the individual
shall be returned in accordance with the provisions of article seven of
the family court act.
4. At the conclusion of a person in need of supervision proceeding
pursuant to this section, all records of the investigation and
proceedings relating to such proceedings, including records created
before the charge was conditionally converted, shall be sealed in
accordance with section 720.35 of this chapter.
ARTICLE 180 Proceedings Upon Felony Complaint From Arraignment Thereon Through Disposition Thereof
Proceedings upon felony complaint; arraignment; defendant's
rights, court's instructions and bail matters.
1. Upon the defendant's arraignment before a local criminal court upon
a felony complaint, the court must immediately inform him, or cause him
to be informed in its presence, of the charge or charges against him and
that the primary purpose of the proceedings upon such felony complaint
is to determine whether the defendant is to be held for the action of a
grand jury with respect to the charges contained therein. The court must
furnish the defendant with a copy of the felony complaint.
2. The defendant has a right to a prompt hearing upon the issue of
whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant the court in holding him
for the action of a grand jury, but he may waive such right.
3. The defendant has a right to the aid of counsel at the arraignment
and at every subsequent stage of the action, and, if he appears upon
such arraignment without counsel, has the following rights:
(a) To an adjournment for the purpose of obtaining counsel; and
(b) To communicate, free of charge, by letter or by telephone provided
by the law enforcement facility where the defendant is held to a phone
number located in the United States or Puerto Rico, for the purpose of
obtaining counsel and informing a relative or friend that he or she has
been charged with an offense; and
(c) To have counsel assigned by the court in any case where he is
financially unable to obtain the same.
4. The court must inform the defendant of all rights specified in
subdivisions two and three. The court must accord the defendant
opportunity to exercise such rights and must itself take such
affirmative action as is necessary to effectuate them.
5. If the defendant desires to proceed without the aid of counsel, the
court must permit him to do so if it is satisfied that he made such
decision with knowledge of the significance thereof, but if it is not so
satisfied it may not proceed until the defendant is provided with
counsel, either of his own choosing or by assignment. A defendant who
proceeds at the arraignment without counsel does not waive his right to
counsel, and the court must inform him that he continues to have such
right as well as all the rights specified in subdivision three which are
necessary to effectuate it, and that he may exercise such rights at any
stage of the action.
6. Upon the arraignment, the court, unless it intends immediately
thereafter to dismiss the felony complaint and terminate the action,
must issue a securing order which, as provided in subdivision two of
section 530.20, either releases the defendant on his own recognizance or
fixes bail or commits him to the custody of the sheriff for his future
appearance in such action.
7. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this section, when an
off-hours arraignment part designated in accordance with paragraph (w)
of subdivision one of section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law is
in operation in the county in which the court is located, the court must
adjourn the proceedings before it, and direct that the proceedings be
continued in such off-hours part when the defendant has appeared before
the court without counsel and no counsel is otherwise available at the
time of such appearance to aid the defendant.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; removal of action from one
local criminal court to another.
Under circumstances prescribed in this section, a criminal action
based upon a pending felony complaint may be removed from one local
criminal court to another:
1. When a defendant arrested by a police officer for a felony
allegedly committed in a town has not been brought before the town court
of the town, or as the case may be before the village court of the
village, in which the felony charged was allegedly committed, but,
instead, to another local criminal court of the county and there stands
charged with such offense by felony complaint, such latter court must
arraign him upon such felony complaint. Such court must then either:
(a) Dispose of the felony complaint pursuant to this article. If
such disposition results in a reduction of the felony charge and the
filing of an information or prosecutor's information charging a
misdemeanor or a petty offense pursuant to section 180.50 or subdivision
two or three of section 180.70, such court must conduct the action to
judgment or other final disposition; or
(b) Remit the action upon the felony complaint, together with all
pertinent papers and documents, to the town court of the town, or as the
case may be to the village court of the village, in which the felony
charged was allegedly committed. In such case, the latter court must
dispose of the felony complaint pursuant to this article.
1-a. When a defendant arrested by a police officer for a felony
allegedly committed in a city has not been brought before the city court
of such city but, instead, to the local criminal court of an adjoining
town or village of the same county and there stands charged with such
offense by felony complaint, such latter court must arraign him upon
such felony complaint. Such court must then either:
(a) Dispose of the felony complaint pursuant to this article. If such
disposition results in a reduction of the felony charge and the filing
of an information or prosecutor's information charging a misdemeanor or
a petty offense pursuant to section 180.50 or subdivision two or three
of section 180.70 of this article, such court must conduct the action to
judgment or other final disposition; or
(b) Remit the action upon the felony complaint, together with all
pertinent papers and documents, to the city court of the city in which
the felony charged was allegedly committed. In such case, the latter
court must dispose of the felony complaint pursuant to this article.
2. When a defendant arrested by a police officer for a felony has
been brought before a superior court judge sitting as a local criminal
court for arraignment upon a felony complaint charging such felony, such
judge must, as a local criminal court, arraign the defendant upon such
felony complaint. Such court must then either:
(a) Dispose of the felony complaint pursuant to this article. If
however, such disposition results in a reduction of the charge and the
filing of an information or prosecutor's information charging a
misdemeanor or a petty offense, such judge, after arraigning the
defendant upon such accusatory instrument, must remit the action,
together with all pertinent papers and documents, to a local criminal
court having trial jurisdiction of the offense charged, and the latter
court must then conduct the action to judgment or other final
disposition; or
(b) Remit the action upon the felony complaint, together with all
pertinent papers and documents, to a local criminal court having
geographical jurisdiction over the area in which the felony charged was
allegedly committed. In such case, such latter court must dispose of
the felony complaint pursuant to this article.
3. Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary, in
any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,
upon or after arraignment of a defendant on a felony complaint pending
in a local criminal court having preliminary jurisdiction thereof, such
court may, upon motion of the defendant and with the consent of the
district attorney, order that the action be removed from the court in
which the matter is pending to another local criminal court in the same
county which has been designated a drug court by the chief administrator
of the courts, and such drug court may then dispose of such felony
complaint pursuant to this article; provided, however, that an order of
removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five
days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective
date, the drug court notifies the court that issued the order that:
(a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not
take effect, or
(b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date.
Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this
subdivision, the drug court shall promptly give notice to the defendant,
his or her counsel and the district attorney.
4. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary,
in any county outside a city having a population of one million or more,
upon or after arraignment of a defendant on a felony complaint pending
in a local criminal court having preliminary jurisdiction thereof, such
court may, upon motion of the defendant and after giving the district
attorney an opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed
from the court in which the matter is pending to another local criminal
court in the same county, or with consent of the district attorney and
the district attorney of the adjoining county to another court in such
adjoining county, that has been designated as a human trafficking court
or veterans treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts,
and such human trafficking court or veterans treatment court may then
conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition; provided,
however, that no court may order removal pursuant to this subdivision to
a veterans treatment court of a family offense charge described in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and
the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members
of the same family or household as defined in such subdivision one of
section 530.11; and provided further an order of removal issued under
this subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date
the order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human
trafficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that
issued the order that:
i. it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not
take effect; or
ii. it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date.
(b) Upon providing notification pursuant to subparagraph i or ii of
paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the human trafficking court or
veterans treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant,
his or her counsel and the district attorney.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; waiver of hearing; action to
be taken.
If the defendant waives a hearing upon the felony complaint, the court
must either:
1. Order that the defendant be held for the action of a grand jury of
the appropriate superior court with respect to the charge or charges
contained in the felony complaint. In such case, the court must
promptly transmit to such superior court the order, the felony
complaint, the supporting depositions and all other pertinent documents.
Until such papers are received by the superior court, the action is
deemed to be still pending in the local criminal court; or
2. Make inquiry, pursuant to section 180.50, for the purpose of
determining whether the felony complaint should be dismissed and an
information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint filed
with the court in lieu thereof.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; application in superior
court following hearing or waiver of hearing.
Where the local criminal court has held a defendant for the action of
a grand jury, the district attorney may, at any time before such matter
is submitted to the grand jury, apply, ex parte, to the appropriate
superior court for an order directing that the felony complaint and
other papers transmitted to such court pursuant to subdivision one of
section 180.30 be returned to the local criminal court for
reconsideration of the action to be taken. The superior court may issue
such an order if it is satisfied that the felony complaint is defective
or that such action is required in the interest of justice.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; reduction of charge.
1. Whether or not the defendant waives a hearing upon the felony
complaint, the local criminal court may, upon consent of the district
attorney, make inquiry for the purpose of determining whether (a) the
available facts and evidence relating to the conduct underlying the
felony complaint provide a basis for charging the defendant with an
offense other than a felony, and (b) if so, whether the charge should,
in the manner prescribed in subdivision three, be reduced from one for a
felony to one for a non-felony offense. Upon such inquiry, the court
may question any person who it believes may possess information relevant
to the matter, including the defendant if he wishes to be questioned.
2. If after such inquiry the court is satisfied that there is
reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed an offense
other than a felony, it may order the indicated reduction as follows:
(a) If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony in addition to the non-felony offense in question,
the court may as a matter of right order a reduction of the charge to
one for the non-felony offense;
(b) If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony in addition to the non-felony offense, the court may
order a reduction of the charge to one for the non-felony offense only
if (i) it is satisfied that such reduction is in the interest of
justice, and (ii) the district attorney consents thereto; provided,
however, that the court may not order such reduction where there is
reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed a class A
felony, other than those defined in article two hundred twenty of the
penal law, or any armed felony as defined in subdivision forty-one of
section 1.20.
3. A charge is "reduced" from a felony to a non-felony offense,
within the meaning of this section, by replacing the felony complaint
with, or converting it to, another local criminal court accusatory
instrument, as follows:
(a) If the factual allegations of the felony complaint and/or any
supporting depositions are legally sufficient to support the charge that
the defendant committed the non-felony offense in question, the court
may:
(i) Direct the district attorney to file with the court a
prosecutor's information charging the defendant with such non-felony
offense; or
(ii) Request the complainant of the felony complaint to file with the
court an information charging the defendant with such non-felony
offense. If such an information is filed, any supporting deposition
supporting or accompanying the felony complaint is deemed also to
support or accompanying the replacing information; or
(iii) Convert the felony complaint, or a copy thereof, into an
information by notations upon or attached thereto which make the
necessary and appropriate changes in the title of the instrument and in
the names of the offense or offenses charged. In case of such
conversion, any supporting deposition supporting or accompanying the
felony complaint is deemed also to support or accompany the information
to which it has been converted;
(b) If the non-felony offense in question is a misdemeanor, and if
the factual allegations of the felony complaint together with those of
any supporting depositions, though providing reasonable cause to believe
that the defendant committed such misdemeanor are not legally sufficient
to support such misdemeanor charge, the court may cause such felony
complaint to be replaced by or converted to a misdemeanor complaint
charging the misdemeanor in question, in the manner prescribed in
subparagraphs two and three of paragraph (a) of this subdivision.
(c) An information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor
complaint filed pursuant to this section may, pursuant to the ordinary
rules of joinder, charge two or more offenses, and it may jointly charge
with each offense any two or more defendants originally so charged in
the felony complaint;
(d) Upon the filing of an information, a prosecutor's information or
a misdemeanor complaint pursuant to this section, the court must dismiss
the felony complaint from which such accusatory instrument is derived.
It must then arraign the defendant upon the new accusatory instrument
and inform him of his rights in connection therewith in the manner
provided in section 170.10.
4. Upon making any finding other than that specified in subdivision
two, the court must conduct a hearing upon the felony complaint, unless
the defendant has waived the same. In the case of such waiver the court
must order that the defendant be held for the action of a grand jury.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; the hearing; conduct
thereof.
A hearing upon a felony complaint must be conducted as follows:
1. The district attorney must conduct such hearing on behalf of the
people.
2. The defendant may as a matter of right be present at such hearing.
3. The court must read to the defendant the felony complaint and any
supporting depositions unless the defendant waives such reading.
4. Each witness, whether called by the people or by the defendant,
must, unless he would be authorized to give unsworn evidence at a trial,
testify under oath. Each witness, including any defendant testifying in
his own behalf, may be cross-examined.
5. The people must call and examine witnesses and offer evidence in
support of the charge.
6. The defendant may, as a matter of right, testify in his own
behalf.
7. Upon request of the defendant, the court may, as a matter of
discretion, permit him to call and examine other witnesses or to produce
other evidence in his behalf.
8. Upon such a hearing, only non-hearsay evidence is admissible to
demonstrate reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed a
felony; except that reports of experts and technicians in professional
and scientific fields and sworn statements of the kinds specified in
subdivisions two and three of section 190.30 are admissible to the same
extent as in a grand jury proceeding, unless the court determines, upon
application of the defendant, that such hearsay evidence is, under the
particular circumstances of the case, not sufficiently reliable, in
which case the court shall require that the witness testify in person
and be subject to cross-examination.
9. The court may, upon application of the defendant, exclude the
public from the hearing and direct that no disclosure be made of the
proceedings.
10. Such hearing should be completed at one session. In the interest
of justice, however, it may be adjourned by the court but, in the
absence of a showing of good cause therefor, no such adjournment may be
for more than one day.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; disposition of felony
complaint after hearing.
At the conclusion of a hearing, the court must dispose of the felony
complaint as follows:
1. If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony, the court must, except as provided in subdivision
three, order that the defendant be held for the action of a grand jury
of the appropriate superior court, and it must promptly transmit to such
superior court the order, the felony complaint, the supporting
depositions and all other pertinent documents. Until such papers are
received by the superior court, the action is deemed to be still pending
in the local criminal court.
2. If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony but there is reasonable cause to believe that he
committed an offense other than a felony, the court may, by means of
procedures prescribed in subdivision three of section 180.50, reduce the
charge to one for such non-felony offense.
3. If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony in addition to a non-felony offense, the court may,
instead of ordering the defendant held for the action of a grand jury as
provided in subdivision one, reduce the charge to one for such
non-felony offense as provided in subdivision two, if (a) it is
satisfied that such reduction is in the interest of justice, and (b) the
district attorney consents thereto; provided, however, that the court
may not order such reduction where there is reasonable cause to believe
the defendant committed a class A felony, other than those defined in
article two hundred twenty of the penal law, or any armed felony as
defined in subdivision forty-one of section 1.20.
4. If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed any offense, the court must dismiss the felony complaint and
discharge the defendant from custody if he is in custody, or, if he is
at liberty on bail, it must exonerate the bail.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; juvenile offender.
1. When a juvenile offender or adolescent offender is arraigned before
the youth part of a superior court or the most accessible magistrate
designated by the appellate division of the supreme court in the
applicable department to act as a youth part, the provisions of article
seven hundred twenty-two of this chapter shall apply in lieu of the
provisions of sections 180.30, 180.50 and 180.70 of this article.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; release of defendant from
custody upon failure of timely disposition.
Upon application of a defendant against whom a felony complaint has
been filed with a local criminal court or the youth part of a superior
court, and who, since the time of his arrest or subsequent thereto, has
been held in custody pending disposition of such felony complaint, and
who has been confined in such custody for a period of more than one
hundred twenty hours or, in the event that a Saturday, Sunday or legal
holiday occurs during such custody, one hundred forty-four hours,
without either a disposition of the felony complaint or commencement of
a hearing thereon, the court must release him on his own recognizance
unless:
1. The failure to dispose of the felony complaint or to commence a
hearing thereon during such period of confinement was due to the
defendant's request, action or condition, or occurred with his consent;
or
2. Prior to the application:
(a) The district attorney files with the court a written certification
that an indictment has been voted; or
(b) An indictment or a direction to file a prosecutor's information
charging an offense based upon conduct alleged in the felony complaint
was filed by a grand jury; or
3. The court is satisfied that the people have shown good cause why
such order of release should not be issued. Such good cause must consist
of some compelling fact or circumstance which precluded disposition of
the felony complaint within the prescribed period or rendered such
action against the interest of justice.
Termination of prosecution.
1. After arraignment of a defendant upon a felony complaint, other
than a felony complaint charging an offense defined in section 125.10,
125.15, 125.20, 125.25, 125.26 or 125.27 of the penal law, either party
or the local criminal court or superior court before which the action is
pending, on its own motion, may move in accordance with the provisions
of this section for an order terminating prosecution of the charges
contained in such felony complaint on consent of the parties.
2. A motion to terminate a prosecution pursuant to this section may
only be made where the count or counts of the felony complaint have not
been presented to a grand jury or otherwise disposed of in accordance
with this chapter. Such motion shall be filed in writing with the local
criminal court or superior court in which the felony complaint is
pending not earlier than twelve months following the date of arraignment
on such felony complaint. Upon the filing of such motion, the court
shall fix a return date and provide the parties with at least thirty
days' written notice of the motion and return date.
3. Where, upon motion to terminate a prosecution pursuant to this
section, both parties consent to such termination, the court, on the
return date of such motion, shall enter an order terminating such
prosecution. For purposes of this subdivision, a party that is given
written notice of a motion to terminate a prosecution shall be deemed to
consent to such termination unless, prior to the return date of such
motion, such party files a notice of opposition thereto with the court.
Except as otherwise provided in subdivision four, where such a notice of
opposition is filed, the court, on the return date of the motion, shall
enter an order denying the motion to terminate the prosecution.
4. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, where the
people file a notice of opposition pursuant to subdivision three, the
court, on the return date of the motion, may defer disposition of such
motion for a period of forty-five days. In such event, if the count or
counts of such felony complaint are presented to a grand jury or
otherwise disposed of within such period, the court, upon the expiration
thereof, shall enter an order denying the motion to terminate the
prosecution. If such count or counts are not presented to a grand jury
or otherwise disposed of within such period, the court, upon the
expiration thereof, shall enter an order terminating the prosecution
unless, within the forty-five day period, the people, on at least five
days' written notice to the defendant, show good cause for their failure
to present or otherwise dispose of such count or counts. If such good
cause is shown, the court, upon expiration of the forty-five day period,
shall enter an order denying the motion to terminate the prosecution.
5. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the defendant's
appearance in court on the return date of the motion or on any other
date shall not be required as a prerequisite to entry of an order under
this section.
6. The period from the filing of a motion pursuant to this section
until entry of an order disposing of such motion shall not, by reason of
such motion, be considered a period of delay for purposes of subdivision
four of section 30.30, nor shall such period, by reason of such motion,
be excluded in computing the time within which the people must be ready
for trial pursuant to such section 30.30.
7. Where a prosecution is terminated pursuant to this section, nothing
contained herein shall preclude the people from subsequently filing an
indictment charging the same count or counts provided such filing is in
accordance with the provisions of this section, article thirty and any
other relevant provisions of this chapter. Where the people indicate
their intention to seek an indictment following the entry of an order
terminating a prosecution pursuant to this section, the court shall,
notwithstanding any provision of section 160.50 to the contrary, stay
sealing under that section for a reasonable period not to exceed thirty
days to permit the people an opportunity to pursue such indictment.
8. Where an order denying a party's motion to terminate a prosecution
is entered pursuant to this section, such party may not file a
subsequent motion to terminate the prosecution pursuant to this section
for at least six months from the date on which such order is entered.
9. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, where a motion
to terminate a prosecution is filed with a local criminal court pursuant
to subdivision two, and, prior to the determination thereof, such court
is divested of jurisdiction by the filing of an indictment charging the
offense or offenses contained in the felony complaint, such motion shall
be deemed to have been denied as of the date of such divestiture.
10. The chief administrator of the courts, in consultation with the
director of the division of criminal justice services and
representatives of appropriate prosecutorial and criminal defense
organizations in the state, shall adopt forms for the motion to
terminate a prosecution authorized by subdivision one and for the notice
of opposition specified in subdivision three.
ARTICLE 182 Electronic Court Appearances
* § 182.10 Definition of terms.
"Electronic appearance" shall mean an appearance in which one or more
of the participants in the proceeding are not physically present in the
court part where the appearance is convened but rather appear
electronically at the proceeding through a computer or other digital
medium in a manner that allows participants to see and hear each other.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2028
* § 182.20 Electronic appearance rules.
1. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this chapter or any other
law, the court, in its discretion, may dispense with the physical
appearance of any party, including that of the defendant or any witness,
and proceed by means of an electronic appearance:
(a) at a plea, sentence, or evidentiary hearing where the defendant,
after consultation with counsel or a legal advisor, if any, and the
prosecutor consent on the record to conducting such proceeding by
electronic appearance;
(b) at an arraignment where the defendant, after consultation with
counsel or a legal advisor, if any, and the prosecutor consent on the
record to conducting such arraignment by electronic appearance, and
where (i) the defendant is receiving treatment at a hospital or other
health care facility at the time the arraignment is scheduled; (ii) the
defendant is being arraigned on a desk appearance ticket, a superseding
information, a superseding indictment, or a superior court information
when the defendant intends to enter any authorized guilty plea to such
an accusatory instrument during the same court proceeding; (iii)
temporary exigent circumstances exist, such as an extreme weather event,
which makes timely transporting of the defendant to court for an
arraignment unreasonably hazardous, provided that the court shall make a
record of why an electronic appearance under this subparagraph is
necessary; or (iv) the defendant requests to be arraigned by an
electronic appearance, provided that whenever an electronic appearance
is conducted at the defendant's request solely pursuant to this
subparagraph the only securing order which may be imposed shall be a
release on recognizance; and
(c) at all other types of proceedings, including calendar calls,
conferences, and arguments but not including trials or grand jury
presentments, provided that, in the event any party objects to
conducting such proceeding by electronic appearance, the court shall
allow any such party to be heard on the record and consider whether for
good cause shown the proceeding should not be conducted through an
electronic appearance.
2. Where consent to an electronic appearance is given pursuant to
paragraph (a) or (b) of subdivision one of this section and the
proceeding has commenced but the electronic appearance is subsequently
terminated and the proceeding is adjourned pursuant to subdivision four
or five of this section, such initial consent shall continue to govern
that proceeding, provided that such consent shall not modify the
requirement that the court terminate an electronic appearance and
adjourn a proceeding for the reasons outlined in such subdivisions four
and five of this section.
3. Any proceeding under this article shall provide an appropriate
opportunity for any defense attorney to confidentially consult with
their client or for a pro se defendant to confidentially consult with
their legal advisor, if any, during the proceeding.
4. Where, due to technological problems or limitations, a party to an
electronic appearance can hear and be heard but cannot see and/or cannot
be seen, the court may conduct the proceeding notwithstanding such
limitation, unless a party objects, in which case the electronic
appearance shall be terminated and adjourned. The authorization provided
by this subdivision to conduct an appearance where a party can hear and
be heard but cannot see and/or cannot be seen shall not apply to an
arraignment, a plea, a sentence, the testimony of a witness or the
appearance of a defendant who is incarcerated at the time of the
proceeding.
5. If, for any reason other than the circumstances justifying a
termination and adjournment pursuant to subdivision four of this
section, a party requests that an electronic appearance be terminated
and adjourned after it has commenced, the court shall grant that
application for good cause shown. Under this subdivision, good cause
shall include, but not be limited to, a determination that due to
technological problems: (a) the proceeding cannot be properly conducted;
(b) an attorney does not have an adequate opportunity to confidentially
consult with a client; or (c) a pro se defendant does not have an
adequate opportunity to confidentially consult with a legal advisor.
6. Electronic appearances shall be recorded by a stenographer to the
same extent as would be required were the appearance conducted with such
individuals physically present in court. No recording of an electronic
appearance shall be made, viewed or inspected except as may be
authorized by the rules of the chief administrator of the courts
pursuant to section 182.30 of this article.
7. Where a defendant in a proceeding is under the age of eighteen an
electronic appearance shall not be conducted.
8. Nothing in this article shall be construed as limiting a court's
authority to excuse a defendant's appearance, either where they would be
physically present or appearing by electronic means, during a
proceeding.
9. If a statute other than this article provides different rules for
conducting an electronic appearance for any particular kind of
proceeding, such other statute shall govern such proceeding and the
provisions of this article shall apply only to the extent this article
is not inconsistent with such other statute.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2028
* § 182.30 Regulation of electronic appearances by the chief
administrator.
The chief administrator of the courts shall adopt rules to regulate
the conduct of electronic appearances pursuant to this article that
shall, among other provisions, be designed to: (a) provide appropriate
access to electronic appearances by crime victims and their families,
family members of defendants, the media and other members of the public;
provided that such appropriate access shall be limited to the means of
projecting a proceeding being conducted entirely by electronic
appearances in a publicly accessible area of a courthouse or by
projecting the electronic appearances of a proceeding comprised of both
in-person physical appearances and electronic appearances in the
courtroom in which the proceeding is taking place; and (b) ensure that
any system for arraignments provides a full and fair opportunity for any
defendant, without prejudice, to choose to have an arraignment conducted
with the defendant physically present, rather than through an electronic
appearance.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2028
* § 182.40 Approval by the chief administrator of the courts.
1. The appropriate administrative judge shall submit to the chief
administrator of the courts a written proposal for the use of electronic
appearance in his or her jurisdiction. If the chief administrator of the
courts approves the proposal, installation of an independent
audio-visual system may begin.
2. Upon completion of the installation of an independent audio-visual
system, the commission on cable television shall inspect, test, and
examine the independent audio-visual system and certify to the chief
administrator of the courts whether the system complies with the
definition of an independent audio-visual system and is technically
suitable for the conducting of electronic appearances as intended.
3. The chief administrator of the courts shall issue rules governing
the use of electronic appearances.
* NB Repealed July 8, 2025
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
ARTICLE 185 Alternate Method of Arraignment
* § 185.10 Definition of terms.
As used in this article:
1. "Independent audio-visual system" shall mean an electronic system
for the transmission and receiving of audio and visual signals,
encompassing encoded signals, frequency domain multiplexing or other
suitable means to preclude the unauthorized reception and decoding of
the signals by commercially available television receivers, channel
converters, or other available receiving devices.
2. "Electronic arraignment" means an arraignment in which various
participants, including the defendant, are not personally present in the
court but in which all of the participants are simultaneously able to
see and hear reproductions of the voices and images of the judge,
counsels, defendant, police officer and any other appropriate
participant, by means of an independent audio-visual system.
* NB Expired September 1, 1983
* § 185.20 Electronic arraignment.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision nine of section 1.20,
sections 110.10, 120.10, 120.40, 120.90, 140.20, 140.27, 140.40, 170.10
and 180.10 of this chapter or any other provision of law as they pertain
to a defendant's personal appearance at arraignment, in Suffolk county,
the court in its discretion may dispense with the defendant's personal
appearance at the arraignment and conduct an electronic arraignment,
provided that:
1. The defendant has waived in writing his right to personally appear
at his arraignment and has consented to be arraigned by the electronic
arraignment process;
2. The district attorney has consented to the electronic arraignment
process for the defendant;
3. The personal appearance of the defendant at the arraignment would
result in an unreasonable delay in the preliminary proceeding; and
4. The chief administrator of the courts has authorized the use of
electronic arraignments for the court, pursuant to the provisions of
section 185.40 of this article.
* NB Expired September 1, 1983
* § 185.30 Conditions and limitations on electronic arraignment.
Whenever a person is arraigned by means of an electronic arraignment,
the following conditions and limitations shall apply:
1. The defendant may not enter a plea of guilty;
2. The electronic arraignment process may be used only when the
accusatory instrument does not charge a felony;
3. No electronic recording of an electronic arraignment may be made,
viewed or inspected except as may be authorized by rules of the chief
administrator of the courts; and
4. Stenographic recording of the arraignment shall be made to the
same extent as if it were an ordinary arraignment rather than an
electronic arraignment.
* NB Expired September 1, 1983
* § 185.40 Approval by the chief administrator of the courts.
1. The appropriate administrative judge shall submit to the chief
administrator of the courts a written proposal for the use of electronic
arraignments for a particular court and the precincts under the
jurisdiction of that court. If the chief administrator of the courts
approves the proposal, installation of an independent audio-visual
system may begin.
2. Upon completion of the installation of an independent audio-visual
system, the commission on cable television shall inspect, test and
examine the independent audio-visual system and certify to the chief
administrator of the courts whether the system complies with the
definition of an independent audio-visual system and is technically
suitable for the conducting of electronic arraignments as intended.
3. The use by a court of an approved independent audio-visual system
for the purpose of authorized electronic arraignments, shall be for a
period of two years from the date of authorization by the chief
administrator of the courts.
4. The chief administrator of the courts may withdraw approval of the
authorization at any time.
* NB Expired September 1, 1983
TITLE I Preliminary Proceedings In Superior Court
ARTICLE 190 The Grand Jury and Its Proceedings
Grand jury; definition and general functions.
A grand jury is a body consisting of not less than sixteen nor more
than twenty-three persons, impaneled by a superior court and
constituting a part of such court, the functions of which are to hear
and examine evidence concerning offenses and concerning misconduct,
nonfeasance and neglect in public office, whether criminal or otherwise,
and to take action with respect to such evidence as provided in section
Grand jury; for what courts drawn.
The appellate division of each judicial department shall adopt rules
governing the number and the terms for which grand juries shall be drawn
and impaneled by the superior courts within its department; provided,
however, that a grand jury may be drawn and impaneled for any
extraordinary term of the supreme court upon the order of a justice
assigned to hold such term.
Grand jury; duration of term and discharge.
1. A term of a superior court for which a grand jury has been
impaneled remains in existence at least until and including the opening
date of the next term of such court for which a grand jury has been
designated. Upon such date, or within five days preceding it, the court
may, upon declaration of both the grand jury and the district attorney
that such grand jury has not yet completed or will be unable to complete
certain business before it, extend the term of court and the existence
of such grand jury to a specified future date, and may subsequently
order further extensions for such purpose.
2. At any time when a grand jury is in recess and no other
appropriate grand jury is in existence in the county, the court may,
upon application of the district attorney or of a defendant held by a
local criminal court for the action of a grand jury, order such grand
jury reconvened for the purpose of dealing with a matter requiring grand
jury action.
Grand jury; formation, organization and other matters
preliminary to assumption of duties.
1. The mode of selecting grand jurors and of drawing and impaneling
grand juries is governed by the judiciary law.
2. Neither the grand jury panel nor any individual grand juror may be
challenged, but the court may:
(a) At any time before a grand jury is sworn, discharge the panel and
summon another panel if it finds that the original panel does not
substantially conform to the requirements of the judiciary law; or
(b) At any time after a grand juror is drawn, refuse to swear him, or
discharge him after he has been sworn, upon a finding that he is
disqualified from service pursuant to the judiciary law, or incapable of
performing his duties because of bias or prejudice, or guilty of
misconduct in the performance of his duties such as to impair the proper
functioning of the grand jury.
3. After a grand jury has been impaneled, the court must appoint one
of the grand jurors as foreman and another to act as foreman during any
absence or disability of the foreman. At some time before commencement
of their duties, the grand jurors must appoint one of their number as
secretary to keep records material to the conduct of the grand jury's
business.
4. The grand jurors must be sworn by the court. The oath may be in any
form or language which requires the grand jurors to perform their duties
faithfully.
5. After a grand jury has been sworn, the court must deliver or cause
to be delivered to each grand juror a printed copy of all the provisions
of this article, and the court may, in addition, give the grand jurors
any oral and written instructions relating to the proper performance of
their duties as it deems necessary or appropriate.
6. If two or more grand juries are impaneled at the same court term,
the court may thereafter, for good cause, transfer grand jurors from one
panel to another, and any grand juror so transferred is deemed to have
been sworn as a member of the panel to which he has been transferred.
Grand jury; proceedings and operation in general.
1. Proceedings of a grand jury are not valid unless at least sixteen
of its members are present. The finding of an indictment, a direction to
file a prosecutor's information, a decision to submit a grand jury
report and every other affirmative official action or decision requires
the concurrence of at least twelve members thereof.
2. The foreman or any other grand juror may administer an oath to any
witness appearing before the grand jury.
3. Except as provided in subdivision three-a of this section, during
the deliberations and voting of a grand jury, only the grand jurors may
be present in the grand jury room. During its other proceedings, the
following persons, in addition to witnesses, may, as the occasion
requires, also be present:
(a) The district attorney;
(b) A clerk or other public servant authorized to assist the grand
jury in the administrative conduct of its proceedings;
(c) A stenographer authorized to record the proceedings of the grand
jury;
(d) An interpreter. Upon request of the grand jury, the prosecutor
must provide an interpreter to interpret the testimony of any witness
who does not speak the English language well enough to be readily
understood. Such interpreter must, if he has not previously taken the
constitutional oath of office, first take an oath before the grand jury
that he will faithfully interpret the testimony of the witness and that
he will keep secret all matters before such grand jury within his
knowledge;
(e) A public servant holding a witness in custody. When a person held
in official custody is a witness before a grand jury, a public servant
assigned to guard him during his grand jury appearance may accompany him
in the grand jury room. Such public servant must, if he has not
previously taken the constitutional oath of office, first take an oath
before the grand jury that he will keep secret all matters before it
within his knowledge.
(f) An attorney representing a witness pursuant to section 190.52 of
this chapter while that witness is present.
(g) An operator, as that term is defined in section 190.32 of this
chapter, while the videotaped examination of either a special witness or
a child witness is being played.
(h) A social worker, rape crisis counselor, psychologist or other
professional providing emotional support to a child witness twelve years
old or younger, or a social worker or informal caregiver, as provided in
subdivision two of section two hundred six of the elder law, for a
vulnerable elderly person as provided in subdivision three of section
260.31 of the penal law, who is called to give evidence in a grand jury
proceeding concerning a crime defined in article one hundred twenty-one,
article one hundred thirty, article two hundred sixty, section 120.10,
125.10, 125.15, 125.20, 125.25, 125.26, 125.27, 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27
of the penal law provided that the district attorney consents. Such
support person shall not provide the witness with an answer to any
question or otherwise participate in such proceeding and shall first
take an oath before the grand jury that he or she will keep secret all
matters before such grand jury within his or her knowledge.
3-a. Upon the request of a deaf or hearing-impaired grand juror, the
prosecutor shall provide a sign language interpreter for such juror.
Such interpreter shall be present during all proceedings of the grand
jury which the deaf or hearing-impaired grand juror attends, including
deliberation and voting. The interpreter shall, if he or she has not
previously taken the constitutional oath of office, first take an oath
before the grand jury that he or she will faithfully interpret the
testimony of the witnesses and the statements of the prosecutor, judge
and grand jurors; keep secret all matters before such grand jury within
his or her knowledge; and not seek to influence the deliberations and
voting of such grand jury.
4. (a) Grand jury proceedings are secret, and no grand juror, or other
person specified in subdivision three of this section or section 215.70
of the penal law, may, except in the lawful discharge of his duties or
upon written order of the court, disclose the nature or substance of any
grand jury testimony, evidence, or any decision, result or other matter
attending a grand jury proceeding. For the purpose of assisting the
grand jury in conducting its investigation, evidence obtained by a grand
jury may be independently examined by the district attorney, members of
his staff, police officers specifically assigned to the investigation,
and such other persons as the court may specifically authorize. Such
evidence may not be disclosed to other persons without a court order.
Nothing contained herein shall prohibit a witness from disclosing his
own testimony.
(b) When a district attorney obtains evidence during a grand jury
proceeding which provides reasonable cause to suspect that a child has
been abused or maltreated, as those terms are defined by section ten
hundred twelve of the family court act, he must apply to the court
supervising the grand jury for an order permitting disclosure of such
evidence to the state central register of child abuse and maltreatment.
A district attorney need not apply to the court for such order if he has
previously made or caused a report to be made to the state central
register of child abuse and maltreatment pursuant to section four
hundred thirteen of the social services law and the evidence obtained
during the grand jury proceeding, or substantially similar information,
was included in such report. The district attorney's application to the
court shall be made ex parte and in camera. The court must grant the
application and permit the district attorney to disclose the evidence to
the state central register of child abuse and maltreatment unless the
court finds that such disclosure would jeopardize the life or safety of
any person or interfere with a continuing grand jury proceeding.
5. The grand jury is the exclusive judge of the facts with respect to
any matter before it.
6. The legal advisors of the grand jury are the court and the district
attorney, and the grand jury may not seek or receive legal advice from
any other source. Where necessary or appropriate, the court or the
district attorney, or both, must instruct the grand jury concerning the
law with respect to its duties or any matter before it, and such
instructions must be recorded in the minutes.
Grand jury; rules of evidence.
1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of
article sixty, governing rules of evidence and related matters with
respect to criminal proceedings in general, are, where appropriate,
applicable to grand jury proceedings.
2. A report or a copy of a report made by a public servant or by a
person employed by a public servant or agency who is a physicist,
chemist, coroner or medical examiner, firearms identification expert,
examiner of questioned documents, fingerprint technician, or an expert
or technician in some comparable scientific or professional field,
concerning the results of an examination, comparison or test performed
by him in connection with a case which is the subject of a grand jury
proceeding, may, when certified by such person as a report made by him
or as a true copy thereof, be received in such grand jury proceeding as
evidence of the facts stated therein.
2-a. When the electronic transmission of a certified report, or
certified copy thereof, of the kind described in subdivision two or
three-a of this section or a sworn statement or copy thereof, of the
kind described in subdivision three of this section results in a written
document, such written document may be received in such grand jury
proceeding provided that: (a) a transmittal memorandum completed by the
person sending the report contains a certification that the report has
not been altered and a description of the report specifying the number
of pages; and (b) the person who receives the electronically transmitted
document certifies that such document and transmittal memorandum were so
received; and (c) a certified report or a certified copy or sworn
statement or sworn copy thereof is filed with the court within twenty
days following arraignment upon the indictment; and (d) where such
written document is a sworn statement or sworn copy thereof of the kind
described in subdivision three of this section, such sworn statement or
sworn copy thereof is also provided to the defendant or his counsel
within twenty days following arraignment upon the indictment.
3. A written or oral statement, under oath, by a person attesting to
one or more of the following matters may be received in such grand jury
proceeding as evidence of the facts stated therein:
(a) that person's ownership or lawful custody of, or license to
occupy, premises, as defined in section 140.00 of the penal law, and of
the defendant's lack of license or privilege to enter or remain
thereupon;
(b) that person's ownership of, or possessory right in, property, the
nature and monetary amount of any damage thereto and the defendant's
lack of right to damage or tamper with the property;
(c) that person's ownership or lawful custody of, or license to
possess property, as defined in section 155.00 of the penal law,
including an automobile or other vehicle, its value and the defendant's
lack of superior or equal right to possession thereof;
(d) that person's ownership of a vehicle and the absence of his
consent to the defendant's taking, operating, exercising control over or
using it;
(e) that person's qualifications as a dealer or other expert in
appraising or evaluating a particular type of property, his expert
opinion as to the value of a certain item or items of property of that
type, and the basis for his opinion;
(f) that person's identity as an ostensible maker, drafter, drawer,
endorser or other signator of a written instrument and its falsity
within the meaning of section 170.00 of the penal law;
(g) that person's ownership of, or possessory right in, a credit card
account number or debit card account number, and the defendant's lack of
superior or equal right to use or possession thereof.
Provided, however, that no such statement shall be admitted when an
adversarial examination of such person has been previously ordered
pursuant to subdivision 8 of section 180.60, unless a transcript of such
examination is admitted.
3-a. A sex offender registration form, sex offender registration
continuation/supplemental form, sex offender registry address
verification form, sex offender change of address form or a copy of such
form maintained by the division of criminal justice services concerning
an individual who is the subject of a grand jury proceeding, may, when
certified by a person designated by the commissioner of the division of
criminal justice services as the person to certify such records, as a
true copy thereof, be received in such grand jury proceeding as evidence
of the facts stated therein.
4. An examination of a child witness or a special witness by the
district attorney videotaped pursuant to section 190.32 of this chapter
may be received in evidence in such grand jury proceeding as the
testimony of such witness.
5. Nothing in subdivisions two, three or four of this section shall be
construed to limit the power of the grand jury to cause any person to be
called as a witness pursuant to subdivision three of section 190.50.
6. Wherever it is provided in article sixty that the court in a
criminal proceeding must rule upon the competency of a witness to
testify or upon the admissibility of evidence, such ruling may in an
equivalent situation in a grand jury proceeding, be made by the district
attorney.
7. Wherever it is provided in article sixty that a court presiding at
a jury trial must instruct the jury with respect to the significance,
legal effect or evaluation of evidence, the district attorney, in an
equivalent situation in a grand jury proceeding, may so instruct the
grand jury.
8. (a) A business record may be received in such grand jury
proceedings as evidence of the following facts and similar facts stated
therein:
(i) a person's use of, subscription to and charges and payments for
communication equipment and services including but not limited to
equipment or services provided by telephone companies and internet
service providers, but not including recorded conversations or images
communicated thereby; and
(ii) financial transactions, and a person's ownership or possessory
interest in any account, at a bank, insurance company, brokerage,
exchange or banking organization as defined in section two of the
banking law.
(b) Any business record offered for consideration by a grand jury
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subdivision must be accompanied by a
written statement, under oath, that (i) contains a list or description
of the records it accompanies, (ii) attests in substance that the person
making the statement is a duly authorized custodian of the records or
other employee or agent of the business who is familiar with such
records, and (iii) attests in substance that such records were made in
the regular course of business and that it was the regular course of
such business to make such records at the time of the recorded act,
transaction, occurrence or event, or within a reasonable time
thereafter. Such written statement may also include a statement
identifying the name and job description of the person making the
statement, specifying the matters set forth in subparagraph (ii) of this
paragraph and attesting that the business has made a diligent search and
does not possess a particular record or records addressing a matter set
forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, and such statement may be
received at grand jury proceedings as evidence of the fact that the
business does not possess such record or records. When records of a
business are accompanied by more than one sworn written statement of its
employees or agents, such statements may be considered together in
determining the admissibility of the records under this subdivision. For
the purpose of this subdivision, the term "business records" does not
include any records prepared by law enforcement agencies or prepared by
any entity in anticipation of litigation.
(c) Any business record offered to a grand jury pursuant to paragraph
(a) of this subdivision that includes material beyond that described in
such paragraph (a) shall be redacted to exclude such additional
material, or received subject to a limiting instruction that the grand
jury shall not consider such additional material in support of any
criminal charge.
(d) No such records shall be admitted when an adversarial examination
of such a records custodian or other employee of such business who was
familiar with such records has been previously ordered pursuant to
subdivision eight of section 180.60 of this chapter, unless a transcript
of such examination is admitted.
(e) Nothing in this subdivision shall affect the admissibility of
business records in the grand jury on any basis other than that set
forth in this subdivision.
Videotaped examination; definitions, application, order and
procedure.
1. Definitions. As used in this section:
(a) "Child witness" means a person twelve years old or less whom the
people intend to call as witness in a grand jury proceeding to give
evidence concerning any crime defined in article one hundred thirty or
two hundred sixty or section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of the penal law
of which the person was a victim.
(b) "Special witness" means a person whom the people intend to call as
a witness in a grand jury proceeding and who is either:
(i) Unable to attend and testify in person in the grand jury
proceeding because the person is either physically ill or incapacitated;
or
(ii) More than twelve years old and who is likely to suffer very
severe emotional or mental stress if required to testify in person
concerning any crime defined in article one hundred thirty or two
hundred sixty or section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of the penal law to
which the person was a witness or of which the person was a victim.
(c) "Operator" means a person employed by the district attorney who
operates the video camera to record the examination of a child witness
or a special witness.
2. In lieu of requiring a witness who is a child witness to appear in
person and give evidence in a grand jury proceeding, the district
attorney may cause the examination of such witness to be videotaped in
accordance with the provisions of subdivision five of this section.
3. Whenever the district attorney has reason to believe that a witness
is a special witness, he may make an ex parte application to the court
for an order authorizing the videotaping of an examination of such
special witness and the subsequent introduction in evidence in a grand
jury proceeding of that videotape in lieu of the live testimony of such
special witness. The application must be in writing, must state the
grounds of the application and must contain sworn allegations of fact,
whether of the district attorney or another person or persons,
supporting such grounds. Such allegations may be based upon personal
knowledge of the deponent or upon information and belief, provided, that
in the latter event, the sources of such information and the grounds for
such belief are stated.
4. If the court is satisfied that a witness is a special witness, it
shall issue an order authorizing the videotaping of such special witness
in accordance with the provisions of subdivision five of this section.
The court order and the application and all supporting papers shall not
be disclosed to any person except upon further court order.
5. The videotaping of an examination either of a child witness or a
special witness shall proceed as follows:
(a) An examination of a child witness or a special witness which is to
be videotaped pursuant to this section may be conducted anywhere and at
any time provided that the operator begins the videotape by recording a
statement by the district attorney of the date, time and place of the
examination. In addition, the district attorney shall identify himself,
the operator and all other persons present.
(b) An accurate clock with a sweep second hand shall be placed next to
or behind the witness in such position as to enable the operator to
videotape the clock and the witness together during the entire
examination. In the alternative, a date and time generator shall be used
to superimpose the day, hour, minute and second over the video portion
of the recording during the entire examination.
(c) A social worker, rape crisis counselor, psychologist or other
professional providing emotional support to a child witness or to a
special witness, as defined in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (b) of
subdivision one of this section, or any of those persons enumerated in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of subdivision three of
section 190.25 may be present during the videotaping except that a
doctor, nurse or other medical assistant also may be present if required
by the attendant circumstances. Each person present, except the witness,
must, if he has not previously taken a constitutional oath of office or
an oath that he will keep secret all matters before a grand jury, must
take an oath on the record that he will keep secret the videotaped
examination.
(d) The district attorney shall state for the record the name of the
witness, and the caption and the grand jury number, if any, of the case.
If the witness to be examined is a child witness, the date of the
witness' birth must be recorded. If the witness to be examined is a
special witness, the date of the order authorizing the videotaped
examination and the name of the justice who issued the order shall be
recorded.
(e) If the witness will give sworn testimony, the administration of
the oath must be recorded. If the witness will give unsworn testimony, a
statement that the testimony is not under oath must be recorded.
(f) If the examination requires the use of more than one tape, the
operator shall record a statement of the district attorney at the end of
each tape declaring that such tape has ended and referring to the
succeeding tape. At the beginning of such succeeding tape, the operator
shall record a statement of the district attorney identifying himself,
the witness being examined and the number of tapes which have been used
to record the examination of such witness. At the conclusion of the
examination the operator shall record a statement of the district
attorney certifying that the recording has been completed, the number of
tapes on which the recording has been made and that such tapes
constitute a complete and accurate record of the examination of the
witness.
(g) A videotape of an examination conducted pursuant to this section
shall not be edited unless upon further order of the court.
6. When the videotape is introduced in evidence and played in the
grand jury, the grand jury stenographer shall record the examination in
the same manner as if the witness had testified in person.
7. Custody of the videotape shall be maintained in the same manner as
custody of the grand jury minutes.
Grand jury; witnesses, compulsion of evidence and immunity.
1. Every witness in a grand jury proceeding must give any evidence
legally requested of him regardless of any protest or belief on his part
that it may tend to incriminate him.
2. A witness who gives evidence in a grand jury proceeding receives
immunity unless:
(a) He has effectively waived such immunity pursuant to section
190.45; or
(b) Such evidence is not responsive to any inquiry and is
gratuitously given or volunteered by the witness with knowledge that it
is not responsive.
(c) The evidence given by the witness consists only of books, papers,
records or other physical evidence of an enterprise, as defined in
subdivision one of section 175.00 of the penal law, the production of
which is required by a subpoena duces tecum, and the witness does not
possess a privilege against self-incrimination with respect to the
production of such evidence. Any further evidence given by the witness
entitles the witness to immunity except as provided in subparagraph (a)
and (b) of this subdivision.
Grand jury; waiver of immunity.
1. A waiver of immunity is a written instrument subscribed by a
person who is or is about to become a witness in a grand jury
proceeding, stipulating that he waives his privilege against
self-incrimination and any possible or prospective immunity to which he
would otherwise become entitled, pursuant to section 190.40, as a result
of giving evidence in such proceeding.
2. A waiver of immunity is not effective unless and until it is sworn
to before the grand jury conducting the proceeding in which the
subscriber has been called as a witness.
3. A person who is called by the people as a witness in a grand jury
proceeding and requested by the district attorney to subscribe and swear
to a waiver of immunity before giving evidence has a right to confer
with counsel before deciding whether he will comply with such request,
and, if he desires to avail himself of such right, he must be accorded a
reasonable time in which to obtain and confer with counsel for such
purpose. The district attorney must inform the witness of all such
rights before obtaining his execution of such a waiver of immunity. Any
waiver obtained, subscribed or sworn to in violation of the provisions
of this subdivision is invalid and ineffective.
4. If a grand jury witness subscribes and swears to a waiver of
immunity upon a written agreement with the district attorney that the
interrogation will be limited to certain specified subjects, matters or
areas of conduct, and if after the commencement of his testimony he is
interrogated and testifies concerning another subject, matter or area of
conduct not included in such written agreement, he receives immunity
with respect to any further testimony which he may give concerning such
other subject, matter or area of conduct and the waiver of immunity is
to that extent ineffective.
Grand jury; who may call witnesses; defendant as witness.
1. Except as provided in this section, no person has a right to call
a witness or appear as a witness in a grand jury proceeding.
2. The people may call as a witness in a grand jury proceeding any
person believed by the district attorney to possess relevant information
or knowledge.
3. The grand jury may cause to be called as a witness any person
believed by it to possess relevant information or knowledge. If the
grand jury desires to hear any such witness who was not called by the
people, it may direct the district attorney to issue and serve a
subpoena upon such witness, and the district attorney must comply with
such direction. At any time after such a direction, however, or at any
time after the service of a subpoena pursuant to such a direction and
before the return date thereof, the people may apply to the court which
impaneled the grand jury for an order vacating or modifying such
direction or subpoena on the ground that such is in the public interest.
Upon such application, the court may in its discretion vacate the
direction or subpoena, attach reasonable conditions thereto, or make
other appropriate qualification thereof.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision three, the district
attorney may demand that any witness thus called at the instance of the
grand jury sign a waiver of immunity pursuant to section 190.45 before
being sworn, and upon such demand no oath may be administered to such
witness unless and until he complies therewith.
5. Although not called as a witness by the people or at the instance
of the grand jury, a person has a right to be a witness in a grand jury
proceeding under circumstances prescribed in this subdivision:
(a) When a criminal charge against a person is being or is about to
be or has been submitted to a grand jury, such person has a right to
appear before such grand jury as a witness in his own behalf if, prior
to the filing of any indictment or any direction to file a prosecutor's
information in the matter, he serves upon the district attorney of the
county a written notice making such request and stating an address to
which communications may be sent. The district attorney is not obliged
to inform such a person that such a grand jury proceeding against him is
pending, in progress or about to occur unless such person is a defendant
who has been arraigned in a local criminal court upon a currently
undisposed of felony complaint charging an offense which is a subject of
the prospective or pending grand jury proceeding. In such case, the
district attorney must notify the defendant or his attorney of the
prospective or pending grand jury proceeding and accord the defendant a
reasonable time to exercise his right to appear as a witness therein;
(b) Upon service upon the district attorney of a notice requesting
appearance before a grand jury pursuant to paragraph (a), the district
attorney must notify the foreman of the grand jury of such request, and
must subsequently serve upon the applicant, at the address specified by
him, a notice that he will be heard by the grand jury at a given time
and place. Upon appearing at such time and place, and upon signing and
submitting to the grand jury a waiver of immunity pursuant to section
190.45, such person must be permitted to testify before the grand jury
and to give any relevant and competent evidence concerning the case
under consideration. Upon giving such evidence, he is subject to
examination by the people.
(c) Any indictment or direction to file a prosecutor's information
obtained or filed in violation of the provisions of paragraph (a) or (b)
is invalid and, upon a motion made pursuant to section 170.50 or section
210.20, must be dismissed; provided that a motion based upon such ground
must be made not more than five days after the defendant has been
arraigned upon the indictment or, as the case may be, upon the
prosecutor's information resulting from the grand jury's direction to
file the same. If the contention is not so asserted in timely fashion,
it is waived and the indictment or prosecutor's information may not
thereafter be challenged on such ground.
6. A defendant or person against whom a criminal charge is being or
is about to be brought in a grand jury proceeding may request the grand
jury, either orally or in writing, to cause a person designated by him
to be called as a witness in such proceeding. The grand jury may as a
matter of discretion grant such request and cause such witness to be
called pursuant to subdivision three.
7. Where a subpoena is made pursuant to this section, all papers and
proceedings relating to the subpoena and any motion to quash, fix
conditions, modify or compel compliance shall be kept secret and not
disclosed to the public by any public officer or public employee or any
other individual described in section 215.70 of the penal law. This
subdivision shall not apply where the person subpoenaed and the
prosecutor waive the provisions of this subdivision.
This subdivision shall not prevent the publication of decisions and
orders made in connection with such proceedings or motions, provided the
caption and content of the decision are written or altered by the court
to reasonably preclude identification of the person subpoenaed.
Grand jury; attorney for witness.
1. Any person who appears as a witness and has signed a waiver of
immunity in a grand jury proceeding, has a right to an attorney as
provided in this section. Such a witness may appear with a retained
attorney, or if he is financially unable to obtain counsel, an attorney
who shall be assigned by the superior court which impaneled the grand
jury. Such assigned attorney shall be assigned pursuant to the same
plan and in the same manner as counsel are provided to persons charged
with crime pursuant to section seven hundred twenty-two of the county
law.
2. The attorney for such witness may be present with the witness in
the grand jury room. The attorney may advise the witness, but may not
otherwise take any part in the proceeding.
3. The superior court which impaneled the grand jury shall have the
same power to remove an attorney from the grand jury room as such court
has with respect to an attorney in a courtroom.
Grand jury; matters to be heard and examined; duties and
authority of district attorney.
1. A grand jury may hear and examine evidence concerning the alleged
commission of any offense prosecutable in the courts of the county, and
concerning any misconduct, nonfeasance or neglect in public office by a
public servant, whether criminal or otherwise.
2. District attorneys are required or authorized to submit evidence
to grand juries under the following circumstances:
(a) A district attorney must submit to a grand jury evidence
concerning a felony allegedly committed by a defendant who, on the basis
of a felony complaint filed with a local criminal court of the county,
has been held for the action of a grand jury of such county, except
where indictment has been waived by the defendant pursuant to article
one hundred ninety-five.
(b) A district attorney must submit to a grand jury evidence
concerning a misdemeanor allegedly committed by a defendant who has been
charged therewith by a local criminal court accusatory instrument, in
any case where a superior court of the county has, pursuant to
subdivision one of section 170.25, ordered that such misdemeanor charge
be prosecuted by indictment in a superior court.
(c) A district attorney may submit to a grand jury any available
evidence concerning an offense prosecutable in the courts of the county,
or concerning misconduct, nonfeasance or neglect in public office by a
public servant, whether criminal or otherwise.
Grand jury; action to be taken.
After hearing and examining evidence as prescribed in section 190.55,
a grand jury may:
1. Indict a person for an offense, as provided in section 190.65;
2. Direct the district attorney to file a prosecutor's information
with a local criminal court, as provided in section 190.70;
3. Direct the district attorney to file a request for removal to the
family court, as provided in section 190.71 of this article.
4. Dismiss the charge before it, as provided in section 190.75;
5. Submit a grand jury report, as provided in section 190.85.
Grand jury; when indictment is authorized.
1. Subject to the rules prescribing the kinds of offenses which may
be charged in an indictment, a grand jury may indict a person for an
offense when (a) the evidence before it is legally sufficient to
establish that such person committed such offense provided, however,
such evidence is not legally sufficient when corroboration that would be
required, as a matter of law, to sustain a conviction for such offense
is absent, and (b) competent and admissible evidence before it provides
reasonable cause to believe that such person committed such offense.
2. The offense or offenses for which a grand jury may indict a person
in any particular case are not limited to that or those which may have
been designated, at the commencement of the grand jury proceeding, to be
the subject of the inquiry; and even in a case submitted to it upon a
court order, pursuant to the provisions of section 170.25, directing
that a misdemeanor charge pending in a local criminal court be
prosecuted by indictment, the grand jury may indict the defendant for a
felony if the evidence so warrants.
3. Upon voting to indict a person, a grand jury must, through its
foreman or acting foreman, file an indictment with the court by which it
was impaneled.
Grand jury; direction to file prosecutor's information and
related matters.
1. Except in a case submitted to it pursuant to the provisions of
section 170.25, a grand jury may direct the district attorney to file in
a local criminal court a prosecutor's information charging a person with
an offense other than a felony when (a) the evidence before it is
legally sufficient to establish that such person committed such offense,
and (b) competent and admissible evidence before it provides reasonable
cause to believe that such person committed such offense. In such case,
the grand jury must, through its foreman or acting foreman, file such
direction with the court by which it was impaneled.
2. Such direction must be signed by the foreman or acting foreman.
It must contain a plain and concise statement of the conduct
constituting the offense to be charged, equivalent in content and
precision to the factual statement required to be contained in an
indictment pursuant to subdivision seven of section 200.50. Subject to
the rules prescribed in sections 200.20 and 200.40 governing joinder in
a single indictment of multiple offenses and multiple defendants, such
grand jury direction may, where appropriate, specify multiple offenses
of less than felony grade and multiple defendants, and may direct that
the prospective prosecutor's information charge a single defendant with
multiple offenses, or multiple defendants jointly with either a single
offense or multiple offenses.
3. Upon the filing of such grand jury direction, the court must,
unless such direction is insufficient on its face, issue an order
approving such direction and ordering the district attorney to file such
a prosecutor's information in a designated local criminal court having
trial jurisdiction of the offense or offenses in question.
Grand jury; direction to file request for removal to family
court.
(a) Except as provided in subdivision six of section 200.20 of this
chapter, a grand jury may not indict (i) a person thirteen years of age
for any conduct or crime other than conduct constituting a crime defined
in subdivisions one and two of section 125.25 (murder in the second
degree) or such conduct as a sexually motivated felony, where authorized
pursuant to section 130.91 of the penal law; (ii) a person fourteen or
fifteen years of age for any conduct or crime other than conduct
constituting a crime defined in subdivisions one and two of section
125.25 (murder in the second degree) and in subdivision three of such
section provided that the underlying crime for the murder charge is one
for which such person is criminally responsible; 135.25 (kidnapping in
the first degree); 150.20 (arson in the first degree); subdivisions one
and two of section 120.10 (assault in the first degree); 125.20
(manslaughter in the first degree); paragraphs (a) and (b) of
subdivision one, paragraphs (a) and (b) of subdivision two and
paragraphs (a) and (b) of subdivision three of section 130.35 (rape in
the first degree); former subdivisions one and two of section 130.35
(rape in the first degree); subdivisions one and two of former section
130.50; 130.70 (aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree); 140.30
(burglary in the first degree); subdivision one of section 140.25
(burglary in the second degree); 150.15 (arson in the second degree);
160.15 (robbery in the first degree); subdivision two of section 160.10
(robbery in the second degree) of the penal law; or section 265.03 of
the penal law, where such machine gun or such firearm is possessed on
school grounds, as that phrase is defined in subdivision fourteen of
section 220.00 of the penal law; or defined in the penal law as an
attempt to commit murder in the second degree or kidnapping in the first
degree, or such conduct as a sexually motivated felony, where authorized
pursuant to section 130.91 of the penal law.
(b) A grand jury may vote to file a request to remove a charge to the
family court if it finds that a person sixteen, or commencing October
first, two thousand nineteen, seventeen years of age or younger did an
act which, if done by a person over the age of sixteen, or commencing
October first, two thousand nineteen, seventeen, would constitute a
crime provided (1) such act is one for which it may not indict; (2) it
does not indict such person for a crime; and (3) the evidence before it
is legally sufficient to establish that such person did such act and
competent and admissible evidence before it provides reasonable cause to
believe that such person did such act.
(c) Upon voting to remove a charge to the family court pursuant to
subdivision (b) of this section, the grand jury must, through its
foreman or acting foreman, file a request to transfer such charge to the
family court. Such request shall be filed with the court by which it was
impaneled. It must (1) allege that a person named therein did any act
which, if done by a person over the age of sixteen, would constitute a
crime; (2) specify the act and the time and place of its commission; and
(3) be signed by the foreman or the acting foreman.
(d) Upon the filing of such grand jury request, the court must, unless
such request is improper or insufficient on its face, issue an order
approving such request and direct that the charge be removed to the
family court in accordance with the provisions of article seven hundred
twenty-five of this chapter.
Grand jury; dismissal of charge.
1. If upon a charge that a designated person committed a crime,
either (a) the evidence before the grand jury is not legally sufficient
to establish that such person committed such crime or any other offense,
or (b) the grand jury is not satisfied that there is reasonable cause to
believe that such person committed such crime or any other offense, it
must dismiss the charge. In such case, the grand jury must, through its
foreman or acting foreman, file its finding of dismissal with the court
by which it was impaneled.
2. If the defendant was previously held for the action of the grand
jury by a local criminal court, the superior court to which such
dismissal is presented must order the defendant released from custody if
he is in the custody of the sheriff, or, if he is at liberty on bail, it
must exonerate the bail.
3. When a charge has been so dismissed, it may not again be submitted
to a grand jury unless the court in its discretion authorizes or directs
the people to resubmit such charge to the same or another grand jury.
If in such case the charge is again dismissed, it may not again be
submitted to a grand jury.
4. Whenever all charges against a designated person have been so
dismissed, the district attorney must within ninety days of the filing
of the finding of such dismissal, notify that person of the dismissal by
regular mail to his last known address unless resubmission has been
permitted pursuant to subdivision three of this section or an order of
postponement of such service is obtained upon a showing of good cause
and exigent circumstances.
Grand jury; release of defendant upon failure of timely grand
jury action.
Upon application of a defendant who on the basis of a felony complaint
has been held by a local criminal court for the action of a grand jury,
and who, at the time of such order or subsequent thereto, has been
committed to the custody of the sheriff pending such grand jury action,
and who has been confined in such custody for a period of more than
forty-five days, or, in the case of a juvenile offender or adolescent
offender, thirty days, without the occurrence of any grand jury action
or disposition pursuant to subdivision one, two or three of section
190.60, the superior court by which such grand jury was or is to be
impaneled must release him on his own recognizance unless:
(a) The lack of a grand jury disposition during such period of
confinement was due to the defendant's request, action or condition, or
occurred with his consent; or
(b) The people have shown good cause why such order of release should
not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some compelling fact or
circumstance which precluded grand jury action within the prescribed
period or rendered the same against the interest of justice.
Grand jury; grand jury reports.
1. The grand jury may submit to the court by which it was impaneled, a
report:
(a) Concerning misconduct, non-feasance or neglect in public office
by a public servant as the basis for a recommendation of removal or
disciplinary action; or
(b) Stating that after investigation of a public servant it finds no
misconduct, non-feasance or neglect in office by him provided that such
public servant has requested the submission of such report; or
(c) Proposing recommendations for legislative, executive or
administrative action in the public interest based upon stated findings.
2. The court to which such report is submitted shall examine it and
the minutes of the grand jury and, except as otherwise provided in
subdivision four, shall make an order accepting and filing such report
as a public record only if the court is satisfied that it complies with
the provisions of subdivision one and that:
(a) The report is based upon facts revealed in the course of an
investigation authorized by section 190.55 and is supported by the
preponderance of the credible and legally admissible evidence; and
(b) When the report is submitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of
subdivision one, that each person named therein was afforded an
opportunity to testify before the grand jury prior to the filing of such
report, and when the report is submitted pursuant to paragraph (b) or
(c) of subdivision one, it is not critical of an identified or
identifiable person.
3. The order accepting a report pursuant to paragraph (a) of
subdivision one, and the report itself, must be sealed by the court and
may not be filed as a public record, or be subject to subpoena or
otherwise be made public until at least thirty-one days after a copy of
the order and the report are served upon each public servant named
therein, or if an appeal is taken pursuant to section 190.90, until the
affirmance of the order accepting the report, or until reversal of the
order sealing the report, or until dismissal of the appeal of the named
public servant by the appellate division, whichever occurs later. Such
public servant may file with the clerk of the court an answer to such
report, not later than twenty days after service of the order and report
upon him. Such an answer shall plainly and concisely state the facts
and law constituting the defense of the public servant to the charges in
said report, and, except for those parts of the answer which the court
may determine to be scandalously or prejudicially and unnecessarily
inserted therein, shall become an appendix to the report. Upon the
expiration of the time set forth in this subdivision, the district
attorney shall deliver a true copy of such report, and the appendix if
any, for appropriate action, to each public servant or body having
removal or disciplinary authority over each public servant named
therein.
4. Upon the submission of a report pursuant to subdivision one, if
the court finds that the filing of such report as a public record, may
prejudice fair consideration of a pending criminal matter, it must order
such report sealed and such report may not be subject to subpoena or
public inspection during the pendency of such criminal matter, except
upon order of the court.
5. Whenever the court to which a report is submitted pursuant to
paragraph (a) of subdivision one is not satisfied that the report
complies with the provisions of subdivision two, it may direct that
additional testimony be taken before the same grand jury, or it must
make an order sealing such report, and the report may not be filed as a
public record, or be subject to subpoena or otherwise be made public.
Grand jury; appeal from order concerning grand jury reports.
1. When a court makes an order accepting a report of a grand jury
pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 190.85, any
public servant named therein may appeal the order; and when a court
makes an order sealing a report of a grand jury pursuant to subdivision
five of section 190.85, the district attorney or other attorney
designated by the grand jury may appeal the order.
2. When a court makes an order sealing a report of a grand jury
pursuant to subdivision five of section 190.85, the district attorney or
other attorney designated by the grand jury may, within ten days after
service of a copy of the order and report upon each public servant named
in the report, appeal the order to the appellate division of the
department in which the order was made, by filing in duplicate a notice
of appeal from the order with the clerk of the court in which the order
was made and by serving a copy of such notice of appeal upon each such
public servant. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of section
190.85, a true copy of the report of the grand jury shall be served,
together with such notice of appeal, upon each such public servant.
3. The mode of and time for perfecting an appeal pursuant to this
section, and the mode of and procedure for the argument thereof, are
determined by the rules of the appellate division of the department in
which the appeal is brought. Such rules shall prescribe the matters
referred to in subdivision one of section 460.70 and in section 460.80,
except that such appeal is a preferred cause and the appellate division
of each department shall promulgate rules to effectuate such preference.
4. The record and all other presentations on appeal shall remain
sealed, except that upon reversal of the order sealing the report or
dismissal of the appeal of the named public servant by the appellate
division, the report of the grand jury, with the appendix, if any, shall
be filed as a public record as provided in subdivision three of section
190.85.
5. The procedure provided for in this section shall be the exclusive
manner of reviewing an order made pursuant to section 190.85 and the
appellate division of the supreme court shall be the sole court having
jurisdiction of such an appeal. The order of the appellate division
finally determining such appeal shall not be subject to review in any
other court or proceeding.
6. The grand jury in an appeal pursuant to this section shall be
represented by the district attorney unless the report relates to him or
his office, in which event the grand jury may designate another
attorney.
ARTICLE 195 Waiver of Indictment
Waiver of indictment; in general.
1. A defendant may waive indictment and consent to be prosecuted by
superior court information when:
(a) a local criminal court has held the defendant for the action of a
grand jury; and
(b) the defendant is not charged with a class A felony punishable by
death or life imprisonment; and
(c) the district attorney consents to the waiver.
2. A defendant may waive indictment pursuant to subdivision one in
either:
(a) the local criminal court in which the order was issued holding the
defendant for action of a grand jury, at the time such order is issued;
or
(b) the appropriate superior court, at any time prior to the filing of
an indictment by the grand jury.
Waiver of indictment; written instrument.
A waiver of indictment shall be evidenced by a written instrument,
which shall contain the name of the court in which it is executed, the
title of the action, and the name, date and approximate time and place
of each offense to be charged in the superior court information to be
filed by the district attorney pursuant to section 195.40. The offenses
named may include any offense for which the defendant was held for
action of a grand jury and any offense or offenses properly joinable
therewith pursuant to sections 200.20 and 200.40. The written waiver
shall also contain a statement by the defendant that he is aware that:
(a) under the constitution of the state of New York he has the right
to be prosecuted by indictment filed by a grand jury;
(b) he waives such right and consents to be prosecuted by superior
court information to be filed by the district attorney;
(c) the superior court information to be filed by the district
attorney will charge the offenses named in the written waiver; and
(d) the superior court information to be filed by the district
attorney will have the same force and effect as an indictment filed by a
grand jury.
The written waiver shall be signed by the defendant in open court in
the presence of his attorney. The consent of the district attorney
shall be endorsed thereon.
Waiver of indictment; approval of waiver by the court.
The court shall determine whether the waiver of indictment complies
with the provisions of sections 195.10 and 195.20. If satisfied that
the waiver complies with such provisions, the court shall approve the
waiver and execute a written order to that effect. When the waiver is
approved by a local criminal court, the local criminal court shall
promptly transmit to the appropriate superior court the written waiver
and order approving the waiver, along with all other documents pertinent
to the action. Until such papers are received by the superior court,
the action is deemed to be pending in the local criminal court.
Waiver of indictment; filing of superior court information.
When indictment is waived in a superior court the district attorney
shall file a superior court information in such court at the time the
waiver is executed. When indictment is waived in a local criminal court
the district attorney shall file a superior court information in the
appropriate superior court within ten days of the execution of the court
order approving the waiver. Upon application of a defendant whose
waiver of indictment has been approved by the court, and who, at the
time of such approval or subsequent thereto, has been committed to the
custody of the sheriff pending disposition of the action, and who has
been confined in such custody for a period of more than ten days from
the date of approval without the filing by the district attorney of a
superior court information, the superior court must release him on his
own recognizance unless:
(a) The failure of the district attorney to file a superior court
information during such period of confinement was due to defendant's
request, action or condition or occurred with his consent; or
(b) The people have shown good cause why such order of release should
not be issued. Such good cause must consist of some compelling fact or
circumstance which precluded the filing of the superior court
information within the prescribed period.
ARTICLE 200 Indictment and Related Instruments
Indictment; definition.
An indictment is a written accusation by a grand jury, filed with a
superior court, charging a person, or two or more persons jointly, with
the commission of a crime, or with the commission of two or more
offenses at least one of which is a crime. Except as used in Article
190, the term indictment shall include a superior court information.
Superior court information; definition.
A superior court information is a written accusation by a district
attorney filed in a superior court pursuant to article one hundred
ninety-five, charging a person, or two or more persons jointly, with the
commission of a crime, or with the commission of two or more offenses,
at least one of which is a crime. A superior court information may
include any offense for which the defendant was held for action of a
grand jury and any offense or offenses properly joinable therewith
pursuant to sections 200.20 and 200.40, but shall not include an offense
not named in the written waiver of indictment executed pursuant to
section 195.20. A superior court information has the same force and
effect as an indictment and all procedures and provisions of law
applicable to indictments are also applicable to superior court
informations, except where otherwise expressly provided.
Indictment; what offenses may be charged; joinder of offenses
and consolidation of indictments.
1. An indictment must charge at least one crime and may, in addition,
charge in separate counts one or more other offenses, including petty
offenses, provided that all such offenses are joinable pursuant to the
principles prescribed in subdivision two.
2. Two offenses are "joinable" when:
(a) They are based upon the same act or upon the same criminal
transaction, as that term is defined in subdivision two of section
40.10; or
(b) Even though based upon different criminal transactions, such
offenses, or the criminal transactions underlying them, are of such
nature that either proof of the first offense would be material and
admissible as evidence in chief upon a trial of the second, or proof of
the second would be material and admissible as evidence in chief upon a
trial of the first; or
(c) Even though based upon different criminal transactions, and even
though not joinable pursuant to paragraph (b), such offenses are defined
by the same or similar statutory provisions and consequently are the
same or similar in law; or
(d) Though not directly joinable with each other pursuant to paragraph
(a), (b) or (c), each is so joinable with a third offense contained in
the indictment. In such case, each of the three offenses may properly be
joined not only with each of the other two but also with any further
offense joinable with either of the other two, and the chain of joinder
may be further extended accordingly.
3. In any case where two or more offenses or groups of offenses
charged in an indictment are based upon different criminal transactions,
and where their joinability rests solely upon the fact that such
offenses, or as the case may be at least one offense of each group, are
the same or similar in law, as prescribed in paragraph (c) of
subdivision two, the court, in the interest of justice and for good
cause shown, may, upon application of either a defendant or the people,
in its discretion, order that any such offenses be tried separately from
the other or others thereof. Good cause shall include but not be limited
to situations where there is:
(a) Substantially more proof on one or more such joinable offenses
than on others and there is a substantial likelihood that the jury would
be unable to consider separately the proof as it relates to each
offense.
(b) A convincing showing that a defendant has both important testimony
to give concerning one count and a genuine need to refrain from
testifying on the other, which satisfies the court that the risk of
prejudice is substantial.
(i) Good cause, under this paragraph (b), may be established in
writing or upon oral representation of counsel on the record. Any
written or oral representation may be based upon information and belief,
provided the sources of such information and the grounds of such belief
are set forth.
(ii) Upon the request of counsel, any written or recorded showing
concerning the defendant's genuine need to refrain from testifying shall
be ex parte and in camera. The in camera showing shall be sealed but a
court for good cause may order unsealing. Any statements made by counsel
in the course of an application under this paragraph (b) may not be
offered against the defendant in any criminal action for impeachment
purposes or otherwise.
4. When two or more indictments against the same defendant or
defendants charge different offenses of a kind that are joinable in a
single indictment pursuant to subdivision two, the court may, upon
application of either the people or a defendant, order that such
indictments be consolidated and treated as a single indictment for trial
purposes. If such indictments, in addition to charging offenses which
are so joinable charge other offenses which are not so joinable, they
may nevertheless be consolidated for the limited purpose of jointly
trying the joinable offenses. In such case, such indictments remain in
existence with respect to any nonjoinable offenses and may be prosecuted
accordingly. Nothing herein precludes the consolidation of an
indictment with a superior court information.
5. A court's determination of an application for consolidation
pursuant to subdivision four is discretionary; except that where an
application by the defendant seeks consolidation with respect to
offenses which are, pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision two, of a
kind that are joinable in a single indictment by reason of being based
upon the same act or criminal transaction, the court must order such
consolidation unless good cause to the contrary be shown.
6. Where an indictment charges at least one offense against a
defendant who was under the age of seventeen, or commencing October
first, two thousand nineteen, eighteen at the time of the commission of
the crime and who did not lack criminal responsibility for such crime by
reason of infancy, the indictment may, in addition, charge in separate
counts one or more other offenses for which such person would not have
been criminally responsible by reason of infancy, if:
(a) the offense for which the defendant is criminally responsible and
the one or more other offenses for which he or she would not have been
criminally responsible by reason of infancy are based upon the same act
or upon the same criminal transaction, as that term is defined in
subdivision two of section 40.10 of this chapter; or
(b) the offenses are of such nature that either proof of the first
offense would be material and admissible as evidence in chief upon a
trial of the second, or proof of the second would be material and
admissible as evidence in chief upon a trial of the first.
Indictment; duplicitous counts prohibited.
1. Each count of an indictment may charge one offense only.
2. For purpose of this section, a statutory provision which defines
the offense named in the title thereof by providing, in different
subdivisions or paragraphs, different ways in which such named offense
may be committed, defines a separate offense in each such subdivision or
paragraph, and a count of an indictment charging such named offense
which, without specifying or clearly indicating the particular
subdivision or paragraph of the statutory provision, alleges facts which
would support a conviction under more than one such subdivision or
paragraph, charges more than one offense.
Indictment; joinder of defendants and consolidation of
indictments against different defendants.
1. Two or more defendants may be jointly charged in a single
indictment provided that:
(a) all such defendants are jointly charged with every offense alleged
therein; or
(b) all the offenses charged are based upon a common scheme or plan;
or
(c) all the offenses charged are based upon the same criminal
transaction as that term is defined in subdivision two of section 40.10;
or
(d) if the indictment includes a count charging enterprise corruption:
(i) all the defendants are jointly charged with every count of
enterprise corruption alleged therein; and
(ii) every offense, other than a count alleging enterprise corruption,
is a criminal act specifically included in the pattern of criminal
activity on which the charge or charges of enterprise corruption is or
are based; and
(iii) each such defendant could have been jointly charged with at
least one of the other defendants, absent an enterprise corruption
count, under the provisions of paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of this
subdivision, in an accusatory instrument charging at least one such
specifically included criminal act. For purposes of this subparagraph,
joinder shall not be precluded on the ground that a specifically
included criminal act which is necessary to permit joinder is not
currently prosecutable, when standing alone, by reason of previous
prosecution or lack of geographical jurisdiction.
Even in such case, the court, upon motion of a defendant or the people
made within the period provided by section 255.20, may for good cause
shown order in its discretion that any defendant be tried separately
from the other or from one or more or all of the others. Good cause
shall include, but not be limited to, a finding that a defendant or the
people will be unduly prejudiced by a joint trial or, in the case of a
prosecution involving a charge of enterprise corruption, a finding that
proof of one or more criminal acts alleged to have been committed by one
defendant but not one or more of the others creates a likelihood that
the jury may not be able to consider separately the proof as it relates
to each defendant, or in such a case, given the scope of the pattern of
criminal activity charged against all the defendants, a particular
defendant's comparatively minor role in it creates a likelihood of
prejudice to him. Upon such a finding of prejudice, the court may order
counts to be tried separately, grant a severance of defendants or
provide whatever other relief justice requires.
2. When two or more defendants are charged in separate indictments
with an offense or offenses but could have been so charged in a single
indictment under subdivision one above, the court may, upon application
of the people, order that such indictments be consolidated and the
charges be heard in a single trial. If such indictments also charge
offenses not properly the subject of a single indictment under
subdivision one above, those offenses shall not be consolidated, but
shall remain in existence and may be separately prosecuted. Nothing
herein precludes the consolidation of an indictment with a superior
court information.
Indictment; form and content.
An indictment must contain:
1. The name of the superior court in which it is filed; and
2. The title of the action and, where the defendant is a juvenile
offender, a statement in the title that the defendant is charged as a
juvenile offender; and
3. A separate accusation or count addressed to each offense charged,
if there be more than one; and
4. A statement in each count that the grand jury, or, where the
accusatory instrument is a superior court information, the district
attorney, accuses the defendant or defendants of a designated offense,
provided that in any prosecution under article four hundred eighty-five
of the penal law, the designated offense shall be the specified offense,
as defined in subdivision three of section 485.05 of the penal law,
followed by the phrase "as a hate crime", and provided further that in
any prosecution under section 490.25 of the penal law, the designated
offense shall be the specified offense, as defined in subdivision three
of section 490.05 of the penal law, followed by the phrase "as a crime
of terrorism"; and provided further that in any prosecution under
section 130.91 of the penal law, the designated offense shall be the
specified offense, as defined in subdivision two of section 130.91 of
the penal law, followed by the phrase "as a sexually motivated felony";
and provided further that in any prosecution under section 496.06 of the
penal law, the designated offense shall be the specified offense, as
defined in subdivision two of such section, followed by the phrase "as a
public corruption crime"; and
5. A statement in each count that the offense charged therein was
committed in a designated county; and
6. A statement in each count that the offense charged therein was
committed on, or on or about, a designated date, or during a designated
period of time; and
7. A plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without
allegations of an evidentiary nature,
(a) asserts facts supporting every element of the offense charged and
the defendant's or defendants' commission thereof with sufficient
precision to clearly apprise the defendant or defendants of the conduct
which is the subject of the accusation; and
(b) in the case of any armed felony, as defined in subdivision
forty-one of section 1.20, states that such offense is an armed felony
and specifies the particular implement the defendant or defendants
possessed, were armed with, used or displayed or, in the case of an
implement displayed, specifies what the implement appeared to be; and
(c) in the case of any hate crime, as defined in section 485.05 of the
penal law, specifies, as applicable, that the defendant or defendants
intentionally selected the person against whom the offense was committed
or intended to be committed; or intentionally committed the act or acts
constituting the offense, in whole or in substantial part because of a
belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin,
ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious
practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of a person; and
(d) in the case of a crime of terrorism, as defined in section 490.25
of the penal law, specifies, as applicable, that the defendant or
defendants acted with intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian
population, influence the policy of a unit of government by intimidation
or coercion, or affect the conduct of a unit of government by murder,
assassination or kidnapping; and
(e) in the case of a sexually motivated felony, as defined in section
130.91 of the penal law, asserts facts supporting the allegation that
the offense was sexually motivated; and
8. The signature of the foreman or acting foreman of the grand jury,
except where the indictment has been ordered reduced pursuant to
subdivision one-a of section 210.20 of this chapter or the accusatory
instrument is a superior court information; and
9. The signature of the district attorney.
Indictment; allegations of previous convictions prohibited.
1. When the fact that the defendant has been previously convicted of
an offense raises an offense of lower grade to one of higher grade and
thereby becomes an element of the latter, an indictment for such higher
offense may not allege such previous conviction. If a reference to
previous conviction is contained in the statutory name or title of such
an offense, such name or title may not be used in the indictment, but an
improvised name or title must be used which, by means of the phrase "as
a felony" or in some other manner, labels and distinguishes the offense
without reference to a previous conviction. This subdivision does not
apply to an indictment or a count thereof that charges escape in the
second degree pursuant to subdivision two of section 205.10 of the penal
law, or escape in the first degree pursuant to section 205.15 thereof.
2. An indictment for such an offense must be accompanied by a special
information, filed by the district attorney with the court, charging
that the defendant was previously convicted of a specified offense.
Except as provided in subdivision three, the people may not refer to
such special information during the trial nor adduce any evidence
concerning the previous conviction alleged therein.
3. After commencement of the trial and before the close of the
people's case, the court, in the absence of the jury, must arraign the
defendant upon such special information, and must advise him that he may
admit the previous conviction alleged, deny it or remain mute.
Depending upon the defendant's response, the trial of the indictment
must then proceed as follows:
(a) If the defendant admits the previous conviction, that element of
the offense charged in the indictment is deemed established, no evidence
in support thereof may be adduced by the people, and the court must
submit the case to the jury without reference thereto and as if the fact
of such previous conviction were not an element of the offense. The
court may not submit to the jury any lesser included offense which is
distinguished from the offense charged solely by the fact that a
previous conviction is not an element thereof.
(b) If the defendant denies the previous conviction or remains mute,
the people may prove that element of the offense charged before the jury
as a part of their case. In any prosecution under subparagraph (ix) of
paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 125.27 of the penal law, if
the defendant denies the previous murder conviction or remains mute, the
people may prove that element of the offense only after the jury has
first found the defendant guilty of intentionally causing the death of a
person as charged in the indictment, in which case the court shall then
permit the people and the defendant to offer evidence and argument
consistent with the relevant provisions of section 260.30 of this
chapter with respect to the previous murder conviction.
4. Nothing contained in this section precludes the people from proving
a prior conviction before a grand jury or relieves them from the
obligation or necessity of so doing in order to submit a legally
sufficient case.
Indictment; special information for operators of for-hire
vehicles.
1. The provisions of this section shall govern the procedures for
determining whether a defendant is eligible to receive the sentence set
forth in subdivision one of section 60.07 of the penal law upon
conviction of a specified offense as defined in subdivision two of such
section 60.07.
2. To receive the sentence set forth in subdivision one of section
60.07 of the penal law, an indictment for such specified offense must be
accompanied by a special information, filed by the district attorney
with the court, alleging that the victim of such offense was operating a
for-hire vehicle in the course of providing for-hire vehicle services at
the time of the commission of such offense.
3. Prior to the commencement of the trial, the court, in the absence
of the jury, must arraign the defendant upon such special information,
and must advise him that he may admit that the alleged victim of such
offense was operating a for-hire vehicle in the course of providing
for-hire vehicle services at the time of the alleged commission of such
offense, deny such allegation or remain mute. Depending upon the
defendant's response, the trial of the indictment must proceed as
follows:
(a) If the defendant admits that the alleged victim of such specified
offense charged was operating a for-hire vehicle in the course of
providing for-hire vehicle services at the time of the commission of
such alleged offense, such allegation, and only such allegation, shall
be deemed established for purposes of eligibility, if the defendant is
convicted of the underlying specified offense, for a sentence pursuant
to subdivision one of section 60.07 of the penal law.
(b) If the defendant denies such allegation or remains mute, the
people may, by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, prove as part of their
case before the jury or, where the defendant has waived a jury trial,
the court, that the alleged victim of such offense was operating a
for-hire vehicle in the course of providing for-hire vehicle services at
the time of the commission of the offense.
4. Where a jury, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision three of
this section, is charged with determining whether the alleged victim of
such specified offense was operating a for-hire vehicle in the course of
providing for-hire vehicle services, such jury shall consider and render
its verdict on such matter only if it convicts the defendant of such
specified offense or specified offenses charged.
5. For purposes of this section, the terms "for-hire vehicle",
"for-hire vehicle services" and "specified offense" shall have the
meanings set forth in section 60.07 of the penal law.
Indictment; special information for child sexual assault
offender.
1. Whenever a person is charged with the commission or attempted
commission of an offense defined in article one hundred thirty of the
penal law which constitutes a felony and it appears that the victim of
such offense was less than fifteen years old, an indictment for such
offense may be accompanied by a special information, filed by the
district attorney with the court, alleging that the victim was less than
fifteen years old at the time of the commission of the offense;
provided, however, that such an information need not be filed when the
age of the victim is an element of the offense.
2. Prior to trial, or after the commencement of the trial but before
the close of the people's case, the court, in the absence of the jury,
must arraign the defendant upon such information and advise him or her
that he or she may admit such allegation, deny it or remain mute.
Depending upon the defendant's response, the trial of the indictment
must proceed as follows:
(a) If the defendant admits that the alleged victim was less than
fifteen years old at the time of the commission or attempted commission
of the offense, that allegation shall be deemed established for all
subsequent purposes, including sentencing pursuant to section 70.07 of
the penal law.
(b) If the defendant denies such allegation or remains mute, the
people may, by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, prove before the jury
or, where the defendant has waived a jury trial, the court, that the
alleged victim was less than fifteen years old at the time of the
commission or attempted commission of the offense.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision shall prevent the people, in a trial
before the court or a jury, from making reference to and introducing
evidence of the victim's age.
3. Where a jury, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision two of this
section, makes the determination of whether the alleged victim of the
offense was less than fifteen years old, such jury shall consider and
render its verdict on such issue only after rendering its verdict with
regard to the offense.
4. A determination pursuant to this section that the victim was less
than fifteen years old at the time of the commission of the offense
shall be binding in any future proceeding in which the issue may arise
unless the underlying conviction or determination is vacated or
reversed.
Indictment; special information for aggravated family offense.
1. Whenever a person is charged with the commission or attempted
commission of an aggravated family offense as defined in section 240.75
of the penal law, an indictment or information for such offense shall be
accompanied by a special information, filed by the district attorney
with the court, alleging that the defendant was previously convicted of
a specified offense as defined in subdivision two of section 240.75 of
the penal law, that at the time of the previous offense the defendant
and the person against whom the offense was committed were members of
the same family or household as defined in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this chapter, and that such previous conviction took place
within the time period specified in subdivision one of section 240.75 of
the penal law. Except as provided herein, the people may not refer to
such special information during trial nor adduce any evidence concerning
the allegations therein.
2. Prior to the commencement of the trial, the court, in the absence
of the jury, must arraign the defendant upon such information and advise
him or her that he or she may admit each such allegation, deny any such
allegation or remain mute with respect to any such allegation. Depending
upon the defendant's response, the trial of the indictment or
information must then proceed as follows:
(a)(i) If the previous conviction is for an aggravated family offense
as defined in section 240.75 of the penal law, and the defendant admits
the previous conviction or that it took place within the time period
specified in subdivision one of section 240.75 of the penal law, such
admitted allegation or allegations shall be deemed established for the
purposes of the present prosecution, including sentencing pursuant to
section 70.00 of the penal law. The court must submit the case to the
jury as if such admitted allegation or allegations were not elements of
the offense.
(ii) If the defendant denies the previous conviction or remains mute
with respect to it, the people may prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that element of the offense before the jury as a part of their case.
(iii) If the defendant denies that the previous conviction took place
within the time period specified in subdivision one of section 240.75 of
the penal law, or remains mute with respect to that matter, the people
may prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, before the jury as part of their
case, that the previous conviction took place within the time period
specified.
(b)(i) If the previous conviction is for a specified offense as
defined in subdivision two of section 240.75 of the penal law, other
than an aggravated family offense, and the defendant admits such
previous conviction, that it took place within the time period specified
in subdivision one of section 240.75 of the penal law, or that the
defendant and the person against whom the offense was committed were
members of the same family or household as defined in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this chapter, such admitted allegation or allegations
shall be deemed established for the purposes of the present prosecution,
including sentencing pursuant to section 70.00 of the penal law. The
court must submit the case to the jury as if the admitted allegation or
allegations were not elements of the offense.
(ii) If the defendant denies the previous conviction or remains mute
with respect to it, the people may prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that element of the offense before the jury as a part of their case.
(iii) If the defendant denies that the previous conviction took place
within the time period specified in subdivision one of section 240.75 of
the penal law, or remains mute with respect to that matter, the people
may prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, before the jury as part of their
case, that the previous conviction took place within the time period
specified.
(iv) If the defendant denies that the defendant and the person against
whom the previous offense was committed were members of the same family
or household as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter, or remains mute with respect to that matter, the people may
prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that element of the offense before the
jury as a part of their case.
Indictment; special information for enterprise corruption and
criminal possession or use of a biological weapon or chemical
weapon.
When filing an indictment which charges enterprise corruption in
violation of article four hundred sixty of the penal law, criminal
possession of a chemical weapon or biological weapon in violation of
section 490.37, 490.40, or 490.45 of the penal law, or criminal use of a
chemical weapon or biological weapon in violation of section 490.47,
490.50, or 490.55 of the penal law, the district attorney must submit a
statement to the court attesting that he or she has reviewed the
substance of the evidence presented to the grand jury and concurs in the
judgment that the charge is consistent with legislative findings in
article four hundred sixty or four hundred ninety of the penal law, as
applicable. For purposes of this section only, "district attorney" means
the district attorney of the county, the attorney general, or the deputy
attorney general in charge of the organized crime task force, or where
such person is actually absent or disabled, the person authorized to act
in his or her stead.
Indictment; amendment of.
1. At any time before or during trial, the court may, upon application
of the people and with notice to the defendant and opportunity to be
heard, order the amendment of an indictment with respect to defects,
errors or variances from the proof relating to matters of form, time,
place, names of persons and the like, when such an amendment does not
change the theory or theories of the prosecution as reflected in the
evidence before the grand jury which filed such indictment, or otherwise
tend to prejudice the defendant on the merits. Where the accusatory
instrument is a superior court information, such an amendment may be
made when it does not tend to prejudice the defendant on the merits.
Upon permitting such an amendment, the court must, upon application of
the defendant, order any adjournment of the proceedings which may, by
reason of such amendment, be necessary to accord the defendant adequate
opportunity to prepare his defense.
2. An indictment may not be amended in any respect which changes the
theory or theories of the prosecution as reflected in the evidence
before the grand jury which filed it; nor may an indictment or superior
court information be amended for the purpose of curing:
(a) A failure thereof to charge or state an offense; or
(b) Legal insufficiency of the factual allegations; or
(c) A misjoinder of offenses; or
(d) A misjoinder of defendants.
Indictment; superseding indictments.
If at any time before entry of a plea of guilty to an indictment or
commencement of a trial thereof another indictment is filed in the same
court charging the defendant with an offense charged in the first
indictment, the first indictment is, with respect to such offense,
superseded by the second and, upon the defendant's arraignment upon the
second indictment, the count of the first indictment charging such
offense must be dismissed by the court. The first indictment is not,
however, superseded with respect to any count contained therein which
charges an offense not charged in the second indictment. Nothing herein
precludes the filing of a superseding indictment when the first
accusatory instrument is a superior court information.
Indictment; bill of particulars.
1. Definitions. (a) "Bill of particulars" is a written statement by
the prosecutor specifying, as required by this section, items of factual
information which are not recited in the indictment and which pertain to
the offense charged and including the substance of each defendant's
conduct encompassed by the charge which the people intend to prove at
trial on their direct case, and whether the people intend to prove that
the defendant acted as principal or accomplice or both, and items of
factual information which are not recited in a special forfeiture
information or prosecutor's forfeiture information containing one or
more forfeiture counts and which pertain to the substance of each
defendant's conduct giving rise to the forfeiture claim, the approximate
value of property for which forfeiture is sought, the nature and extent
of the defendant's interest in such property, and the extent of the
defendant's gain, if any, from the offense charged. However, the
prosecutor shall not be required to include in the bill of particulars
matters of evidence relating to how the people intend to prove the
elements of the offense charged or how the people intend to prove any
item of factual information included in the bill of particulars.
(b) "Request for a bill of particulars" is a written request served by
defendant upon the people, without leave of the court, requesting a bill
of particulars, specifying the items of factual information desired, and
alleging that defendant cannot adequately prepare or conduct his defense
without the information requested.
2. Bill of particulars upon request. Upon a timely request for a bill
of particulars by a defendant against whom an indictment is pending, the
prosecutor shall within fifteen days of the service of the request or as
soon thereafter as is practicable, serve upon the defendant or his
attorney, and file with the court, the bill of particulars, except to
the extent the prosecutor shall have refused to comply with the request
pursuant to subdivision four of this section.
3. Timeliness of request. A request for a bill of particulars shall be
timely if made within thirty days after arraignment and before the
commencement of trial. If the defendant is not represented by counsel,
and has requested an adjournment to obtain counsel or to have counsel
assigned, the thirty day period shall commence, for the purposes of a
request for a bill of particulars by the defendant, on the date counsel
initially appears on his behalf. However, the court may direct
compliance with a request for a bill of particulars that, for good cause
shown, could not have been made within the time specified.
4. Request refused. The prosecutor may refuse to comply with the
request for a bill of particulars or any portion of the request for a
bill of particulars to the extent he reasonably believes that the item
of factual information requested is not authorized to be included in a
bill of particulars, or that such information is not necessary to enable
the defendant adequately to prepare or conduct his defense, or that a
protective order would be warranted or that the demand is untimely. Such
refusal shall be made in a writing, which shall set forth the grounds of
such belief as fully as possible, consistent with the reason for the
refusal. Within fifteen days of the request or as soon thereafter as
practicable, the refusal shall be served upon the defendant and a copy
shall be filed with the court.
5. Court ordered bill of particulars. Where a prosecutor has timely
served a written refusal pursuant to subdivision four of this section
and upon motion, made in writing, of a defendant, who has made a request
for a bill of particulars and whose request has not been complied with
in whole or in part, the court must, to the extent a protective order is
not warranted, order the prosecutor to comply with the request if it is
satisfied that the items of factual information requested are authorized
to be included in a bill of particulars, and that such information is
necessary to enable the defendant adequately to prepare or conduct his
defense and, if the request was untimely, a finding of good cause for
the delay. Where a prosecutor has not timely served a written refusal
pursuant to subdivision four of this section the court must, unless it
is satisfied that the people have shown good cause why such an order
should not be issued, issue an order requiring the prosecutor to comply
or providing for any other order authorized by section 245.80 of this
part.
6. Motion procedure. A motion for a bill of particulars shall be made
as prescribed in section 255.20. Upon an order granting a motion
pursuant to this section, the prosecutor must file with the court a bill
of particulars, reciting every item of information designated in the
order, and serve a copy thereof upon the defendant. Pending such filing
and service, the proceedings are stayed.
7. Protective order. (a) The court in which the criminal action is
pending may, upon motion of the prosecutor, or of any affected person,
or upon determination of a motion of defendant for a court ordered bill
of particulars, or upon its own initiative, issue a protective order
denying, limiting, conditioning, delaying or regulating the bill of
particulars for good cause, including constitutional limitations, danger
to the integrity of physical evidence or a substantial risk of physical
harm, intimidation, economic reprisal, bribery or unjustified annoyance
or embarrassment to any person or an adverse effect upon the legitimate
needs of law enforcement, including the protection of the
confidentiality of informants, or any other factor or set of factors
which outweighs the need for the bill of particulars.
(b) An order limiting, conditioning, delaying or regulating the bill
of particulars may, among other things, require that any material copied
or derived therefrom be maintained in the exclusive possession of the
attorney for the defendant and be used for the exclusive purpose of
preparing for the defense of the criminal action.
8. Amendment. At any time before commencement of trial, the prosecutor
may, without leave of the court, serve upon defendant and file with the
court an amended bill of particulars. At any time during trial, upon
application of the prosecutor and with notice to the defendant and an
opportunity for him to be heard, the court must, upon finding that no
undue prejudice will accrue to defendant and that the prosecutor has
acted in good faith, permit the prosecutor to amend the bill of
particulars. Upon any amendment of the bill of particulars, the court
must, upon application of defendant, order an adjournment of the
proceedings or any other action it deems appropriate which may, by
reason of the amendment, be necessary to accord the defendant an
adequate opportunity to defend.
ARTICLE 210 Proceedings In Superior Court From Filing of Indictment to Plea
Indictment and superior court information exclusive methods of
prosecution.
The only methods of prosecuting an offense in a superior court are by
an indictment filed therewith by a grand jury or by a superior court
information filed therewith by a district attorney.
Requirement of and methods of securing defendant's appearance
for arraignment upon indictment.
After an indictment has been filed with a superior court, the
defendant must be arraigned thereon. He must appear personally at such
arraignment, and his appearance may be secured as follows: 1. If the
defendant was previously held by a local criminal court for the action
of the grand jury, and if he is confined in the custody of the sheriff
pursuant to a previous court order issued in the same criminal action,
the superior court must direct the sheriff to produce the defendant for
arraignment on a specified date and the sheriff must comply with such
direction. The court must give at least two days notice of the time and
place of the arraignment to an attorney, if any, who has previously
filed a notice of appearance in behalf of the defendant with such
superior court, or if no such notice of appearance has been filed, to an
attorney, if any, who filed a notice of appearance in behalf of the
defendant with the local criminal court.
2. If a felony complaint against the defendant was pending in a local
criminal court or if the defendant was previously held by a local
criminal court for the action of the grand jury, and if the defendant is
at liberty on his or her own recognizance or on bail pursuant to a
previous court order issued in the same criminal action, the superior
court must, upon at least two days notice to the defendant and his or
her surety, to any person other than the defendant who posted cash bail
and to any attorney who would be entitled to notice under circumstances
prescribed in subdivision one, direct the defendant to appear before the
superior court for arraignment on a specified date. If the defendant
fails to appear on such date, the court may issue a bench warrant and,
in addition, may forfeit the bail, if any. Upon taking the defendant
into custody pursuant to such bench warrant, the executing police
officer must without unnecessary delay bring the defendant before such
superior court for arraignment. If such superior court is not available,
the executing police officer may bring the defendant to the local
correctional facility of the county in which such superior court sits,
to be detained there until not later than the commencement of the next
session of such court occurring on the next business day.
3. If the defendant has not previously been held by a local criminal
court for the action of the grand jury and the filing of the indictment
constituted the commencement of the criminal action, the superior court
must order the indictment to be filed as a sealed instrument until the
defendant is produced or appears for arraignment, and must issue a
superior court warrant of arrest. Upon the request of the district
attorney, in lieu of a superior court warrant of arrest, the court may
issue a summons if it is satisfied that the defendant will respond
thereto. Upon the request of the district attorney, in lieu of a warrant
of arrest or summons, the court may instead authorize the district
attorney to direct the defendant to appear for arraignment on a
designated date if it is satisfied that the defendant will so appear. A
superior court warrant of arrest is executable anywhere in the state.
Such warrant may be addressed to any police officer whose geographical
area of employment embraces either the place where the offense charged
was allegedly committed or the locality of the court by which the
warrant is issued. It must be executed in the same manner as an
ordinary warrant of arrest, as provided in section 120.80, and following
the arrest the executing police officer must without unnecessary delay
perform all recording, fingerprinting, photographing and other
preliminary police duties required in the particular case, and bring the
defendant before the superior court. If such superior court is not
available, the executing police officer may bring the defendant to the
local correctional facility of the county in which such superior court
sits, to be detained there until not later than the commencement of the
next session of such court occurring on the next business day.
4. A superior court warrant of arrest may be executed by (a) any
police officer to whom it is addressed or (b) any other police officer
delegated to execute it under circumstances prescribed in subdivisions
five and six.
5. The issuing court may authorize the delegation of such warrant.
Where the issuing court has so authorized, a police officer to whom a
superior court warrant of arrest is addressed may delegate another
police officer to whom it is not addressed to execute such warrant as
his agent when:
(a) He has reasonable cause to believe that the defendant is in a
particular county other than the one in which the warrant is returnable;
and
(b) The geographical area of employment of the delegated police
officer embraces the locality where the arrest is to be made.
6. Under circumstances specified in subdivision five, the police
officer to whom the warrant is addressed may inform the delegated
officer, by telecommunication, mail or any other means, of the issuance
of the warrant, of the offense charged in the underlying accusatory
instrument and of all other pertinent details, and may request such
officer to act as his or her agent in arresting the defendant pursuant
to such warrant. Upon such request, the delegated police officer is to
the same extent as the delegating officer, authorized to make such
arrest pursuant to the warrant within the geographical area of such
delegated officer's employment. Upon so arresting the defendant, he or
she must without unnecessary delay deliver the defendant or cause the
defendant to be delivered to the custody of the police officer by whom
he or she was so delegated, and the latter must then without unnecessary
delay bring the defendant before a court in which such warrant is
returnable. If such court is not available, the delegating officer may
bring the defendant to the local correctional facility of the county in
which such court sits, to be detained there until not later than the
commencement of the next session of such court occurring on the next
business day.
Arraignment upon indictment; defendant's rights, court's
instructions and bail matters.
1. Upon the defendant's arraignment before a superior court upon an
indictment, the court must immediately inform him, or cause him to be
informed in its presence, of the charge or charges against him, and the
district attorney must cause him to be furnished with a copy of the
indictment.
2. The defendant has a right to the aid of counsel at the arraignment
and at every subsequent stage of the action, and, if he appears upon
such arraignment without counsel, has the following rights:
(a) To an adjournment for the purpose of obtaining counsel; and
(b) To communicate, free of charge, by letter or by telephone provided
by the law enforcement facility where the defendant is held to a phone
number located in the United States or Puerto Rico, for the purposes of
obtaining counsel and informing a relative or friend that he or she has
been charged with an offense; and
(c) To have counsel assigned by the court in any case where he is
financially unable to obtain the same.
3. The court must inform the defendant of all rights specified in
subdivision two. The court must accord the defendant opportunity to
exercise such rights and must itself take such affirmative action as is
necessary to effectuate them.
5. If the defendant desires to proceed without the aid of counsel, the
court must permit him to do so if it is satisfied that he made such
decision with knowledge of the significance thereof, but if it is not so
satisfied it may not proceed until the defendant is provided with
counsel, either of his own choosing or by assignment. A defendant who
proceeds at the arraignment without counsel does not waive his right to
counsel, and the court must inform him that he continues to have such
right as well as all the rights specified in subdivision two which are
necessary to effectuate it, and that he may exercise such rights at any
stage of the action.
6. Upon the arraignment, the court, unless it intends to make a final
disposition of the action immediately thereafter, must, as provided in
section 530.40, issue a securing order, releasing the defendant on his
own recognizance or fixing bail or committing him to the custody of the
sheriff for his future appearance in such action.
Requirement of HIV related testing in certain cases.
1. (a) In a case where an indictment or a superior court information
has been filed with a superior court which charges the defendant with a
felony offense enumerated in any section of article one hundred thirty
of the penal law where an act of "vaginal sexual contact", "oral sexual
contact" or "anal sexual contact," as those terms are defined in section
130.00 of the penal law, is required as an essential element for the
commission thereof, the court shall, upon a request of the victim within
six months of the date of the crimes charged, order that the defendant
submit to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) related testing. Testing of
a defendant shall be ordered when the result would provide medical
benefit to the victim or a psychological benefit to the victim. Medical
benefit shall be found when the following elements are satisfied: (i) a
decision is pending about beginning, continuing, or discontinuing a
medical intervention for the victim; and (ii) the result of an HIV test
of the accused could affect that decision, and could provide relevant
information beyond that which would be provided by an HIV test of the
victim. If testing the defendant would provide medical benefit to the
victim or a psychological benefit to the victim, then the testing is to
be conducted by a state, county, or local public health officer
designated by the order. Test results, which shall not be disclosed to
the court, shall be communicated to the defendant and the victim named
in the order in accordance with the provisions of section twenty-seven
hundred eighty-five-a of the public health law.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the terms "victim" and
"applicant" mean the person with whom the defendant is charged to have
engaged in an act of "vaginal sexual contact", "oral sexual contact" or
"anal sexual contact", as those terms are defined in section 130.00 of
the penal law, where such conduct with such victim was the basis for
charging the defendant with an offense specified in paragraph (a) of
this subdivision.
2. Any request made by the victim pursuant to this section must be in
writing, filed with the court within six months of the date of the
crimes charged, and provided by the court to the defendant or his or her
counsel. The request must be filed with the court prior to or within
forty-eight hours after the indictment or superior court information has
been filed with the superior court; provided however that, for good
cause shown, the court may permit such request to be filed at a later
stage of the action within six months of the date of the crimes charged.
3. At any stage in the action within six months of the date of the
crimes charged, prior to the final disposition of the indictment or
superior court information and while the defendant is charged with an
offense specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of this section,
the victim may request that the defendant submit to a follow-up HIV
related test. Such request must be in writing, filed with the court and
provided by the court to the defendant or his or her counsel. Upon a
finding that the follow-up HIV related test is medically appropriate the
court must order that the defendant submit to such test. The court shall
not make such finding of medical appropriateness unless the follow-up
HIV related test is to be administered a sufficient time after the
charged offense to be consistent with guidelines that may be issued by
the commissioner of health. There shall be no more than one follow-up
HIV related test absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
4. Any requests, related papers and orders made or filed pursuant to
this section, together with any papers or proceedings related thereto,
shall be sealed by the court and not made available for any purpose,
except as may be necessary for the conduct of judicial proceedings
directly related to the provisions of this section. All proceedings on
such requests shall be held in camera.
5. The application for an order to compel a defendant to undergo an
HIV related test may be made by the victim but, if the victim is an
infant or incompetent person, the application may also be made by a
representative as defined in section twelve hundred one of the civil
practice law and rules. The application must state that: (a) the
applicant was the victim of the offense enumerated in paragraph (a) of
subdivision one of this section of which the defendant is charged; and
(b) the applicant has been offered pre-HIV test counseling and post-HIV
test counseling by a public health officer in accordance with article
twenty-seven-F of the public health law and has been advised, in
accordance with any guidelines that may be issued by the commissioner of
health, of (i) the limitations on the information to be obtained through
an HIV test on the proposed subject; (ii) current scientific assessments
of the risk of transmission of HIV from the exposure he or she may have
experienced; and (iii) the need for the applicant to undergo HIV related
testing to definitively determine his or her HIV status.
6. The court shall conduct a hearing only if necessary to determine if
the applicant is the victim of the offense of which the defendant is
charged or to determine whether a follow-up test is medically
appropriate. The court ordered test must be performed within forty-eight
hours of the date on which the court ordered the test, provided,
however, that whenever the defendant is not tested within the period
prescribed by the court, the court must again order that the defendant
undergo an HIV related test. The defendant shall be advised of
information as to HIV testing and medical treatment in accordance with
any guidelines that may be issued by the commissioner of health.
7. (a) Test results shall be disclosed subject to the following
limitations, which shall be specified in any order issued pursuant to
this section:
(i) disclosure of confidential HIV related information shall be
limited to that information which is necessary to fulfill the purpose
for which the order is granted; and
(ii) disclosure of confidential HIV related information shall be made
to the defendant upon his or her request, and disclosure to a person
other than the defendant shall be limited to the person making the
application; redisclosure shall be permitted only to the victim, the
victim's immediate family, guardian, physicians, attorneys, medical or
mental health providers and to his or her past and future contacts to
whom there was or is a reasonable risk of HIV transmission and shall not
be permitted to any other person or the court.
(b) Unless inconsistent with this section, the court's order shall
direct compliance with and conform to the provisions of article
twenty-seven-F of the public health law. Such order shall include
measures to protect against disclosure to others of the identity and HIV
status of the applicant and of the person tested and may include such
other measures as the court deems necessary to protect confidential
information.
8. Any failure to comply with the provisions of this section or
section twenty-seven hundred eighty-five-a of the public health law
shall not impair or affect the validity of any proceeding upon the
indictment or superior court information.
9. No information obtained as a result of a consent, hearing or court
order for testing issued pursuant to this section nor any information
derived therefrom may be used as evidence in any criminal or civil
proceeding against the defendant which relates to events that were the
basis for charging the defendant with an offense enumerated in paragraph
(a) of subdivision one of this section, provided however that nothing in
this section shall prevent prosecution of a witness testifying in any
court hearing held pursuant to this section for perjury pursuant to
article two hundred ten of the penal law.
Motion to dismiss or reduce indictment.
1. After arraignment upon an indictment, the superior court may, upon
motion of the defendant, dismiss such indictment or any count thereof
upon the ground that:
(a) Such indictment or count is defective, within the meaning of
section 210.25; or
(b) The evidence before the grand jury was not legally sufficient to
establish the offense charged or any lesser included offense; or
(c) The grand jury proceeding was defective, within the meaning of
section 210.35; or
(d) The defendant has immunity with respect to the offense charged,
pursuant to section 50.20 or 190.40; or
(e) The prosecution is barred by reason of a previous prosecution,
pursuant to section 40.20; or
(f) The prosecution is untimely, pursuant to section 30.10; or
(g) The defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial; or
(h) There exists some other jurisdictional or legal impediment to
conviction of the defendant for the offense charged; or
(i) Dismissal is required in the interest of justice, pursuant to
section 210.40.
1-a. After arraignment upon an indictment, if the superior court, upon
motion of the defendant pursuant to this subdivision or paragraph b of
subdivision one of this section challenging the legal sufficiency of the
evidence before the grand jury, finds that the evidence before the grand
jury was not legally sufficient to establish the commission by the
defendant of the offense charged in any count contained within the
indictment, but was legally sufficient to establish the commission of a
lesser included offense, it shall order the count or counts of the
indictment with respect to which the finding is made reduced to allege
the most serious lesser included offense with respect to which the
evidence before the grand jury was sufficient, except that where the
most serious lesser included offense thus found is a petty offense, and
the court does not find evidence of the commission of any crime in any
other count of the indictment, it shall order the indictment dismissed
and a prosecutor's information charging the petty offense filed in the
appropriate local criminal court. The motion to dismiss or reduce any
count of an indictment based on legal insufficiency to establish the
offense charged shall be made in accordance with the procedure set forth
in subdivisions one through seven of section 210.45, provided however,
the court shall state on the record the basis for its determination.
Upon entering an order pursuant to this subdivision, the court shall
consider the appropriateness of any securing order issued pursuant to
article 510 of this chapter.
2. A motion pursuant to this section, except a motion pursuant to
paragraph (g) of subdivision one, should be made within the period
provided in section 255.20. A motion made pursuant to paragraph (g) of
subdivision one must be made prior to the commencement of trial or entry
of a plea of guilty.
3. Upon the motion, a defendant who is in a position adequately to
raise more than one ground in support thereof should raise every such
ground upon which he intends to challenge the indictment. A subsequent
motion based upon any such ground not so raised may be summarily denied,
although the court, in the interest of justice and for good cause shown,
may in its discretion entertain and dispose of such a motion on the
merits notwithstanding.
4. Upon dismissing an indictment or a count thereof upon any of the
grounds specified in paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (i) of subdivision
one, or, upon dismissing a superior court information or a count thereof
upon any of the grounds specified in paragraphs (a) or (i) of
subdivision one, the court may, upon application of the people, in its
discretion authorize the people to submit the charge or charges to the
same or another grand jury. When the dismissal is based upon some other
ground, such authorization may not be granted. In the absence of
authorization to submit or resubmit, the order of dismissal constitutes
a bar to any further prosecution of such charge or charges, by
indictment or otherwise, in any criminal court within the county.
5. If the court dismisses one or more counts of an indictment, against
a defendant who was under the age of sixteen at the time of the
commission of the crime and who did not lack criminal responsibility for
such crime by reason of infancy, and one or more other counts of the
indictment having been joined in the indictment solely with the
dismissed count pursuant to subdivision six of section 200.20 is not
dismissed, the court must direct that such count be removed to the
family court in accordance with article seven hundred twenty-five of
this chapter.
6. The effectiveness of an order reducing a count or counts of an
indictment or dismissing an indictment and directing the filing of a
prosecutor's information or dismissing a count or counts of an
indictment charging murder in the first degree shall be stayed for
thirty days following the entry of such order unless such stay is
otherwise waived by the people. On or before the conclusion of such
thirty-day period, the people shall exercise one of the following
options:
(a) Accept the court's order by filing a reduced indictment, by
dismissing the indictment and filing a prosecutor's information, or by
filing an indictment containing any count or counts remaining after
dismissal of the count or counts charging murder in the first degree, as
appropriate;
(b) Resubmit the subject count or counts to the same or a different
grand jury within thirty days of the entry of the order or such
additional time as the court may permit upon a showing of good cause;
provided, however, that if in such case an order is again entered with
respect to such count or counts pursuant to subdivision one-a of this
section, such count or counts may not again be submitted to a grand
jury. Where the people exercise this option, the effectiveness of the
order further shall be stayed pending a determination by the grand jury
and the filing of a new indictment, if voted, charging the resubmitted
count or counts;
(c) Appeal the order pursuant to subdivision one or one-a of section
450.20. Where the people exercise this option, the effectiveness of the
order further shall be stayed in accordance with the provisions of
subdivision two of section 460.40.
If the people fail to exercise one of the foregoing options, the
court's order shall take effect and the people shall comply with
paragraph (a) of this subdivision.
Motion to dismiss indictment; as defective.
An indictment or a count thereof is defective within the meaning of
paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 210.20 when:
1. It does not substantially conform to the requirements stated in
article two hundred; provided that an indictment may not be dismissed as
defective, but must instead be amended, where the defect or irregularity
is of a kind that may be cured by amendment, pursuant to section 200.70,
and where the people move to so amend; or
2. The allegations demonstrate that the court does not have
jurisdiction of the offense charged; or
3. The statute defining the offense charged is unconstitutional or
otherwise invalid.
Motion to dismiss or reduce indictment on ground of
insufficiency of grand jury evidence; motion to inspect grand
jury minutes.
1. A motion to dismiss an indictment or a count thereof pursuant to
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 210.20 or a motion to reduce
a count or counts of an indictment pursuant to subdivision one-a of
section 210.20 must be preceded or accompanied by a motion to inspect
the grand jury minutes, as prescribed in subdivision two of this
section.
2. A motion to inspect grand jury minutes is a motion by a defendant
requesting an examination by the court and the defendant of the
stenographic minutes of a grand jury proceeding resulting in an
indictment for the purpose of determining whether the evidence before
the grand jury was legally sufficient to support the charges or a charge
contained in such indictment.
3. Unless good cause exists to deny the motion to inspect the grand
jury minutes, the court must grant the motion. It must then proceed to
examine the minutes and to determine the motion to dismiss or reduce the
indictment. If the court, after examining the minutes, finds that
release of the minutes, or certain portions thereof, to the parties is
necessary to assist the court in making its determination on the motion,
it may release the minutes or such portions thereof to the parties.
Provided, however, such release shall be limited to that grand jury
testimony which is relevant to a determination of whether the evidence
before the grand jury was legally sufficient to support a charge or
charges contained in such indictment. Prior to such release the district
attorney shall be given an opportunity to present argument to the court
that the release of the minutes, or any portion thereof, would not be in
the public interest. For purposes of this section, the minutes shall
include any materials submitted to the grand jury pursuant to
subdivision eight of section 190.30 of this chapter.
4. If the court determines that there is not reasonable cause to
believe that the evidence before the grand jury may have been legally
insufficient, it may in its discretion either (a) deny both the motion
to inspect and the motion to dismiss or reduce, or (b) grant the motion
to inspect notwithstanding and proceed to examine the minutes and to
determine the motion to dismiss or reduce.
5. In any case, the court must place on the record its ruling upon the
motion to inspect.
6. The validity of an order denying any motion made pursuant to this
section is not reviewable upon an appeal from an ensuing judgment of
conviction based upon legally sufficient trial evidence.
7. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, where the indictment is
filed against a juvenile offender or adolescent offender, the court
shall dismiss the indictment or count thereof where the evidence before
the grand jury was not legally sufficient to establish the offense
charged or any lesser included offense for which the defendant is
criminally responsible. Upon such dismissal, unless the court shall
authorize the people to resubmit the charge to a subsequent grand jury,
and upon a finding that there was sufficient evidence to believe
defendant is a juvenile delinquent as defined in subdivision (a) of
section seven hundred twelve of the family court act and upon specifying
the act or acts it found sufficient evidence to believe defendant
committed, the court may direct that such matter be removed to family
court in accordance with the provisions of article seven hundred
twenty-five of this chapter.
Motion to dismiss indictment; defective grand jury proceeding.
A grand jury proceeding is defective within the meaning of paragraph
(c) of subdivision one of section 210.20 when:
1. The grand jury was illegally constituted; or
2. The proceeding is conducted before fewer than sixteen grand
jurors; or
3. Fewer than twelve grand jurors concur in the finding of the
indictment; or
4. The defendant is not accorded an opportunity to appear and testify
before the grand jury in accordance with the provisions of section
190.50; or
5. The proceeding otherwise fails to conform to the requirements of
article one hundred ninety to such degree that the integrity thereof is
impaired and prejudice to the defendant may result.
Motion to dismiss indictment; in furtherance of justice.
1. An indictment or any count thereof may be dismissed in furtherance
of justice, as provided in paragraph (i) of subdivision one of section
210.20, when, even though there may be no basis for dismissal as a
matter of law upon any ground specified in paragraphs (a) through (h) of
said subdivision one of section 210.20, such dismissal is required as a
matter of judicial discretion by the existence of some compelling
factor, consideration or circumstance clearly demonstrating that
conviction or prosecution of the defendant upon such indictment or count
would constitute or result in injustice. In determining whether such
compelling factor, consideration, or circumstance exists, the court
must, to the extent applicable, examine and consider, individually and
collectively, the following:
(a) the seriousness and circumstances of the offense;
(b) the extent of harm caused by the offense;
(c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at
trial;
(d) the history, character and condition of the defendant;
(e) any exceptionally serious misconduct of law enforcement personnel
in the investigation, arrest and prosecution of the defendant;
(f) the purpose and effect of imposing upon the defendant a sentence
authorized for the offense;
(g) the impact of a dismissal upon the confidence of the public in
the criminal justice system;
(h) the impact of a dismissal on the safety or welfare of the
community;
(i) where the court deems it appropriate, the attitude of the
complainant or victim with respect to the motion;
(j) any other relevant fact indicating that a judgment of conviction
would serve no useful purpose.
2. In addition to the grounds specified in subdivision one of this
section, a count alleging enterprise corruption in violation of article
four hundred sixty of the penal law may be dismissed in the interest of
justice where prosecution of that count is inconsistent with the stated
legislative findings in said article. Upon a motion pursuant to this
section, the court must inspect the evidence before the grand jury and
such other evidence or information as it may deem proper.
3. An order dismissing an indictment in the interest of justice may
be issued upon motion of the people or of the court itself as well as
upon that of the defendant. Upon issuing such an order, the court must
set forth its reasons therefor upon the record.
Motion to dismiss indictment; procedure.
1. A motion to dismiss an indictment pursuant to section 210.20 must
be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the people. If the
motion is based upon the existence or occurrence of facts, the motion
papers must contain sworn allegations thereof, whether by the defendant
or by another person or persons. Such sworn allegations may be based
upon personal knowledge of the affiant or upon information and belief,
provided that in the latter event the affiant must state the sources of
such information and the grounds of such belief. The defendant may
further submit documentary evidence supporting or tending to support the
allegations of the moving papers.
2. The people may file with the court, and in such case must serve a
copy thereof upon the defendant or his counsel, an answer denying or
admitting any or all of the allegations of the moving papers, and may
further submit documentary evidence refuting or tending to refute such
allegations.
3. After all papers of both parties have been filed, and after all
documentary evidence, if any, has been submitted, the court must
consider the same for the purpose of determining whether the motion is
determinable without a hearing to resolve questions of fact.
4. The court must grant the motion without conducting a hearing if:
(a) The moving papers allege a ground constituting legal basis for
the motion pursuant to subdivision one of section 210.20; and
(b) Such ground, if based upon the existence or occurrence of facts,
is supported by sworn allegations of all facts essential to support the
motion; and
(c) The sworn allegations of fact essential to support the motion are
either conceded by the people to be true or are conclusively
substantiated by unquestionable documentary proof.
5. The court may deny the motion without conducting a hearing if:
(a) The moving papers do not allege any ground constituting legal
basis for the motion pursuant to subdivision one of section 210.20; or
(b) The motion is based upon the existence or occurrence of facts,
and the moving papers do not contain sworn allegations supporting all
the essential facts; or
(c) An allegation of fact essential to support the motion is
conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof.
6. If the court does not determine the motion pursuant to subdivision
four or five, it must conduct a hearing and make findings of fact
essential to the determination thereof. The defendant has a right to be
present in person at such hearing but may waive such right.
7. Upon such a hearing, the defendant has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the
motion.
8. When the court dismisses the entire indictment without authorizing
resubmission of the charge or charges to a grand jury, it must order
that the defendant be discharged from custody if he is in the custody of
the sheriff, or if he is at liberty on bail it must exonerate the bail.
9. When the court dismisses the entire indictment but authorizes
resubmission of the charge or charges to a grand jury, such
authorization is, for purposes of this subdivision, deemed to constitute
an order holding the defendant for the action of a grand jury with
respect to such charge or charges. Such order must be accompanied by a
securing order either releasing the defendant on his own recognizance or
fixing bail or committing him to the custody of the sheriff pending
resubmission of the case to the grand jury and the grand jury's
disposition thereof. Such securing order remains in effect until the
first to occur of any of the following:
(a) A statement to the court by the people that they do not intend to
resubmit the case to a grand jury;
(b) Arraignment of the defendant upon an indictment or prosecutor's
information filed as a result of resubmission of the case to a grand
jury. Upon such arraignment, the arraigning court must issue a new
securing order;
(c) The filing with the court of a grand jury dismissal of the case
following resubmission thereof;
(d) The expiration of a period of forty-five days from the date of
issuance of the order; provided that such period may, for good cause
shown, be extended by the court to a designated subsequent date if such
be necessary to accord the people reasonable opportunity to resubmit the
case to a grand jury.
Upon the termination of the effectiveness of the securing order
pursuant to paragraph (a), (c) or (d), the court must immediately order
that the defendant be discharged from custody if he is in the custody of
the sheriff, or if he is at liberty on bail it must exonerate the bail.
Although expiration of the period of time specified in paragraph (d)
without any resubmission or grand jury disposition of the case
terminates the effectiveness of the securing order, it does not
terminate the effectiveness of the order authorizing resubmission.
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in marihuana cases
in a superior court.
Upon or after arraignment in a superior court upon an indictment where
the sole remaining count or counts charge a violation or violations of
section 221.05, 221.10, 221.15, 221.35 or 221.40 of the penal law and
before the entry of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a trial
thereof, the court, upon motion of a defendant, may order that all
proceedings be suspended and the action adjourned in contemplation of
dismissal or may dismiss the indictment in furtherance of justice, in
accordance with the provisions of section 170.56 of this chapter.
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in misdemeanor cases
in superior court.
Upon or after the arraignment in a superior court upon an indictment
where the sole remaining count or counts charge a misdemeanor offense,
and before the entry of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a
trial thereof, the court, upon motion of the people or the defendant and
with the consent of the other party, or upon the court's own motion with
the consent of both the people and the defendant, may order that all
proceedings be suspended and the action adjourned in contemplation of
dismissal, in accordance with the provisions of section 170.55 of this
chapter.
Requirement of plea.
Unless an indictment is dismissed or the criminal action thereon
terminated or abated pursuant to the provisions of this article or some
other provision of law, the defendant must be required to enter a plea
thereto.
ARTICLE 215 Adjournment In Contemplation of Dismissal For Purposes of Referring Selected Felonies to Dispute Resolution
Referral of selected felonies to dispute resolution.
Upon or after arraignment in a local criminal court upon a felony
complaint, or upon or after arraignment in a superior court upon an
indictment or superior court information, and before final disposition
thereof, the court, with the consent of the people and of the defendant,
and with reasonable notice to the victim and an opportunity for the
victim to be heard, may order that the action be adjourned in
contemplation of dismissal, for the purpose of referring the action to a
community dispute center established pursuant to article twenty-one-A of
the judiciary law. Provided, however, that the court may not order any
action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal if the defendant is
charged therein with: (i) a class A felony, or (ii) a violent felony
offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law, or (iii) any drug
offense as defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law, or
(iv) a felony upon the conviction of which defendant must be sentenced
as a second felony offender, a second violent felony offender, or a
persistent violent felony offender pursuant to sections 70.06, 70.04 and
70.08 of the penal law, or a felony upon the conviction of which
defendant may be sentenced as a persistent felony offender pursuant to
section 70.10 of such law.
Victim; definition.
For purposes of section 215.10 of this article, "victim" means any
person alleged to have sustained physical or financial injury to person
or property as a direct result of the crime or crimes charged in a
felony complaint, superior court information, or indictment.
Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal; restoration to
calendar; dismissal of action.
Upon issuing an order adjourning an action in contemplation of
dismissal pursuant to section 215.10 of this article, the court must
release the defendant on his own recognizance and refer the action to a
dispute resolution center established pursuant to article twenty-one-A
of the judiciary law. No later than forty-five days after an action has
been referred to a dispute resolution center, such center must advise
the district attorney as to whether the charges against defendant have
been resolved. Thereafter, if defendant has agreed to pay a fine,
restitution or reparation, the district attorney must be advised every
thirty days as to the status of such fine, restitution or reparation.
Upon application of the people, made at any time not more than six
months after the issuance of an order adjourning an action in
contemplation of dismissal, the court may restore the action to the
calendar upon a determination that dismissal of the accusatory
instrument would not be in furtherance of justice, and the action must
thereupon proceed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where defendant has
agreed to pay a fine, restitution, or reparation, but has not paid such
fine, restitution or reparation, upon application of the people, made at
any time not more than one year after the issuance of an order
adjourning an action in contemplation of dismissal, the court may
restore the action to the calendar upon a determination that defendant
has failed to pay such fine, restitution, or reparation, and the action
must thereupon proceed.
Dismissal of action; effect thereof; records.
If an action has not been restored to the calendar within six months,
or where the defendant has agreed to pay a fine, restitution or
reparation but has not paid such fine, restitution or reparation, within
one year, of the issuance of an order adjourning the action in
contemplation of dismissal, the accusatory instrument shall be deemed to
have been dismissed by the court in furtherance of justice at the
expiration of such six month or one year period, as the case may be.
Upon dismissal of an action, the arrest and prosecution shall be deemed
a nullity, and defendant shall be restored to the status he or she
occupied before his or her arrest and prosecution. All papers and
records relating to an action that has been dismissed pursuant to this
section shall be subject to the sealing provisions of section 160.50 of
this chapter.
ARTICLE 216 Judicial Diversion Program For Certain Felony Offenders
Definitions.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. * "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an
indictment or a superior court information with a class B, C, D or E
felony offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred
twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law, an offense defined in
sections 105.10 and 105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying
crime for the conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense
defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two
hundred twenty-two of the penal law, auto stripping in the second degree
as defined in section 165.10 of the penal law, auto stripping in the
first degree as defined in section 165.11 of the penal law, identity
theft in the second degree as defined in section 190.79 of the penal
law, identity theft in the first degree as defined in section 190.80 of
the penal law, or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision
five of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant
is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:
* NB Effective until July 5, 2028
* "Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an
indictment or a superior court information with a class B, C, D or E
felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred
twenty-two of the penal law, an offense defined in sections 105.10 and
105.13 of the penal law provided that the underlying crime for the
conspiracy charge is a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in
article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-two of the penal law,
auto stripping in the second degree as defined in section 165.10 of the
penal law, auto stripping in the first degree as defined in section
165.11 of the penal law, identity theft in the second degree as defined
in section 190.79 of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree
as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law, or any other specified
offense as defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this
chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant"
if he or she:
* NB Effective July 5, 2028
(a) within the preceding ten years, excluding any time during which
the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of
commission of the previous felony and the time of commission of the
present felony, has previously been convicted of: (i) a violent felony
offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law or (ii) any other
offense for which a merit time allowance is not available pursuant to
subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight
hundred three of the correction law, or (iii) a class A felony offense
defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law; or
(b) has previously been adjudicated a second violent felony offender
pursuant to section 70.04 of the penal law or a persistent violent
felony offender pursuant to section 70.08 of the penal law.
A defendant who also stands charged with a violent felony offense as
defined in section 70.02 of the penal law or an offense for which merit
time allowance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the
correction law for which the court must, upon the defendant's conviction
thereof, sentence the defendant to incarceration in state prison is not
an eligible defendant while such charges are pending. A defendant who is
excluded from the judicial diversion program pursuant to this paragraph
or paragraph (a) or (b) of this subdivision may become an eligible
defendant upon the prosecutor's consent.
2. "Alcohol and substance use evaluation" means a written assessment
and report by a court-approved entity or licensed health care
professional experienced in the treatment of alcohol and substance use
disorder, or by an addiction and substance abuse counselor credentialed
by the office of addiction services and supports pursuant to section
19.07 of the mental hygiene law, which shall include:
(a) an evaluation as to whether the defendant has a history of alcohol
or substance use disorder, as such terms are defined in the diagnostic
and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition, and a
co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness and the relationship
between such use and mental disorder or mental illness, if any;
(b) a recommendation as to whether the defendant's alcohol or
substance use, if any, could be effectively addressed by judicial
diversion in accordance with this article;
(c) a recommendation as to the treatment modality, level of care and
length of any proposed treatment to effectively address the defendant's
alcohol or substance use and any co-occurring mental disorder or
illness; and
(d) any other information, factor, circumstance, or recommendation
deemed relevant by the assessing entity or specifically requested by the
court.
Judicial diversion program; court procedures.
1. At any time after the arraignment of an eligible defendant, but
prior to the entry of a plea of guilty or the commencement of trial, the
court at the request of the eligible defendant, may order an alcohol and
substance use evaluation. An eligible defendant may decline to
participate in such an evaluation at any time. The defendant shall
provide a written authorization, in compliance with the requirements of
any applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations authorizing
disclosure of the results of the assessment to the defendant's attorney,
the prosecutor, the local probation department, the court, authorized
court personnel and other individuals specified in such authorization
for the sole purpose of determining whether the defendant should be
offered judicial diversion for treatment for substance use, alcohol use
and any co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness.
2. Upon receipt of the completed alcohol and substance use evaluation
report, the court shall provide a copy of the report to the eligible
defendant and the prosecutor.
3. (a) Upon receipt of the evaluation report either party may request
a hearing on the issue of whether the eligible defendant should be
offered alcohol or substance use treatment pursuant to this article. At
such a proceeding, which shall be held as soon as practicable so as to
facilitate early intervention in the event that the defendant is found
to need alcohol or substance use treatment, the court may consider oral
and written arguments, may take testimony from witnesses offered by
either party, and may consider any relevant evidence including, but not
limited to, evidence that:
(i) the defendant had within the preceding ten years (excluding any
time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between
the time of the acts that led to the youthful offender adjudication and
the time of commission of the present offense) been adjudicated a
youthful offender for: (A) a violent felony offense as defined in
section 70.02 of the penal law; or (B) any offense for which a merit
time allowance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of
paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the
correction law; and
(ii) in the case of a felony offense defined in subdivision five of
section 410.91 of this chapter, or section 165.10, 165.11, 190.79 or
190.80 of the penal law, any statement of or submitted by the victim, as
defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 380.50 of this
chapter.
(b) Upon completion of such a proceeding, the court shall consider and
make findings of fact with respect to whether:
(i) the defendant is an eligible defendant as defined in subdivision
one of section 216.00 of this article;
(ii) the defendant has a history of alcohol or substance use;
(iii) such alcohol or substance use is a contributing factor to the
defendant's criminal behavior;
(iv) the defendant's participation in judicial diversion could
effectively address such use; and
(v) institutional confinement of the defendant is or may not be
necessary for the protection of the public.
4. When an authorized court determines, pursuant to paragraph (b) of
subdivision three of this section, that an eligible defendant should be
offered alcohol or substance use treatment, or when the parties and the
court agree to an eligible defendant's participation in alcohol or
substance use treatment, an eligible defendant may be allowed to
participate in the judicial diversion program offered by this article.
Prior to the court's issuing an order granting judicial diversion, the
eligible defendant shall be required to enter a plea of guilty to the
charge or charges; provided, however, that no such guilty plea shall be
required when:
(a) the people and the court consent to the entry of such an order
without a plea of guilty; or
(b) based on a finding of exceptional circumstances, the court
determines that a plea of guilty shall not be required. For purposes of
this subdivision, exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of
the ultimate disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is
likely to result in severe collateral consequences.
5. The defendant shall agree on the record or in writing to abide by
the release conditions set by the court, which, shall include:
participation in a specified period of alcohol or substance use
treatment at a specified program or programs identified by the court,
which may include periods of detoxification, residential or outpatient
treatment, or both, as determined after taking into account the views of
the health care professional who conducted the alcohol and substance use
evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing
such treatment or monitoring the defendant's progress in such treatment;
and may include: (i) periodic court appearances, which may include
periodic urinalysis; (ii) a requirement that the defendant refrain from
engaging in criminal behaviors; (iii) if the defendant needs treatment
for opioid use, that he or she may participate in and receive medically
prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional
licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting
within his or her lawful scope of practice, provided that no court shall
require the use of any specified type or brand of drug during the course
of medically prescribed drug treatments.
6. Upon an eligible defendant's agreement to abide by the conditions
set by the court, the court shall issue a securing order providing for
bail or release on the defendant's own recognizance and conditioning any
release upon the agreed upon conditions. The period of alcohol or
substance use treatment shall begin as specified by the court and as
soon as practicable after the defendant's release, taking into account
the availability of treatment, so as to facilitate early intervention
with respect to the defendant's substance use or condition and the
effectiveness of the treatment program. In the event that a treatment
program is not immediately available or becomes unavailable during the
course of the defendant's participation in the judicial diversion
program, the court may release the defendant pursuant to the securing
order.
7. When participating in judicial diversion treatment pursuant to this
article, any resident of this state who is covered under a private
health insurance policy or contract issued for delivery in this state
pursuant to article thirty-two, forty-three or forty-seven of the
insurance law or article forty-four of the public health law, or who is
covered by a self-funded plan which provides coverage for the diagnosis
and treatment of chemical abuse and chemical dependence however defined
in such policy; shall first seek reimbursement for such treatment in
accordance with the provisions of such policy or contract.
8. During the period of a defendant's participation in the judicial
diversion program, the court shall retain jurisdiction of the defendant,
provided, however, that the court may allow such defendant to (i) reside
in another jurisdiction, or (ii) participate in alcohol and substance
use treatment and other programs in the jurisdiction where the defendant
resides or in any other jurisdiction, while participating in a judicial
diversion program under conditions set by the court and agreed to by the
defendant pursuant to subdivisions five and six of this section. The
court may require the defendant to appear in court at any time to enable
the court to monitor the defendant's progress in alcohol or substance
use treatment. The court shall provide notice, reasonable under the
circumstances, to the people, the treatment provider, the defendant and
the defendant's counsel whenever it orders or otherwise requires the
appearance of the defendant in court. Failure to appear as required
without reasonable cause therefor shall constitute a violation of the
conditions of the court's agreement with the defendant.
9. (a) If at any time during the defendant's participation in the
judicial diversion program, the court has reasonable grounds to believe
that the defendant has violated a release condition in an important
respect or has willfully failed to appear before the court as requested,
the court except as provided in subdivision two of section 510.50 of
this chapter regarding a failure to appear, shall direct the defendant
to appear or issue a bench warrant to a police officer or an appropriate
peace officer directing him or her to take the defendant into custody
and bring the defendant before the court without unnecessary delay;
provided, however, that under no circumstances shall a defendant who
requires treatment for opioid use be deemed to have violated a release
condition on the basis of his or her participation in medically
prescribed drug treatments under the care of a health care professional
licensed or certified under title eight of the education law, acting
within his or her lawful scope of practice. The relevant provisions of
section 530.60 of this chapter relating to issuance of securing orders
shall apply to such proceedings under this subdivision.
(b) In determining whether a defendant violated a condition of his or
her release under the judicial diversion program, the court may conduct
a summary hearing consistent with due process and sufficient to satisfy
the court that the defendant has, in fact, violated the condition.
(c) If the court determines that the defendant has violated a
condition of his or her release under the judicial diversion program,
the court may modify the conditions thereof, reconsider the order of
recognizance or bail pursuant to subdivision two of section 510.30 of
this chapter, or terminate the defendant's participation in the judicial
diversion program; and when applicable proceed with the defendant's
sentencing in accordance with the agreement. Notwithstanding any
provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence
authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea
agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony
drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of
section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account the length of time
the defendant spent in residential treatment and how best to continue
treatment while the defendant is serving that sentence. In determining
what action to take for a violation of a release condition, the court
shall consider all relevant circumstances, including the views of the
prosecutor, the defense and the alcohol or substance use treatment
provider, and the extent to which persons who ultimately successfully
complete a drug treatment regimen sometimes relapse by not abstaining
from alcohol or substance use or by failing to comply fully with all
requirements imposed by a treatment program. The court shall also
consider using a system of graduated and appropriate responses or
sanctions designed to address such inappropriate behaviors, protect
public safety and facilitate, where possible, successful completion of
the alcohol or substance use treatment program.
(d) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed as preventing a
court from terminating a defendant's participation in the judicial
diversion program for violating a release condition when such a
termination is necessary to preserve public safety. Nor shall anything
in this subdivision be construed as precluding the prosecution of a
defendant for the commission of a different offense while participating
in the judicial diversion program.
(e) A defendant may at any time advise the court that he or she wishes
to terminate participation in the judicial diversion program, at which
time the court shall proceed with the case and, where applicable, shall
impose sentence in accordance with the plea agreement. Notwithstanding
any provision of law to the contrary, the court may impose any sentence
authorized for the crime of conviction in accordance with the plea
agreement, or any lesser sentence authorized to be imposed on a felony
drug offender pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c) of subdivision two of
section 70.70 of the penal law taking into account the length of time
the defendant spent in residential treatment and how best to continue
treatment while the defendant is serving that sentence.
10. Upon the court's determination that the defendant has successfully
completed the required period of alcohol or substance use treatment and
has otherwise satisfied the conditions required for successful
completion of the judicial diversion program, the court shall comply
with the terms and conditions it set for final disposition when it
accepted the defendant's agreement to participate in the judicial
diversion program. Such disposition may include, but is not limited to:
(a) requiring the defendant to undergo a period of interim probation
supervision and, upon the defendant's successful completion of the
interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding the provision of any
other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea
and dismissing the indictment; or (b) requiring the defendant to undergo
a period of interim probation supervision and, upon successful
completion of the interim probation supervision term, notwithstanding
the provision of any other law, permitting the defendant to withdraw his
or her guilty plea, enter a guilty plea to a misdemeanor offense and
sentencing the defendant as promised in the plea agreement, which may
include a period of probation supervision pursuant to section 65.00 of
the penal law; or (c) allowing the defendant to withdraw his or her
guilty plea and dismissing the indictment.
11. Nothing in this article shall be construed as restricting or
prohibiting courts or district attorneys from using other lawful
procedures or models for placing appropriate persons into alcohol or
substance use treatment.
TITLE J Prosecution of Indictments In Superior Courts--plea to Sentence
ARTICLE 220 The Plea
Plea; kinds of pleas.
The only kinds of pleas which may be entered to an indictment are
those specified in this section:
1. The defendant may as a matter of right enter a plea of "not guilty"
to the indictment.
2. Except as provided in subdivision five, the defendant may as a
matter of right enter a plea of "guilty" to the entire indictment.
3. Except as provided in subdivision five, where the indictment
charges but one crime, the defendant may, with both the permission of
the court and the consent of the people, enter a plea of guilty of a
lesser included offense.
4. Except as provided in subdivision five, where the indictment
charges two or more offenses in separate counts, the defendant may, with
both the permission of the court and the consent of the people, enter a
plea of:
(a) Guilty of one or more but not all of the offenses charged; or
(b) Guilty of a lesser included offense with respect to any or all of
the offenses charged; or
(c) Guilty of any combination of offenses charged and lesser offenses
included within other offenses charged.
5. (a) (i) Where the indictment charges one of the class A felonies
defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law or the attempt to
commit any such class A felony, then any plea of guilty entered pursuant
to subdivision three or four of this section must be or must include at
least a plea of guilty of a class B felony.
(iii) Where the indictment charges one of the class B felonies defined
in article two hundred twenty of the penal law then any plea of guilty
entered pursuant to subdivision three or four must be or must include at
least a plea of guilty of a class D felony.
(b) Where the indictment charges any class B felony, other than a
class B felony defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law or
a class B violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of
section 70.02 of the penal law, then any plea of guilty entered pursuant
to subdivision three or four must be or must include at least a plea of
guilty of a felony.
(c) Where the indictment charges a felony, other than a class A felony
or class B felony defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law
or class B or class C violent felony offense as defined in subdivision
one of section 70.02 of the penal law, and it appears that the defendant
has previously been subjected to a predicate felony conviction as
defined in penal law section 70.06 then any plea of guilty entered
pursuant to subdivision three or four must be or must include at least a
plea of guilty of a felony.
(d) Where the indictment charges a class A felony, other than those
defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law, or charges a
class B or class C violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one
of section 70.02 of the penal law, then a plea of guilty entered
pursuant to subdivision three or four must be as follows:
(i) Where the indictment charges a class A felony offense or a class B
violent felony offense which is also an armed felony offense then a plea
of guilty must include at least a plea of guilty to a class C violent
felony offense;
(ii) Except as provided in subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, where
the indictment charges a class B violent felony offense or a class C
violent felony offense, then a plea of guilty must include at least a
plea of guilty to a class D violent felony offense;
(iii) Where the indictment charges the class D violent felony offense
of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined in
subdivision four of section 265.02 of the penal law, and the defendant
has not been previously convicted of a class A misdemeanor defined in
the penal law in the five years preceding the commission of the offense,
then a plea of guilty must be either to the class E violent felony
offense of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree
or to the class A misdemeanor of criminal possession of a weapon in the
fourth degree as defined in subdivision one of section 265.01 of the
penal law;
(iv) Where the indictment charges the class D violent felony offenses
of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined in
subdivision four of section 265.02 of the penal law and the provisions
of subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph do not apply, or subdivision
five, seven or eight of section 265.02 of the penal law, then a plea of
guilty must include at least a plea of guilty to a class E violent
felony offense.
(e) A defendant may not enter a plea of guilty to the crime of murder
in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal law;
provided, however, that a defendant may enter such a plea with both the
permission of the court and the consent of the people when the agreed
upon sentence is either life imprisonment without parole or a term of
imprisonment for the class A-I felony of murder in the first degree
other than a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
(f) The provisions of this subdivision shall apply irrespective of
whether the defendant is thereby precluded from entering a plea of
guilty of any lesser included offense.
(g) Where the defendant is a juvenile offender, the provisions of
paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this subdivision shall not apply and
any plea entered pursuant to subdivision three or four of this section,
must be as follows:
(i) If the indictment charges a person fourteen or fifteen years old
with the crime of murder in the second degree any plea of guilty entered
pursuant to subdivision three or four must be a plea of guilty of a
crime for which the defendant is criminally responsible;
(ii) If the indictment does not charge a crime specified in
subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, then any plea of guilty entered
pursuant to subdivision three or four of this section must be a plea of
guilty of a crime for which the defendant is criminally responsible
unless a plea of guilty is accepted pursuant to subparagraph (iii) of
this paragraph;
(iii) Where the indictment does not charge a crime specified in
subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, the district attorney may recommend
removal of the action to the family court. Upon making such
recommendation the district attorney shall submit a subscribed
memorandum setting forth: (1) a recommendation that the interests of
justice would best be served by removal of the action to the family
court; and (2) if the indictment charges a thirteen year old with the
crime of murder in the second degree, or a fourteen or fifteen year old
with the crimes of rape in the first degree as defined in paragraph (a)
of subdivision one, paragraph (a) of subdivision two and paragraph (a)
of subdivision three of section 130.35 of the penal law, rape in the
first degree as formerly defined in subdivision one of section 130.35 of
the penal law, a crime formerly defined in subdivision one of section
130.50 of the penal law, or an armed felony as defined in paragraph (a)
of subdivision forty-one of section 1.20 of this chapter specific
factors, one or more of which reasonably supports the recommendation,
showing, (i) mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the manner
in which the crime was committed, or (ii) where the defendant was not
the sole participant in the crime, that the defendant's participation
was relatively minor although not so minor as to constitute a defense to
the prosecution, or (iii) possible deficiencies in proof of the crime,
or (iv) where the juvenile offender has no previous adjudications of
having committed a designated felony act, as defined in subdivision
eight of section 301.2 of the family court act, regardless of the age of
the offender at the time of commission of the act, that the criminal act
was not part of a pattern of criminal behavior and, in view of the
history of the offender, is not likely to be repeated.
If the court is of the opinion based on specific factors set forth in
the district attorney's memorandum that the interests of justice would
best be served by removal of the action to the family court, a plea of
guilty of a crime or act for which the defendant is not criminally
responsible may be entered pursuant to subdivision three or four of this
section, except that a thirteen year old charged with the crime of
murder in the second degree may only plead to a designated felony act,
as defined in subdivision eight of section 301.2 of the family court
act.
Upon accepting any such plea, the court must specify upon the record
the portion or portions of the district attorney's statement the court
is relying upon as the basis of its opinion and that it believes the
interests of justice would best be served by removal of the proceeding
to the family court. Such plea shall then be deemed to be a juvenile
delinquency fact determination and the court upon entry thereof must
direct that the action be removed to the family court in accordance with
the provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter.
(g-1) Where a defendant is an adolescent offender, the provisions of
paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this subdivision shall not apply.
Where the plea is to an offense constituting a misdemeanor, the plea
shall be deemed replaced by an order of fact-finding in a juvenile
delinquency proceeding, pursuant to section 346.1 of the family court
act, and the action shall be removed to the family court in accordance
with article seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter. Where the plea
is to an offense constituting a felony, the court may remove the action
to the family court in accordance with section 722.23 and article seven
hundred twenty-five of this chapter.
(h) Where the indictment charges the class E felony offense of
aggravated harassment of an employee by an incarcerated individual as
defined in section 240.32 of the penal law, then a plea of guilty must
include at least a plea of guilty to a class E felony.
6. The defendant may, with both the permission of the court and the
consent of the people, enter a plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect to the indictment in the manner prescribed in
section 220.15 of this chapter.
Plea; plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect.
1. The defendant may, with both the permission of the court and the
consent of the people, enter a plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect to the entire indictment. The district attorney
must state to the court either orally on the record or in a writing
filed with the court that the people consent to the entry of such plea
and that the people are satisfied that the affirmative defense of lack
of criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect would
be proven by the defendant at a trial by a preponderance of the
evidence. The district attorney must further state to the court in
detail the evidence available to the people with respect to the offense
or offenses charged in the indictment, including all psychiatric
evidence available or known to the people. If necessary, the court may
conduct a hearing before accepting such plea. The district attorney
must further state to the court the reasons for recommending such plea.
The reasons shall be stated in detail and not in conclusory terms.
2. Counsel for the defendant must state that in his opinion defendant
has the capacity to understand the proceedings and to assist in his own
defense and that the defendant understands the consequences of a plea of
not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect. Counsel for the
defendant must further state whether in his opinion defendant has any
viable defense to the offense or offenses charged in the indictment
other than the affirmative defense of lack of criminal responsibility by
reason of mental disease or defect. Counsel for the defendant must
further state in detail the psychiatric evidence available to the
defendant with respect to such latter affirmative defense.
3. Before accepting a plea of not responsible by reason of mental
disease or defect, the court must address the defendant in open court
and determine that he understands each of the following:
(a) The nature of the charge to which the plea is offered, and the
consequences of such plea;
(b) That he has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in that
plea if it has already been entered;
(c) That he has the right to be tried by a jury, the right to the
assistance of counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses
against him, and the right not to be compelled to incriminate himself;
(d) That if he pleads not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect there will be no trial with respect to the charges contained in
the indictment, so that by offering such plea he waives the right to
such trial;
(e) That if he pleads not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect the court will ask him questions about the offense or offenses
charged in the indictment and that he will thereby waive his right not
to be compelled to incriminate himself; and
(f) That the acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect is the equivalent of a verdict of not
responsible by reason of mental disease or defect after trial.
4. The court shall not accept a plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect without first determining that there is a
factual basis for such plea. The court must address the defendant
personally in open court and determine that the plea is voluntary,
knowingly made, and not the result of force, threats, or promises. The
court must inquire whether the defendant's willingness to plead results
from prior discussions between the district attorney and counsel for the
defendant. The court must be satisfied that the defendant understands
the proceedings against him, has sufficient capacity to assist in his
own defense and understands the consequences of a plea of not
responsible by reason of mental disease or defect. The court may make
such inquiry as it deems necessary or appropriate for the purpose of
making the determinations required by this section.
5. Before accepting a plea of not responsible by reason of mental
disease or defect, the court must find and state each of the following
on the record in detail and not in conclusory terms:
(a) That it is satisfied that each element of the offense or offenses
charged in the indictment would be established beyond a reasonable doubt
at a trial;
(b) That the affirmative defense of lack of criminal responsibility
by reason of mental disease or defect would be proven by the defendant
at a trial by a preponderance of the evidence;
(c) That the defendant has the capacity to understand the proceedings
against him and to assist in his own defense;
(d) That such plea by the defendant is knowingly and voluntarily made
and that there is a factual basis for the plea;
(e) That the acceptance of such plea is required in the interest of
the public in the effective administration of justice.
6. When a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect is accepted by the court and recorded upon the minutes, the
provisions of section 330.20 of this chapter shall govern all subsequent
proceedings against the defendant.
Plea; meaning of lesser included offense for plea purposes.
1. A "lesser included offense," within the meaning of subdivisions
four and five of section 220.10 relating to the entry of a plea of
guilty to an offense of lesser grade than one charged in a count of an
indictment, means not only a "lesser included offense" as that term is
defined in subdivision thirty-seven of section 1.20, but also one which
is deemed to be such pursuant to the following rules:
(a) Where the only culpable mental state required for the crime
charged is that the proscribed conduct be performed intentionally, any
lesser offense consisting of reckless or criminally negligent, instead
of intentional, performance of the same conduct is deemed to constitute
a lesser included offense;
(b) Where the only culpable mental state required for the crime
charged is that the proscribed conduct be performed recklessly, any
lesser offense consisting of criminally negligent, instead of reckless,
performance of the same conduct is deemed to constitute a lesser
included offense;
(c) Where according to the allegations of a count a defendant's
participation in the crime charged consisted in whole or in part of
solicitation of another person to engage in the proscribed conduct, the
offense of criminal solicitation, in any appropriate degree, is, with
respect to such defendant, deemed to constitute a lesser included
offense;
(d) Where according to the allegations of a count a defendant's
participation in the crime charged consisted in whole or in part of
conspiratorial agreement or conduct with another person to engage in the
proscribed conduct, the crime of conspiracy, in any appropriate degree,
is, with respect to such defendant, deemed to constitute a lesser
included offense;
(e) Where according to the allegations of a count charging a felony a
defendant's participation in such felony consisted in whole or in part
of providing another person with means or opportunity for engaging in
the proscribed conduct, the crime of criminal facilitation, in any
appropriate degree, is, with respect to such defendant, deemed to
constitute a lesser included offense;
(f) Where the crime charged is assault or attempted assault, in any
degree, allegedly committed by intentionally causing or attempting to
cause physical injury to a person by the immediate use of physical force
against him, or where the crime charged is menacing, as defined in
section 120.15 of the penal law, the offense of harassment, as defined
in subdivision one of section 240.25 of the penal law, is deemed to
constitute a lesser included offense;
(g) Where the crime charged is murder in the second degree as defined
in subdivision three of section 125.25 of the penal law, allegedly
committed in the course of the commission or attempted commission of a
designated one of the underlying felonies enumerated in said
subdivision, or during immediate flight therefrom, such designated
underlying felony or attempted felony is deemed to constitute a lesser
included offense. If such designated underlying felony is alleged to be
robbery, burglary, kidnapping, or arson, without specification of the
degree thereof, or an attempt to commit the same, a plea of guilty may
be entered to the lowest degree thereof only, or as the case may be to
attempted commission of such felony in its lowest degree, unless the
allegations of the count clearly indicate the existence of all the
elements of a higher degree;
(h) Where the crime charged is criminal sale of a controlled
substance, any offense of criminal sale or possession of a controlled
substance, in any degree, is deemed to constitute a lesser included
offense.
(i) Where the crime charged is criminal possession of a controlled
substance, any offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance,
in any degree, is deemed to constitute a lesser included offense.
(j) Where the offense charged is unlawful disposal of hazardous wastes
in violation of section 27-0914 of the environmental conservation law,
any offense of unlawful disposal or possession of hazardous wastes as
set forth in sections 71-2707, 71-2709, 71-2711 and 71-2713 of such law,
in any degree, is deemed to constitute a lesser included offense;
(k) Where the offense charged is unlawful possession of hazardous
wastes in violation of section 27-0914 of the environmental conservation
law, any offense of unlawful possession of hazardous wastes as set forth
in sections 71-2707 and 71-2709 of such law, in any degree, is deemed to
constitute a lesser included offense.
2. An offense is deemed to be a lesser included offense with respect
to a crime charged in an indictment, pursuant to the provisions of
subdivision one, only for purposes of conviction upon a plea of guilty
and not for purposes of conviction by verdict. For the latter purpose,
an offense constitutes a lesser included one only when it conforms to
the definition of that term contained in subdivision thirty-seven of
section 1.20.
Plea; plea of guilty to part of indictment; plea covering other
indictments.
1. A plea of guilty not embracing the entire indictment, entered
pursuant to the provisions of subdivision four or five of section
220.10, is a "plea of guilty to part of the indictment."
2. The entry and acceptance of a plea of guilty to part of the
indictment constitutes a disposition of the entire indictment.
3. (a) (i) Except as provided in paragraph (b), or in paragraph (c)
dealing with juvenile offenders, a plea of guilty, whether to the entire
indictment or to part of the indictment, may, with both the permission
of the court and the consent of the people, be entered and accepted upon
the condition that it constitutes a complete disposition of one or more
other indictments against the defendant then pending.
(ii) If the other indictment or indictments are pending in a different
court or courts, they shall not be disposed of under this subdivision
unless the other courts and the appropriate prosecutors also transmit
their written permission and consent as provided in subdivision four of
section 220.50 of this article; in such a case the court in which the
plea is entered shall so notify the other courts which, upon such
notice, shall dismiss the appropriate indictments pending therein.
(b) (i) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or to part
of the indictment for any crime other than a class A felony, may not be
accepted on the condition that it constitutes a complete disposition of
one or more other indictments against the defendant wherein is charged a
class A-I felony as defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal
law or the attempt to commit any such class A-I felony, except that an
eligible youth, as defined in subdivision two of section 720.10, may
plea to a class B felony, upon consent of the district attorney, for
purposes of adjudication as a youthful offender.
(ii) Where it appears that the defendant has previously been subjected
to a predicate felony conviction as defined in paragraph (b) of
subdivision (1) of section 70.06 of the penal law, a plea of guilty,
whether to the entire indictment or to part of the indictment, of any
offense other than a felony may not be accepted on the condition that it
constitutes a complete disposition of one or more other indictments
against the defendant wherein is charged a felony, other than a class A
felony or a class B or class C violent felony offense as defined in
subdivision one of section 70.02 of the penal law.
(iii) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or part of
the indictment for any crime other than a class A felony or a class B or
class C violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section
70.02 of the penal law, may not be accepted on the condition that it
constitutes a complete disposition of one or more other indictments
against the defendant wherein is charged a class A felony, other than
those defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law, or a class
B violent felony offense which is also an armed felony offense.
(iv) Except as provided in subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph, a
plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or part of the
indictment, for any crime other than a class A felony or a class B, C,
or D violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section
70.02 of the penal law, may not be accepted on the condition that it
constitutes a complete disposition of one or more other indictments
against the defendant wherein is charged a class B or class C violent
felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section 70.02 of the
penal law,
(v) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or part of the
indictment, for any crime other than a violent felony offense as defined
in section 70.02 of the penal law, may not be accepted on the condition
that it constitutes a complete disposition of one or more other
indictments against the defendant wherein is charged the class D violent
felony offenses of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree
as defined in subdivision four, five, seven or eight of section 265.02
of the penal law; provided, however, a plea of guilty, whether to the
entire indictment or part of the indictment, for the class A misdemeanor
of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree as defined in
subdivision one of section 265.01 of the penal law may be accepted on
the condition that it constitutes a complete disposition of one or more
other indictments against the defendant wherein is charged the class D
violent felony offense of criminal possession of a weapon in the third
degree as defined in subdivision four of section 265.02 of the penal law
when the defendant has not been previously convicted of a class A
misdemeanor defined in the penal law in the five years preceding the
commission of the offense.
(vi) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or to part of
the indictment for any crime other than a felony, may not be accepted on
the condition that it constitutes a complete disposition of one or more
other indictments against the defendant wherein is charged a class B
felony other than a class B violent felony offense as defined in
subdivision one of section 70.02 of the penal law.
(vii) A defendant may not enter a plea of guilty to the crime of
murder in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal
law; provided, however, that a defendant may enter such a plea with both
the permission of the court and the consent of the people when the
agreed upon sentence is either life imprisonment without parole or a
term of imprisonment for the class A-I felony of murder in the first
degree other than a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
(viii) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or to part
of the indictment for any crime other than a class A or class B felony
may not be accepted on condition that it constitutes a complete
disposition of one or more other indictments against the defendant
wherein is charged a class A-II felony defined in article two hundred
twenty of the penal law or the attempt to commit any such felony.
(ix) A plea of guilty, whether to the entire indictment or to part of
the indictment for any crime other than a class B, a class C, or a class
D felony, may not be accepted on condition that it constitutes a
complete disposition of one or more other indictments against the
defendant wherein is charged a class B felony defined in article two
hundred twenty of the penal law.
(c) Where the defendant is a juvenile offender, a plea of guilty,
whether to the entire indictment or to part of the indictment, of any
offense other than one for which the defendant is criminally responsible
may not be accepted on the condition that it constitutes a complete
disposition of one or more other indictments against the defendant.
Hearing on predicate felony conviction.
In any case where the defendant offers to enter a plea of guilty of a
misdemeanor to constitute a disposition of the entire indictment or to
constitute a complete disposition of one or more other indictments, or
both, and the permission of the court and the consent of the people must
be withheld solely upon the ground that it appears the defendant has
previously been subjected to a predicate felony conviction as defined in
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.06 of the penal law the
court, if the defendant does not admit such predicate felony conviction,
may conduct the hearing required by section 400.21 for the purpose of
determining whether the plea may be entered or must be rejected. The
finding upon any such hearing shall also be binding upon the defendant
for the purpose of sentence.
Plea; plea of not guilty; meaning.
A plea of not guilty constitutes a denial of every allegation of the
indictment.
Plea; entry of plea.
1. A plea to an indictment, other than one against a corporation, must
be entered orally by the defendant in person; except that a plea to an
indictment which does not charge a felony may, with the permission of
the court, be entered by counsel upon submission by him of written
authorization of the defendant.
2. A plea to an indictment against a corporation must be entered by
counsel.
3. If a defendant who is required to enter a plea to an indictment
refuses to do so or remains mute, the court must enter a plea of not
guilty to the indictment in his behalf.
4. Where the permission of the court and the consent of the people are
a prerequisite to the entry of a plea of guilty, the court and the
prosecutor must either orally on the record or in a writing filed with
the indictment state their reason for granting permission or consenting,
as the case may be, to entry of the plea of guilty.
5. When a sentence is agreed upon by the prosecutor and a defendant as
a predicate to entry of a plea of guilty, the court or the prosecutor
must orally on the record, or in writing filed with the court, state the
sentence agreed upon as a condition of such plea.
6. Where the defendant consents to a plea of guilty to the indictment,
or part of the indictment, or consents to be prosecuted by superior
court information as set forth in section 195.20 of this chapter, and if
the defendant and prosecutor agree that as a condition of the plea or
the superior court information certain property shall be forfeited by
the defendant, the description and present estimated monetary value of
the property shall be stated in court by the prosecutor at the time of
plea. Within thirty days of the acceptance of the plea or superior court
information by the court, the prosecutor shall send to the commissioner
of the division of criminal justice services a document containing the
name of the defendant, the description and present estimated monetary
value of the property, any other demographic data as required by the
division of criminal justice services and the date the plea or superior
court information was accepted. Any property forfeited by the defendant
as a condition to a plea of guilty to an indictment, or a part thereof,
or to a superior court information, shall be disposed of in accordance
with the provisions of section thirteen hundred forty-nine of the civil
practice law and rules.
* 7. Prior to accepting a defendant's plea of guilty to a count or
counts of an indictment or a superior court information charging a
felony offense, the court must advise the defendant on the record, that
if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States, the defendant's
plea of guilty and the court's acceptance thereof may result in the
defendant's deportation, exclusion from admission to the United States
or denial of naturalization pursuant to the laws of the United States.
Where the plea of guilty is to a count or counts of an indictment
charging a felony offense other than a violent felony offense as defined
in section 70.02 of the penal law or an A-I felony offense other than an
A-I felony as defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law,
the court must also, prior to accepting such plea, advise the defendant
that, if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States and is or
becomes the subject of a final order of deportation issued by the United
States Immigration and Naturalization Service, the defendant may be
paroled to the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for
deportation purposes at any time subsequent to the commencement of any
indeterminate or determinate prison sentence imposed as a result of the
defendant's plea. The failure to advise the defendant pursuant to this
subdivision shall not be deemed to affect the voluntariness of a plea of
guilty or the validity of a conviction, nor shall it afford a defendant
any rights in a subsequent proceeding relating to such defendant's
deportation, exclusion or denial of naturalization.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
8. Prior to accepting a defendant's plea of guilty to a count or
counts of an indictment or a superior court information charging a
felony offense, the court must advise the defendant on the record that
conviction will result in loss of the right to vote while the defendant
is serving a felony sentence in a correctional facility and that the
right to vote will be restored upon the defendant's release.
Notice before entry of plea or trial involving a public
official.
Prior to trial, and before accepting a defendant's plea to a count or
counts of an indictment or a superior court information charging a
felony offense, the court must individually advise the defendant, on the
record, that if at the time of the alleged felony crime the defendant
was a public official, as defined in subdivision six of section one
hundred fifty-six of the retirement and social security law, the
defendant's plea of guilty and the court's acceptance thereof or
conviction after trial may result in proceedings for the reduction or
revocation of such defendant's pension pursuant to article three-B of
the retirement and social security law.
Plea; change of plea.
1. A defendant who has entered a plea of not guilty to an indictment
may as a matter of right withdraw such plea at any time before rendition
of a verdict and enter a plea of guilty to the entire indictment
pursuant to subdivision two, but subject to the limitation in
subdivision five of section 220.10.
2. A defendant who has entered a plea of not guilty to an indictment
may, with both the permission of the court and the consent of the
people, withdraw such plea at any time before the rendition of a verdict
and enter: (a) a plea of guilty to part of the indictment pursuant to
subdivision three or four but subject to the limitation in subdivision
five of section 220.10, or (b) a plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect to the indictment pursuant to section 220.15 of
this chapter.
3. At any time before the imposition of sentence, the court in its
discretion may permit a defendant who has entered a plea of guilty to
the entire indictment or to part of the indictment, or a plea of not
responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, to withdraw such
plea, and in such event the entire indictment, as it existed at the time
of such plea, is restored.
4. When a special information has been filed pursuant to section
200.61 or 200.62 of this chapter, a defendant may enter a plea of guilty
to the count or counts of the indictment to which the special
information applies without admitting the allegations of the special
information. Whenever a defendant enters a plea of guilty to the count
or counts of the indictment to which the special information applies
without admitting the allegations of the special information, the court
must, unless the people consent otherwise, conduct a hearing in
accordance with paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section 200.62 or
paragraph (b) of subdivision three of section 200.61 of this chapter,
whichever is applicable.
ARTICLE 230 Removal of Action
Removal of action; from supreme court to county court and from
county court to supreme court; at instance of court.
Upon order of an appropriate court or judge, made at its or his own
instance pursuant to rules established by the appellate division of the
appropriate department, (a) an indictment filed with the supreme court
at a term held in a particular county outside of New York City may,
prior to entry of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a trial
thereof, be removed to the county court of such county, and (b) an
indictment filed in a county court may similarly be removed to the
supreme court at a term held or to be held in the same county. Each of
the appellate divisions of the second, third and fourth departments may
establish rules authorizing such removals with respect to the superior
courts within its department, and prescribing the courts or judges who
may order such removals and other procedural matters involved therein.
Removal of action to certain courts within a county.
1. In any county outside a city having a population of one million or
more, upon or after arraignment of a defendant on an indictment pending
in a superior court having jurisdiction thereof, such court may, upon
motion of the defendant and after giving the district attorney an
opportunity to be heard, order that the action be removed from the court
in which the matter is pending to another court in the same county that
has been designated as a human trafficking court or veterans treatment
court by the chief administrator of the courts, and such human
trafficking court or veterans treatment court may then conduct such
action to judgment or other final disposition; provided, however, that
no court may order removal pursuant to this section to a veterans
treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of this chapter where the accused and the person
alleged to be the victim of such offense charged are members of the same
family or household as defined in such subdivision one of section
530.11; and provided further that an order of removal issued under this
subdivision shall not take effect until five days after the date the
order is issued unless, prior to such effective date, the human
trafficking court or veterans treatment court notifies the court that
issued the order that:
(a) it will not accept the action, in which event the order shall not
take effect; or
(b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date.
2. Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of
subdivision one of this section, the human trafficking court or veterans
treatment court shall promptly give notice to the defendant, his or her
counsel and the district attorney.
Removal of action; removal from county court to supreme court
and change of venue; upon motion of party.
1. At any time within the period provided by section 255.20, the
appellate division of the department embracing the county, upon motion
of either the defendant or the people, may, for good cause shown, order
that the indictment and action be removed from the county court to the
supreme court at a term held or to be held in the same county.
2. At any time within the period provided by section 255.20, the
appellate division of the department embracing the county in which the
superior court is located may, upon motion of either the defendant or
the people demonstrating reasonable cause to believe that a fair and
impartial trial cannot be had in such county, order either:
(a) that the indictment and action be removed from such superior court
to a designated superior court of or located in another county; or
(b) that the commissioner of jurors of such county, in consultation
with the appropriate administrative judge of the judicial district in
which the county is located, expand the pool of jurors to encompass
prospective jurors from the jury lists of counties that are within the
judicial district in which, and that are geographically contiguous with
the county in which, such superior court is located.
In making such determination the appellate division shall consider,
among other factors, the hardship on potential jurors and the potential
depletion of a county's qualified juror list that may result from an
order expanding the jury pool. An order of removal under paragraph (a)
herein must, if the defendant is in custody at the time, include a
provision for transfer of custody by the sheriff or other appropriate
public servant of the county of confinement to the sheriff or other
appropriate public servant of the county to which the action has been
removed. If the order is issued upon motion of the people, the appellate
division may impose such conditions as it deems equitable and
appropriate to insure that the removal does not subject the defendant to
an unreasonable burden in making his defense. Any additional cost to the
people incurred in complying with the order must be borne by the county
from which the action originated.
3. Any motion made pursuant to this section must be based upon papers
stating the grounds therefor, and must be made within the period
provided by section 255.20 and upon five days notice thereof together
with service of the moving papers upon, as the case may be, (a) the
district attorney or (b) either the defendant or his counsel. In any
case, the motion must be made returnable either during the appellate
division term during which such moving papers are served or during the
next term thereof.
4. If the appellate division grants the motion and orders a removal of
the action, a certified copy of such order must be filed with the clerk
of the superior court in which the indictment is pending. Such clerk
must thereupon transmit such instrument, together with the pertinent
papers and proceedings of the action, including all undertakings for
appearances of the defendant and of the witnesses, or a certified copy
or copies of the same, to the term of the superior court to which the
action has been removed. Such latter court must then proceed to conduct
the action to judgment or other final disposition.
Removal of action to certain courts in an adjoining county.
1. In any county outside a city having a population of one million or
more, the court may, upon motion of the defendant and with consent of
the district attorney and the district attorney of the adjoining county
that has a superior court designated a human trafficking court, veterans
treatment court, or mental health court by the chief administrator of
the courts, order that the indictment and action be removed from the
court in which the matter is pending to such human trafficking court,
veterans treatment court, or mental health court, whereupon such court
may then conduct such action to judgment or other final disposition;
provided, however, that no court may order removal to a veterans
treatment court of a family offense charge described in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of this chapter pursuant to this section where the
accused and the person alleged to be the victim of such offense charged
are members of the same family or household as defined in such
subdivision one of section 530.11; provided further that an order of
removal issued under this subdivision shall not take effect until five
days after the date the order is issued unless, prior to such effective
date, the human trafficking court, veterans treatment court, or mental
health court notifies the court that issued the order that: (a) it will
not accept the action, in which event the order shall not take effect,
or (b) it will accept the action on a date prior to such effective date,
in which event the order shall take effect upon such prior date; and
provided further that, for mental health court transfers, the receiving
court shall coordinate with the local governmental unit, as the term is
defined in section 41.03 of the mental hygiene law, of the defendant's
county of residence for the planning and delivery of treatment services.
2. Upon providing notification pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of
subdivision one of this section, the human trafficking court, veterans
treatment court, or mental health court shall promptly give notice to
the defendant, the defendant's counsel and the district attorney of both
counties.
Removal of action; stay of trial pending motion therefor.
1. At any time when a timely motion for removal of an action from the
county court to the supreme court or for a change of venue may be made
pursuant to section 230.20, a justice holding a term of the supreme
court in the district in which the indictment is pending, or a justice
of the appellate division of the department in which the indictment is
pending, upon application of either the defendant or the people, may, in
his discretion and for good cause shown, order that the trial of such
indictment be stayed for a designated period, not to exceed thirty days
from the issuance of such order, to allow the applicant party to make a
motion in the appropriate court for removal of the action from a county
court to the supreme court or for a change of venue.
2. Such an order may be issued only upon an application made in
writing and after reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard has been
accorded the other party.
3. Upon issuing the order, the supreme court justice or appellate
division justice must cause the order to be filed with the clerk of the
court in which the indictment is pending. Thereafter, no further
proceedings may be had in such court until a motion for removal or
change of venue, as the case may be, if made within the designated
period, has been determined, or until such designated period has expired
without any such motion having been made.
4. When such an application for a stay has been made to and denied by
a justice of the supreme court or a justice of the appellate division, a
second such application may not be made to any other such justice.
Removal of action; determinations and rulings before and after
removal; by which courts made.
Upon any removal of an indictment and action from one superior court
to another pursuant to the provisions of this article, determinations
and rulings with respect to the action made before such removal are not
thereby rendered invalid. All subsequent determinations and rulings
must be made by the court to which the action is removed; and such
latter court is deemed to have control of the grand jury minutes
underlying the indictment for the purpose of determining post-removal
motions addressed to the legal sufficiency of the grand jury evidence or
the validity of the grand jury proceeding.
ARTICLE 245 Discovery
Timing of discovery.
1. (a) Subject to subparagraph (iv) of this paragraph, the prosecution
shall perform its initial discovery obligations under subdivision one of
section 245.20 of this article as soon as practicable but not later than
the time periods specified in subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of this
paragraph, as applicable. Portions of materials claimed to be
non-discoverable may be withheld pending a determination and ruling of
the court under section 245.70 of this article; but the defendant shall
be notified in writing that information has not been disclosed under a
particular subdivision of such section, and the discoverable portions of
such materials shall be disclosed to the extent practicable. When the
discoverable materials, including video footage from body-worn cameras,
surveillance cameras, or dashboard cameras, are exceptionally voluminous
or, despite diligent, good faith efforts, are otherwise not in the
actual possession of the prosecution, the time period in this paragraph
may be stayed by up to an additional thirty calendar days without need
for a motion pursuant to subdivision two of section 245.70 of this
article.
(i) When a defendant is in custody during the pendency of the criminal
case, the prosecution shall perform its initial discovery obligations
within twenty calendar days after the defendant's arraignment on an
indictment, superior court information, prosecutor's information,
information, simplified information, misdemeanor complaint or felony
complaint.
(ii) When the defendant is not in custody during the pendency of the
criminal case, the prosecution shall perform its initial discovery
obligations within thirty-five calendar days after the defendant's
arraignment on an indictment, superior court information, prosecutor's
information, information, simplified information, misdemeanor complaint
or felony complaint.
(iii) Notwithstanding the previous provisions of this section, the
prosecutor's obligations shall not apply to a simplified information
charging a traffic infraction under the vehicle and traffic law, or to
an information charging one or more petty offenses as defined by the
municipal code of a village, town, city, or county, that do not carry a
statutorily authorized sentence of imprisonment, and where the defendant
stands charged before the court with no crime or offense, provided
however that nothing in this subparagraph shall prevent a defendant from
filing a motion for disclosure of such items and information under
subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article. The court shall, at
the first appearance, advise the defendant of their right to file a
motion for discovery.
(iv)(A) Portions of materials claimed to be non-discoverable may be
withheld pending a determination and ruling of the court under section
245.70 of this article; but the defendant shall be notified in writing
that information has not been disclosed under a particular subdivision
of such section, and the discoverable portions of such materials shall
be disclosed to the extent practicable. Information related to or
evidencing the identity of a 911 caller, the victim or witness of an
offense defined under article one hundred thirty or sections 230.34 and
230.34-a of the penal law, or any other victim or witness of a crime
where the defendant has substantiated affiliation with a criminal
enterprise as defined in subdivision three of section 460.10 of the
penal law may be withheld, provided, however, the defendant may move the
court for disclosure.
(B) When the discoverable materials are exceptionally voluminous or,
despite diligent, good faith efforts, are otherwise not in the actual
possession of the prosecution, the time period in this paragraph may be
extended pursuant to a motion pursuant to subdivision two of section
245.70 of this article. For purposes of this article, voluminous
materials may include, but are not limited to, video footage from body
worn cameras, surveillance cameras or dashboard cameras.
(b) The prosecution shall perform its supplemental discovery
obligations under subdivision three of section 245.20 of this article as
soon as practicable but not later than fifteen calendar days prior to
the first scheduled trial date.
(c) The prosecution shall disclose statements of the defendant as
described in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 245.20 of this
article to any defendant who has been arraigned in a local criminal
court upon a currently undisposed of felony complaint charging an
offense which is a subject of a prospective or pending grand jury
proceeding, no later than forty-eight hours before the time scheduled
for the defendant to testify at a grand jury proceeding pursuant to
subdivision five of section 190.50 of this part. Provided, however, that
if no grand jury is open and available to hear cases in the time frame
necessary to allow the prosecution to provide a forty-eight hour notice,
such statement shall be provided no later than twenty-four hours prior
to the scheduled time for the defendant to testify before the grand jury
pursuant to subdivision five of section 190.50 of this part.
2. Defendant's performance of obligations. The defendant shall perform
his or her discovery obligations under subdivision four of section
245.20 of this article not later than thirty calendar days after being
served with the prosecution's certificate of compliance pursuant to
subdivision one of section 245.50 of this article, except that portions
of materials claimed to be non-discoverable may be withheld pending a
determination and ruling of the court under section 245.70 of this
article; but the prosecution must be notified in writing that
information has not been disclosed under a particular section.
Automatic discovery.
1. Initial discovery for the defendant. The prosecution shall disclose
to the defendant, and permit the defendant to discover, inspect, copy,
photograph and test the following material and information in the
possession, custody or control of the prosecution or persons under the
prosecution's direction or control:
(a) All written or recorded statements, and the substance of all oral
statements, made by the defendant or a co-defendant to a public servant
engaged in law enforcement activity or to a person then acting under
their direction or in cooperation with them that relate to the subject
matter of the charges against the defendant or co-defendant in the
instant case, or a defense thereto.
(b) All transcripts of the testimony of a person who has testified
before a grand jury that relate to the subject matter of the charges
against the defendant in the instant case, including but not limited to
the defendant or a co-defendant. If in the exercise of reasonable
diligence, and due to the limited availability of transcription
resources, a transcript is unavailable for disclosure within the time
period specified in subdivision one of section 245.10 of this article,
such time period may be stayed by up to an additional thirty calendar
days without need for a motion pursuant to subdivision two of section
245.70 of this article; except that such disclosure shall be made as
soon as practicable and not later than thirty calendar days before the
first scheduled trial date, unless an order is obtained pursuant to
section 245.70 of this article. When the court is required to review
grand jury transcripts, the prosecution shall disclose such transcripts
to the court expeditiously upon receipt by the prosecutor,
notwithstanding the otherwise-applicable time periods for disclosure in
this article.
(c) The names and adequate contact information for all persons other
than law enforcement personnel whom the prosecutor knows to have
evidence or information relevant to any offense charged or to any
potential defense thereto, including a designation by the prosecutor as
to which of those persons may be called as witnesses. Nothing in this
paragraph shall require the disclosure of physical addresses; provided,
however, upon a motion and good cause shown the court may direct the
disclosure of a physical address. Information under this subdivision
relating to the identity of a 911 caller, the victim or witness of an
offense defined under article one hundred thirty or section 230.34 or
230.34-a of the penal law, any other victim or witness of a crime where
the defendant has substantiated affiliation with a criminal enterprise
as defined in subdivision three of section 460.10 of the penal law, or a
confidential informant may be withheld, and redacted from discovery
materials, without need for a motion pursuant to section 245.70 of this
article; but the prosecution shall notify the defendant in writing that
such information has not been disclosed, unless the court rules
otherwise for good cause shown.
(d) The name and work affiliation of all law enforcement personnel
whom the prosecutor knows to have evidence or information relevant to
any offense charged or to any potential defense thereto, including a
designation by the prosecutor as to which of those persons may be called
as witnesses. Information under this subdivision relating to undercover
personnel may be withheld, and redacted from discovery materials,
without need for a motion pursuant to section 245.70 of this article;
but the prosecution shall notify the defendant in writing that such
information has not been disclosed, unless the court rules otherwise for
good cause shown.
(e) All statements related to the subject matter of the case, written
or recorded or summarized in any writing or recording, made by persons
who have evidence or information relevant to any offense charged or to
any potential defense thereto, including all police reports, notes of
police and other investigators, law enforcement agency reports, and
statements, written or recorded or summarized in any writing or
recording, by persons to be called as witnesses at pre-trial hearings.
(f) Expert opinion evidence, including the name, business address,
current curriculum vitae, a list of publications, and a list of
proficiency tests and results administered or taken within the past ten
years of each expert witness whom the prosecutor intends to call as a
witness at trial or a pre-trial hearing, and all reports prepared by the
expert that pertain to the case, or if no report is prepared, a written
statement of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to
testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. This paragraph
does not alter or in any way affect the procedures, obligations or
rights set forth in section 250.10 of this title. If in the exercise of
reasonable diligence this information is unavailable for disclosure
within the time period specified in subdivision one of section 245.10 of
this article, that period shall be stayed without need for a motion
pursuant to subdivision two of section 245.70 of this article; except
that the prosecution shall notify the defendant in writing that such
information has not been disclosed, and such disclosure shall be made as
soon as practicable and not later than sixty calendar days before the
first scheduled trial date, unless an order is obtained pursuant to
section 245.70 of this article. When the prosecution's expert witness is
being called in response to disclosure of an expert witness by the
defendant, the court shall alter a scheduled trial date, if necessary,
to allow the prosecution thirty calendar days to make the disclosure and
the defendant thirty calendar days to prepare and respond to the new
materials.
(g) All tapes or other electronic recordings, including all electronic
recordings of 911 telephone calls made or received in connection with
the alleged criminal incident, and a designation by the prosecutor as to
which of the recordings under this paragraph the prosecution intends to
introduce at trial or a pre-trial hearing. If the discoverable materials
under this paragraph exceed ten hours in total length, the prosecution
may disclose only the recordings that it intends to introduce at trial
or a pre-trial hearing, along with a list of the source and approximate
quantity of other recordings and their general subject matter if known,
and the defendant shall have the right upon request to obtain recordings
not previously disclosed. The prosecution shall disclose the requested
materials as soon as practicable and not less than fifteen calendar days
after the defendant's request, unless an order is obtained pursuant to
section 245.70 of this article. The prosecution may withhold the names
and identifying information of any person who contacted 911 without the
need for a protective order pursuant to section 245.70 of this article,
provided, however, the defendant may move the court for disclosure. If
the prosecution intends to call such person as a witness at a trial or
hearing, the prosecution must disclose the name and contact information
of such witness no later than fifteen days before such trial or hearing,
or as soon as practicable.
(h) All photographs and drawings that relate to the subject matter of
the charges against the defendant in the instant case or a defense
thereto made or completed by a public servant engaged in law enforcement
activity, or which were made by a person whom the prosecutor intends to
call as a witness at trial or a pre-trial hearing.
(i) All photographs, photocopies and reproductions made by or at the
direction of law enforcement personnel of any property that relate to
the subject matter of the charges against the defendant in the instant
case or a defense thereto prior to its release pursuant to section
450.10 of the penal law.
(j) All reports, documents, records, data, calculations or writings,
including but not limited to preliminary tests and screening results and
bench notes and analyses performed or stored electronically, concerning
physical or mental examinations, or scientific tests or experiments or
comparisons, relating to the criminal action or proceeding which were
made by or at the request or direction of a public servant engaged in
law enforcement activity, or which were made by a person whom the
prosecutor intends to call as a witness at trial or a pre-trial hearing,
or which the prosecution intends to introduce at trial or a pre-trial
hearing. Information under this paragraph also includes, but is not
limited to, laboratory information management system records relating to
such materials, any preliminary or final findings of non-conformance
with accreditation, industry or governmental standards or laboratory
protocols, and any conflicting analyses or results by laboratory
personnel regardless of the laboratory's final analysis or results. If
the prosecution submitted one or more items for testing to, or received
results from, a forensic science laboratory or similar entity not under
the prosecution's direction or control, the court on motion of a party
shall issue subpoenas or orders to such laboratory or entity to cause
materials under this paragraph to be made available for disclosure. The
prosecution shall not be required to provide information related to the
results of physical or mental examinations, or scientific tests or
experiments or comparisons, unless and until such examinations, tests,
experiments, or comparisons have been completed.
(k) All evidence and information that relate to the subject matter of
the case, including that which is known to police or other law
enforcement agencies acting on the government's behalf in the case, that
tends to: (i) negate the defendant's guilt as to a charged offense; (ii)
reduce the degree of or mitigate the defendant's culpability as to a
charged offense; (iii) support a potential defense to a charged offense;
(iv) impeach the credibility of a testifying prosecution witness; (v)
undermine evidence of the defendant's identity as a perpetrator of a
charged offense; (vi) provide a basis for a motion to suppress evidence;
or (vii) mitigate punishment. Information under this subdivision shall
be disclosed whether or not such information is recorded in tangible
form and irrespective of whether the prosecutor credits the information.
The prosecutor shall disclose the information expeditiously upon its
receipt and shall not delay disclosure if it is obtained earlier than
the time period for disclosure in subdivision one of section 245.10 of
this article.
(l) A summary of all promises, rewards and inducements made in
connection with the instant case to, or in favor of, persons who may be
called as witnesses, as well as requests for consideration by persons
who may be called as witnesses and copies of all documents relevant to a
promise, reward or inducement.
(m) A list of all tangible objects obtained from, or allegedly
possessed by, the defendant or a co-defendant in connection with the
criminal action or proceeding. The list shall include a designation by
the prosecutor as to which objects were physically or constructively
possessed by the defendant and were recovered during a search or seizure
by a public servant or an agent thereof, and which tangible objects were
recovered by a public servant or an agent thereof after allegedly being
abandoned by the defendant. If the prosecution intends to prove the
defendant's possession of any tangible objects by means of a statutory
presumption of possession, it shall designate such intention as to each
such object. If reasonably practicable, the prosecution shall also
designate the location from which each tangible object was recovered.
There is also a right to inspect, copy, photograph and test the listed
tangible objects.
(n) Whether a search warrant has been executed in connection with the
criminal action or proceeding and all documents relating thereto,
including but not limited to the warrant, the warrant application,
supporting affidavits, a police inventory of all property seized under
the warrant, and a transcript of all testimony or other oral
communications offered in support of the warrant application.
(o) All tangible property that relates to the subject matter of the
case, along with a designation of which items the prosecution intends to
introduce in its case-in-chief at trial or a pre-trial hearing. If in
the exercise of reasonable diligence the prosecutor has not formed an
intention within the time period specified in subdivision one of section
245.10 of this article that an item under this subdivision will be
introduced at trial or a pre-trial hearing, the prosecution shall notify
the defendant in writing, and the time period in which to designate
items as exhibits shall be stayed without need for a motion pursuant to
subdivision two of section 245.70 of this article; but the disclosure
shall be made as soon as practicable and subject to the continuing duty
to disclose in section 245.60 of this article.
(p) A complete record of judgments of conviction for all defendants
and all persons designated as potential prosecution witnesses pursuant
to paragraph (c) of this subdivision, other than those witnesses who are
experts.
(q) When it is known to the prosecution, the existence of any pending
criminal action against all persons designated as potential prosecution
witnesses pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subdivision.
(r) The approximate date, time and place of the offense or offenses
charged and of the defendant's seizure and arrest.
(s) In any prosecution alleging a violation of the vehicle and traffic
law, where the defendant is charged by indictment, superior court
information, prosecutor's information, information, or simplified
information, all records of calibration, certification, inspection,
repair or maintenance of machines and instruments utilized to perform
any scientific tests and experiments, including but not limited to any
test of a person's breath, blood, urine or saliva, for the period of six
months prior and six months after such test was conducted, including the
records of gas chromatography related to the certification of all
reference standards and the certification certificate, if any, held by
the operator of the machine or instrument. The time period required by
subdivision one of section 245.10 of this article shall not apply to the
disclosure of records created six months after a test was conducted, but
such disclosure shall be made as soon as practicable and in any event,
the earlier of fifteen days following receipt, or fifteen days before
the first scheduled trial date.
(t) In any prosecution alleging a violation of section 156.05 or
156.10 of the penal law, the time, place and manner such violation
occurred.
(u) (i) A copy of all electronically created or stored information
seized or obtained by or on behalf of law enforcement from: (A) the
defendant as described in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph; or (B) a
source other than the defendant which relates to the subject matter of
the charges against the defendant in the instant case or a defense
thereto.
(ii) If the electronically created or stored information originates
from a device, account, or other electronically stored source that the
prosecution believes the defendant owned, maintained, or had lawful
access to and is within the possession, custody or control of the
prosecution or persons under the prosecution's direction or control, the
prosecution shall provide a complete copy of the electronically created
or stored information from the device or account or other source.
(iii) If possession of such electronically created or stored
information would be a crime under New York state or federal law, the
prosecution shall make those portions of the electronically created or
stored information that are not criminal to possess available as
specified under this paragraph and shall afford counsel for the
defendant access to inspect contraband portions at a supervised location
that provides regular and reasonable hours for such access, such as a
prosecutor's office, police station, or court.
(iv) This paragraph shall not be construed to alter or in any way
affect the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures or
such other rights a suspect or defendant may derive from the state
constitution or the United States constitution. If in the exercise of
reasonable diligence the information under this paragraph is not
available for disclosure within the time period required by subdivision
one of section 245.10 of this article, that period shall be stayed
without need for a motion pursuant to subdivision two of section 245.70
of this article, except that the prosecution shall notify the defendant
in writing that such information has not been disclosed, and such
disclosure shall be made as soon as practicable and not later than
forty-five calendar days before the first scheduled trial date, unless
an order is obtained pursuant to section 245.70 of this article.
(v) Any other material and information relevant to the subject matter
of the charges against the defendant in the instant case or a defense
thereto that are not designated in paragraphs (a) through (u) of this
subdivision.
2. Duties of the prosecution. The prosecutor shall make a diligent,
good faith effort to ascertain the existence of material or information
discoverable under subdivision one of this section and to cause such
material or information to be made available for discovery where it
exists but is not within the prosecutor's possession, custody or
control. The prosecutor shall not be required to obtain material or
information if it may be obtained with use of a subpoena duces tecum
where the defense is able to obtain the same material with the use of a
subpoena duces tecum. For purposes of subdivision one of this section,
all items and information related to the prosecution of a charge in the
possession of any New York state or local police or law enforcement
agency shall be deemed to be in the possession of the prosecution. The
prosecution shall also identify any laboratory having contact with
evidence related to the prosecution of a charge. This subdivision shall
not require the prosecutor to ascertain the existence of witnesses not
known to the police or another law enforcement agency, or the written or
recorded statements thereof, under paragraph (c) or (e) of subdivision
one of this section.
3. Supplemental discovery for the defendant. The prosecution shall
disclose to the defendant a list of all misconduct and criminal acts of
the defendant not charged in the indictment, superior court information,
prosecutor's information, information, or simplified information, which
the prosecution intends to use at trial for purposes of (a) impeaching
the credibility of the defendant, or (b) as substantive proof of any
material issue in the case. In addition the prosecution shall designate
whether it intends to use each listed act for impeachment and/or as
substantive proof.
4. Reciprocal discovery for the prosecution. (a) The defendant shall,
subject to constitutional limitations, disclose to the prosecution, and
permit the prosecution to discover, inspect, copy or photograph, any
material and relevant evidence within the defendant's or counsel for the
defendant's possession or control that is discoverable under paragraphs
(f), (g), (h), (j), (l) and (o) of subdivision one of this section,
which the defendant intends to introduce at trial or a pre-trial
hearing, and the names, addresses, birth dates, and all statements,
written or recorded or summarized in any writing or recording, of those
persons other than the defendant whom the defendant intends to call as
witnesses at trial or a pre-trial hearing.
(b) Disclosure of the name, address, birth date, and all statements,
written or recorded or summarized in any writing or recording, of a
person whom the defendant intends to call as a witness for the sole
purpose of impeaching a prosecution witness is not required until after
the prosecution witness has testified at trial.
(c) If in the exercise of reasonable diligence the reciprocally
discoverable information under paragraph (f) or (o) of subdivision one
of this section is unavailable for disclosure within the time period
specified in subdivision two of section 245.10 of this article, such
time period shall be stayed without need for a motion pursuant to
subdivision two of section 245.70 of this article; but the disclosure
shall be made as soon as practicable and subject to the continuing duty
to disclose in section 245.60 of this article.
5. Stay of automatic discovery; remedies and sanctions. Section 245.10
and subdivisions one, two, three and four of this section shall have the
force and effect of a court order, and failure to provide discovery
pursuant to such section or subdivision may result in application of any
remedies or sanctions permitted for non-compliance with a court order
under section 245.80 of this article. However, if in the judgment of
either party good cause exists for declining to make any of the
disclosures set forth above, such party may move for a protective order
pursuant to section 245.70 of this article and production of the item
shall be stayed pending a ruling by the court. The opposing party shall
be notified in writing that information has not been disclosed under a
particular section. When some parts of material or information are
discoverable but in the judgment of a party good cause exists for
declining to disclose other parts, the discoverable parts shall be
disclosed and the disclosing party shall give notice in writing that
non-discoverable parts have been withheld.
6. Redactions permitted. (a) Either party may redact the following
without the need to move for a protective order pursuant to section
245.70 of this article: social security numbers; tax numbers; the
physical addresses or other forms of contact information of witnesses,
provided that for any witness disclosed under paragraph (c) of
subdivision one of this section, the disclosing party provides at least
one form of adequate contact information; and material or information
not otherwise required to be disclosed under subdivision one of this
section, so long as the party making redactions based on the material
not being required to be disclosed under subdivision one of this section
provides the underlying reason for the redactions.
(b) If the contact information disclosed pursuant to paragraph (a) of
this subdivision is incorrect or inoperative, the party that made the
disclosure shall, upon request, furnish an alternative form of adequate
contact information for such witness.
7. Presumption of openness. There shall be a presumption in favor of
disclosure when interpreting sections 245.10 and 245.25, and subdivision
one of section 245.20, of this article.
Disclosure prior to certain guilty pleas.
1. Pre-indictment guilty pleas. Upon a felony complaint, where the
prosecution has made a pre-indictment guilty plea offer requiring a plea
to a crime, the prosecutor must disclose to the defense, and permit the
defense to discover, inspect, copy, photograph and test, all items and
information that would be discoverable prior to trial under subdivision
one of section 245.20 of this article and are in the possession, custody
or control of the prosecution. The prosecution shall disclose the
discoverable items and information not less than three calendar days
prior to the expiration date of any guilty plea offer by the prosecution
or any deadline imposed by the court for acceptance of the guilty plea
offer. If the prosecution does not comply with the requirements of this
subdivision, then, on a defendant's motion alleging a violation of this
subdivision, the court must consider the impact of any violation on the
defendant's decision to accept or reject a plea offer. If the court
finds that such violation materially affected the defendant's decision,
and if the prosecution declines to reinstate the lapsed or withdrawn
plea offer, the court - as a presumptive minimum sanction - must
preclude the admission at trial of any evidence not disclosed as
required under this subdivision. The court may take other appropriate
action as necessary to address the non-compliance. The rights under this
subdivision do not apply to items or information that are the subject of
a protective order under section 245.70 of this article; but if such
information tends to be exculpatory, the court shall reconsider the
protective order. A defendant may waive his or her rights under this
subdivision; but a guilty plea offer may not be conditioned on such
waiver.
2. Other guilty pleas. Upon an indictment, superior court information,
prosecutor's information, information, simplified information, or
misdemeanor complaint, where the prosecution has made a guilty plea
offer requiring a plea to a crime, the prosecutor must disclose to the
defense, and permit the defense to discover, inspect, copy, photograph
and test, all items and information that would be discoverable prior to
trial under subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article and are
within the possession, custody or control of the prosecution. The
prosecution shall disclose the discoverable items and information not
less than seven calendar days prior to the expiration date of any guilty
plea offer by the prosecution or any deadline imposed by the court for
acceptance of the guilty plea offer. If the prosecution does not comply
with the requirements of this subdivision, then, on a defendant's motion
alleging a violation of this subdivision, the court must consider the
impact of any violation on the defendant's decision to accept or reject
a plea offer. If the court finds that such violation materially affected
the defendant's decision, and if the prosecution declines to reinstate
the lapsed or withdrawn plea offer, the court - as a presumptive minimum
sanction - must preclude the admission at trial of any evidence not
disclosed as required under this subdivision. The court may take other
appropriate action as necessary to address the non-compliance. The
rights under this subdivision do not apply to items or information that
are the subject of a protective order under section 245.70 of this
article; but if such information tends to be exculpatory, the court
shall reconsider the protective order. A defendant may waive his or her
rights under this subdivision; but a guilty plea offer may not be
conditioned on such waiver. Notwithstanding the timelines contained in
the opening paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section
245.10 of this article, the prosecutor's discovery obligation under
subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article shall be performed as
soon as practicable, but not later than fifteen days before the trial of
a simplified information charging a traffic infraction under the vehicle
and traffic law, or by an information charging one or more petty
offenses as defined by the municipal code of a village, town, city, or
county, that do not carry a statutorily authorized sentence of
imprisonment, and where the defendant stands charged before the court
with no crime or offense, provided however that nothing in this
subdivision shall prevent a defendant from filing a motion for
disclosure of such items and information under subdivision one of such
section 245.20 of this article at an earlier date.
3. Repleader. Nothing in this section shall prevent the waiver of
discovery from being a condition of a repleader, where the defendant's
original conviction is vacated on agreement between the parties pursuant
to section 440.10 of this part.
Court orders for preservation, access or discovery.
1. Order to preserve evidence. At any time, a party may move for a
court order to any individual, agency or other entity in possession,
custody or control of items which are required to be disclosed under
subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article, requiring that such
items be preserved for a specified period of time. The court shall hear
and rule upon such motions expeditiously. The court may modify or vacate
such an order upon a showing that preservation of particular evidence
will create significant hardship to such individual, agency or entity,
on condition that the probative value of that evidence is preserved by a
specified alternative means.
2. Order to grant access to premises. Without prejudice to its ability
to issue a subpoena pursuant to this chapter and after an accusatory
instrument has been filed, the defendant may move, upon notice to the
prosecution and any impacted individual, agency, or entity, for a court
order to access a crime scene or other premises relevant to the subject
matter of the case, requiring that counsel for the defendant be granted
reasonable access to inspect, photograph, or measure such crime scene or
premises, and that the condition of the crime scene or premises remain
unchanged in the interim. The court shall consider defendant's expressed
need for access to the premises including the risk that defendant will
be deprived of evidence or information relevant to the case, the
position of any individual or entity with possessory or ownership rights
to the premises, the nature of the privacy interest and any perceived or
actual hardship of the individual or entity with possessory or ownership
rights, and the position of the prosecution with respect to any
application for access to the premises. The court may deny access to the
premises when the probative value of access to such location has been or
will be preserved by specified alternative means. If the court grants
access to the premises, the individual or entity with ownership or
possessory rights to the premises may request law enforcement presence
at the premises while defense counsel or a representative thereof is
present.
3. Discretionary discovery by order of the court. The court in its
discretion may, upon a showing by the defendant that the request is
reasonable and that the defendant is unable without undue hardship to
obtain the substantial equivalent by other means, order the prosecution,
or any individual, agency or other entity subject to the jurisdiction of
the court, to make available for disclosure to the defendant any
material or information which relates to the subject matter of the case
and is reasonably likely to be material. A motion under this subdivision
must be on notice to any person or entity affected by the order. The
court may, on its own, upon request of any person or entity affected by
the order, modify or vacate the order if compliance would be
unreasonable or will create significant hardship. For good cause shown,
the court may permit a party seeking or opposing a discretionary order
of discovery under this subdivision, or another affected person or
entity, to submit papers or testify on the record ex parte or in camera.
For good cause shown, any such papers and a transcript of such testimony
may be sealed and shall constitute a part of the record on appeal.
Court ordered procedures to facilitate compliance.
To facilitate compliance with this article, and to reduce or
streamline litigation of any disputes about discovery, the court in its
discretion may issue an order:
1. Requiring that the prosecutor and counsel for the defendant
diligently confer to attempt to reach an accommodation as to any dispute
concerning discovery prior to seeking a ruling from the court;
2. Requiring a discovery compliance conference at a specified time
prior to trial between the prosecutor, counsel for all defendants, and
the court or its staff;
3. Requiring the prosecution to file an additional certificate of
compliance that states that the prosecutor and/or an appropriate named
agent has made reasonable inquiries of all police officers and other
persons who have participated in investigating or evaluating the case
about the existence of any favorable evidence or information within
paragraph (k) of subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article,
including such evidence or information that was not reduced to writing
or otherwise memorialized or preserved as evidence, and has disclosed
any such information to the defendant; and/or
4. Requiring other measures or proceedings designed to carry into
effect the goals of this article.
Non-testimonial evidence from the defendant.
1. Availability. After the filing of an accusatory instrument, and
subject to constitutional limitations, the court may, upon motion of the
prosecution showing probable cause to believe the defendant has
committed the crime, a clear indication that relevant material evidence
will be found, and that the method used to secure such evidence is safe
and reliable, require a defendant to provide non-testimonial evidence,
including to:
(a) Appear in a lineup;
(b) Speak for identification by a witness or potential witness;
(c) Be fingerprinted;
(d) Pose for photographs not involving reenactment of an event;
(e) Permit the taking of samples of the defendant's blood, hair, and
other materials of the defendant's body that involves no unreasonable
intrusion thereof;
(f) Provide specimens of the defendant's handwriting; and
(g) Submit to a reasonable physical or medical inspection of the
defendant's body.
2. Limitations. This section shall not be construed to alter or in any
way affect the issuance of a similar court order, as may be authorized
by law, before the filing of an accusatory instrument, consistent with
such rights as the defendant may derive from the state constitution or
the United States constitution. This section shall not be construed to
alter or in any way affect the administration of a chemical test where
otherwise authorized. An order pursuant to this section may be denied,
limited or conditioned as provided in section 245.70 of this article.
DNA comparison order.
Where property in the prosecution's possession, custody, or control
consists of a deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") profile obtained from
probative biological material gathered in connection with the
investigation of the crime, or the defendant, or the prosecution of the
defendant, and the defendant establishes (a) that such profile complies
with federal bureau of investigation or state requirements, whichever
are applicable and as such requirements are applied to law enforcement
agencies seeking a keyboard search or similar comparison, and (b) that
the data meets state DNA index system or national DNA index system
criteria as such criteria are applied to law enforcement agencies
seeking such a keyboard search or similar comparison, the court may,
upon motion of a defendant against whom an indictment, superior court
information, prosecutor's information, information, or simplified
information is pending, order an entity that has access to the combined
DNA index system or its successor system to compare such DNA profile
against DNA databanks by keyboard searches, or a similar method that
does not involve uploading, upon notice to both parties and the entity
required to perform the search, upon a showing by the defendant that
such a comparison is material to the presentation of his or her defense
and that the request is reasonable. For purposes of this section, a
"keyboard search" shall mean a search of a DNA profile against the
databank in which the profile that is searched is not uploaded to or
maintained in the databank.
Certificates of compliance; readiness for trial.
1. By the prosecution. When the prosecution has, pursuant to this
section, exercised due diligence and acted in good faith in making
reasonable inquiries and efforts to obtain and provide the discovery
required by subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article, except
for discovery that is lost or destroyed as provided by paragraph (b) of
subdivision one of section 245.80 of this article and except for any
material or information that is the subject of an order pursuant to
section 245.70 of this article, it shall serve upon the defendant and
file with the court a certificate of compliance. The certificate of
compliance shall state that, after exercising due diligence and making
reasonable inquiries and efforts to ascertain the existence of, obtain,
and disclose material and information subject to discovery, the
prosecution has disclosed and made available all known material and
information it has obtained subject to discovery. It shall also identify
the items provided. The prosecution shall also identify the items that
the prosecution is required to disclose and of which the prosecution is
aware, but has been unable to obtain despite the exercise of due
diligence as evaluated under this section. If the prosecution provides
additional discovery prior to trial pursuant to section 245.60 of this
article, a supplemental certificate shall be served upon the defendant
and filed with the court identifying the additional material and
information provided. No adverse consequence to the prosecution or the
prosecutor shall result from the filing of a certificate of compliance
in good faith and reasonable under the circumstances; but the court may
grant a remedy or sanction for a discovery violation as provided in
section 245.80 of this article. The filing of a supplemental certificate
of compliance shall not impact the validity of the original certificate
of compliance if filed in good faith and after exercising due diligence
as assessed under this section.
1-a. Any supplemental certificate of compliance shall detail the basis
for the delayed disclosure so that the court may determine whether the
delayed disclosure impacts the propriety of the certificate of
compliance. The filing of a supplemental certificate of compliance shall
not impact the validity of the original certificate of compliance if
filed in good faith and after exercising due diligence pursuant to
section 245.20 of this article, or if the additional discovery did not
exist at the time of the filing of the original certificate of
compliance.
2. By the defendant. When the defendant has provided all discovery
required by subdivision four of section 245.20 of this article, except
for any items or information that are the subject of an order pursuant
to section 245.70 of this article, counsel for the defendant shall serve
upon the prosecution and file with the court a certificate of
compliance. The certificate shall state that, after exercising due
diligence and making reasonable inquiries to ascertain the existence of
material and information subject to discovery, counsel for the defendant
has disclosed and made available all known material and information
subject to discovery. It shall also identify the items provided. If
additional discovery is subsequently provided prior to trial pursuant to
section 245.60 of this article, a supplemental certificate shall be
served upon the prosecution and filed with the court identifying the
additional material and information provided. No adverse consequence to
the defendant or counsel for the defendant shall result from the filing
of a certificate of compliance in good faith; but the court may grant a
remedy or sanction for a discovery violation as provided in section
245.80 of this article.
3. Trial readiness. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law,
absent an individualized finding of special circumstances in the instant
case by the court before which the charge is pending, the prosecution
shall not be deemed ready for trial for purposes of section 30.30 of
this chapter until it has filed a valid certificate pursuant to
subdivision one of this section. A court may deem the prosecution ready
for trial pursuant to section 30.30 of this chapter where information
that might be considered discoverable under this article cannot be
disclosed because it has been lost, destroyed, or otherwise unavailable
as provided by paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 245.80 of
this article, despite diligent and good faith efforts, reasonable under
the circumstances. Provided, however, that the court may grant a remedy
or sanction for a discovery violation as provided by section 245.80 of
this article.
4. Challenges. (a) Challenges to, or questions related to a
certificate of compliance shall be addressed by motion.
(b) To the extent that the party is aware of a potential defect or
deficiency related to a certificate of compliance or supplemental
certificate of compliance, the party entitled to disclosure shall notify
or alert the opposing party in accordance with the procedure set forth
in this subdivision.
(c) Challenges to the validity of a certificate of compliance or
supplemental certificates of compliance served on the defense and filed
with the court pursuant to subdivision one of this section shall be
addressed by motion within thirty-five days of the service of the
certificate provided that the prosecution has filed an indictment or
information prior to filing the certificate of compliance. Nothing in
this section shall be construed to waive a party's right to file a
motion pursuant to section 30.30 of this chapter on grounds unrelated to
the validity of a certificate of compliance. Provided, however, that any
challenges to a certificate of compliance or supplemental certificate of
compliance shall be accompanied by an affirmation by the moving party
that, after the filing of the opposing party's certificate of
compliance, such moving party timely conferred in good faith or timely
made good faith efforts to confer with the opposing party regarding the
specific and particularized matters forming the basis for such
challenge, that efforts to obtain the missing discovery from the
opposing party or otherwise resolve the issues raised were unsuccessful,
and that no accommodation could be reached. For the purposes of this
subdivision, the parties may confer informally, including but not
limited to communication by email, telephone, or any other reasonable
means.
(i) Upon request, the court may extend the time period to challenge a
certificate of compliance or supplemental certificate of compliance
beyond the thirty-five days for good cause shown. A request for
extension shall be made before the expiration of the thirty-five days.
Unless the court finds that the prosecutor unreasonably delayed in
responding to the defense's good faith efforts to confer or that the
prosecutor did not file the certificate of compliance in good faith, any
such extension shall be excluded from a speedy trial calculation
pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision four of section 30.30 of this
chapter.
(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, a party may
challenge the validity of the certificate of compliance after the
expiration of the thirty-five day period where the grounds for such
challenge are based upon a material change in circumstances, including
but not limited to the belated disclosure of discoverable material
pursuant to section 245.20 of this article, or, where the party entitled
to disclosure could not, with due diligence, have known of the specific
and particularized matters forming the basis of the challenge prior to
the expiration of such period.
(iii) Nothing in this subdivision shall limit the court's authority to
facilitate compliance pursuant to section 245.35 of this article. Any
extension of time granted pursuant to section 245.35 shall be excluded
from a speedy trial calculation pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision
four of section 30.30 of this chapter.
5. Assessing due diligence. In assessing a party's due diligence, the
court shall look at the totality of the party's efforts to comply with
the provisions of this article, rather than assess the party's efforts
item by item.
(a) Relevant factors for assessing the prosecutor's due diligence
include, but are not limited to: the efforts made by the prosecutor to
comply with the requirements of this article; the volume of discovery
provided and the volume of discovery outstanding; the complexity of the
case; whether the prosecutor knew that the belatedly disclosed or
allegedly missing material existed; the explanation for any alleged
discovery lapse; the prosecutor's response when apprised of any
allegedly missing discovery; whether the belated discovery was
substantively duplicative, insignificant, or easily remedied; whether
the omission was corrected; whether the prosecution self-reported the
error and took prompt remedial action without court intervention; and
whether the prosecution's delayed disclosure of discovery was
prejudicial to the defense or otherwise impeded the defense's ability to
effectively investigate the case or prepare for trial.
(b) The court's determination shall be based on consideration of all
factors listed in paragraph (a) of this subdivision and no one factor
shall be determinative. The court shall explain the basis for its
determination on the record or in writing.
(c) A finding of a valid certificate under this section shall
constitute a valid certificate pursuant to subdivision five of section
30.30 of this chapter. Upon a finding of a valid certificate, the court
shall, if warranted, fashion an appropriate and proportional remedy for
any discovery violation resulting from the belated disclosure pursuant
to subdivision two of section 245.80 of this article.
6. Determinations by the court. Notwithstanding any other section of
law to the contrary, a court shall not invalidate a certificate of
compliance where the party has exercised due diligence and acted in good
faith in making reasonable inquiries and efforts to obtain and provide
the material required to be disclosed pursuant to section 245.20 of this
article.
Flow of information.
1. Sufficient communication for compliance. The district attorney and
the assistant responsible for the case, or, if the matter is not being
prosecuted by the district attorney, the prosecuting agency and its
assigned representative, shall endeavor to ensure that a flow of
information is maintained between the police and other investigative
personnel and his or her office sufficient to place within his or her
possession or control all material and information pertinent to the
defendant and the offense or offenses charged, including, but not
limited to, any evidence or information discoverable under paragraph (k)
of subdivision one of section 245.20 of this article.
2. Provision of law enforcement agency files. Absent a court order or
a requirement that defense counsel obtain a security clearance mandated
by law or authorized government regulation, upon request by the
prosecution, each New York state and local law enforcement agency shall
make available to the prosecution a complete copy of its complete
records and files related to the investigation of the case or the
prosecution of the defendant for compliance with this article.
3. 911 telephone call and police radio transmission electronic
recordings, police worn body camera recordings and other police
recordings. (a) Whenever an electronic recording of a 911 telephone call
or a police radio transmission or video or audio footage from a police
body-worn camera or other police recording was made or received in
connection with the investigation of an apparent criminal incident, the
arresting officer or lead detective shall expeditiously notify the
prosecution in writing upon the filing of an accusatory instrument of
the existence of all such known recordings. The prosecution shall
expeditiously take whatever reasonable steps are necessary to ensure
that all known electronic recordings of 911 telephone calls, police
radio transmissions and video and audio footage and other police
recordings made or available in connection with the case are preserved.
Upon the defendant's timely request and designation of a specific
electronic recording of a 911 telephone call, the prosecution shall also
expeditiously take whatever reasonable steps are necessary to ensure
that it is preserved.
(b) If the prosecution fails to disclose such an electronic recording
to the defendant pursuant to paragraph (e), (g) or (k) of subdivision
one of section 245.20 of this article due to a failure to comply with
this obligation by police officers or other law enforcement or
prosecution personnel, the court upon motion of the defendant shall
impose an appropriate remedy or sanction pursuant to section 245.80 of
this article.
Continuing duty to disclose.
If either the prosecution or the defendant subsequently learns of
additional material or information which it would have been under a duty
to disclose pursuant to any provisions of this article had it known of
it at the time of a previous discovery obligation or discovery order, it
shall expeditiously notify the other party and disclose the additional
material and information as required for initial discovery under this
article. This section also requires expeditious disclosure by the
prosecution of material or information that became relevant to the case
or discoverable based on reciprocal discovery received from the
defendant pursuant to subdivision four of section 245.20 of this
article.
Work product.
This article does not authorize discovery by a party of those portions
of records, reports, correspondence, memoranda, or internal documents of
the adverse party which are only the legal research, opinions, theories
or conclusions of the adverse party or its attorney or the attorney's
agents, or of statements of a defendant, written or recorded or
summarized in any writing or recording, made to the attorney for the
defendant or the attorney's agents.
Protective orders.
1. Any discovery subject to protective order. Upon a showing of good
cause by either party, the court may at any time order that discovery or
inspection of any kind of material or information under this article be
denied, restricted, conditioned or deferred, or make such other order as
is appropriate, including, for 911 calls, allowing the disclosure of a
transcript of an audio recording in lieu of the recording. The court may
impose as a condition on discovery to a defendant that the material or
information to be discovered be available only to counsel for the
defendant; or, alternatively, that counsel for the defendant, and
persons employed by the attorney or appointed by the court to assist in
the preparation of a defendant's case, may not disclose physical copies
of the discoverable documents to a defendant or to anyone else, provided
that the prosecution affords the defendant access to inspect redacted
copies of the discoverable documents at a supervised location that
provides regular and reasonable hours for such access, such as a
prosecutor's office, police station, facility of detention, or court.
Should the court impose as a condition that some material or information
be available only to counsel for the defendant, the court shall inform
the defendant on the record that his or her attorney is not permitted by
law to disclose such material or information to the defendant. The court
may permit a party seeking or opposing a protective order under this
section, or another affected person, to submit papers or testify on the
record ex parte or in camera. Any such papers and a transcript of such
testimony may be sealed and shall constitute a part of the record on
appeal. This section does not alter the allocation of the burden of
proof with regard to matters at issue, including privilege.
2. Modification of time periods for discovery. Upon motion of a party
in an individual case, the court may alter the time periods for
discovery imposed by this article upon a showing of good cause.
3. Prompt hearing. Upon request for a protective order, unless the
defendant voluntarily consents to the people's request for a protective
order, the court shall conduct an appropriate hearing within three
business days to determine whether good cause has been shown and when
practicable shall render a decision expeditiously. Any materials
submitted and a transcript of the proceeding may be sealed and shall
constitute a part of the record on appeal. When the defendant is charged
with a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal
law, or any class A felony other than those defined in article two
hundred twenty of the penal law, the court may, at the prosecutor's
request, for good cause shown, conduct such hearing in camera and
outside the presence of the defendant, provided however that this shall
not affect the rights of the court to receive testimony or papers
ex-parte or in camera as provided in subdivision one of this section.
4. Showing of good cause. In determining good cause under this section
the court may consider: constitutional rights or limitations; danger to
the integrity of physical evidence or the safety of a witness; risk of
intimidation, economic reprisal, bribery, harassment or unjustified
annoyance or embarrassment to any person, and the nature, severity and
likelihood of that risk; a risk of an adverse effect upon the legitimate
needs of law enforcement, including the protection of the
confidentiality of informants, and the nature, severity and likelihood
of that risk; the nature and circumstances of the factual allegations in
the case; whether the defendant has a history of witness intimidation or
tampering and the nature of that history; the nature of the stated
reasons in support of a protective order; the nature of the witness
identifying information that is sought to be addressed by a protective
order, including the option of employing adequate alternative contact
information; danger to any person stemming from factors such as a
defendant's substantiated affiliation with a criminal enterprise as
defined in subdivision three of section 460.10 of the penal law; and
other similar factors found to outweigh the usefulness of the discovery.
5. Successor counsel or pro se defendant. In cases in which the
attorney-client relationship is terminated prior to trial for any
reason, any material or information disclosed subject to a condition
that it be available only to counsel for the defendant, or limited in
dissemination by protective order or otherwise, shall be provided only
to successor counsel for the defendant under the same condition or
conditions or be returned to the prosecution, unless the court rules
otherwise for good cause shown or the prosecutor gives written consent.
Any work product derived from such material or information shall not be
provided to the defendant, unless the court rules otherwise or the
prosecutor gives written consent. If the defendant is acting as his or
her own attorney, the court may regulate the time, place and manner of
access to any discoverable material or information; and it may as
appropriate appoint persons to assist the defendant in the investigation
or preparation of the case. Upon motion or application of a defendant
acting as his or her own attorney, the court may at any time modify or
vacate any condition or restriction relating to access to discoverable
material or information, for good cause shown.
6. Expedited review of adverse ruling. (a) A party that has
unsuccessfully sought, or unsuccessfully opposed the granting of, a
protective order under this section relating to the name, address,
contact information or statements of a person may obtain expedited
review of that ruling by an individual justice of the intermediate
appellate court to which an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the
case would be taken.
(b) Such review shall be sought within two business days of the
adverse or partially adverse ruling, by order to show cause filed with
the intermediate appellate court. The order to show cause shall in
addition be timely served on the lower court and on the opposing party,
and shall be accompanied by a sworn affirmation stating in good faith
(i) that the ruling affects substantial interests, and (ii) that
diligent efforts to reach an accommodation of the underlying discovery
dispute with opposing counsel failed or that no accommodation was
feasible; except that service on the opposing party, and a statement
regarding efforts to reach an accommodation, are unnecessary where the
opposing party was not made aware of the application for a protective
order and good cause is shown for omitting service of the order to show
cause on the opposing party. The lower court's order subject to review
shall be stayed until the appellate justice renders a determination.
(c) The assignment of the individual appellate justice, and the mode
of and procedure for the review, shall be determined by rules of the
individual appellate courts. The appellate justice may consider any
relevant and reliable information bearing on the issue, and may dispense
with written briefs other than supporting and opposing materials
previously submitted to the lower court. The appellate justice may
dispense with the issuance of a written opinion in rendering his or her
decision, and when practicable shall render decision and order
expeditiously. Such review, decision and order shall not affect the
right of a defendant, in a subsequent appeal from a judgment of
conviction, to claim as error the ruling reviewed.
7. Compliance with protective order. Any protective order issued under
this article is a mandate of the court for purposes of the offense of
criminal contempt in subdivision three of section 215.50 of the penal
law.
8. A motion filed in good faith pursuant to subdivision one or two of
this section shall be deemed a pre-trial motion for the purposes of
paragraph (a) of subdivision four of section 30.30 of this chapter.
Waiver of discovery by defendant.
1. A defendant who does not seek discovery from the prosecution under
this article shall so notify the prosecution and the court at the
defendant's arraignment on an indictment, superior court information,
prosecutor's information, information, or simplified information, or
expeditiously thereafter but before receiving discovery from the
prosecution pursuant to subdivision one of section 245.20 of this
article, and the defendant need not provide discovery to the prosecution
pursuant to subdivision four of section 245.20 and section 245.60 of
this article. A waiver shall be in writing, signed for the individual
case by the counsel for the defendant and filed with the court. The
court shall inquire of the defendant on the record to ensure that the
defendant understands his or her right to discovery and right to waive
discovery. Such a waiver does not alter or in any way affect the
procedures, obligations or rights set forth in sections 250.10, 250.20
and 250.30 of this title, or otherwise established or required by law.
The prosecution may not condition a guilty plea offer on the defense's
execution of a waiver under this section. Counsel for the defendant may
advise his or her client about the defendant's right to discovery and
right to waive discovery; such advice shall not constitute a condition
of a guilty plea.
2. Nothing in this section shall prevent the waiver of discovery from
being a condition of the repleader, where the defendant's original
conviction is vacated on agreement between the parties pursuant to
section 440.10 of this part.
Remedies or sanctions for non-compliance.
1. Need for remedy or sanction. (a) When material or information is
discoverable under this article but is disclosed belatedly, the court
shall impose a remedy or sanction that is appropriate and proportionate
to the prejudice suffered by the party entitled to disclosure.
Regardless of a showing of prejudice the party entitled to disclosure
shall be given reasonable time to prepare and respond to the new
material.
(b) When material or information is discoverable under this article
but cannot be disclosed because it has been lost or destroyed, the court
shall impose an appropriate remedy or sanction if the party entitled to
disclosure shows that the lost or destroyed material may have contained
some information relevant to a contested issue. The appropriate remedy
or sanction is that which is proportionate to the potential ways in
which the lost or destroyed material reasonably could have been helpful
to the party entitled to disclosure.
2. Available remedies or sanctions. For failure to comply with any
discovery order imposed or issued pursuant to this article, the court
may make a further order for discovery, grant a continuance, order that
a hearing be reopened, order that a witness be called or recalled,
instruct the jury that it may draw an adverse inference regarding the
non-compliance, preclude or strike a witness's testimony or a portion of
a witness's testimony, admit or exclude evidence, order a mistrial,
order the dismissal of all or some of the charges provided that, after
considering all other remedies, dismissal is appropriate and
proportionate to the prejudice suffered by the party entitled to
disclosure, or make such other order as it deems just under the
circumstances; except that any sanction against the defendant shall
comport with the defendant's constitutional right to present a defense,
and precluding a defense witness from testifying shall be permissible
only upon a finding that the defendant's failure to comply with the
discovery obligation or order was willful and motivated by a desire to
obtain a tactical advantage.
3. Consequences of non-disclosure of statement of testifying
prosecution witness. The failure of the prosecutor or any agent of the
prosecutor to disclose any written or recorded statement made by a
prosecution witness which relates to the subject matter of the witness's
testimony shall not constitute grounds for any court to order a new
pre-trial hearing or set aside a conviction, or reverse, modify or
vacate a judgment of conviction, in the absence of a showing by the
defendant that there is a reasonable possibility that the non-disclosure
materially contributed to the result of the trial or other proceeding;
provided, however, that nothing in this section shall affect or limit
any right the defendant may have to a reopened pre-trial hearing when
such statements were disclosed before the close of evidence at trial.
Admissibility of discovery.
The fact that a party has indicated during the discovery process an
intention to offer specified evidence or to call a specified witness is
not admissible in evidence or grounds for adverse comment at a hearing
or a trial.
Federal and state constitutional obligations.
Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit the people's
obligations to comply with federal and state constitutional law.
ARTICLE 250 Pre-trial Notices of Defenses
Notice of intent to proffer psychiatric evidence; examination
of defendant upon application of prosecutor.
1. As used in this section, the term "psychiatric evidence" means:
(a) Evidence of mental disease or defect to be offered by the
defendant in connection with the affirmative defense of lack of criminal
responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect.
(b) Evidence of mental disease or defect to be offered by the
defendant in connection with the affirmative defense of extreme
emotional disturbance as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
section 125.25 of the penal law and paragraph (a) of subdivision two of
section 125.27 of the penal law.
(c) Evidence of mental disease or defect to be offered by the
defendant in connection with any other defense not specified in the
preceding paragraphs.
2. Psychiatric evidence is not admissible upon a trial unless the
defendant serves upon the people and files with the court a written
notice of his intention to present psychiatric evidence. Such notice
must be served and filed before trial and not more than thirty days
after entry of the plea of not guilty to the indictment. In the
interest of justice and for good cause shown, however, the court may
permit such service and filing to be made at any later time prior to the
close of the evidence.
3. When a defendant, pursuant to subdivision two of this section,
serves notice of intent to present psychiatric evidence, the district
attorney may apply to the court, upon notice to the defendant, for an
order directing that the defendant submit to an examination by a
psychiatrist or licensed psychologist as defined in article one hundred
fifty-three of the education law designated by the district attorney. If
the application is granted, the psychiatrist or psychologist designated
to conduct the examination must notify the district attorney and counsel
for the defendant of the time and place of the examination. Defendant
has a right to have his counsel present at such examination. The
district attorney may also be present. The role of each counsel at such
examination is that of an observer, and neither counsel shall be
permitted to take an active role at the examination.
4. After the conclusion of the examination, the psychiatrist or
psychologist must promptly prepare a written report of his findings and
evaluation. A copy of such report must be made available to the district
attorney and to the counsel for the defendant. No transcript or
recording of the examination is required, but if one is made, it shall
be made available to both parties prior to the trial.
5. If the court finds that the defendant has willfully refused to
cooperate fully in the examination ordered pursuant to subdivision three
of this section it may preclude introduction of testimony by a
psychiatrist or psychologist concerning mental disease or defect of the
defendant at trial. Where, however, the defendant has other proof of his
affirmative defense, and the court has found that the defendant did not
submit to or cooperate fully in the examination ordered by the court,
this other evidence, if otherwise competent, shall be admissible. In
such case, the court must instruct the jury that the defendant did not
submit to or cooperate fully in the pre-trial psychiatric examination
ordered by the court pursuant to subdivision three of this section and
that such failure may be considered in determining the merits of the
affirmative defense.
Notice of alibi.
1. At any time, not more than twenty days after arraignment, the
people may serve upon the defendant or his counsel, and file a copy
thereof with the court, a demand that if the defendant intends to offer
a trial defense that at the time of the commission of the crime charged
he was at some place or places other than the scene of the crime, and to
call witnesses in support of such defense, he must, within eight days of
service of such demand, serve upon the people, and file a copy thereof
with the court, a "notice of alibi," reciting (a) the place or places
where the defendant claims to have been at the time in question, and (b)
the names, the residential addresses, the places of employment and the
addresses thereof of every such alibi witness upon whom he intends to
rely. For good cause shown, the court may extend the period for service
of the notice.
2. Within a reasonable time after receipt of the defendant's witness
list but not later than ten days before trial, the people must serve
upon the defendant or his counsel, and file a copy thereof with the
court, a list of the witnesses the people propose to offer in rebuttal
to discredit the defendant's alibi at the trial together with the
residential addresses, the places of employment and the addresses
thereof of any such rebuttal witnesses. A witness who will testify
that the defendant was at the scene of the crime is not such an alibi
rebuttal witness. For good cause shown, the court may extend the period
for service of the list of witnesses by the people.
3. If at the trial the defendant calls such an alibi witness without
having served the demanded notice of alibi, or if having served such a
notice he calls a witness not specified therein, the court may exclude
any testimony of such witness relating to the alibi defense. The court
may in its discretion receive such testimony, but before doing so, it
must, upon application of the people, grant an adjournment not in excess
of three days.
4. Similarly, if the people fail to serve and file a list of any
rebuttal witnesses, the provisions of subdivision three, above, shall
reciprocally apply.
5. Both the defendant and the people shall be under a continuing duty
to promptly disclose the names and addresses of additional witnesses
which come to the attention of either party subsequent to filing their
witness lists as provided in this section.
Notice of defenses in offenses involving computers.
1. In any prosecution in which the defendant seeks to invoke any of
the defenses specified in section 156.50 of the penal law, the defendant
must within forty-five days after arraignment and not less than twenty
days before the commencement of the trial serve upon the people and file
with the court a written notice of his intention to present such
defense. For good cause shown, the court may extend the period for
service of the notice.
2. The notice served must specify the subdivision or subdivisions upon
which the defendant relies and must also state the reasonable grounds
that led the defendant to believe that he had the authorization required
by the statute or the right required by the statute to engage in such
conduct.
3. If at the trial the defendant seeks to invoke any of the defenses
specified in section 156.50 of the penal law without having served the
notice as required, or seeks to invoke a subdivision or a ground not
specified in the notice, the court may exclude any testimony or evidence
in regard to the defense, or any subdivision or ground, not noticed. The
court may in its discretion, for good cause shown, receive such
testimony or evidence, but before doing so, it may, upon application of
the people, grant an adjournment.
Notice of intent to seek death penalty.
1. A sentence of death may not be imposed upon a defendant convicted
of murder in the first degree unless, pursuant to subdivision two of
this section, the people file with the court and serve upon the
defendant a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.
2. In any prosecution in which the people seek a sentence of death,
the people shall, within one hundred twenty days of the defendant's
arraignment upon an indictment charging the defendant with murder in the
first degree, serve upon the defendant and file with the court in which
the indictment is pending a written notice of intention to seek the
death penalty. For good cause shown the court may extend the period for
service and filing of the notice.
3. Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, where the people file
a notice of intent to seek the death penalty pursuant to this section
the defendant shall be entitled to an additional sixty days for the
purpose of filing new motions or supplementing pending motions.
4. A notice of intent to seek the death penalty may be withdrawn at
any time by a written notice of withdrawal filed with the court and
served upon the defendant. Once withdrawn the notice of intent to seek
the death penalty may not be refiled.
ARTICLE 255 Pre-trial Motions
Definitions.
1. "Pre-trial motion" as used in this article means any motion by a
defendant which seeks an order of the court:
(a) dismissing or reducing an indictment pursuant to article 210 or
removing an action to the family court pursuant to article 722; or
(b) dismissing an information, prosecutor's information, simplified
information or misdemeanor complaint pursuant to article 170; or
(c) granting discovery pursuant to article 245; or
(d) granting a bill of particulars pursuant to sections 100.45 or
200.90; or
(e) removing the action pursuant to sections 170.15, 230.20 or 230.30;
or
(f) suppressing the use at trial of any evidence pursuant to article
710; or
(g) granting separate trials pursuant to article 100 or 200.
Pre-trial motions; procedure.
1. Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, whether the
defendant is represented by counsel or elects to proceed pro se, all
pre-trial motions shall be served or filed within forty-five days after
arraignment and before commencement of trial, or within such additional
time as the court may fix upon application of the defendant made prior
to entry of judgment. In an action in which either (a) material or
information has been disclosed pursuant to paragraph (m) or (n) of
subdivision one of section 245.20 of this title, (b) an eavesdropping
warrant and application have been furnished pursuant to section 700.70
of this chapter, or (c) a notice of intention to introduce evidence has
been served pursuant to section 710.30 of this chapter, such period
shall be extended until forty-five days after the last date of such
service. If the defendant is not represented by counsel and has
requested an adjournment to obtain counsel or to have counsel assigned,
such forty-five day period shall commence on the date counsel initially
appears on defendant's behalf.
2. All pre-trial motions, with supporting affidavits, affirmations,
exhibits and memoranda of law, whenever practicable, shall be included
within the same set of motion papers, and shall be made returnable on
the same date, unless the defendant shows that it would be prejudicial
to the defense were a single judge to consider all the pre-trial
motions. Where one motion seeks to provide the basis for making another
motion, it shall be deemed impracticable to include both motions in the
same set of motion papers pursuant to this subdivision.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions one and two hereof,
the court must entertain and decide on its merits, at anytime before the
end of the trial, any appropriate pre-trial motion based upon grounds of
which the defendant could not, with due diligence, have been previously
aware, or which, for other good cause, could not reasonably have been
raised within the period specified in subdivision one of this section or
included within the single set of motion papers as required by
subdivision two. Any other pre-trial motion made after the forty-five
day period may be summarily denied, but the court, in the interest of
justice, and for good cause shown, may, in its discretion, at any time
before sentence, entertain and dispose of the motion on the merits.
4. Any pre-trial motion, whether made before or after expiration of
the period specified in subdivision one of this section, may be referred
by the court to a judicial hearing officer who shall entertain it in the
same manner as a court. In the discharge of this responsibility, the
judicial hearing officer shall have the same powers as a judge of the
court making the assignment, except that the judicial hearing officer
shall not determine the motion but shall file a report with the court
setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law. The rules of
evidence shall be applicable at any hearing conducted hereunder by a
judicial hearing officer. A transcript of any testimony taken, together
with the exhibits or copies thereof, shall be filed with the report. The
court shall determine the motion on the motion papers, affidavits and
other documents submitted by the parties thereto, the record of the
hearing before the judicial hearing officer, and the judicial hearing
officer's report.
ARTICLE 260 Jury Trial--generally
Jury trial; requirement thereof.
Except as otherwise provided in section 320.10, every trial of an
indictment must be a jury trial.
Jury trial; defendant's presence at trial.
A defendant must be personally present during the trial of an
indictment; provided, however, that a defendant who conducts himself in
so disorderly and disruptive a manner that his trial cannot be carried
on with him in the courtroom may be removed from the courtroom if, after
he has been warned by the court that he will be removed if he continues
such conduct, he continues to engage in such conduct.
Jury trial; in what order to proceed.
The order of a jury trial, in general, is as follows:
1. The jury must be selected and sworn.
2. The court must deliver preliminary instructions to the jury.
3. The people must deliver an opening address to the jury.
4. The defendant may deliver an opening address to the jury.
5. The people must offer evidence in support of the indictment.
6. The defendant may offer evidence in his defense.
7. The people may offer evidence in rebuttal of the defense evidence,
and the defendant may then offer evidence in rebuttal of the people's
rebuttal evidence. The court may in its discretion permit the parties
to offer further rebuttal or surrebuttal evidence in this pattern. In
the interest of justice, the court may permit either party to offer
evidence upon rebuttal which is not technically of a rebuttal nature but
more properly a part of the offering party's original case.
8. At the conclusion of the evidence, the defendant may deliver a
summation to the jury.
9. The people may then deliver a summation to the jury.
10. The court must then deliver a charge to the jury.
11. The jury must then retire to deliberate and, if possible, render
a verdict.
ARTICLE 270 Jury Trial--formation and Conduct of Jury
Trial jury; formation in general.
1. A trial jury consists of twelve jurors, but "alternate jurors" may
be selected and sworn pursuant to section 270.30.
2. The panel from which the jury is drawn is formed and selected as
prescribed in the judiciary law. The first twelve members of the panel
returned for the term who appear as their names are drawn and called,
and who are not excluded as prescribed by this article, must be sworn
and thereupon constitute the trial jury.
Trial jury; challenge to the panel.
1. A challenge to the panel is an objection made to the entire panel
of prospective trial jurors returned for the term and may be taken to
such panel or to any additional panel that may be ordered by the court.
Such a challenge may be made only by the defendant and only on the
ground that there has been such a departure from the requirements of the
judiciary law in the drawing or return of the panel as to result in
substantial prejudice to the defendant.
2. A challenge to the panel must be made before the selection of the
jury commences, and, if it is not, such challenge is deemed to have been
waived. Such challenge must be made in writing setting forth the facts
constituting the ground of challenge. If such facts are denied by the
people, witnesses may be called and examined by either party. All
issues of fact and law arising on the challenge must be tried and
determined by the court. If a challenge to the panel is allowed, the
court must discharge that panel and order another panel of prospective
trial jurors returned for the term.
Trial jury; examination of prospective jurors; challenges
generally.
1. (a) If no challenge to the panel is made as prescribed by section
270.10 of this article, or if such challenge is made and disallowed, the
court shall direct that the names of not less than twelve members of the
panel be drawn and called as prescribed by the judiciary law, except as
otherwise required by this section. Such persons shall take their places
in the jury box and shall be immediately sworn to answer truthfully
questions asked them relative to their qualifications to serve as jurors
in the action. In its discretion, the court may require prospective
jurors to complete a questionnaire concerning their ability to serve as
fair and impartial jurors, including but not limited to place of birth,
current address, education, occupation, prior jury service, knowledge
of, relationship to, or contact with the court, any party, witness or
attorney in the action and any other fact relevant to his or her service
on the jury. An official form for such questionnaire shall be developed
by the chief administrator of the courts in consultation with the
administrative board of the courts. A copy of questionnaires completed
by the members of the panel shall be given to the court and each
attorney prior to examination of prospective jurors.
(b) The court shall initiate the examination of prospective jurors by
identifying the parties and their respective counsel and briefly
outlining the nature of case to all the prospective jurors. The court
shall then put to the members of the panel who have been sworn pursuant
to this subdivision and to any prospective jurors subsequently sworn,
questions affecting their qualifications to serve as jurors in the
action.
(c) The court shall permit both parties, commencing with the people,
to examine the prospective jurors, individually or collectively,
regarding their qualifications to serve as jurors. Each party shall be
afforded a fair opportunity to question the prospective jurors as to any
unexplored matter affecting their qualifications, but the court shall
not permit questioning that is repetitious or irrelevant, or questions
as to a juror's knowledge of rules of law. If necessary to prevent
improper questioning as to any matter, the court shall personally
examine the prospective jurors as to that matter. The scope of such
examination shall be within the discretion of the court. After the
parties have concluded their examinations of the prospective jurors, the
court may ask such further questions as it deems proper regarding the
qualifications of such prospective jurors.
1-a. The court may, upon a finding that there is good cause to believe
that a threat to the safety or integrity of the jury exists, upon motion
of either party or any affected person or upon its own initiative, issue
a protective order for a stated period regulating disclosure of the
names and the business or residential address of any prospective or
sworn juror to any person or persons, other than to counsel for either
party. In determining whether good cause exists, the court may consider:
(a) whether the defendant or persons acting on behalf of the defendant
have bribed, tampered with, or caused or attempted to cause physical
injury to or harassed a juror or prospective juror in another criminal
action or proceeding or in the instant criminal action or proceeding;
(b) the seriousness of the charges against the defendant, including
whether the defendant is charged with participating in a large-scale
criminal enterprise; and
(c) the extent of pretrial publicity concerning the criminal action or
proceeding.
1-b. If the court determines that a protective order should be issued
and that all jurors or prospective jurors shall be identified by some
means other than their names and business or residential addresses, the
court shall instruct the jury that the fact that the jury was selected
on an anonymous basis is not a factor from which any inference
unfavorable to the defendant may be drawn.
2. Upon the completion of such examination by both parties, each,
commencing with the people, may challenge a prospective juror for cause,
as prescribed by section 270.20. If such challenge is allowed, the
prospective juror must be excluded from service. After both parties have
had an opportunity to challenge for cause, the court must permit them to
peremptorily challenge any remaining prospective juror, as prescribed by
section 270.25, and such juror must be excluded from service. The people
must exercise their peremptory challenges first and may not, after the
defendant has exercised his peremptory challenges, make such a challenge
to any remaining prospective juror who is then in the jury box. If
either party so requests, challenges for cause must be made and
determined, and peremptory challenges must be made, within the courtroom
but outside of the hearing of the prospective jurors in such manner as
not to disclose which party made the challenge. The prospective jurors
who are not excluded from service must retain their place in the jury
box and must be immediately sworn as trial jurors. They must be sworn to
try the action in a just and impartial manner, to the best of their
judgment, and to render a verdict according to the law and the evidence.
3. The court may thereupon direct that the persons excluded be
replaced in the jury box by an equal number from the panel or, in its
discretion, direct that all sworn jurors be removed from the jury box
and that the jury box be occupied by such additional number of persons
from the panel as the court shall direct. In the court's discretion,
sworn jurors who are removed from the jury box as provided herein may be
seated elsewhere in the courtroom separate and apart from the unsworn
members of the panel or may be removed to the jury room or be allowed to
leave the courthouse. The process of jury selection as prescribed herein
shall continue until twelve persons are selected and sworn as trial
jurors. The juror whose name was first drawn and called must be
designated by the court as the foreperson, and no special oath need be
administered to him or her. If before twelve jurors are sworn, a juror
already sworn becomes unable to serve by reason of illness or other
incapacity, the court must discharge him or her and the selection of the
trial jury must be completed in the manner prescribed in this section.
4. A challenge for cause of a prospective juror which is not made
before he is sworn as a trial juror shall be deemed to have been waived,
except that such a challenge based upon a ground not known to the
challenging party at that time may be made at any time before a witness
is sworn at the trial. If such challenge is allowed by the court, the
juror shall be discharged and the selection of the trial jury shall be
completed in the manner prescribed in this section, except that if
alternate jurors have been sworn, the alternate juror whose name was
first drawn and called shall take the place of the juror so discharged.
Capital cases; individual questioning for racial bias.
1. In any case in which the crime charged may be punishable by death,
the court shall, upon motion of either party, permit the parties,
commencing with the people, to examine the prospective jurors
individually and outside the presence of the other prospective jurors
regarding their qualifications to serve as jurors. Each party shall be
afforded a fair opportunity to question a prospective juror as to any
unexplored matter affecting his or her qualifications, including without
limitation the possibility of racial bias on the part of the prospective
juror, but the court shall not permit questioning that is repetitious or
irrelevant, or questions as to a prospective juror's knowledge of rules
of law. If necessary to prevent improper questioning as to any matter,
the court shall personally examine the prospective jurors as to that
matter. The scope of such examination shall be within the discretion of
the court. After the parties have concluded their examinations of a
prospective juror, the court may ask such further questions as it deems
proper regarding the qualifications of the prospective juror.
2. The proceedings provided for in this section shall be conducted on
the record; provided, however, that upon motion of either party, and for
good cause shown, the court may direct that all or a portion of the
record of such proceedings be sealed.
Trial jury; challenge for cause of an individual juror.
1. A challenge for cause is an objection to a prospective juror and
may be made only on the ground that:
(a) He does not have the qualifications required by the judiciary
law; or
(b) He has a state of mind that is likely to preclude him from
rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at the
trial; or
(c) He is related within the sixth degree by consanguinity or
affinity to the defendant, or to the person allegedly injured by the
crime charged, or to a prospective witness at the trial, or to counsel
for the people or for the defendant; or that he is or was a party
adverse to any such person in a civil action; or that he has complained
against or been accused by any such person in a criminal action; or that
he bears some other relationship to any such person of such nature that
it is likely to preclude him from rendering an impartial verdict; or
(d) He was a witness at the preliminary examination or before the
grand jury or is to be a witness at the trial; or
(e) He served on the grand jury which found the indictment in issue
or served on a trial jury in a prior civil or criminal action involving
the same incident charged in such indictment; or
(f) The crime charged may be punishable by death and the prospective
juror entertains such conscientious opinions either against or in favor
of such punishment as to preclude such juror from rendering an impartial
verdict or from properly exercising the discretion conferred upon such
juror by law in the determination of a sentence pursuant to section
2. All issues of fact or law arising on the challenge must be tried
and determined by the court. If the challenge is allowed, the court
must exclude the person challenged from service. An erroneous ruling by
the court allowing a challenge for cause by the people does not
constitute reversible error unless the people have exhausted their
peremptory challenges at the time or exhaust them before the selection
of the jury is complete. An erroneous ruling by the court denying a
challenge for cause by the defendant does not constitute reversible
error unless the defendant has exhausted his peremptory challenges at
the time or, if he has not, he peremptorily challenges such prospective
juror and his peremptory challenges are exhausted before the selection
of the jury is complete.
Trial jury; peremptory challenge of an individual juror.
1. A peremptory challenge is an objection to a prospective juror for
which no reason need be assigned. Upon any peremptory challenge, the
court must exclude the person challenged from service.
2. Each party must be allowed the following number of peremptory
challenges:
(a) Twenty for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a
class A felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(b) Fifteen for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a
class B or class C felony, and two for each alternate juror to be
selected.
(c) Ten for the regular jurors in all other cases, and two for each
alternate juror to be selected.
3. When two or more defendants are tried jointly, the number of
peremptory challenges prescribed in subdivision two of this section is
not multiplied by the number of defendants, but such defendants are to
be treated as a single party. In any such case, a peremptory challenge
by one or more defendants must be allowed if a majority of the
defendants join in such challenge, or if there is a tie when there is an
even number of defendants. Otherwise, it must be disallowed.
Trial jury; alternate jurors.
1. Immediately after the last trial juror is sworn, the court may in
its discretion direct the selection of one or more, but not more than
six additional jurors to be known as "alternate jurors", except that, in
a prosecution under section 125.27 of the penal law, the court may, in
its discretion, direct the selection of as many alternate jurors as the
court determines to be appropriate. Alternate jurors must be drawn in
the same manner, must have the same qualifications, must be subject to
the same examination and challenges for cause and must take the same
oath as the regular jurors. After the jury has retired to deliberate,
the court must either (1) with the consent of the defendant and the
people, discharge the alternate jurors or (2) direct the alternate
jurors not to discuss the case and must further direct that they be kept
separate and apart from the regular jurors.
2. In any prosecution in which the people seek a sentence of death,
the court shall not discharge the alternate jurors when the jury retires
to deliberate upon its verdict and the alternate jurors, in the
discretion of the court, may be continuously kept together under the
supervision of an appropriate public servant or servants until such time
as the jury returns its verdict. If the jury returns a verdict of guilty
to a charge for which the death penalty may be imposed, the alternate
jurors shall not be discharged and shall remain available for service
during any separate sentencing proceeding which may be conducted
pursuant to section 400.27.
Trial jury; discharge of juror; replacement by alternate juror.
1. If at any time after the trial jury has been sworn and before the
rendition of its verdict, a juror is unable to continue serving by
reason of illness or other incapacity, or for any other reason is
unavailable for continued service, or the court finds, from facts
unknown at the time of the selection of the jury, that a juror is
grossly unqualified to serve in the case or has engaged in misconduct of
a substantial nature, but not warranting the declaration of a mistrial,
the court must discharge such juror. If an alternate juror or jurors are
available for service, the court must order that the discharged juror be
replaced by the alternate juror whose name was first drawn and called,
provided, however, that if the trial jury has begun its deliberations,
the defendant must consent to such replacement. Such consent must be in
writing and must be signed by the defendant in person in open court in
the presence of the court. If the discharged juror was the foreperson,
the court shall designate as the new foreperson the juror whose name was
second drawn and called. If no alternate juror is available, the court
must declare a mistrial pursuant to subdivision three of section 280.10.
2. (a) In determining pursuant to this section whether a juror is
unable to continue serving by reason of illness or other incapacity, or
is for any other reason unavailable for continued service, the court
shall make a reasonably thorough inquiry concerning such illness,
incapacity or unavailability, and shall attempt to ascertain when such
juror will be appearing in court. If such juror fails to appear, or if
the court determines that there is no reasonable likelihood such juror
will be appearing, in court within two hours of the time set by the
court for the trial to resume, the court may presume such juror is
unavailable for continued service and may discharge such juror. Nothing
contained in this paragraph shall affect the court's discretion, under
this or any other provision of law, to discharge a juror who repeatedly
fails to appear in court in a timely fashion.
(b) The court shall afford the parties an opportunity to be heard
before discharging a juror. If the court discharges a juror pursuant to
this subdivision, it shall place on the record the facts and reasons for
its determination that such juror is ill, incapacitated or unavailable
for continued service.
(c) Nothing contained in this subdivision shall affect the
requirements of subdivision one of this section pertaining to the
discharge of a juror where the trial jury has begun its deliberations.
Trial jury; preliminary instructions by court.
After the jury has been sworn and before the people's opening address,
the court must instruct the jury generally concerning its basic
functions, duties and conduct. Such instructions must include, among
other matters, admonitions that the jurors may not converse among
themselves or with anyone else upon any subject connected with the
trial; that they may not read or listen to any accounts or discussions
of the case reported by newspapers or other news media; that they may
not visit or view the premises or place where the offense or offenses
charged were allegedly committed or any other premises or place involved
in the case; that prior to discharge, they may not request, accept,
agree to accept, or discuss with any person receiving or accepting, any
payment or benefit in consideration for supplying any information
concerning the trial; and that they must promptly report to the court
any incident within their knowledge involving an attempt by any person
improperly to influence any member of the jury.
Trial jury; when separation permitted.
During the period extending from the time the jurors are sworn to the
time they retire to deliberate upon their verdict, the court may in its
discretion either permit them to separate during recesses and
adjournments or direct that they be continuously kept together during
such periods under the supervision of an appropriate public servant or
servants. In the latter case, such public servant or servants may not
speak to or communicate with any juror concerning any subject connected
with the trial nor permit any other person to do so, and must return the
jury to the court room at the next designated trial session.
Trial jury; viewing of premises.
1. When the court is of the opinion that a viewing or observation by
the jury of the premises or place where an offense on trial was
allegedly committed, or of any other premises or place involved in the
case, will be helpful to the jury in determining any material factual
issue, it may in its discretion, at any time before the commencement of
the summations, order that the jury be conducted to such premises or
place for such purpose in accordance with the provisions of this
section.
2. In such case, the jury must be kept together throughout under the
supervision of an appropriate public servant or servants appointed by
the court, and the court itself must be present throughout. The
prosecutor, the defendant and counsel for the defendant may as a matter
of right be present throughout, but such right may be waived.
3. The purpose of such an inspection is solely to permit visual
observation by the jury of the premises or place in question, and
neither the court, the parties, counsel nor the jurors may engage in
discussion or argumentation concerning the significance or implications
of anything under observation or concerning any issue in the case.
Sentencing jury in capital cases.
During the period extending from when a jury returns a verdict of
guilty upon a count of an indictment charging murder in the first degree
as defined by section 125.27 of the penal law until a jury retires to
deliberate on the sentence pursuant to section 400.27, the court may in
its discretion either permit the jurors to separate during recesses and
adjournments or direct that they be continuously kept together during
such periods under the supervision of an appropriate public servant or
servants. In the latter case, such public servant or servants may not
speak to or communicate with any juror concerning any subject connected
with the sentencing proceeding nor permit any other person to do so, and
must return the jury to the court room at the next designated session.
Unless otherwise provided for in section 400.27, the provisions of
sections 270.35, 270.40 and 270.50 shall govern the sentencing
proceeding provided for in section 400.27.
ARTICLE 280 Jury Trial---motion For a Mistrial
Motion for mistrial.
At any time during the trial, the court must declare a mistrial and
order a new trial of the indictment under the following circumstances:
1. Upon motion of the defendant, when there occurs during the trial
an error or legal defect in the proceedings, or conduct inside or
outside the courtroom, which is prejudicial to the defendant and
deprives him of a fair trial. When such an error, defect or conduct
occurs during a joint trial of two or more defendants and a mistrial
motion is made by one or more but not by all, the court must declare a
mistrial only as to the defendant or defendants making or joining in the
motion, and the trial of the other defendant or defendants must proceed;
2. Upon motion of the people, when there occurs during the trial,
either inside or outside the courtroom, gross misconduct by the
defendant or some person acting on his behalf, or by a juror, resulting
in substantial and irreparable prejudice to the people's case. When
such misconduct occurs during a joint trial of two or more defendants,
and when the court is satisfied that it did not result in substantial
prejudice to the people's case as against a particular defendant and
that such defendant was in no way responsible for the misconduct, it may
not declare a mistrial with respect to such defendant but must proceed
with the trial as to him;
3. Upon motion of either party or upon the court's own motion, when
it is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with
law.
Motion for mistrial; status of indictment upon new trial.
Upon a new trial resulting from an order declaring a mistrial, the
indictment is deemed to contain all the counts which it contained at the
time the previous trial was commenced, regardless of whether any count
was thereafter dismissed by the court prior to the mistrial order.
ARTICLE 290 Jury Trial--trial Order of Dismissal
Trial order of dismissal.
1. At the conclusion of the people's case or at the conclusion of all
the evidence, the court may, except as provided in subdivision two, upon
motion of the defendant, (a) issue a "trial order of dismissal,"
dismissing any count of an indictment upon the ground that the trial
evidence is not legally sufficient to establish the offense charged
therein or any lesser included offense, or (b) reserve decision on the
motion until after the verdict has been rendered and accepted by the
court. Where the court has reserved decision and the jury thereafter
renders a verdict of guilty, the court shall proceed to determine the
motion upon such evidence as it would have been authorized to consider
upon the motion had the court not reserved decision. If the court
determines that such motion should have been granted upon the ground
specified in paragraph (a) herein, it shall enter an order both setting
aside the verdict and dismissing any count of the indictment upon such
ground. If the jury is discharged before rendition of a verdict the
court shall proceed to determine the motion as set forth in this
paragraph.
2. Despite the lack of legally sufficient trial evidence in support
of a count of an indictment as described in subdivision one, issuance of
a trial order of dismissal is not authorized and constitutes error when
the trial evidence would have been legally sufficient had the court not
erroneously excluded admissible evidence offered by the people.
3. When the court excludes trial evidence offered by the people under
such circumstances that the substance or content thereof does not appear
in the record, the people may, in anticipation of a possible subsequent
trial order of dismissal emanating from the allegedly improper exclusion
and erroneously issued in violation of subdivision two, and in
anticipation of a possible appeal therefrom pursuant to subdivision two
of section 450.20, place upon the record, out of the presence of the
jury, an "offer of proof" summarizing the substance or content of such
excluded evidence. Upon the subsequent issuance of a trial order of
dismissal and an appeal therefrom, such offer of proof constitutes a
part of the record on appeal and has the effect and significance
prescribed in subdivision two of section 450.40. In the absence of such
an order and an appeal therefrom, such offer of proof is not deemed a
part of the record and does not constitute such for purposes of an
ensuing appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction.
4. Upon issuing a trial order of dismissal which dismisses the entire
indictment, the court must immediately discharge the defendant from
custody if he is in custody of the sheriff, or, if he is at liberty on
bail, it must exonerate the bail.
ARTICLE 300 Jury Trial--court's Charge and Instructions to Jury
Court's charge; in general.
1. At the conclusion of the summations, the court must deliver a
charge to the jury.
2. In its charge, the court must state the fundamental legal
principles applicable to criminal cases in general. Such principles
include, but are not limited to, the presumption of the defendant's
innocence, the requirement that guilt be proved beyond a reasonable
doubt and that the jury may not, in determining the issue of guilt or
innocence, consider or speculate concerning matters relating to sentence
or punishment. Upon request of a defendant who did not testify in his
own behalf, but not otherwise, the court must state that the fact that
he did not testify is not a factor from which any inference unfavorable
to the defendant may be drawn. The court must also state the material
legal principles applicable to the particular case, and, so far as
practicable, explain the application of the law to the facts, but it
need not marshal or refer to the evidence to any greater extent than is
necessary for such explanation.
3. Where a defendant has raised the affirmative defense of lack of
criminal responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect, as
defined in section 40.15 of the penal law, the court must, without
elaboration, instruct the jury as follows: "A jury during its
deliberations must never consider or speculate concerning matters
relating to the consequences of its verdict. However, because of the
lack of common knowledge regarding the consequences of a verdict of not
responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, I charge you that if
this verdict is rendered by you there will be hearings as to the
defendant's present mental condition and, where appropriate, involuntary
commitment proceedings."
4. The court must specifically designate and submit, in accordance
with the provisions of sections 300.30 and 300.40, those counts and
offenses contained and charged in the indictment which the jury are to
consider. Such determination must be made, and the parties informed
thereof, prior to the summations. In its charge, the court must define
each offense so submitted and, except as otherwise expressly provided,
it must instruct the jury to render a verdict separately and
specifically upon each count submitted to it, and with respect to each
defendant if there be more than one, and must require that the verdict
upon each such count be one of the following:
(a) "Guilty" of the offense submitted, if there be but one; or
(b) Where appropriate, "guilty" of a specified one of two or more
offenses submitted under the same count in the alternative pursuant to
section 300.40; or
(c) "Not guilty"; or
(d) Where appropriate, "not responsible by reason of mental disease
or defect."
5. Both before and after the court's charge, the parties may submit
requests to charge, either orally or in writing, and the court must rule
promptly upon each request. A failure to rule upon a request is deemed
a denial thereof.
6. In a prosecution involving a charge of enterprise corruption, as
defined in article four hundred sixty of the penal law, the court must
specifically designate and separately submit for jury consideration
those criminal acts which are contained and charged in the indictment
and which are supported by legally sufficient trial evidence. Every
criminal act which is not so supported shall be dismissed and stricken
from the indictment. If legally sufficient trial evidence exists to
support a lesser included offense which is also a criminal act within
the meaning of subdivision one of section 460.10 of the penal law, such
lesser offense shall be substituted. Such determination must be made and
the parties informed thereof, prior to the summations. In its charge,
the court must define each criminal act so submitted and, as when it may
or must do so pursuant to sections 300.40 and 300.50 of this article,
any lesser included offense that is also a criminal act within the
meaning of subdivision one of section 460.10 of the penal law. It must
instruct the jury to render a verdict separately and specifically upon
each criminal act (and where necessary, any submitted lesser included
offense) submitted to it with respect to each defendant. It must further
explain to the jury that they may not consider a charge of enterprise
corruption against any defendant until they have separately and
unanimously agreed that the defendant has committed each of at least
three criminal acts alleged as part of the pattern of criminal activity,
including any submitted lesser included offenses.
Court's charge; submission of indictment to jury; definitions
of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "Submission of a count" of an indictment means submission of the
offense charged therein, or of a lesser included offense, or submission
in the alternative of both the offense charged and a lesser included
offense or offenses. When the court "submits a count," it must, at the
least, submit the offense charged therein if such is supported by
legally sufficient trial evidence, or if it is not, the greatest lesser
included offense which is supported by legally sufficient trial
evidence.
2. "Consecutive counts" means two or more counts of an indictment
upon which consecutive sentences may be imposed in case of conviction
thereon.
3. "Concurrent counts" means two or more counts of an indictment upon
which concurrent sentences only may be imposed in case of conviction
thereon.
4. "Inclusory concurrent counts." Concurrent counts are "inclusory"
when the offense charged in one is greater than any of those charged in
the others and when the latter are all lesser offenses included within
the greater. All other kinds of concurrent counts are "non-inclusory."
5. "Inconsistent counts." Two counts are "inconsistent" when guilt
of the offense charged in one necessarily negates guilt of the offense
charged in the other.
Court's charge; submission of indictment to jury; counts to
be submitted.
The court may submit to the jury only those counts of an indictment
remaining therein at the time of its charge which are supported by
legally sufficient trial evidence, and every count not so supported
should be dismissed by a trial order of dismissal. The court's
determination as to which of the sufficient counts are to be submitted
must be in accordance with the following rules:
1. If the indictment contains but one count, the court must submit
such count.
2. If a multiple count indictment contains consecutive counts only,
the court must submit every count thereof.
3. If a multiple count indictment contains concurrent counts of murder
in the first degree, the court must submit every such count. In any
other case, if a multiple count indictment contains concurrent counts
only, the court must submit at least one such count, and may submit more
than one as follows:
(a) With respect to non-inclusory concurrent counts, the court may in
its discretion submit one or more or all thereof;
(b) With respect to inclusory concurrent counts, the court must
submit the greatest or inclusive count and may or must, under
circumstances prescribed in section 300.50, also submit, but in the
alternative only, one or more of the lesser included counts. A verdict
of guilty upon the greatest count submitted is deemed a dismissal of
every lesser count submitted, but not an acquittal thereon. A verdict
of guilty upon a lesser count is deemed an acquittal upon every greater
count submitted.
4. If a multiple count indictment contains two or more groups of
counts, with the counts within each group being concurrent as to each
other but consecutive as to those of the other group or groups, the
court must submit at least one count of each group, in the manner
prescribed in subdivision three. If an indictment contains one or more
of such groups of concurrent counts, and also one or more other counts
each of which is consecutive as to every other count of the indictment,
the court must submit each individual consecutive count and at least one
count of each group of concurrent counts.
5. If an indictment contains two inconsistent counts, the court must
submit at least one thereof. If a verdict of guilty upon either would
be supported by legally sufficient trial evidence, the court may submit
both counts in the alternative and authorize the jury to convict upon
one or the other depending upon its findings of fact. In such case, the
court must direct the jury that if it renders a verdict of guilty upon
one such count it must render a verdict of not guilty upon the other.
If the court is satisfied that a conviction upon one such count, though
supported by legally sufficient trial evidence, would be against the
weight of the evidence while a conviction upon the other would not, it
may in its discretion submit the latter count only.
6. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the court is
not required to submit any particular count to the jury when:
(a) The people consent that it not be submitted; except that nothing
contained in this paragraph limits the right accorded a defendant by
section 300.50 to the submission, in certain situations, of counts
charging lesser included offenses; or
(b) The number of counts or the complexity of the indictment requires
selectivity of counts by the court in order to avoid placing an unduly
heavy burden upon the jury in its consideration of the case. In such
case, the court may submit to the jury a portion of the counts which are
representative of the people's case.
7. Every count not submitted to the jury is deemed to have been
dismissed by the court. Where the court, over objection of the people,
refuses to submit a count which is consecutive as to every count
actually submitted, such count is deemed to have been dismissed by a
trial order of dismissal even though no such order was expressly made by
the court.
Court's charge; submission of lesser included offenses.
1. In submitting a count of an indictment to the jury, the court in
its discretion may, in addition to submitting the greatest offense which
it is required to submit, submit in the alternative any lesser included
offense if there is a reasonable view of the evidence which would
support a finding that the defendant committed such lesser offense but
did not commit the greater. If there is no reasonable view of the
evidence which would support such a finding, the court may not submit
such lesser offense. Any error respecting such submission, however, is
waived by the defendant unless he objects thereto before the jury
retires to deliberate.
2. If the court is authorized by subdivision one to submit a lesser
included offense and is requested by either party to do so, it must do
so. In the absence of such a request, the court's failure to submit such
offense does not constitute error.
3. The principles prescribed in subdivisions one and two apply equally
where the lesser included offense is specifically charged in another
count of the indictment.
4. Whenever the court submits two or more offenses in the alternative
pursuant to this section, it must instruct the jury that it may render a
verdict of guilty with respect to any one of such offenses, depending
upon its findings of fact, but that it may not render a verdict of
guilty with respect to more than one. A verdict of guilty of any such
offense is not deemed an acquittal of any lesser offense submitted, but
is deemed an acquittal of every greater offense submitted.
5. Where the indictment charges a crime committed by the defendant
while he was under the age of sixteen but a lesser included offense
would be one for which the defendant is not criminally responsible by
reason of infancy, such lessor included offense may nevertheless be
submitted to the jury in the same manner as an offense for which the
defendant would be criminally responsible notwithstanding the fact that
a verdict of guilty would not result in a criminal conviction.
6. For purposes of this section, the offenses of rape in the third
degree as defined in the former subdivision three or subdivisions seven,
eight and nine of section 130.25 of the penal law and a crime formerly
defined in subdivision three of section 130.40 of the penal law, are not
lesser included offenses of rape in the first degree, a crime formerly
defined in section 130.50 of the penal law, or any other offense.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such offense may be submitted as a
lesser included offense of the applicable first degree offense when (i)
there is a reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding
that the defendant committed such lesser offense but did not commit the
greater offense, and (ii) both parties consent to its submission.
ARTICLE 310 Jury Trial--deliberation and Verdict of Jury
Jury deliberation; requirement of; where conducted.
1. Following the court's charge, except as otherwise provided by
subdivision two of this section, the jury must retire to deliberate upon
its verdict in a place outside the courtroom. It must be provided with
suitable accommodations therefor and must, except as otherwise provided
in subdivision two of this section, be continuously kept together under
the supervision of a court officer or court officers. In the event such
court officer or court officers are not available, the jury shall be
under the supervision of an appropriate public servant or public
servants. Except when so authorized by the court or when performing
administerial duties with respect to the jurors, such court officers or
public servants, as the case may be, may not speak to or communicate
with them or permit any other person to do so.
2. At any time after the jury has been charged or commenced its
deliberations, and after notice to the parties and affording such
parties an opportunity to be heard on the record outside of the presence
of the jury, the court may declare the deliberations to be in recess and
may thereupon direct the jury to suspend its deliberations and to
separate for a reasonable period of time to be specified by the court,
not lasting beyond close of business on the second day following such
recess or, for good cause shown, beyond close of business on the third
day following recess of jury deliberations unless the defendant consents
to a longer period of suspension and separation. For the purposes of
this section, where a day referred to in this subdivision falls on a
Saturday, Sunday or holiday, such day shall mean the next day thereafter
during which the courthouse is open for the conduct of trials. Before
each recess, the court must admonish the jury as provided in section
270.40 of this title and direct it not to resume its deliberations until
all twelve jurors have reassembled in the designated place at the
termination of the declared recess.
Jury deliberation; use of exhibits and other material.
Upon retiring to deliberate, the jurors may take with them:
1. Any exhibits received in evidence at the trial which the court,
after according the parties an opportunity to be heard upon the matter,
in its discretion permits them to take;
2. A written list prepared by the court containing the offenses
submitted to the jury by the court in its charge and the possible
verdicts thereon. Whenever the court submits two or more counts charging
offenses set forth in the same article of the law, the court may set
forth the dates, names of complainants or specific statutory language,
without defining the terms, by which the counts may be distinguished;
provided, however, that the court shall instruct the jury in its charge
that the sole purpose of the notations is to distinguish between the
counts; and
3. A written list prepared by the court containing the names of every
witness whose testimony has been presented during the trial, if the jury
requests such a list and the court, in its discretion, determines that
such a list will assist the jury.
Jury deliberation; request for information.
At any time during its deliberation, the jury may request the court
for further instruction or information with respect to the law, with
respect to the content or substance of any trial evidence, or with
respect to any other matter pertinent to the jury's consideration of the
case. Upon such a request, the court must direct that the jury be
returned to the courtroom and, after notice to both the people and
counsel for the defendant, and in the presence of the defendant, must
give such requested information or instruction as the court deems
proper. With the consent of the parties and upon the request of the jury
for further instruction with respect to a statute, the court may also
give to the jury copies of the text of any statute which, in its
discretion, the court deems proper.
Verdict; rendition thereof.
1. The verdict must be rendered and announced by the foreperson of the
jury in the courtroom in the presence of the court, a prosecutor, the
defendant's counsel and the defendant; provided, however, that where the
foreperson refuses or is unable to render and announce the verdict, the
court may designate another member of the jury to do so.
2. Before rendering and announcing the verdict, the foreperson of the
jury, or such other member of the jury as may be designated by the court
pursuant to subdivision one, must be asked whether the jury has agreed
upon a verdict and must answer in the affirmative.
Verdict; form; reconsideration of defective verdict.
1. The form of the verdict must be in accordance with the court's
instructions, as prescribed in article three hundred.
2. If the jury renders a verdict which in form is not in accordance
with the court's instructions or which is otherwise legally defective,
the court must explain the defect or error and must direct the jury to
reconsider such verdict, to resume its deliberation for such purpose,
and to render a proper verdict. If the jury persists in rendering a
defective or improper verdict, the court may in its discretion either
order that the verdict in its entirety as to any defendant be recorded
as an acquittal, or discharge the jury and authorize the people to retry
the indictment or a specified count or counts thereof as to such
defendant; provided that if it is clear that the jury intended to find a
defendant not guilty upon any particular count, the court must order
that the verdict be recorded as an acquittal of such defendant upon such
count.
3. If the court accepts a verdict which is defective or incomplete by
reason of the jury's failure to render a verdict upon every count upon
which it was instructed to do so, such verdict is deemed to constitute
an acquittal upon every such count improperly ignored in the verdict.
4. In a prosecution involving a charge of enterprise corruption in
violation of article four hundred sixty of the penal law, the jury must
separately and specifically render a special verdict with regard to each
criminal act and any lesser included offense submitted for its
consideration as a part of a pattern of criminal activity in addition to
its verdict on the charge of enterprise corruption. In the absence of a
unanimous special verdict of guilty with regard to each of at least
three criminal acts and/or lesser included offenses submitted for its
consideration and legally sufficient to constitute a person's
participation in a pattern of criminal activity within the meaning of
subdivision four of section 460.10 of the penal law, the court must
order that the verdict on the count charging enterprise corruption be
recorded as an acquittal.
Discharge of jury before rendition of verdict and effect
thereof.
1. A deliberating jury may be discharged by the court without having
rendered a verdict only when:
(a) The jury has deliberated for an extensive period of time without
agreeing upon a verdict with respect to any of the charges submitted and
the court is satisfied that any such agreement is unlikely within a
reasonable time; or
(b) The court, the defendant and the people all consent to such
discharge; or
(c) A mistrial is declared pursuant to section 280.10.
2. When the jury is so discharged, the defendant or defendants may be
retried upon the indictment. Upon such retrial, the indictment is
deemed to contain all counts which it contained, except those which were
dismissed or were deemed to have resulted in an acquittal pursuant to
subdivision one of section 290.10.
Rendition of partial verdict and effect thereof.
1. If a deliberating jury declares that it has reached a verdict with
respect to one or more but not all of the offenses submitted to it, or
with respect to one or more but not all of the defendants, the court
must proceed as follows:
(a) If the possibility of ultimate agreement with respect to the
other submitted offenses or defendants is so small and the circumstances
are such that if they were the only matters under consideration the
court would be authorized to discharge the jury pursuant to paragraph
(a) of subdivision one of section 310.60, the court must terminate the
deliberation and order the jury to render a partial verdict with respect
to those offenses and defendants upon which or with respect to whom it
has reached a verdict;
(b) If the court is satisfied that there is a reasonable possibility
of ultimate agreement upon any of the unresolved offenses with respect
to any defendant, it may either:
(i) Order the jury to render its verdict with respect to those
offenses and defendants upon which or with respect to whom it has
reached agreement and resume its deliberation upon the remainder; or
(ii) Refuse to accept a partial verdict at the time and order the
jury to resume its deliberation upon the entire case.
2. Following the rendition of a partial verdict pursuant to
subdivision one, a defendant may be retried for any submitted offense
upon which the jury was unable to agree unless:
(a) A verdict of conviction thereon would have been inconsistent with
a verdict, of either conviction or acquittal, actually rendered with
respect to some other offense, or
(b) The submitted offense which was the subject of the disagreement,
and some other submitted offense of higher or equal grade which was the
subject of a verdict of conviction, were so related that consecutive
sentences thereon could not have been imposed upon a defendant convicted
of both such offenses.
3. As used in this section, a "submitted offense" means any offense
submitted by the court to the jury, whether it be one which was
expressly charged in a count of the indictment or a lesser included
offense thereof submitted pursuant to section 300.50.
Recording and checking of verdict and polling of jury.
After a verdict has been rendered, it must be recorded on the minutes
and read to the jury, and the jurors must be collectively asked whether
such is their verdict. Even though no juror makes any declaration in the
negative, the jury must, if either party makes such an application, be
polled and each juror separately asked whether the verdict announced by
the foreman is in all respects his verdict. If upon either the
collective or the separate inquiry any juror answers in the negative,
the court must refuse to accept the verdict and must direct the jury to
resume its deliberation. If no disagreement is expressed, the jury must
be discharged from the case, except as otherwise provided in section
Verdict of guilty where defendant not criminally responsible.
1. Where a verdict of guilty is rendered with respect to a crime, but
the defendant is not criminally responsible for such crime by reason of
infancy, the court shall proceed as provided in this section.
2. If a verdict of guilty also is rendered with respect to a crime
for which the defendant is criminally responsible, or if the defendant
is awaiting sentence upon another criminal conviction or is under a
sentence of imprisonment on another criminal conviction, the verdict
rendered with respect to a crime for which he is not criminally
responsible must be set aside and shall be deemed a nullity.
3. In any case where the verdict is not set aside pursuant to
subdivision two of this section, the court must order that the verdict
be deemed vacated and replaced by a juvenile delinquency fact
determination. Upon so ordering, the court must direct that the action
be removed to the family court in accordance with the provisions of
article seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter.
ARTICLE 320 Waiver of Jury Trial and Conduct of Non-jury Trial
Non-jury trial; when authorized.
1. Except where the indictment charges the crime of murder in the
first degree, the defendant, subject to the provisions of subdivision
two, may at any time before trial waive a jury trial and consent to a
trial without a jury in the superior court in which the indictment is
pending.
2. Such waiver must be in writing and must be signed by the defendant
in person in open court in the presence of the court, and with the
approval of the court. The court must approve the execution and
submission of such waiver unless it determines that it is tendered as a
stratagem to procure an otherwise impermissible procedural advantage or
that the defendant is not fully aware of the consequences of the choice
he is making. If the court disapproves the waiver, it must state upon
the record its reasons for such disapproval.
Non-jury trial; nature and conduct thereof.
1. A non-jury trial of an indictment must be conducted by one judge
of the superior court in which the indictment is pending.
2. The court, in addition to determining all questions of law, is the
execlusive trier of all issues of fact and must render a verdict.
3. The order of the trial must be as follows:
(a) The court must permit the parties to deliver opening addresses in
the order provided for a trial by jury pursuant to section 260.30.
(b) The order in which evidence must or may be offered by the
respective parties is the same as that applicable to a jury trial of an
indictment as prescribed in subdivisions five, six and seven of section
260.30.
(c) The court must permit the parties to deliver summations in the
order provided for a trial by jury pursuant to section 260.30.
(d) The court must then consider the case and render a verdict.
4. The provisions governing motion practice and general procedure
with respect to a jury trial are, wherever appropriate, applicable to a
non-jury trial.
5. Before considering a multiple count indictment for the purpose of
rendering a verdict thereon, and before the summations if there be any,
the court must designate and state upon the record the counts upon which
it will render a verdict and the particular defendant or defendants, if
there be more than one, with respect to whom it will render a verdict
upon any particular count. In determining what counts, offenses and
defendants must be considered by it and covered by its verdict, and the
form of the verdict in general, the court must be governed, so far as
appropriate and practicable, by the provisions of article three hundred
governing the court's submission of counts and offenses to a jury upon a
jury trial.
ARTICLE 330 Proceedings From Verdict to Sentence
Disposition of defendant after verdict of acquittal.
1. Upon a verdict of complete acquittal, the court must immediately
discharge the defendant if he is in the custody of the sheriff, or, if
he is at liberty on bail, it must exonerate the bail.
2. Upon a verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect, the provisions of section 330.20 of this chapter shall govern
all subsequent proceedings against the defendant.
Procedure following verdict or plea of not responsible by
reason of mental disease or defect.
1. Definition of terms. As used in this section, the following terms
shall have the following meanings:
(a) "Commissioner" means the state commissioner of mental health or
the state commissioner of the office for people with developmental
disabilities.
(b) "Secure facility" means a facility within the state office of
mental health or the state office for people with developmental
disabilities which is staffed with personnel adequately trained in
security methods and is so equipped as to minimize the risk or danger of
escapes, and which has been so specifically designated by the
commissioner.
(c) "Dangerous mental disorder" means: (i) that a defendant currently
suffers from a "mental illness" as that term is defined in subdivision
twenty of section 1.03 of the mental hygiene law, and (ii) that because
of such condition he currently constitutes a physical danger to himself
or others.
(d) "Mentally ill" means that a defendant currently suffers from a
mental illness for which care and treatment as a patient, in the
in-patient services of a psychiatric center under the jurisdiction of
the state office of mental health, is essential to such defendant's
welfare and that his or her judgment is so impaired that he is unable to
understand the need for such care and treatment; and, where a defendant
has a developmental disability, the term "mentally ill" shall also mean,
for purposes of this section, that the defendant is in need of care and
treatment as a resident in the in-patient services of a developmental
center or other residential facility for individuals with developmental
disabilities under the jurisdiction of the state office for people with
developmental disabilities.
(e) "Examination order" means an order directed to the commissioner
requiring that a defendant submit to a psychiatric examination to
determine whether the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder, or if
he does not have dangerous mental disorder, whether he is mentally ill.
(f) "Commitment order" or "recommitment order" means an order
committing a defendant to the custody of the commissioner for
confinement in a secure facility for care and treatment for six months
from the date of the order.
(g) "First retention order" means an order which is effective at the
expiration of the period prescribed in a commitment order for a
recommitment order, authorizing continued custody of a defendant by the
commissioner for a period not to exceed one year.
(h) "Second retention order" means an order which is effective at the
expiration of the period prescribed in a first retention order,
authorizing continued custody of a defendant by the commissioner for a
period not to exceed two years.
(i) "Subsequent retention order" means an order which is effective at
the expiration of the period prescribed in a second retention order or a
prior subsequent retention order authorizing continued custody of a
defendant by the commissioner for a period not to exceed two years.
(j) "Retention order" means a first retention order, a second
retention order or a subsequent retention order.
(k) "Furlough order" means an order directing the commissioner to
allow a defendant in confinement pursuant to a commitment order,
recommitment order or retention order to temporarily leave the facility
for a period not exceeding fourteen days, either with or without the
constant supervision of one or more employees of the facility.
(l) "Transfer order" means an order directing the commissioner to
transfer a defendant from a secure facility to a non-secure facility
under the jurisdiction of the commissioner or to any non-secure facility
designated by the commissioner.
(m) "Release order" means an order directing the commissioner to
terminate a defendant's in-patient status without terminating the
commissioner's responsibility for the defendant.
(n) "Discharge order" means an order terminating an order of
conditions or unconditionally discharging a defendant from supervision
under the provisions of this section.
(o) "Order of conditions" means an order directing a defendant to
comply with this prescribed treatment plan, or any other condition which
the court determines to be reasonably necessary or appropriate, and, in
addition, where a defendant is in custody of the commissioner, not to
leave the facility without authorization. In addition to such
conditions, when determined to be reasonably necessary or appropriate,
an order of conditions may be accompanied by a special order of
conditions set forth in a separate document requiring that the
defendant: (i) stay away from the home, school, business or place of
employment of the victim or victims, or of any witness designated by the
court, of such offense; or (ii) refrain from harassing, intimidating,
threatening or otherwise interfering with the victim or victims of the
offense and such members of the family or household of such victim or
victims as shall be specifically named by the court in such special
order. An order of conditions or special order of conditions shall be
valid for five years from the date of its issuance, except that, for
good cause shown, the court may extend the period for an additional five
years.
(p) "District attorney" means the office which prosecuted the criminal
action resulting in the verdict or plea of not responsible by reason of
mental disease or defect.
(q) "Qualified psychiatrist" means a physician who (i) is a diplomate
of the American board of psychiatry and neurology or is eligible to be
certified by that board; or (ii) is certified by the American
osteopathic board of neurology and psychiatry or is eligible to be
certified by that board.
(r) "Licensed psychologist" means a person who is registered as a
psychologist under article one hundred fifty-three of the education law.
(s) "Psychiatric examiner" means a qualified psychiatrist or a
licensed psychologist who has been designated by the commissioner to
examine a defendant pursuant to this section, and such designee need not
be an employee of the department of mental hygiene.
2. Examination order; psychiatric examiners. Upon entry of a verdict
of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, or upon the
acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or
defect, the court must immediately issue an examination order. Upon
receipt of such order, the commissioner must designate two qualified
psychiatric examiners to conduct the examination to examine the
defendant. In conducting their examination, the psychiatric examiners
may employ any method which is accepted by the medical profession for
the examination of persons alleged to be suffering from a dangerous
mental disorder or to be mentally ill or having a developmental
disability. The court may authorize a psychiatrist or psychologist
retained by a defendant to be present at such examination. The clerk of
the court must promptly forward a copy of the examination order to the
mental hygiene legal service and such service may thereafter participate
in all subsequent proceedings under this section.
In all subsequent proceedings under this section, prior to the
issuance of a special order of conditions, the court shall consider
whether any order of protection had been issued prior to a verdict of
not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect in the case, or
prior to the acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental
disease or defect in the case.
2-a. Firearm, rifle or shotgun surrender order. Upon entry of a
verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, or
upon the acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental
disease or defect, or upon a finding that the defendant is an
incapacitated person pursuant to article seven hundred thirty of this
chapter, the court shall revoke the defendant's firearm license, if any,
inquire of the defendant as to the existence and location of any
firearm, rifle or shotgun owned or possessed by such defendant and
direct the surrender of such firearm, rifle or shotgun pursuant to
subparagraph (f) of paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20 and
subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law.
3. Examination order; place of examination. Upon issuing an
examination order, the court must, except as otherwise provided in this
subdivision, direct that the defendant be committed to a secure facility
designated by the commissioner as the place for such psychiatric
examination. The sheriff must hold the defendant in custody pending such
designation by the commissioner, and when notified of the designation,
the sheriff must promptly deliver the defendant to such secure facility.
When the defendant is not in custody at the time of such verdict or
plea, because he was previously released on bail or on his own
recognizance, the court, in its discretion, may direct that such
examination be conducted on an out-patient basis, and at such time and
place as the commissioner shall designate. If, however, the commissioner
informs the court that confinement of the defendant is necessary for an
effective examination, the court must direct that the defendant be
confined in a facility designated by the commissioner until the
examination is completed.
4. Examination order, duration. Confinement in a secure facility
pursuant to an examination order shall be for a period not exceeding
thirty days, except that, upon application of the commissioner, the
court may authorize confinement for an additional period not exceeding
thirty days when a longer period is necessary to complete the
examination. If the initial hearing required by subdivision six of this
section has not commenced prior to the termination of such examination
period, the commissioner shall retain custody of the defendant in such
secure facility until custody is transferred to the sheriff in the
manner prescribed in subdivision six of this section. During the period
of such confinement, the physician in charge of the facility may
administer or cause to be administered to the defendant such emergency
psychiatric, medical or other therapeutic treatment as in his judgment
should be administered. If the court has directed that the examination
be conducted on an out-patient basis, the examination shall be completed
within thirty days after the defendant has first reported to the place
designated by the commissioner, except that, upon application of the
commissioner, the court may extend such period for a reasonable time if
a longer period is necessary to complete the examination.
5. Examination order; reports. After he has completed his examination
of the defendant, each psychiatric examiner must promptly prepare a
report of his findings and evaluation concerning the defendant's mental
condition, and submit such report to the commissioner. If the
psychiatric examiners differ in their opinion as to whether the
defendant is mentally ill or is suffering from a dangerous mental
disorder, the commissioner must designate another psychiatric examiner
to examine the defendant. Upon receipt of the examination reports, the
commissioner must submit them to the court that issued the examination
order. If the court is not satisfied with the findings of these
psychiatric examiners, the court may designate one or more additional
psychiatric examiners pursuant to subdivision fifteen of this section.
The court must furnish a copy of the reports to the district attorney,
counsel for the defendant and the mental hygiene legal service.
6. Initial hearing; commitment order. After the examination reports
are submitted, the court must, within ten days of the receipt of such
reports, conduct an initial hearing to determine the defendant's present
mental condition. If the defendant is in the custody of the commissioner
pursuant to an examination order, the court must direct the sheriff to
obtain custody of the defendant from the commissioner and to confine the
defendant pending further order of the court, except that the court may
direct the sheriff to confine the defendant in an institution located
near the place where the court sits if that institution has been
designated by the commissioner as suitable for the temporary and secure
detention of mentally disabled persons. At such initial hearing, the
district attorney must establish to the satisfaction of the court that
the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder or is mentally ill. If the
court finds that the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder, it must
issue a commitment order. If the court finds that the defendant does not
have a dangerous mental disorder but is mentally ill, the provisions of
subdivision seven of this section shall apply.
7. Initial hearing civil commitment and order of conditions. If, at
the conclusion of the initial hearing conducted pursuant to subdivision
six of this section, the court finds that the defendant is mentally ill
but does not have a dangerous mental disorder, the provisions of
articles nine or fifteen of the mental hygiene law shall apply at that
stage of the proceedings and at all subsequent proceedings. Having found
that the defendant is mentally ill, the court must issue an order of
conditions and an order committing the defendant to the custody of the
commissioner. The latter order shall be deemed an order made pursuant to
the mental hygiene law and not pursuant to this section, and further
retention, conditional release or discharge of such defendant shall be
in accordance with the provisions of the mental hygiene law. If, at the
conclusion of the initial hearing, the court finds that the defendant
does not have a dangerous mental disorder and is not mentally ill, the
court must discharge the defendant either unconditionally or subject to
an order of conditions.
7-a. Whenever the court issues a special order of conditions pursuant
to this section, the commissioner shall make reasonable efforts to
notify the victim or victims or the designated witness or witnesses that
a special order of conditions containing such provisions has been
issued, unless such victim or witness has requested that such notice
should not be provided.
8. First retention order. When a defendant is in the custody of the
commissioner pursuant to a commitment order, the commissioner must, at
least thirty days prior to the expiration of the period prescribed in
the order, apply to the court that issued the order, or to a superior
court in the county where the secure facility is located, for a first
retention order or a release order. The commissioner must give written
notice of the application to the district attorney, the defendant,
counsel for the defendant, and the mental hygiene legal service. Upon
receipt of such application, the court may, on its own motion, conduct a
hearing to determine whether the defendant has a dangerous mental
disorder, and it must conduct such hearing if a demand therefor is made
by the district attorney, the defendant, counsel for the defendant, or
the mental hygiene legal service within ten days from the date that
notice of the application was given to them. If such a hearing is held
on an application for retention, the commissioner must establish to the
satisfaction of the court that the defendant has a dangerous mental
disorder or is mentally ill. The district attorney shall be entitled to
appear and present evidence at such hearing. If such a hearing is held
on an application for release, the district attorney must establish to
the satisfaction of the court that the defendant has a dangerous mental
disorder or is mentally ill. If the court finds that the defendant has a
dangerous mental disorder it must issue a first retention order. If the
court finds that the defendant is mentally ill but does not have a
dangerous mental disorder, it must issue a first retention order and,
pursuant to subdivision eleven of this section, a transfer order and an
order of conditions. If the court finds that the defendant does not have
a dangerous mental disorder and is not mentally ill, it must issue a
release order and an order of conditions pursuant to subdivision twelve
of this section.
9. Second and subsequent retention orders. When a defendant is in the
custody of the commissioner pursuant to a first retention order, the
commissioner must, at least thirty days prior to the expiration of the
period prescribed in the order, apply to the court that issued the
order, or to a superior court in the county where the facility is
located, for a second retention order or a release order. The
commissioner must give written notice of the application to the district
attorney, the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the mental
hygiene legal service. Upon receipt of such application, the court may,
on its own motion, conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant
has a dangerous mental disorder, and it must conduct such hearing if a
demand therefor is made by the district attorney, the defendant, counsel
for the defendant, or the mental hygiene legal service within ten days
from the date that notice of the application was given to them. If such
a hearing is held on an application for retention, the commissioner must
establish to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant has a
dangerous mental disorder or is mentally ill. The district attorney
shall be entitled to appear and present evidence at such hearing. If
such a hearing is held on an application for release, the district
attorney must establish to the satisfaction of the court that the
defendant has a dangerous mental disorder or is mentally ill. If the
court finds that the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder it must
issue a second retention order. If the court finds that the defendant is
mentally ill but does not have a dangerous mental disorder, it must
issue a second retention order and, pursuant to subdivision eleven of
this section, a transfer order and an order of conditions. If the court
finds that the defendant does not have a dangerous mental disorder and
is not mentally ill, it must issue a release order and an order of
conditions pursuant to subdivision twelve of this section. When a
defendant is in the custody of the commissioner prior to the expiration
of the period prescribed in a second retention order, the procedures set
forth in this subdivision for the issuance of a second retention order
shall govern the application for and the issuance of any subsequent
retention order.
10. Furlough order. The commissioner may apply for a furlough order,
pursuant to this subdivision, when a defendant is in his custody
pursuant to a commitment order, recommitment order, or retention order
and the commissioner is of the view that, consistent with the public
safety and welfare of the community and the defendant, the clinical
condition of the defendant warrants a granting of the privileges
authorized by a furlough order. The application for a furlough order may
be made to the court that issued the commitment order, or to a superior
court in the county where the secure facility is located. The
commissioner must give ten days written notice to the district attorney,
the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the mental hygiene legal
service. Upon receipt of such application, the court may, on its own
motion, conduct a hearing to determine whether the application should be
granted, and must conduct such hearing if a demand therefor is made by
the district attorney. If the court finds that the issuance of a
furlough order is consistent with the public safety and welfare of the
community and the defendant, and that the clinical condition of the
defendant warrants a granting of the privileges authorized by a furlough
order, the court must grant the application and issue a furlough order
containing any terms and conditions that the court deems necessary or
appropriate. If the defendant fails to return to the secure facility at
the time specified in the furlough order, then, for purposes of
subdivision nineteen of this section, he shall be deemed to have
escaped.
11. Transfer order and order of conditions. The commissioner may apply
for a transfer order, pursuant to this subdivision, when a defendant is
in his custody pursuant to a retention order or a recommitment order,
and the commissioner is of the view that the defendant does not have a
dangerous mental disorder or that, consistent with the public safety and
welfare of the community and the defendant, the clinical condition of
the defendant warrants his transfer from a secure facility to a
non-secure facility under the jurisdiction of the commissioner or to any
non-secure facility designated by the commissioner. The application for
a transfer order may be made to the court that issued the order under
which the defendant is then in custody, or to a superior court in the
county where the secure facility is located. The commissioner must give
ten days written notice to the district attorney, the defendant, counsel
for the defendant, and the mental hygiene legal service. Upon receipt of
such application, the court may, on its own motion, conduct a hearing to
determine whether the application should be granted, and must conduct
such hearing if the demand therefor is made by the district attorney. At
such hearing, the district attorney must establish to the satisfaction
of the court that the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder or that
the issuance of a transfer order is inconsistent with the public safety
and welfare of the community. The court must grant the application and
issue a transfer order if the court finds that the defendant does not
have a dangerous mental disorder, or if the court finds that the
issuance of a transfer order is consistent with the public safety and
welfare of the community and the defendant and that the clinical
condition of the defendant, warrants his transfer from a secure facility
to a non-secure facility. A court must also issue a transfer order when,
in connection with an application for a first retention order pursuant
to subdivision eight of this section or a second or subsequent retention
order pursuant to subdivision nine of this section, it finds that a
defendant is mentally ill but does not have a dangerous mental disorder.
Whenever a court issues a transfer order it must also issue an order of
conditions.
12. Release order and order of conditions. The commissioner may apply
for a release order, pursuant to this subdivision, when a defendant is
in his custody pursuant to a retention order or recommitment order, and
the commissioner is of the view that the defendant no longer has a
dangerous mental disorder and is no longer mentally ill. The application
for a release order may be made to the court that issued the order under
which the defendant is then in custody, or to a superior court in the
county where the facility is located. The application must contain a
description of the defendant's current mental condition, the past course
of treatment, a history of the defendant's conduct subsequent to his
commitment, a written service plan for continued treatment which shall
include the information specified in subdivision (g) of section 29.15 of
the mental hygiene law, and a detailed statement of the extent to which
supervision of the defendant after release is proposed. The commissioner
must give ten days written notice to the district attorney, the
defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the mental hygiene legal
service. Upon receipt of such application, the court must promptly
conduct a hearing to determine the defendant's present mental condition.
At such hearing, the district attorney must establish to the
satisfaction of the court that the defendant has a dangerous mental
disorder or is mentally ill. If the court finds that the defendant has a
dangerous mental disorder, it must deny the application for a release
order. If the court finds that the defendant does not have a dangerous
mental disorder but is mentally ill, it must issue a transfer order
pursuant to subdivision eleven of this section if the defendant is then
confined in a secure facility. If the court finds that the defendant
does not have a dangerous mental disorder and is not mentally ill, it
must grant the application and issue a release order. A court must also
issue a release order when, in connection with an application for a
first retention order pursuant to subdivision eight of this section or a
second or subsequent retention order pursuant to subdivision nine of
this section, it finds that the defendant does not have a dangerous
mental disorder and is not mentally ill. Whenever a court issues a
release order it must also issue an order of conditions. If the court
has previously issued a transfer order and an order of conditions, it
must issue a new order of conditions upon issuing a release order. The
order of conditions issued in conjunction with a release order shall
incorporate a written service plan prepared by a psychiatrist familiar
with the defendant's case history and approved by the court, and shall
contain any conditions that the court determines to be reasonably
necessary or appropriate. It shall be the responsibility of the
commissioner to determine that such defendant is receiving the services
specified in the written service plan and is complying with any
conditions specified in such plan and the order of conditions.
13. Discharge order. The commissioner may apply for a discharge order,
pursuant to this subdivision, when a defendant has been continuously on
an out-patient status for three years or more pursuant to a release
order, and the commissioner is of the view that the defendant no longer
has a dangerous mental disorder and is no longer mentally ill and that
the issuance of a discharge order is consistent with the public safety
and welfare of the community and the defendant. The application for a
discharge order may be made to the court that issued the release order,
or to a superior court in the county where the defendant is then
residing. The commissioner must give ten days written notice to the
district attorney, the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the
mental hygiene legal service. Upon receipt of such application, the
court may, on its own motion, conduct a hearing to determine whether the
application should be granted, and must conduct such hearing if a demand
therefor is made by the district attorney. The court must grant the
application and issue a discharge order if the court finds that the
defendant has been continuously on an out-patient status for three years
or more, that he does not have a dangerous mental disorder and is not
mentally ill, and that the issuance of the discharge order is consistent
with the public safety and welfare of the community and the defendant.
14. Recommitment order. At any time during the period covered by an
order of conditions an application may be made by the commissioner or
the district attorney to the court that issued such order, or to a
superior court in the county where the defendant is then residing, for a
recommitment order when the applicant is of the view that the defendant
has a dangerous mental disorder. The applicant must give written notice
of the application to the defendant, counsel for the defendant, and the
mental hygiene legal service, and if the applicant is the commissioner
he must give such notice to the district attorney or if the applicant is
the district attorney he must give such notice to the commissioner. Upon
receipt of such application the court must order the defendant to appear
before it for a hearing to determine if the defendant has a dangerous
mental disorder. Such order may be in the form of a written notice,
specifying the time and place of appearance, served personally upon the
defendant, or mailed to his last known address, as the court may direct.
If the defendant fails to appear in court as directed, the court may
issue a warrant to an appropriate peace officer directing him to take
the defendant into custody and bring him before the court. In such
circumstance, the court may direct that the defendant be confined in an
appropriate institution located near the place where the court sits. The
court must conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant has a
dangerous mental disorder. At such hearing, the applicant, whether he be
the commissioner or the district attorney must establish to the
satisfaction of the court that the defendant has a dangerous mental
disorder. If the applicant is the commissioner, the district attorney
shall be entitled to appear and present evidence at such hearing; if the
applicant is the district attorney, the commissioner shall be entitled
to appear and present evidence at such hearing. If the court finds that
the defendant has a dangerous mental disorder, it must issue a
recommitment order. When a defendant is in the custody of the
commissioner pursuant to a recommitment order, the procedures set forth
in subdivisions eight and nine of this section for the issuance of
retention orders shall govern the application for and the issuance of a
first retention order, a second retention order, and subsequent
retention orders.
15. Designation of psychiatric examiners. If, at any hearing conducted
under this section to determine the defendant's present mental
condition, the court is not satisfied with the findings of the
psychiatric examiners, the court may direct the commissioner to
designate one or more additional psychiatric examiners to conduct an
examination of the defendant and submit a report of their findings. In
addition, the court may on its own motion, or upon request of a party,
may designate one or more psychiatric examiners to examine the defendant
and submit a report of their findings. The district attorney may apply
to the court for an order directing that the defendant submit to an
examination by a psychiatric examiner designated by the district
attorney, and such psychiatric examiner may testify at the hearing.
16. Rehearing and review. Any defendant who is in the custody of the
commissioner pursuant to a commitment order, a retention order, or a
recommitment order, if dissatisfied with such order, may, within thirty
days after the making of such order, obtain a rehearing and review of
the proceedings and of such order in accordance with the provisions of
section 9.35 or 15.35 of the mental hygiene law.
17. Rights of defendants. Subject to the limitations and provisions of
this section, a defendant committed to the custody of the commissioner
pursuant to this section shall have the rights granted to patients under
the mental hygiene law.
18. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person confined by
reason of a commitment order, recommitment order or retention order to a
secure facility may be discharged or released unless the commissioner
shall deliver written notice, at least four days excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and holidays, in advance of such discharge or release to all of
the following:
(a) the district attorney.
(b) the police department having jurisdiction of the area to which the
defendant is to be discharged or released.
(c) any other person the court may designate.
The notices required by this subdivision shall be given by the
facility staff physician who was treating the defendant or, if
unavailable, by the defendant's treatment team leader, but if neither is
immediately available, notice must be given by some other member of the
clinical staff of the facility. Such notice must be given by any means
reasonably calculated to give prompt actual notice.
19. Escape from custody; notice requirements. If a defendant is in the
custody of the commissioner pursuant to an order issued under this
section, and such defendant escapes from custody, immediate notice of
such escape shall be given by the department facility staff to: (a) the
district attorney, (b) the superintendent of state police, (c) the
sheriff of the county where the escape occurred, (d) the police
department having jurisdiction of the area where the escape occurred,
(e) any person the facility staff believes to be in danger, and (f) any
law enforcement agency and any person the facility staff believes would
be able to apprise such endangered person that the defendant has escaped
from the facility. Such notice shall be given as soon as the facility
staff know that the defendant has escaped from the facility and shall
include such information as will adequately identify the defendant and
the person or persons believed to be in danger and the nature of the
danger. The notices required by this subdivision shall be given by the
facility staff physician who was treating the defendant or, if
unavailable, by the defendant's treatment team leader, but if neither is
immediately available, notice must be given by some other member of the
clinical staff of the facility. Such notice must be given by any means
reasonably calculated to give prompt actual notice. The defendant may be
apprehended, restrained, transported to, and returned to the facility
from which he escaped by any peace officer, and it shall be the duty of
the officer to assist any representative of the commissioner to take the
defendant into custody upon the request of such representative.
20. Required affidavit. No application may be made by the commissioner
under this section without an accompanying affidavit from at least one
psychiatric examiner supportive of relief requested in the application,
which affidavit shall be served on all parties entitled to receive the
notice of application. Such affidavit shall set forth the defendant's
clinical diagnosis, a detailed analysis of his or her mental condition
which caused the psychiatric examiner to formulate an opinion, and the
opinion of the psychiatric examiner with respect to the defendant. Any
application submitted without the required affidavit shall be dismissed
by the court.
21. Appeals. (a) A party to proceedings conducted in accordance with
the provisions of this section may take an appeal to an intermediate
appellate court by permission of the intermediate appellate court as
follows:
(i) the commissioner may appeal from any release order, retention
order, transfer order, discharge order, order of conditions, or
recommitment order, for which he has not applied;
(ii) a defendant, or the mental hygiene legal service on his or her
behalf, may appeal from any commitment order, retention order,
recommitment order, or, if the defendant has obtained a rehearing and
review of any such order pursuant to subdivision sixteen of this
section, from an order, not otherwise appealable as of right, issued in
accordance with the provisions of section 9.35 or 15.35 of the mental
hygiene law authorizing continued retention under the original order,
provided, however, that a defendant who takes an appeal from a
commitment order, retention order, or recommitment order may not
subsequently obtain a rehearing and review of such order pursuant to
subdivision sixteen of this section;
(iii) the district attorney may appeal from any release order,
transfer order, discharge order, order of conditions, furlough order, or
order denying an application for a recommitment order which he opposed.
(b) An aggrieved party may appeal from a final order of the
intermediate appellate court to the court of appeals by permission of
the intermediate appellate court granted before application to the court
of appeals, or by permission of the court of appeals upon refusal by the
intermediate appellate court or upon direct application.
(c) An appeal taken under this subdivision shall be deemed civil in
nature, and shall be governed by the laws and rules applicable to civil
appeals; provided, however, that a stay of the order appealed from must
be obtained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (d) hereof.
(d) The court from or to which an appeal is taken may stay all
proceedings to enforce the order appealed from pending an appeal or
determination on a motion for permission to appeal, or may grant a
limited stay, except that only the court to which an appeal is taken may
vacate, limit, or modify a stay previously granted. If the order
appealed from is affirmed or modified, the stay shall continue for five
days after service upon the appellant of the order of affirmance or
modification with notice of its entry in the court to which the appeal
was taken. If a motion is made for permission to appeal from such an
order, before the expiration of the five days, the stay, or any other
stay granted pending determination of the motion for permission to
appeal, shall:
(i) if the motion is granted, continue until five days after the
appeal is determined; or
(ii) if the motion is denied, continue until five days after the
movant is served with the order of denial with notice of its entry.
22. Any special order of conditions issued pursuant to subparagraph
(i) or (ii) of paragraph (o) of subdivision one of this section shall
bear in a conspicuous manner the term "special order of conditions" and
a copy shall be filed by the clerk of the court with the sheriff's
office in the county in which anyone intended to be protected by such
special order resides, or, if anyone intended to be protected by such
special order resides within a city, with the police department of such
city. The absence of language specifying that the order is a "special
order of conditions" shall not affect the validity of such order. A copy
of such special order of conditions may from time to time be filed by
the clerk of the court with any other police department or sheriff's
office having jurisdiction of the residence, work place, or school of
anyone intended to be protected by such special order. A copy of such
special order may also be filed by anyone intended to be protected by
such provisions at the appropriate police department or sheriff's office
having jurisdiction. Any subsequent amendment or revocation of such
special order may be filed in the same manner as provided in this
subdivision. Such special order of conditions shall plainly state the
date that the order expires.
Removal after verdict.
1. Where a defendant is a juvenile offender or an adolescent offender
who does not stand convicted of murder in the second degree, upon motion
and with the consent of the district attorney, the action may be removed
to the family court in the interests of justice pursuant to article
seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter notwithstanding the verdict.
2. If the district attorney consents to the motion for removal
pursuant to this section, he shall file a subscribed memorandum with the
court setting forth (1) a recommendation that the interests of justice
would best be served by removal of the action to the family court; and
(2) if the conviction is of an offense set forth in paragraph (b) of
subdivision one of section 722.22 of this chapter, specific factors, one
or more of which reasonably support the recommendation, showing, (i)
mitigating circumstances that bear directly upon the manner in which the
crime was committed, or (ii) where the defendant was not the sole
participant in the crime, that the defendant's participation was
relatively minor although not so minor as to constitute a defense to
prosecution, or (iii) where the juvenile offender has no previous
adjudications of having committed a designated felony act, as defined in
subdivision eight of section 301.2 of the family court act, regardless
of the age of the offender at the time of commission of the act, that
the criminal act was not part of a pattern of criminal behavior and, in
view of the history of the offender, is not likely to be repeated.
3. If the court is of the opinion, based upon the specific factors set
forth in the district attorney's memorandum, that the interests of
justice would best be served by removal of the action to the family
court, the verdict shall be set aside and a plea of guilty of a crime or
act for which the defendant is not criminally responsible may be entered
pursuant to subdivision three or four of section 220.10 of this chapter.
Upon accepting any such plea, the court must specify upon the record the
portion or portions of the district attorney's statement the court is
relying upon as the basis of its opinion and that it believes the
interests of justice would best be served by removal of the proceeding
to the family court. Such plea shall then be deemed to be a juvenile
delinquency fact determination and the court upon entry thereof must
direct that the action be removed to the family court in accordance with
the provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter.
Motion to set aside verdict; grounds for.
At any time after rendition of a verdict of guilty and before
sentence, the court may, upon motion of the defendant, set aside or
modify the verdict or any part thereof upon the following grounds:
1. Any ground appearing in the record which, if raised upon an appeal
from a prospective judgment of conviction, would require a reversal or
modification of the judgment as a matter of law by an appellate court.
2. That during the trial there occurred, out of the presence of the
court, improper conduct by a juror, or improper conduct by another
person in relation to a juror, which may have affected a substantial
right of the defendant and which was not known to the defendant prior to
the rendition of the verdict; or
3. That new evidence has been discovered since the trial which could
not have been produced by the defendant at the trial even with due
diligence on his part and which is of such character as to create a
probability that had such evidence been received at the trial the
verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant.
Motion to set aside verdict; procedure.
1. A motion to set aside a verdict based upon a ground specified in
subdivision one of section 330.30 need not be in writing, but the people
must be given reasonable notice thereof and an opportunity to appear in
opposition thereto.
2. A motion to set aside a verdict based upon a ground specified in
subdivisions two and three of section 330.30 must be made and determined
as follows:
(a) The motion must be in writing and upon reasonable notice to the
people. The moving papers must contain sworn allegations, whether by
the defendant or by another person or persons, of the occurrence or
existence of all facts essential to support the motion. Such sworn
allegations may be based upon personal knowledge of the affiant or upon
information and belief, provided that in the latter event the affiant
must state the sources of such information and the grounds of such
belief;
(b) The people may file with the court, and in such case must serve a
copy thereof upon the defendant or his counsel, an answer denying or
admitting any or all of the allegations of the moving papers;
(c) After all papers of both parties have been filed, the court must
consider the same and, if the motion is determinable pursuant to
paragraphs (d) or (e), must or may, as therein provided, determine the
motion without holding a hearing to resolve questions of fact;
(d) The court must grant the motion if:
(i) The moving papers allege a ground constituting legal basis for
the motion; and
(ii) Such papers contain sworn allegations of all facts essential to
support such ground; and
(iii) All the essential facts are conceded by the people to be true.
(e) The court may deny the motion if:
(i) The moving papers do not allege any ground constituting legal
basis for the motion; or
(ii) The moving papers do not contain sworn allegations of all facts
essential to support the motion.
(f) If the court does not determine the motion pursuant to paragraphs
(d) or (e), it must conduct a hearing and make findings of fact
essential to the determination thereof;
(g) Upon such a hearing, the defendant has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the
motion.
Motion to set aside verdict; order granting motion.
1. Upon setting aside or modifying a verdict or a part thereof upon a
ground specified in subdivision one of section 330.30, the court must
take the same action as the appropriate appellate court would be
required to take upon reversing or modifying a judgment upon the
particular ground in issue.
2. Upon setting aside a verdict upon a ground specified in
subdivision two of section 330.30, the court must order a new trial.
3. Upon setting aside a verdict upon a ground specified in
subdivision three of section 330.30, the court must, except as otherwise
provided in this subdivision, order a new trial. If a verdict is set
aside upon the ground that had the newly discovered evidence in question
been received at the trial the verdict probably would have been more
favorable to the defendant in that the conviction probably would have
been for a lesser offense than the one contained in the verdict, the
court may either (a) set aside such verdict or (b) with the consent of
the people modify such verdict by reducing it to one of conviction of
such lesser offense.
4. Upon a new trial resulting from an order setting aside a verdict,
the indictment is deemed to contain all the counts and to charge all the
offenses which it contained and charged at the time the previous trial
was commenced, regardless of whether any count was dismissed by the
court in the course of such trial, except those upon or of which the
defendant was acquitted or is deemed to have been acquitted.
TITLE K Prosecution of Informations In Local Criminal Courts-plea to Sentence
ARTICLE 340 Pre-trial Proceedings
Definition of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this title:
1. "Information," in addition to its meaning as defined in
subdivision one of section 100.10, includes (a) a simplified information
and (b) a prosecutor's information and (c) a misdemeanor complaint upon
which the defendant, by a waiver executed pursuant to subdivision three
of section 170.65, has consented to be prosecuted.
2. "Single judge trial" means a trial in a local criminal court
conducted by one judge sitting without a jury.
3. "Jury trial" means a trial in a local criminal court conducted by
one judge sitting with a jury.
The plea.
1. Except as provided in subdivisions two and three, the provisions
of article two hundred twenty, governing the kinds of pleas to
indictments which may be entered and related matters, are, to the extent
that they can be so applied, applicable to pleas to informations, and
changes of pleas thereto, in local criminal courts.
2. A plea to an information, other than one against a corporation,
must be entered in the following manner:
(a) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b), a plea to an
information must be entered orally by the defendant in person unless the
court permits entry thereof by counsel upon the filing by him of a
written and subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he
waives his right to plead to the information in person and authorizing
his attorney to enter a plea on his behalf as set forth in the
authorization.
(b) If the only offense or offenses charged are traffic infractions,
the procedure provided in sections eighteen hundred five, eighteen
hundred six and eighteen hundred seven of the vehicle and traffic law,
relating to pleas in such cases, is, when appropriate, applicable and
controlling.
3. A plea to an information against a corporation must be entered by
counsel.
4. When a sentence is agreed upon by the prosecutor and a defendant as
a predicate to entry of a plea of guilty, the court or the prosecutor
must orally on the record, or in writing filed with the court, state the
sentence agreed upon as a condition of such plea.
Pre-trial discovery and notices of defenses.
The provisions of article two hundred forty-five of this part,
concerning pre-trial discovery by a defendant under indictment in a
superior court, and article two hundred fifty of this part, concerning
pre-trial notice to the people by a defendant under indictment in a
superior court who intends to advance a trial defense of mental disease
or defect or of alibi, apply to a prosecution of an information in a
local criminal court.
Modes of trial.
1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a trial of an
information in a local criminal court must be a single judge trial.
2. In any local criminal court a defendant who has entered a plea of
not guilty to an information which charges a misdemeanor must be
accorded a jury trial, conducted pursuant to article three hundred
sixty. The defendant may at any time before trial waive a jury trial in
the manner prescribed in subdivision two of section 320.10 of this
chapter, and consent to a single judge trial.
3. A defendant entitled to a jury trial pursuant to subdivision two of
this section, shall be so entitled even though the information also
charges an offense for which he is otherwise not entitled to a jury
trial. In such case, the defendant is not entitled both to a jury trial
and a separate single judge trial and the court may not order separate
trials.
4. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in any local criminal
court the trial of a person who is an eligible youth within the meaning
of the youthful offender procedure set forth in article seven hundred
twenty of this chapter and who has not prior to commencement of the
trial been convicted of a crime or adjudicated a youthful offender must
be a single judge trial.
Defendant's presence at trial.
1. Except as provided in subdivision two or three, a defendant must
be personally present during the trial.
2. On motion of a defendant represented by counsel, the court may, in
the absence of an objection by the people, issue an order dispensing
with the requirement that the defendant be personally present at trial.
Such an order may be made only upon the filing of a written and
subscribed statement by the defendant declaring that he waives his right
to be personally present at the trial and authorizing his attorney to
conduct his defense.
3. A defendant who conducts himself in so disorderly and disruptive a
manner that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom may
be removed from the courtroom if, after he has been warned by the court
that he will be removed if he continues such conduct, he continues to
engage in such conduct.
ARTICLE 350 Non-jury Trials
Conduct of single judge trial.
1. A single judge trial of an information in a local criminal court
must be conducted pursuant to this section.
2. The court, in addition to determining all questions of law, is the
exclusive trier of all issues of fact and must render a verdict.
3. The order of the trial must be as follows:
(a) The court may in its discretion permit the parties to deliver
opening addresses. If the court grants such permission to one party, it
must grant it to the other also. If both parties deliver opening
addresses, the people's address must be delivered first.
(b) The order in which evidence must or may be offered by the
respective parties is the same as that applicable to a jury trial of an
indictment as prescribed in subdivisions five, six and seven of section
(c) The court may in its discretion permit the parties to deliver
summations. If the court grants such permission to one party, it must
grant permission to the other also. If both parties deliver summations,
the defendant's summation must be delivered first.
(d) The court must then consider the case and render a verdict.
4. The provisions governing motion practice and general procedure
with respect to a jury trial of an indictment are, wherever appropriate,
applicable to a non-jury trial of an information.
5. If the information contains more than one count, the court must
render a verdict upon each count not previously dismissed or must
otherwise state upon the record its disposition of each such count. A
verdict which does not so dispose of each count constitutes a verdict of
not guilty with respect to each undisposed of count.
6. In rendering a verdict of guilty upon a count charging a
misdemeanor, the court may find the defendant guilty of such misdemeanor
if it is established by legally sufficient trial evidence, or guilty of
any lesser included offense which is established by legally sufficient
trial evidence.
Trial by judicial hearing officer.
1. Notwithstanding any provision of section 350.10 of this article, in
any case where a single judge trial of an information in a local
criminal court is authorized or required, the court may, upon agreement
of the parties, assign a judicial hearing officer to conduct the trial.
Where such assignment is made, the judicial hearing officer shall
entertain the case in the same manner as a court and shall:
(a) determine all questions of law;
(b) act as the exclusive trier of all issues of fact; and
(c) render a verdict.
2. In the discharge of this responsibility, the judicial hearing
officer shall have the same powers as a judge of the court in which the
proceeding is pending. The rules of evidence shall be applicable at a
trial conducted by a judicial hearing officer.
3. Any action taken by a judicial hearing officer in the conduct of a
trial shall be deemed the action of the court in which the proceeding is
pending.
4. This section shall not apply where the single judge trial is of an
information at least one count of which charges a class A misdemeanor.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one of this section,
for all proceedings before the district court of Nassau county the
administrative judge of Nassau county may, and for all proceedings
before the district court of Suffolk county, the administrative judge of
Suffolk county may, without the consent of the parties, assign matters
involving traffic and parking infractions except those described in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of subdivision two of section
three hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a judicial
hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section sixteen
hundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law and for all proceedings
before the Buffalo city court the administrative judge of the eighth
judicial district may, without the consent of the parties, assign
matters involving traffic infractions except those described in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of subdivision two-a of
section three hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a
judicial hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section
sixteen hundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law and for all
proceedings before the Rochester city court the administrative judge of
the seventh judicial district may, without the consent of the parties,
assign matters involving traffic infractions except those described in
paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of subdivision two-b of
section three hundred seventy-one of the general municipal law to a
judicial hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of section
sixteen hundred ninety of the vehicle and traffic law.
ARTICLE 360 Jury Trial
Jury trial; order of trial.
The provisions of section 260.30, governing the order of proceedings
of a jury trial of an indictment in a superior court, are applicable to
a jury trial of an information in a local criminal court.
Trial jury; formation in general.
1. A trial jury consists of six jurors, but "alternate jurors" may be
selected and sworn pursuant to section 360.35.
2. The panel from which the jury is drawn is formed and selected as
prescribed in the uniform district court act, uniform city court act,
and uniform justice court act. In the New York city criminal court the
panel from which the jury is drawn is formed and selected in the same
manner as is prescribed for the formation and selection of a panel in
the supreme court in counties within cities having a population of one
million or more.
Trial jury; challenge to the panel.
1. A challenge to the panel is an objection made to the entire panel
of prospective trial jurors returned for the trial of the action and may
be taken to such panel or to any additional panel that may be ordered by
the court. Such a challenge may be made only by the defendant and only
on the ground that there has been such a departure from the requirements
of the appropriate law in the drawing or return of the panel as to
result in substantial prejudice to the defendant.
2. A challenge to the panel must be made before the selection of the
jury commences, and, if it is not, such challenge is deemed to have been
waived. Such challenge must be made in writing setting forth the facts
constituting the ground of challenge. If such facts are denied by the
people, witnesses may be called and examined by either party. All
issues of fact and questions of law arising on the challenge must be
tried and determined by the court. If a challenge to the panel is
allowed, the court must discharge that panel and order the return of
another panel of prospective trial jurors.
Trial jury; examination of prospective jurors; challenges
generally.
If no challenge to the panel is made as prescribed by section 360.15,
or if such challenge is made and disallowed, the court must direct that
the names of not less than six members of the panel be drawn and called.
Such persons must take their places in the jury box and must be
immediately sworn to answer truthfully questions asked them relative to
their qualifications to serve as jurors in the action. The procedural
rules prescribed in section 270.15 with respect to the examination of
the prospective jurors and to challenges are also applicable to the
selection of a trial jury in a local criminal court.
Trial jury; challenge for cause of an individual juror.
1. A challenge for cause is an objection to a prospective member of
the jury and may be made only on the ground that:
(a) He does not have the qualifications required by the judiciary law;
or
(b) He has a state of mind that is likely to preclude him from
rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at the
trial; or
(c) He is related within the sixth degree by consanguinity or affinity
to the defendant, or to the person allegedly injured by the crime
charged, or to a prospective witness at the trial, or to counsel for the
people or for the defendant; or that he is or was a party adverse to any
such person in a civil action; or that he has complained against or been
accused by any such person in a criminal action; or that he bears some
other relationship to any such person of such nature that it is likely
to preclude him from rendering an impartial verdict; or
(d) He is to be a witness at the trial; or where a prosecutor's
information was filed at the direction of a grand jury, he was a witness
before the grand jury or at the preliminary hearing; or
(e) He or she served on a trial jury in a prior civil or criminal
action involving the same incident charged; or where a prosecutor's
information was filed at the direction of a grand jury, he or she served
on the grand jury which directed such filing.
2. All issues of fact or questions of law arising on the challenge
must be tried and determined by the court. The provisions of subdivision
two of section 270.20 with respect to challenges are also applicable to
the selection of a trial jury in a local criminal court.
Trial jury; peremptory challenge of an individaul juror.
1. A peremptory challenge is an objection to a prospective juror for
which no reason need be assigned. Upon any peremptory challenge, the
court must exclude the person challenged from service.
2. Each party must be allowed three peremptory challenges. When two or
more defendants are tried jointly, such challenges are not multiplied by
the number of defendants, but such defendants are to be treated as a
single party. In any such case, a peremptory challenge by one or more
defendants must be allowed if a majority of the defendants join in such
challenge, or if there is a tie when there is an even number of
defendants. Otherwise, it must be disallowed.
Trial jury; alternate juror.
1. Immediately after the last trial juror is sworn, the court may in
its discretion direct the selection of either one or two additional
jurors to be known as "alternate jurors." The alternate jurors must be
drawn in the same manner, must have the same qualifications, must be
subject to the same examination and challenges for cause and must take
the same oath as the regular jurors. Whether or not a party has used
its peremptory challenge in the selection of the trial jury, one
peremptory challenge is authorized in the selection of the alternate
jurors.
2. The provisions of section 270.35 with respect to alternate jurors
are also applicable to a trial jury in a local criminal court.
Trial jury; conduct of jury trial in general.
A jury trial of an information must be conducted generally in the same
manner as a jury trial of an indictment, and the rules governing
preliminary instructions by the court, supervision of the jury, motion
practice and other procedural matters involved in the conduct of a jury
trial of an indictment are, where appropriate, applicable to the conduct
of a jury trial of an information.
Court's charge and instructions; in general.
The general principles, prescribed in section 300.10, governing the
court's charge to the jury and requests to charge upon a trial of an
indictment, are applicable to a jury trial of an information in a local
criminal court.
Court's submission of information to jury; counts and offenses
to be submitted.
1. The term definitions contained in section 300.30 are applicable to
this section, except that the word "information" is to be substituted
for the word "indictment" wherever the latter appears in said section
300.30.
2. The court may submit to the jury only those counts of an
information remaining therein at the time of its charge which are
supported by legally sufficient trial evidence, and every count not so
supported should be dismissed by a trial order of dismissal. If the
trial evidence is not legally sufficient to establish a misdemeanor
charged in a particular count which the court would otherwise be
required to submit pursuant to this section, but is legally sufficient
to establish a lesser included offense, the court may submit such lesser
included offense and, upon the people's request, must do so. In
submitting a count charging a misdemeanor established by legally
sufficient trial evidence, the court in its discretion may, in addition
to submitting such misdemeanor, submit in the alternative any lesser
included offense if there is a reasonable view of the evidence which
would support a finding that the defendant committed such lesser offense
but did not commit the misdemeanor charged.
3. If the information contains but one count, the court must submit
such count.
4. If a multiple count information contains consecutive counts only,
the court must submit every count thereof.
5. In any case where the information may be more complex by reason of
concurrent counts or inconsistent counts or other factors indicated in
subdivisions three, four and five of section 300.40, relating to
multiple count indictments, the court, in its submission of such
information to the jury, should, so far as practicable, be guided by the
provisions of the said subdivisions of said section 300.40.
6. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the court is
not required to submit to the jury any particular count of a multiple
count information if the people consent that it not be submitted.
7. Every count not submitted to the jury is deemed to have been
dismissed by the court. Where the court, over objection of the people,
refuses to submit a count which is consecutive as to every count
actually submitted, such count is deemed to have been dismissed by a
trial order of dismissal even though no such order was expressly made by
the court.
Deliberation and verdict of jury.
The provisions of article three hundred ten, governing the
deliberation and verdict of a jury upon a jury trial of an indictment in
a superior court, are applicable to a jury trial of an information in a
local criminal court.
ARTICLE 370 Proceedings From Verdict to Sentence
Proceedings from verdict to sentence.
The provisions of article three hundred thirty, governing the
proceedings from verdict to sentence in an action prosecuted by
indictment in a superior court, are applicable to a prosecution by
information in a local criminal court; provided, however, where a
judicial hearing officer has conducted the trial pursuant to section
350.20 of this chapter, all references to a court therein shall be
deemed references to such judicial hearing officer.
Procedure for determining whether certain misdemeanor crimes
are serious offenses under the penal law.
1. When a defendant has been charged with assault in the third degree,
menacing in the third degree, menacing in the second degree, criminal
obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, unlawful imprisonment in
the second degree, coercion in the third degree, criminal tampering in
the third degree, criminal contempt in the second degree, harassment in
the first degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree, criminal
trespass in the third degree, criminal trespass in the second degree,
arson in the fifth degree, or attempt to commit any of the above-listed
offenses, the people shall, at arraignment or no later than forty-five
days after arraignment, serve on the defendant and file with the court a
notice alleging that the defendant and the person alleged to be the
victim of such crime were members of the same family or household as
defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter.
2. Such notice shall include the name of the person alleged to be the
victim of such crime and shall specify the nature of the alleged
relationship as set forth in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this
chapter. Upon conviction of such offense, the court shall advise the
defendant that he or she is entitled to a hearing solely on the
allegation contained in the notice and, if necessary, an adjournment of
the sentencing proceeding in order to prepare for such hearing, and that
if such allegation is sustained, that determination and conviction will
be reported to the division of criminal justice services. If such
allegation is sustained, the court shall report the determination and
conviction to the division of criminal justice services within three
business days.
3. After having been advised by the court as provided in subdivision
two of this section, the defendant may stipulate or admit, orally on the
record or in writing, that he or she is related or situated to the
victim of such crime in the manner described in subdivision one of this
section. In such case, such relationship shall be deemed established. If
the defendant denies that he or she is related or situated to the victim
of the crime as alleged in the notice served by the people, or stands
mute with respect to such allegation, then the people shall bear the
burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is related
or situated to the victim in the manner alleged in the notice. The court
may consider reliable hearsay evidence submitted by either party
provided that it is relevant to the determination of the allegation.
Facts previously proven at trial or elicited at the time of entry of a
plea of guilty shall be deemed established beyond a reasonable doubt and
shall not be relitigated. At the conclusion of the hearing, or upon such
a stipulation or admission, as applicable, the court shall make a
specific written determination with respect to such allegation.
Procedure for the surrender of firearms, rifles and shotguns
upon judgment of conviction for a felony or a serious
offense.
1. Upon judgment of conviction for a felony or a serious offense, the
court shall inquire of the defendant as to the existence of all
firearms, rifles and shotguns he or she owns or possesses. The court
shall order the immediate surrender, pursuant to subparagraph (f) of
paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20 of the penal law and
subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law, of any or all
firearms, rifles and shotguns owned or possessed by the defendant.
2. The court ordering the surrender of any firearms, rifles or
shotguns as provided in this section shall immediately notify the duly
constituted police authorities of the locality of such action and the
division of state police at its office in the city of Albany. The court
shall direct the authority receiving such surrendered firearms, rifles
and shotguns to immediately notify the court of such surrender.
3. The disposition of any firearms, rifles or shotguns surrendered
pursuant to this section shall be in accordance with the provisions of
subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law.
4. The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to limit,
restrict or otherwise impair the authority of the court to order and
direct the surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns owned
or possessed by a defendant pursuant to any other provision of law.
TITLE L Sentence
ARTICLE 380 Sentencing In General
ARTICLE 390 Pre-sentence Reports
Requirement of fingerprint report.
In any case where the defendant is convicted of an offense specified
in subdivision one of section 160.10, the court may not pronounce
sentence until it has received a fingerprint report from the division of
criminal justice services or a police department report with respect to
the defendant's prior arrest record. For such purpose, the court may
use the original fingerprint report obtained after the arrest or
arraignment of the defendant, or it may direct that a new report be
prepared and transmitted to it.
Requirement of HIV related testing in certain cases.
1. (a) In any case where the defendant is convicted of a felony
offense enumerated in any section of article one hundred thirty of the
penal law, or any subdivision of section 130.20 of such law, where an
act of "vaginal sexual contact", "oral sexual contact" or "anal sexual
contact," as those terms are defined in section 130.00 of the penal law,
is required as an essential element for the commission thereof, the
court must, upon a request of the victim, order that the defendant
submit to human immunodeficiency (HIV) related testing. The testing is
to be conducted by a state, county, or local public health officer
designated by the order. Test results, which shall not be disclosed to
the court, shall be communicated to the defendant and the victim named
in the order in accordance with the provisions of section twenty-seven
hundred eighty-five-a of the public health law, but such results and
disclosure need not be completed prior to the imposition of sentence.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the terms "defendant",
"conviction" and "sentence" mean and include, respectively, an "eligible
youth," a "youthful offender finding" and a "youthful offender sentence"
as those terms are defined in section 720.10 of this chapter. The term
"victim" means the person with whom the defendant engaged in an act of
"vaginal sexual contact", "oral sexual contact" or "anal sexual
contact", as those terms are defined in section 130.00 of the penal law,
where such conduct with such victim was the basis for the defendant's
conviction of an offense specified in paragraph (a) of this subdivision.
2. Any request made by the victim pursuant to this section must be in
writing, filed with the court and provided by the court to the defendant
or his or her counsel. The request must be filed with the court prior to
or within ten days after entry of the defendant's conviction; provided
that, for good cause shown, the court may permit such request to be
filed at any time before sentence is imposed.
3. Any requests, related papers and orders made or filed pursuant to
this section, together with any papers or proceedings related thereto,
shall be sealed by the court and not made available for any purpose,
except as may be necessary for the conduct of judicial proceedings
directly related to the provisions of this section. All proceedings on
such requests shall be held in camera.
4. The application for an order to compel a convicted person to
undergo an HIV related test may be made by the victim but, if the victim
is an infant or incompetent person, the application may also be made by
a representative as defined in section twelve hundred one of the civil
practice law and rules. The application must state that (a) the
applicant was the victim of the offense enumerated in paragraph (a) of
subdivision one of this section of which the defendant stands convicted;
and (b) the applicant has been offered counseling by a public health
officer and been advised of (i) the limitations on the information to be
obtained through an HIV test on the proposed subject; (ii) current
scientific assessments of the risk of transmission of HIV from the
exposure he or she may have experienced, and (iii) the need for the
applicant to undergo HIV related testing to definitively determine his
or her HIV status.
5. The court shall conduct a hearing only if necessary to determine if
the applicant is the victim of the offense of which the defendant was
convicted. The court ordered test must be performed within fifteen days
of the date on which the court ordered the test, provided, however, that
whenever the defendant is not tested within the period prescribed by the
court, the court must again order that the defendant undergo an HIV
related test.
6. (a) Test results shall be disclosed subject to the following
limitations, which shall be specified in any order issued pursuant to
this section:
(i) disclosure of confidential HIV related information shall be
limited to that information which is necessary to fulfill the purpose
for which the order is granted;
(ii) disclosure of confidential HIV related information shall be
limited to the person making the application; redisclosure shall be
permitted only to the victim, the victim's immediate family, guardian,
physicians, attorneys, medical or mental health providers and to his or
her past and future contacts to whom there was or is a reasonable risk
of HIV transmission and shall not be permitted to any other person or
the court.
(b) Unless inconsistent with this section, the court's order shall
direct compliance with and conform to the provisions of article
twenty-seven-F of the public health law. Such order shall include
measures to protect against disclosure to others of the identity and HIV
status of the applicant and of the person tested and may include such
other measures as the court deems necessary to protect confidential
information.
7. Any failure to comply with the provisions of this section or
section twenty-seven hundred eighty-five-a of the public health law
shall not impair or affect the validity of any sentence imposed by the
court.
8. No information obtained as a result of a consent, hearing or court
order for testing issued pursuant to this section nor any information
derived therefrom may be used as evidence in any criminal or civil
proceeding against the defendant which relates to events that were the
basis for the defendant's conviction, provided however that nothing
herein shall prevent prosecution of a witness testifying in any court
hearing held pursuant to this section for perjury pursuant to article
two hundred ten of the penal law.
Requirement of pre-sentence report.
1. Requirement for felonies. In any case where a person is convicted
of a felony, the court must order a pre-sentence investigation of the
defendant and it may not pronounce sentence until it has received a
written report of such investigation.
2. Requirement for misdemeanors. Where a person is convicted of a
misdemeanor a pre-sentence report is not required, but the court may not
pronounce any of the following sentences unless it has ordered a
pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and has received a written
report thereof:
(a) A sentence of probation except where the provisions of
subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision four of this section
apply;
(b) A sentence of imprisonment for a term in excess of one hundred
eighty days;
(c) Consecutive sentences of imprisonment with terms aggregating more
than ninety days.
3. Permissible in any case. For purposes of sentence, the court may,
in its discretion, order a pre-sentence investigation and report in any
case, irrespective of whether such investigation and report is required
by subdivision one or two.
4. Waiver. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one or
two of this section, a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and a
written report thereon may be waived by the mutual consent of the
parties and with consent of the judge, stated on the record or in
writing, whenever:
(i) A sentence of imprisonment has been agreed upon by the parties and
will be satisfied by the time served, or
(ii) A sentence of probation or conditional discharge has been agreed
upon by the parties and will be imposed, or
(iii) A report has been prepared in the preceding twelve months, or
(iv) A sentence of probation is revoked.
* Provided, however, a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and
a written report thereon shall not be waived if an indeterminate or
determinate sentence of imprisonment is to be imposed.
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* Provided, however, a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and
a written report thereon shall not be waived if an indeterminate
sentence of imprisonment is to be imposed.
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
(b) Whenever a pre-sentence investigation and report has been waived
pursuant to subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii) of paragraph (a) of this
subdivision and the court determines that such information would be
relevant to the court disposition, a victim impact statement shall be
provided in accordance with this section.
5. Negotiated sentence of imprisonment. In any city having a
population of one million or more and notwithstanding the provisions of
subdivision one or two of this section, a pre-sentence investigation and
written report thereon shall not be required where a negotiated sentence
of imprisonment for a term of three hundred sixty-five days or less has
been mutually agreed upon by the parties with consent of the judge, as a
result of a conviction or revocation of a sentence of probation.
Scope of pre-sentence investigation and report.
1. The investigation. The pre-sentence investigation consists of the
gathering of information with respect to the circumstances attending the
commission of the offense, the defendant's history of delinquency or
criminality, and the defendant's social history, employment history,
family situation, economic status, education, and personal habits. Such
investigation may also include any other matter which the agency
conducting the investigation deems relevant to the question of sentence,
and must include any matter the court directs to be included.
2. Physical and mental examinations. Whenever information is available
with respect to the defendant's physical and mental condition, the
pre-sentence investigation must include the gathering of such
information. In the case of a felony or a class A misdemeanor, or in any
case where a person under the age of twenty-one is convicted of a crime,
the court may order that the defendant undergo a thorough physical or
mental examination in a designated facility and may further order that
the defendant remain in such facility for such purpose for a period not
exceeding thirty days.
3. The report and victim impact statement. (a) The report of the
pre-sentence investigation must contain an analysis of as much of the
information gathered in the investigation as the agency that conducted
the investigation deems relevant to the question of sentence. The report
must also include any other imformation that the court directs to be
included and the material required by paragraph (b) of this subdivision
which shall be considered part of the report.
(b) The report shall also contain a victim impact statement, unless it
appears that such information would be of no relevance to the
recommendation or court disposition, which shall include an analysis of
the victim's version of the offense, the extent of injury or economic
loss and the actual out-of-pocket loss to the victim and the views of
the victim relating to disposition including the amount of restitution
and reparation sought by the victim after the victim has been informed
of the right to seek restitution and reparation, subject to the
availability of such information. In the case of a homicide or where the
victim is unable to assist in the preparation of the victim impact
statement, the information may be acquired from the victim's family. The
victim impact statement shall be made available to the victim by the
prosecutor pursuant to subdivision two of section 390.50 of this
article. Nothing contained in this section shall be interpreted to
require that a victim supply information for the preparation of this
report.
4. Abbreviated investigation and short form report. In lieu of the
procedure set forth in subdivisions one, two and three of this section,
where the conviction is of a misdemeanor the scope of the pre-sentence
investigation may be abbreviated and a short form report may be made.
The use of abbreviated investigations and short form reports, the
matters to be covered therein and the form of the reports shall be in
accordance with the general rules regulating methods and procedures in
the administration of probation as adopted from time to time by the
commissioner of the division of criminal justice services pursuant to
the provisions of article twelve of the executive law. No such rule,
however, shall be construed so as to relieve the agency conducting the
investigation of the duty of investigating and reporting upon:
(a) the extent of the injury or economic loss and the actual
out-of-pocket loss to the victim including the amount of restitution and
reparation sought by the victim, after the victim has been informed of
the right to seek restitution and reparation, or
(b) any matter relevant to the question of sentence that the court
directs to be included in particular cases.
5. Information to be forwarded to the state office of probation and
correctional alternatives. Investigating agencies under this article
shall be responsible for the collection, and transmission to the state
office of probation and correctional alternatives, of data on the number
of victim impact statements prepared. Such information shall be
transmitted annually to the office of victim services and included in
the office's biennial report pursuant to subdivision twenty-one of
section six hundred twenty-three of the executive law.
6. Interim probation supervision. (a) In any case where the court
determines that a defendant is eligible for a sentence of probation, the
court, after consultation with the prosecutor and upon the consent of
the defendant, may adjourn the sentencing to a specified date and order
that the defendant be placed on interim probation supervision. In no
event may the sentencing be adjourned for a period exceeding one year
from the date the conviction is entered, except that upon good cause
shown, the court may, upon the defendant's consent, extend the period
for an additional one year where the defendant has agreed to and is
still participating in a treatment program in connection with a court
designated a treatment court by the chief administrator of the courts.
When ordering that the defendant be placed on interim probation
supervision, the court shall impose all of the conditions relating to
supervision specified in subdivision three of section 65.10 of the penal
law and the court may impose any or all of the conditions relating to
conduct and rehabilitation specified in subdivisions two, four, five and
five-a of section 65.10 of such law. The defendant must receive a
written copy of any such conditions at the time he or she is placed on
interim probation supervision. The defendant's record of compliance with
such conditions, as well as any other relevant information, shall be
included in the presentence report, or updated presentence report,
prepared pursuant to this section, and the court must consider such
record and information when pronouncing sentence. If a defendant
satisfactorily completes a term of interim probation supervision, he or
she shall receive credit for the time served under the period of interim
probation supervision toward any probation sentence that is subsequently
imposed in that case.
(b) In its discretion, the supervising probation department may
utilize the provisions of sections 410.20, 410.30, 410.40, 410.50,
410.60 and 410.92 of this title, where applicable.
Defendant's or prosecutor's pre-sentence memorandum.
1. Either the defendant or prosecutor may, at any time prior to the
pronouncement of sentence, file with the court a written memorandum
setting forth any information he may deem pertinent to the question of
sentence. Such memorandum may include information with respect to any of
the matters described in section 390.30. The defendant may annex written
statements by others in support of facts alleged in the memorandum.
2. The memorandum of the prosecutor shall be served on the defendant's
attorney at least ten days prior to the date fixed for sentence.
3. The act of seeking health care for someone who is experiencing a
drug or alcohol overdose or other life threatening medical emergency
shall be considered by the court when presented as a mitigating factor
in any criminal prosecution for a controlled substance, marihuana, drug
paraphernalia, or alcohol related offense.
Confidentiality of pre-sentence reports and memoranda.
1. In general. Any pre-sentence report or memorandum submitted to the
court pursuant to this article and any medical, psychiatric or social
agency report or other information gathered for the court by a probation
department, or submitted directly to the court, in connection with the
question of sentence is confidential and may not be made available to
any person or public or private agency except where specifically
required or permitted by statute or upon specific authorization of the
court. For purposes of this section, any report, memorandum or other
information forwarded to a probation department within this state from a
probation agency outside this state is governed by the same rules of
confidentiality. Any person, public or private agency receiving such
material must retain it under the same conditions of confidentiality as
apply to the probation department that made it available.
2. Pre-sentence report; disclosure, victim access to impact
statements; general principles. (a) Not less than one court day prior
to sentencing, unless such time requirement is waived by the parties,
the pre-sentence report or memorandum shall be made available by the
court for examination and for copying by the defendant's attorney, the
defendant himself, if he has no attorney, and the prosecutor. In its
discretion, the court may except from disclosure a part or parts of the
report or memoranda which are not relevant to a proper sentence, or a
diagnostic opinion which might seriously disrupt a program of
rehabilitation, or sources of information which have been obtained on a
promise of confidentiality, or any other portion thereof, disclosure of
which would not be in the interest of justice. In all cases where a part
or parts of the report or memoranda are not disclosed, the court shall
state for the record that a part or parts of the report or memoranda
have been excepted and the reasons for its action. The action of the
court excepting information from disclosure shall be subject to
appellate review. The pre-sentence report shall be made available by the
court for examination and copying in connection with any appeal in the
case, including an appeal under this subdivision. Upon written request,
the court shall make a copy of the presentence report, other than a part
or parts of the report redacted by the court pursuant to this paragraph,
available to the defendant for use before the parole board for release
consideration or an appeal of a parole board determination or an
application for resentencing pursuant to section 440.46 or 440.47 of
this chapter. In his or her written request to the court the defendant
shall affirm that he or she anticipates an appearance before the parole
board or intends to file an administrative appeal of a parole board
determination or meets the eligibility criteria for and intends to file
a motion for resentencing pursuant to 440.46 of this chapter or has
received notification from the court which received his or her request
to apply for resentencing pursuant to section 440.47 of this chapter
confirming that he or she is eligible to submit an application for
resentencing pursuant to section 440.47 of this chapter. The court shall
respond to the defendant's written request within twenty days from
receipt of the defendant's written request.
(b) The victim impact statement prepared pursuant to subdivision three
of section 390.30 of this article shall be made available by the
prosecutor prior to sentencing to the victim or victim's family in
accordance with his responsibilities under subdivision one of section
60.27 of the penal law and sections six hundred forty-one and six
hundred forty-two of the executive law. The district attorney shall also
give at least twenty-one days notice to the victim or victim's family of
the date of sentencing and of the rights of the victim pursuant to
subdivision two of section 380.50 of this chapter, including the victim
or victim's family's obligation to inform the court of its intention, at
least ten days prior to the sentencing date, to make a statement at
sentencing. If the victim has not received timely notice pursuant to
this paragraph, the court may proceed with sentencing if it determines
that the victim and the defendant have received reasonable notice or may
adjourn sentencing for no more than seven days in order to afford such
reasonable notice. Failure to give notice shall not affect the validity
of any sentence imposed.
3. Public agencies within this state. A probation department must make
available a copy of its pre-sentence report and any medical, psychiatric
or social agency report submitted to it in connection with its
pre-sentence investigation or its supervision of a defendant, to any
court, or to the probation department of any court, within this state
that subsequently has jurisdiction over such defendant for the purpose
of pronouncing or reviewing sentence and to any state agency to which
the defendant is subsequently committed or certified or under whose care
and custody or jurisdiction the defendant subsequently is placed upon
the official request of such court or agency therefor. In any such case,
the court or agency receiving such material must retain it under the
same conditions of confidentiality as apply to the probation department
that made it available, except that an agency with jurisdiction as that
term is defined in subdivision (a) of section 10.03 of the mental
hygiene law shall make such material available to the commissioner of
mental health, attorney general, case review panel, or psychiatric
examiners described in article ten of the mental hygiene law when such
persons or entities request such material in the exercise of their
statutory functions, powers, and duties under article ten of the mental
hygiene law.
4. Public agencies outside this state. Upon official request of any
probation, parole or public institutional agency outside this state, a
probation department may make any information in its files available to
such agency. Any such release of information shall be conditioned upon
the agreement of the receiving agency to retain it under the same
conditions of confidentiality as apply to the probation department that
made it available.
5. Division of criminal justice services. Nothing contained in this
section may be construed to prevent the voluntary submission by a
probation department of data in its files to the division of criminal
justice services.
6. Professional licensing agencies. Probation departments shall
provide a copy of presentence reports prepared in the case of
individuals who are known to be licensed pursuant to title eight of the
education law to the state department of health if the licensee is a
physician, a specialist's assistant or a physician's assistant, and to
the state education department with respect to all other such licensees.
Such reports shall be accumulated and forwarded every three months,
shall be in writing, may be submitted in a hard copy or electronically,
and shall contain the following information:
(a) the name of the licensee and the profession in which licensure is
held,
(b) the date of the conviction and the nature thereof,
(c) the index or other identifying file number.
In any such case, the state department receiving such material must
retain it under the same conditions of confidentiality as apply to the
probation department that made it available.
Copy of reports to accompany defendant sentenced to
imprisonment.
1. Cases where copy of report is required. Whenever a person is
sentenced to a term of imprisonment, a copy of any pre-sentence report
prepared, a copy of any pre-sentence memorandum filed by the defendant
and a copy of any medical, psychiatric or social agency report submitted
to the court or to the probation department in connection with the
question of sentence must be delivered to the person in charge of the
correctional or division for youth facility to which the defendant is
committed at the time the defendant is delivered thereto. When a person
is committed to any hospital operated by the office of mental health or
referred to any program established pursuant to section four hundred one
of the correction law, from a correctional facility or division for
youth facility, the person in charge of the correctional facility or
division for youth facility shall ensure that a copy of any pre-sentence
report concerning such person, a copy of any pre-sentence memorandum
filed by such person, and a copy of any medical, psychiatric or social
agency report submitted to the court or to the probation department in
connection with the question of sentence is provided to such hospital or
program.
2. Effect of failure to deliver required report. A commitment is not
void by reason of failure to comply with the provisions of subdivision
one, but the person in charge of the correctional facility to which the
defendant has been delivered in execution of the sentence is authorized
to refuse to accept custody of such person until the required report is
delivered.
ARTICLE 400 Pre-sentence Proceedings
Pre-sentence conference.
1. Authorization and purpose. Before pronouncing sentence, the court,
in its discretion, may hold one or more pre-sentence conferences in open
court or in chambers in order to (a) resolve any discrepancies between
the pre-sentence report, or other information the court has received,
and the defendant's or prosecutor's pre-sentence memorandum submitted
pursuant to section 390.40, or (b) assist the court in its consideration
of any matter relevant to the sentence to be pronounced.
2. Attendance. Such conference may be held with the prosecutor and
defense counsel in the absence of the defendant, or the court may direct
that the defendant attend. The court may also direct that any person who
has furnished or who can furnish information to the court concerning
sentence attend. Reasonable notice of the conference must be given to
the prosecutor and the defense counsel, who must be afforded an
opportunity to participate therein.
3. Procedure at conference. The court may advise the persons present
at the conference of the factual contents of any report or memorandum it
has received and afford any of the participants an opportunity to
controvert or to comment upon any fact. The court may also conduct a
summary hearing at the conference on any matter relevant to sentence and
may take testimony under oath. In the discretion of the court, all or
any part of the proceedings at the conference may be recorded by a court
stenographer and the transcript made part of the pre-sentence report.
4. Pre-sentence conditions. After conviction and prior to sentencing
the court may adjourn sentencing to a subsequent date and order the
defendant to comply with any of the conditions contained in paragraphs
(a) through (f) and paragraph (l) of subdivision two of section 65.10 of
the penal law. In imposing sentence, the court shall take into
consideration the defendant's record of compliance with pre-sentence
conditions ordered by the court.
Procedure for determining whether defendant is a second
violent felony offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the
procedure that must be followed in any case where it appears that a
defendant who stands convicted of a violent felony offense as defined in
subdivision one of section 70.02 of the penal law has previously been
subjected to a predicate violent felony conviction as defined in
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.04 of the penal law and
may be a second violent felony offender.
2. Statement to be filed. When information available to the court or
to the people prior to sentencing for a violent felony offense indicates
that the defendant may have previously been subjected to a predicate
violent felony conviction, a statement must be filed by the prosecutor
before sentence is imposed setting forth the date and place of each
alleged predicate violent felony conviction. Where the provisions of
subparagraph (v) of paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section 70.04 of
the penal law apply, such statement also shall set forth the date of
commencement and the date of termination as well as the place of
imprisonment for each period of incarceration to be used for tolling of
the ten year limitation set forth in subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b)
of such subdivision.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of
such statement and the court must ask him whether he wishes to
controvert any allegation made therein. If the defendant wishes to
controvert any allegation in the statement, he must specify the
particular allegation or allegations he wishes to controvert.
Uncontroverted allegations in the statement shall be deemed to have been
admitted by the defendant.
4. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the
uncontroverted allegations in the statement are sufficient to support a
finding that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate violent
felony conviction the court must enter such finding and when imposing
sentence must sentence the defendant in accordance with the provisions
of section 70.04 of the penal law.
5. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement and the uncontroverted
allegations in such statement are not sufficient to support a finding
that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate violent felony
conviction the court must proceed to hold a hearing.
6. Time for hearing. In any case where a copy of the statement was
not received by the defendant at least two days prior to the preliminary
examination, the court must upon request of the defendant grant an
adjournment of at least two days before proceeding with the hearing.
7. Manner of conducting hearing.
(a) A hearing pursuant to this section must be before the court
without jury. The burden of proof is upon the people and a finding that
the defendant has been subjected to a predicate violent felony
conviction must be based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt by
evidence admissible under the rules applicable to a trial of the issue
of guilt.
(b) A previous conviction in this or any other jurisdiction which was
obtained in violation of the rights of the defendant under the
applicable provisions of the constitution of the United States must not
be counted in determining whether the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate violent felony conviction. The defendant may, at any time
during the course of the hearing hereunder controvert an allegation with
respect to such conviction in the statement on the grounds that the
conviction was unconstitutionally obtained. Failure to challenge the
previous conviction in the manner provided herein constitutes a waiver
on the part of the defendant of any allegation of unconstitutionality
unless good cause be shown for such failure to make timely challenge.
(c) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must make a finding as
to whether or not the defendant has been subjected to a predicate
violent felony conviction.
8. Subsequent use of predicate violent felony conviction finding.
Where a finding has been entered pursuant to this section, such finding
shall be binding upon that defendant in any future proceeding in which
the issue may arise.
Procedure for determining whether defendant is a persistent
violent felony offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the procedure
that must be followed in any case where it appears that a defendant who
stands convicted of a violent felony offense as defined in subdivision
one of section 70.02 of the penal law has previously been subjected to
two or more predicate violent felony convictions as defined in paragraph
(b) of subdivision one of section 70.04, and may be a persistent violent
felony offender as defined in section 70.08 of the penal law.
2. Statement; preliminary examination; hearing; subsequent use of
predicate violent felony conviction finding. The requirements set forth
in subdivisions two, three, four, five, six, seven and eight of section
400.15 with respect to the statement to be filed, preliminary
examination, hearing and subsequent use of a predicate violent felony
conviction finding in the case of a second violent felony offender,
shall also apply to a determination of whether a defendant has been
subjected to two or more violent predicate felony convictions and is a
persistent violent felony offender.
Procedure for determining whether defendant is a second child
sexual assault felony offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the procedure
that must be followed in any case where it appears that a defendant who
stands convicted of a felony offense for a sexual assault upon a child
as defined in section 70.07 of the penal law has previously been
convicted of a predicate felony for a sexual assault upon a child.
2. Statement to be filed. When information available to the people
prior to the trial of a felony offense for a sexual assault against a
child indicates that the defendant may have previously been subjected to
a predicate felony conviction for a sexual assault against a child, a
statement may be filed by the prosecutor at any time before trial
commences setting forth the date and place of each alleged predicate
felony conviction for a sexual assault against a child and a statement
whether the defendant was eighteen years of age or older at the time of
the commission of the predicate felony. Where the provisions of
subparagraph (v) of paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.06 of
the penal law apply, such statement also shall set forth the date of
commencement and the date of termination as well as the place of
imprisonment for each period of incarceration to be used for tolling of
the ten year limitation set forth in subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b)
of such subdivision.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of such
statement and the court must ask him whether he wishes to controvert any
allegation made therein. If the defendant wishes to controvert any
allegation in the statement, he must specify the particular allegation
or allegations he wishes to controvert. Uncontroverted allegations in
the statement shall be deemed to have been admitted by the defendant.
4. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the
uncontroverted allegations in the statement are sufficient to support a
finding that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction for a sexual assault upon a child and that the defendant was
18 years of age or older at the time of the commission of the predicate
felony, the court must enter such finding and when imposing sentence
must sentence the defendant in accordance with the provisions of section
70.07 of the penal law.
5. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement, the court must proceed to
hold a hearing.
6. Manner of conducting hearing. (a) A hearing pursuant to this
section must be before the court without jury. The burden of proof is
upon the people and a finding that the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction for a sexual assault against a child as
defined in subdivision two of section 70.07 of the penal law and that
the defendant was 18 years of age or older at the time of the commission
of the predicate felony must be based upon proof beyond a reasonable
doubt by evidence admissible under the rules applicable to a trial of
the issue of guilt.
(b) Regardless of whether the age of the victim is an element of the
alleged predicate felony offense, where the defendant controverts an
allegation that the victim of an alleged sexual assault upon a child was
less than fifteen years old, the people may prove that the child was
less than fifteen years old by any evidence admissible under the rules
applicable to a trial of the issue of guilt. For purposes of determining
whether a child was less than fifteen years old, the people shall not be
required to prove that the defendant knew the child was less than
fifteen years old at the time of the alleged sexual assault.
(c) A previous conviction in this or any other jurisdiction which was
obtained in violation of the rights of the defendant under the
applicable provisions of the constitution of the United States must not
be counted in determining whether the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction for a sexual assault upon a child. The
defendant may, at any time during the course of the hearing hereunder,
controvert an allegation with respect to such conviction in the
statement on the grounds that the conviction was unconstitutionally
obtained. Failure to challenge the previous conviction in the manner
provided herein constitutes a waiver on the part of the defendant of any
allegation of unconstitutionality unless good cause be shown for such
failure to make timely challenge.
(d) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must make a finding as
to whether or not the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction for a sexual assault against a child as defined in
subdivision two of section 70.07 of the penal law and whether the
defendant was 18 years of age or older at the time of the commission of
the predicate felony.
7. Subsequent use of predicate felony conviction finding. Where a
finding has been entered pursuant to this section, such finding shall be
binding in any future proceeding in which the issue may arise.
Procedure for determining whether defendant should be
sentenced as a persistent felony offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the
procedure that must be followed in order to impose the persistent felony
offender sentence authorized by subdivision two of section 70.10 of the
penal law. Such sentence may not be imposed unless, based upon evidence
in the record of a hearing held pursuant to this section, the court (a)
has found that the defendant is a persistent felony offender as defined
in subdivision one of section 70.10 of the penal law, and (b) is of the
opinion that the history and character of the defendant and the nature
and circumstances of his criminal conduct are such that extended
incarceration and lifetime supervision of the defendant are warranted to
best serve the public interest.
2. Authorization for hearing. When information available to the
court prior to sentencing indicates that the defendant is a persistent
felony offender, and when, in the opinion of the court, the available
information shows that a persistent felony offender sentence may be
warranted, the court may order a hearing to determine (a) whether the
defendant is in fact a persistent felony offender, and (b) if so,
whether a persistent felony offender sentence should be imposed.
3. Order directing a hearing. An order directing a hearing to
determine whether the defendant should be sentenced as a persistent
felony offender must be filed with the clerk of the court and must
specify a date for the hearing not less than twenty days from the date
the order is filed. The court must annex to and file with the order a
statement setting forth the following:
(a) The dates and places of the previous convictions which render the
defendant a persistent felony offender as defined in subdivision one of
section 70.10 of the penal law; and
(b) The factors in the defendant's background and prior criminal
conduct which the court deems relevant for the purpose of sentencing the
defendant as a persistent felony offender.
4. Notice of hearing. Upon receipt of the order and statement of the
court, the clerk of the court must send a notice of hearing to the
defendant, his counsel and the district attorney. Such notice must
specify the time and place of the hearing and the fact that the purpose
of the hearing is to determine whether or not the defendant should be
sentenced as a persistent felony offender. Each notice required to be
sent hereunder must be accompanied by a copy of the statement of the
court.
5. Burden and standard of proof; evidence. Upon any hearing held
pursuant to this section the burden of proof is upon the people. A
finding that the defendant is a persistent felony offender, as defined
in subdivision one of section 70.10 of the penal law, must be based upon
proof beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence admissible under the rules
applicable to the trial of the issue of guilt. Matters pertaining to
the defendant's history and character and the nature and circumstances
of his criminal conduct may be established by any relevant evidence, not
legally privileged, regardless of admissibility under the exclusionary
rules of evidence, and the standard of proof with respect to such
matters shall be a preponderance of the evidence.
6. Constitutionality of prior convictions. A previous conviction in
this or any other jurisdiction which was obtained in violation of the
rights of the defendant under the applicable provisions of the
Constitution of the United States may not be counted in determining
whether the defendant is a persistent felony offender. The defendant
may, at any time during the course of the hearing hereunder controvert
an allegation with respect to such conviction in the statement of the
court on the grounds that the conviction was unconstitutionally
obtained. Failure to challenge the previous conviction in the manner
provided herein constitutes a waiver on the part of the defendant of any
allegation of unconstitutionality unless good cause be shown for such
failure to make timely challenge.
7. Preliminary examination. When the defendant appears for the
hearing the court must ask him whether he wishes to controvert any
allegation made in the statement prepared by the court, and whether he
wishes to present evidence on the issue of whether he is a persistent
felony offender or on the question of his background and criminal
conduct. If the defendant wishes to controvert any allegation in the
statement of the court, he must specify the particular allegation or
allegations he wishes to controvert. If he wishes to present evidence
in his own behalf, he must specify the nature of such evidence.
Uncontroverted allegations in the statement of the court are deemed
evidence in the record.
8. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the
uncontroverted allegations in the statement of the court are sufficient
to support a finding that the defendant is a persistent felony offender
and the court is satisfied that (a) the uncontroverted allegations with
respect to the defendant's background and the nature of his prior
criminal conduct warrant sentencing the defendant as a persistent felony
offender, and (b) the defendant either has no relevant evidence to
present or the facts which could be established through the evidence
offered by the defendant would not affect the court's decision, the
court may enter a finding that the defendant is a persistent felony
offender and sentence him in accordance with the provisions of
subdivision two of section 70.10 of the penal law.
9. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement of the court and the
uncontroverted allegations in such statement are not sufficient to
support a finding that the defendant is a persistent felony offender as
defined in subdivision one of section 70.10 of the penal law, or where
the uncontroverted allegations with respect to the defendant's history
and the nature of his prior criminal conduct do not warrant sentencing
him as a persistent felony offender, or where the defendant has offered
to present evidence to establish facts that would affect the court's
decision on the question of whether a persistent felony offender
sentence is warranted, the court may fix a date for a further hearing.
Such hearing shall be before the court without a jury and either party
may introduce evidence with respect to the controverted allegations or
any other matter relevant to the issue of whether or not the defendant
should be sentenced as a persistent felony offender. At the conclusion
of the hearing the court must make a finding as to whether or not the
defendant is a persistent felony offender and, upon a finding that he is
such, must then make such findings of fact as it deems relevant to the
question of whether a persistent felony offender sentence is warranted.
If the court both finds that the defendant is a persistent felony
offender and is of the opinion that a persistent felony offender
sentence is warranted, it may sentence the defendant in accordance with
the provisions of subdivision two of section 70.10 of the penal law.
10. Termination of hearing. At any time during the pendency of a
hearing pursuant to this section, the court may, in its discretion,
terminate the hearing without making any finding. In such case, unless
the court recommences the proceedings and makes the necessary findings,
the defendant may not be sentenced as a persistent felony offender.
Procedure for determining whether defendant is a second felony
offender or a second felony drug offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the procedure
that must be followed in any case where it appears that a defendant who
stands convicted of a felony has previously been convicted of a
predicate felony and may be a second felony offender as defined in
section 70.06 of the penal law or a second felony drug offender as
defined in either paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.70 of
the penal law, or paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.71 of
the penal law.
2. Statement to be filed. When information available to the court or
to the people prior to sentencing for a felony indicates that the
defendant may have previously been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction, a statement must be filed by the prosecutor before sentence
is imposed setting forth the date and place of each alleged predicate
felony conviction and whether the predicate felony conviction was a
violent felony as that term is defined in subdivision one of section
70.02 of the penal law, or in any other jurisdiction of an offense which
includes all of the essential elements of any such felony for which a
sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year or death was
authorized and is authorized in this state regardless of whether such
sentence was imposed. Where the provisions of subparagraph (v) of
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.06 of the penal law
apply, such statement also shall set forth the date of commencement and
the date of termination as well as the state or local incarcerating
agency for each period of incarceration to be used for tolling of the
ten year limitation set forth in subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b) of
such subdivision.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of such
statement and the court must ask him or her whether he or she wishes to
controvert any allegation made therein. If the defendant wishes to
controvert any allegation in the statement, he must specify the
particular allegation or allegations he wishes to controvert.
Uncontroverted allegations in the statement shall be deemed to have been
admitted by the defendant.
4. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the
uncontroverted allegations in the statement are sufficient to support a
finding that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction the court must enter such finding, including a finding that
the predicate felony conviction was of a violent felony as that term is
defined in subdivision one of section 70.02 of the penal law, or in any
other jurisdiction of an offense which includes all of the essential
elements of any such felony for which a sentence to a term of
imprisonment in excess of one year or death was authorized and is
authorized in this state regardless of whether such sentence was
imposed, and when imposing sentence must sentence the defendant in
accordance with the applicable provisions of section 70.06, 70.70 or
70.71 of the penal law.
5. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement and the uncontroverted
allegations in such statement are not sufficient to support a finding
that the defendant has been subjected to such a predicate felony
conviction the court must proceed to hold a hearing.
6. Time for hearing. In any case where a copy of the statement was not
received by the defendant at least two days prior to the preliminary
examination, the court must upon request of the defendant grant an
adjournment of at least two days before proceeding with the hearing.
7. Manner of conducting hearing. (a) A hearing pursuant to this
section must be before the court without jury. The burden of proof is
upon the people and a finding that the defendant has been subjected to
such a predicate felony conviction must be based upon proof beyond a
reasonable doubt by evidence admissible under the rules applicable to a
trial of the issue of guilt.
(b) A previous conviction in this or any other jurisdiction which was
obtained in violation of the rights of the defendant under the
applicable provisions of the constitution of the United States must not
be counted in determining whether the defendant has been subjected to
such a predicate felony conviction. The defendant may, at any time
during the course of the hearing hereunder controvert an allegation with
respect to such conviction in the statement on the grounds that the
conviction was unconstitutionally obtained. Failure to challenge the
previous conviction in the manner provided herein constitutes a waiver
on the part of the defendant of any allegation of unconstitutionality
unless good cause be shown for such failure to make timely challenge.
(c) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must make a finding as
to whether or not the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction, including a finding as to whether or not the predicate
felony conviction was of a violent felony as that term is defined in
subdivision one of section 70.02 of the penal law, or in any other
jurisdiction of an offense which includes all of the essential elements
of any such felony for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in
excess of one year or death was authorized and is authorized in this
state regardless of whether such sentence was imposed.
8. Subsequent use of predicate felony conviction finding. Where a
finding has been entered pursuant to this section, such finding shall be
binding upon that defendant in any future proceeding in which the issue
may arise.
Evidence of imprisonment.
The certificate of the commissioner of correction or of the warden or
other chief officer of any prison, or of the superintendent or other
chief officer of any penitentiary under the seal of his office
containing name of person, a statement of the court in which conviction
was had, the date and term of sentence, length of time imprisoned, and
date of discharge from prison or penitentiary, shall be prima facie
evidence of the imprisonment and discharge of any person under the
conviction stated and set forth in such certificate for the purposes of
any proceeding under section 400.20.
Procedure for determining sentence upon conviction for the
offense of murder in the first degree.
1. Upon the conviction of a defendant for the offense of murder in the
first degree as defined by section 125.27 of the penal law, the court
shall promptly conduct a separate sentencing proceeding to determine
whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or to life
imprisonment without parole pursuant to subdivision five of section
70.00 of the penal law. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to
preclude the people at any time from determining that the death penalty
shall not be sought in a particular case, in which case the separate
sentencing proceeding shall not be conducted and the court may sentence
such defendant to life imprisonment without parole or to a sentence of
imprisonment for the class A-I felony of murder in the first degree
other than a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
2. The separate sentencing proceeding provided for by this section
shall be conducted before the court sitting with the jury that found the
defendant guilty. The court may discharge the jury and impanel another
jury only in extraordinary circumstances and upon a showing of good
cause, which may include, but is not limited to, a finding of prejudice
to either party. If a new jury is impaneled, it shall be formed in
accordance with the procedures in article two hundred seventy of this
chapter. Before proceeding with the jury that found the defendant
guilty, the court shall determine whether any juror has a state of mind
that is likely to preclude the juror from rendering an impartial
decision based upon the evidence adduced during the proceeding. In
making such determination the court shall personally examine each juror
individually outside the presence of the other jurors. The scope of the
examination shall be within the discretion of the court and may include
questions supplied by the parties as the court deems proper. The
proceedings provided for in this subdivision shall be conducted on the
record; provided, however, that upon motion of either party, and for
good cause shown, the court may direct that all or a portion of the
record of such proceedings be sealed. In the event the court determines
that a juror has such a state of mind, the court shall discharge the
juror and replace the juror with the alternate juror whose name was
first drawn and called. If no alternate juror is available, the court
must discharge the jury and impanel another jury in accordance with
article two hundred seventy of this chapter.
3. For the purposes of a proceeding under this section each
subparagraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 125.27 of
the penal law shall be deemed to define an aggravating factor. Except as
provided in subdivision seven of this section, at a sentencing
proceeding pursuant to this section the only aggravating factors that
the jury may consider are those proven beyond a reasonable doubt at
trial, and no other aggravating factors may be considered. Whether a
sentencing proceeding is conducted before the jury that found the
defendant guilty or before another jury, the aggravating factor or
factors proved at trial shall be deemed established beyond a reasonable
doubt at the separate sentencing proceeding and shall not be
relitigated. Where the jury is to determine sentences for concurrent
counts of murder in the first degree, the aggravating factor included in
each count shall be deemed to be an aggravating factor for the purpose
of the jury's consideration in determining the sentence to be imposed on
each such count.
4. The court on its own motion or on motion of either party, in the
interest of justice or to avoid prejudice to either party, may delay the
commencement of the separate sentencing proceeding.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of article three hundred ninety of
this chapter, where a defendant is found guilty of murder in the first
degree, no presentence investigation shall be conducted; provided,
however, that where the court is to impose a sentence of imprisonment, a
presentence investigation shall be conducted and a presentence report
shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of such article.
6. At the sentencing proceeding the people shall not relitigate the
existence of aggravating factors proved at the trial or otherwise
present evidence, except, subject to the rules governing admission of
evidence in the trial of a criminal action, in rebuttal of the
defendant's evidence. However, when the sentencing proceeding is
conducted before a newly impaneled jury, the people may present evidence
to the extent reasonably necessary to inform the jury of the nature and
circumstances of the count or counts of murder in the first degree for
which the defendant was convicted in sufficient detail to permit the
jury to determine the weight to be accorded the aggravating factor or
factors established at trial. Whenever the people present such evidence,
the court must instruct the jury in its charge that any facts elicited
by the people that are not essential to the verdict of guilty on such
count or counts shall not be deemed established beyond a reasonable
doubt. Subject to the rules governing the admission of evidence in the
trial of a criminal action, the defendant may present any evidence
relevant to any mitigating factor set forth in subdivision nine of this
section; provided, however, the defendant shall not be precluded from
the admission of reliable hearsay evidence. The burden of establishing
any of the mitigating factors set forth in subdivision nine of this
section shall be on the defendant, and must be proven by a preponderance
of the evidence. The people shall not offer evidence or argument
relating to any mitigating factor except in rebuttal of evidence offered
by the defendant.
7. (a) The people may present evidence at the sentencing proceeding to
prove that in the ten year period prior to the commission of the crime
of murder in the first degree for which the defendant was convicted, the
defendant has previously been convicted of two or more offenses
committed on different occasions; provided, that each such offense shall
be either (i) a class A felony offense other than one defined in article
two hundred twenty of the penal law, a class B violent felony offense
specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 70.02 of the
penal law, or a felony offense under the penal law a necessary element
of which involves either the use or attempted use or threatened use of a
deadly weapon or the intentional infliction of or the attempted
intentional infliction of serious physical injury or death, or (ii) an
offense under the laws of another state or of the United States
punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than one year a necessary
element of which involves either the use or attempted use or threatened
use of a deadly weapon or the intentional infliction of or the attempted
intentional infliction of serious physical injury or death. For the
purpose of this paragraph, the term "deadly weapon" shall have the
meaning set forth in subdivision twelve of section 10.00 of the penal
law. In calculating the ten year period under this paragraph, any period
of time during which the defendant was incarcerated for any reason
between the time of commission of any of the prior felony offenses and
the time of commission of the crime of murder in the first degree shall
be excluded and such ten year period shall be extended by a period or
periods equal to the time served under such incarceration. The
defendant's conviction of two or more such offenses shall, if proven at
the sentencing proceeding, constitute an aggravating factor.
(b) In order to be deemed established, an aggravating factor set forth
in this subdivision must be proven by the people beyond a reasonable
doubt and the jury must unanimously find such factor to have been so
proven. The defendant may present evidence relating to an aggravating
factor defined in this subdivision and either party may offer evidence
in rebuttal. Any evidence presented by either party relating to such
factor shall be subject to the rules governing admission of evidence in
the trial of a criminal action.
(c) Whenever the people intend to offer evidence of an aggravating
factor set forth in this subdivision, the people must within a
reasonable time prior to trial file with the court and serve upon the
defendant a notice of intention to offer such evidence. Whenever the
people intend to offer evidence of the aggravating factor set forth in
paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the people shall file with the notice
of intention to offer such evidence a statement setting forth the date
and place of each of the alleged offenses in paragraph (a) of this
subdivision. The provisions of section 400.15 of this chapter, except
for subdivisions one and two thereof, shall be followed.
8. Consistent with the provisions of this section, the people and the
defendant shall be given fair opportunity to rebut any evidence received
at the separate sentencing proceeding.
9. Mitigating factors shall include the following:
(a) The defendant has no significant history of prior criminal
convictions involving the use of violence against another person;
(b) The defendant was mentally retarded at the time of the crime, or
the defendant's mental capacity was impaired or his ability to conform
his conduct to the requirements of law was impaired but not so impaired
in either case as to constitute a defense to prosecution;
(c) The defendant was under duress or under the domination of another
person, although not such duress or domination as to constitute a
defense to prosecution;
(d) The defendant was criminally liable for the present offense of
murder committed by another, but his participation in the offense was
relatively minor although not so minor as to constitute a defense to
prosecution;
(e) The murder was committed while the defendant was mentally or
emotionally disturbed or under the influence of alcohol or any drug,
although not to such an extent as to constitute a defense to
prosecution; or
(f) Any other circumstance concerning the crime, the defendant's state
of mind or condition at the time of the crime, or the defendant's
character, background or record that would be relevant to mitigation or
punishment for the crime.
* 10. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the people and the
defendant may present argument in summation for or against the sentence
sought by the people. The people may deliver the first summation and the
defendant may then deliver the last summation. Thereafter, the court
shall deliver a charge to the jury on any matters appropriate in the
circumstances. In its charge, the court must instruct the jury that with
respect to each count of murder in the first degree the jury should
consider whether or not a sentence of death should be imposed and
whether or not a sentence of life imprisonment without parole should be
imposed, and that the jury must be unanimous with respect to either
sentence. The court must also instruct the jury that in the event the
jury fails to reach unanimous agreement with respect to the sentence,
the court will sentence the defendant to a term of imprisonment with a
minimum term of between twenty and twenty-five years and a maximum term
of life. Following the court's charge, the jury shall retire to consider
the sentence to be imposed. Unless inconsistent with the provisions of
this section, the provisions of sections 310.10, 310.20 and 310.30 shall
govern the deliberations of the jury.
* NB The jury deadlock instruction prescribed in sub 10 declared
UNCONSTITUTIONAL under Article 1, Section 6 of the state Constitution
11. (a) The jury may not direct imposition of a sentence of death
unless it unanimously finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the
aggravating factor or factors substantially outweigh the mitigating
factor or factors established, if any, and unanimously determines that
the penalty of death should be imposed. Any member or members of the
jury who find a mitigating factor to have been proven by the defendant
by a preponderance of the evidence may consider such factor established
regardless of the number of jurors who concur that the factor has been
established.
(b) If the jury directs imposition of either a sentence of death or
life imprisonment without parole, it shall specify on the record those
mitigating and aggravating factors considered and those mitigating
factors established by the defendant, if any.
(c) With respect to a count or concurrent counts of murder in the
first degree, the court may direct the jury to cease deliberation with
respect to the sentence or sentences to be imposed if the jury has
deliberated for an extensive period of time without reaching unanimous
agreement on the sentence or sentences to be imposed and the court is
satisfied that any such agreement is unlikely within a reasonable time.
The provisions of this paragraph shall apply with respect to consecutive
counts of murder in the first degree. In the event the jury is unable to
reach unanimous agreement, the court must sentence the defendant in
accordance with subdivisions one through three of section 70.00 of the
penal law with respect to any count or counts of murder in the first
degree upon which the jury failed to reach unanimous agreement as to the
sentence to be imposed.
(d) If the jury unanimously determines that a sentence of death should
be imposed, the court must thereupon impose a sentence of death.
Thereafter, however, the court may, upon written motion of the
defendant, set aside the sentence of death upon any of the grounds set
forth in section 330.30. The procedures set forth in sections 330.40 and
330.50, as applied to separate sentencing proceedings under this
section, shall govern the motion and the court upon granting the motion
shall, except as may otherwise be required by subdivision one of section
330.50, direct a new sentencing proceeding pursuant to this section.
Upon granting the motion upon any of the grounds set forth in section
330.30 and setting aside the sentence, the court must afford the people
a reasonable period of time, which shall not be less than ten days, to
determine whether to take an appeal from the order setting aside the
sentence of death. The taking of an appeal by the people stays the
effectiveness of that portion of the court's order that directs a new
sentencing proceeding.
(e) If the jury unanimously determines that a sentence of life
imprisonment without parole should be imposed the court must thereupon
impose a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
(f) Where a sentence has been unanimously determined by the jury it
must be recorded on the minutes and read to the jury, and the jurors
must be collectively asked whether such is their sentence. Even though
no juror makes any declaration in the negative, the jury must, if either
party makes such an application, be polled and each juror separately
asked whether the sentence announced by the foreman is in all respects
his or her sentence. If, upon either the collective or the separate
inquiry, any juror answers in the negative, the court must refuse to
accept the sentence and must direct the jury to resume its deliberation.
If no disagreement is expressed, the jury must be discharged from the
case.
12. (a) Upon the conviction of a defendant for the offense of murder
in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal law, the
court shall, upon oral or written motion of the defendant based upon a
showing that there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant is
mentally retarded, promptly conduct a hearing without a jury to
determine whether the defendant is mentally retarded. Upon the consent
of both parties, such a hearing, or a portion thereof, may be conducted
by the court contemporaneously with the separate sentencing proceeding
in the presence of the sentencing jury, which in no event shall be the
trier of fact with respect to the hearing. At such hearing the defendant
has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence that he or
she is mentally retarded. The court shall defer rendering any finding
pursuant to this subdivision as to whether the defendant is mentally
retarded until a sentence is imposed pursuant to this section.
(b) In the event the defendant is sentenced pursuant to this section
to life imprisonment without parole or to a term of imprisonment for the
class A-I felony of murder in the first degree other than a sentence of
life imprisonment without parole, the court shall not render a finding
with respect to whether the defendant is mentally retarded.
(c) In the event the defendant is sentenced pursuant to this section
to death, the court shall thereupon render a finding with respect to
whether the defendant is mentally retarded. If the court finds the
defendant is mentally retarded, the court shall set aside the sentence
of death and sentence the defendant either to life imprisonment without
parole or to a term of imprisonment for the class A-I felony of murder
in the first degree other than a sentence of life imprisonment without
parole. If the court finds the defendant is not mentally retarded, then
such sentence of death shall not be set aside pursuant to this
subdivision.
(d) In the event that a defendant is convicted of murder in the first
degree pursuant to subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision
one of section 125.27 of the penal law, and the killing occurred while
the defendant was confined or under custody in a state correctional
facility or local correctional institution, and a sentence of death is
imposed, such sentence may not be set aside pursuant to this subdivision
upon the ground that the defendant is mentally retarded. Nothing in this
paragraph or paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall preclude a
defendant from presenting mitigating evidence of mental retardation at
the separate sentencing proceeding.
(e) The foregoing provisions of this subdivision notwithstanding, at a
reasonable time prior to the commencement of trial the defendant may,
upon a written motion alleging reasonable cause to believe the defendant
is mentally retarded, apply for an order directing that a mental
retardation hearing be conducted prior to trial. If, upon review of the
defendant's motion and any response thereto, the court finds reasonable
cause to believe the defendant is mentally retarded, it shall promptly
conduct a hearing without a jury to determine whether the defendant is
mentally retarded. In the event the court finds after the hearing that
the defendant is not mentally retarded, the court must, prior to
commencement of trial, enter an order so stating, but nothing in this
paragraph shall preclude a defendant from presenting mitigating evidence
of mental retardation at a separate sentencing proceeding. In the event
the court finds after the hearing that the defendant, based upon a
preponderance of the evidence, is mentally retarded, the court must,
prior to commencement of trial, enter an order so stating. Unless the
order is reversed on an appeal by the people or unless the provisions of
paragraph (d) of this subdivision apply, a separate sentencing
proceeding under this section shall not be conducted if the defendant is
thereafter convicted of murder in the first degree. In the event a
separate sentencing proceeding is not conducted, the court, upon
conviction of a defendant for the crime of murder in the first degree,
shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment without parole or to a
sentence of imprisonment for the class A-I felony of murder in the first
degree other than a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
Whenever a mental retardation hearing is held and a finding is rendered
pursuant to this paragraph, the court may not conduct a hearing pursuant
to paragraph (a) of this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision
and paragraph (b) of subdivision nine of this section, "mental
retardation" means significantly subaverage general intellectual
functioning existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior
which were manifested before the age of eighteen.
(f) In the event the court enters an order pursuant to paragraph (e)
of this subdivision finding that the defendant is mentally retarded, the
people may appeal as of right from the order pursuant to subdivision ten
of section 450.20 of this chapter. Upon entering such an order the court
must afford the people a reasonable period of time, which shall not be
less than ten days, to determine whether to take an appeal from the
order finding that the defendant is mentally retarded. The taking of an
appeal by the people stays the effectiveness of the court's order and
any order fixing a date for trial. Within six months of the effective
date of this subdivision, the court of appeals shall adopt rules to
ensure that appeals pursuant to this paragraph are expeditiously
perfected, reviewed and determined so that pretrial delays are
minimized. Prior to adoption of the rules, the court of appeals shall
issue proposed rules and receive written comments thereon from
interested parties.
13. (a) As used in this subdivision, the term "psychiatric evidence"
means evidence of mental disease, defect or condition in connection with
either a mitigating factor defined in this section or a mental
retardation hearing pursuant to this section to be offered by a
psychiatrist, psychologist or other person who has received training, or
education, or has experience relating to the identification, diagnosis,
treatment or evaluation of mental disease, mental defect or mental
condition.
(b) When either party intends to offer psychiatric evidence, the party
must, within a reasonable time prior to trial, serve upon the other
party and file with the court a written notice of intention to present
psychiatric evidence. The notice shall include a brief but detailed
statement specifying the witness, nature and type of psychiatric
evidence sought to be introduced. If either party fails to serve and
file written notice, no psychiatric evidence is admissible unless the
party failing to file thereafter serves and files such notice and the
court affords the other party an adjournment for a reasonable period. If
a party fails to give timely notice, the court in its discretion may
impose upon offending counsel a reasonable monetary sanction for an
intentional failure but may not in any event preclude the psychiatric
evidence. In the event a monetary sanction is imposed, the offending
counsel shall be personally liable therefor, and shall not receive
reimbursement of any kind from any source in order to pay the cost of
such monetary sanction. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the
court from entering an order directing a party to provide timely notice.
(c) When a defendant serves notice pursuant to this subdivision, the
district attorney may make application, upon notice to the defendant,
for an order directing that the defendant submit to an examination by a
psychiatrist, licensed psychologist, or licensed clinical social worker
designated by the district attorney, for the purpose of rebutting
evidence offered by the defendant with respect to a mental disease,
defect, or condition in connection with either a mitigating factor
defined in this section, including whether the defendant was acting
under duress, was mentally or emotionally disturbed or mentally
retarded, or was under the influence of alcohol or any drug. If the
application is granted, the district attorney shall schedule a time and
place for the examination, which shall be recorded. Counsel for the
people and the defendant shall have the right to be present at the
examination. A transcript of the examination shall be made available to
the defendant and the district attorney promptly after its conclusion.
The district attorney shall promptly serve on the defendant a written
copy of the findings and evaluation of the examiner. If the court finds
that the defendant has wilfully refused to cooperate fully in an
examination pursuant to this paragraph, it shall, upon request of the
district attorney, instruct the jury that the defendant did not submit
to or cooperate fully in such psychiatric examination. When a defendant
is subjected to an examination pursuant to an order issued in accordance
with this subdivision, any statement made by the defendant for the
purpose of the examination shall be inadmissible in evidence against him
in any criminal action or proceeding on any issue other than that of
whether a mitigating factor has been established or whether the
defendant is mentally retarded, but such statement is admissible upon
such an issue whether or not it would otherwise be deemed a privileged
communication.
14. (a) At a reasonable time prior to the sentencing proceeding or a
mental retardation hearing:
(i) the prosecutor shall, unless previously disclosed and subject to a
protective order, make available to the defendant the statements and
information specified in subdivision one of section 245.20 of this part
and make available for inspection, photographing, copying or testing the
property specified in subdivision one of section 245.20; and
(ii) the defendant shall, unless previously disclosed and subject to a
protective order, make available to the prosecution the statements and
information specified in subdivision four of section 245.20 and make
available for inspection, photographing, copying or testing, subject to
constitutional limitations, the reports, documents and other property
specified in section 245.20 of this part.
(b) Where a party refuses to make disclosure pursuant to this section,
the provisions of section 245.70, 245.75 and/or 245.80 of this part
shall apply.
(c) If, after complying with the provisions of this section or an
order pursuant thereto, a party finds either before or during a
sentencing proceeding or mental retardation hearing, additional material
subject to discovery or covered by court order, the party shall promptly
make disclosure or apply for a protective order.
(d) If the court finds that a party has failed to comply with any of
the provisions of this section, the court may employ any of the remedies
or sanctions specified in subdivision one of section 245.80 of this
part.
15. The court of appeals shall formulate and adopt rules for the
development of forms for use by the jury in recording its findings and
determinations of sentence.
Procedure for determining the amount of a fine based upon the
defendant's gain from the offense.
1. Order directing a hearing. In any case where the court is of the
opinion that the sentence should consist of or include a fine and that,
pursuant to article eighty of the penal law, the amount of the fine
should be based upon the defendant's gain from the commission of the
offense, the court may order a hearing to determine the amount of such
gain. The order must be filed with the clerk of the court and must
specify a date for the hearing not less than ten days after the filing
of the order.
2. Notice of hearing. Upon receipt of the order, the clerk of the
court must send a notice of the hearing to the defendant, his counsel
and the district attorney. Such notice must specify the time and place
of the hearing and the fact that the purpose thereof is to determine the
amount of the defendant's gain from the commission of the offense so
that an appropriate fine can be imposed.
3. Hearing. When the defendant appears for the hearing the court
must ask him whether he wishes to make any statement with respect to the
amount of his gain from the commission of the offense. If the defendant
does make a statement, the court may accept such statement and base its
finding thereon. Where the defendant does not make a statement, or
where the court does not accept the defendant's statement, it may
proceed with the hearing.
4. Burden and standard of proof; evidence. At any hearing held
pursuant to this section the burden of proof rests upon the people. A
finding as to the amount of the defendant's gain from the commission of
the offense must be based upon a preponderance of the evidence. Any
relevant evidence, not legally privileged, may be received regardless of
its admissibility under the exclusionary rules of evidence.
5. Termination of hearing. At any time during the pendency of a
hearing pursuant to this section the court may, in its discretion,
terminate the hearing without making any finding.
Procedure for determining prior convictions for the purpose of
sentence in certain cases.
1. Applicability. Where a conviction is entered for an unclassified
misdemeanor or for a traffic infraction and the authorized sentence
depends upon whether the defendant has a previous judgment of conviction
for an offense, or where a conviction is entered for a violation defined
outside the penal law and the amount of the fine authorized by the law
defining such violation depends upon whether the defendant has a
previous judgment of conviction for an offense, such issue is determined
as provided in this section.
2. Statement to be filed. If it appears that the defendant has a
previous judgment of conviction and if the court is required, or in its
discretion desires, to impose a sentence that would not be authorized in
the absence of such previous judgment, a statement must be filed after
conviction and before sentence setting forth the date and place of the
previous judgment or judgments and the court must conduct a hearing to
determine whether the defendant is the same person mentioned in the
record of such judgment or judgments. In any case where an increased
sentence is mandatory, the statement may be filed by the court or by the
prosecutor. In any case where an increased sentence is discretionary,
the statement may be filed only by the court.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of
such statement and the court must ask him whether he admits or denies
such prior judgment or judgments. If the defendant denies the same or
remains mute, the court may proceed with the hearing and, where the
increased sentence is mandatory, it must impose such.
4. Time for hearing. In any case where a copy of the statement was
not received by the defendant at least two days prior to the preliminary
examination, the court must upon request of the defendant grant an
adjournment of at least two days before proceeding with the hearing.
5. Manner of conducting hearing. A hearing pursuant to this section
must be before the court without a jury. The burden of proof is upon
the people and a finding that the defendant has been convicted of any
offense alleged in the statement must be based upon proof beyond a
reasonable doubt by evidence admissible under the rules applicable to
trial of the issue of guilt.
ARTICLE 410 Sentences of Probation, Conditional Discharge and Parole Supervision
Specification of conditions of the sentence.
1. When the court pronounces a sentence of probation or of conditional
discharge it must specify as part of the sentence the conditions to be
complied with. Where the sentence is one of probation, the defendant
must be given a written copy of the conditions at the time sentence is
imposed. In any case where the defendant is given a written copy of the
conditions, a copy thereof must be filed with and become part of the
record of the case, and it is not necessary to specify the conditions
orally.
2. Commission of an additional offense, other than a traffic
infraction, after imposition of a sentence of probation or of
conditional discharge, and prior to expiration or termination of the
period of the sentence, constitutes a ground for revocation of such
sentence irrespective of whether such fact is specified as a condition
of the sentence.
3. When the court pronounces a sentence of probation or conditional
discharge for a specified crime defined in paragraph (e) of subdivision
one of section six hundred thirty-two-a of the executive law, in
addition to specifying the conditions of the sentence, the court shall
provide written notice to such defendant concerning any requirement to
report to the office of victim services funds of a convicted person as
defined in section six hundred thirty-two-a of the executive law, the
procedures for such reporting and any potential penalty for a failure to
comply.
4. When the court pronounces a sentence of probation or conditional
discharge, the court shall provide that the performance of bona fide
work for an employer, including travel time to and from bona fide work,
regardless if such work or related travel time is performed during
curfew times set by conditions of probation, parole, presumptive
release, conditional release, release to post-release supervision or any
other type of supervised release, shall not be considered a violation of
such sentence of probation or conditional discharge. For purposes of
this section, bona fide work is work performed as an employee for an
employer, as defined in section two of the labor law.
Modification or enlargement of conditions.
1. The court may modify or enlarge the conditions of a sentence of
probation or of conditional discharge at any time prior to the
expiration or termination of the period of the sentence. Such action
may not, however, be taken unless the defendant is personally present,
except that the defendant need not be present if the modification
consists solely of the elimination or relaxation of one or more
conditions. Whenever the defendant has not been present, the court
shall notify the defendant in writing within twenty days of such
modification specifying the nature of the elimination or relaxation of
such condition or conditions and the effective date thereof. In any
such case the modification or enlargement may be specified in the same
manner as the conditions originally imposed and becomes part of the
sentence.
2. The procedure set forth in this section applies to the imposition
of an additional period of conditional discharge as authorized by
subdivision three of section 65.05 of the penal law.
Declaration of delinquency.
If at any time during the period of a sentence of probation or of
conditional discharge the court has reasonable cause to believe that the
defendant has violated a condition of the sentence, it may declare the
defendant delinquent and file a written declaration of delinquency. When
the court receives a request for a declaration of delinquency by a
probation officer, it shall make a decision on such request within
seventy-two hours of its receipt of the request. Upon filing a written
declaration of delinquency, the court must promptly take reasonable and
appropriate action to cause the defendant to appear before it for the
purpose of enabling the court to make a final determination with respect
to the alleged delinquency in accordance with section 410.70 of this
article.
Notice to appear, warrant.
1. Notice to appear. The court may at any time order that a person who
is under a sentence of probation or of conditional discharge appear
before it. Such order may be in the form of a written notice, specifying
the time and place of appearance, mailed to or served personally upon
the defendant as the court may direct. In the absence of a warrant
issued pursuant to subdivision two of this section, where a probation
officer has submitted a violation petition and report, the court shall
promptly consider such petition and, where the court issues a notice to
appear, the court shall direct that the defendant appear within ten
business days of the court's order. When the order is in the form of
such a notice, failure to appear as ordered without reasonable cause
therefor constitutes a violation of the conditions of the sentence
irrespective of whether such requirement is specified as a condition
thereof.
2. Warrant. (a) Where the probation officer has requested that a
probation warrant be issued, the court shall, within seventy-two hours
of its receipt of the request, issue or deny the warrant or take any
other lawful action including issuance of a notice to appear pursuant to
subdivision one of this section. If at any time during the period of a
sentence of probation or of conditional discharge the court has
reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant has violated a
condition of the sentence, the court may issue a warrant to a police
officer or to an appropriate peace officer directing him or her to take
the defendant into custody and bring the defendant before the court
without unnecessary delay; provided, however, if the court in which the
warrant is returnable is a superior court, and such court is not
available, and the warrant is addressed to a police officer or
appropriate probation officer certified as a peace officer, such
executing officer may unless otherwise specified under paragraph (b) of
this subdivision, bring the defendant to the local correctional facility
of the county in which such court sits, to be detained there until not
later than the commencement of the next session of such court occurring
on the next business day; or if the court in which the warrant is
returnable is a local criminal court, and such court is not available,
and the warrant is addressed to a police officer or appropriate
probation officer certified as a peace officer, such executing officer
must without unnecessary delay bring the defendant before an alternate
local criminal court, as provided in subdivision five of section 120.90
of this chapter. A court which issues such a warrant may attach thereto
a summary of the basis for the warrant. In any case where a defendant
arrested upon the warrant is brought before a local criminal court other
than the court in which the warrant is returnable, such local criminal
court shall consider such summary before issuing a securing order with
respect to the defendant.
(b) If the court in which the warrant is returnable is a superior
court, and such court is not available, and the warrant is addressed to
a police officer or appropriate probation officer certified as a peace
officer, such executing officer shall, where a defendant is sixteen
years of age or younger who allegedly commits an offense or a violation
of his or her probation or conditional discharge imposed for an offense
on or after October first, two thousand eighteen, or where a defendant
is seventeen years of age or younger who allegedly commits an offense or
a violation of his or her probation or conditional discharge imposed for
an offense on or after October first, two thousand nineteen, bring the
defendant without unnecessary delay before the youth part, provided,
however that if the youth part is not in session, the defendant shall be
brought before the most accessible magistrate designated by the
appellate division.
Custody and supervision of probationers.
1. Custody. A person who is under a sentence of probation is in the
legal custody of the court that imposed it pending expiration or
termination of the period of the sentence.
2. Supervision. The probation department serving the court that
imposed a sentence of probation has the duty of supervising the
defendant during the period of such legal custody.
3. Search order. If at any time during the period of probation the
court has reasonable cause to believe that the defendant has violated a
condition of the sentence, it may issue a search order. Such order must
be directed to a probation officer and may authorize such officer to
search the person of the defendant and/or any premises in which he
resides or any real or personal property which he owns or which is in
his possession.
4. Taking custody without warrant. When a probation officer has
reasonable cause to believe that a person under his supervision pursuant
to a sentence of probation has violated a condition of the sentence,
such officer may, without a warrant, take the probationer into custody
and search his person.
5. Assistance by police officer. In executing a search order, or in
taking a person into custody, pursuant to this section, a probation
officer may be assisted by a police officer.
Appearance before court.
A person who has been taken into custody pursuant to section 410.40 or
section 410.50 of this article for violation of a condition of a
sentence of probation or a sentence of conditional discharge must
forthwith be brought before the court that imposed the sentence. Where a
violation of probation petition and report has been filed and the person
has not been taken into custody nor has a warrant been issued, an
initial court appearance shall occur within ten business days of the
court's issuance of a notice to appear. If the court has reasonable
cause to believe that such person has violated a condition of the
sentence, it may commit such person to the custody of the sheriff, fix
bail, release such person under non-monetary conditions or release such
person on such person's own recognizance for future appearance at a
hearing to be held in accordance with section 410.70 of this article. If
the court does not have reasonable cause to believe that such person has
violated a condition of the sentence, it must direct that such person be
released.
Hearing on violation.
1. In general. The court may not revoke a sentence of probation or a
sentence of conditional discharge, or extend a period of probation,
unless (a) the court has found that the defendant has violated a
condition of the sentence and (b) the defendant has had an opportunity
to be heard pursuant to this section. The defendant is entitled to a
hearing in accordance with this section promptly after the court has
filed a declaration of delinquency or has committed him or has fixed
bail pursuant to this article.
2. Statement; preliminary examination. The court must file or cause to
be filed with the clerk of the court a statement setting forth the
condition or conditions of the sentence violated and a reasonable
description of the time, place and manner in which the violation
occurred. The defendant must appear before the court within ten business
days of the court's issuance of the notice to appear and the court must
advise him of the contents of the statement and furnish him with a copy
thereof. At the time of such appearance the court must ask the defendant
whether he wishes to make any statement with respect to the violation.
If the defendant makes a statement, the court may accept it and base its
decision thereon. If the court does not accept it, or if the defendant
does not make a statement, the court must proceed with the hearing.
Provided, however, that upon request, the court must grant a reasonable
adjournment to the defendant to enable him to prepare for the hearing.
3. Manner of conducting hearing. The hearing must be a summary one by
the court without a jury and the court may receive any relevant evidence
not legally privileged. The defendant may cross-examine witnesses and
may present evidence on his own behalf. A finding that the defendant has
violated a condition of his sentence must be based upon a preponderance
of the evidence.
4. Counsel. The defendant is entitled to counsel at all stages of any
proceeding under this section and the court must advise him of such
right at the outset of the proceeding.
5. Revocation; modification; continuation. At the conclusion of the
hearing the court may revoke, continue or modify the sentence of
probation or conditional discharge. Where the court revokes the
sentence, it must impose sentence as specified in subdivisions three and
four of section 60.01 of the penal law. Where the court continues or
modifies the sentence, it must vacate the declaration of delinquency and
direct that the defendant be released. If the alleged violation is
sustained and the court continues or modifies the sentence, it may
extend the sentence up to the period of interruption specified in
subdivision two of section 65.15 of the penal law, but any time spent in
custody in any correctional institution pursuant to section 410.60 of
this article shall be credited against the term of the sentence.
Provided further, where the alleged violation is sustained and the court
continues or modifies the sentence, the court may also extend the
remaining period of probation up to the maximum term authorized by
section 65.00 of the penal law. Provided, however, a defendant shall
receive credit for the time during which he or she was supervised under
the original probation sentence prior to any declaration of delinquency
and for any time spent in custody pursuant to this article for an
alleged violation of probation.
Transfer of supervision of probationers.
1. Authority to transfer supervision. Where a probationer at the time
of sentencing or an interim probationer at the time of the imposition of
the period of interim probation supervision resides in another
jurisdiction within the state, the sentencing court shall transfer
supervision to the appropriate probation department in such other
jurisdiction. Where, after a probation sentence or interim probation
supervision is pronounced, a probationer or interim probationer desires
to reside in another jurisdiction within the state that is not served by
the sentencing court, such court, in its discretion, may approve a
change in residency and, upon approval, shall transfer supervision to
the appropriate probation department serving the county of the
probationer's proposed new residence. Any transfer under this
subdivision must be in accordance with rules adopted by the commissioner
of the division of criminal justice services.
2. Transfer of powers. (a) Upon completion of transfer of probation as
authorized pursuant to subdivision one, the probation department in the
receiving jurisdiction shall assume all powers and duties of the
probation department in the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. Upon
completion of transfer, the appropriate court within the jurisdiction of
the receiving probation department shall assume all powers and duties of
the sentencing court and shall have sole jurisdiction in the case
including jurisdiction over matters specified in article twenty-three of
the correction law. Further, the sentencing court shall immediately
forward its entire case record to the receiving court.
(i) In transfers involving a defendant sentenced to probation upon
conviction of a felony, the receiving court served by the probation
department to which supervision is transferred shall be the superior
court within the jurisdiction of the probation department.
(ii) In transfers involving a defendant sentenced to probation upon
conviction of a misdemeanor, the receiving court served by the probation
department to which supervision is transferred shall be the appropriate
criminal court within the jurisdiction of the probation department. The
sending probation department shall consult with the probation department
to which supervision will be transferred to determine the appropriate
criminal court to receive the case.
(b) Where a transfer is authorized for a defendant on interim
probation supervision pursuant to subdivision one of this section, the
sentencing court shall retain jurisdiction during the period of interim
probation. The probation department in the receiving jurisdiction shall
assume all powers and duties of the original probation department in the
jurisdiction of the sentencing court.
3. Interstate compact. Nothing contained in this section affects or
limits the provisions of section two hundred fifty-nine-mm of the
executive law relating to out-of-state probation supervision.
4. Federal transfer of custody and supervision. Notwithstanding the
provisions of any other law, the court served by the probation
department may consent to the transfer of custody and supervision of a
probationer to the United States Department of Justice pursuant to the
Witness Security Act of nineteen hundred eighty-four.
Termination of sentence.
1. The court may at any time terminate either a period of probation,
other than a period of lifetime probation, for conviction to a crime or
a period of conditional discharge for an offense.
2. The court may terminate a period of probation for a person who is
subject to lifetime probation and who has been on unrevoked probation
for at least five consecutive years.
3. (a) The court shall grant a request for termination of a sentence
of probation under this section when, having regard to the conduct and
condition of the probationer, the court is of the opinion that:
(i) the probationer is no longer in need of such guidance, training or
other assistance which would otherwise be administered through probation
supervision;
(ii) the probationer has diligently complied with the terms and
conditions of the sentence of probation; and
(iii) the termination of the sentence of probation is not adverse to
the protection of the public.
No such termination shall be granted unless the court is satisfied
that the probationer, who is otherwise financially able to comply with
an order of restitution or reparation, has made a good faith effort to
comply therewith.
(b) The court shall grant a request for termination of a sentence of
conditional discharge under this section when, having regard to the
conduct and condition of the defendant, the court is of the opinion
that:
(i) the defendant has diligently complied with the terms and
conditions of the sentence of conditional discharge; and
(ii) termination of the sentence of conditional discharge is not
adverse to protection of the public.
Superior court; youth part.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this article, all proceedings
relating to a juvenile offender or adolescent offender shall be heard in
the youth part of the superior court having jurisdiction and any
intrastate transfers under this article shall be between courts
designated as a youth part pursuant to article seven hundred twenty-two
of this chapter.
* § 410.91 Sentence of parole supervision.
1. A sentence of parole supervision is an indeterminate sentence of
imprisonment, or a determinate sentence of imprisonment imposed pursuant
to paragraphs (b) and (d) of subdivision three of section 70.70 of the
penal law, which may be imposed upon an eligible defendant, as defined
in subdivision two of this section. If an indeterminate sentence, such
sentence shall have a minimum term and a maximum term within the ranges
specified by subdivisions three and four of section 70.06 of the penal
law. If a determinate sentence, such sentence shall have a term within
the ranges specified by subparagraphs (iii) and (iv) of paragraph (b) of
subdivision three of section 70.70 of the penal law. Provided, however,
if the court directs that the sentence be executed as a sentence of
parole supervision, it shall remand the defendant for immediate delivery
to a reception center operated by the state department of corrections
and community supervision, in accordance with section 430.20 of this
chapter and section six hundred one of the correction law, for a period
not to exceed ten days. An individual who receives such a sentence shall
be placed under the immediate supervision of the department of
corrections and community supervision and must comply with the
conditions of parole, which shall include an initial placement in a drug
treatment campus for a period of ninety days at which time the defendant
shall be released therefrom.
2. A defendant is an "eligible defendant" for purposes of a sentence
of parole supervision when such defendant is a felony offender convicted
of a specified offense or offenses as defined in subdivision five of
this section, who stands convicted of no other felony offense, who has
not previously been convicted of either a violent felony offense as
defined in section 70.02 of the penal law, a class A felony offense or a
class B felony offense other than a class B felony offense defined in
article two hundred twenty of the penal law, and is not subject to an
undischarged term of imprisonment.
3. When an indeterminate or determinate sentence of imprisonment is
imposed upon an eligible defendant for a specified offense, as defined
in subdivision five of this section, the court may direct that such
sentence be executed as a sentence of parole supervision if the court
finds (i) that the defendant has a history of controlled substance
dependence that is a significant contributing factor to such defendant's
criminal conduct; (ii) that such defendant's controlled substance
dependence could be appropriately addressed by a sentence of parole
supervision; and (iii) that imposition of such a sentence would not have
an adverse effect on public safety or public confidence in the integrity
of the criminal justice system.
** 5. For the purposes of this section, a "specified offense" is an
offense defined by any of the following provisions of the penal law:
burglary in the third degree as defined in section 140.20, criminal
mischief in the third degree as defined in section 145.05, criminal
mischief in the second degree as defined in section 145.10, grand
larceny in the fourth degree as defined in subdivision one, two, three,
four, five, six, eight, nine or ten of section 155.30, grand larceny in
the third degree as defined in section 155.35 (except where the property
consists of one or more firearms, rifles or shotguns), unauthorized use
of a vehicle in the second degree as defined in section 165.06, criminal
possession of stolen property in the fourth degree as defined in
subdivision one, two, three, five or six of section 165.45, criminal
possession of stolen property in the third degree as defined in section
165.50 (except where the property consists of one or more firearms,
rifles or shotguns), forgery in the second degree as defined in section
170.10, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree
as defined in section 170.25, unlawfully using slugs in the first degree
as defined in section 170.60, criminal diversion of medical marihuana in
the first degree as defined in section 179.10 or an attempt to commit
any of the aforementioned offenses if such attempt constitutes a felony
offense; or a class B felony offense defined in article two hundred
twenty where a sentence is imposed pursuant to paragraph (a) of
subdivision two of section 70.70 of the penal law; or any class C, class
D or class E controlled substance or marihuana felony offense as defined
in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one.
* NB Effective until July 5, 2028
** 5. For the purposes of this section, a "specified offense" is an
offense defined by any of the following provisions of the penal law:
burglary in the third degree as defined in section 140.20, criminal
mischief in the third degree as defined in section 145.05, criminal
mischief in the second degree as defined in section 145.10, grand
larceny in the fourth degree as defined in subdivision one, two, three,
four, five, six, eight, nine or ten of section 155.30, grand larceny in
the third degree as defined in section 155.35 (except where the property
consists of one or more firearms, rifles or shotguns), unauthorized use
of a vehicle in the second degree as defined in section 165.06, criminal
possession of stolen property in the fourth degree as defined in
subdivision one, two, three, five or six of section 165.45, criminal
possession of stolen property in the third degree as defined in section
165.50 (except where the property consists of one or more firearms,
rifles or shotguns), forgery in the second degree as defined in section
170.10, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree
as defined in section 170.25, unlawfully using slugs in the first degree
as defined in section 170.60, or an attempt to commit any of the
aforementioned offenses if such attempt constitutes a felony offense; or
a class B felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty where a
sentence is imposed pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision two of
section 70.70 of the penal law; or any class C, class D or class E
controlled substance or marihuana felony offense as defined in article
two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one.
** NB Effective July 5, 2028
6. Upon delivery of the defendant to the reception center, he or she
shall be given a copy of the conditions of parole by a representative of
the department of corrections and community supervision and shall
acknowledge receipt of a copy of the conditions in writing. The
conditions shall be established in accordance with article twelve-B of
the executive law and the rules and regulations of the board of parole.
Thereafter and while the parolee is participating in the intensive drug
treatment program provided at the drug treatment campus, the department
of corrections and community supervision shall assess the parolee's
special needs and shall develop an intensive program of parole
supervision that will address the parolee's substance abuse history and
which shall include periodic urinalysis testing. Unless inappropriate,
such program shall include the provision of treatment services by a
community-based substance abuse service provider which has a contract
with the department of corrections and community supervision.
7. Upon completion of the drug treatment program at the drug treatment
campus, a parolee will be furnished with money, clothing and
transportation in a manner consistent with section one hundred
twenty-five of the correction law to permit the parolee's travel from
the drug treatment campus to the county in which the parolee's
supervision will continue.
8. If the parole officer having charge of a person sentenced to parole
supervision pursuant to this section has reasonable cause to believe
that such person has violated the conditions of his or her parole, the
procedures of subdivision three of section two hundred fifty-nine-i of
the executive law shall apply to the issuance of a warrant and the
conduct of further proceedings; provided, however, that a parole
violation warrant issued for a violation committed while the parolee is
being supervised at a drug treatment campus shall constitute authority
for the immediate placement of the parolee into a correctional facility
operated by the department of corrections and community supervision,
which to the extent practicable shall be reasonably proximate to the
place at which the violation occurred, to hold in temporary detention
pending completion of the procedures required by subdivision three of
section two hundred fifty-nine-i of the executive law.
* NB Repealed September 1, 2027
ARTICLE 420 Fines, Restitution and Reparation
Payment of fines, mandatory surcharges and fees by credit card.
When the court imposes a fine, mandatory surcharge or fee upon an
individual who stands convicted of any offense, such individual may pay
such fine, mandatory surcharge or fee by credit card or similar device.
In such event, notwithstanding any other provision of law, he or she
also may be required to pay a reasonable administrative fee. The amount
of such administrative fee and the time and manner of its payment shall
be in accordance with the system established by the chief administrator
of the courts pursuant to paragraph (j) of subdivision two of section
two hundred twelve of the judiciary law.
Collection of fines, restitution or reparation.
1. Alternative methods of payment. When the court imposes a fine upon
an individual, it shall designate the official other than the district
attorney to whom payment is to be remitted. When the court imposes
restitution or reparation and requires that the defendant pay a
designated surcharge thereon pursuant to the provisions of subdivision
eight of section 60.27 of the penal law, it shall designate the official
or organization other than the district attorney, selected pursuant to
subdivision eight of this section, to whom payment is to be remitted.
(a) The court may direct:
(i) That the defendant pay the entire amount at the time sentence is
pronounced;
(ii) That the defendant pay the entire amount at some later date; or
(iii) That the defendant pay a specified portion at designated
periodic intervals.
(b) When the court imposes both (i) a fine and (ii) restitution or
reparation and such designated surcharge upon an individual and imposes
a schedule of payments, the court shall also direct that payment of
restitution or reparation and such designated surcharge take priority
over the payment of the fine.
(c) Where the defendant is sentenced to a period of probation as well
as a fine, restitution or reparation and such designated surcharge, the
court may direct that payment of the fine, restitution or reparation and
such designated surcharge be a condition of the sentence.
(d) When a court requires that restitution or reparation and such
designated surcharge be made it must direct that notice be given to a
person or persons to whom it is to be paid of the conditions under which
it is to be remitted; the name and address of the public official or
organization to whom it is to be remitted for payment and the amount
thereof; and the availability of civil proceedings for collection under
subdivision six of this section. An official or organization designated
to receive payment under this subdivision must report to the court any
failure to comply with the order and shall cooperate with the district
attorney pursuant to his responsibilities under subdivision six of this
section.
(e) Where cash bail has been posted by the defendant as the principal
and is not forfeited or assigned, the court at its discretion may order
that bail be applied toward payment of any order of restitution or
reparation or fine. If the court so orders, the bail proceeds shall be
applied to payment first of the restitution or reparation and then of
the fine.
2. Death of victim. In the event that the individual to whom
restitution or reparation is to be made dies prior to completion of said
restitution or reparation, the remaining payments shall be made to the
estate of the deceased.
3. Imprisonment for failure to pay. Where the court imposes a fine,
restitution or reparation, the sentence may provide that if the
defendant fails to pay the fine, restitution or reparation in accordance
with the direction of the court, the defendant must be imprisoned until
the fine, restitution or reparation is satisfied. Such provision may be
added at the time sentence is pronounced or at any later date while the
fine, restitution or reparation or any part thereof remains unpaid;
provided, however, that if the provision is added at a time subsequent
to the pronouncement of sentence the defendant must be personally
present when it is added. In any case where the defendant fails to pay a
fine, restitution or reparation as directed the court may issue a
warrant directing a peace officer, acting pursuant to his special
duties, or a police officer, to take him into custody and bring him
before the court; provided, however, if the court in which the warrant
is returnable is a city, town or village court, and such court is not
available, and the warrant is addressed to a police officer, such
executing police officer must without unnecessary delay bring the
defendant before an alternate local criminal court, as provided in
subdivision five of section 120.90 of this chapter; or if the court in
which the warrant is returnable is a superior court, and such court is
not available, and the warrant is addressed to a police officer, such
executing police officer may bring the defendant to the local
correctional facility of the county in which such court sits, to be
detained there until not later than the commencement of the next session
of such court occurring on the next business day. Such warrant may also
be delegated in the same manner as a warrant pursuant to section 530.70
of this chapter. Where a sentence provides that the defendant be
imprisoned for failure to pay a fine, the court shall advise the
defendant that if he is unable to pay such fine, he has a right, at any
time, to apply to the court to be resentenced as provided in subdivision
five of this section.
4. Period of imprisonment. When the court directs that the defendant
be imprisoned until the fine, restitution or reparation be satisfied, it
must specify a maximum period of imprisonment subject to the following
limits:
(a) Where the fine, restitution or reparation is imposed for a felony,
the period may not exceed one year;
(b) Where the fine, restitution or reparation is imposed for a
misdemeanor, the period may not exceed one-third of the maximum
authorized term of imprisonment;
(c) Where the fine, restitution or reparation is imposed for a petty
offense, the period may not exceed fifteen days; and
(d) Where a sentence of imprisonment as well as a fine, restitution or
reparation is imposed, the aggregate of the period and the term of the
sentence may not exceed the maximum authorized term of imprisonment.
(e) Jail time and good behavior time shall be credited against the
full period of imprisonment, if served, as provided in section 70.30 of
the penal law for definite sentences.
5. Application for resentence. In any case where the defendant is
unable to pay a fine, restitution or reparation imposed by the court, he
may at any time apply to the court for resentence. In such case, if the
court is satisfied that the defendant is unable to pay the fine,
restitution or reparation it must:
(a) Adjust the terms of payment; or
(b) Lower the amount of the fine, restitution or reparation; or
(c) Where the sentence consists of probation or imprisonment and a
fine, restitution or reparation, revoke the portion of the sentence
imposing the fine, restitution or reparation; or
(d) Revoke the entire sentence imposed and resentence the defendant.
Upon such resentence the court may impose any sentence it originally
could have imposed, except that the amount of any fine, restitution or
reparation imposed may not be in excess of the amount the defendant is
able to pay.
In any case where the defendant applies for resentencing with respect
to any condition of the sentence relating to restitution or reparation
the court must order that notice of such application and a reasonable
opportunity to be heard be given to the person or persons given notice
pursuant to subdivision one of this section. If the court grants the
defendant's application by changing the original order for restitution
or reparation in any manner, the court must place the reasons therefor
on the record.
For the purposes of this subdivision, the court shall not determine
that the defendant is unable to pay the fine, restitution or reparation
ordered solely because of such defendant's incarceration but shall
consider all the defendant's sources of income including, but not
limited to, moneys in the possession of an incarcerated individual at
the time of his or her admission into such facility, funds earned by him
or her in a work release program as defined in subdivision four of
section one hundred fifty of the correction law, funds earned by him or
her as provided for in section one hundred eighty-seven of the
correction law and any other funds received by him or her or on his or
her behalf and deposited with the superintendent or the municipal
official of the facility where the person is confined.
6. Civil proceeding for collection. (a) A fine, restitution or
reparation imposed or directed by the court shall be imposed or directed
by a written order of the court containing the amount thereof required
to be paid by the defendant. The court's order also shall direct the
district attorney to file a certified copy of such order with the county
clerk of the county in which the court is situate except where the court
which issues such order is the supreme court in which case the order
itself shall be filed by the clerk of the court acting in his or her
capacity as the county clerk of the county in which the court is
situate. Such order shall be entered by the county clerk in the same
manner as a judgment in a civil action in accordance with subdivision
(a) of rule five thousand sixteen of the civil practice law and rules.
Even if the defendant was imprisoned for failure to pay such fine,
restitution or reparation, or has served the period of imprisonment
imposed, such order after entry thereof pursuant to this subdivision may
be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action by the
victim, as defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision four of section 60.27
of the penal law, to whom restitution or reparation was ordered to be
paid, the estate of such person or the district attorney. The entered
order shall be deemed to constitute a judgment-roll as defined in
section five thousand seventeen of the civil practice law and rules and
immediately after entry of the order, the county clerk shall docket the
entered order as a money judgment pursuant to section five thousand
eighteen of such law and rules. Wherever appropriate, the district
attorney shall file a transcript of the docket of the judgment with the
clerk of any other county of the state. Such a restitution or reparation
order, when docketed shall be a first lien upon all real property in
which the defendant thereafter acquires an interest, having preference
over all other liens, security interests, and encumbrances whatsoever,
except:
(i) a lien or interest running to the benefit of the government of the
United States or the state of New York, or any political subdivision or
public benefit corporation thereof; or
(ii) a purchase money interest in any property.
(b) The district attorney may, in his or her discretion, and must,
upon order of the court, institute proceedings to collect such fine,
restitution or reparation.
7. Undisbursed restitution payments. Where a court requires that
restitution or reparation be made by a defendant, the official or
organization to whom payments are to be remitted pursuant to subdivision
one of this section may place such payments in an interest-bearing
account. The interest accrued and any undisbursed payments shall be
designated for the payment of restitution orders that have remained
unsatisfied for the longest period of time. For the purposes of this
subdivision, the term "undisbursed restitution payments" shall mean
those payments which have been remitted by a defendant but not disbursed
to the intended beneficiary and such payment has gone unclaimed for a
period of one year and the location of the intended beneficiary cannot
be ascertained by such official or organization after using reasonable
efforts.
8. Designation of restitution agency. (a) The chief elected official
in each county, and in the city of New York the mayor, shall designate
an official or organization other than the district attorney to be
responsible for the collection and administration of restitution and
reparation payments under provisions of the penal law and this chapter.
This official or organization shall be eligible for the designated
surcharge provided for by subdivision eight of section 60.27 of the
penal law.
(b) The restitution agency, as designated by paragraph (a) of this
subdivision, shall be responsible for the collection of data on a
monthly basis regarding the numbers of restitution and reparation orders
issued, the numbers of satisfied restitution and reparation orders and
information concerning the types of crimes for which such orders were
required. A probation department designated as the restitution agency
shall then forward such information to the office of probation and
correctional alternatives within the first ten days following the end of
each month. In all other cases the restitution agency shall report to
the division of criminal justice services directly. The division of
criminal justice services shall compile and review all such information
and make recommendations to promote the use of restitution and encourage
its enforcement.
Collection of fines, restitution or reparation imposed upon
corporations.
Where a corporation is sentenced to pay a fine, restitution or
reparation, the fine, restitution or reparation must be paid at the time
sentence is imposed. If the fine, restitution or reparation is not so
paid, it may be collected in the same manner as a judgment in a civil
action, and if execution issued upon such judgment be returned
unsatisfied an action may be brought in the name of the people of the
state of New York to procure a judgment sequestering the property of the
corporation, as provided by the business corporation law. It is the
duty of the attorney general in all criminal proceedings prosecuted by
him, and, in all other proceedings, the county attorney for counties
outside the city of New York, and, in the city of New York the
corporation counsel of the city of New York, to institute proceedings to
collect such fine, restitution or reparation.
Remission of fines, restitution or reparation.
1. Applicability. The procedure specified in this section governs
remission of fines, restitution or reparation in all cases not covered
by subdivision four of section 420.10.
2. Procedure. (a) Any superior court which has imposed a fine,
restitution or reparation for any offense may, in its discretion, on
five days notice to the district attorney of the county in which such
fine, restitution or reparation was imposed and to each person otherwise
required to be given notice of restitution or reparation pursuant to
subdivision one of section 420.10, remit such fine, restitution or
reparation or any portion thereof. In case of a fine, restitution or
reparation imposed by a local criminal court for any offense, a superior
court holding a term in the county in which the fine, restitution or
reparation was imposed may, upon like notice, remit such fine,
restitution or reparation or any portion thereof.
(b) The court shall give each person given notice a reasonable
opportunity to be heard on the question of remitting an order of
restitution or reparation. If the court remits such restitution or
reparation, or any part thereof, the reasons therefor shall be placed
upon the record.
3. Restrictions. Except as provided for in subdivision two-a of
section 420.35 of this article, in no event shall a mandatory surcharge,
sex offender registration fee, DNA databank fee or crime victim
assistance fee be remitted.
Mandatory surcharge and crime victim assistance fee;
applicability to sentences mandating payment of fines.
1. The provisions of section 420.10 of this article governing the
collection of fines and the provisions of section 420.40 of this article
governing deferral of mandatory surcharges, sex offender registration
fees, DNA databank fees and financial hardship hearings and the
provisions of section 430.20 of this chapter governing the commitment of
a defendant for failure to pay a fine shall be applicable to a mandatory
surcharge, sex offender registration fee, DNA databank fee and a crime
victim assistance fee imposed pursuant to subdivision one of section
60.35 of the penal law, subdivision twenty-a of section three hundred
eighty-five of the vehicle and traffic law, subdivision nineteen-a of
section four hundred one of the vehicle and traffic law, or a mandatory
surcharge imposed pursuant to section eighteen hundred nine of the
vehicle and traffic law or section 27.12 of the parks, recreation and
historic preservation law. When the court directs that the defendant be
imprisoned until the mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee
or DNA databank fee is satisfied, it must specify a maximum period of
imprisonment not to exceed fifteen days; provided, however, a court may
not direct that a defendant be imprisoned until the mandatory surcharge,
sex offender registration fee, or DNA databank fee is satisfied or
otherwise for failure to pay the mandatory surcharge, sex offender
registration fee or DNA databank fee unless the court makes a
contemporaneous finding on the record, after according defendant notice
and an opportunity to be heard, that the payment of the mandatory
surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee upon
defendant will not work an unreasonable hardship upon him or her or his
or her immediate family.
2. Except as provided in this subdivision or subdivision two-a of this
section, under no circumstances shall the mandatory surcharge, sex
offender registration fee, DNA databank fee or the crime victim
assistance fee be waived. A court shall waive any mandatory surcharge,
DNA databank fee and crime victim assistance fee when: (i) the defendant
is convicted of prostitution under section 230.00 of the penal law; (ii)
the defendant is convicted of a violation in the event such conviction
is in lieu of a plea to or conviction for prostitution under section
230.00 of the penal law; (iii) the court finds that a defendant is a
victim of sex trafficking under section 230.34 of the penal law or a
victim of trafficking in persons under the trafficking victims
protection act (United States Code, Title 22, Chapter 78); or (iv) the
court finds that the defendant is a victim of sex trafficking of a child
under section 230.34-a of the penal law.
2-a. A court may waive any mandatory surcharge, additional surcharge,
town or village surcharge, the crime victim assistance fee, DNA databank
fee, sex offender registration fee and/or supplemental sex offender
victim fee when the court finds that the defendant was under the age of
twenty-one at the time the offense was committed and:
(a) the imposition of such surcharge or fee would work an unreasonable
hardship on the defendant, his or her immediate family, or any other
person who is dependent on such defendant for financial support; or
(b) after considering the goal of promoting successful and productive
reentry and reintegration as set forth in subdivision six of section
1.05 of the penal law, the imposition of such surcharge or fee would
adversely impact the defendant's reintegration into society; or
(c) the interests of justice.
3. It shall be the duty of a court of record or administrative
tribunal to report to the division of criminal justice services on the
disposition and collection of mandatory surcharges, sex offender
registration fees or DNA databank fees and crime victim assistance fees.
Such report shall include, for all cases, whether the surcharge, sex
offender registration fee, DNA databank fee or crime victim assistance
fee levied pursuant to subdivision one of section 60.35 of the penal law
or section eighteen hundred nine of the vehicle and traffic law has been
imposed pursuant to law, collected, or is to be collected by probation
or corrections or other officials. The form, manner and frequency of
such reports shall be determined by the commissioner of the division of
criminal justice services after consultation with the chief
administrator of the courts and the commissioner of the department of
motor vehicles.
Deferral of a mandatory surcharge; financial hardship hearings.
1. Applicability. The procedure specified in this section governs the
deferral of the obligation to pay all or part of a mandatory surcharge,
sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee imposed pursuant to
subdivision one of section 60.35 of the penal law and financial hardship
hearings relating to mandatory surcharges.
2. On an appearance date set forth in a summons issued pursuant to
subdivision three of section 60.35 of the penal law, section eighteen
hundred nine of the vehicle and traffic law or section 27.12 of the
parks, recreation and historic preservation law, a person upon whom a
mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee
was levied shall have an opportunity to present on the record credible
and verifiable information establishing that the mandatory surcharge,
sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee should be deferred, in
whole or in part, because, due to the indigence of such person the
payment of said surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA databank
fee would work an unreasonable hardship on the person or his or her
immediate family.
3. In assessing such information the superior court shall be mindful
of the mandatory nature of the surcharge, sex offender registration fee
and DNA databank fee, and the important criminal justice and victim
services sustained by such fees.
4. Where a court determines that it will defer part or all of a
mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee
imposed pursuant to subdivision one of section 60.35 of the penal law, a
statement of such finding and of the facts upon which it is based shall
be made part of the record.
5. A court which defers a person's obligation to pay a mandatory
surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA databank fee imposed
pursuant to subdivision one of section 60.35 of the penal law shall do
so in a written order. Such order shall not excuse the person from the
obligation to pay the surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA
databank fee. Rather, the court's order shall direct the filing of a
certified copy of the order with the county clerk of the county in which
the court is situate except where the court which issues such order is
the supreme court in which case the order itself shall be filed by the
clerk of the court acting in his or her capacity as the county clerk of
the county in which the court is situate. Such order shall be entered by
the county clerk in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action in
accordance with subdivision (a) of rule five thousand sixteen of the
civil practice law and rules. The order shall direct that any unpaid
balance of the mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee or DNA
databank fee may be collected in the same manner as a civil judgment.
The entered order shall be deemed to constitute a judgment-roll as
defined in section five thousand seventeen of the civil practice law and
rules and immediately after entry of the order, the county clerk shall
docket the entered order as a money judgment pursuant to section five
thousand eighteen of such law and rules.
Post-trial motion relating to certain instruments affecting
residential real property.
1. When a defendant has been convicted after a trial or pled guilty to
any crime that affects the title to, encumbrance of, or the possession
of, real property and where there is an instrument that is material to
such encumbrance, transfer or purchase of said real property, the
district attorney, the attorney general, or any law enforcement agency
may file a motion in the supreme court in the county where the property
that is the subject of the instrument is located or the prosecution
occurred on behalf of the victim to void said instrument. Such motion
must be in writing and state the county or borough, if in the city of
New York, and block, lot, street address of such property, and a
description of such property, and include a copy of the judgment of
conviction. Notice must be given to all persons who have an interest in
the property.
2. Within ten days after filing a motion pursuant to subdivision one
of this section, the agency filing the motion shall record a copy of the
notice of motion in the office of the clerk of the county in which the
property is situated. The notice shall be indexed by the clerk in the
manner prescribed by subdivision (c) of rule sixty-five hundred eleven
of the civil practice law and rules for a notice of pendency of action
and shall have the same effect as such notice.
3. The supreme court must conduct a hearing and make findings of fact
essential to the determination whether to declare the instrument
described in subdivision one of this section void ab initio. There will
be a rebuttable presumption that where a party is convicted after a
trial or a guilty plea to any crime that affects the title to,
encumbrance of, or the possession of, real property and where there is
an instrument that encumbers or is material to the transfer or sale of
real property, that such instrument is void ab initio.
4. Upon the defendant's conviction of or guilty plea as described in
subdivision one of this section, and after conducting a hearing pursuant
to subdivision three of this section, a court shall make a determination
and if appropriate shall order that the instrument described in
subdivision one of this section be declared void ab initio or grant
other appropriate relief to the victim. The order of the court shall
describe the nature of the false statement or false information
contained in such instrument. A copy of such instrument shall be
attached to the order of the court.
5. If the order relates to an instrument that has been filed with,
registered, or recorded in a public office, a certified copy of such
order shall be recorded in the office of the recording officer of the
county in which such property is situated.
6. For purposes of this section, "all persons who have an interest in
the property affected by such instrument" shall mean all parties who
have recorded an instrument affecting the real property that is the
subject of the instrument described in subdivision one of this section,
any last record owner and anyone in residence during the pendency of the
prosecution and any party with a lien against the property that is
unsatisfied, or any other party that may claim to have liens or an
interest in the property, and any current residents of the property, as
of the date of the filing of the criminal information or indictment.
7. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to inhibit or prevent (a)
relief otherwise provided by law, or (b) a party's right to appeal such
order.
ARTICLE 430 Sentences of Imprisonment
Sentence of imprisonment not to be changed after commencement.
Except as otherwise specifically authorized by law, when the court has
imposed a sentence of imprisonment and such sentence is in accordance
with law, such sentence may not be changed, suspended or interrupted
once the term or period of the sentence has commenced.
Commitment of defendant.
1. In general. When a sentence of imprisonment is pronounced, or when
th sentence consists of a fine and the court has directed that the
defendant be imprisoned until it is satisfied, the defendant must
forthwith be committed to the custody of the appropriate public servant
and detained until the sentence is complied with.
* 2. Indeterminate and determinate sentences. In the case of an
indeterminate or determinate sentence of imprisonment, commitment must
be to the custody of the state department of corrections and community
supervision as provided in subdivision one of section 70.20 of the penal
law. The order of commitment must direct that the defendant be delivered
to an institution designated by the commissioner of corrections and
community supervision in accordance with the provisions of the
correction law.
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* 2. Indeterminate sentences. In the case of an indeterminate sentence
of imprisonment, commitment must be to the custody of the state
department of corrections and community supervision as provided in
subdivision one of section 70.20 of the penal law. The order of
commitment must direct that the defendant be delivered to an institution
designated by the commissioner of corrections and community supervision
in accordance with the provisions of the correction law.
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
3. Definite and intermittent sentences. In the case of a definite or
intermittent sentence of imprisonment, commitment must be as follows:
(a) In counties contained within New York City or in any county that
has a county department of correction, commitment must be to the custody
of the department of correction of such city or county;
(b) In any other case, commitment must be to the county jail,
workhouse or penitentiary, or to a penitentiary outside the county and
the order of commitment must specify the institution to which the
defendant is to be delivered.
* 4. Certain resentences. When a sentence of imprisonment that has
been imposed on a defendant is vacated and a new sentence is imposed on
such defendant for the same offense, or for an offense based upon the
same act, if the term of the new definite or determinate sentence or the
maximum term of the new indeterminate sentence so imposed is less than
or equal to that of the vacated sentence:
(a) where the time served by the defendant on the vacated sentence is
equal to or greater than the term or maximum term of the new sentence,
the new sentence shall be deemed to be served in its entirety and the
defendant shall not be committed to a correctional facility pursuant to
said sentence; and
(b) where the defendant was under the supervision of a local
conditional release commission or the department of corrections and
community supervision at the time the sentence was vacated, then the
commitment shall direct that said conditional release or parole be
recommenced, and the defendant shall not be committed to a correctional
facility pursuant to said sentence, except as a result of revocation of
parole or of conditional release; and
(c) where the defendant was not under the supervision of the
department of corrections and community supervision at the time the
indeterminate or determinate sentence was vacated, but would immediately
be eligible for conditional release from the new indeterminate or
determinate sentence, the court shall ascertain from the department of
corrections and community supervision whether the defendant has earned a
sufficient amount of good time under the vacated sentence so as to
require the conditional release of the defendant under the new sentence;
in the event the defendant has earned a sufficient amount of good time,
the court shall stay execution of sentence until the defendant
surrenders at a correctional facility pursuant to the direction of the
department of corrections and community supervision, which shall occur
no later than sixty days after imposition of sentence; upon said stay of
execution, the court clerk shall immediately mail to the commissioner of
corrections and community supervision a certified copy of the commitment
reflecting said stay of execution and the name, mailing address and
telephone number of the defendant's legal representative; in the event
the defendant fails to surrender as directed by the department of
corrections and community supervision, the department shall notify the
court which shall thereafter remand the defendant to custody pursuant to
section 430.30 of this article; and
(d) upon the resentence of a defendant as described in this
subdivision, the court clerk shall immediately mail a certified copy of
the commitment to the commissioner of corrections and community
supervision if the vacated sentence or the new sentence is an
indeterminate or determinate sentence and no mailing is required by
paragraph (c) of this subdivision; additionally, the court clerk shall
immediately mail a certified copy of the new commitment to the head of
the appropriate local correctional facility if the vacated sentence or
the new sentence is a definite sentence.
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* 4. Certain resentences. When a sentence of imprisonment that has
been imposed on a defendant is vacated and a new sentence is imposed on
such defendant for the same offense, or for an offense based upon the
same act, if the term of the new definite sentence or the maximum term
of the new indeterminate sentence so imposed is less than or equal to
that of the vacated sentence:
(a) where the time served by the defendant on the vacated sentence is
equal to or greater than the term or maximum term of the new sentence,
the new sentence shall be deemed to be served in its entirety and the
defendant shall not be committed to a correctional facility pursuant to
said sentence; and
(b) where the defendant was under the supervision of a local
conditional release commission or the department of corrections and
community supervision at the time the sentence was vacated, then the
commitment shall direct that said conditional release or parole be
recommenced, and the defendant shall not be committed to a correctional
facility pursuant to said sentence, except as a result of revocation of
parole or of conditional release; and
(c) where the defendant was not under the supervision of the
department of corrections and community supervision at the time the
indeterminate sentence was vacated, but would immediately be eligible
for conditional release from the new indeterminate sentence, the court
shall ascertain from the department of corrections and community
supervision whether the defendant has earned a sufficient amount of good
time under the vacated sentence so as to require the conditional release
of the defendant under the new sentence; in the event the defendant has
earned a sufficient amount of good time, the court shall stay execution
of sentence until the defendant surrenders at a correctional facility
pursuant to the direction of the department of corrections and community
supervision, which shall occur no later than sixty days after imposition
of sentence; upon said stay of execution, the court clerk shall
immediately mail to the commissioner of corrections and community
supervision a certified copy of the commitment reflecting said stay of
execution and the name, mailing address and telephone number of the
defendant's legal representative; in the event the defendant fails to
surrender as directed by the department of corrections and community
supervision, the department shall notify the court which shall
thereafter remand the defendant to custody pursuant to section 430.30 of
this article; and
(d) upon the resentence of a defendant as described in this
subdivision, the court clerk shall immediately mail a certified copy of
the commitment to the commissioner of corrections and community
supervision if the vacated sentence or the new sentence is an
indeterminate sentence and no mailing is required by paragraph (c) of
this subdivision; additionally, the court clerk shall immediately mail a
certified copy of the new commitment to the head of the appropriate
local correctional facility if the vacated sentence or the new sentence
is a definite sentence.
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
5. Commitment for failure to pay fine. Where the sentence consists of
a fine and the court has directed that the defendant be imprisoned until
it is satisfied, commitment must be as follows:
(a) If the sentence also includes a term of imprisonment, commitment
must be to the same institution as is designated for service of the term
of imprisonment, and the period of commitment commences (i) when the
term of imprisonment is satisfied, or (ii) with the approval of the
state board of parole, when the defendant becomes eligible for parole,
or (iii) when the defendant becomes eligible for conditional release,
whichever occurs first; provided, however, that the court may direct
that the period of imprisonment for the fine run concurrently with the
term of imprisonment; and
(b) In any other case, commitment must be to the agency or institution
that would be designated in the case of a definite sentence.
Duty to deliver defendant.
In counties contained within New York City and in counties that have a
commissioner of correction who is responsible for detention of
defendants in criminal actions, it is the duty of the commissioner of
correction of such city or county to deliver the defendant forthwith to
the proper institution in accordance with the commitment. In all other
counties it is the duty of the sheriff to deliver the defendant
forthwith to the proper institution in accordance with the commitment.
TITLE M Proceedings After Judgment
ARTICLE 440 Post-judgment Motions
Motion to vacate judgment.
1. At any time after the entry of a judgment, the court in which it
was entered may, upon motion of the defendant, vacate such judgment upon
the ground that:
(a) The court did not have jurisdiction of the action or of the person
of the defendant; or
(b) The judgment was procured by duress, misrepresentation or fraud on
the part of the court or a prosecutor or a person acting for or in
behalf of a court or a prosecutor; or
(c) Material evidence adduced at a trial resulting in the judgment was
false and was, prior to the entry of the judgment, known by the
prosecutor or by the court to be false; or
(d) Material evidence adduced by the people at a trial resulting in
the judgment was procured in violation of the defendant's rights under
the constitution of this state or of the United States; or
(e) During the proceedings resulting in the judgment, the defendant,
by reason of mental disease or defect, was incapable of understanding or
participating in such proceedings; or
(f) Improper and prejudicial conduct not appearing in the record
occurred during a trial resulting in the judgment which conduct, if it
had appeared in the record, would have required a reversal of the
judgment upon an appeal therefrom; or
(g) New evidence has been discovered since the entry of a judgment
based upon a verdict of guilty after trial, which could not have been
produced by the defendant at the trial even with due diligence on his
part and which is of such character as to create a probability that had
such evidence been received at the trial the verdict would have been
more favorable to the defendant; provided that a motion based upon such
ground must be made with due diligence after the discovery of such
alleged new evidence; or
(g-1) Forensic DNA testing of evidence performed since the entry of a
judgment, (1) in the case of a defendant convicted after a guilty plea,
the court has determined that the defendant has demonstrated a
substantial probability that the defendant was actually innocent of the
offense of which he or she was convicted, or (2) in the case of a
defendant convicted after a trial, the court has determined that there
exists a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more
favorable to the defendant.
(h) The judgment was obtained in violation of a right of the defendant
under the constitution of this state or of the United States; or
(i) The judgment is a conviction where the defendant's participation
in the offense was a result of having been a victim of sex trafficking
under section 230.34 of the penal law, sex trafficking of a child under
section 230.34-a of the penal law, labor trafficking under section
135.35 of the penal law, aggravated labor trafficking under section
135.37 of the penal law, compelling prostitution under section 230.33 of
the penal law, or trafficking in persons under the Trafficking Victims
Protection Act (United States Code, title 22, chapter 78); provided that
(i) official documentation of the defendant's status as a victim of
sex trafficking, labor trafficking, aggravated labor trafficking,
compelling prostitution, or trafficking in persons at the time of the
offense from a federal, state or local government agency shall create a
presumption that the defendant's participation in the offense was a
result of having been a victim of sex trafficking, labor trafficking,
aggravated labor trafficking, compelling prostitution or trafficking in
persons, but shall not be required for granting a motion under this
paragraph;
(ii) a motion under this paragraph, and all pertinent papers and
documents, shall be confidential and may not be made available to any
person or public or private entity except where specifically authorized
by the court; and
(iii) when a motion is filed under this paragraph, the court may, upon
the consent of the petitioner and all of the state and local
prosecutorial agencies that prosecuted each matter, consolidate into one
proceeding a motion to vacate judgments imposed by distinct or multiple
criminal courts; or
(j) The judgment is a conviction for a class A or unclassified
misdemeanor entered prior to the effective date of this paragraph and
satisfies the ground prescribed in paragraph (h) of this subdivision.
There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a conviction by plea to
such an offense was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent, based on
ongoing collateral consequences, including potential or actual
immigration consequences, and there shall be a rebuttable presumption
that a conviction by verdict constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
under section five of article one of the state constitution based on
such consequences; or
(k) The judgment occurred prior to the effective date of the laws of
two thousand twenty-one that amended this paragraph and is a conviction
for an offense as defined in subparagraphs (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of
paragraph (k) of subdivision three of section 160.50 of this part, in
which case the court shall presume that a conviction by plea for the
aforementioned offenses was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent if it
has severe or ongoing consequences, including but not limited to
potential or actual immigration consequences, and shall presume that a
conviction by verdict for the aforementioned offenses constitutes cruel
and unusual punishment under section five of article one of the state
constitution, based on those consequences. The people may rebut these
presumptions.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court must
deny a motion to vacate a judgment when:
(a) The ground or issue raised upon the motion was previously
determined on the merits upon an appeal from the judgment, unless since
the time of such appellate determination there has been a retroactively
effective change in the law controlling such issue; or
(b) The judgment is, at the time of the motion, appealable or pending
on appeal, and sufficient facts appear on the record with respect to the
ground or issue raised upon the motion to permit adequate review thereof
upon such an appeal unless the issue raised upon such motion is
ineffective assistance of counsel. This paragraph shall not apply to a
motion under paragraph (i) of subdivision one of this section; or
(c) Although sufficient facts appear on the record of the proceedings
underlying the judgment to have permitted, upon appeal from such
judgment, adequate review of the ground or issue raised upon the motion,
no such appellate review or determination occurred owing to the
defendant's unjustifiable failure to take or perfect an appeal during
the prescribed period or to his or her unjustifiable failure to raise
such ground or issue upon an appeal actually perfected by him or her
unless the issue raised upon such motion is ineffective assistance of
counsel; or
(d) The ground or issue raised relates solely to the validity of the
sentence and not to the validity of the conviction.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court may
deny a motion to vacate a judgment when:
(a) Although facts in support of the ground or issue raised upon the
motion could with due diligence by the defendant have readily been made
to appear on the record in a manner providing adequate basis for review
of such ground or issue upon an appeal from the judgment, the defendant
unjustifiably failed to adduce such matter prior to sentence and the
ground or issue in question was not subsequently determined upon appeal.
This paragraph does not apply to a motion based upon deprivation of the
right to counsel at the trial or upon failure of the trial court to
advise the defendant of such right, or to a motion under paragraph (i)
of subdivision one of this section; or
(b) The ground or issue raised upon the motion was previously
determined on the merits upon a prior motion or proceeding in a court of
this state, other than an appeal from the judgment, or upon a motion or
proceeding in a federal court; unless since the time of such
determination there has been a retroactively effective change in the law
controlling such issue; or
(c) Upon a previous motion made pursuant to this section, the
defendant was in a position adequately to raise the ground or issue
underlying the present motion but did not do so.
Although the court may deny the motion under any of the circumstances
specified in this subdivision, in the interest of justice and for good
cause shown it may in its discretion grant the motion if it is otherwise
meritorious and vacate the judgment.
4. If the court grants the motion, it must, except as provided in
subdivision five or six of this section, vacate the judgment, and must
dismiss the accusatory instrument, or order a new trial, or take such
other action as is appropriate in the circumstances.
5. Upon granting the motion upon the ground, as prescribed in
paragraph (g) of subdivision one, that newly discovered evidence creates
a probability that had such evidence been received at the trial the
verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant in that the
conviction would have been for a lesser offense than the one contained
in the verdict, the court may either:
(a) Vacate the judgment and order a new trial; or
(b) With the consent of the people, modify the judgment by reducing it
to one of conviction for such lesser offense. In such case, the court
must re-sentence the defendant accordingly.
6. If the court grants a motion under paragraph (i) or paragraph (k)
of subdivision one of this section, it must vacate the judgment and
dismiss the accusatory instrument, and may take such additional action
as is appropriate in the circumstances. In the case of a motion granted
under paragraph (i) of subdivision one of this section, the court must
vacate the judgment on the merits because the defendant's participation
in the offense was a result of having been a victim of trafficking.
7. Upon a new trial resulting from an order vacating a judgment
pursuant to this section, the indictment is deemed to contain all the
counts and to charge all the offenses which it contained and charged at
the time the previous trial was commenced, regardless of whether any
count was dismissed by the court in the course of such trial, except (a)
those upon or of which the defendant was acquitted or deemed to have
been acquitted, and (b) those dismissed by the order vacating the
judgment, and (c) those previously dismissed by an appellate court upon
an appeal from the judgment, or by any court upon a previous
post-judgment motion.
8. Upon an order which vacates a judgment based upon a plea of guilty
to an accusatory instrument or a part thereof, but which does not
dismiss the entire accusatory instrument, the criminal action is, in the
absence of an express direction to the contrary, restored to its
prepleading status and the accusatory instrument is deemed to contain
all the counts and to charge all the offenses which it contained and
charged at the time of the entry of the plea, except those subsequently
dismissed under circumstances specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
subdivision six. Where the plea of guilty was entered and accepted,
pursuant to subdivision three of section 220.30, upon the condition that
it constituted a complete disposition not only of the accusatory
instrument underlying the judgment vacated but also of one or more other
accusatory instruments against the defendant then pending in the same
court, the order of vacation completely restores such other accusatory
instruments; and such is the case even though such order dismisses the
main accusatory instrument underlying the judgment.
9. Upon granting of a motion pursuant to paragraph (j) of subdivision
one of this section, the court may either:
(a) With the consent of the people, vacate the judgment or modify the
judgment by reducing it to one of conviction for a lesser offense; or
(b) Vacate the judgment and order a new trial wherein the defendant
enters a plea to the same offense in order to permit the court to
resentence the defendant in accordance with the amendatory provisions of
subdivision one-a of section 70.15 of the penal law.
Motion to set aside sentence; by defendant.
1. At any time after the entry of a judgment, the court in which the
judgment was entered may, upon motion of the defendant, set aside the
sentence upon the ground that it was unauthorized, illegally imposed or
otherwise invalid as a matter of law. Where the judgment includes a
sentence of death, the court may also set aside the sentence upon any of
the grounds set forth in paragraph (b), (c), (f), (g) or (h) of
subdivision one of section 440.10 as applied to a separate sentencing
proceeding under section 400.27, provided, however, that to the extent
the ground or grounds asserted include one or more of the aforesaid
paragraphs of subdivision one of section 440.10, the court must also
apply subdivisions two and three of section 440.10, other than paragraph
(d) of subdivision two of such section, in determining the motion. In
the event the court enters an order granting a motion to set aside a
sentence of death under this section, the court must either direct a new
sentencing proceeding in accordance with section 400.27 or, to the
extent that the defendant cannot be resentenced to death consistent with
the laws of this state or the constitution of this state or of the
United States, resentence the defendant to life imprisonment without
parole or to a sentence of imprisonment for the class A-I felony of
murder in the first degree other than a sentence of life imprisonment
without parole. Upon granting the motion upon any of the grounds set
forth in the aforesaid paragraphs of subdivision one of section 440.10
and setting aside the sentence, the court must afford the people a
reasonable period of time, which shall not be less than ten days, to
determine whether to take an appeal from the order setting aside the
sentence of death. The taking of an appeal by the people stays the
effectiveness of that portion of the court's order that directs a new
sentencing proceeding.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court must
deny such a motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon was
previously determined on the merits upon an appeal from the judgment or
sentence, unless since the time of such appellate determination there
has been a retroactively effective change in the law controlling such
issue.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court may
deny such a motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon was
previously determined on the merits upon a prior motion or proceeding in
a court of this state, other than an appeal from the judgment, or upon a
prior motion or proceeding in a federal court, unless since the time of
such determination there has been a retroactively effective change in
the law controlling such issue. Despite such determination, however,
the court in the interest of justice and for good cause shown, may in
its discretion grant the motion if it is otherwise meritorious.
4. An order setting aside a sentence pursuant to this section does
not affect the validity or status of the underlying conviction, and
after entering such an order the court must resentence the defendant in
accordance with the law.
Motion to vacate judgment and to set aside sentence; procedure.
1. (a) A motion to vacate a judgment pursuant to section 440.10 of
this article and a motion to set aside a sentence pursuant to section
440.20 of this article must be made in writing and upon reasonable
notice to the people. Upon the motion, a defendant who is in a position
adequately to raise more than one ground should raise every such ground
upon which he or she intends to challenge the judgment or sentence. If
the motion is based upon the existence or occurrence of facts, the
motion papers must contain sworn allegations thereof, whether by the
defendant or by another person or persons. Such sworn allegations may be
based upon personal knowledge of the affiant or upon information and
belief, provided that in the latter event the affiant must state the
sources of such information and the grounds of such belief. The
defendant may further submit documentary evidence or information
supporting or tending to support the allegations of the moving papers.
The people may file with the court, and in such case must serve a copy
thereof upon the defendant or his or her counsel, if any, an answer
denying or admitting any or all of the allegations of the motion papers,
and may further submit documentary evidence or information refuting or
tending to refute such allegations. After all papers of both parties
have been filed, and after all documentary evidence or information, if
any, has been submitted, the court must consider the same for the
purpose of ascertaining whether the motion is determinable without a
hearing to resolve questions of fact.
(b) In conjunction with the filing or consideration of a motion to
vacate a judgment pursuant to section 440.10 of this article by a
defendant convicted after a trial, in cases where the court has ordered
an evidentiary hearing upon such motion, the court may order that the
people produce or make available for inspection property in its
possession, custody, or control that was secured in connection with the
investigation or prosecution of the defendant upon credible allegations
by the defendant and a finding by the court that such property, if
obtained, would be probative to the determination of defendant's actual
innocence, and that the request is reasonable. The court shall deny or
limit such a request upon a finding that such a request, if granted,
would threaten the integrity or chain of custody of property or the
integrity of the processes or functions of a laboratory conducting DNA
testing, pose a risk of harm, intimidation, embarrassment, reprisal, or
other substantially negative consequences to any person, undermine the
proper functions of law enforcement including the confidentiality of
informants, or on the basis of any other factor identified by the court
in the interests of justice or public safety. The court shall further
ensure that any property produced pursuant to this paragraph is subject
to a protective order, where appropriate. The court shall deny any
request made pursuant to this paragraph where:
(i) (1) the defendant's motion pursuant to section 440.10 of this
article does not seek to demonstrate his or her actual innocence of the
offense or offenses of which he or she was convicted that are the
subject of the motion, or (2) the defendant has not presented credible
allegations and the court has not found that such property, if obtained,
would be probative to the determination of the defendant's actual
innocence and that the request is reasonable;
(ii) the defendant has made his or her motion after five years from
the date of the judgment of conviction; provided, however, that this
limitation period shall be tolled for five years if the defendant is in
custody in connection with the conviction that is the subject of his or
her motion, and provided further that, notwithstanding such limitation
periods, the court may consider the motion if the defendant has shown:
(A) that he or she has been pursuing his or her rights diligently and
that some extraordinary circumstance prevented the timely filing of the
motion; (B) that the facts upon which the motion is predicated were
unknown to the defendant or his or her attorney and could not have been
ascertained by the exercise of due diligence prior to the expiration of
the statute of limitations; or (C) considering all circumstances of the
case including but not limited to evidence of the defendant's guilt, the
impact of granting or denying such motion upon public confidence in the
criminal justice system, or upon the safety or welfare of the community,
and the defendant's diligence in seeking to obtain the requested
property or related relief, the interests of justice would be served by
considering the motion;
(iii) the defendant is challenging a judgment convicting him or her of
an offense that is not a felony defined in section 10.00 of the penal
law; or
(iv) upon a finding by the court that the property requested in this
motion would be available through other means through reasonable efforts
by the defendant to obtain such property.
1-a. (a) (1) Where the defendant's motion requests the performance of
a forensic DNA test on specified evidence, and upon the court's
determination that any evidence containing deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA")
was secured in connection with the trial resulting in the judgment, the
court shall grant the application for forensic DNA testing of such
evidence upon its determination that if a DNA test had been conducted on
such evidence, and if the results had been admitted in the trial
resulting in the judgment, there exists a reasonable probability that
the verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant.
(2) Where the defendant's motion for forensic DNA testing of specified
evidence is made following a plea of guilty and entry of judgment
thereon convicting him or her of: (A) a homicide offense defined in
article one hundred twenty-five of the penal law, any felony sex offense
defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law, a violent felony
offense as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 70.02
of the penal law, or (B) any other felony offense to which he or she
pled guilty after being charged in an indictment or information in
superior court with one or more of the offenses listed in clause (A) of
this subparagraph, then the court shall grant such a motion upon its
determination that evidence containing DNA was secured in connection
with the investigation or prosecution of the defendant, and if a DNA
test had been conducted on such evidence and the results had been known
to the parties prior to the entry of the defendant's plea and judgment
thereon, there exists a substantial probability that the evidence would
have established the defendant's actual innocence of the offense or
offenses that are the subject of the defendant's motion; provided,
however, that:
(i) the court shall consider whether the defendant had the opportunity
to request such testing prior to entering a guilty plea, and, where it
finds that the defendant had such opportunity and unjustifiably failed
to do so, the court may deny such motion; and
(ii) a court shall deny the defendant's motion for forensic DNA
testing where the defendant has made his or her motion more than five
years after entry of the judgment of conviction; except that the
limitation period may be tolled if the defendant has shown: (A) that he
or she has been pursuing his or her rights diligently and that some
extraordinary circumstance prevented the timely filing of the motion for
forensic DNA testing; (B) that the facts upon which the motion is
predicated were unknown to the defendant or his or her attorney and
could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence prior
to the expiration of this statute of limitations; or (C) considering all
circumstances of the case including but not limited to evidence of the
defendant's guilt, the impact of granting or denying such motion upon
public confidence in the criminal justice system, or upon the safety or
welfare of the community, and the defendant's diligence in seeking to
obtain the requested property or related relief, the interests of
justice would be served by tolling such limitation period.
(b) In conjunction with the filing of a motion under this subdivision,
the court may direct the people to provide the defendant with
information in the possession of the people concerning the current
physical location of the specified evidence and if the specified
evidence no longer exists or the physical location of the specified
evidence is unknown, a representation to that effect and information and
documentary evidence in the possession of the people concerning the last
known physical location of such specified evidence. If there is a
finding by the court that the specified evidence no longer exists or the
physical location of such specified evidence is unknown, such
information in and of itself shall not be a factor from which any
inference unfavorable to the people may be drawn by the court in
deciding a motion under this section. The court, on motion of the
defendant, may also issue a subpoena duces tecum directing a public or
private hospital, laboratory or other entity to produce such specified
evidence in its possession and/or information and documentary evidence
in its possession concerning the location and status of such specified
evidence.
(c) In response to a motion under this paragraph, upon notice to the
parties and to the entity required to perform the search the court may
order an entity that has access to the combined DNA index system
("CODIS") or its successor system to compare a DNA profile obtained from
probative biological material gathered in connection with the
investigation or prosecution of the defendant against DNA databanks by
keyboard searches, or a similar method that does not involve uploading,
upon a court's determination that (1) such profile complies with federal
bureau of investigation or state requirements, whichever are applicable
and as such requirements are applied to law enforcement agencies seeking
such a comparison, and that the data meet state DNA index system and/or
national DNA index system criteria as such criteria are applied to law
enforcement agencies seeking such a comparison and (2) if such
comparison had been conducted, and if the results had been admitted in
the trial resulting in the judgment, a reasonable probability exists
that the verdict would have been more favorable to the defendant, or in
a case involving a plea of guilty, if the results had been available to
the defendant prior to the plea, a reasonable probability exists that
the conviction would not have resulted. For purposes of this
subdivision, a "keyboard search" shall mean a search of a DNA profile
against the databank in which the profile that is searched is not
uploaded to or maintained in the databank.
2. If it appears by conceded or uncontradicted allegations of the
moving papers or of the answer, or by unquestionable documentary proof,
that there are circumstances which require denial thereof pursuant to
subdivision two of section 440.10 or subdivision two of section 440.20,
the court must summarily deny the motion. If it appears that there are
circumstances authorizing, though not requiring, denial thereof pursuant
to subdivision three of section 440.10 or subdivision three of section
440.20, the court may in its discretion either (a) summarily deny the
motion, or (b) proceed to consider the merits thereof.
3. Upon considering the merits of the motion, the court must grant it
without conducting a hearing and vacate the judgment or set aside the
sentence, as the case may be, if:
(a) The moving papers allege a ground constituting legal basis for the
motion; and
(b) Such ground, if based upon the existence or occurrence of facts,
is supported by sworn allegations thereof; and
(c) The sworn allegations of fact essential to support the motion are
either conceded by the people to be true or are conclusively
substantiated by unquestionable documentary proof.
4. Upon considering the merits of the motion, the court may deny it
without conducting a hearing if:
(a) The moving papers do not allege any ground constituting legal
basis for the motion; or
(b) The motion is based upon the existence or occurrence of facts and
the moving papers do not contain sworn allegations substantiating or
tending to substantiate all the essential facts, as required by
subdivision one; or
(c) An allegation of fact essential to support the motion is
conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof; or
(d) An allegation of fact essential to support the motion (i) is
contradicted by a court record or other official document, or is made
solely by the defendant and is unsupported by any other affidavit or
evidence, and (ii) under these and all the other circumstances attending
the case, there is no reasonable possibility that such allegation is
true.
5. If the court does not determine the motion pursuant to subdivisions
two, three or four, it must conduct a hearing and make findings of fact
essential to the determination thereof. The defendant has a right to be
present at such hearing but may waive such right in writing. If he does
not so waive it and if he is confined in a prison or other institution
of this state, the court must cause him to be produced at such hearing.
6. At such a hearing, the defendant has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence every fact essential to support the
motion.
7. Regardless of whether a hearing was conducted, the court, upon
determining the motion, must set forth on the record its findings of
fact, its conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination.
Motion to set aside sentence; by people.
1. At any time not more than one year after the entry of a judgment,
the court in which it was entered may, upon motion of the people, set
aside the sentence upon the ground that it was invalid as a matter of
law.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court must
summarily deny the motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon was
previously determined on the merits upon an appeal from the judgment or
sentence, unless since the time of such appellate determination there
has been a retroactively effective change in the law controlling such
issue.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, the court may
summarily deny such a motion when the ground or issue raised thereupon
was previously determined on the merits upon a prior motion or
proceeding in a court of this state, other than an appeal from the
judgment or sentence, unless since the time of such determination there
has been a retroactively effective change in the law controlling such
issue. Despite such circumstance, however, the court, in the interests
of justice and for good cause shown, may in its discretion grant the
motion if it is otherwise meritorious.
4. The motion must be made upon reasonable notice to the defendant
and to the attorney if any who appeared for him in the last proceeding
which occurred in connection with the judgment or sentence, and the
defendant must be given adequate opportunity to appear in opposition to
the motion. The defendant has a right to be present at such proceeding
but may waive such right in writing. If he does not so waive it and if
he is confined in a prison or other institution of this state, the court
must cause him to be produced at the proceeding upon the motion.
5. An order setting aside a sentence pursuant to this section does
not affect the validity or status of the underlying conviction, and
after entering such an order the court must resentence the defendant in
accordance with the law.
6. Upon a resentence imposed pursuant to subdivision five, the terms
of which are more severe than those of the original sentence, the
defendant's time for taking an appeal from the judgment is automatically
extended in the manner prescribed in subdivision four of section 450.30.
Motion for resentence; certain controlled substance offenders.
1. Any person in the custody of the department of corrections and
community supervision convicted of a class B felony offense defined in
article two hundred twenty of the penal law which was committed prior to
January thirteenth, two thousand five, who is serving an indeterminate
sentence with a maximum term of more than three years, may, except as
provided in subdivision five of this section, upon notice to the
appropriate district attorney, apply to be resentenced to a determinate
sentence in accordance with sections 60.04 and 70.70 of the penal law in
the court which imposed the sentence.
2. As part of any such application, the defendant may also move to be
resentenced to a determinate sentence in accordance with section 70.70
of the penal law for any one or more class C, D, or E felony offenses
defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the
penal law, the sentence or sentences for which were imposed by the
sentencing court at the same time or were included in the same order of
commitment as such class B felony.
3. The provisions of section twenty-three of chapter seven hundred
thirty-eight of the laws of two thousand four shall govern the
proceedings on and determination of a motion brought pursuant to this
section; provided, however that the court's consideration of the
institutional record of confinement of such person shall include but not
be limited to such person's participation in or willingness to
participate in treatment or other programming while incarcerated and
such person's disciplinary history. The fact that a person may have been
unable to participate in treatment or other programming while
incarcerated despite such person's willingness to do so shall not be
considered a negative factor in determining a motion pursuant to this
section.
4. Subdivision one of section seven hundred seventeen and subdivision
four of section seven hundred twenty-two of the county law, and the
related provisions of article eighteen-A of such law, shall apply to the
preparation of and proceedings on motions pursuant to this section,
including any appeals.
5. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any person who is
serving a sentence on a conviction for or has a predicate felony
conviction for an exclusion offense. For purposes of this subdivision,
an "exclusion offense" is:
(a) a crime for which the person was previously convicted within the
preceding ten years, excluding any time during which the offender was
incarcerated for any reason between the time of commission of the
previous felony and the time of commission of the present felony, which
was: (i) a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the
penal law; or (ii) any other offense for which a merit time allowance is
not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of
subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the correction law; or
(b) a second violent felony offense pursuant to section 70.04 of the
penal law or a persistent violent felony offense pursuant to section
70.08 of the penal law for which the person has previously been
adjudicated.
Motion for resentence; persons convicted of certain marihuana
offenses.
1. When a person is serving a sentence for a conviction in this state,
whether by trial verdict or guilty plea, under former article two
hundred twenty-one of the penal law, and such persons' conduct as
alleged in the accusatory instrument and/or shown by the guilty plea or
trial verdict would not have been a crime under article two hundred
twenty-two of the penal law, had such article two hundred twenty-two
rather than former article two hundred twenty-one of the penal law been
in effect at the time of such conduct, then the chief administrative
judge of the state of New York shall, in accordance with this section,
automatically vacate, dismiss and expunge such conviction in accordance
with section 160.50 of this chapter, and the office of court
administration shall immediately notify the state division of criminal
justice services, state department of corrections and community
supervision and the appropriate local correctional facility which shall
immediately effectuate the appropriate relief. Such notification to the
division of criminal justice services shall also direct that such agency
notify all relevant police and law enforcement agencies of their duty to
destroy and/or mark records related to such case in accordance with
section 160.50 of this chapter. Nothing in this section shall prevent a
person who believes his or her sentence is required by this section to
be vacated, dismissed and/or expunged from filing a petition with the
court to effectuate all appropriate relief.
2. (a) When a person is serving or has completed serving a sentence
for a conviction in this state, whether by trial verdict or guilty plea,
under former article two hundred twenty-one of the penal law, and such
person's conduct as alleged in the accusatory instrument and/or shown by
the guilty plea or trial verdict, or shown by other information: (i)
would not have been a crime under article two hundred twenty-two of the
penal law, had such article two hundred twenty-two rather than former
article two hundred twenty-one of the penal law been in effect at the
time of such conduct; or (ii) under such circumstances such person would
have been guilty of a lesser or potentially less onerous offense under
such article two hundred twenty-two than such former article two hundred
twenty-one of the penal law; then such person may petition the court of
conviction pursuant to this article for vacatur of such conviction.
(b) (i) Upon receiving a served and filed motion under paragraph (a)
of this subdivision, the court shall presume that any conviction by plea
was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent and that any conviction by
verdict and any accompanying sentence constitutes cruel and unusual
punishment under the state constitution if either has severe or ongoing
consequences, including but not limited to potential or actual
immigration consequences; and the court shall further presume that the
movant satisfies the criteria in such paragraph (a) and thereupon make
such finding and grant the motion to vacate such conviction on such
grounds in a written order unless the party opposing the motion proves,
by clear and convincing evidence, that the movant does not satisfy the
criteria to bring such motion.
(ii) If the petition meets the criteria in subparagraph (ii) of
paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the court after affording the parties
an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, may substitute, unless
it is not in the interests of justice to do so, a conviction for an
appropriate lesser offense under article two hundred twenty-two of the
penal law.
(c) In the event of any vacatur and/or substitution pursuant to this
subdivision, the office of court administration shall immediately notify
the state division of criminal justice services concerning such
determination. Such notification to the division of criminal justice
services shall also direct that such agency notify all relevant police
and law enforcement agencies of their duty to destroy and/or mark
records related to such case in accordance with section 160.50 of this
chapter or, where conviction for a crime is substituted pursuant to this
subdivision, update such agencies' records accordingly.
3. Under no circumstances may substitution under this section result
in the imposition of a term of imprisonment or sentencing term,
obligation or condition that is in any way either harsher than the
original sentence or harsher than the sentence authorized for any
substituted lesser offense.
4. (a) If the judge who originally sentenced the movant for such
offense is not reasonably available, then the presiding judge for such
court shall designate another judge authorized to act in the appropriate
jurisdiction to determine the petition or application.
(b) Unless requested by the movant, no hearing is necessary to grant
an application filed under subdivision two of this section.
(c) When a felony conviction is vacated pursuant to this section and a
lesser offense that is a misdemeanor or violation is substituted for
such conviction, such lesser offense shall be considered a misdemeanor
or violation, as the case may be, for all purposes. When a misdemeanor
conviction is vacated pursuant to this section and a lesser offense that
is a violation is substituted for such conviction, such lesser offense
shall be considered a violation for all purposes.
(d) Nothing in this section is intended to or shall diminish or
abrogate any rights or remedies otherwise available to a defendant,
petitioner or applicant. Relief under this section is available
notwithstanding that the judgment was for a violation of former sections
221.05, 221.10, 221.15, 221.20, 221.35 or 221.40 of the penal law in
effect prior to the effective date of this paragraph and that the
underlying action or proceeding has already been vacated, dismissed and
expunged.
(e) Nothing in this and related sections of law is intended to
diminish or abrogate the finality of judgments in any case not falling
within the purview of this section.
(f) The provisions of this section shall be available, used and
applied in parallel fashion by the family court and the criminal courts
to juvenile delinquency adjudications, adolescent offender adjudications
and youthful offender adjudications.
(g) The chief administrator of the courts shall promulgate all
necessary rules and make available all necessary forms to enable the
filing of the petitions and applications provided in this section no
later than sixty days following the effective date of this section. All
sentences eligible for automatic vacatur, dismissal and expungement
pursuant to subdivision one of this section shall be identified and the
required entities notified within one year of the effective date of this
section.
Motion for resentence; domestic violence cases.
1. (a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, any person
confined in an institution operated by the department of correction and
community supervision serving a sentence with a minimum or determinate
term of eight years or more for an offense committed prior to the
effective date of this section and eligible for an alternative sentence
pursuant to section 60.12 of the penal law may, on or after such
effective date, submit to the judge or justice who imposed the original
sentence upon such person a request to apply for resentencing in
accordance with section 60.12 of the penal law. Such person must include
in his or her request documentation proving that she or he is confined
in an institution operated by the department of corrections and
community supervision serving a sentence with a minimum or determinate
term of eight years or more for an offense committed prior to the
effective date of this section and that she or he is serving such
sentence for any offense eligible for an alternative sentence under
section 60.12 of the penal law.
(b) If, at the time of such person's request to apply for resentencing
pursuant to this section, the original sentencing judge or justice is a
judge or justice of a court of competent jurisdiction, but such court is
not the court in which the original sentence was imposed, then the
request shall be randomly assigned to another judge or justice of the
court in which the original sentence was imposed. If the original
sentencing judge is no longer a judge or justice of a court of competent
jurisdiction, then the request shall be randomly assigned to another
judge or justice of the court.
(c) If the court finds that such person has met the requirements to
apply for resentencing in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the court
shall notify such person that he or she may submit an application for
resentencing. Upon such notification, the person may request that the
court assign him or her an attorney for the preparation of and
proceedings on the application for resentencing pursuant to this
section. The attorney shall be assigned in accordance with the
provisions of subdivision one of section seven hundred seventeen and
subdivision four of section seven hundred twenty-two of the county law
and the related provisions of article eighteen-A of such law.
(d) If the court finds that such person has not met the requirements
to apply for resentencing in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of this
section, the court shall notify such person and dismiss his or her
request without prejudice.
2. (a) Upon the court's receipt of an application for resentencing,
the court shall promptly notify the appropriate district attorney and
provide such district attorney with a copy of the application.
(b) If the judge or justice that received the application is not the
original sentencing judge or justice, the application may be referred to
the original sentencing judge or justice provided that he or she is a
judge or justice of a court of competent jurisdiction and that the
applicant and the district attorney agree that the application should be
referred.
(c) An application for resentencing pursuant to this section must
include at least two pieces of evidence corroborating the applicant's
claim that he or she was, at the time of the offense, a victim of
domestic violence subjected to substantial physical, sexual or
psychological abuse inflicted by a member of the same family or
household as the applicant as such term is defined in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this chapter.
At least one piece of evidence must be either a court record,
pre-sentence report, social services record, hospital record, sworn
statement from a witness to the domestic violence, law enforcement
record, domestic incident report, or order of protection. Other evidence
may include, but shall not be limited to, local and state department of
corrections records, a showing based in part on documentation prepared
at or near the time of the commission of the offense or the prosecution
thereof tending to support the person's claim, or when there is
verification of consultation with a licensed medical or mental health
care provider, employee of a court acting within the scope of his or her
employment, member of the clergy, attorney, social worker, or rape
crisis counselor as defined in section forty-five hundred ten of the
civil practice law and rules, or other advocate acting on behalf of an
agency that assists victims of domestic violence for the purpose of
assisting such person with domestic violence victim counseling or
support.
(d) If the court finds that the applicant has not complied with the
provisions of paragraph (c) of this subdivision, the court shall dismiss
the application without prejudice.
(e) If the court finds that the applicant has complied with the
provisions of paragraph (c) of this subdivision, the court shall conduct
a hearing to aid in making its determination of whether the applicant
should be resentenced in accordance with section 60.12 of the penal law.
At such hearing the court shall determine any controverted issue of fact
relevant to the issue of sentencing. Reliable hearsay shall be
admissible at such hearings.
The court may consider any fact or circumstances relevant to the
imposition of a new sentence which are submitted by the applicant or the
district attorney and may, in addition, consider the institutional
record of confinement of such person, but shall not order a new
pre-sentence investigation and report or entertain any matter
challenging the underlying basis of the subject conviction. The court's
consideration of the institutional record of confinement of such
applicant shall include, but not be limited to, such applicant's
participation in or willingness to participate in programming such as
domestic violence, parenting and substance abuse treatment while
incarcerated and such applicant's disciplinary history. The fact that
the applicant may have been unable to participate in treatment or other
programming while incarcerated despite such applicant's willingness to
do so shall not be considered a negative factor in determining a motion
pursuant to this section.
(f) If the court determines that the applicant should not be
resentenced in accordance with section 60.12 of the penal law, the court
shall inform such applicant of its decision and shall enter an order to
that effect. Any order issued by a court pursuant to this section must
include written findings of fact and the reasons for such order.
(g) If the court determines that the applicant should be resentenced
in accordance with section 60.12 of the penal law, the court shall
notify the applicant that, unless he or she withdraws the application or
appeals from such order, the court will enter an order vacating the
sentence originally imposed and imposing the new sentence to be imposed
as authorized by section 60.12 of the penal law. Any order issued by a
court pursuant to this section must include written findings of fact and
the reasons for such order.
3. An appeal may be taken as of right in accordance with applicable
provisions of this chapter: (a) from an order denying resentencing; or
(b) from a new sentence imposed under this provision and may be based on
the grounds that (i) the term of the new sentence is harsh or excessive;
or (ii) that the term of the new sentence is unauthorized as a matter of
law. An appeal in accordance with the applicable provisions of this
chapter may also be taken as of right by the applicant from an order
specifying and informing such applicant of the term of the determinate
sentence the court would impose upon resentencing on the ground that the
term of the proposed sentence is harsh or excessive; upon remand to the
sentencing court following such appeal the applicant shall be given an
opportunity to withdraw an application for resentencing before any
resentence is imposed. The applicant may request that the court assign
him or her an attorney for the preparation of and proceedings on any
appeals regarding his or her application for resentencing pursuant to
this section. The attorney shall be assigned in accordance with the
provisions of subdivision one of section seven hundred seventeen and
subdivision four of section seven hundred twenty-two of the county law
and the related provisions of article eighteen-A of such law.
4. In calculating the new term to be served by the applicant pursuant
to section 60.12 of the penal law, such applicant shall be credited for
any jail time credited towards the subject conviction as well as any
period of incarceration credited toward the sentence originally imposed.
Notice to crime victims of case disposition.
1. Upon the request of a victim of a crime, or in any event in all
cases in which the final disposition includes a conviction of a violent
felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law, a felony
defined in article one hundred twenty-five of such law, or a felony
defined in article one hundred thirty of such law, the district attorney
shall, within sixty days of the final disposition of the case, inform
the victim by letter of such final disposition. If such final
disposition results in the commitment of the defendant to the custody of
the department of corrections and community supervision for an
indeterminate sentence, the notice provided to the crime victim shall
also inform the victim of his or her right to submit a written,
audiotaped, or videotaped victim impact statement to the department of
corrections and community supervision or to meet personally with a
member of the state board of parole at a time and place separate from
the personal interview between a member or members of the board and the
incarcerated individual and make such a statement, subject to procedures
and limitations contained in rules of the board, both pursuant to
subdivision two of section two hundred fifty-nine-i of the executive
law. A copy of such letter shall be provided to the board of parole. The
right of the victim under this subdivision to submit a written victim
impact statement or to meet personally with a member of the state board
of parole applies to each personal interview between a member or members
of the board and the incarcerated individual.
2. As used in this section, "victim" means any person alleged or
found, upon the record, to have sustained physical or financial injury
to person or property as a direct result of the crime charged or a
person alleged or found to have sustained, upon the record, an offense
under article one hundred thirty of the penal law, or in the case of a
homicide or minor child, the victim's family.
3. As used in this section, "final disposition" means an ultimate
termination of the case at the trial level including, but not limited
to, dismissal, acquittal, or imposition of sentence by the court, or a
decision by the district attorney, for whatever reason, to not file the
case.
Notice to education department where a licensed professional
has been convicted of a felony.
The district attorney shall give written notification to the
department of education upon the conviction of a felony of any person
holding a license pursuant to title eight of the education law. In
addition, the district attorney shall give written notification to the
department upon the vacatur or reversal of any felony conviction of any
such person.
Notification of invalid sentences of probation.
Whenever it shall appear to the satisfaction of the appropriate
director of the probation department that a person sentenced pursuant to
article sixty of the penal law has received a sentence which is invalid
as a matter of law, it shall become his duty to notify the district
attorney of the county in which such person was convicted. Upon such
notification, the district attorney shall immediately investigate the
matter and if such sentence of probation is in fact invalid as a matter
of law, the district attorney shall immediately move to set aside such
sentence pursuant to section 440.40 of this chapter.
Notice to child protective agency of conviction for certain
crimes against a child.
Upon conviction of any person for a crime under article one hundred
twenty, article one hundred twenty-five, article one hundred thirty,
article two hundred sixty or article two hundred sixty-three of the
penal law committed against a child under the age of eighteen by a
person legally responsible for such child, as defined in subdivision
three of section four hundred twelve of the social services law, the
district attorney serving the jurisdiction in which such conviction is
entered shall notify the local child protective services agency of such
conviction including the name of the defendant, the name of the child,
the court case number and the name of the prosecutor who appeared for
the people.
Notice to the secretary of state when false financing statement
filed.
Upon conviction of any person for a crime where the defendant
intentionally filed or caused to be filed a financing statement pursuant
to article nine of the uniform commercial code on form UCC1 that falsely
claims that a person is indebted or obligated to such defendant, the
court wherein such conviction is entered, or the clerk thereof, shall
issue and cause to be filed a certificate with the New York secretary of
state: (a) certifying that a judgment of conviction has been entered in
such court against the defendant who was listed as the secured party in
such form; and (b) specifying the date and location of the filing, any
filing or indexing number assigned to such filing, the debtor named in
such statement, and a description of the collateral encumbered by the
instrument.
ARTICLE 450 Appeals--in What Cases Authorized and to What Courts Taken
Appeal by defendant to intermediate appellate court; in what
cases authorized as of right.
An appeal to an intermediate appellate court may be taken as of right
by the defendant from the following judgment, sentence and order of a
criminal court:
1. A judgment other than one including a sentence of death, unless
the appeal is based solely upon the ground that a sentence was harsh or
excessive when such sentence was predicated upon entry of a plea of
guilty and the sentence imposed did not exceed that which was agreed to
by the defendant as a condition of the plea and set forth on the record
or filed with the court as required by subdivision five of section
220.50 or subdivision four of section 340.20;
2. A sentence other than one of death, as prescribed in subdivision
one of section 450.30, unless the appeal is based solely upon the ground
that a sentence was harsh or excessive when such sentence was predicated
upon entry of a plea of guilty and the sentence imposed did not exceed
that which was agreed to by the defendant as a condition of the plea and
set forth in the record or filed with the court as required by
subdivision five of section 220.50 or subdivision four of section
340.20;
3. A sentence including an order of criminal forfeiture entered
pursuant to section 460.30 of the penal law with respect to such
forfeiture order.
4. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.40, setting aside a
sentence other than one of death, upon motion of the People.
5. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to subdivision one-a of
section 440.30, for forensic DNA testing of evidence.
Appeal by defendant to intermediate appellate court; in what
cases authorized by permission.
If an appeal by defendant is not authorized as of right pursuant to
section 450.10, the defendant may appeal from the following orders of a
criminal court, provided that a certificate granting leave to appeal is
issued pursuant to section 460.15:
1. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to section 440.10, to
vacate a judgment other than one including a sentence of death;
2. An order denying a motion by the defendant made pursuant to
section 440.20, to set aside a sentence other than one of death;
3. A sentence which is not otherwise appealable as of right pursuant
to subdivision one or two of section 450.10.
Appeal by people to intermediate appellate court; in what cases
authorized.
An appeal to an intermediate appellate court may be taken as of right
by the people from the following sentence and orders of a criminal
court:
1. An order dismissing an accusatory instrument or a count thereof,
entered pursuant to section 170.30, 170.50 or 210.20, or an order
terminating a prosecution pursuant to subdivision four of section
1-a. An order reducing a count or counts of an indictment or
dismissing an indictment and directing the filing of a prosecutor's
information, entered pursuant to subdivision one-a of section 210.20;
2. An order setting aside a verdict and dismissing an accusatory
instrument or a count thereof, entered pursuant to paragraph (b) of
subdivision one of section 290.10 or 360.40;
3. An order setting aside a verdict, entered pursuant to section
4. A sentence other than one of death, as prescribed in subdivisions
two and three of section 450.30;
5. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.10, vacating a judgment
other than one including a sentence of death;
6. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.20, setting aside a
sentence other than one of death;
7. An order denying a motion by the people, made pursuant to section
440.40, to set aside a sentence other than one of death;
8. An order suppressing evidence, entered before trial pursuant to
section 710.20; provided that the people file a statement in the
appellate court pursuant to section 450.50.
9. An order entered pursuant to section 460.30 of the penal law
setting aside or modifying a verdict of forfeiture.
10. An order, entered pursuant to paragraph (e) of subdivision twelve
of section 400.27, finding that the defendant is mentally retarded.
11. An order granting a motion, made pursuant to subdivision one-a of
section 440.30, for forensic DNA testing of evidence.
12. That portion of an order dismissing an accusatory instrument or
some of its counts pursuant to subdivision two of section 245.80 of this
part as a sanction for failure to comply with any discovery order issued
pursuant to article two hundred forty-five of this part.
Appeal from sentence.
1. An appeal by the defendant from a sentence, as authorized by
subdivision two of section 450.10, may be based upon the ground that
such sentence either was (a) invalid as a matter of law, or (b) harsh or
excessive. A sentence is invalid as a matter of law not only when the
terms thereof are unauthorized but also when it is based upon an
erroneous determination that the defendant had a previous valid
conviction for an offense or, in the case of a resentence following a
revocation of a sentence of probation or conditional discharge, upon an
improper revocation of such original sentence. An appeal by the
defendant from a sentence, as authorized by subdivision three of section
450.15, may be based upon the ground that such sentence was harsh or
excessive.
2. An appeal by the people from a sentence, as authorized by
subdivision four of section 450.20, may be based only upon the ground
that such sentence was invalid as a matter of law.
3. An appeal from a sentence, within the meaning of this section and
sections 450.10 and 450.20, means an appeal from either the sentence
originally imposed or from a resentence following an order vacating the
original sentence. For purposes of appeal, the judgment consists of the
conviction and the original sentence only, and when a resentence occurs
more than thirty days after the original sentence, a defendant who has
not previously filed a notice of appeal from the judgment may not appeal
from the judgment, but only from the resentence.
4. When as a result of a successful appeal by the people from a
sentence, the defendant receives a resentence the terms of which are
more severe than those of the original or reversed sentence, the
defendant, if he has not taken an appeal from the judgment, may, even
though the period for doing so as prescribed in section 460.10 has
expired, take such an appeal by filing and serving a notice of appeal,
or an affidavit of errors as the case may be, within thirty days after
imposition of the resentence. Upon such an appeal, only the conviction
is reviewable; and any appellate challenge to the resentence must be
made upon a separate appeal therefrom.
Appeal by people from trial order of dismissal.
1. An appeal by the people from a trial order of dismissal, as
authorized by subdivision two of section 450.20, may, as indicated by
section 290.10, be based either (a) upon the ground that the evidence
adduced at the trial was legally sufficient to support the count or
counts of the accusatory instrument dismissed by the order, or (b) upon
the ground that, though not legally sufficient, such evidence would have
been legally sufficient had the court not erroneously excluded
admissible evidence offered by the people.
2. If the appeal is based upon the ground specified in paragraph (b)
of subdivision one, and if the appellate court determines that the
evidence unsuccessfully offered by the people was improperly excluded,
and if at the trial the people made on offer of proof with respect
thereto pursuant to subdivision three of section 290.10, the appellate
court, in making its determination whether the people's evidence would
have been legally sufficient had it not been for the improper exclusion,
must treat the excluded evidentiary matter as it is summarized in the
offer of proof as evidence constituting a part of the people's case.
Appeal by people from order suppressing evidence; filing of
statement in appellate court.
1. In taking an appeal, pursuant to subdivision eight of section
450.20, to an intermediate appellate court from an order of a criminal
court suppressing evidence, the people must file, in addition to a
notice of appeal or, as the case may be, an affidavit of errors, a
statement asserting that the deprivation of the use of the evidence
ordered suppressed has rendered the sum of the proof available to the
people with respect to a criminal charge which has been filed in the
court either (a) insufficient as a matter of law, or (b) so weak in its
entirety that any reasonable possibility of prosecuting such charge to a
conviction has been effectively destroyed.
2. The taking of an appeal by the people, pursuant to subdivision
eight of section 450.20, from an order suppressing evidence constitutes
a bar to the prosecution of the accusatory instrument involving the
evidence ordered suppressed, unless and until such suppression order is
reversed upon appeal and vacated.
Appeal by people from order reducing a count of an indictment
or directing the filing of a prosecutor's information.
In taking an appeal to an intermediate appellate court pursuant to
subdivision one-a of section 450.20, the people shall file a notice of
appeal. Upon request of either party, the hearing and determination of
such appeal shall be conducted in an expeditious manner. The chief
administrator of the courts, with the advice and consent of the
administrative board of the courts, shall adopt rules for the
expeditious briefing, hearing and determination of such appeals.
Appeal to intermediate appellate court; to what court taken.
The particular intermediate appellate courts to which appeals
authorized by sections 450.10 and 450.20 must be taken are as follows:
1. An appeal from a judgment, sentence or order of the supreme court
must be taken to the appellate division of the department in which such
judgment, sentence or order was entered.
2. An appeal from a judgment, sentence or order of a county court
must be taken to the appellate division of the department in which such
judgment, sentence or order was entered.
3. An appeal from a judgment, sentence or order of a local criminal
court located outside of New York City must, except as otherwise
provided in this subdivision, be taken to the county court of the county
in which such judgment, sentence or order was entered.
If the appellate division of the second, third or fourth department
has established an appellate term of the supreme court for its
department, it may direct that appeals from such judgments, sentences
and orders of such local criminal courts, or of particular
classifications of such local criminal courts, be taken to such
appellate term of the supreme court instead of to the county court; and
in such case such an appeal must be so taken.
4. An appeal from a judgment, sentence or order of the New York City
criminal court must be taken, if such judgment, sentence or order was
entered at a term of such court held in New York or Bronx county, to the
appellate division of the first department, and, if entered at a term of
such court held in Kings, Queens or Richmond county, to the appellate
division of the second department; except that if the appellate division
of either such department has established an appellate term of the
supreme court for its department, it may direct that all such appeals be
taken thereto; and in such case such an appeal must be so taken.
Appeal by defendant directly to court of appeals; in what
cases authorized.
An appeal directly to the court of appeals may be taken as of right by
the defendant from the following judgment and orders of a superior
court:
1. A judgment including a sentence of death;
2. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to section 440.10, to
vacate a judgment including a sentence of death;
3. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to section 440.20, to set
aside a sentence of death;
4. An order denying a motion, made pursuant to paragraph (d) of
subdivision eleven of section 400.27, to set aside a sentence of death.
Appeal by people directly to court of appeals; in what cases
authorized.
An appeal directly to the court of appeals may be taken as of right by
the people from the following orders of a superior court:
1. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.10, vacating a judgment
including a sentence of death;
2. An order, entered pursuant to section 440.20, setting aside a
sentence of death
3. An order, entered pursuant to paragraph (d) of subdivision eleven
of section 400.27, setting aside a sentence of death;
4. An order, entered pursuant to subdivision twelve of section 400.27,
setting aside a sentence of death.
Appeal to court of appeals from order of intermediate appellate
court; in what cases authorized.
1. Provided that a certificate granting leave to appeal is issued
pursuant to section 460.20, an appeal may, except as provided in
subdivision two, be taken to the court of appeals by either the
defendant or the people from any adverse or partially adverse order of
an intermediate appellate court entered upon an appeal taken to such
intermediate appellate court pursuant to section 450.10, 450.15, or
450.20, or from an order granting or denying a motion to set aside an
order of an intermediate appellate court on the ground of ineffective
assistance or wrongful deprivation of appellate counsel, or by either
the defendant or the people from any adverse or partially adverse order
of an intermediate appellate court entered upon an appeal taken to such
intermediate appellate court from an order entered pursuant to section
440.46 or section 440.47 of this chapter. An order of an intermediate
appellate court is adverse to the party who was the appellant in such
court when it affirms the judgment, sentence or order appealed from, and
is adverse to the party who was the respondent in such court when it
reverses the judgment, sentence or order appealed from. An appellate
court order which modifies a judgment or order appealed from is
partially adverse to each party.
2. An appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an intermediate
appellate court reversing or modifying a judgment, sentence or order of
a criminal court may be taken only if:
(a) The court of appeals determines that the intermediate appellate
court's determination of reversal or modification was on the law alone
or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law,
would not have led to reversal or modification; or
(b) The appeal is based upon a contention that corrective action, as
that term is defined in section 470.10, taken or directed by the
intermediate appellate court was illegal.
ARTICLE 460 Appeals--taking and Perfection Thereof and Stays During Pendency Thereof
Appeal; how taken.
1. Except as provided in subdivisions two and three, an appeal taken
as of right to an intermediate appellate court or directly to the court
of appeals from a judgment, sentence or order of a criminal court is
taken as follows:
(a) A party seeking to appeal from a judgment or a sentence or an
order and sentence included within such judgment, or from a resentence,
or from an order of a criminal court not included in a judgment, must,
within thirty days after imposition of the sentence or, as the case may
be, within thirty days after service upon such party of a copy of an
order not included in a judgment, file with the clerk of the criminal
court in which such sentence was imposed or in which such order was
entered a written notice of appeal, in duplicate, stating that such
party appeals therefrom to a designated appellate court.
(b) If the defendant is the appellant, he must, within such thirty day
period, serve a copy of such notice of appeal upon the district attorney
of the county embracing the criminal court in which the judgment or
order being appealed was entered. If the appeal is directly to the court
of appeals, the district attorney, following such service upon him, must
immediately give written notice thereof to the public servant having
custody of the defendant.
(c) If the people are the appellant, they must, within such thirty day
period, serve a copy of such notice of appeal upon the defendant or upon
the attorney who last appeared for him in the court in which the order
being appealed was entered.
(d) Upon filing and service of the notice of appeal as prescribed in
paragraphs (a), (b) and (c), the appeal is deemed to have been taken.
(e) Following the filing with him of the notice of appeal in
duplicate, the clerk of the court in which the judgment, sentence or
order being appealed was entered or imposed, must endorse upon such
instruments the filing date and must transmit the duplicate notice of
appeal to the clerk of the court to which the appeal is being taken.
2. An appeal taken as of right to a county court or to an appellate
term of the supreme court from a judgment, sentence or order of a local
criminal court in a case in which the underlying proceedings were
recorded by a court stenographer is taken in the manner provided in
subdivision one; except that where no clerk is employed by such local
criminal court the appellant must file the notice of appeal with the
judge of such court, and must further file a copy thereof with the clerk
of the appellate court to which the appeal is being taken.
3. An appeal taken as of right to a county court or to an appellate
term of the supreme court from a judgment, sentence or order of a local
criminal court in a case in which the underlying proceedings were not
recorded by a court stenographer is taken as follows:
(a) Within thirty days after entry or imposition in such local
criminal court of the judgment, sentence or order being appealed, the
appellant must file with such court either (i) an affidavit of errors,
setting forth alleged errors or defects in the proceedings which are the
subjects of the appeal, or (ii) a notice of appeal. Where a notice of
appeal is filed, the appellant must serve a copy thereof upon the
respondent in the manner provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
subdivision one, and, within sixty days after the appellant receives a
transcript of the electronically recorded proceedings, must file with
such court an affidavit of errors.
(b) Not more than three days after the filing of the affidavit of
errors, the appellant must serve a copy thereof upon the respondent or
the respondent's counsel or authorized representative. If the defendant
is the appellant, such service must be upon the district attorney of the
county in which the local criminal court is located. If the people are
the appellant, such service must be upon the defendant or upon the
attorney who appeared for him in the proceedings in the local criminal
court.
(c) Upon filing and service of the affidavit of errors as prescribed
in paragraphs (a) and (b), the appeal is deemed to have been taken.
(d) Within ten days after the appellant's filing of the affidavit of
errors with the local criminal court, such court must file with the
clerk of the appellate court to which the appeal has been taken both the
affidavit of errors and the court's return, and must deliver a copy of
such return to each party or a representative thereof as indicated in
paragraph (b). The court's return must set forth or summarize evidence,
facts or occurrences in or adduced at the proceedings resulting in the
judgment, sentence or order, which constitute the factual foundation for
the contentions alleged in the affidavit of errors.
(e) If the local criminal court does not file such return within the
prescribed period, or if it files a defective return, the appellate
court, upon application of the appellant, must order such local criminal
court to file a return or an amended return, as the case may be, within
a designated time which such appellate court deems reasonable.
4. An appeal by a defendant to an intermediate appellate court by
permission, pursuant to section 450.15, is taken as follows:
(a) Within thirty days after service upon the defendant of a copy of
the order sought to be appealed, the defendant must make application,
pursuant to section 460.15, for a certificate granting leave to appeal
to the intermediate appellate court.
(b) If such application is granted and such certificate is issued, the
defendant, within fifteen days after issuance thereof, must file with
the criminal court in which the order sought to be appealed was rendered
the certificate granting leave to appeal together with a written notice
of appeal, or if the appeal is from a local criminal court in a case in
which the underlying proceedings were not recorded by a court
stenographer, either (i) an affidavit of errors, or (ii) a notice of
appeal. In all other respects the appeal shall be taken as provided in
subdivisions one, two and three.
5. An appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an intermediate
appellate court is taken as follows:
(a) Within thirty days after service upon the appellant of a copy of
the order sought to be appealed, the appellant must make application,
pursuant to section 460.20, for a certificate granting leave to appeal
to the court of appeals. The appellate division of each judicial
department shall adopt rules governing the procedures for service of a
copy of such order.
(b) If such application is granted, the issuance of the certificate
granting leave to appeal shall constitute the taking of the appeal.
6. Where a notice of appeal, an affidavit of errors, an application
for leave to appeal to an intermediate appellate court, or an
application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals is premature or
contains an inaccurate description of the judgment, sentence or order
being or sought to be appealed, the appellate court, in its discretion,
may, in the interest of justice, treat such instrument as valid. Where
an appellant files a notice of appeal within the prescribed period but,
through mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect, omits to serve a
copy thereof upon the respondent within the prescribed period, the
appellate court to which the appeal is sought to be taken may, in its
discretion and for good cause shown, permit such service to be made
within a designated period of time, and upon such service the appeal is
deemed to be taken.
Certificate granting leave to appeal to intermediate
appellate court.
1. A certificate granting leave to appeal to an intermediate
appellate court is an order of one judge or justice of the intermediate
appellate court to which the appeal is sought to be taken granting such
permission and certifying that the case involves questions of law or
fact which ought to be reviewed by the intermediate appellate court.
2. An application for such a certificate must be made in a manner
determined by the rules of the appellate division of the department in
which such intermediate appellate court is located. Not more than one
application may be made for such a certificate.
Certificate granting leave to appeal to court of appeals.
1. A certificate granting leave to appeal to the court of appeals
from an order of an intermediate appellate court is an order of a judge
granting such permission and certifying that the case involves a
question of law which ought to be reviewed by the court of appeals.
2. Such certificate may be issued by the following judges in the
indicated situations:
(a) Where the appeal sought is from an order of the appellate
division, the certificate may be issued by (i) a judge of the court of
appeals or (ii) a justice of the appellate division of the department
which entered the order sought to be appealed.
(b) Where the appeal sought is from an order of an intermediate
appellate court other than the appellate division, the certificate may
be issued only by a judge of the court of appeals.
3. An application for such a certificate must be made in the
following manner:
(a) An application to a justice of the appellate division must be
made upon reasonable notice to the respondent;
(b) An application seeking such a certificate from a judge of the
court of appeals must be made to the chief judge of such court by
submission thereof, either in writing or first orally and then in
writing, to the clerk of the court of appeals. The chief judge must
then designate a judge of such court to determine the application. The
clerk must then notify the respondent of the application and must inform
both parties of such designation.
4. A justice of the appellate division to whom such an application
has been made, or a judge of the court of appeals designated to
determine such an application, may in his discretion determine it upon
such papers as he may request the parties to submit, or upon oral
argument, or upon both.
5. Every judge or justice acting pursuant to this section shall file
with the clerk of the court of appeals, immediately upon issuance, a
copy of every certificate granting or denying leave to appeal.
Extension of time for taking appeal.
1. Upon motion to an intermediate appellate court of a defendant who
desires to take an appeal to such court from a judgment, sentence or
order of a criminal court but has failed to file a notice of appeal, an
application for leave to appeal, or, as the case may be, an affidavit of
errors, with such criminal court within the prescribed period, or upon
motion to the court of appeals of a defendant who desires to take an
appeal to such court from an order of a superior court or of an
intermediate appellate court, but has failed to make an application for
a certificate granting leave to appeal to the court of appeals, or has
failed to file a notice of appeal with the intermediate appellate court,
within the prescribed period, such intermediate appellate court or the
court of appeals, as the case may be, may order that the time for the
taking of such appeal or applying for leave to appeal be extended to a
date not more than thirty days subsequent to the determination of such
motion, upon the ground that the failure to so file or make application
in timely fashion resulted from (a) improper conduct of a public servant
or improper conduct, death or disability of the defendant's attorney, or
(b) inability of the defendant and his attorney to have communicated, in
person or by mail, concerning whether an appeal should be taken, prior
to the expiration of the time within which to take an appeal due to
defendant's incarceration in an institution and through no lack of due
diligence or fault of the attorney or defendant. Such motion must be
made with due diligence after the time for the taking of such appeal has
expired, and in any case not more than one year thereafter.
2. The motion must be in writing and upon reasonable notice to the
people and with opportunity to be heard. The motion papers must contain
sworn allegations of facts claimed to establish the improper conduct,
inability to communicate, or other facts essential to support the
motion, and the people may file papers in opposition thereto. After all
papers have been filed, the court must consider the same for the purpose
of ascertaining whether the motion is determinable without a hearing to
resolve issues of fact.
3. If the motion papers allege facts constituting a legal basis for
the motion, and if the essential allegations are either conclusively
substantiated by unquestionable documentary proof or are conceded by the
people to be true, the court must grant the motion.
4. If the motion papers do not allege facts constituting a legal
basis for the motion, or if an essential allegation is conclusively
refuted by unquestionable documentary proof, the court may deny the
motion.
5. If the court does not determine the motion pursuant to subdivision
three or four, it must order the criminal court which entered or imposed
the judgment, sentence or order sought to be appealed to conduct a
hearing and to make and report findings of fact essential to the
determination of such motion. Upon receipt of such report, the
intermediate appellate court or the court of appeals, as the case may
be, must determine the motion.
6. An order of an intermediate appellate court granting or denying a
motion made pursuant to this section is appealable to the court of
appeals if (a) such order states that the determination was made upon
the law alone, and (b) a judge of the court of appeals, pursuant to
procedure provided in section 460.20, of this chapter, issues a
certificate granting leave to the appellant to appeal to the court of
appeals.
Effect of taking of appeal upon judgment or order of courts
below; when stayed.
1. The taking of an appeal by the defendant directly to the court of
appeals, pursuant to subdivision one of section 450.70, from a superior
court judgment including a sentence of death stays the execution of such
sentence. Except as provided in subdivision two of this section, in no
other case does the taking of an appeal, by either party, in and of
itself stay the execution of any judgment, sentence or order of either a
criminal court or an intermediate appellate court.
2. The taking of an appeal by the people to an intermediate appellate
court pursuant to subdivision one-a of section 450.20, from an order
reducing a count or counts of an indictment or dismissing an indictment
and directing the filing of a prosecutor's information, stays the effect
of such order. In addition, the taking of an appeal by the people to an
intermediate appellate court pursuant to subdivision one of section
450.20, from an order dismissing a count or counts of an indictment
charging murder in the first degree, stays the effect of such order.
3. Within six months of the effective date of this subdivision, the
court of appeals shall adopt rules to ensure that a defendant is granted
a stay of the execution of any death warrant issued pursuant to article
twenty-two-B of the correction law to allow the defendant an opportunity
to prepare and timely file an initial motion pursuant to section 440.10
or 440.20 seeking to set aside a sentence of death or vacate a judgment
including a sentence of death and to allow the motion and any appeal
from the denial thereof to be timely determined. The rules shall provide
that in the event a defendant seeks to file any subsequent motion with
respect to the judgment or sentence following a final determination of
the defendant's initial motion pursuant to section 440.10 or 440.20, a
motion for a stay of the execution of the death warrant may only be
granted for good cause shown. The people and the defendant shall have a
right to appeal to the court of appeals from orders granting or denying
such stay motions and any rules adopted pursuant to this subdivision
shall provide that the court of appeals may affirm such orders, reverse
them or modify them upon such terms as the court deems appropriate and
shall provide for the expeditious perfection and determination of such
appeals. Prior to adoption of the rules, the court of appeals shall
issue proposed rules and receive written comments thereon from
interested parties.
Stay of judgment pending appeal to intermediate appellate
court.
1. Upon application of a defendant who has taken an appeal to an
intermediate appellate court from a judgment or from a sentence of a
criminal court, a judge designated in subdivision two may issue an order
both (a) staying or suspending the execution of the judgment pending the
determination of the appeal, and (b) either releasing the defendant on
his own recognizance or fixing bail pursuant to the provisions of
article five hundred thirty. That phase of the order staying or
suspending execution of the judgment does not become effective unless
and until the defendant is released, either on his own recognizance or
upon the posting of bail.
2. An order as prescribed in subdivision one may be issued by the
following judges in the indicated situations:
(a) If the appeal is to the appellate division from a judgment or a
sentence of either the supreme court or the New York City criminal
court, such order may be issued by (i) a justice of the appellate
division of the department in which the judgment was entered, or (ii) a
justice of the supreme court of the judicial district embracing the
county in which the judgment was entered;
(b) If the appeal is to the appellate division from a judgment or a
sentence of a county court, such order may be issued by (i) a justice of
such appellate division, or (ii) a justice of the supreme court of the
judicial district embracing the county in which the judgment was
entered, or (iii) a judge of such county court;
(c) If the appeal is to an appellate term of the supreme court from a
judgment or sentence of the New York City criminal court, such order may
be issued by a justice of the supreme court of the judicial district
embracing the county in which the judgment was entered;
(d) With respect to appeals to county courts from judgments or
sentences of local criminal courts, and with respect to appeals to
appellate terms of the supreme court from judgments or sentences of any
criminal courts located outside of New York City, the judges who may
issue such orders in any particular situation are determined by rules of
the appellate division of the department embracing the appellate court
to which the appeal has been taken.
3. An application for an order specified in this section must be made
upon reasonable notice to the people, and the people must be accorded
adequate opportunity to appear in opposition thereto. Not more than one
application may be made pursuant to this section.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, if within one
hundred twenty days after the issuance of such an order the appeal has
not been brought to argument in or submitted to the intermediate
appellate court, the operation of such order terminates and the
defendant must surrender himself to the criminal court in which the
judgment was entered in order that execution of the judgment be
commenced or resumed; except that this subdivision does not apply where
the intermediate appellate court has (a) extended the time for argument
or submission of the appeal to a date beyond the specified period of one
hundred twenty days, and (b) upon application of the defendant,
expressly ordered that the operation of the order continue until the
date of the determination of the appeal or some other designated future
date or occurrence.
5. Where the defendant is at liberty during the pendency of an appeal
as a result of an order issued pursuant to this section, the
intermediate appellate court, upon affirmance of the judgment, must by
appropriate certificate remit the case to the criminal court in which
such judgment was entered. The criminal court must, upon at least two
days notice to the defendant, his surety and his attorney, promptly
direct the defendant to surrender himself to the criminal court in order
that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed, and if necessary
the criminal court may issue a bench warrant to secure his appearance.
6. Upon application of a defendant who has been granted a certificate
granting leave to appeal pursuant to section 460.15 of this chapter, and
in accordance with the procedures set forth in subdivisions three, four
and five of this section, the intermediate appellate court may issue an
order both (a) staying or suspending the execution of the judgment
pending the determination of the appeal, and (b) either releasing the
defendant on his own recognizance or fixing bail pursuant to the
provisions of article five hundred thirty. That phase of the order
staying or suspending execution of the judgment does not become
effective unless and until the defendant is released, either on his own
recognizance or upon the posting of bail.
Stay of judgment pending appeal to court of appeals from
intermediate appellate court.
1. (a) A judge who, pursuant to section 460.20 of this chapter, has
received an application for a certificate granting a defendant leave to
appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an intermediate
appellate court affirming or modifying a judgment including a sentence
of imprisonment, a sentence of imprisonment, or an order appealed
pursuant to section 450.15 of this chapter, of a criminal court, may,
upon application of such defendant-appellant issue an order both (i)
staying or suspending the execution of the judgment pending the
determination of the application for leave to appeal, and, if that
application is granted, staying or suspending the execution of the
judgment pending the determination of the appeal, and (ii) either
releasing the defendant on his own recognizance or continuing bail as
previously determined or fixing bail pursuant to the provisions of
article five hundred thirty. Such an order is effective immediately
and that phase of the order staying or suspending execution of the
judgment does not become effective unless and until the defendant is
released, either on his own recognizance or upon the posting of bail.
(b) If the application for leave to appeal is denied, the stay or
suspension pending the application automatically terminates upon the
signing of the certificate denying leave. Upon such termination, the
certificate denying leave must be sent to the criminal court in which
the original judgment was entered, and the latter must proceed in the
manner provided in subdivision five of section 460.50 of this chapter.
2. An application pursuant to subdivision one must be made upon
reasonable notice to the people, and the people must be accorded
adequate opportunity to appear in opposition thereto. Such an
application may be made immediately after the entry of the order sought
to be appealed or at any subsequent time during the pendency of the
appeal. Not more than one application may be made pursuant to this
section.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, if within one
hundred twenty days after the issuance of a certificate granting leave
to appeal, the appeal or prospective appeal has not been brought to
argument in or submitted to the court of appeals, the operation of an
order issued pursuant to subdivision one of this section terminates and
the defendant must surrender himself to the criminal court in which the
original judgment was entered in order that execution of such judgment
be commenced or resumed; except that this subdivision does not apply
where the court of appeals has (a) extended the time for argument or
submission of the appeal to a date beyond the specified period of one
hundred twenty days and (b) upon application of the defendant expressly
ordered that the operation of such order continue until the date of the
determination of the appeal or some other designated future date or
occurrence.
4. Where the defendant is at liberty during the pendency of an appeal
as a result of an order issued pursuant to this section, the court of
appeals upon affirmance of the judgment or order, must, by appropriate
certificate, remit the case to the criminal court in which the judgment
was entered, and the latter must proceed in the manner provided in
subdivision five of section 460.50 of this chapter.
Appeal; how perfected.
1. Except as provided in subdivision two, the mode of and time for
perfecting an appeal which has been taken to an intermediate appellate
court from a judgement, sentence or order of a criminal court are
determined by rules of the appellate division of the department in which
such appellate court is located. Among the matters to be determined by
such court rules are the times when the appeal must be noticed for and
brought to argument, the content and form of the records and briefs to
be served and filed, and the time when such records and briefs must be
served and filed.
When an appeal is taken by a defendant pursuant to section 450.10, a
transcript shall be prepared and settled and shall be filed with the
criminal court by the court reporter. Electronically recorded
proceedings that were not recorded by a stenographer shall be
transcribed and filed with the court as directed by the chief
administrator of the courts. The expense for such transcript and any
reproduced copies of such transcript shall be paid by the defendant.
Where the defendant is granted permission to proceed as a poor person by
the appellate court, the court reporter shall promptly make and file
with the criminal court a transcript of the stenographic minutes of such
proceedings as the appellate court shall direct. The expense of
transcripts and any reproduced copies of transcripts prepared for poor
persons under this section shall be a state charge payable out of funds
appropriated to the office of court administration for that purpose. The
appellate court shall where such is necessary for perfection of the
appeal, order that the criminal court furnish a reproduced copy of such
transcript to the defendant or his counsel.
2. An appeal which has been taken to a county court or to an appellate
term of the supreme court from a judgment, sentence or order of a local
criminal court pursuant to subdivision three of section 460.10 is
perfected as follows:
(a) After the local criminal court has, pursuant to paragraph (d) of
subdivision three of section 460.10, filed its return with the clerk of
the appellate court and delivered a copy thereof to the appellant, the
appellant must file with such clerk, and serve a copy thereof upon the
respondent, a notice of argument, noticing the appeal for argument at
the term of such appellate court immediately following the term being
held at the time of the appellant's receipt of the return. Upon motion
of the appellant, however, such appellate court may for good cause shown
enlarge the time to a subsequent term, in which case the appellant must
notice the appeal for argument at such subsequent term;
(b) The appellant must further comply with all court rules applicable
to the mode of perfecting such appeals;
(c) If the appellant does not file a notice of argument as provided in
paragraph (a) or does not comply with all applicable court rules as
provided in paragraph (b), the appellate court may, either upon motion
of the respondent or upon its own motion, dismiss the appeal.
3. The mode of and time for perfecting any appeal which has been taken
to the court of appeals are determined by the rules of the court of
appeals. Among the matters to be determined by such court rules are the
times when the appeal must be noticed for and brought to argument, the
content, form and number of the records and briefs and copies thereof to
be served and filed, and the times when such records and briefs must be
served and filed.
When an appeal is taken by a defendant pursuant to section 450.70, the
defendant shall cause to be prepared and printed or otherwise duplicated
pursuant to rules of the court of appeals the record on appeal and the
required number of copies thereof. If the defendant is granted
permission to appeal as a poor person, the expense thereof shall be a
state charge payable out of funds appropriated to the office of court
administration for that purpose.
Appeal; argument and submission thereof.
The mode of and procedure for arguing or otherwise litigating appeals
in criminal cases are determined by rules of the individual appellate
courts. Among the matters to be determined by such court rules are the
circumstances in which oral argument is required and those in which the
case may be submitted by either or both parties without oral argument;
the consequences or effect of failure to present oral argument when such
is required; the amount of time for oral argument allowed to each party;
and the number of counsel entitled to be heard.
Filing of papers on appeal to the appellate division by
electronic means.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the appellate division in
each judicial department may promulgate rules authorizing a program in
the use of electronic means for the taking and perfection of appeals in
accordance with the provisions of section twenty-one hundred twelve of
the civil practice law and rules. Provided however, such rules shall not
require an unrepresented party or any attorney who furnishes a
certification specified in subparagraph (i) or (ii) of paragraph (c) of
subdivision two of section 10.40 of this chapter to take or perfect an
appeal by electronic means. Provided further, however, before
promulgating any such rules, the appellate division in each judicial
department shall consult with the chief administrator of the courts and
shall provide an opportunity for review and comment by all those who are
or would be affected including district attorneys; representatives of
the office of indigent legal services; not-for-profit legal service
providers; public defenders; statewide and local specialty bar
associations whose membership devotes a significant portion of their
practice to assigned criminal cases pursuant to subparagraph (i) of
paragraph (a) of subdivision three of section seven hundred twenty-two
of the county law; institutional providers of criminal defense services
and other members of the criminal defense bar; representatives of
victims' rights organizations; unaffiliated attorneys who regularly
appear in proceedings that are or would be affected by such electronic
filing program; interested members of the criminal justice community;
and any other persons in whose county a program has been implemented in
any of the courts therein as deemed to be appropriate by any appellate
division. To the extent practicable, rules promulgated by the appellate
division in each judicial department pursuant to this section shall be
uniform. For purposes of this section, "electronic means" shall be as
defined in subdivision (f) of rule twenty-one hundred three of such law
and rules.
ARTICLE 470 Appeals--determination Thereof
Determination of appeals; general criteria.
1. An appellate court must determine an appeal without regard to
technical errors or defects which do not affect the substantial rights
of the parties.
2. For purposes of appeal, a question of law with respect to a ruling
or instruction of a criminal court during a trial or proceeding is
presented when a protest thereto was registered, by the party claiming
error, at the time of such ruling or instruction or at any subsequent
time when the court had an opportunity of effectively changing the same.
Such protest need not be in the form of an "exception" but is sufficient
if the party made his position with respect to the ruling or instruction
known to the court, or if in reponse to a protest by a party, the court
expressly decided the question raised on appeal. In addition, a party
who without success has either expressly or impliedly sought or
requested a particular ruling or instruction, is deemed to have thereby
protested the court's ultimate disposition of the matter or failure to
rule or instruct accordingly sufficiently to raise a question of law
with respect to such disposition or failure regardless of whether any
actual protest thereto was registered.
Determination of appeals; definitions of terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "Reversal" by an appellate court of a judgment, sentence or order
of another court means the vacating of such judgment, sentence or order.
2. "Modification" by an appellate court of a judgment or order of
another court means the vacating of a part thereof and affirmance of the
remainder.
3. "Corrective action" means affirmative action taken or directed by
an appellate court upon reversing or modifying a judgment, sentence or
order of another court, which disposes of or continues the case in a
manner consonant with the determinations and principles underlying the
reversal or modification.
Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts;
scope of review.
1. Upon an appeal to an intermediate appellate court from a judgment,
sentence or order of a criminal court, such intermediate appellate court
may consider and determine any question of law or issue of fact
involving error or defect in the criminal court proceedings which may
have adversely affected the appellant.
2. Upon such an appeal, the intermediate appellate court must either
affirm or reverse or modify the criminal court judgment, sentence or
order. The ways in which it may modify a judgment include, but are not
limited to, the following:
(a) Upon a determination that the trial evidence adduced in support of
a verdict is not legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt
of an offense of which he was convicted but is legally sufficient to
establish his guilt of a lesser included offense, the court may modify
the judgment by changing it to one of conviction for the lesser offense;
(b) Upon a determination that the trial evidence is not legally
sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of all the offenses of
which he was convicted but is legally sufficient to establish his guilt
of one or more of such offenses, the court may modify the judgment by
reversing it with respect to the unsupported counts and otherwise
affirming it;
(c) Upon a determination that a sentence imposed upon a valid
conviction is illegal or unduly harsh or severe, the court may modify
the judgment by reversing it with respect to the sentence and by
otherwise affirming it.
3. A reversal or a modification of a judgment, sentence or order must
be based upon a determination made:
(a) Upon the law; or
(b) Upon the facts; or
(c) As a matter of discretion in the interest of justice; or
(d) Upon any two or all three of the bases specified in paragraphs
(a), (b) and (c).
4. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to
be upon the law include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) That a ruling or instruction of the court, duly protested by the
defendant, as prescribed in subdivision two of section 470.05, at a
trial resulting in a judgment, deprived the defendant of a fair trial;
(b) That evidence adduced at a trial resulting in a judgment was not
legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of an offense of
which he was convicted;
(c) That a sentence was unauthorized, illegally imposed or otherwise
invalid as a matter of law.
5. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to
be on the facts include, but are not limited to, a determination that a
verdict of conviction resulting in a judgment was, in whole or in part,
against the weight of the evidence.
6. The kinds of determinations of reversal or modification deemed to
be made as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice include,
but are not limited to, the following:
(a) That an error or defect occurring at a trial resulting in a
judgment, which error or defect was not duly protested at trial as
prescribed in subdivision two of section 470.05 so as to present a
question of law, deprived the defendant of a fair trial;
(b) That a sentence, though legal, was unduly harsh or severe.
Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts;
corrective action upon reversal or modification.
Upon reversing or modifying a judgment, sentence or order of a
criminal court, an intermediate appellate court must take or direct such
corrective action as is necessary and appropriate both to rectify any
injustice to the appellant resulting from the error or defect which is
the subject of the reversal or modification and to protect the rights of
the respondent. The particular corrective action to be taken or
directed is governed in part by the following rules:
1. Upon a reversal of a judgment after trial for error or defect
which resulted in prejudice to the defendant or deprived him of a fair
trial, the court must, whether such reversal be on the law or as a
matter of discretion in the interest of justice, order a new trial of
the accusatory instrument and remit the case to the criminal court for
such action.
2. Upon a reversal of a judgment after trial for legal insufficiency
of trial evidence, the court must dismiss the accusatory instrument.
3. Upon a modification of a judgment after trial for legal
insufficiency of trial evidence with respect to one or more but not all
of the offenses of which the defendant was convicted, the court must
dismiss the count or counts of the accusatory instrument determined to
be legally unsupported and must otherwise affirm the judgment. In such
case, it must either reduce the total sentence to that imposed by the
criminal court upon the counts with respect to which the judgment is
affirmed or remit the case to the criminal court for re-sentence upon
such counts; provided that nothing contained in this paragraph precludes
further sentence reduction in the exercise of the appellate court's
discretion pursuant to subdivision six.
4. Upon a modification of a judgment after trial which reduces a
conviction of a crime to one for a lesser included offense, the court
must remit the case to the criminal court with a direction that the
latter sentence the defendant accordingly.
5. Upon a reversal or modification of a judgment after trial upon the
ground that the verdict, either in its entirety or with respect to a
particular count or counts, is against the weight of the trial evidence,
the court must dismiss the accusatory instrument or any reversed count.
6. Upon modifying a judgment or reversing a sentence as a matter of
discretion in the interest of justice upon the ground that the sentence
is unduly harsh or severe, the court must itself impose some legally
authorized lesser sentence.
Determination of appeals by intermediate appellate courts;
form and content of order.
1. An order of an intermediate appellate court which affirms a
judgment, sentence or order of a criminal court need only state such
affirmance.
2. An order of an intermediate appellate court which reverses or
modifies a judgment, sentence or order of a criminal court must contain
the following:
(a) A statement of whether the determination was upon the law or upon
the facts or as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, or
upon any specified two or all three of such bases; and
(b) If the decision is rendered without opinion, a brief statement of
the specific grounds of the reversal or modification; and
(c) A statement of the corrective action taken or directed by the
court; and
(d) If the determination is exclusively upon the law, a statement of
whether or not the facts upon which the criminal court's judgment,
sentence or order is based have been considered and determined to have
been established. In the absence of such a statement, it is presumed
that the intermediate appellate court did not consider or make any
determination with respect to such facts.
Determination by court of appeals of appeals taken directly
thereto from judgments and orders of criminal courts.
1. Wherever appropriate, the rules set forth in sections 470.15 and
470.20, governing the consideration and determination by intermediate
appellate courts of appeals thereto from judgments and orders of
criminal courts, and prescribing their scope of review and the
corrective action to be taken by them upon reversal or modification,
apply equally to the consideration and determination by the court of
appeals of appeals taken directly thereto, pursuant to sections 450.70
and 450.80, from judgments and orders of superior criminal courts.
2. Whenever a sentence of death is imposed, the judgment and sentence
shall be reviewed on the record by the court of appeals. Review by the
court of appeals pursuant to subdivision one of section 450.70 may not
be waived.
3. With regard to the sentence, the court shall, in addition to
exercising the powers and scope of review granted under subdivision one
of this section, determine:
(a) whether the sentence of death was imposed under the influence of
passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary or legally impermissible
factor including whether the imposition of the verdict or sentence was
based upon the race of the defendant or a victim of the crime for which
the defendant was convicted;
(b) whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to
the penalty imposed in similar cases considering both the crime and the
defendant. In conducting such review the court, upon request of the
defendant, in addition to any other determination, shall review whether
the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty
imposed in similar cases by virtue of the race of the defendant or a
victim of the crime for which the defendant was convicted; and
(c) whether the decision to impose the sentence of death was against
the weight of the evidence.
4. The court shall include in its decision:
(a) the aggravating and mitigating factors established in the record
on appeal; and
(b) those similar cases it took into consideration.
5. In addition to exercising any other corrective action pursuant to
subdivision one of this section, the court, with regard to review of a
sentence of death, shall be authorized to:
(a) affirm the sentence of death; or
(b) set the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing
pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 400.27 for a
determination as to whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death,
life imprisonment without parole or to a term of imprisonment for the
class A-I felony of murder in the first degree other than a sentence of
life imprisonment without parole; or
(c) set the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing by the
court for a determination as to whether the defendant shall be sentenced
to life imprisonment without parole or to a term of imprisonment for the
class A-I felony of murder in the first degree other than a sentence of
life imprisonment without parole.
Determination by court of appeals of appeals from orders of
intermediate appellate courts; scope of review.
1. Upon an appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an
intermediate appellate court affirming a judgment, sentence or order of
a criminal court, the court of appeals may consider and determine not
only questions of law which were raised or considered upon the appeal to
the intermediate appellate court, but also any question of law involving
alleged error or defect in the criminal court proceedings resulting in
the original criminal court judgment, sentence or order, regardless of
whether such question was raised, considered or determined upon the
appeal to the intermediate appellate court.
2. Upon an appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an
intermediate appellate court reversing or modifying a judgment, sentence
or order of a criminal court, the court of appeals may consider and
determine:
(a) Any question of law which was determined by the intermediate
appellate court and which, as so determined, constituted a basis for
such court's order of reversal or modification; and
(b) Any other question of law involving alleged or possible error or
defect in the criminal court proceedings resulting in the original
judgment, sentence or order which may have adversely affected the party
who was appellant in the intermediate appellate court and who is
respondent in the court of appeals. The court of appeals is not
precluded from considering and determining such a question by the
circumstance that it was not considered or determined by the
intermediate appellate court, or that it did not constitute a basis for
such court's reversal or modification, or that the party who may have
been adversely affected thereby is the respondent rather than the
appellant in the court of appeals; and the court of appeals, even though
rejecting the intermediate appellate court's reasons for its order of
reversal or modification, may affirm or modify such order upon the basis
of such other questions; and
(c) Any question concerning the legality of the corrective action
taken by the intermediate appellate court.
3. Upon such an appeal, the court must affirm, reverse or modify the
intermediate appellate court order.
Determination by court of appeals of appeals from intermediate
appellate courts; corrective action upon reversal or
modification.
1. Upon reversing or modifying an order of an intermediate appellate
court affirming a criminal court judgment, sentence or order, the court
of appeals must take or direct such corrective action as the
intermediate appellate court would, pursuant to section 470.20, have
been required or authorized to take or direct had it reversed or
modified the criminal court judgment, sentence or order upon the same
ground or grounds.
2. Upon reversing an order of an intermediate appellate court
reversing or modifying a criminal court judgment, sentence or order upon
the ground that questions of law were erroneously determined by the
intermediate appellate court in favor of the party appellant therein,
the court of appeals must take or direct corrective action as follows:
(a) If the facts underlying the original criminal court judgment,
sentence or order were considered and determined to have been
established by the intermediate appellate court, the court of appeals
must reinstate and affirm the original criminal court judgment, sentence
or order and remit the case to such criminal court for whatever further
proceedings may be necessary to complete the action or proceedings
therein; provided, however, that where such facts were applied to an
erroneous determination of law, the court of appeals may remit the case
to the intermediate appellate court for a further determination of the
facts;
(b) If the facts underlying the original criminal court judgment,
sentence or order were not, or are presumed not to have been, considered
and determined by the intermediate appellate court, the court of appeals
must remit the case to such intermediate appellate court for
determination of the facts.
3. Upon modifying an intermediate appellate court order reversing or
modifying a criminal court judgment or order, upon the ground that
corrective action taken or directed by the intermediate appellate court
was illegal, the court of appeals must either (a) itself take or direct
the appropriate corrective action or (b) remit the case to the
intermediate appellate court for appropriate corrective action by the
latter.
Remission of case by appellate court to criminal court upon
reversal or modification of judgment; action by criminal
court.
Upon reversing or modifying a judgment and directing corrective
action, an appellate court must remit the case to the criminal court in
which the judgment was entered. Such criminal court must execute the
direction of the appellate court and must, depending upon the nature of
such direction, either discharge the defendant from custody, exonerate
his bail or issue a securing order.
Reargument of appeal; motion and criteria for.
1. After its determination of an appeal taken pursuant to article
four hundred fifty, an appellate court, in the interest of justice and
for good cause shown, may in its discretion, upon motion of a party
adversely affected by its determination, or upon its own motion, order a
reargument or reconsideration of the appeal. Upon such an order the
court may either direct further oral argument by the parties or confine
its reconsideration to re-examination of the issues as previously argued
or submitted upon the appeal proper. Upon ordering a reargument or
reconsideration of an appeal, the court must again determine the appeal
pursuant to the provisions of this article.
2. The court of appeals may promulgate rules limiting the time within
which a motion for reargument of appeals determined by such court may be
made, and the appellate division of each department may similarly
promulgate such rules with respect to appeals determined by such
appellate division and appeals determined by the other intermediate
appellate courts located within such department. In the absence of any
such rule of limitation, a motion for reargument may be made at any
time.
Status of accusatory instrument upon order of new trial or
restoration of action to pre-pleading status.
1. Upon a new trial of an accusatory instrument resulting from an
appellate court order reversing a judgment and ordering such new trial,
such accusatory instrument is deemed to contain all the counts and to
charge all the offenses which it contained and charged at the time the
previous trial was commenced, regardless of whether any count was
dismissed by the court in the course of such trial, except (a) those
upon or of which the defendant was acquitted or deemed to have been
acquitted, and (b) those dismissed upon appeal or upon some other
post-judgment order.
2. Upon an appellate court order which reverses a judgment based upon
a plea of guilty to an accusatory instrument or a part thereof, but
which does not dismiss the entire accusatory instrument, the criminal
action is, in the absence of express appellate court direction to the
contrary, restored to its pre-pleading status and the accusatory
instrument is deemed to contain all the counts and to charge all the
offenses which it contained and charged at the time of the entry of the
plea, except those dismissed upon appeal or upon some other
post-judgment order. Where the plea of guilty was entered and accepted,
pursuant to subdivision three of section 220.30, upon the condition that
it constituted a complete disposition and dismissal not only of the
accusatory instrument underlying the judgment reversed but also of one
or more other accusatory instruments against the defendant then pending
in the same court, the appellate court order of reversal completely
restores such other accusatory instruments; and such is the case even
where the order of reversal dismisses the entire accusatory instrument
underlying the judgment reversed.
Dismissal of appeal.
1. At any time after an appeal has been taken and before
determination thereof, the appellate court in which such appeal is
pending may, upon motion of the respondent or upon its own motion,
dismiss such appeal upon the ground of mootness, lack of jurisdiction to
determine it, failure of timely prosecution or perfection thereof, or
other substantial defect, irregularity or failure of action by the
appellant with respect to the prosecution or perfection of such appeal.
2. Such motion must be made upon reasonable notice to the appellant
and with opportunity to be heard. If the people are the appellant, such
notice must be served upon the appropriate district attorney either
personally or by ordinary mail. If the appellant is a defendant, such
notice must be served upon him by ordinary mail at his last known place
of residence or, if he is imprisoned, at the institution in which he is
confined, and similar notice must be served upon the attorney, if any,
who last appeared for him. Upon determination of the motion, a copy of
the order entered thereon must similarly be served.
3. Provided that a certificate granting leave to appeal is issued
pursuant to this subdivision, an appeal may be taken, in the manner
prescribed in subdivision four of section 460.10, to the court of
appeals from an order of an intermediate appellate court dismissing an
appeal thereto. Such appeal may be based either upon the ground that
the dismissal was invalid as a matter of law or upon the ground that it
constituted an abuse of discretion. A certificate granting leave to
appeal from such an order of dismissal may be issued only by a judge of
the court of appeals upon an application made in the manner prescribed
in paragraph (b) of subdivision three of section 460.20. Upon such an
appeal, the court of appeals must either affirm or reverse the
intermediate appellate court order.
PART 3 Special Proceedings and Miscellaneous Procedures
TITLE P Procedures For Securing Attendance At Criminal Actions and Proceedings of Defendants and Witnesses Under Control of Court--recognizance, Bail and Commitment
ARTICLE 500 Recognizance, Bail and Commitment--definitions of Terms
Recognizance, bail and commitment; definitions of terms.
As used in this title, and in this chapter generally, the following
terms have the following meanings:
1. "Principal" means a defendant in a criminal action or proceeding,
or a person adjudged a material witness therein, or any other person so
involved therein that the principal may by law be compelled to appear
before a court for the purpose of having such court exercise control
over the principal's person to secure the principal's future attendance
at the action or proceeding when required, and who in fact either is
before the court for such purpose or has been before it and been
subjected to such control.
2. "Release on own recognizance." A court releases a principal on the
principal's own recognizance when, having acquired control over the
principal's person, it permits the principal to be at liberty during the
pendency of the criminal action or proceeding involved upon condition
that the principal will appear thereat whenever the principal's
attendance may be required and will at all times render the principal
amenable to the orders and processes of the court.
3. "Fix bail." A court fixes bail when, having acquired control over
the person of a principal, it designates a sum of money and stipulates
that, if bail in such amount is posted on behalf of the principal and
approved, it will permit him to be at liberty during the pendency of the
criminal action or proceeding involved.
3-a. "Release under non-monetary conditions." A court releases a
principal under non-monetary conditions when, having acquired control
over a person, it authorizes the person to be at liberty during the
pendency of the criminal action or proceeding involved under conditions
ordered by the court. The conditions ordered shall reflect the findings
of the individualized determination warranting such imposition of
non-monetary conditions to reasonably assure the principal's return to
court and reasonably assure the principal's compliance with court
conditions. A principal shall not be required to pay for any part of the
cost of release on non-monetary conditions. Such conditions may include,
among other conditions reasonable under the circumstances:
(a) that the principal be in contact with a pretrial services agency
serving principals in that county;
(b) that the principal abide by reasonable, specified restrictions on
travel that are reasonably related to an actual risk of flight from the
jurisdiction, or that the principal surrender his or her passport;
(c) that the principal refrain from possessing a firearm, destructive
device or other dangerous weapon;
(d) that, upon a finding in accordance with subdivision four of
section 510.45 of this title, the person be placed in reasonable
pretrial supervision with a pretrial services agency serving principals
in that county, provided, however that where non-monetary conditions are
imposed in combination with a securing order also fixing bail, the court
shall not be required to make such separate finding;
(e) that the principal refrain from associating with certain persons
who are connected with the instant charge, including, when appropriate,
specified victims, witnesses, or co-defendants;
(f) that the principal be referred to a pretrial services agency for
placement in mandatory programming, including counseling, treatment,
including but not limited to mental health and chemical dependence
treatment, and intimate partner violence intervention programs. Where
applicable, the court may refer the principal to a crisis stabilization
center or direct that the principal be removed to a hospital pursuant to
section 9.43 of the mental hygiene law;
(g) that the principal make diligent efforts to maintain employment,
housing, or enrollment in school or educational programming;
(h) that the principal obey an order of protection issued by the
court, including an order issued pursuant to section 530.11 of this
title;
(i) that the principal obey conditions set by the court addressed to
the safety of a victim of a family offense as defined in section 530.11
of this title including conditions that may be requested by or on behalf
of the victim; and
(j) that, when it is shown pursuant to paragraph (a) of subdivision
four of section 510.40 of this title that no other realistic
non-monetary condition or set of non-monetary conditions will suffice to
reasonably assure the principal's return to court, the principal's
location be monitored with an approved electronic monitoring device, in
accordance with such subdivision four of section 510.40 of this title.
3-b. Subdivision three-a of this section presents a non-exclusive list
of conditions that may be considered and imposed by law, singularly or
in combination, when reasonable under the circumstances of the
defendant, the case, and the situation of the defendant. The court need
not necessarily order one or more specific conditions first before
ordering one or more or additional conditions.
3-c. (a) "Release for mental health assessment and evaluation." When a
principal appearing before the court appears, by clear and convincing
evidence, to be mentally ill at the present moment such that if left
unattended their conduct may result in harm to himself or herself or
others, the court may: order as a condition of release under supervision
that the principal seek a voluntary psychiatric assessment under section
9.13 of the mental hygiene law if the principal has a recently
documented history of mental illness or psychiatric hospitalization, and
the defense consents to the assessment.
(b) "Involuntary assessment pending release." When a principal
appearing before the court appears, by clear and convincing evidence, to
be mentally ill at the present moment such that if left unattended their
conduct may result in immediate serious harm to himself or herself or
others, the court may order as a condition of release under supervision
that the principal be taken by an entity, including but not limited to,
pretrial services agencies, or another qualified provider, to a local
hospital for immediate psychiatric assessment involuntarily under
section 9.43 of the mental hygiene law if the principal is conducting
himself or herself before the court, in such a manner which in a person
who is not mentally ill would be deemed disorderly conduct which is
likely to result in immediate serious harm to himself or herself or
others. The court is also authorized to request peace officers, when
acting pursuant to their special duties, or police officers, who are
members of an authorized police department or force or of a sheriff's
department, to take into custody and transport such person to a hospital
for determination by the director of community services when such person
qualifies for admission pursuant to this section. The court may
authorize an ambulance service, as defined by subdivision two of section
three thousand one of the public health law, to transport such person to
any hospital specified in subdivision (a) of section 9.39 of the mental
hygiene law or any comprehensive psychiatric emergency program specified
in subdivision (a) of section 9.40 of the mental hygiene law, that is
willing to receive such person. Upon removal, there shall be a
determination made by the director of such hospital or program whether
such person should be retained therein pursuant to section 9.39 of the
mental hygiene law. If the principal is hospitalized, at the time of
release the hospital shall complete a discharge plan with linkages to
community-based mental health treatment, including services that are
provided after the individual has stabilized, if applicable and other
community-based services as may be deemed necessary and appropriate and
notify pretrial services agencies and the defense counsel of the
person's discharge. Pretrial services agencies are responsible for
ensuring continuity of care for the principal in the community.
(c) "Pretrial services." Pretrial services agencies shall be required,
upon the request of the court to provide a summary of the assessment,
limited to necessary and relevant information relating to the
principal's completion of an assessment and evaluation, placement,
treatment, and discharge from the hospital solely for the purpose of
ensuring compliance with the conditions of release and in accordance
with any applicable state and federal confidentiality laws. Conditions
of release may not be revoked solely based on noncompliance with
treatment.
(d) "Confidential." Any clinical record produced as a part of the
assessment, services or treatment plans required pursuant to this
subdivision shall be considered confidential and shall not be considered
part of the public record, and access to such records shall be limited
in accordance with applicable federal and state privacy laws. Such
information shall not be used as part of the criminal proceeding and
shall be expunged upon the resolution of the case.
(e) "Referral." Courts shall refer the principal, where appropriate,
to a judicial diversion program as defined in section 216.00 of this
chapter or to any other appropriate treatment court.
4. "Commit to the custody of the sheriff." A court commits a principal
to the custody of the sheriff when, having acquired control over the
principal's person, it orders that the principal be confined in the
custody of the sheriff during the pendency of the criminal action or
proceeding involved.
5. "Securing order" means an order of a court committing a principal
to the custody of the sheriff or fixing bail, where authorized, or
releasing the principal on the principal's own recognizance or releasing
the principal under non-monetary conditions, or, as otherwise authorized
under this title, ordering non-monetary conditions in conjunction with
fixing bail.
6. "Order of recognizance or bail" means a securing order releasing a
principal on the principal's own recognizance or under non-monetary
conditions or, where authorized, fixing bail.
7. "Application for recognizance or bail" means an application by a
principal that the court, instead of committing the principal to or
retaining the principal in the custody of the sheriff, either release
the principal on the principal's own recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions, or, where authorized, fix bail.
8. "Post bail" means to deposit bail in the amount and form fixed by
the court, with the court or with some other authorized public servant
or agency.
9. "Bail" means cash bail, a bail bond or money paid with a credit
card.
10. "Cash bail" means a sum of money, in the amount designated in an
order fixing bail, posted by a principal or by another person on his
behalf with a court or other authorized public servant or agency, upon
the condition that such money will become forfeit to the people of the
state of New York if the principal does not comply with the directions
of a court requiring his attendance at the criminal action or proceeding
involved or does not otherwise render himself amenable to the orders and
processes of the court.
11. "Obligor" means a person who executes a bail bond on behalf of a
principal and thereby assumes the undertaking described therein. The
principal himself may be an obligor.
12. "Surety" means an obligor who is not a principal.
13. "Bail bond" means a written undertaking, executed by one or more
obligors, that the principal designated in such instrument will, while
at liberty as a result of an order fixing bail and of the posting of the
bail bond in satisfaction thereof, appear in a designated criminal
action or proceeding when his attendance is required and otherwise
render himself amenable to the orders and processes of the court, and
that in the event that he fails to do so the obligor or obligors will
pay to the people of the state of New York a specified sum of money, in
the amount designated in the order fixing bail.
14. "Appearance bond" means a bail bond in which the only obligor is
the principal.
15. "Surety bond" means a bail bond in which the obligor or obligors
consist of one or more sureties or of one or more sureties and the
principal.
16. "Insurance company bail bond" means a surety bond, executed in the
form prescribed by the superintendent of financial services, in which
the surety-obligor is a corporation licensed by the superintendent of
financial services to engage in the business of executing bail bonds.
17. "Secured bail bond" means a bail bond secured by either:
(a) Personal property which is not exempt from execution and which,
over and above all liabilities and encumbrances, has a value equal to or
greater than the total amount of the undertaking; or
(b) Real property having a value of at least twice the total amount of
the undertaking. For purposes of this paragraph, value of real property
is determined by either:
(i) dividing the last assessed value of such property by the last
given equalization rate or in a special assessing unit, as defined in
article eighteen of the real property tax law, the appropriate class
ratio established pursuant to section twelve hundred two of such law of
the assessing municipality wherein the property is situated and by
deducting from the resulting figure the total amount of any liens or
other encumbrances upon such property; or
(ii) the value of the property as indicated in a certified appraisal
report submitted by a state certified general real estate appraiser duly
licensed by the department of state as provided in section one hundred
sixty-j of the executive law, and by deducting from the appraised value
the total amount of any liens or other encumbrances upon such property.
A lien report issued by a title insurance company licensed under article
sixty-four of the insurance law, that guarantees the correctness of a
lien search conducted by it, shall be presumptive proof of liens upon
the property.
18. "Partially secured bail bond" means a bail bond secured only by a
deposit of a sum of money not exceeding ten percent of the total amount
of the undertaking.
19. "Unsecured bail bond" means a bail bond, other than an insurance
company bail bond, not secured by any deposit of or lien upon property.
20. "Court" includes, where appropriate, a judge authorized to act as
described in a particular statute, though not as a court.
21. "Qualifies for electronic monitoring," for purposes of subdivision
four of section 510.40 of this title, means a person charged with a
felony, a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, a misdemeanor defined
in article one hundred thirty of the penal law, a crime and the
circumstances of paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section 530.60 of
this title apply, or any misdemeanor where the defendant stands
previously convicted, within the past five years, of a violent felony
offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law. For the purposes
of this subdivision, in calculating such five year period, any period of
time during which the defendant was incarcerated for any reason between
the time of the commission of any such previous crime and the time of
commission of the present crime shall be excluded and such five year
period shall be extended by a period or periods equal to the time served
under such incarceration.
22. "Misdemeanor crime of domestic violence," for purposes of
subdivision twenty-one of this section, means a misdemeanor under the
penal law provisions and circumstances described in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this title.
ARTICLE 510 Recognizance, Bail and Commitment-- Determination of Application For Recognizance or Bail, Issuance of Securing Orders, and Related Matters
Securing order; when required; alternatives available; standard
to be applied.
The imposition of a specific type of securing order is in some cases
required by law and in other cases within the discretion of the court in
accordance with the principles of, and pursuant to its authority granted
under, this title.
1. When a principal, whose future court attendance at a criminal
action or proceeding is or may be required, comes under the control of a
court, such court shall impose a securing order in accordance with this
title. Except as otherwise required by law, the court shall make an
individualized determination as to whether the principal poses a risk of
flight to avoid prosecution, consider the kind and degree of control or
restriction necessary to reasonably assure the principal's return to
court, and select a securing order consistent with its determination
under this subdivision. The court shall explain the basis for its
determination and its choice of securing order on the record or in
writing. In making a determination under this subdivision, the court
must consider and take into account available information about the
principal, including:
(a) The principal's activities and history;
(b) If the principal is a defendant, the charges facing the principal;
(c) The principal's criminal conviction record if any;
(d) The principal's record of previous adjudication as a juvenile
delinquent, as retained pursuant to section 354.1 of the family court
act, or, of pending cases where fingerprints are retained pursuant to
section 306.1 of such act, or a youthful offender, if any;
(e) The principal's previous record with respect to flight to avoid
criminal prosecution;
(f) If monetary bail is authorized, according to the restrictions set
forth in this title, the principal's individual financial circumstances,
and, in cases where bail is authorized, the principal's ability to post
bail without posing undue hardship, as well as his or her ability to
obtain a secured, unsecured, or partially secured bond;
(g) Any violation by the principal of an order of protection issued by
any court;
(h) The principal's history of use or possession of a firearm;
(i) Whether the charge is alleged to have caused serious harm to an
individual or group of individuals; and
(j) If the principal is a defendant, in the case of an application for
a securing order pending appeal, the merit or lack of merit of the
appeal.
2. A principal is entitled to representation by counsel under this
chapter in preparing an application for release, when a securing order
is being considered and when a securing order is being reviewed for
modification, revocation or termination. If the principal is financially
unable to obtain counsel, counsel shall be assigned to the principal.
3. In cases other than as described in subdivision four of this
section, the court shall release the principal pending trial on the
principal's own recognizance, unless the court finds on the record or in
writing that release on the principal's own recognizance will not
reasonably assure the principal's return to court. In such instances,
the court shall release the principal under non-monetary conditions as
provided for in subdivision three-a of section 500.10 of this title that
will reasonably assure the principal's return to court. The court shall
explain its choice of securing order on the record or in writing.
4. Where the principal stands charged with a qualifying offense, the
court, unless otherwise prohibited by law, may in its discretion release
the principal pending trial on the principal's own recognizance or under
non-monetary conditions, fix bail, or order non-monetary conditions in
conjunction with fixing bail, or, where the defendant is charged with a
qualifying offense which is a felony, the court may commit the principal
to the custody of the sheriff. A principal stands charged with a
qualifying offense for the purposes of this subdivision when he or she
stands charged with:
(a) a felony enumerated in section 70.02 of the penal law, other than
robbery in the second degree as defined in subdivision one of section
160.10 of the penal law, provided, however, that burglary in the second
degree as defined in subdivision two of section 140.25 of the penal law
shall be a qualifying offense only where the defendant is charged with
entering the living area of the dwelling;
(b) a crime involving witness intimidation under section 215.15 of the
penal law;
(c) a crime involving witness tampering under section 215.11, 215.12
or 215.13 of the penal law;
(d) a class A felony defined in the penal law, provided that for class
A felonies under article two hundred twenty of the penal law, only class
A-I felonies shall be a qualifying offense;
(e) a sex trafficking offense defined in section 230.34 or 230.34-a of
the penal law, or a felony sex offense defined in section 70.80 of the
penal law, or a crime involving incest as defined in section 255.25,
255.26 or 255.27 of such law, or a misdemeanor defined in article one
hundred thirty of such law;
(f) conspiracy in the second degree as defined in section 105.15 of
the penal law, where the underlying allegation of such charge is that
the defendant conspired to commit a class A felony defined in article
one hundred twenty-five of the penal law;
(g) money laundering in support of terrorism in the first degree as
defined in section 470.24 of the penal law; money laundering in support
of terrorism in the second degree as defined in section 470.23 of the
penal law; money laundering in support of terrorism in the third degree
as defined in section 470.22 of the penal law; money laundering in
support of terrorism in the fourth degree as defined in section 470.21
of the penal law; or a felony crime of terrorism as defined in article
four hundred ninety of the penal law, other than the crime defined in
section 490.20 of such law;
(h) criminal contempt in the second degree as defined in subdivision
three of section 215.50 of the penal law, criminal contempt in the first
degree as defined in subdivision (b), (c) or (d) of section 215.51 of
the penal law or aggravated criminal contempt as defined in section
215.52 of the penal law, and the underlying allegation of such charge of
criminal contempt in the second degree, criminal contempt in the first
degree or aggravated criminal contempt is that the defendant violated a
duly served order of protection where the protected party is a member of
the defendant's same family or household as defined in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of this title;
(i) facilitating a sexual performance by a child with a controlled
substance or alcohol as defined in section 263.30 of the penal law, use
of a child in a sexual performance as defined in section 263.05 of the
penal law or luring a child as defined in subdivision one of section
120.70 of the penal law, promoting an obscene sexual performance by a
child as defined in section 263.10 of the penal law or promoting a
sexual performance by a child as defined in section 263.15 of the penal
law;
(j) any crime that is alleged to have caused the death of another
person;
(k) criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation as defined
in section 121.11 of the penal law, strangulation in the second degree
as defined in section 121.12 of the penal law or unlawful imprisonment
in the first degree as defined in section 135.10 of the penal law, and
is alleged to have committed the offense against a member of the
defendant's same family or household as defined in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this title;
(l) aggravated vehicular assault as defined in section 120.04-a of the
penal law or vehicular assault in the first degree as defined in section
120.04 of the penal law;
(m) assault in the third degree as defined in section 120.00 of the
penal law or arson in the third degree as defined in section 150.10 of
the penal law, when such crime is charged as a hate crime as defined in
section 485.05 of the penal law;
(n) aggravated assault upon a person less than eleven years old as
defined in section 120.12 of the penal law or criminal possession of a
weapon on school grounds as defined in section 265.01-a of the penal
law;
(o) grand larceny in the first degree as defined in section 155.42 of
the penal law, enterprise corruption as defined in section 460.20 of the
penal law, or money laundering in the first degree as defined in section
470.20 of the penal law;
(p) failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to section one
hundred sixty-eight-t of the correction law or endangering the welfare
of a child as defined in subdivision one of section 260.10 of the penal
law, where the defendant is required to maintain registration under
article six-C of the correction law and designated a level three
offender pursuant to subdivision six of section one hundred
sixty-eight-l of the correction law;
(q) a crime involving bail jumping under section 215.55, 215.56 or
215.57 of the penal law, or a crime involving escaping from custody
under section 205.05, 205.10 or 205.15 of the penal law;
(r) any felony offense committed by the principal while serving a
sentence of probation or while released to post release supervision;
(s) a felony, where the defendant qualifies for sentencing on such
charge as a persistent felony offender pursuant to section 70.10 of the
penal law;
(t) any felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an
identifiable person or property, or any charge of criminal possession of
a firearm as defined in section 265.01-b of the penal law, where such
charge arose from conduct occurring while the defendant was released on
his or her own recognizance, released under conditions, or had yet to be
arraigned after the issuance of a desk appearance ticket for a separate
felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an identifiable person
or property, or any charge of criminal possession of a firearm as
defined in section 265.01-b of the penal law, provided, however, that
the prosecutor must show reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed the instant crime and any underlying crime. For the purposes
of this subparagraph, any of the underlying crimes need not be a
qualifying offense as defined in this subdivision. For the purposes of
this paragraph, "harm to an identifiable person or property" shall
include but not be limited to theft of or damage to property. However,
based upon a review of the facts alleged in the accusatory instrument,
if the court determines that such theft is negligible and does not
appear to be in furtherance of other criminal activity, the principal
shall be released on his or her own recognizance or under appropriate
non-monetary conditions; or
(u) criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined in
subdivision three of section 265.02 of the penal law or criminal sale of
a firearm to a minor as defined in section 265.16 of the penal law.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions three and four of
this section, with respect to any charge for which bail or remand is not
ordered, and for which the court would not or could not otherwise
require bail or remand, a defendant may, at any time, request that the
court set bail in a nominal amount requested by the defendant in the
form specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 520.10 of
this title; if the court is satisfied that the request is voluntary, the
court shall set such bail in such amount.
6. When a securing order is revoked or otherwise terminated in the
course of an uncompleted action or proceeding but the principal's future
court attendance still is or may be required and the principal is still
under the control of a court, a new securing order must be issued. When
the court revokes or otherwise terminates a securing order which
committed the principal to the custody of the sheriff, the court shall
give written notification to the sheriff of such revocation or
termination of the securing order.
Commitment of principal under seventeen or eighteen.
1. When a principal who is under the age of sixteen is committed to
the custody of the sheriff the court must direct that the principal be
taken to and lodged in a place certified by the office of children and
family services as a juvenile detention facility for the reception of
children. When a principal who (a) commencing October first, two
thousand eighteen, is sixteen years of age; or (b) commencing October
first, two thousand nineteen, is sixteen or seventeen years of age, is
committed to the custody of the sheriff, the court must direct that the
principal be taken to and lodged in a place certified by the office of
children and family services in conjunction with the state commission of
correction as a specialized secure juvenile detention facility for older
youth. Where such a direction is made the sheriff shall deliver the
principal in accordance therewith and such person shall although lodged
and cared for in a juvenile detention facility continue to be deemed to
be in the custody of the sheriff. No principal under the age specified
to whom the provisions of this section may apply shall be detained in
any prison, jail, lockup, or other place used for adults convicted of a
crime or under arrest and charged with the commission of a crime without
the approval of the office of children and family services which shall
consult with the commission of correction if the principal is sixteen
years of age or older in the case of each principal and the statement of
its reasons therefor; nor shall a principal under the age specified who
is charged solely with a violation as defined in subdivision three of
section 10.00 of the penal law be subject to detention. The sheriff
shall not be liable for any acts done to or by such principal resulting
from negligence in the detention of and care for such principal, when
the principal is not in the actual custody of the sheriff.
2. Except upon consent of the defendant or for good cause shown, in
any case in which a new securing order is issued for a principal
previously committed to the custody of the sheriff pursuant to this
section, such order shall further direct the sheriff to deliver the
principal from a juvenile detention facility to the person or place
specified in the order.
Application for a change in securing order.
1. Upon any occasion when a court has issued a securing order with
respect to a principal and the principal is confined in the custody of
the sheriff as a result of the securing order or a previously issued
securing order, the principal may make an application for recognizance,
release under non-monetary conditions, bail, a reduction of bail, or
imposition of non-monetary conditions in conjunction with bail or a
reduction of bail.
2. (a) The principal is entitled to representation by counsel in the
making and presentation of such application. If the principal is
financially unable to obtain counsel, counsel shall be assigned to the
principal.
(b) Upon such application, the principal must be accorded an
opportunity to be heard, present evidence and to contend that an order
of recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or, where
authorized, bail, a reduction of bail, or imposition of non-monetary
conditions in conjunction with bail or a reduction of bail, must or
should issue, that the court should release the principal on the
principal's own recognizance or under non-monetary conditions rather
than fix bail, or where bail has been imposed, reduce the amount of bail
and impose non-monetary conditions, where authorized under this title,
and that if bail is authorized and fixed it should be in a suggested
amount and form.
3. When an application for a change in securing order is brought under
this section and one or more of the charge or charges on which such
securing order was based have been dismissed and/or reduced such that
the securing order is no longer supported by the provisions of section
510.10 of this article, the court shall impose a new securing order in
accordance with such section.
Application for securing order; rules of law and criteria
controlling determination.
1. With respect to any principal, the court in all cases, unless
otherwise provided by law, must impose a securing order in accordance
with section 510.10 of this article, and shall explain the basis for its
determination and choice of securing order on the record or in writing.
2. Where the principal is a defendant-appellant in a pending appeal
from a judgment of conviction, the court must also consider the
likelihood of ultimate reversal of the judgment. A determination that
the appeal is palpably without merit alone justifies, but does not
require, a denial of the application, regardless of any determination
made with respect to the factors specified in subdivision one of this
section.
3. When bail or recognizance is ordered, the court shall inform the
principal, if the principal is a defendant charged with the commission
of a felony, that the release is conditional and that the court may
revoke the order of release and may be authorized to commit the
principal to the custody of the sheriff in accordance with the
provisions of subdivision two of section 530.60 of this chapter if the
principal commits a subsequent felony while at liberty upon such order.
Court notification to principal of conditions of release and of
alleged violations of conditions of release.
1. Upon ordering that a principal be released on the principal's own
recognizance, or released under non-monetary conditions, or, if bail has
been fixed, upon the posting of bail, the court must direct the
principal to appear in the criminal action or proceeding involved
whenever the principal's attendance may be required and to be at all
times amenable to the orders and processes of the court. If such
principal is in the custody of the sheriff or at liberty upon bail at
the time of the order, the court must direct that the principal be
discharged from such custody or, as the case may be, that the
principal's bail be exonerated.
2. Upon the issuance of an order fixing bail, where authorized, and
upon the posting thereof, the court must examine the bail to determine
whether it complies with the order. If it does, the court must, in the
absence of some factor or circumstance which in law requires or
authorizes disapproval thereof, approve the bail and must issue a
certificate of release, authorizing the principal to be at liberty, and,
if the principal is in the custody of the sheriff at the time, directing
the sheriff to discharge the principal therefrom. If the bail fixed is
not posted, or is not approved after being posted, the court must order
that the principal be committed to the custody of the sheriff. In the
event of any such non-approval, the court shall explain promptly in
writing the reasons therefor.
3. Non-monetary conditions of release shall be individualized and
established in writing by the court. At future court appearances, the
court shall consider a lessening of conditions or modification of
conditions to a less burdensome form based on the principal's compliance
with such conditions of release. In the event of alleged non-compliance
with the conditions of release in an important respect, pursuant to this
subdivision, additional conditions may be imposed by the court, on the
record or in writing, only after notice of the facts and circumstances
of such alleged non-compliance, reasonable under the circumstances,
affording the principal and the principal's attorney and the people an
opportunity to present relevant, admissible evidence, relevant witnesses
and to cross-examine witnesses, and a finding by clear and convincing
evidence that the principal violated a condition of release in an
important respect. Following such a finding, in determining whether to
impose additional conditions for non-compliance, the court shall
consider and may select conditions as provided for in subdivision
three-a of section 500.10 of this title that will reasonably assure the
defendant's return to court. The court shall explain on the record or in
writing the reasons for its determination and for any changes to the
conditions imposed.
4. (a) Electronic monitoring of a principal's location may be ordered
only if the court finds, after notice, an opportunity to be heard and an
individualized determination explained on the record or in writing, that
the defendant qualifies for electronic monitoring in accordance with
subdivision twenty-one of section 500.10 of this title, and no other
realistic non-monetary condition or set of non-monetary conditions will
suffice to reasonably assure a principal's return to court.
(b) The specific method of electronic monitoring of the principal's
location must be approved by the court. The procedure and method of such
electronic monitoring shall reflect the findings of the individualized
determination warranting such imposition of electronic monitoring to
reasonably assure the principal's return to court, and shall be
unobtrusive to the greatest extent practicable.
(c) Electronic monitoring of the location of a principal may be
conducted only by a public entity under the supervision and control of a
county or municipality or a non-profit entity under contract to the
county, municipality or the state. A county or municipality shall be
authorized to enter into a contract with another county or municipality
in the state to monitor principals under non-monetary conditions of
release in its county, but counties, municipalities and the state shall
not contract with any private for-profit entity for such purposes.
Counties, municipalities and the state may contract with a private
for-profit entity to supply electronic monitoring devices or other
items, provided that any interaction with persons under electronic
monitoring or the data produced by such monitoring shall be conducted
solely by employees of a county, municipality, the state, or a
non-profit entity under contract with such county, municipality or the
state.
(d) Electronic monitoring of a principal's location may be for a
maximum period of sixty days, and may be renewed for such period, after
notice, an opportunity to be heard and a de novo, individualized
determination in accordance with this subdivision, which shall be
explained on the record or in writing.
A defendant subject to electronic location monitoring under this
subdivision shall be considered held or confined in custody for purposes
of section 180.80 of this chapter and shall be considered committed to
the custody of the sheriff for purposes of section 170.70 of the
chapter, as applicable.
5. If a principal is released under non-monetary conditions, the court
shall, on the record and in an individualized written document provided
to the principal, notify the principal, in plain language and a manner
sufficiently clear and specific:
(a) of any conditions to which the principal is subject, to serve as a
guide for the principal's conduct; and
(b) that the possible consequences for violation of such a condition
may include revocation of the securing order and the ordering of a more
restrictive securing order.
Court appearances: additional notifications.
1. The court or, upon direction of the court, a certified pretrial
services agency, shall notify all principals released under non-monetary
conditions and on recognizance of all court appearances in advance by
text message, telephone call, electronic mail or first class mail. The
chief administrator of the courts shall, pursuant to subdivision one of
section 10.40 of this chapter, develop a form which shall be offered to
the principal at court appearances. On such form, which upon completion
shall be retained in the court file, the principal may select one such
preferred manner of notice.
2. Such form may request the information necessary for the defendant
to be provided with notice in accordance with such single, selected
manner of notice. After notice of such consequence, a defendant who
intentionally declines to provide the information necessary for the
defendant to be provided with such notice pursuant to this section shall
forfeit the opportunity to receive such notice until such information is
timely provided. Any failure by the court or certified pretrial services
agency to provide notice of a scheduled court appearance in the manner
provided in this section shall not in and of itself constitute grounds
or authorization for the defendant to fail to appear for such scheduled
court appearance.
Pretrial services agencies.
1. The office of court administration shall certify and regularly
review for recertification one or more pretrial services agencies in
each county to monitor principals released under non-monetary
conditions. Such office shall maintain a listing on its public website
identifying by county each pretrial services agency so certified in the
state.
2. Every such agency shall be a public entity under the supervision
and control of a county or municipality or a non-profit entity under
contract to the county, municipality or the state. A county or
municipality shall be authorized to enter into a contract with another
county or municipality in the state to monitor principals under
non-monetary conditions of release in its county, but counties,
municipalities and the state shall not contract with any private
for-profit entity for such purposes.
3. (a) Any questionnaire, instrument or tool used with a principal in
the process of considering or determining the principal's possible
release on recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or on
bail, or used with a principal in the process of considering or
determining a condition or conditions of release or monitoring by a
pretrial services agency, shall be promptly made available to the
principal and the principal's counsel upon written request. Any such
blank form questionnaire, instrument or tool regularly used in the
county for such purpose or a related purpose shall be made available to
any person promptly upon request.
(b) Any such questionnaire, instrument or tool used to inform
determinations on release or conditions of release shall be:
(i) designed and implemented in a way that ensures the results are
free from discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, or
any other protected class; and
(ii) empirically validated and regularly revalidated, with such
validation and revalidation studies and all underlying data, except
personal identifying information for any defendant, publicly available
upon request.
4. Supervision by a pre-trial services agency may be ordered as a
non-monetary condition pursuant to this title only if the court finds,
after notice, an opportunity to be heard and an individualized
determination explained on the record or in writing, that no other
realistic non-monetary condition or set of non-monetary conditions will
suffice to reasonably assure the principal's return to court.
5. Each pretrial service agency certified by the office of court
administration pursuant to this section shall at the end of each year
prepare and file with such office an annual report, which the office
shall compile, publish on its website and make available upon request to
members of the public. Such reports shall not include any personal
identifying information for any individual defendants. Each such report,
in addition to other relevant information, shall set forth,
disaggregated by each county served:
(a) the number of defendants supervised by the agency;
(b) the length of time (in months) each such person was supervised by
the agency prior to acquittal, dismissal, release on recognizance,
revocation of release on conditions, and sentencing;
(c) the race, ethnicity, age and sex of each person supervised;
(d) the crimes with which each person supervised was charged;
(e) the number of persons supervised for whom release conditions were
modified by the court, describing generally for each person or group of
persons the type and nature of the condition or conditions added or
removed;
(f) the number of persons supervised for whom release under conditions
was revoked by the court, and the basis for such revocations; and
(g) the court disposition in each supervised case, including
sentencing information.
Enforcement of securing order.
1. When the attendance of a principal confined in the custody of the
sheriff is required at the criminal action or proceeding at a particular
time and place, the court may compel such attendance by directing the
sheriff to produce the principal at such time and place. If the
principal is at liberty on the principal's own recognizance or
non-monetary conditions or on bail, the principal's attendance may be
achieved or compelled by various methods, including notification and the
issuance of a bench warrant, prescribed by law in provisions governing
such matters with respect to the particular kind of action or proceeding
involved.
2. Except when the principal is charged with a new crime while at
liberty, absent relevant, credible evidence demonstrating that a
principal's failure to appear for a scheduled court appearance was
willful, the court, prior to issuing a bench warrant for a failure to
appear for a scheduled court appearance, shall provide at least
forty-eight hours notice to the principal or the principal's counsel
that the principal is required to appear, in order to give the principal
an opportunity to appear voluntarily.
ARTICLE 520 Bail and Bail Bonds
Bail and bail bonds; fixing of bail and authorized forms
thereof.
1. The only authorized forms of bail are the following:
(a) Cash bail.
(b) An insurance company bail bond.
(c) A secured surety bond.
(d) A secured appearance bond.
(e) A partially secured surety bond.
(f) A partially secured appearance bond.
(g) An unsecured surety bond.
(h) An unsecured appearance bond.
(i) Credit card or similar device; provided, however, that
notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person posting bail by
credit card or similar device also may be required to pay a reasonable
administrative fee. The amount of such administrative fee and the time
and manner of its payment shall be in accordance with the system
established pursuant to subdivision four of section 150.30 of this
chapter or paragraph (j) of subdivision two of section two hundred
twelve of the judiciary law, as appropriate.
2. The methods of fixing bail are as follows:
(a) A court may designate the amount of the bail without designating
the form or forms in which it may be posted. In such case, the bail may
be posted in either of the forms specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of
subdivision one;
(b) The court shall direct that the bail be posted in any one of three
or more of the forms specified in subdivision one of this section,
designated in the alternative, and may designate different amounts
varying with the forms, except that one of the forms shall be either an
unsecured or partially secured surety bond, as selected by the court.
Bail and bail bonds; posting of cash bail.
1. Where a court has fixed bail pursuant to subdivision two of section
520.10, at any time after the principal has been committed to the
custody of the sheriff pending the posting thereof, cash bail in the
amount designated in the order fixing bail may be posted even though
such bail was not specified in such order. Cash bail may be deposited
with (a) the county treasurer of the county in which the criminal action
or proceeding is pending or, in the city of New York with the
commissioner of finance, or (b) the court which issued such order, or
(c) the sheriff in whose custody the principal has been committed. Upon
proof of the deposit of the designated amount the principal must be
forthwith released from custody.
2. The person posting cash bail must complete and sign a form which
states (a) the name, residential address and occupation of each person
posting cash bail; and (b) the title of the criminal action or
proceeding involved; and (c) the offense or offenses which are the
subjects of the action or proceeding involved, and the status of such
action or proceeding; and (d) the name of the principal and the nature
of his involvement in or connection with such action or proceeding; and
(e) that the person or persons posting cash bail undertake that the
principal will appear in such action or proceeding whenever required and
will at all times render himself amenable to the orders and processes of
the court; and (f) the date of the principal's next appearance in court;
and (g) an acknowledgement that the cash bail will be forfeited if the
principal does not comply with any requirement or order of process to
appear in court; and (h) the amount of money posted as cash bail.
3. Money posted as cash bail is and shall remain the property of the
person posting it unless forfeited to the court.
Bail and bail bonds; posting of bail bond and justifying
affidavits; form and contents thereof.
1. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) when a bail bond is to be
posted in satisfaction of bail, the obligor or obligors must submit to
the court a bail bond in the amount fixed, executed in the form
prescribed in subdivision two, accompanied by a justifying affidavit of
each obligor, executed in the form prescribed in subdivision four.
(b) When a bail bond is to be posted in satisfaction of bail fixed for
a defendant charged by information or simplified information or
prosecutor's information with one or more traffic infractions and no
other offense, the defendant may submit to the court, with the consent
of the court, an insurance company bail bond covering the amount fixed,
executed in a form prescribed by the superintendent of financial
services.
2. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of subdivision one, a bail bond
must be subscribed and sworn to by each obligor and must state:
(a) The name, residential address and occupation of each obligor; and
(b) The title of the criminal action or proceeding involved; and
(c) The offense or offenses which are the subjects of the action or
proceeding involved, and the status of such action or proceeding; and
(d) The name of the principal and the nature of his involvement in or
connection with such action or proceeding; and
(e) That the obligor, or the obligors jointly and severally, undertake
that the principal will appear in such action or proceeding whenever
required and will at all times render himself amenable to the orders and
processes of the court; and
(f) That in the event that the principal does not comply with any such
requirement, order or process, such obligor or obligors will pay to the
people of the state of New York a designated sum of money fixed by the
court.
3. A bail bond posted in the course of a criminal action is effective
and binding upon the obligor or obligors until the imposition of
sentence or other termination of the action, regardless of whether the
action is dismissed in the local criminal court after an indictment on
the same charge or charges by a superior court, and regardless of
whether such action is partially conducted or prosecuted in a court or
courts other than the one in which the action was pending when such bond
was posted, unless prior to such termination such order of bail is
vacated or revoked or the principal is surrendered, or unless the terms
of such bond expressly limit its effectiveness to a lesser period;
provided, however, the effectiveness of such bond may only be limited to
a lesser period if the obligor or obligors submit notice of the
limitation to the court and the district attorney not less than fourteen
days before effectiveness ends.
4. A justifying affidavit must be subscribed and sworn to by the
obligor-affiant and must state his name, residential address and
occupation. Depending upon the kind of bail bond which it justifies,
such affidavit must contain further statements as follows:
(a) An affidavit justifying an insurance company bail bond must state:
(i) The amount of the premium paid to the obligor; and
(ii) All security and all promises of indemnity received by the
surety-obligor in connection with its execution of the bond, and the
name, occupation and residential and business addresses of every person
who has given any such indemnifying security or promise.
An action by the surety-obligor against an indemnitor, seeking
retention of security deposited by the latter with the former or
enforcement of any indemnity agreement of a kind described in this
sub-paragraph, will not lie except with respect to agreements and
security specified in the justifying affidavit.
(b) An affidavit justifying a secured bail bond must state every item
of personal property deposited and of real property pledged as security,
the value of each such item, and the nature and amount of every lien or
encumbrance thereon.
(c) An affidavit justifying a partially secured bail bond or an
unsecured bail bond must state the place and nature of the
obligor-affiant's business or employment, the length of time he has been
engaged therein, his income during the past year, and his average income
over the past five years.
Bail and bail bonds; examination as to sufficiency.
1. Following the posting of a bail bond and the justifying affidavit
or affidavits or the posting of cash bail, the court may conduct an
inquiry for the purpose of determining the reliability of the obligors
or person posting cash bail, the value and sufficiency of any security
offered, and whether any feature of the undertaking contravenes public
policy; provided that before undertaking an inquiry, of a person posting
cash bail the court, after application of the district attorney, must
have had reasonable cause to believe that the person posting cash bail
is not in rightful possession of money posted as cash bail or that such
money constitutes the fruits of criminal or unlawful conduct. The court
may inquire into any matter stated or required to be stated in the
justifying affidavits, and may also inquire into other matters
appropriate to the determination, which include but are not limited to
the following:
(a) The background, character and reputation of any obligor, and, in
the case of an insurance company bail bond, the qualifications of the
surety-obligor and its executing agent; and
(b) The source of any money or property deposited by any obligor as
security, and whether any such money or property constitutes the fruits
of criminal or unlawful conduct; and
(c) The source of any money or property delivered or agreed to be
delivered to any obligor as indemnification on the bond, and whether any
such money or property constitutes the fruits of criminal or unlawful
conduct; and
(d) The background, character and reputation of any person who has
indemnified or agreed to indemnify an obligor upon the bond; and whether
any such indemnitor, not being licensed by the superintendent of
financial services in accordance with the insurance law, has within a
period of one month prior to such indemnity transaction given
indemnification or security for like purpose in more than two cases not
arising out of the same transaction; and
(e) The source of any money posted as cash bail, and whether any such
money constitutes the fruits of criminal or unlawful conduct;
(f) The background, character and reputation of the person posting
cash bail.
2. Upon such inquiry, the court may examine, under oath or otherwise,
the obligors and any other persons who may possess material information.
The district attorney has a right to attend such inquiry, to call
witnesses and to examine any witness in the proceeding. The court may,
upon application of the district attorney, adjourn the proceeding for a
reasonable period to allow him to investigate the matter.
3. At the conclusion of the inquiry, the court must issue an order
either approving or disapproving the bail.
Transfer of cash bail from local criminal court to superior
court.
When a local criminal court acquires control over the person of an
accused and such court designates the amount of bail that the accused
may post and such bail is posted in cash and subsequently the accused is
arraigned in superior court where bail is fixed by such court, the
accused may request that the cash bail posted in the local criminal
court be transferred to the superior court. Notice of such request must
be given to the person who posted cash bail. Upon such a request the
superior court shall make an order directing the local criminal court to
transfer the cash bail that it holds to the superior court for use in
the superior court. If there is an overage, the superior court shall
order it be paid over to the person who posted the cash bail in the
local criminal court. If there is a deficiency, the accused shall post
additional bail as directed by the superior court.
ARTICLE 530 Orders of Recognizance or Bail With Respect to Defendants In Criminal Actions and Proceedings--when and By What Courts Authorized
Order of recognizance release under non-monetary conditions or
bail; in general.
Under circumstances prescribed in this article, a court, upon
application of a defendant charged with or convicted of an offense, is
required to issue a securing order for such defendant during the
pendency of either:
1. A criminal action based upon such charge; or
2. An appeal taken by the defendant from a judgment of conviction or a
sentence or from an order of an intermediate appellate court affirming
or modifying a judgment of conviction or a sentence.
Procedures for family offense matters.
1. Jurisdiction. The family court and the criminal courts shall have
concurrent jurisdiction over any proceeding concerning acts which would
constitute disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
an intimate image, harassment in the first degree, harassment in the
second degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree, sexual
misconduct, forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, sexual
abuse in the second degree as set forth in subdivision one of section
130.60 of the penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the
second degree, stalking in the third degree, stalking in the fourth
degree, criminal mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in
the third degree, reckless endangerment, strangulation in the first
degree, strangulation in the second degree, criminal obstruction of
breathing or blood circulation, assault in the second degree, assault in
the third degree, an attempted assault, identity theft in the first
degree, identity theft in the second degree, identity theft in the third
degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third
degree, coercion in the second degree or coercion in the third degree as
set forth in subdivisions one, two and three of section 135.60 of the
penal law between spouses or former spouses, or between parent and child
or between members of the same family or household except that if the
respondent would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant
to section 30.00 of the penal law, then the family court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction over such proceeding. Notwithstanding a
complainant's election to proceed in family court, the criminal court
shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense
proceeding pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section,
"disorderly conduct" includes disorderly conduct not in a public place.
For purposes of this section, "members of the same family or household"
with respect to a proceeding in the criminal courts shall mean the
following:
(a) persons related by consanguinity or affinity;
(b) persons legally married to one another;
(c) persons formerly married to one another regardless of whether they
still reside in the same household;
(d) persons who have a child in common, regardless of whether such
persons have been married or have lived together at any time;
(e) persons who are not related by consanguinity or affinity and who
are or have been in an intimate relationship regardless of whether such
persons have lived together at any time. Factors the court may consider
in determining whether a relationship is an "intimate relationship"
include but are not limited to: the nature or type of relationship,
regardless of whether the relationship is sexual in nature; the
frequency of interaction between the persons; and the duration of the
relationship. Neither a casual acquaintance nor ordinary fraternization
between two individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed
to constitute an "intimate relationship"; and
(f) persons who are related by consanguinity or affinity to parties
who are or have been in an intimate relationship as defined in paragraph
(e) of this subdivision.
2. Information to petitioner or complainant. The chief administrator
of the courts shall designate the appropriate probation officers,
warrant officers, sheriffs, police officers, district attorneys or any
other law enforcement officials, to inform any petitioner or complainant
bringing a proceeding under this section before such proceeding is
commenced, of the procedures available for the institution of family
offense proceedings, including but not limited to the following:
(a) That there is concurrent jurisdiction with respect to family
offenses in both family court and the criminal courts;
(b) That a family court proceeding is a civil proceeding and is for
the purpose of attempting to stop the violence, end family disruption
and obtain protection. That referrals for counseling, or counseling
services, are available through probation for this purpose;
(c) That a proceeding in the criminal courts is for the purpose of
prosecution of the offender and can result in a criminal conviction of
the offender;
(d) That a proceeding or action subject to the provisions of this
section is initiated at the time of the filing of an accusatory
instrument or family court petition, not at the time of arrest, or
request for arrest, if any;
(f) That an arrest may precede the commencement of a family court or a
criminal court proceeding, but an arrest is not a requirement for
commencing either proceeding.
(h) At such time as the complainant first appears before the court on
a complaint or information, the court shall advise the complainant that
the complainant may: continue with the proceeding in criminal court; or
have the allegations contained therein heard in a family court
proceeding; or proceed concurrently in both criminal and family court.
Notwithstanding a complainant's election to proceed in family court, the
criminal court shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family
offense proceeding pursuant to this section;
(i) Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit or restrict complainant's
rights to proceed directly and without court referral in either a
criminal or family court, or both, as provided for in section one
hundred fifteen of the family court act and section 100.07 of this
chapter;
2-a. Upon the filing of an accusatory instrument charging a crime or
violation described in subdivision one of this section between members
of the same family or household, as such terms are defined in this
section, or as soon as the complainant first appears before the court,
whichever is sooner, the court shall advise the complainant of the right
to proceed in both the criminal and family courts, pursuant to section
100.07 of this chapter.
3. Official responsibility. No official or other person designated
pursuant to subdivision two of this section shall discourage or prevent
any person who wishes to file a petition or sign a complaint from having
access to any court for that purpose.
4. When a person is arrested for an alleged family offense or an
alleged violation of an order of protection or temporary order of
protection or arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the supreme or
family court, and the supreme or family court, as applicable, is not in
session, such person shall be brought before a local criminal court in
the county of arrest or in the county in which such warrant is
returnable pursuant to article one hundred twenty of this chapter. Such
local criminal court may issue any order authorized under subdivision
eleven of section 530.12 of this article, section one hundred
fifty-four-d or one hundred fifty-five of the family court act or
subdivision three-b of section two hundred forty or subdivision two-a of
section two hundred fifty-two of the domestic relations law, in addition
to discharging other arraignment responsibilities as set forth in this
chapter. In making such order, the local criminal court shall consider
de novo the recommendation and securing order, if any, made by the
supreme or family court as indicated on the warrant or certificate of
warrant. Unless the petitioner or complainant requests otherwise, the
court, in addition to scheduling further criminal proceedings, if any,
regarding such alleged family offense or violation allegation, shall
make such matter returnable in the supreme or family court, as
applicable, on the next day such court is in session.
5. Filing and enforcement of out-of-state orders of protection. A
valid order of protection or temporary order of protection issued by a
court of competent jurisdiction in another state, territorial or tribal
jurisdiction shall be accorded full faith and credit and enforced as if
it were issued by a court within the state for as long as the order
remains in effect in the issuing jurisdiction in accordance with
sections two thousand two hundred sixty-five and two thousand two
hundred sixty-six of title eighteen of the United States Code.
(a) An order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction in another
state, territorial or tribal jurisdiction shall be deemed valid if:
(i) the issuing court had personal jurisdiction over the parties and
over the subject matter under the law of the issuing jurisdiction;
(ii) the person against whom the order was issued had reasonable
notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to issuance of the order;
provided, however, that if the order was a temporary order of protection
issued in the absence of such person, that notice had been given and
that an opportunity to be heard had been provided within a reasonable
period of time after the issuance of the order; and
(iii) in the case of orders of protection or temporary orders of
protection issued against both a petitioner, plaintiff or complainant
and respondent or defendant, the order or portion thereof sought to be
enforced was supported by: (A) a pleading requesting such order,
including, but not limited to, a petition, cross-petition or
counterclaim; and (B) a judicial finding that the requesting party is
entitled to the issuance of the order which may result from a judicial
finding of fact, judicial acceptance of an admission by the party
against whom the order was issued or judicial finding that the party
against whom the order was issued had given knowing, intelligent and
voluntary consent to its issuance.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of article fifty-four of the civil
practice law and rules, an order of protection or temporary order of
protection issued by a court of competent jurisdiction in another state,
territorial or tribal jurisdiction, accompanied by a sworn affidavit
that upon information and belief such order is in effect as written and
has not been vacated or modified, may be filed without fee with the
clerk of the court, who shall transmit information regarding such order
to the statewide registry of orders of protection and warrants
established pursuant to section two hundred twenty-one-a of the
executive law; provided, however, that such filing and registry entry
shall not be required for enforcement of the order.
6. Notice. Every police officer, peace officer or district attorney
investigating a family offense under this article shall advise the
victim of the availability of a shelter or other services in the
community, and shall immediately give the victim written notice of the
legal rights and remedies available to a victim of a family offense
under the relevant provisions of this chapter and the family court act.
Such notice shall be prepared, at minimum, in plain English, Spanish,
Chinese and Russian and if necessary, shall be delivered orally, and
shall include but not be limited to the information contained in the
following statement:
"Are you the victim of domestic violence? If you need help now, you
can call 911 for the police to come to you. You can also call a domestic
violence hotline. You can have a confidential talk with an advocate at
the hotline about help you can get in your community including: where
you can get treatment for injuries, where you can get shelter, where you
can get support, and what you can do to be safe. The New York State
24-hour Domestic & Sexual Violence Hotline number is (insert the
statewide multilingual 800 number). They can give you information in
many languages. If you are deaf or hard of hearing, call 711.
This is what the police can do:
They can help you and your children find a safe place such as a family
or friend's house or a shelter in your community.
You can ask the officer to take you or help you and your children get
to a safe place in your community.
They can help connect you to a local domestic violence program.
They can help you get to a hospital or clinic for medical care.
They can help you get your personal belongings.
They must complete a report discussing the incident. They will give
you a copy of this police report before they leave the scene. It is
free.
They may, and sometimes must, arrest the person who harmed you if you
are the victim of a crime. The person arrested could be released at any
time, so it is important to plan for your safety.
If you have been abused or threatened, this is what you can ask the
police or district attorney to do:
File a criminal complaint against the person who harmed you.
Ask the criminal court to issue an order of protection for you and
your child if the district attorney files a criminal case with the
court.
Give you information about filing a family offense petition in your
local family court.
You also have the right to ask the family court for an order of
protection for you and your children.
This is what you can ask the family court to do:
To have your family offense petition filed the same day you go to
court.
To have your request heard in court the same day you file or the next
day court is open.
Only a judge can issue an order of protection. The judge does that as
part of a criminal or family court case against the person who harmed
you. An order of protection in family court or in criminal court can
say:
That the other person have no contact or communication with you by
mail, phone, computer or through other people.
That the other person stay away from you and your children, your home,
job or school.
That the other person not assault, harass, threaten, strangle, or
commit another family offense against you or your children.
That the other person turn in their firearms and firearms licenses,
and not get any more firearms.
That you have temporary custody of your children.
That the other person pay temporary child support.
That the other person not harm your pets or service animals.
If the family court is closed because it is night, a weekend, or a
holiday, you can go to a criminal court to ask for an order of
protection.
If you do not speak English or cannot speak it well, you can ask the
police, the district attorney, or the criminal or family court to get
you an interpreter who speaks your language. The interpreter can help
you explain what happened.
You can get the forms you need to ask for an order of protection at
your local family court (insert addresses and contact information for
courts). You can also get them online: www.NYCourts.gov/forms.
You do not need a lawyer to ask for an order of protection.
You have a right to get a lawyer in the family court. If the family
court finds that you cannot afford to pay for a lawyer, it must get you
one for free.
If you file a complaint or family court petition, you will be asked to
swear to its truthfulness because it is a crime to file a legal document
that you know is false."
The division of criminal justice services in consultation with the
state office for the prevention of domestic violence shall prepare the
form of such written notice consistent with provisions of this section
and distribute copies thereof to the appropriate law enforcement
officials pursuant to subdivision nine of section eight hundred
forty-one of the executive law.
Additionally, copies of such notice shall be provided to the chief
administrator of the courts to be distributed to victims of family
offenses through the criminal court at such time as such persons first
come before the court and to the state department of health for
distribution to all hospitals defined under article twenty-eight of the
public health law. No cause of action for damages shall arise in favor
of any person by reason of any failure to comply with the provisions of
this subdivision except upon a showing of gross negligence or willful
misconduct.
7. Rules of court regarding concurrent jurisdiction. The chief
administrator of the courts, pursuant to paragraph (e) of subdivision
two of section two hundred twelve of the judiciary law, shall promulgate
rules to facilitate record sharing and other communication between the
criminal and family courts, subject to applicable provisions of this
chapter and the family court act pertaining to the confidentiality,
expungement and sealing of records, when such courts exercise concurrent
jurisdiction over family offense proceedings.
Protection for victims of family offenses.
1. When a criminal action is pending involving a complaint charging
any crime or violation between spouses, former spouses, parent and
child, or between members of the same family or household, as members of
the same family or household are defined in subdivision one of section
530.11 of this article, the court, in addition to any other powers
conferred upon it by this chapter may issue a temporary order of
protection in conjunction with any securing order committing the
defendant to the custody of the sheriff or as a condition of any order
of recognizance or bail or an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal.
(a) In addition to any other conditions, such an order may require the
defendant: (1) to stay away from the home, school, business or place of
employment of the family or household member or of any designated
witness, provided that the court shall make a determination, and shall
state such determination in a written decision or on the record, whether
to impose a condition pursuant to this paragraph, provided further,
however, that failure to make such a determination shall not affect the
validity of such temporary order of protection. In making such
determination, the court shall consider, but shall not be limited to
consideration of, whether the temporary order of protection is likely to
achieve its purpose in the absence of such a condition, conduct subject
to prior orders of protection, prior incidents of abuse, past or present
injury, threats, drug or alcohol abuse, and access to weapons;
(2) to permit a parent, or a person entitled to visitation by a court
order or a separation agreement, to visit the child at stated periods;
(3) to refrain from committing a family offense, as defined in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this article, or any criminal
offense against the child or against the family or household member or
against any person to whom custody of the child is awarded, or from
harassing, intimidating or threatening such persons;
(4) to refrain from acts of commission or omission that create an
unreasonable risk to the health, safety and welfare of a child, family
or household member's life or health;
(5) to permit a designated party to enter the residence during a
specified period of time in order to remove personal belongings not in
issue in this proceeding or in any other proceeding or action under this
chapter, the family court act or the domestic relations law;
(6) (A) to refrain from intentionally injuring or killing, without
justification, any companion animal the defendant knows to be owned,
possessed, leased, kept or held by the victim or a minor child residing
in the household.
(B) "Companion animal", as used in this section, shall have the same
meaning as in subdivision five of section three hundred fifty of the
agriculture and markets law;
(7) (A) to promptly return specified identification documents to the
protected party, in whose favor the order of protection or temporary
order of protection is issued; provided, however, that such order may:
(i) include any appropriate provision designed to ensure that any such
document is available for use as evidence in this proceeding, and
available if necessary for legitimate use by the party against whom such
order is issued; and (ii) specify the manner in which such return shall
be accomplished.
(B) For purposes of this subparagraph, "identification document" shall
mean any of the following: (i) exclusively in the name of the protected
party: birth certificate, passport, social security card, health
insurance or other benefits card, a card or document used to access
bank, credit or other financial accounts or records, tax returns, any
driver's license, and immigration documents including but not limited to
a United States permanent resident card and employment authorization
document; and (ii) upon motion and after notice and an opportunity to be
heard, any of the following, including those that may reflect joint use
or ownership, that the court determines are necessary and are
appropriately transferred to the protected party: any card or document
used to access bank, credit or other financial accounts or records, tax
returns, and any other identifying cards and documents;
(8) (A) to refrain from remotely controlling any connected devices
affecting the home, vehicle or property of the person protected by the
order.
(B) For purposes of this subparagraph, "connected device" shall mean
any device, or other physical object that is capable of connecting to
the internet, directly or indirectly, and that is assigned an internet
protocol address or bluetooth address.
(b) The court may issue an order, pursuant to section two hundred
twenty-seven-c of the real property law, authorizing the party for whose
benefit any order of protection has been issued to terminate a lease or
rental agreement pursuant to section two hundred twenty-seven-c of the
real property law.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a temporary order of
protection issued or continued by a family court pursuant to section
eight hundred thirteen of the family court act shall continue in effect,
absent action by the appropriate criminal court pursuant to subdivision
three of this section, until the defendant is arraigned upon an
accusatory instrument filed pursuant to section eight hundred thirteen
of the family court act in such criminal court.
3. The court may issue a temporary order of protection ex parte upon
the filing of an accusatory instrument and for good cause shown. When a
family court order of protection is modified, the criminal court shall
forward a copy of such modified order to the family court issuing the
original order of protection; provided, however, that where a copy of
the modified order is transmitted to the family court by facsimile or
other electronic means, the original copy of such modified order and
accompanying affidavit shall be forwarded immediately thereafter.
3-a. Emergency powers when family court not in session; issuance of
temporary orders of protection. Upon the request of the petitioner, a
local criminal court may on an ex parte basis issue a temporary order of
protection pending a hearing in family court, provided that a sworn
affidavit, verified in accordance with subdivision one of section 100.30
of this chapter, is submitted: (i) alleging that the family court is not
in session; (ii) alleging that a family offense, as defined in
subdivision one of section eight hundred twelve of the family court act
and subdivision one of section 530.11 of this article, has been
committed; (iii) alleging that a family offense petition has been filed
or will be filed in family court on the next day the court is in
session; and (iv) showing good cause. Upon appearance in a local
criminal court, the petitioner shall be advised that he or she may
continue with the proceeding either in family court or upon the filing
of a local criminal court accusatory instrument in criminal court or
both. Upon issuance of a temporary order of protection where petitioner
requests that it be returnable in family court, the local criminal court
shall transfer the matter forthwith to the family court and shall make
the matter returnable in family court on the next day the family court
is in session, or as soon thereafter as practicable, but in no event
more than four calendar days after issuance of the order. The local
criminal court, upon issuing a temporary order of protection returnable
in family court pursuant to this subdivision, shall immediately forward,
in a manner designed to insure arrival before the return date set in the
order, a copy of the temporary order of protection and sworn affidavit
to the family court and shall provide a copy of such temporary order of
protection to the petitioner; provided, however, that where a copy of
the temporary order of protection and affidavit are transmitted to the
family court by facsimile or other electronic means, the original order
and affidavit shall be forwarded to the family court immediately
thereafter. Any temporary order of protection issued pursuant to this
subdivision shall be issued to the respondent, and copies shall be filed
as required in subdivisions six and eight of this section for orders of
protection issued pursuant to this section. Any temporary order of
protection issued pursuant to this subdivision shall plainly state the
date that such order expires which, in the case of an order returnable
in family court, shall be not more than four calendar days after its
issuance, unless sooner vacated or modified by the family court. A
petitioner requesting a temporary order of protection returnable in
family court pursuant to this subdivision in a case in which a family
court petition has not been filed shall be informed that such temporary
order of protection shall expire as provided for herein, unless the
petitioner files a petition pursuant to subdivision one of section eight
hundred twenty-one of the family court act on or before the return date
in family court and the family court issues a temporary order of
protection or order of protection as authorized under article eight of
the family court act. Nothing in this subdivision shall limit or
restrict the petitioner's right to proceed directly and without court
referral in either a criminal or family court, or both, as provided for
in section one hundred fifteen of the family court act and section
100.07 of this chapter.
3-b. Emergency powers when family court not in session; modifications
of orders of protection or temporary orders of protection. Upon the
request of the petitioner, a local criminal court may on an ex parte
basis modify a temporary order of protection or order of protection
which has been issued under article four, five, six or eight of the
family court act pending a hearing in family court, provided that a
sworn affidavit verified in accordance with subdivision one of section
100.30 of this chapter is submitted: (i) alleging that the family court
is not in session and (ii) showing good cause, including a showing that
the existing order is insufficient for the purposes of protection of the
petitioner, the petitioner's child or children or other members of the
petitioner's family or household. The local criminal court shall make
the matter regarding the modification of the order returnable in family
court on the next day the family court is in session, or as soon
thereafter as practicable, but in no event more than four calendar days
after issuance of the modified order. The court shall immediately
forward a copy of the modified order, if any, and sworn affidavit to the
family court and shall provide a copy of such modified order, if any,
and affidavit to the petitioner; provided, however, that where copies of
such modified order and affidavit are transmitted to the family court by
facsimile or other electronic means, the original copies of such
modified order and affidavit shall be forwarded to the family court
immediately thereafter. Any modified temporary order of protection or
order of protection issued pursuant to this subdivision shall be issued
to the respondent and copies shall be filed as required in subdivisions
six and eight of this section for orders of protection issued pursuant
to this section.
4. The court may issue or extend a temporary order of protection ex
parte or on notice simultaneously with the issuance of a warrant for the
arrest of defendant. Such temporary order of protection shall continue
in effect until the day the defendant subsequently appears in court
pursuant to such warrant or voluntarily or otherwise, unless there is a
dismissal of the matter. The court shall inform the defendant when
issuing the order of protection that it will remain in effect if the
defendant fails to appear in court on a subsequent court date. Provided,
however, that the court may vacate such order if a defendant fails to
appear at a subsequent court date if, after providing the parties an
opportunity to be heard, the court determines vacating the order of
protection is in the interest of justice, in which case the vacatur
shall be effective at such a time that the attorney for the defendant
files with the court a confirmation that the defendant has acknowledged
the conditional vacatur.
5. * Upon sentencing on a conviction for any crime or violation
between spouses, between a parent and child, or between members of the
same family or household as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11
of this article, the court may in addition to any other disposition,
including a conditional discharge or youthful offender adjudication,
enter an order of protection. Where a temporary order of protection was
issued, the court shall state on the record the reasons for issuing or
not issuing an order of protection. The duration of such an order shall
be fixed by the court and: (A) in the case of a felony conviction, shall
not exceed the greater of: (i) eight years from the date of such
sentencing, except where the sentence is or includes a sentence of
probation on a conviction for a felony sexual assault, as provided in
subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision three of section
65.00 of the penal law, in which case, ten years from the date of such
sentencing, or (ii) eight years from the date of the expiration of the
maximum term of an indeterminate or the term of a determinate sentence
of imprisonment actually imposed; or (B) in the case of a conviction for
a class A misdemeanor, shall not exceed the greater of: (i) five years
from the date of such sentencing, except where the sentence is or
includes a sentence of probation on a conviction for a misdemeanor
sexual assault, as provided in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (b) of
subdivision three of section 65.00 of the penal law, in which case, six
years from the date of such sentencing, or (ii) five years from the date
of the expiration of the maximum term of a definite or intermittent term
actually imposed; or (C) in the case of a conviction for any other
offense, shall not exceed the greater of: (i) two years from the date of
sentencing, or (ii) two years from the date of the expiration of the
maximum term of a definite or intermittent term actually imposed. For
purposes of determining the duration of an order of protection entered
pursuant to this subdivision, a conviction shall be deemed to include a
conviction that has been replaced by a youthful offender adjudication.
In addition to any other conditions, such an order may require the
defendant:
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* Upon sentencing on a conviction for any crime or violation between
spouses, between a parent and child, or between members of the same
family or household as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of
this article, the court may in addition to any other disposition,
including a conditional discharge or youthful offender adjudication,
enter an order of protection. Where a temporary order of protection was
issued, the court shall state on the record the reasons for issuing or
not issuing an order of protection. The duration of such an order shall
be fixed by the court and, in the case of a felony conviction, shall not
exceed the greater of: (i) five years from the date of such sentencing,
or (ii) three years from the date of the expiration of the maximum term
of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment actually imposed; or in the
case of a conviction for a class A misdemeanor, shall not exceed three
years from the date of such sentencing; or in the case of a conviction
for any other offense, shall not exceed one year from the date of
sentencing. For purposes of determining the duration of an order of
protection entered pursuant to this subdivision, a conviction shall be
deemed to include a conviction that has been replaced by a youthful
offender adjudication. In addition to any other conditions, such an
order may require the defendant:
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
(a) to stay away from the home, school, business or place of
employment of the family or household member, the other spouse or the
child, or of any witness designated by the court, provided that the
court shall make a determination, and shall state such determination in
a written decision or on the record, whether to impose a condition
pursuant to this paragraph, provided further, however, that failure to
make such a determination shall not affect the validity of such order of
protection. In making such determination, the court shall consider, but
shall not be limited to consideration of, whether the order of
protection is likely to achieve its purpose in the absence of such a
condition, conduct subject to prior orders of protection, prior
incidents of abuse, extent of past or present injury, threats, drug or
alcohol abuse, and access to weapons;
(b) to permit a parent, or a person entitled to visitation by a court
order or a separation agreement, to visit the child at stated periods;
(c) to refrain from committing a family offense, as defined in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this article, or any criminal
offense against the child or against the family or household member or
against any person to whom custody of the child is awarded, or from
harassing, intimidating or threatening such persons;
(d) to refrain from acts of commission or omission that create an
unreasonable risk to the health, safety and welfare of a child, family
or household member's life or health;
(e) to permit a designated party to enter the residence during a
specified period of time in order to remove personal belongings not in
issue in this proceeding or in any other proceeding or action under this
chapter, the family court act or the domestic relations law; or
(f) (i) to refrain from remotely controlling any connected devices
affecting the home, vehicle or property of the person protected by the
order.
(ii) For purposes of this paragraph, "connected device" shall mean any
device, or other physical object that is capable of connecting to the
internet, directly or indirectly, and that is assigned an internet
protocol address or bluetooth address.
6. An order of protection or a temporary order of protection issued
pursuant to subdivision one, two, three, four or five of this section
shall bear in a conspicuous manner the term "order of protection" or
"temporary order of protection" as the case may be and a copy shall be
filed by the clerk of the court with the sheriff's office in the county
in which the complainant resides, or, if the complainant resides within
a city, with the police department of such city. The order of protection
or temporary order of protection shall also contain the following
notice: "This order of protection will remain in effect even if the
protected party has, or consents to have, contact or communication with
the party against whom the order is issued. This order of protection can
only be modified or terminated by the court. The protected party cannot
be held to violate this order nor be arrested for violating this
order.". The absence of such language shall not affect the validity of
such order. A copy of such order of protection or temporary order of
protection may from time to time be filed by the clerk of the court with
any other police department or sheriff's office having jurisdiction of
the residence, work place, and school of anyone intended to be protected
by such order. A copy of the order may also be filed by the complainant
at the appropriate police department or sheriff's office having
jurisdiction. Any subsequent amendment or revocation of such order shall
be filed in the same manner as herein provided.
Such order of protection shall plainly state the date that such order
expires.
6-a. The court shall inquire as to the existence of any other orders
of protection between the defendant and the person or persons for whom
the order of protection is sought.
7. A family offense subject to the provisions of this section which
occurs subsequent to the issuance of an order of protection under this
chapter shall be deemed a new offense for which the complainant may seek
to file a new accusatory instrument and may file a family court petition
under article eight of the family court act as provided for in section
100.07 of this chapter.
8. In any proceeding in which an order of protection or temporary
order of protection or a warrant has been issued under this section, the
clerk of the court shall issue to the complainant and defendant and
defense counsel and to any other person affected by the order a copy of
the order of protection or temporary order of protection and ensure that
a copy of the order of protection or temporary order of protection be
transmitted to the local correctional facility where the individual is
or will be detained, the state or local correctional facility where the
individual is or will be imprisoned, and the supervising probation
department or department of corrections and community supervision where
the individual is under probation or parole supervision. The
presentation of a copy of such order or a warrant to any peace officer
acting pursuant to his or her special duties or police officer shall
constitute authority for him or her to arrest a person who has violated
the terms of such order and bring such person before the court and,
otherwise, so far as lies within his or her power, to aid in securing
the protection such order was intended to afford. The protected party in
whose favor the order of protection or temporary order of protection is
issued may not be held to violate an order issued in his or her favor
nor may such protected party be arrested for violating such order.
9. If no warrant, order or temporary order of protection has been
issued by the court, and an act alleged to be a family offense as
defined in section 530.11 of this chapter is the basis of the arrest,
the magistrate shall permit the complainant to file a petition,
information or accusatory instrument and for reasonable cause shown,
shall thereupon hold such respondent or defendant, admit to, fix or
accept bail, or parole him or her for hearing before the family court or
appropriate criminal court as the complainant shall choose in accordance
with the provisions of section 530.11 of this chapter.
10. Punishment for contempt based on a violation of an order of
protection or temporary order of protection shall not affect the
original criminal action, nor reduce or diminish a sentence upon
conviction for the original crime or violation alleged therein or for a
lesser included offense thereof.
11. If a defendant is brought before the court for failure to obey any
lawful order issued under this section, or an order of protection issued
by a court of competent jurisdiction in another state, territorial or
tribal jurisdiction, and if, after hearing, the court is satisfied by
competent proof that the defendant has willfully failed to obey any such
order, the court may:
(a) revoke an order of recognizance or release under non-monetary
conditions or revoke an order of bail or order forfeiture of such bail
and commit the defendant to custody; or
(b) restore the case to the calendar when there has been an
adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and commit the defendant to
custody; or
(c) revoke a conditional discharge in accordance with section 410.70
of this chapter and impose probation supervision or impose a sentence of
imprisonment in accordance with the penal law based on the original
conviction; or
(d) revoke probation in accordance with section 410.70 of this chapter
and impose a sentence of imprisonment in accordance with the penal law
based on the original conviction. In addition, if the act which
constitutes the violation of the order of protection or temporary order
of protection is a crime or a violation the defendant may be charged
with and tried for that crime or violation.
12. The chief administrator of the courts shall promulgate appropriate
uniform temporary orders of protection and orders of protection forms to
be used throughout the state. Such forms shall be promulgated and
developed in a manner to ensure the compatability of such forms with the
statewide computerized registry established pursuant to section two
hundred twenty-one-a of the executive law.
13. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, an order of protection,
or temporary order of protection when applicable, may be entered against
a former spouse and persons who have a child in common, regardless of
whether such persons have been married or have lived together at any
time, or against a member of the same family or household as defined in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this article.
14. The people shall make reasonable efforts to notify the complainant
alleging a crime constituting a family offense when the people have
decided to decline prosecution of such crime, to dismiss the criminal
charges against the defendant or to enter into a plea agreement. The
people shall advise the complainant of the right to file a petition in
the family court pursuant to section 100.07 of this chapter and section
one hundred fifteen of the family court act.
In any case where allegations of criminal conduct are transferred from
the family court to the criminal court pursuant to paragraph (ii) of
subdivision (b) of section eight hundred forty-six of the family court
act, the people shall advise the family court making the transfer of any
decision to file an accusatory instrument against the family court
respondent and shall notify such court of the disposition of such
instrument and the sentence, if any, imposed upon such respondent.
Release of a defendant from custody shall not be delayed because of
the requirements of this subdivision.
15. Any motion to vacate or modify an order of protection or temporary
order of protection shall be on notice to the non-moving party, except
as provided in subdivision three-b of this section.
Protection of victims of crimes, other than family offenses.
1. When any criminal action is pending, and the court has not issued a
temporary order of protection pursuant to section 530.12 of this
article, the court, in addition to the other powers conferred upon it by
this chapter, may for good cause shown issue a temporary order of
protection in conjunction with any securing order or an adjournment in
contemplation of dismissal. In addition to any other conditions, such an
order may require that the defendant:
(a) stay away from the home, school, business or place of employment
of the victims of, or designated witnesses to, the alleged offense;
(b) refrain from harassing, intimidating, threatening or otherwise
interfering with the victims of the alleged offense and such members of
the family or household of such victims or designated witnesses as shall
be specifically named by the court in such order;
(c) 1. to refrain from intentionally injuring or killing, without
justification, any companion animal the defendant knows to be owned,
possessed, leased, kept or held by such victim or victims or a minor
child residing in such victim's or victims' household.
2. "Companion animal", as used in this section, shall have the same
meaning as in subdivision five of section three hundred fifty of the
agriculture and markets law;
(d) 1. to refrain from remotely controlling any connected devices
affecting the home, vehicle or property of the person protected by the
order.
2. For purposes of this paragraph, "connected device" shall mean any
device, or other physical object that is capable of connecting to the
internet, directly or indirectly, and that is assigned an internet
protocol address or bluetooth address.
In addition to the foregoing provisions, the court may issue an order,
pursuant to section two hundred twenty-seven-c of the real property law,
authorizing the party for whose benefit any order of protection has been
issued to terminate a lease or rental agreement pursuant to section two
hundred twenty-seven-c of the real property law.
2. The court may issue a temporary order of protection under this
section ex parte upon the filing of an accusatory instrument and for
good cause shown.
3. The court may issue or extend a temporary order of protection under
this section ex parte simultaneously with the issuance of a warrant for
the arrest of the defendant. Such temporary order of protection shall
continue in effect until the day the defendant subsequently appears in
court pursuant to such warrant or voluntarily or otherwise, unless there
is a dismissal of the matter. The court shall inform the defendant when
issuing the order of protection that it will remain in effect if the
defendant fails to appear in court on a subsequent court date. Provided,
however, that the court may vacate such order if a defendant fails to
appear at a subsequent court date if, after providing the parties an
opportunity to be heard, the court determines vacating the order of
protection is in the interest of justice, in which case the vacatur
shall be effective at such a time that the attorney for the defendant
files with the court a confirmation that the defendant has acknowledged
the conditional vacatur.
4. * Upon sentencing on a conviction for any offense, where the court
has not issued an order of protection pursuant to section 530.12 of this
article, the court may, in addition to any other disposition, including
a conditional discharge or youthful offender adjudication, enter an
order of protection. Where a temporary order of protection was issued,
the court shall state on the record the reasons for issuing or not
issuing an order of protection. The duration of such an order shall be
fixed by the court and; (A) in the case of a felony conviction, shall
not exceed the greater of: (i) eight years from the date of such
sentencing, except where the sentence is or includes a sentence of
probation on a conviction for a felony sexual assault, as provided in
subparagraph (iii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision three of section
65.00 of the penal law, in which case, ten years from the date of such
sentencing, or (ii) eight years from the date of the expiration of the
maximum term of an indeterminate or the term of a determinate sentence
of imprisonment actually imposed; or (B) in the case of a conviction for
a class A misdemeanor, shall not exceed the greater of: (i) five years
from the date of such sentencing, except where the sentence is or
includes a sentence of probation on a conviction for a misdemeanor
sexual assault, as provided in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (b) of
subdivision three of section 65.00 of the penal law, in which case, six
years from the date of such sentencing or (ii) five years from the date
of the expiration of the maximum term of a definite or intermittent term
actually imposed; or (C) in the case of a conviction for any other
offense, shall not exceed the greater of: (i) two years from the date of
sentencing, or (ii) two years from the date of the expiration of the
maximum term of a definite or intermittent term actually imposed. For
purposes of determining the duration of an order of protection entered
pursuant to this subdivision, a conviction shall be deemed to include a
conviction that has been replaced by a youthful offender adjudication.
In addition to any other conditions such an order may require that the
defendant:
* NB Effective until September 1, 2027
* Upon sentencing on a conviction for any offense, where the court has
not issued an order of protection pursuant to section 530.12 of this
article, the court may, in addition to any other disposition, including
a conditional discharge or youthful offender adjudication, enter an
order of protection. Where a temporary order of protection was issued,
the court shall state on the record the reasons for issuing or not
issuing an order of protection. The duration of such an order shall be
fixed by the court and, in the case of a felony conviction, shall not
exceed the greater of: (i) five years from the date of such sentencing,
or (ii) three years from the date of the expiration of the maximum term
of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment actually imposed; or in the
case of a conviction for a class A misdemeanor, shall not exceed three
years from the date of such sentencing; or in the case of a conviction
for any other offense, shall not exceed one year from the date of
sentencing. For purposes of determining the duration of an order of
protection entered pursuant to this subdivision, a conviction shall be
deemed to include a conviction that has been replaced by a youthful
offender adjudication. In addition to any other conditions such an order
may require that the defendant:
* NB Effective September 1, 2027
(a) stay away from the home, school, business or place of employment
of the victim or victims, or of any witness designated by the court, of
such offense;
(b) refrain from harassing, intimidating, threatening or otherwise
interfering with the victim or victims of the offense and such members
of the family or household of such victim or victims as shall be
specifically named by the court in such order;
(c) 1. to refrain from intentionally injuring or killing, without
justification, any companion animal the defendant knows to be owned,
possessed, leased, kept or held by such victim or victims or a minor
child residing in such victim's or victims' household.
2. "Companion animal", as used in this section, shall have the same
meaning as in subdivision five of section three hundred fifty of the
agriculture and markets law;
(d) 1. to refrain from remotely controlling any connected devices
affecting the home, vehicle or property of the person protected by the
order.
2. For purposes of this paragraph, "connected device" shall mean any
device, or other physical object that is capable of connecting to the
internet, directly or indirectly, and that is assigned an internet
protocol address or bluetooth address.
5. The court shall inquire as to the existence of any other orders of
protection between the defendant and the person or persons for whom the
order of protection is sought. An order of protection issued under this
section shall plainly state the date that such order expires. Orders of
protection issued to protect victims of domestic violence, as defined in
section four hundred fifty-nine-a of the social services law, shall be
on uniform statewide forms that shall be promulgated by the chief
administrator of the courts in a manner to ensure the compatibility of
such forms with the statewide registry of orders of protection and
warrants established pursuant to section two hundred twenty-one-a of the
executive law. A copy of an order of protection or a temporary order of
protection issued pursuant to subdivision one, two, three, or four of
this section shall be filed by the clerk of the court with the sheriff's
office in the county in which such victim or victims reside, or, if the
victim or victims reside within a city, with the police department of
such city, and shall be filed with the computerized registry of orders
of protection and arrest warrants established pursuant to section two
hundred twenty-one-a of the executive law where the court determines
that such filing is required to implement the purposes of such order. A
copy of such order of protection or temporary order of protection may
from time to time be filed by the clerk of the court with any other
police department or sheriff's office having jurisdiction of the
residence, work place, and school of anyone intended to be protected by
such order. A copy of the order may also be filed by the victim or
victims at the appropriate police department or sheriff's office having
jurisdiction. Any subsequent amendment or revocation of such order shall
be filed in the same manner as herein provided.
6. In any proceeding in which an order of protection or temporary
order of protection or a warrant has been issued under this section, the
clerk of the court shall issue to the victim and the defendant and
defense counsel and to any other person affected by the order, a copy of
the order of protection or temporary order of protection and ensure that
a copy of the order of protection or temporary order of protection be
transmitted to the local correctional facility where the individual is
or will be detained, the state or local correctional facility where the
individual is or will be imprisoned, and the supervising probation
department or department of corrections and community supervision where
the individual is under probation or parole supervision. The
presentation of a copy of such order or a warrant to any police officer
or peace officer acting pursuant to his or her special duties shall
constitute authority for him or her to arrest a person who has violated
the terms of such order and bring such person before the court and,
otherwise, so far as lies within his or her power, to aid in securing
the protection such order was intended to afford.
7. Punishment for contempt based upon a violation of an order or
protection or temporary order of protection issued under this section
shall not affect a pending criminal action, nor reduce or diminish a
sentence upon conviction for any other crimes or offenses.
8. If a defendant is brought before the court for failure to obey any
lawful order issued under this section and if, after hearing, the court
is satisfied by competent proof that the defendant has willfully failed
to obey any such order, the court may:
(a) revoke an order of recognizance, release under non-monetary
conditions or bail and commit the defendant to custody; or
(b) restore the case to the calendar when there has been an
adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and commit the defendant to
custody or impose or increase bail pending a trial of the original crime
or violation; or
(c) revoke a conditional discharge in accordance with section 410.70
of this chapter and impose probation supervision or impose a sentence of
imprisonment in accordance with the penal law based on the original
conviction; or
(d) revoke probation in accordance with section 410.70 of this chapter
and impose a sentence of imprisonment in accordance with the penal law
based on the original conviction. In addition, if the act which
constitutes the violation of the order of protection or temporary order
of protection is a crime or a violation the defendant may be charged
with and tried for that crime or violation.
9. The chief administrator of the courts shall promulgate appropriate
uniform temporary order of protection and order of protection forms to
be used throughout the state.
Suspension and revocation of a license to carry, possess,
repair or dispose of a firearm or firearms pursuant to
section 400.00 of the penal law and ineligibility for such a
license; order to surrender firearms; order to seize
firearms.
1. Suspension of firearms license and ineligibility for such a license
upon issuance of temporary order of protection. Whenever a temporary
order of protection is issued pursuant to subdivision one of section
530.12 or subdivision one of section 530.13 of this article the court
shall inquire of the defendant and the prosecutor as to the existence
and location of any firearm, rifle or shotgun reasonably believed to be
owned or possessed by the defendant, and the prosecutor will make
reasonable efforts to obtain such information regarding the same and
present it to the court and:
(a) the court shall suspend any such existing license possessed by the
defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and order
the immediate surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns
owned or possessed where the court receives information that gives the
court good cause to believe that (i) the defendant has a prior
conviction of any violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of
the penal law; (ii) the defendant has previously been found to have
willfully failed to obey a prior order of protection and such willful
failure involved (A) the infliction of physical injury, as defined in
subdivision nine of section 10.00 of the penal law, (B) the use or
threatened use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument as those terms
are defined in subdivisions twelve and thirteen of section 10.00 of the
penal law, or (C) behavior constituting any violent felony offense as
defined in section 70.02 of the penal law; or (iii) the defendant has a
prior conviction for stalking in the first degree as defined in section
120.60 of the penal law, stalking in the second degree as defined in
section 120.55 of the penal law, stalking in the third degree as defined
in section 120.50 of the penal law or stalking in the fourth degree as
defined in section 120.45 of such law;
(b) the court shall where the court finds a substantial risk that the
defendant may use or threaten to use a firearm, rifle or shotgun
unlawfully against the person or persons for whose protection the
temporary order of protection is issued, suspend any such existing
license possessed by the defendant, order the defendant ineligible for
such a license and order the immediate surrender pursuant to
subparagraph (f) of paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20 and
subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law, of any or all
firearms, rifles and shotguns owned or possessed; and
(c) the court shall where the defendant willfully refuses to surrender
such firearm, rifle or shotgun pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this subdivision, or may for other good cause shown, order the immediate
seizure of such firearm, rifle or shotgun, and search therefor, pursuant
to an order issued in accordance with article six hundred ninety of this
part, consistent with such rights as the defendant may derive from this
article or the constitution of this state or the United States.
2. Revocation or suspension of firearms license and ineligibility for
such a license upon issuance of an order of protection. Whenever an
order of protection is issued pursuant to subdivision five of section
530.12 or subdivision four of section 530.13 of this article the court
shall inquire of the defendant and the prosecutor as to the existence
and location of any firearm, rifle or shotgun reasonably believed to be
owned or possessed by the defendant, and the prosecutor will make
reasonable efforts to obtain such information regarding the same and
present it to the court and:
(a) the court shall revoke any such existing license possessed by the
defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and order
the immediate surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns
owned or possessed where such action is required by section 400.00 of
the penal law;
(b) the court shall where the court finds a substantial risk that the
defendant may use or threaten to use a firearm, rifle or shotgun
unlawfully against the person or persons for whose protection the order
of protection is issued, (i) revoke any such existing license possessed
by the defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and
order the immediate surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and
shotguns owned or possessed or (ii) suspend or continue to suspend any
such existing license possessed by the defendant, order the defendant
ineligible for such a license and order the immediate surrender pursuant
to subparagraph (f) of paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20
and subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law, of any or all
firearms, rifles and shotguns owned or possessed; and
(c) the court shall where the defendant willfully refuses to surrender
such firearm, rifle or shotgun pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this subdivision, or may for other good cause shown, order the immediate
seizure of such firearm, rifle or shotgun, and search therefor, pursuant
to an order issued in accordance with article six hundred ninety of this
part, consistent with such rights as the defendant may derive from this
article or the constitution of this state or the United States.
3. Revocation or suspension of firearms license and ineligibility for
such a license upon a finding of a willful failure to obey an order of
protection. Whenever a defendant has been found pursuant to subdivision
eleven of section 530.12 or subdivision eight of section 530.13 of this
article to have willfully failed to obey an order of protection issued
by a court of competent jurisdiction in this state or another state,
territorial or tribal jurisdiction, in addition to any other remedies
available pursuant to subdivision eleven of section 530.12 or
subdivision eight of section 530.13 of this article the court shall
inquire of the defendant and the prosecutor as to the existence and
location of any firearm, rifle or shotgun reasonably believed to be
owned or possessed by the defendant, and the prosecutor will make
reasonable efforts to obtain such information regarding the same and
present it to the court and:
(a) the court shall revoke any such existing license possessed by the
defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and order
the immediate surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns
owned or possessed where the willful failure to obey such order involved
(i) the infliction of physical injury, as defined in subdivision nine of
section 10.00 of the penal law, (ii) the use or threatened use of a
deadly weapon or dangerous instrument as those terms are defined in
subdivisions twelve and thirteen of section 10.00 of the penal law,
(iii) behavior constituting any violent felony offense as defined in
section 70.02 of the penal law; or (iv) behavior constituting stalking
in the first degree as defined in section 120.60 of the penal law,
stalking in the second degree as defined in section 120.55 of the penal
law, stalking in the third degree as defined in section 120.50 of the
penal law or stalking in the fourth degree as defined in section 120.45
of such law;
(b) the court shall where the court finds a substantial risk that the
defendant may use or threaten to use a firearm, rifle or shotgun
unlawfully against the person or persons for whose protection the order
of protection was issued, (i) revoke any such existing license possessed
by the defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and
order the immediate surrender pursuant to subparagraph (f) of paragraph
one of subdivision a of section 265.20 and subdivision six of section
400.05 of the penal law, of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns
owned or possessed or (ii) suspend any such existing license possessed
by the defendant, order the defendant ineligible for such a license and
order the immediate surrender pursuant to subparagraph (f) of paragraph
one of subdivision a of section 265.20 and subdivision six of section
400.05 of the penal law, of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns
owned or possessed; and
(c) the court shall where the defendant willfully refuses to surrender
such firearm, rifle or shotgun pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this subdivision, or may for other good cause shown, order the immediate
seizure of such firearm, rifle or shotgun, and search therefor, pursuant
to an order issued in accordance with article six hundred ninety of this
part, consistent with such rights as the defendant may derive from this
article or the constitution of this state or the United States.
4. Suspension. Any suspension order issued pursuant to this section
shall remain in effect for the duration of the temporary order of
protection or order of protection, unless modified or vacated by the
court.
5. Surrender. (a) Where an order to surrender one or more firearms,
rifles and shotguns has been issued, the temporary order of protection
or order of protection shall specify the place where such weapons shall
be surrendered, shall specify a date and time by which the surrender
shall be completed and, to the extent possible, shall describe such
weapons to be surrendered, and shall direct the authority receiving such
surrendered weapons to immediately notify the court of such surrender.
(b) The prompt surrender of one or more firearms, rifles or shotguns
pursuant to a court order issued pursuant to this section shall be
considered a voluntary surrender for purposes of subparagraph (f) of
paragraph one of subdivision a of section 265.20 of the penal law. The
disposition of any such weapons, including weapons ordered to be seized
pursuant to this section and section eight hundred forty-two-a of the
family court act, shall be in accordance with the provisions of
subdivision six of section 400.05 of the penal law; provided, however,
that upon termination of any suspension order issued pursuant to this
section or section eight hundred forty-two-a of the family court act,
upon written application of the subject of the order, with notice and
opportunity to be heard to the district attorney, the county attorney,
the protected party, and every licensing officer responsible for
issuance of a firearms license to the subject of the order pursuant to
article four hundred of the penal law, and upon a written finding that
there is no legal impediment to the subject's possession of a
surrendered firearm, rifle or shotgun, any court of record exercising
criminal jurisdiction may order the return of a firearm, rifle or
shotgun not otherwise disposed of in accordance with subdivision six of
section 400.05 of the penal law. When issuing such order in connection
with any firearm subject to a license requirement under article four
hundred of the penal law, if the licensing officer informs the court
that he or she will seek to revoke the license, the order shall be
stayed by the court until the conclusion of any license revocation
proceeding.
(c) The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to limit,
restrict or otherwise impair the authority of the court to order and
direct the surrender of any or all firearms, rifles and shotguns owned
or possessed by a defendant pursuant to sections 530.12 or 530.13 of
this article.
(d) If any other person demonstrates that such person is the lawful
owner of any weapon taken into custody pursuant to this section or
section eight hundred forty-two-a of the family court act, and provided
that the court has made a written finding that there is no legal
impediment to the person's possession of such a weapon, such court shall
direct that such weapon be returned to such lawful owner.
6. Notice. (a) Where an order requiring surrender, revocation,
suspension, seizure or ineligibility has been issued pursuant to this
section, any temporary order of protection or order of protection issued
shall state that such firearm license has been suspended or revoked or
that the defendant is ineligible for such license, as the case may be,
and that the defendant is prohibited from possessing any firearm, rifle
or shotgun.
(b) The court revoking or suspending the license, ordering the
defendant ineligible for such a license, or ordering the surrender or
seizure of any firearm, rifle or shotgun shall immediately notify the
duly constituted police authorities of the locality concerning such
action and, in the case of orders of protection and temporary orders of
protection issued pursuant to section 530.12 of this article, shall
immediately notify the statewide registry of orders of protection.
(c) The court revoking or suspending the license or ordering the
defendant ineligible for such a license shall give written notice
thereof without unnecessary delay to the division of state police at its
office in the city of Albany.
(d) Where an order of revocation, suspension, ineligibility, surrender
or seizure is modified or vacated, the court shall immediately notify
the statewide registry of orders of protection and the duly constituted
police authorities of the locality concerning such action and shall give
written notice thereof without unnecessary delay to the division of
state police at its office in the city of Albany.
7. Hearing. The defendant shall have the right to a hearing before the
court regarding any revocation, suspension, ineligibility, surrender or
seizure order issued pursuant to this section, provided that nothing in
this subdivision shall preclude the court from issuing any such order
prior to a hearing. Where the court has issued such an order prior to a
hearing, it shall commence such hearing within fourteen days of the date
such order was issued.
8. Nothing in this section shall delay or otherwise interfere with the
issuance of a temporary order of protection or the timely arraignment of
a defendant in custody.
Securing order by local criminal court when action is pending
therein.
When a criminal action is pending in a local criminal court, such
court, upon application of a defendant, shall proceed as follows:
1. (a) In cases other than as described in paragraph (b) of this
subdivision, the court shall release the principal pending trial on the
principal's own recognizance or release the principal pending trial
under non-monetary conditions, the determination for which shall be made
in accordance with subdivision one of section 510.10 of this title. The
court shall explain the basis for its determination and choice of
securing order on the record or in writing.
(b) Where the principal stands charged with a qualifying offense, the
court, unless otherwise prohibited by law, may in its discretion release
the principal pending trial on the principal's own recognizance or under
non-monetary conditions, fix bail, order non-monetary conditions in
conjunction with fixing bail, or, where the defendant is charged with a
qualifying offense which is a felony, the court may commit the principal
to the custody of the sheriff. The court shall explain its choice of
securing order on the record or in writing. A principal stands charged
with a qualifying offense when he or she stands charged with:
(i) a felony enumerated in section 70.02 of the penal law, other than
robbery in the second degree as defined in subdivision one of section
160.10 of the penal law, provided, however, that burglary in the second
degree as defined in subdivision two of section 140.25 of the penal law
shall be a qualifying offense only where the defendant is charged with
entering the living area of the dwelling;
(ii) a crime involving witness intimidation under section 215.15 of
the penal law;
(iii) a crime involving witness tampering under section 215.11, 215.12
or 215.13 of the penal law;
(iv) a class A felony defined in the penal law, provided, that for
class A felonies under article two hundred twenty of such law, only
class A-I felonies shall be a qualifying offense;
(v) a sex trafficking offense defined in section 230.34 or 230.34-a of
the penal law, or a felony sex offense defined in section 70.80 of the
penal law or a crime involving incest as defined in section 255.25,
255.26 or 255.27 of such law, or a misdemeanor defined in article one
hundred thirty of such law;
(vi) conspiracy in the second degree as defined in section 105.15 of
the penal law, where the underlying allegation of such charge is that
the defendant conspired to commit a class A felony defined in article
one hundred twenty-five of the penal law;
(vii) money laundering in support of terrorism in the first degree as
defined in section 470.24 of the penal law; money laundering in support
of terrorism in the second degree as defined in section 470.23 of the
penal law; money laundering in support of terrorism in the third degree
as defined in section 470.22 of the penal law; money laundering in
support of terrorism in the fourth degree as defined in section 470.21
of the penal law; or a felony crime of terrorism as defined in article
four hundred ninety of the penal law, other than the crime defined in
section 490.20 of such law;
(viii) criminal contempt in the second degree as defined in
subdivision three of section 215.50 of the penal law, criminal contempt
in the first degree as defined in subdivision (b), (c) or (d) of section
215.51 of the penal law or aggravated criminal contempt as defined in
section 215.52 of the penal law, and the underlying allegation of such
charge of criminal contempt in the second degree, criminal contempt in
the first degree or aggravated criminal contempt is that the defendant
violated a duly served order of protection where the protected party is
a member of the defendant's same family or household as defined in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of this article;
(ix) facilitating a sexual performance by a child with a controlled
substance or alcohol as defined in section 263.30 of the penal law, use
of a child in a sexual performance as defined in section 263.05 of the
penal law or luring a child as defined in subdivision one of section
120.70 of the penal law, promoting an obscene sexual performance by a
child as defined in section 263.10 of the penal law or promoting a
sexual performance by a child as defined in section 263.15 of the penal
law;
(x) any crime that is alleged to have caused the death of another
person;
(xi) criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation as defined
in section 121.11 of the penal law, strangulation in the second degree
as defined in section 121.12 of the penal law or unlawful imprisonment
in the first degree as defined in section 135.10 of the penal law, and
is alleged to have committed the offense against a member of the
defendant's same family or household as defined in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this article;
(xii) aggravated vehicular assault as defined in section 120.04-a of
the penal law or vehicular assault in the first degree as defined in
section 120.04 of the penal law;
(xiii) assault in the third degree as defined in section 120.00 of the
penal law or arson in the third degree as defined in section 150.10 of
the penal law, when such crime is charged as a hate crime as defined in
section 485.05 of the penal law;
(xiv) aggravated assault upon a person less than eleven years old as
defined in section 120.12 of the penal law or criminal possession of a
weapon on school grounds as defined in section 265.01-a of the penal
law;
(xv) grand larceny in the first degree as defined in section 155.42 of
the penal law, enterprise corruption as defined in section 460.20 of the
penal law, or money laundering in the first degree as defined in section
470.20 of the penal law;
(xvi) failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to section one
hundred sixty-eight-t of the correction law or endangering the welfare
of a child as defined in subdivision one of section 260.10 of the penal
law, where the defendant is required to maintain registration under
article six-C of the correction law and designated a level three
offender pursuant to subdivision six of section one hundred
sixty-eight-l of the correction law;
(xvii) a crime involving bail jumping under section 215.55, 215.56 or
215.57 of the penal law, or a crime involving escaping from custody
under section 205.05, 205.10 or 205.15 of the penal law;
(xviii) any felony offense committed by the principal while serving a
sentence of probation or while released to post release supervision;
(xix) a felony, where the defendant qualifies for sentencing on such
charge as a persistent felony offender pursuant to section 70.10 of the
penal law;
(xx) any felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an
identifiable person or property, or any charge of criminal possession of
a firearm as defined in section 265.01-b of the penal law where such
charge arose from conduct occurring while the defendant was released on
his or her own recognizance, released under conditions, or had yet to be
arraigned after the issuance of a desk appearance ticket for a separate
felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an identifiable person
or property, provided, however, that the prosecutor must show reasonable
cause to believe that the defendant committed the instant crime and any
underlying crime. For the purposes of this subparagraph, any of the
underlying crimes need not be a qualifying offense as defined in this
subdivision. For the purposes of this paragraph, "harm to an
identifiable person or property" shall include but not be limited to
theft of or damage to property. However, based upon a review of the
facts alleged in the accusatory instrument, if the court determines that
such theft is negligible and does not appear to be in furtherance of
other criminal activity, the principal shall be released on his or her
own recognizance or under appropriate non-monetary conditions; or
(xxi) criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined
in subdivision three of section 265.02 of the penal law or criminal sale
of a firearm to a minor as defined in section 265.16 of the penal law.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
subdivision, with respect to any charge for which bail or remand is not
ordered, and for which the court would not or could not otherwise
require bail or remand, a defendant may, at any time, request that the
court set bail in a nominal amount requested by the defendant in the
form specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 520.10 of
this title; if the court is satisfied that the request is voluntary, the
court shall set such bail in such amount.
2. When the defendant is charged, by felony complaint, with a felony,
the court may, in its discretion, and in accordance with section 510.10
of this title, order recognizance, release under non-monetary
conditions, or, where authorized, fix bail, or order non-monetary
conditions in conjunction with fixing bail, or commit the defendant to
the custody of the sheriff except as otherwise provided in subdivision
one of this section or this subdivision:
(a) A city court, a town court or a village court may not order
recognizance or bail when (i) the defendant is charged with a class A
felony, or (ii) the defendant has two previous felony convictions;
(b) No local criminal court may order recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions or bail with respect to a defendant charged with
a felony unless and until:
(i) The district attorney has been heard in the matter or, after
knowledge or notice of the application and reasonable opportunity to be
heard, has failed to appear at the proceeding or has otherwise waived
his right to do so; and
(ii) The court and counsel for the defendant have been furnished with
a report of the division of criminal justice services concerning the
defendant's criminal record, if any, or with a police department report
with respect to the defendant's prior arrest and conviction record, if
any. If neither report is available, the court, with the consent of the
district attorney, may dispense with this requirement; provided,
however, that in an emergency, including but not limited to a
substantial impairment in the ability of such division or police
department to timely furnish such report, such consent shall not be
required if, for reasons stated on the record, the court deems it
unnecessary. When the court has been furnished with any such report or
record, it shall furnish a copy thereof to counsel for the defendant or,
if the defendant is not represented by counsel, to the defendant.
Order of recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or
bail; by superior court judge when action is pending in
local criminal court.
1. When a criminal action is pending in a local criminal court, other
than one consisting of a superior court judge sitting as such, a judge
of a superior court holding a term thereof in the county, upon
application of a defendant, may order recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions or, where authorized, bail when such local
criminal court:
(a) Lacks authority to issue such an order, pursuant to the relevant
provisions of section 530.20 of this article; or
(b) Has denied an application for recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions or bail; or
(c) Has fixed bail, where authorized, which is excessive; or
(d) Has set a securing order of release under non-monetary conditions
which are more restrictive than necessary to reasonably assure the
defendant's return to court.
In such case, such superior court judge may vacate the order of such
local criminal court and release the defendant on recognizance or under
non-monetary conditions, or where authorized, fix bail in a lesser
amount or in a less burdensome form, or order non-monetary conditions in
conjunction with fixing bail, including fixing bail in a lesser amount
or in a less burdensome form, the determination for which shall be made
in accordance with section 510.10 of this title. The court shall explain
the basis for its determination and choice of securing order on the
record or in writing.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one of this section,
when the defendant is charged with a felony in a local criminal court, a
superior court judge may not order recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions or, where authorized, bail unless and until the
district attorney has had an opportunity to be heard in the matter and
such judge and counsel for the defendant have been furnished with a
report as described in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (b) of subdivision
two of section 530.20 of this article.
3. Not more than one application may be made pursuant to this section.
Order of recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or
bail; by superior court when action is pending therein.
When a criminal action is pending in a superior court, such court,
upon application of a defendant, must or may order recognizance or bail
as follows:
1. When the defendant is charged with an offense or offenses of less
than felony grade only, the court must, unless otherwise provided by
law, order recognizance or release under non-monetary conditions in
accordance with this section.
2. When the defendant is charged with a felony, the court may, unless
otherwise provided by law in its discretion, order recognizance, release
under non-monetary conditions or, where authorized, bail. In any such
case in which an indictment (a) has resulted from an order of a local
criminal court holding the defendant for the action of the grand jury,
or (b) was filed at a time when a felony complaint charging the same
conduct was pending in a local criminal court, and in which such local
criminal court or a superior court judge has issued an order of
recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or, where
authorized, bail which is still effective, the superior court's order
may be in the form of a direction continuing the effectiveness of the
previous order.
3. In cases other than as described in subdivision four of this
section the court shall release the principal pending trial on the
principal's own recognizance or release the principal pending trial
under non-monetary conditions, the determination for which shall be made
in accordance with section 510.10 of this title. The court shall explain
the basis for its determination and choice of securing order on the
record or in writing.
4. Where the principal stands charged with a qualifying offense, the
court, unless otherwise prohibited by law, may in its discretion, and in
accordance with section 510.10 of this title, release the principal
pending trial on the principal's own recognizance or under non-monetary
conditions, fix bail, or order non-monetary conditions in conjunction
with fixing bail, or, where the defendant is charged with a qualifying
offense which is a felony, the court may commit the principal to the
custody of the sheriff. The court shall explain the basis for its
determination and its choice of securing order on the record or in
writing. A principal stands charged with a qualifying offense for the
purposes of this subdivision when he or she stands charged with:
(a) a felony enumerated in section 70.02 of the penal law, other than
robbery in the second degree as defined in subdivision one of section
160.10 of the penal law, provided, however, that burglary in the second
degree as defined in subdivision two of section 140.25 of the penal law
shall be a qualifying offense only where the defendant is charged with
entering the living area of the dwelling;
(b) a crime involving witness intimidation under section 215.15 of the
penal law;
(c) a crime involving witness tampering under section 215.11, 215.12
or 215.13 of the penal law;
(d) a class A felony defined in the penal law, provided that for class
A felonies under article two hundred twenty of such law, only class A-I
felonies shall be a qualifying offense;
(e) a sex trafficking offense defined in section 230.34 or 230.34-a of
the penal law, or a felony sex offense defined in section 70.80 of the
penal law or a crime involving incest as defined in section 255.25,
255.26 or 255.27 of such law, or a misdemeanor defined in article one
hundred thirty of such law;
(f) conspiracy in the second degree as defined in section 105.15 of
the penal law, where the underlying allegation of such charge is that
the defendant conspired to commit a class A felony defined in article
one hundred twenty-five of the penal law;
(g) money laundering in support of terrorism in the first degree as
defined in section 470.24 of the penal law; money laundering in support
of terrorism in the second degree as defined in section 470.23 of the
penal law; money laundering in support of terrorism in the third degree
as defined in section 470.22 of the penal law; money laundering in
support of terrorism in the fourth degree as defined in section 470.21
of the penal law; or a felony crime of terrorism as defined in article
four hundred ninety of the penal law, other than the crime defined in
section 490.20 of such law;
(h) criminal contempt in the second degree as defined in subdivision
three of section 215.50 of the penal law, criminal contempt in the first
degree as defined in subdivision (b), (c) or (d) of section 215.51 of
the penal law or aggravated criminal contempt as defined in section
215.52 of the penal law, and the underlying allegation of such charge of
criminal contempt in the second degree, criminal contempt in the first
degree or aggravated criminal contempt is that the defendant violated a
duly served order of protection where the protected party is a member of
the defendant's same family or household as defined in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of this article;
(i) facilitating a sexual performance by a child with a controlled
substance or alcohol as defined in section 263.30 of the penal law, use
of a child in a sexual performance as defined in section 263.05 of the
penal law or luring a child as defined in subdivision one of section
120.70 of the penal law, promoting an obscene sexual performance by a
child as defined in section 263.10 of the penal law or promoting a
sexual performance by a child as defined in section 263.15 of the penal
law;
(j) any crime that is alleged to have caused the death of another
person;
(k) criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation as defined
in section 121.11 of the penal law, strangulation in the second degree
as defined in section 121.12 of the penal law or unlawful imprisonment
in the first degree as defined in section 135.10 of the penal law, and
is alleged to have committed the offense against a member of the
defendant's same family or household as defined in subdivision one of
section 530.11 of this article;
(l) aggravated vehicular assault as defined in section 120.04-a of the
penal law or vehicular assault in the first degree as defined in section
120.04 of the penal law;
(m) assault in the third degree as defined in section 120.00 of the
penal law or arson in the third degree as defined in section 150.10 of
the penal law, when such crime is charged as a hate crime as defined in
section 485.05 of the penal law;
(n) aggravated assault upon a person less than eleven years old as
defined in section 120.12 of the penal law or criminal possession of a
weapon on school grounds as defined in section 265.01-a of the penal
law;
(o) grand larceny in the first degree as defined in section 155.42 of
the penal law, enterprise corruption as defined in section 460.20 of the
penal law, or money laundering in the first degree as defined in section
470.20 of the penal law;
(p) failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to section one
hundred sixty-eight-t of the correction law or endangering the welfare
of a child as defined in subdivision one of section 260.10 of the penal
law, where the defendant is required to maintain registration under
article six-C of the correction law and designated a level three
offender pursuant to subdivision six of section one hundred
sixty-eight-l of the correction law;
(q) a crime involving bail jumping under section 215.55, 215.56 or
215.57 of the penal law, or a crime involving escaping from custody
under section 205.05, 205.10 or 205.15 of the penal law;
(r) any felony offense committed by the principal while serving a
sentence of probation or while released to post release supervision;
(s) a felony, where the defendant qualifies for sentencing on such
charge as a persistent felony offender pursuant to section 70.10 of the
penal law;
(t) any felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an
identifiable person or property, or any charge of criminal possession of
a firearm as defined in section 265.01-b of the penal law, where such
charge arose from conduct occurring while the defendant was released on
his or her own recognizance, released under conditions, or had yet to be
arraigned after the issuance of a desk appearance ticket for a separate
felony or class A misdemeanor involving harm to an identifiable person
or property, or any charge of criminal possession of a firearm as
defined in section 265.01-b of the penal law, provided, however, that
the prosecutor must show reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed the instant crime and any underlying crime. For the purposes
of this subparagraph, any of the underlying crimes need not be a
qualifying offense as defined in this subdivision. For the purposes of
this paragraph, "harm to an identifiable person or property" shall
include but not be limited to theft of or damage to property. However,
based upon a review of the facts alleged in the accusatory instrument,
if the court determines that such theft is negligible and does not
appear to be in furtherance of other criminal activity, the principal
shall be released on his or her own recognizance or under appropriate
non-monetary conditions; or
(u) criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined in
subdivision three of section 265.02 of the penal law or criminal sale of
a firearm to a minor as defined in section 265.16 of the penal law.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions three and four of
this section, with respect to any charge for which bail or remand is not
ordered, and for which the court would not or could not otherwise
require bail or remand, a defendant may, at any time, request that the
court set bail in a nominal amount requested by the defendant in the
form specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 520.10 of
this title; if the court is satisfied that the request is voluntary, the
court shall set such bail in such amount.
6. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions two, three and four
of this section, a superior court may not order recognizance, release
under non-monetary conditions or, where authorized, bail, or permit a
defendant to remain at liberty pursuant to an existing order, after the
defendant has been convicted of either: (a) a class A felony or (b) any
class B or class C felony as defined in article one hundred thirty of
the penal law committed or attempted to be committed by a person
eighteen years of age or older against a person less than eighteen years
of age. In either case the court must commit or remand the defendant to
the custody of the sheriff.
7. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions two, three and four
of this section, a superior court may not order recognizance, release
under non-monetary conditions or, where authorized, bail when the
defendant is charged with a felony unless and until the district
attorney has had an opportunity to be heard in the matter and such court
and counsel for the defendant have been furnished with a report as
described in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (b) of subdivision two of
section 530.20 of this article.
Order of recognizance or bail; after conviction and before
sentence.
1. When the defendant is at liberty in the course of a criminal action
as a result of a prior securing order and the court revokes such order
and then, where authorized, fixes no bail, fixes bail in a greater
amount or in a more burdensome form than was previously fixed, or, in
conjunction with the imposition of non-monetary conditions, fixes bail
in a greater amount or in a more burdensome form than was previously
fixed and remands or commits defendant to the custody of the sheriff, or
issues a more restrictive securing order, a judge designated in
subdivision two of this section, upon application of the defendant
following conviction of an offense other than a class A felony or a
class B or class C felony offense as defined in article one hundred
thirty of the penal law committed or attempted to be committed by a
person eighteen years of age or older against a person less than
eighteen years of age, and before sentencing, may issue a securing order
and release the defendant on the defendant's own recognizance, release
the defendant under non-monetary conditions, or, where authorized, fix
bail, which may be in conjunction with the imposition of non-monetary
conditions, fix bail in a lesser amount or in a less burdensome form,
which may be in conjunction with the imposition of non-monetary
conditions, or issue a less restrictive securing order, than fixed by
the court in which the conviction was entered.
2. An order as prescribed in subdivision one may be issued by the
following judges in the indicated situations:
(a) If the criminal action was pending in supreme court or county
court, such order may be issued by a justice of the appellate division
of the department in which the conviction was entered.
(b) If the criminal action was pending in a local criminal court, such
order may be issued by a judge of a superior court holding a term
thereof in the county in which the conviction was entered.
2-a. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision four of section
510.10, paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 530.20 and
subdivision four of section 530.40 of this title, when a defendant
charged with an offense that is not such a qualifying offense is
convicted, whether by guilty plea or verdict, in such criminal action or
proceeding of an offense that is not a qualifying offense, the court
may, in accordance with law, issue a securing order: releasing the
defendant on the defendant's own recognizance or under non-monetary
conditions where authorized, fix bail, or ordering non-monetary
conditions in conjunction with fixing bail, or remand the defendant to
the custody of the sheriff where authorized.
3. An application for an order specified in this section must be made
upon reasonable notice to the people, and the people must be accorded
adequate opportunity to appear in opposition thereto. Not more than one
application may be made pursuant to this section. Defendant must allege
in his application that he intends to take an appeal to an intermediate
appellate court immediately after sentence is pronounced.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, if within thirty
days after sentence the defendant has not taken an appeal to an
intermediate appellate court from the judgment or sentence, the
operation of such order terminates and the defendant must surrender
himself to the criminal court in which the judgment was entered in order
that execution of the judgment be commenced.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one, if within one
hundred twenty days after the filing of the notice of appeal such appeal
has not been brought to argument in or submitted to the intermediate
appellate court, the operation of such order terminates and the
defendant must surrender himself to the criminal court in which the
judgment was entered in order that execution of the judgment be
commenced or resumed; except that this subdivision does not apply where
the intermediate appellate court has (a) extended the time for argument
or submission of the appeal to a date beyond the specified period of one
hundred twenty days, and (b) upon application of the defendant,
expressly ordered that the operation of the order continue until the
date of the determination of the appeal or some other designated future
date or occurrence.
6. Where the defendant is at liberty during the pendency of an appeal
as a result of an order issued pursuant to this section, the
intermediate appellate court, upon affirmance of the judgment, must by
appropriate certificate remit the case to the criminal court in which
such judgment was entered. The criminal court must, upon at least two
days notice to the defendant, his surety and his attorney, promptly
direct the defendant to surrender himself to the criminal court in order
that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed, and if necessary
the criminal court may issue a bench warrant to secure his appearance.
Order of recognizance or bail; during pendency of appeal.
1. A judge who is otherwise authorized pursuant to section 460.50 or
section 460.60 to issue an order of recognizance or bail pending the
determination of an appeal, may do so unless the defendant received a
class A felony sentence or a sentence for any class B or class C felony
offense defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed
or attempted to be committed by a person eighteen years of age or older
against a person less than eighteen years of age.
2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision four of section
510.10, paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 530.20 and
subdivision four of section 530.40 of this title, when a defendant
charged with an offense that is not such a qualifying offense applies,
pending determination of an appeal, for an order of recognizance or
release on non-monetary conditions, where authorized, fixing bail, or
ordering non-monetary conditions in conjunction with fixing bail, a
judge identified in subdivision two of section 460.50 or paragraph (a)
of subdivision one of section 460.60 of this chapter may, in accordance
with law, and except as otherwise provided by law, issue a securing
order: releasing the defendant on the defendant's own recognizance or
under non-monetary conditions where authorized, fixing bail, or ordering
non-monetary conditions in conjunction with fixing bail, or remanding
the defendant to the custody of the sheriff where authorized.
3. Where an appeal by the people has been taken from an order
dismissing one or more counts of an accusatory instrument for failure to
comply with a discovery order pursuant to subdivision twelve of section
450.20 of this chapter and the defendant is charged with a qualifying
offense in the remaining counts in the accusatory instrument, pending
determination of an appeal, the defendant may apply for an order of
recognizance or release on non-monetary conditions, where authorized,
fixing bail, or ordering non-monetary conditions in conjunction with
fixing bail. A judge identified in subdivision two of section 460.50 of
this chapter or paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section 460.60 of
this chapter may, in accordance with law, and except as otherwise
provided by law, issue a securing order releasing the defendant on the
defendant's own recognizance or under non-monetary conditions where
authorized, fixing bail, or ordering non-monetary conditions in
conjunction with fixing bail, or remanding the defendant to the custody
of the sheriff where authorized.
Certain modifications of a securing order.
1. Whenever in the course of a criminal action or proceeding a
defendant is at liberty as a result of an order of recognizance, release
under non-monetary conditions or bail issued pursuant to this chapter,
and the court considers it necessary to review such order, whether due
to a motion by the people or otherwise, the court may, and except as
provided in subdivision two of section 510.50 of this title concerning a
failure to appear in court, by a bench warrant if necessary, require the
defendant to appear before the court. Upon such appearance, the court,
for good cause shown, may revoke the order of recognizance, release
under non-monetary conditions, or bail. If the defendant is entitled to
recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions, or bail as a matter
of right, the court must issue another such order. If the defendant is
not, the court may either issue such an order or commit the defendant to
the custody of the sheriff in accordance with this section.
Where the defendant is committed to the custody of the sheriff and is
held on a felony complaint, a new period as provided in section 180.80
of this chapter shall commence to run from the time of the defendant's
commitment under this subdivision.
2. (a) Whenever in the course of a criminal action or proceeding a
defendant charged with the commission of a felony is at liberty as a
result of an order of recognizance, release under non-monetary
conditions or bail issued pursuant to this article it shall be grounds
for revoking such order that the court finds reasonable cause to believe
the defendant committed one or more specified class A or violent felony
offenses or intimidated a victim or witness in violation of section
215.15, 215.16 or 215.17 of the penal law while at liberty.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this subdivision or any
other law, whenever in the course of a criminal action or proceeding a
defendant charged with the commission of an offense is at liberty as a
result of a securing order issued pursuant to this article it shall be
grounds for revoking such order and imposing a new securing order in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this subdivision, the basis for which
shall be made on the record or in writing, in such criminal action or
proceeding when the court has found, by clear and convincing evidence,
that the defendant:
(i) persistently and willfully failed to appear after notice of
scheduled appearances in the case before the court; or
(ii) violated an order of protection in the manner prohibited by
subdivision (b), (c) or (d) of section 215.51 of the penal law while at
liberty; or
(iii) stands charged in such criminal action or proceeding with a
misdemeanor or violation and, after being so charged, intimidated a
victim or witness in violation of section 215.15, 215.16 or 215.17 of
the penal law or tampered with a witness in violation of section 215.11,
215.12 or 215.13 of the penal law, law while at liberty; or
(iv) stands charged in such action or proceeding with a felony and,
after being so charged, committed a felony while at liberty.
(c) Before revoking an order of recognizance, release under
non-monetary conditions, or bail pursuant to this subdivision, the court
must hold a hearing and shall receive any relevant, admissible evidence
not legally privileged. The defendant may cross-examine witnesses and
may present relevant, admissible evidence on his own behalf. Such
hearing may be consolidated with, and conducted at the same time as, a
felony hearing conducted pursuant to article one hundred eighty of this
chapter. A transcript of testimony taken before the grand jury upon
presentation of the subsequent offense shall be admissible as evidence
during the hearing. The district attorney may move to introduce grand
jury testimony of a witness in lieu of that witness' appearance at the
hearing.
(d) Revocation of an order of recognizance, release under non-monetary
conditions or bail and a new securing order fixing bail or commitment,
as specified in this paragraph and pursuant to this subdivision shall be
for the following periods:
(i) Under paragraph (a) of this subdivision, revocation of the order
of recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions or, as the case
may be, bail, and a new securing order fixing bail or committing the
defendant to the custody of the sheriff shall be as follows:
(A) For a period not to exceed ninety days exclusive of any periods of
adjournment requested by the defendant; or
(B) Until the charges contained within the accusatory instrument have
been reduced or dismissed such that no count remains which charges the
defendant with commission of a felony; or
(C) Until reduction or dismissal of the charges contained within the
accusatory instrument charging the subsequent offense such that no count
remains which charges the defendant with commission of a class A or
violent felony offense.
Upon expiration of any of the three periods specified within this
subparagraph, whichever is shortest, the court may grant or deny release
upon an order of bail or recognizance in accordance with the provisions
of this article. Upon conviction to an offense the provisions of article
five hundred thirty of this chapter shall apply;
(ii) Under subparagraph (i) of paragraph (b) of this subdivision,
revocation of a previously issued securing order shall result in the
issuance of a new securing order which may, if otherwise authorized by
law, permit the principal's release on recognizance or release under
non-monetary conditions, but shall also render the defendant eligible
for an order fixing bail, or ordering non-monetary conditions in
conjunction with fixing bail, provided, however, that in accordance with
the principles in this title the court must impose a new securing order
in accordance with subdivision one of section 510.10 of this title, and
in imposing such order, may consider the circumstances warranting such
revocation. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be interpreted as
shortening the period of detention, or requiring or authorizing any less
restrictive form of a securing order, which may be imposed pursuant to
any other law; and
(iii) Under subparagraphs (ii), (iii), and (iv) of paragraph (b) of
this subdivision, revocation of a previously issued securing order shall
result in the issuance of a new securing order which may, if otherwise
authorized by law, permit the principal's release on recognizance or
release under non-monetary conditions, but shall also render the
defendant eligible for an order fixing bail or ordering non-monetary
conditions in conjunction with fixing bail. In issuing the new securing
order, the court shall consider the kind and degree of control or
restriction necessary to reasonably assure the principal's return to
court and compliance with court conditions, and select a securing order
consistent with its determination, taking into account the factors
required to be considered under subdivision one of section 510.10 of
this title, the circumstances warranting such revocation, and the nature
and extent of the principal's noncompliance with previously ordered
non-monetary conditions of the securing order subject to revocation
under this subdivision. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be
interpreted as shortening the period of detention, or requiring or
authorizing any less restrictive form of a securing order, which may be
imposed pursuant to any other law.
(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) or (b) of this
subdivision a defendant, against whom a felony complaint has been filed
which charges the defendant with commission of a class A or violent
felony offense or violation of section 215.15, 215.16 or 215.17 of the
penal law committed while he was at liberty as specified therein, may be
committed to the custody of the sheriff pending a revocation hearing for
a period not to exceed seventy-two hours. An additional period not to
exceed seventy-two hours may be granted by the court upon application of
the district attorney upon a showing of good cause or where the failure
to commence the hearing was due to the defendant's request or occurred
with his consent. Such good cause must consist of some compelling fact
or circumstance which precluded conducting the hearing within the
initial prescribed period.
Order of recognizance or bail; bench warrant.
1. A bench warrant issued by a superior court, by a district court, by
the New York City criminal court or by a superior court judge sitting as
a local criminal court may be executed anywhere in the state. A bench
warrant issued by a city court, a town court or a village court may be
executed in the county of issuance or any adjoining county; and it may
be executed anywhere else in the state upon the written endorsement
thereon of a local criminal court of the county in which the defendant
is to be taken into custody. When so endorsed, the warrant is deemed the
process of the endorsing court as well as that of the issuing court.
2. A bench warrant may be addressed to: (a) any police officer whose
geographical area of employment embraces either the place where the
offense charged was allegedly committed or the locality of the court by
which the warrant is issued; or (b) any uniformed court officer for a
court in the city of New York, the county of Nassau, the county of
Suffolk or the county of Westchester or for any other court that is part
of the unified court system of the state for execution in the building
wherein such court officer is employed or in the immediate vicinity
thereof. A bench warrant must be executed in the same manner as a
warrant of arrest, as provided in section 120.80, and following the
arrest, such executing police officer or court officer must without
unnecessary delay bring the defendant before the court in which it is
returnable; provided, however, if the court in which the bench warrant
is returnable is a city, town or village court, and such court is not
available, and the bench warrant is addressed to a police officer, such
executing police officer must without unnecessary delay bring the
defendant before an alternate local criminal court, as provided in
subdivision five of section 120.90; or if the court in which the bench
warrant is returnable is a superior court, and such court is not
available, and the bench warrant is addressed to a police officer, such
executing police officer may bring the defendant to the local
correctional facility of the county in which such court sits, to be
detained there until not later than the commencement of the next session
of such court occurring on the next business day.
2-a. A court which issues a bench warrant may attach thereto a summary
of the basis for the warrant. In any case where, pursuant to subdivision
two of this section, a defendant arrested upon a bench warrant is
brought before a local criminal court other than the court in which the
warrant is returnable, such local criminal court shall consider such
summary before issuing a securing order with respect to the defendant.
3. A bench warrant may be executed by (a) any officer to whom it is
addressed, or (b) any other police officer delegated to execute it under
circumstances prescribed in subdivisions four and five.
4. The issuing court may authorize the delegation of such warrant.
Where the issuing court has so authorized, a police officer to whom a
bench warrant is addressed may delegate another police officer to whom
it is not addressed to execute such warrant as his or her agent when:
(a) He or she has reasonable cause to believe that the defendant is in
a particular county other than the one in which the warrant is
returnable; and
(b) The geographical area of employment of the delegated police
officer embraces the locality where the arrest is to be made.
5. Under circumstances specified in subdivision four, the police
officer to whom the bench warrant is addressed may inform the delegated
officer, by telecommunication, mail or any other means, of the issuance
of the warrant, of the offense charged in the underlying accusatory
instrument and of all other pertinent details, and may request him or
her to act as his or her agent in arresting the defendant pursuant to
such bench warrant. Upon such request, the delegated police officer is
to the same extent as the delegating officer, authorized to make such
arrest pursuant to the bench warrant within the geographical area of
such delegated officer's employment. Upon so arresting the defendant, he
or she must without unnecessary delay deliver the defendant or cause him
or her to be delivered to the custody of the police officer by whom he
or she was so delegated, and the latter must then without unnecessary
delay bring the defendant before the court in which such bench warrant
is returnable.
6. A bench warrant may be executed by an officer of the state
department of corrections and community supervision or a probation
officer when the person named within the warrant is under the
supervision of the department of corrections and community supervision
or a department of probation and the probation officer is authorized by
his or her probation director, as the case may be. The warrant must be
executed upon the same conditions and in the same manner as is otherwise
provided for execution by a police officer.
Order of recognizance or bail; surrender of defendant.
1. At any time before the forfeiture of a bail bond, an obligor may
surrender the defendant in his exoneration, or the defendant may
surrender himself, to the court in which his case is pending or to the
sheriff to whose custody he was committed at the time of giving bail, in
the following manner:
(a) A certified copy of the bail bond must be delivered to the
sheriff, who must detain the defendant in his custody thereon, as upon a
commitment. The sheriff must acknowledge the surrender by a certificate
in writing, and must forthwith notify the court in which the case is
pending that such surrender has been made.
(b) Upon the bail bond and the certificate of the sheriff, or upon
the surrender to the court in which the case is pending, such court
must, upon five days notice to the district attorney, order that the
bail be exonerated. On filing such order, the bail is exonerated
accordingly.
2. For the purpose of surrendering the defendant, an obligor or the
person who posted cash bail for the defendant may take him into custody
at any place within the state, or he may, by a written authority
indorsed on a certified copy of the bail bond, empower any person over
twenty years of age to do so.
3. At any time before the forfeiture of cash bail, the defendant may
surrender himself or the person who posted bail for the defendant may
surrender the defendant in the manner prescribed in subdivision one. In
such case, the court must order a return of the money to the person who
posted it, upon producing the certificate of the sheriff showing the
surrender, and upon a notice of five days to the district attorney.
ARTICLE 540 Forfeiture of Bail and Remission Thereof
Forfeiture of bail; generally.
1. If, without sufficient excuse, a principal does not appear when
required or does not render himself amenable to the orders and processes
of the criminal court wherein bail has been posted, the court must enter
such facts upon its minutes and the bail bond or the cash bail, as the
case may be, is thereupon forfeited.
2. If the principal appears at any time before the final adjournment
of the court, and satisfactorily excuses his neglect, the court may
direct the forfeiture to be discharged upon such terms as are just. If
the forfeiture is not so discharged and the forfeited bail consisted of
a bail bond, the district attorney, within one hundred twenty days after
the adjournment of the court at which such bond was directed to be
forfeited, must proceed against the obligor or obligors who executed
such bond, in the manner prescribed in subdivision three. If the
forfeited bail consisted of cash bail, the county treasurer with whom it
is deposited shall give written notice of the forfeiture to the person
who posted cash bail for the defendant may at any time after the final
adjournment of the court or forty-five days after notice of forfeiture
required herein has been given, whichever comes later, apply the money
deposited to the use of the county.
3. A bail bond or cash bail, upon being forfeited, together with a
certified copy of the order of the court forfeiting the same, must be
filed by the district attorney in the office of the clerk of the county
wherein such order was issued. Such clerk must docket the same in the
book kept by him for docketing of judgments and enter therein a judgment
against the obligor or obligors who executed such bail bond for the
amount of the penalty of said bond or against the person who posted the
cash bail for the amount of the cash bail, and the bond and the
certified copy of the order of the court forfeiting the bond or the cash
bail constitutes the judgment roll. Such judgment constitutes a lien on
the real estate of the obligor or obligors who executed such bail bond
from the time of the entry of the judgment. An execution may be issued
to collect the amount of said bail bond in the same form and with the
same effect as upon a judgment recovered in an action in said county
upon a debt in favor of the people of the state of New York against such
obligor or obligors.
Forfeiture of bail; certain local criminal courts.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 540.10, when bail has been
posted in a city court, town court or village court in connection with a
local criminal court accusatory instrument, other than a felony
complaint, and thereafter such bail is forfeited, the following rules
are applicable:
1. If such bail consists of a bail bond, the financial officer of
such city, town or village must promptly commence an action for the
recovery of the sum of money specified in such bond, and upon collection
thereof shall pay the same over to the treasurer or financial officer of
the city, the supervisor of the town or the treasurer of the village.
Any amount recovered in such action, unless otherwise provided by law,
shall be the property of the city, town or village in which the offense
charged is alleged to have been committed.
2. If such bail consists of cash bail, the local criminal court must:
(a) If it is a city court, pay the forfeited bail to the treasurer or
other financial officer of the city. Such forfeited bail, unless
otherwise provided by law, is the property of such city.
(b) If it is a town court or a village court, pay the forfeited bail
to the state comptroller on or before the tenth day of the month next
succeeding such forfeiture. Such forfeited bail, unless otherwise
provided by law, is the property of the town or village in which the
offense charged is alleged to have been committed; provided, however,
that when (i) a single amount of bail is posted for more than a single
offense charged, and (ii) the town or village justice court does not
attribute a specific amount of bail to each offense, and (iii) forfeited
bail for at least two of the offenses would be the property of different
governmental entities, the entire amount of forfeited bail shall be the
property of the town or village in which the offenses charged are
alleged to have been committed, except that, when forfeited bail for at
least one of the offenses would be the property of the state, the entire
amount of forfeited bail shall be the property of the state.
Remission of forfeiture.
1. After the forfeiture of a bail bond or cash bail, as provided in
section 540.10, an application for remission of such forfeiture may be
made to a court as follows:
(a) If the forfeiture has been ordered by a superior court, the
application must be made in such court;
(b) If the forfeiture has been ordered by a local criminal court, the
application must be made to a superior court in the county, except that
if the local criminal court which ordered the forfeiture was a district
court, the application may alternatively be made to that district court.
2. The application must be made within one year after the forfeiture
of the bail is declared upon at least five days notice to the district
attorney and service of copies of the affidavits and papers upon which
the application is founded. The court may grant the application and
remit the forfeiture or any part thereof, upon such terms as are just.
The application may be granted only upon payment of the costs and
expenses incurred in the proceedings for the enforcement of the
forfeiture.
TITLE Q Procedures For Securing Attendance At Criminal Actions and Proceedings of Defendants Not Securable By Conventional Means--and Related Matters
ARTICLE 550 Securing Attendance of Defendants--in General
Securing attendance of defendants; in general.
Depending upon the status of a criminal action pending against a
defendant, the geographical location of the defendant at the time and
other factors, his attendance thereat for purposes of arraignment or
prosecution may be secured by the following methods:
1. If the defendant has never been arraigned in the action, and if he
is at liberty within the state, his attendance may, under given
circumstances, be secured by a warrant of arrest, as prescribed in
article one hundred twenty, a superior court warrant of arrest, as
prescribed in subdivision three of section 210.10, or a summons, as
prescribed in article one hundred thirty.
2. If the defendant has been arraigned in the action and, by virtue
of a securing order, is either in the custody of the sheriff or at
liberty within the state on his own recognizance or on bail, his
attendance may be secured as follows:
(a) If the defendant is confined in the custody of the sheriff, the
court may direct the sheriff to produce him;
(b) If the defendant is at liberty within the state as a result of an
order releasing him on his own recognizance or on bail, the court may
secure his attendance by notification or by the issuance of a bench
warrant.
3. If the defendant's attendance cannot be secured by methods
described in subdivisions one and two, either because he is outside the
state or because he is confined in an institution within the state as a
result of an order issued in some other action, proceeding or matter,
his attendance may, under indicated circumstances, be secured by
procedures prescribed in the ensuing articles of this title.
ARTICLE 560 Securing Attendance of Defendants Confined In Institutions Within the State
Securing attendance of defendants confined in institutions
within the state.
1. When a criminal action is pending against a defendant who is
confined in an institution within the state pursuant to a court order
issued in a different action, proceeding or matter, the following courts
and judges may, under the indicated circumstances, order that the
defendant be produced in the court in which the criminal action is
pending for purposes of arraignment or prosecution therein:
(a) If the action is pending in a superior court or with a superior
court judge sitting as a local criminal court, or in a district court or
the New York City criminal court, such court may, upon application of
the district attorney, order the production therein of a defendant
confined in any institution within the state.
(b) If the action is pending in a city court or a town court or a
village court, such court may, upon application of the district
attorney, order production therein of a defendant confined in a county
jail of such county. Production therein of a defendant confined in any
other institution within the state may, upon application of the district
attorney, be ordered by a judge of a superior court holding a term
thereof in the county in which the action is pending.
2. An application by a district attorney, pursuant to subdivision
one, for production of a defendant confined in an institution located in
another county in connection with a criminal action or proceeding
pending in such other county, must be made upon reasonable notice to the
district attorney of such other county and to the attorney representing
such defendant in or in connection with the action or proceeding pending
therein, and the court or judge must accord them reasonable opportunity
to be heard in the matter. If such court or judge determines that
production of the defendant would result in an unreasonable interference
with the conduct of the action in such other county, it must deny the
application. If an order of production is issued, a justice of the
appellate division, of either the department embracing the county of
issuance thereof or of the department embracing the county of the
defendant's confinement, upon application of the district attorney of
the county of confinement or of the attorney representing the defendant
in or in connection with the action pending therein, may for good cause
shown vacate such order of production.
ARTICLE 570 Securing Attendance of Defendants Who Are Outside the State But Within the United States--rendition to Other Jurisdictions of Defendants Within the State--uniform Criminal Extradition Act
ARTICLE 580 Securing Attendance of Defendants Confined As Prisoners In Institutions of Other Jurisdictions of the United States--rendition to Other Jurisdictions of Persons Confined As Prisoners In This State--agreement On Detainers
Securing attendance of defendants confined as prisoners in
institutions of other jurisdictions of the United States;
methods.
The attendance in a criminal action pending in a court of this state
of a defendant confined as a prisoner in an institution of another
jurisdiction of the United States may, under prescribed circumstances,
be secured pursuant to:
1. Section 570.12 of article five hundred seventy, known as the
uniform criminal extradition act; or
2. Section 580.20, known as the agreement on detainers; or
3. Section 580.30.
Agreement on detainers.
The agreement on detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into
by this state with all other jurisdictions legally joining therein in
the form substantially as follows:
TEXT OF THE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS
The contracting states solemnly agree that:
ARTICLE I
The party states find that charges outstanding against a prisoner,
detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints, and
difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in
other jurisdictions, produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of
prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. Accordingly, it is the policy of
the party states and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the
expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of
the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments,
informations or complaints. The party states also find that proceedings
with reference to such charges and detainers, when emanating from
another jurisdiction, cannot properly be had in the absence of
cooperative procedures. It is the further purpose of this agreement to
provide such cooperative procedures.
ARTICLE II
As used in this agreement:
(a) "State" shall mean a state of the United States; the United
States of America; a territory or possession of the United States; the
District of Columbia; the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(b) "Sending state" shall mean a state in which a prisoner is
incarcerated at the time that he initiates a request for final
disposition pursuant to Article III hereof or at the time that a request
for custody or availability is initiated pursuant to Article IV hereof.
(c) "Receiving state" shall mean the state in which trial is to be
had on an indictment, information or complaint pursuant to Article III
or Article IV hereof.
ARTICLE III
(a) Whenever a person has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a
penal or correctional institution of a party state, and whenever during
the continuance of the term of imprisonment there is pending in any
other party state any untried indictment, information or complaint on
the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against the prisoner, he
shall be brought to trial within one hundred eighty days after he shall
have caused to be delivered to the prosecuting officer and the
appropriate court of the prosecuting officer's jurisdiction written
notice of the place of his imprisonment and his request for a final
disposition to be made of the indictment, information or complaint;
provided that for good cause shown in open court, the prisoner or his
counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction of the matter may
grant any necessary or reasonable continuance. The request of the
prisoner shall be accompanied by a certificate of the appropriate
official having custody of the prisoner, stating the term of commitment
under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the
time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time
earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and any
decisions of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner.
(b) The written notice and request for final disposition referred to
in paragraph (a) hereof shall be given or sent by the prisoner to the
warden, commissioner of correction or other official having custody of
him, who shall promptly forward it together with the certificate to the
appropriate prosecuting official and court by registered or certified
mail, return receipt requested.
(c) The warden, commissioner of correction or other official having
custody of the prisoner shall promptly inform him of the source and
contents of any detainer lodged against him and shall also inform him of
his right to make a request for final disposition of the indictment,
information or complaint on which the detainer is based.
(d) Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to
paragraph (a) hereof shall operate as a request for final disposition of
all untried indictments, informations or complaints on the basis of
which detainers have been lodged against the prisoner from the state to
whose prosecuting official the request for final disposition is
specifically directed. The warden, commissioner of correction or other
official having custody of the prisoner shall forthwith notify all
appropriate prosecuting officers and courts in the several jurisdictions
within the state to which the prisoner's request for final disposition
is being sent of the proceeding being initiated by the prisoner. Any
notification sent pursuant to this paragraph shall be accompanied by
copies of the prisoner's written notice, request, and the certificate.
If trial is not had on any indictment, information or complaint
contemplated hereby prior to the return of the prisoner to the original
place of imprisonment, such indictment, information or complaint shall
not be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an
order dismissing the same with prejudice.
(e) Any request for final disposition made by a prisoner pursuant to
paragraph (a) hereof shall also be deemed to be a waiver of extradition
with respect to any charge or proceeding contemplated thereby or
included therein by reason of paragraph (d) hereof, and a waiver of
extradition to the receiving state to serve any sentence there imposed
upon him, after completion of his term of imprisonment in the sending
state. The request for final disposition shall also constitute a
consent by the prisoner to the production of his body in any court where
his presence may be required in order to effectuate the purposes of this
agreement and a further consent voluntarily to be returned to the
original place of imprisonment in accordance with the provisions of this
agreement. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the imposition of a
concurrent sentence if otherwise permitted by law.
(f) Escape from custody by the prisoner subsequent to his execution
of the request for final disposition referred to in paragraph (a) hereof
shall void the request.
ARTICLE IV
(a) The appropriate officer of the jurisdiction in which an untried
indictment, information or complaint is pending shall be entitled to
have a prisoner against whom he has lodged a detainer and who is serving
a term of imprisonment in any party state made available in accordance
with Article V(a) hereof upon presentation of a written request for
temporary custody or availability to the appropriate authorities of the
state in which the prisoner is incarcerated; provided that the court
having jurisdiction of such indictment, information or complaint shall
have duly approved, recorded and transmitted the request; and provided
further that there shall be a period of thirty days after receipt by the
appropriate authorities before the request be honored, within which
period the governor of the sending state may disapprove the request for
temporary custody or availability, either upon his own motion or upon
motion of the prisoner.
(b) Upon receipt of the officer's written request as provided in
paragraph (a) hereof, the appropriate authorities having the prisoner in
custody shall furnish the officer with a certificate stating the term of
commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already
served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of
good time earned, the time of parole eligibility of the prisoner, and
any decisions of the state parole agency relating to the prisoner. Said
authorities simultaneously shall furnish all other officers and
appropriate courts in the receiving state who have lodged detainers
against the prisoner with similar certificates and with notices
informing them of the request for custody or availability and of the
reasons therefor.
(c) In respect of any proceeding made possible by this Article, trial
shall be commenced within one hundred twenty days of the arrival of the
prisoner in the receiving state, but for good cause shown in open court,
the prisoner or his counsel being present, the court having jurisdiction
of the matter may grant any necessary or reasonable continuance.
(d) Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to deprive
any prisoner of any right which he may have to contest the legality of
his delivery as provided in paragraph (a) hereof but such delivery may
not be opposed or denied on the ground that the executive authority of
the sending state has not affirmatively consented to or ordered such
delivery.
(e) If trial is not had on any indictment, information or complaint
contemplated hereby prior to the prisoner's being returned to the
original place of imprisonment pursuant to Article V(e) hereof, such
indictment, information or complaint shall not be of any further force
or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with
prejudice.
ARTICLE V
(a) In response to a request made under Article III or Article IV
hereof, the appropriate authority in a sending state shall offer to
deliver temporary custody of such prisoner to the appropriate authority
in the state where such indictment, information or complaint is pending
against such person in order that speedy and efficient prosecution may
be had. If the request for final disposition is made by the prisoner,
the offer of temporary custody shall accompany the written notice
provided for in Article III of this agreement. In the case of a federal
prisoner, the appropriate authority in receiving state shall be entitled
to temporary custody as provided by this agreement or to the prisoner's
presence in federal custody at the place for trial, whichever custodial
arrangement may be approved by the custodian.
(b) The officer or other representative of a state accepting an offer
of temporary custody shall present the following upon demand:
(1) Proper identification and evidence of his authority to act for
the state into whose temporary custody the prisoner is to be given.
(2) A duly certified copy of the indictment, information or complaint
on the basis of which the detainer has been lodged and on the basis of
which the request for temporary custody of the prisoner has been made.
(c) If the appropriate authority shall refuse or fail to accept
temporary custody of said person, or in the event that an action on the
indictment, information or complaint on the basis of which the detainer
has been lodged is not brought to trial within the period provided in
Article III or Article IV hereof, the appropriate court of the
jurisdiction where the indictment, information or complaint has been
pending shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice, and any
detainer based thereon shall cease to be of any force or effect.
(d) The temporary custody referred to in this agreement shall be only
for the purpose of permitting prosecution on the charge or charges
contained in one or more untried indictments, informations or complaints
which form the basis of the detainer or detainers or for prosecution on
any other charge or charges arising out of the same transaction. Except
for his attendance at court and while being transported to or from any
place at which his presence may be required, the prisoner shall be held
in a suitable jail or other facility regularly used for persons awaiting
prosecution.
(e) At the earliest practicable time consonant with the purposes of
this agreement, the prisoner shall be returned to the sending state.
(f) During the continuance of temporary custody or while the prisoner
is otherwise being made available for trial as required by this
agreement, time being served on the sentence shall continue to run but
good time shall be earned by the prisoner only if, and to the extent
that, the law and practice of the jurisdiction which imposed the
sentence may allow.
(g) For all purposes other than that for which temporary custody as
provided in this agreement is exercised, the prisoner shall be deemed to
remain in the custody of and subject to the jurisdiction of the sending
state and any escape from temporary custody may be dealt with in the
same manner as an escape from the original place of imprisonment or in
any other manner permitted by law.
(h) From the time that a party state receives custody of a prisoner
pursuant to this agreement until such prisoner is returned to the
territory and custody of the sending state, the state in which the one
or more untried indictments, informations or complaints are pending or
in which trial is being had shall be responsible for the prisoner and
shall also pay all costs of transporting, caring for, keeping and
returning the prisoner. The provisions of this paragraph shall govern
unless the states concerned shall have entered into a supplementary
agreement providing for a different allocation of costs and
responsibilities as between or among themselves. Nothing herein
contained shall be construed to alter or affect any internal
relationship among the departments, agencies and officers of and in the
government of a party state, or between a party state and its
subdivisions, as to the payment of costs, or responsibilities therefor.
ARTICLE VI
(a) In determining the duration and expiration dates of the time
periods provided in Articles III and IV of this agreement, the running
of said time periods shall be tolled whenever and for as long as the
prisoner is unable to stand trial, as determined by the court having
jurisdiction of the matter.
(b) No provision of this agreement, and no remedy made available by
this agreement, shall apply to any person who is adjudged to be mentally
ill.
ARTICLE VII
Each state party to this agreement shall designate an officer who,
acting jointly with like officers of other party states, shall
promulgate rules and regulations to carry out more effectively the terms
and provisions of this agreement, and who shall provide, within and
without the state, information necessary to the effective operation of
this agreement.
ARTICLE VIII
This agreement shall enter into full force and effect as to a party
state when such state has enacted the same into law. A state party to
this agreement may withdraw herefrom by enacting a statute repealing the
same. However, the withdrawal of any state shall not affect the status
of any proceedings already initiated by incarcerated individuals or by
state officers at the time such withdrawal takes effect, nor shall it
affect their rights in respect thereof.
ARTICLE IX
1. This agreement shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate
its purposes. The provisions of this agreement shall be severable and
if any phrase, clause, sentence or provision of this agreement is
declared to be contrary to the constitution of any party state or of the
United States or the applicability thereof to any government, agency,
person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of
this agreement and the applicability thereof to any government, agency,
person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this agreement
shall be held contrary to the constitution of any state party hereto,
the agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining
states and in full force and effect as to the state affected as to all
severable matters.
2. The phrase "appropriate court" as used in the agreement on
detainers shall, with reference to the courts of this state, mean any
court with criminal jurisdiction.
3. All courts, departments, agencies, officers and employees of this
state and its political subdivisions are hereby directed to enforce the
agreement on detainers and to cooperate with one another and with other
party states in enforcing the agreement and effectuating its purposes.
4. Escape from custody while in another state pursuant to the
agreement on detainers shall constitute an offense against the laws of
this state to the same extent and degree as an escape from the
institution in which the prisoner was confined immediately prior to
having been sent to another state pursuant to the provisions of the
agreement on detainers and shall be punishable in the same manner as an
escape from said institution.
5. It shall be lawful and mandatory upon the warden or other official
in charge of a penal or correctional institution in this state to give
over the person of any incarcerated individual thereof whenever so
required by the operation of the agreement on detainers.
6. The governor is hereby authorized and empowered to designate an
administrator who shall perform the duties and functions and exercise
the powers conferred upon such person by Article VII of the agreement on
detainers.
7. In order to implement Article IV(a) of the agreement on detainers,
and in furtherance of its purposes, the appropriate authorities having
custody of the prisoner shall, promptly upon receipt of the officer's
written request, notify the prisoner and the governor in writing that a
request for temporary custody has been made and such notification shall
describe the source and contents of said request. The authorities
having custody of the prisoner shall also advise him in writing of his
rights to counsel, to make representations to the governor within thirty
days, and to contest the legality of his delivery.
Securing attendance of defendants confined in federal prisons.
1. A defendant against whom a criminal action is pending in a court
of record of this state, and who is confined in a federal prison or
custody either within or outside the state, may, with the consent of the
attorney general of the United States, be produced in such court for the
purpose of criminal prosecution, pursuant to the provisions of:
(a) Section four thousand eighty-five of title eighteen of the United
States Code; or
(b) Subdivision two of this section.
2. When such a defendant is in federal custody as specified in
subdivision one, a superior court, at a term held in the county in which
the criminal action against him is pending, may, upon application of the
district attorney of such county, issue a certificate, known as a writ
of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, addressed to the attorney general of
the United States, certifying that such defendant has been charged by
the particular accusatory instrument filed against him in the specified
court with the offense or offenses alleged therein, and that attendance
of the defendant in such court for the purpose of criminal prosecution
thereon is necessary in the interest of justice, and requesting the
attorney general of the United States to cause such defendant to be
produced in such court, under custody of a federal public servant, upon
a designated date and for a period of time necessary to complete the
prosecution. Upon issuing such a certificate, the court may deliver it,
or cause or authorize it to be delivered, together with a certified copy
of the accusatory instrument upon which it is based, to the attorney
general of the United States or to his representative authorized to
entertain the request.
ARTICLE 590 Securing Attendance of Defendants Who Are Outside the United States
Securing attendance of defendants who are outside the United
States.
1. When a criminal action for an offense committed in this state is
pending in a criminal court of this state against a defendant who is in
a foreign country with which the United States has an extradition
treaty, and when the accusatory instrument charges an offense which is
declared in such treaty to be an extraditable one, the district attorney
of the county in which such offense was allegedly committed may make an
application to the Governor, requesting him to make an application to
the President of the United States to institute extradition proceedings
for the return of the defendant to this country and state for the
purpose of prosecution of such action. The district attorney's
application must comply with rules, regulations and guidelines
established by the Governor for such applications and must be
accompanied by all the accusatory instruments, affidavits and other
documents required by such rules, regulations and guidelines.
2. Upon receipt of the district attorney's application, the Governor,
if satisfied that the defendant is in the foreign country in question,
that the offense charged is an extraditable one pursuant to the treaty
in question, and that there are no factors or impediments which in law
preclude such an extradition, may in his discretion make an application,
addressed to the secretary of state of the United States, requesting
that the President of the United States institute extradition
proceedings for the return of the defendant from such foreign country.
The Governor's application must comply with rules, regulations and
guidelines established by the secretary of state for such applications
and must be accompanied by all the accusatory instruments, affidavits
and other documents required by such rules, regulations and guidelines.
3. If the Governor's application is granted and the extradition is
achieved or attempted, all expenses incurred therein must be borne by
the county from which the application emanated.
4. The provisions of this section apply equally to extradition or
attempted extradition of a person who is a fugitive following the entry
of a judgment of conviction against him in a criminal court of this
state.
ARTICLE 600 Securing Attendance of Corporate Defendants and Related Matters
Corporate defendants; securing attendance.
1. The court attendance of a corporation for purposes of commencing
or prosecuting a criminal action against it may be accomplished by the
issuance and service of a summons or an appearance ticket if such action
has been or is about to be commenced in a local criminal court, and by a
corporate summons if such action has been commenced in a superior court.
Such process must be served upon the corporation by delivery thereof to
an officer, director, managing or general agent, or cashier or assistant
cashier of such corporation or to any other agent of such corporation
authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.
2. A "corporate summons" is a process issued by a superior court
directing a corporate defendant designated in an indictment to appear
before it at a designated future time in connection with such
indictment. A corporate summons must be generally in the form of a
summons as prescribed in subdivision two of section 130.10. A corporate
summons may be served by a public servant designated by the issuing
court, and may be served anywhere in the state.
Corporate defendants; prosecution thereof.
At all stages of a criminal action, from the commencement thereof
through sentence, a corporate defendant must appear by counsel. Upon
failure of appearance at the time such defendant is required to enter a
plea to the accusatory instrument, the court may enter a plea of guilty
and impose sentence.
TITLE R Procedures For Securing Attendance of Witnesses In Criminal Actions
ARTICLE 610 Securing Attendance of Witnesses By Subpoena
Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; in general.
1. Under circumstances prescribed in this article, a person at
liberty within the state may be required to attend a criminal court
action or proceeding as a witness by the issuance and service upon him
of a subpoena.
2. A "subpoena" is a process of a court directing the person to whom
it is addressed to attend and appear as a witness in a designated action
or proceeding in such court, on a designated date and any recessed or
adjourned date of the action or proceeding. If the witness is given
reasonable notice of such recess or adjournment, no further process is
required to compel his attendance on the adjourned date.
3. As used in this article, "subpoena" includes a "subpoena duces
tecum." A subpoena duces tecum is a subpoena requiring the witness to
bring with him and produce specified physical evidence.
Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; when and by whom
subpoena may be issued.
1. Any criminal court may issue a subpoena for the attendance of a
witness in any criminal action or proceeding in such court.
2. A district attorney, or other prosecutor where appropriate, as an
officer of a criminal court in which he is conducting the prosecution of
a criminal action or proceeding, may issue a subpoena of such court,
subscribed by himself, for the attendance in such court or a grand jury
thereof of any witness whom the people are entitled to call in such
action or proceeding.
3. An attorney for a defendant in a criminal action or proceeding, as
an officer of a criminal court, may issue a subpoena of such court,
subscribed by himself, for the attendance in such court of any witness
whom the defendant is entitled to call in such action or proceeding. An
attorney for a defendant may not issue a subpoena duces tecum of the
court directed to any department, bureau or agency of the state or of a
political subdivision thereof, or to any officer or representative
thereof, unless the subpoena is indorsed by the court and provides at
least three days for the production of the requested materials. In the
case of an emergency, the court may by order dispense with the three-day
production period.
4. The showing required to sustain any subpoena under this section is
that the testimony or evidence sought is reasonably likely to be
relevant and material to the proceedings, and the subpoena is not
overbroad or unreasonably burdensome.
Securing attendance of witness by subpoena; possession of
physical evidence.
1. Where a subpoena duces tecum is issued on reasonable notice to the
person subpoenaed, the court or grand jury shall have the right to
possession of the subpoenaed evidence. Such evidence may be retained by
the court, grand jury or district attorney on behalf of the grand jury.
2. The possession shall be for a period of time, and on terms and
conditions, as may reasonably be required for the action or proceeding.
The reasonableness of such possession, time, terms, and conditions shall
be determined with consideration for, among other things, (a) the good
cause shown by the party issuing the subpoena or in whose behalf the
subpoena is issued, (b) the rights and legitimate needs of the person
subpoenaed and (c) the feasibility and appropriateness of making copies
of the evidence. The cost of reproduction and transportation incident
thereto shall be borne by the person or party issuing the subpoena
unless the court determines otherwise in the interest of justice.
Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prohibit the designation of a
return date for a subpoena duces tecum prior to trial. Where physical
evidence specified to be produced will be sought to be retained in
custody, notice of such fact shall be given the subpoenaed party. In
any case where the court receives or retains evidence prior to trial, it
may, as may otherwise be authorized by law, grant the issuing party a
reasonable opportunity to inspect such evidence.
Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; where subpoena
may be served.
1. A subpoena of any criminal court, issued pursuant to section
610.20, may be served anywhere in the county of issuance or anywhere in
an adjoining county.
2. A subpoena of a superior court or of a superior court judge
sitting as a local criminal court, issued pursuant to section 610.20,
may be served anywhere in the state.
3. A subpoena of a district court or of the New York City criminal
court, issued pursuant to section 610.20, may be served anywhere in the
state; provided that, if such subpoena is issued by a prosecutor or by
an attorney for a defendant, it may be served in a county other than the
county of issuance or an adjoining county only if such court, upon
application of such prosecutor or attorney, endorses upon such subpoena
an order for the attendance of the witness.
4. A subpoena of a city court or a town court or a village court,
issued pursuant to section 610.20, may be served in a county other than
the one of issuance or an adjoining county if a judge of a superior
court, upon application of the issuing court or the district attorney or
an attorney for the defendant, endorses upon such subpoena an order for
the attendance of the witness.
Securing attendance of witnesses by subpoena; how and by whom
subpoena may be served.
A subpoena may be served by any person more than eighteen years old.
Service must be made in the manner provided by the civil practice law
and rules for the service of subpoenas in civil cases.
Securing attendance of witness by subpoena; fees.
1. A witness subpoenaed by the people in a criminal action is
entitled to the same fees and mileage as a witness in a civil action,
payable by the treasurer of the county upon the certificate of the court
or the clerk thereof, stating the number of days the witness actually
attended and the number of miles traveled by him in order to attend. In
any such action, the court may, by order, direct the county treasurer to
pay to such witness a further reasonable sum for expenses, to be
specified in the order, and the county treasurer, upon the production of
the order or a certified copy thereof, must pay the witness the sum
specified therein out of the county treasury. Such certificates shall
only be issued by the court or the clerk thereof, upon the production of
the affidavit of the witness, stating that he attended as such either on
subpoena or request of the district attorney, the number of miles
necessarily traveled and the duration of attendance. An officer in any
state department who attends as a witness under this section in his
official capacity, or in consequence of any official action taken by
him, and who receives a fixed sum in lieu of expenses, or who is
entitled to receive the actual expenses incurred by him in the discharge
of his official duties, is not entitled to the compensation herein
provided.
2. A witness subpoenaed by the defendant in a criminal action is not
entitled as of right to witness and mileage fees, but the court may in
its discretion, by order, direct the county treasurer to pay to such a
witness a reasonable sum for expenses, to be specified in the order.
Upon the production of the order or a certified copy thereof, the county
treasurer must pay the witness the sum specified therein, out of the
county treasury.
ARTICLE 620 Securing Attendance of Witnesses By Material Witness Order
Material witness order; defined.
A material witness order is a court order (a) adjudging a person a
material witness in a pending criminal action and (b) fixing bail to
secure his future attendance thereat.
Material witness order; when authorized; by what courts
issuable; duration thereof.
1. A material witness order may be issued upon the ground that there
is reasonable cause to believe that a person whom the people or the
defendant desire to call as a witness in a pending criminal action:
(a) Possesses information material to the determination of such
action; and
(b) Will not be amenable or responsive to a subpoena at a time when
his attendance will be sought.
2. A material witness order may be issued only when:
(a) An indictment has been filed in a superior court and is currently
pending therein; or
(b) A grand jury proceeding has been commenced and is currently
pending; or
(c) A felony complaint has been filed with a local criminal court and
is currently pending therein.
3. The following courts may issue material witness orders under the
indicated circumstances:
(a) When an indictment has been filed, or a grand jury proceeding has
been commenced, or a defendant has been held by a local criminal court
for the action of a grand jury, a material witness order may be issued
only by the superior court in which such indictment is pending or by
which such grand jury has been or is to be impaneled;
(b) When a felony complaint is currently pending in a district court
or in the New York City criminal court or before a superior court judge
sitting as a local criminal court, a material witness order may be
issued either by such court or by the superior court which would have
jurisdiction of the case upon a holding of the defendant for the action
of the grand jury;
(c) When a felony complaint is currently pending in a city court or a
town court or a village court, a material witness order may be issued
only by the superior court which would have jurisdiction of the case
upon a holding of the defendant for the action of the grand jury.
4. Unless vacated pursuant to section 620.60, a material witness
order remains in effect during the following periods of time under the
indicated circumstances:
(a) An order issued by a superior court under the circumstances
prescribed in paragraph (a) of subdivision three remains in effect
during the pendency of the criminal action in such superior court;
(b) An order issued by a district court or the New York City criminal
court or a superior court judge sitting as a local criminal court, under
circumstances prescribed in paragraph (b) of subdivision three, remains
in effect (i) until the disposition of the felony complaint pending in
such court, and (ii) if the defendant is held for the action of a grand
jury, during the pendency of the grand jury proceeding, and (iii) if an
indictment results, for a period of ten days following the filing of
such indictment, and (iv) if within such ten day period such order is
indorsed by the superior court in which the indictment is pending,
during the pendency of the action in such superior court. Upon such
indorsement, the order is deemed to be that of the superior court.
(c) An order issued by a superior court under circumstances
prescribed in paragraph (c) of subdivision three remains in effect (i)
until the disposition of the felony complaint pending in the city, town
or village court, and (ii) if the defendant is held for the action of
the grand jury, during the pendency of the action in the superior court.
Material witness order; commencement of proceeding by
application; procurement of appearance of prospective
witness.
1. A proceeding to adjudge a person a material witness must be
commenced by application to the appropriate court, made in writing and
subscribed and sworn to by the applicant, demonstrating reasonable cause
to believe the existence of facts, as specified in subdivision one of
section 620.20, warranting the adjudication of such person as a material
witness.
2. If the court is satisfied that the application is well founded,
the prospective witness may be compelled to appear in response thereto
as follows:
(a) The court may issue an order directing him to appear therein at a
designated time in order that a determination may be made whether he
should be adjudged a material witness, and, upon personal service of
such order or a copy thereof within the state, he must so appear.
(b) If in addition to the allegations specified in subdivision one,
the application contains further allegations demonstrating to the
satisfaction of the court reasonable cause to believe that (i) the
witness would be unlikely to respond to such an order, or (ii) after
previously having been served with such an order, he did not respond
thereto, the court may issue a warrant addressed to a police officer,
directing such officer to take such prospective witness into custody
within the state and to bring him before the court forthwith in order
that a proceeding may be conducted to determine whether he is to be
adjudged a material witness.
Material witness order; arraignment.
1. When the prospective witness appears before the court, the court
must inform him of the nature and purpose of the proceeding, and that he
is entitled to a prompt hearing upon the issue of whether he should be
adjudged a material witness. The prospective witness possesses all the
rights, and is entitled to all the court instructions, with respect to
right to counsel, opportunity to obtain counsel and assignment of
counsel in case of financial inability to retain such, which, pursuant
to subdivisions three through five of section 180.10, accrue to a
defendant arraigned upon a felony complaint in a local criminal court.
2. If the proceeding is adjourned at the prospective witness'
instance, for the purpose of obtaining counsel or otherwise, the court
must order him to appear upon the adjourned date. The court may further
fix bail to secure his appearance upon such date or until the proceeding
is completed and, upon default thereof, may commit him to the custody of
the sheriff for such period.
Material witness order; hearing, determination and execution of
order.
1. The hearing upon the application must be conducted as follows:
(a) The applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the
evidence all facts essential to support a material witness order, and
any testimony so adduced must be given under oath;
(b) The prospective witness may testify under oath or may make an
unsworn statement;
(c) The prospective witness may call witnesses in his behalf, and the
court must cause process to be issued for any such witness whom he
reasonably wishes to call, and any testimony so adduced must be given
under oath;
(d) Upon the hearing, evidence tending to demonstrate that the
prospective witness does or does not possess information material to the
criminal action in issue, or that he will or will not be amenable or
respond to a subpoena at the time his attendance will be sought, is
admissible even though it consists of hearsay.
2. If the court is satisfied after such hearing that there is
reasonable cause to believe that the prospective witness (a) possesses
information material to the pending action or proceeding, and (b) will
not be amenable or respond to a subpoena at a time when his attendance
will be sought, it may issue a material witness order, adjudging him a
material witness and fixing bail to secure his future attendance.
3. A material witness order must be executed as follows:
(a) If the bail is posted and approved by the court, the witness must,
as provided in subdivision two of section 510.40 of this part, be
released and be permitted to remain at liberty; provided that, where the
bail is posted by a person other than the witness himself, he may not be
so released except upon his signed written consent thereto;
(b) If the bail is not posted, or if though posted it is not approved
by the court, the witness must, as provided in subdivision two of
section 510.40 of this part, be committed to the custody of the sheriff.
Material witness order; vacation, modification and amendment
thereof.
1. At any time after a material witness order has been issued the
court must, upon application of such witness, with notice to the party
upon whose application the order was issued, and with opportunity to be
heard, make inquiry whether by reason of new or changed facts or
circumstances the material witness order is no longer necessary or
warranted, or, if it is, whether the original bail currently appears
excessive. Upon making any such determination, the court must vacate
the order. If its determination is that the order is no longer
necessary or warranted, it must, as the situation requires, either
discharge the witness from custody or exonerate the bail. If its
determination is that the bail is excessive, it must issue a new order
fixing bail in a lesser amount or on less burdensome terms.
2. At any time when a witness is at liberty upon bail pursuant to a
material witness order, the court may, upon application of the party
upon whose application the order was issued, with notice to the witness
if possible and to his attorney if any and opportunity to be heard, make
inquiry whether, by reason of new or changed facts or circumstances, the
original bail is no longer sufficient to secure the future attendance of
the witness at the pending action. Upon making such a determination,
the court must vacate the order and issue a new order fixing bail in a
greater amount or on terms more likely to secure the future attendance
of the witness.
Material witness order; compelling attendance of witness who
fails to appear.
If a witness at liberty on bail pursuant to a material witness order
cannot be found or notified at the time his appearance as a witness is
required, or if after notification he fails to appear in such action or
proceeding as required, the court may issue a warrant, addressed to a
police officer, directing such officer to take such witness into custody
anywhere within the state and to bring him to the court forthwith.
Material witness order; witness fee.
A witness held in the custody of the sheriff as a result of a material
witness order must be paid the sum of three dollars per day for each day
of confinement in such custody. Such compensation is a county charge
and is payable upon release of such material witness from custody or, in
the discretion of the court, at any designated times or intervals during
the confinement as the court may deem appropriate.
ARTICLE 630 Securing Attendance As Witnesses of Persons Confined In Institutions Within the State
Securing attendance of witnesses confined in institutions
within the state; in general.
Under the circumstances prescribed in this article, a person confined
in an institution within this state pursuant to a court order may, upon
application of a party to a criminal action or proceeding, demonstrating
reasonable cause to believe that such person possesses information
material thereto, be produced by court order and compelled to attend
such action or proceeding as a witness.
Securing attendance of witnesses confined in institutions
within the state; when and by what courts order may be
issued.
The following courts and judges may, under the indicated
circumstances, order production as witnesses of persons confined by
court order in institutions within the state.
1. If the criminal action or proceeding is one pending in a superior
court or with a superior court judge sitting as a local criminal court,
such court may, except as provided in subdivision four, order the
production as a witness therein of a person confined in any institution
in the state.
2. If the criminal action or proceeding is one pending in a district
court or the New York City criminal court, such court may order the
production as a witness therein of a person confined in any institution
within the state other than a state prison. Production therein of a
prospective witness confined in a state prison may, except as provided
in subdivision four, be ordered, upon application of the party desiring
to call him, by a judge of a superior court holding a term thereof in
the county in which the action or proceeding is pending.
3. If the criminal action or proceeding is one pending in a city
court or a town court or a village court, such court may order the
production as a witness therein of a person confined in a county jail of
such county. Production therein of a prospective witness confined in
any other institution within the state may, except as provided in
subdivision four, be ordered, upon application of the party desiring to
call him, by a judge of a superior court holding a term thereof in the
county in which the action or proceeding is pending.
4. Regardless of the court in which the criminal action or proceeding
is pending, production as a witness therein of a prisoner who has been
sentenced to death may be ordered, upon application of the party
desiring to call him, only by a justice of the appellate division of the
department in which the action or proceeding is pending. The
application for such order, if made by the defendant, must be upon
notice to the district attorney of the county in which the action or
proceeding is pending, and an application made by either party must be
based upon a showing that the prisoner's attendance is clearly necessary
in the interests of justice. Upon issuing such an order, the appellate
division justice may fix and include therein any terms or conditions
which he deems appropriate for execution thereof.
ARTICLE 640 Securing Attendance As Witnesses of Persons At Liberty Outside the State--rendition to Other Jurisdictions of Witnesses At Liberty Within the State--uniform Act to Secure Attendance of Witnesses From Without the State In Criminal Cases
Securing attendance of witnesses from within and without the
state in criminal proceedings.
1. As used in this section the following words shall have the
following meanings unless the context requires otherwise.
"Witness" shall include a person whose testimony is desired in any
proceeding or investigation by a grand jury or in a criminal action,
prosecution or proceeding.
"State" shall include any territory of the United States and the
District of Columbia.
"Subpoena" shall include a summons in any state where a summons is
used in lieu of a subpoena.
2. Subpoenaing witness in this state to testify in another state. If a
judge of a court of record in any state which by its laws has made
provision for commanding persons within that state to attend and testify
in this state certifies under the seal of such court that there is a
criminal prosecution pending in such court, or that a grand jury
investigation has commenced or is about to commence, that a person being
within this state is a material witness in such prosecution, or grand
jury investigation, and that his presence will be required for a
specified number of days, upon presentation of such certificate to a
justice of the supreme court or a county judge in the county in which
such person is, such justice or judge shall fix a time and place for a
hearing, and shall make an order directing the witness to appear at a
time and place certain for the hearing.
If at such hearing the justice or judge determines that the witness is
material and necessary, that it will not cause undue hardship to the
witness to be compelled to attend and testify in the prosecution or a
grand jury investigation in the other state, and that the laws of the
state in which the prosecution is pending, or grand jury investigation
has commenced or is about to commence, will give to him protection from
arrest and the service of civil and criminal process, he shall issue a
subpoena, with a copy of the certificate attached, directing the witness
to attend and testify in the court where the prosecution is pending, or
where a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence
at a time and place specified in the subpoena. In any such hearing the
certificate shall be prima facie evidence of all the facts stated
therein.
If said certificate recommends that the witness be taken into
immediate custody and delivered to an officer of the requesting state to
assure his attendance in the requesting state such justice or judge may,
in lieu of notification of the hearing, direct that such witness be
forthwith brought before him for said hearing; and the justice or judge
at the hearing being satisfied of the desirability of such custody and
delivery, for which determination the certificate shall be prima facie
proof of such desirability may, in lieu of issuing subpoena, order that
said witness be forthwith taken into custody and delivered to an officer
of the requesting state.
If the witness, who is subpoenaed as above provided, after being paid
or tendered by some properly authorized person the sum of ten cents a
mile for each mile and five dollars for each day that he is required to
travel and attend as a witness fails without good cause to attend and
testify as directed in the subpoena, he shall be punished in the manner
provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a subpoena
issued from a court of record in this state.
3. Witness from another state subpoenaed to testify in this state. If
a person in any state, which by its laws has made provision for
commanding persons within its borders to attend and testify in criminal
prosecutions, or grand jury investigations commenced or about to
commence, in this state, is a material witness in a prosecution pending
in a court of record in this state, or in a grand jury investigation
which has commenced or is about to commence, a judge of such court may
issue a certificate under the seal of the court stating these facts and
specifying the number of days the witness will be required. This
certificate shall be presented to a judge of a court of record in the
county in which the witness is found.
If said certificate recommends that the witness be taken into
immediate custody and delivered to an officer of this state to assure
his attendance in this state, such judge may direct that such witness be
forthwith brought before him; and the judge being satisfied of the
desirability of such custody and delivery, for which determination said
certificate shall be prima facie proof, may order that said witness be
forthwith taken into custody and delivered to an officer of this state,
which order shall be sufficient authority to such officer to take such
witness into custody and hold him unless and until he may be released by
bail, recognizance, or order of the judge issuing the certificate.
If the witness is summoned to attend and testify in this state he
shall be tendered the sum of ten cents a mile for each mile and five
dollars for each day that he is required to travel and attend as a
witness. Such fees shall be a proper charge upon the county in which
such criminal prosecution or grand jury investigation is pending. A
witness who has appeared in accordance with the provisions of the
subpoena shall not be required to remain within this state a longer
period of time than the period mentioned in the certificate, unless
otherwise ordered by the court. If such witness fails without good cause
to attend and testify as directed in this subpoena, he shall be punished
in the manner provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a
subpoena issued from a court of record in this state.
4. Exemption from arrest and service of process. If a person comes
into this state in obedience to a subpoena directing him to attend and
testify in this state he shall not while in this state pursuant to such
subpoena or order be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil
or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his entrance
into this state under the subpoena.
If a person passes through this state while going to another state in
obedience to a subpoena or order to attend and testify in that state or
while returning therefrom, he shall not while so passing through this
state be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal,
in connection with matters which arose before his entrance into this
state under the subpoena or order.
5. Uniformity of interpretation. This section shall be so interpreted
and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the
law of the states which enact it.
6. Short title. This section may be cited as "Uniform act to secure
the attendance of witnesses from without the state in criminal cases."
7. Constitutionality. If any part of this section is for any reason
declared void, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
ARTICLE 650 Securing Attendance As Witnesses of Prisoners Confined In Institutions of Other Jurisdictions of the United States-- Rendition to Other Jurisdictions of Prisoners Confined In Institutions Within the State
TITLE S Procedures For Securing Testimony For Future Use, and For Using Testi- Mony Given In a Prior Proceeding
ARTICLE 660 Securing Testimony For Use In a Subsequent Proceeding--examination of Witnesses Conditionally
Examination of witnesses conditionally; in general.
After a defendant has been arraigned upon an accusatory instrument,
and under circumstances prescribed in this article, a criminal court
may, upon application of either the people or a defendant, order that a
witness or prospective witness in the action be examined conditionally
under oath in order that such testimony may be received into evidence at
subsequent proceedings in or related to the action.
Examination of witnesses conditionally; grounds for order.
An order directing examination of a witness conditionally must be
based upon the ground that there is reasonable cause to believe that
such witness:
1. Possesses information material to the criminal action or
proceeding in issue; and
2. Will not be amenable or responsive to legal process or available
as a witness at a time when his testimony will be sought, either because
he is:
(a) About to leave the state and not return for a substantial period
of time; or
(b) Physically ill or incapacited.
Examination of witnesses conditionally; when and to what
courts application may be made.
1. An application to examine a witness conditionally may be made at
any time after the defendant has been arraigned upon an accusatory
instrument and before termination of the action, or of a proceeding
therein or related thereto, in which the witness's testimony is sought.
2. Such application must be made to and determined by the following
courts under the indicated circumstances:
(a) If the action is pending in a local criminal court as a result of
an accusatory instrument filed therewith, the application must be made
to and determined by such local criminal court;
(b) If the defendant has been held by a local criminal court for the
action of a grand jury on the basis of a felony complaint, or if an
indictment has been filed against him, the application must be made to
and determined by the superior court by which the grand jury was or is
to be impaneled or in which the indictment is pending. If the superior
court by which the grand jury is to be impaneled is the supreme court,
the motion may, in the alternative, be made in the county court of the
county in which the action is pending.
Examination of witnesses conditionally; determination of
application.
1. Before ruling upon the application, the court may, in addition to
examining the papers and hearing oral argument, make any inquiry it
deems appropriate for the purpose of making findings of fact essential
to the determination. For such purpose, it may examine witnesses, under
oath or otherwise, subpoena or call witnesses and authorize the
attorneys for the parties to do so.
2. If the court is satisfied that grounds for the application exist,
it must order an examination of the witness conditionally at a
designated time and place. Such examination must be conducted by the
same court; except that, if it is to be held in another county, it may
be conducted by a designated superior court of such other county.
3. The court must order that the examination be recorded in the same
manner as would be required were the witness testifying at trial, and
the court may, in addition, order that the examination also be recorded
by videotape or other photographic method approved by and subject to
standards and administrative policies promulgated pursuant to section
twenty-eight of article six of the constitution.
4. Upon ordering the examination, the court must direct the party
securing the order of examination to serve a copy of the order upon the
respondent party and, if a defendant be such, upon his attorney also,
and must either issue a subpoena for the witness' attendance thereat or
authorize the applicant party's attorney to do so.
ARTICLE 670 Use In a Criminal Proceeding of Testimony Given In a Previous Proceeding
Use in a criminal proceeding of testimony given in a previous
proceeding; when authorized.
1. Under circumstances prescribed in this article, testimony given by
a witness at (a) a trial of an accusatory instrument, or (b) a hearing
upon a felony complaint conducted pursuant to section 180.60, or (c) an
examination of such witness conditionally, conducted pursuant to article
six hundred sixty, may, where otherwise admissible, be received into
evidence at a subsequent proceeding in or relating to the action
involved when at the time of such subsequent proceeding the witness is
unable to attend the same by reason of death, illness or incapacity, or
cannot with due diligence be found, or is outside the state or in
federal custody and cannot with due diligence be brought before the
court. Upon being received into evidence, such testimony may be read and
any videotape or photographic recording thereof played. Where any
recording is received into evidence, the stenographic transcript of that
examination shall also be received.
2. The subsequent proceedings at which such testimony may be received
in evidence consist of:
(a) Any proceeding constituting a part of a criminal action based
upon the charge or charges which were pending against the defendant at
the time of the witness's testimony and to which such testimony related;
and
(b) Any post-judgment proceeding in which a judgment of conviction
upon a charge specified in paragraph (a) is challenged.
Use in a criminal proceeding of testimony given in a previous
proceeding; procedure.
1. In any criminal action or proceeding other than a grand jury
proceeding, a party thereto who desires to offer in evidence testimony
of a witness given in a previous action or proceeding as provided in
section 670.10, must so move, either in writing or orally in open court,
and must submit to the court, and serve a copy thereof upon the adverse
party, an authenticated transcript of the testimony and any videotape or
photographic recording thereof sought to be introduced. Such moving
party must further state facts showing that personal attendance of the
witness in question is precluded by some factor specified in subdivision
one of section 670.10. In determining the motion, the court, with
opportunity for both parties to be heard, must make inquiry and conduct
a hearing to determine whether personal attendance of the witness is so
precluded. If the court determines that such is the case and grants the
motion, the moving party may introduce the transcript in evidence and
read into evidence the testimony contained therein. In such case, the
adverse party may register any objection or protest thereto that he
would be entitled to register were the witness testifying in person, and
the court must rule thereon.
2. Without obtaining any court order or authorization, a district
attorney may introduce in evidence in a grand jury proceeding testimony
of a witness given in a previous action or proceeding specified in
subdivision one of section 670.10, provided that a foundation for such
evidence is laid by other evidence demonstrating that personal
attendance of such witness is precluded by some factor specified in
subdivision one of section 670.10.
ARTICLE 680 Securing Testimony Outside the State For Use In Proceeding Within the State-- Examination of Witnesses On Commission
Examination of witnesses on commission; when commission
issuable; form and content of application.
1. Upon a pre-trial application of a defendant who has pleaded not
guilty to an indictment or other accusatory instrument which charges a
crime, the superior court in which such indictment is pending, or a
superior court in the county in which such other accusatory instrument
is pending, may issue a commission for examination of a designated
person as a witness in the action, at a designated place outside this
state, if it is satisfied that (a) such person possesses information
material to the action which in the interest of justice should be
disclosed at the trial, and (b) resides outside the state.
2. The application and moving papers must be in writing and must be
subscribed and sworn to by the defendant or his attorney. A copy
thereof must be served on the district attorney, with reasonable notice
and opportunity to be heard. The moving papers must allege:
(a) The offense or offenses charged; and
(b) The status of the action; and
(c) The name of the prospective witness; and
(d) A statement that such prospective witness resides outside the
state, and his address in the jurisdiction in which the examination
sought is to occur; and
(e) A statement that he possesses information material to the action
which in the interest of justice should be disclosed at the trial,
together with a brief summary of the facts supporting such statement.
3. An application for issuance of a commission may request
examination pursuant thereto of more than one person residing in the
particular jurisdiction. In such case, it must contain allegations
specified in subdivision two with respect to each such person, and the
court must make separate rulings as to each.
Examination of witnesses on commission; form and content of
the commission.
1. The commission must be subscribed by the court and must contain:
(a) The name and address of each witness to be examined; and
(b) The name, or a descriptive title, of a commissioner or
commissioners who, pursuant to subdivision two, are authorized to
conduct the examination; and
(c) A statement authorizing such commissioner or commissioners to
administer the oath to witnesses; and
(d) A direction that, upon completion of such examination, such
commissioner or commissioners cause it to be transcribed and remit to
the court the transcript, the commission, the interrogatories and all
other pertinent instruments and documents.
2. The following persons may be designated commissioners:
(a) If the examination is to occur within the United States or any
territory thereof, any attorney authorized to practice law in the
specified jurisdiction or any person authorized to administer oaths
therein;
(b) If the examination is to occur in a foreign country, any
diplomatic or consular agent or representative of the United States
employed in such capacity in such country, or any commissioned officer
of the armed forces.
3. The court must cause the commission to be delivered to a
commissioner designated therein, together with a copy of this article.
TITLE T Procedures For Securing Evidence By Means of Court Order and For Sup- Pressing Evidence Unlawfully or Improperly Obtained
ARTICLE 690 Search Warrants
Search warrants; in general; definition.
1. Under circumstances prescribed in this article, a local criminal
court may, upon application of a police officer, a district attorney or
other public servant acting in the course of his official duties, issue
a search warrant.
2. A search warrant is a court order and process directing a police
officer to conduct:
(a) a search of designated premises, or of a designated vehicle, or of
a designated person, for the purpose of seizing designated property or
kinds of property, and to deliver any property so obtained to the court
which issued the warrant; or
(b) a search of a designated premises for the purpose of searching for
and arresting a person who is the subject of: (i) a warrant of arrest
issued pursuant to this chapter, a superior court warrant of arrest
issued pursuant to this chapter, or a bench warrant for a felony issued
pursuant to this chapter, where the designated premises is the dwelling
of a third party who is not the subject of the arrest warrant; or
(ii) a warrant of arrest issued by any other state or federal court
for an offense which would constitute a felony under the laws of this
state, where the designated premises is the dwelling of a third party
who is not the subject of the arrest warrant.
Search warrants; property subject to seizure thereunder.
Personal property is subject to seizure pursuant to a search warrant
if there is reasonable cause to believe that it:
1. Is stolen; or
2. Is unlawfully possessed; or
3. Has been used, or is possessed for the purpose of being used, to
commit or conceal the commission of an offense against the laws of this
state or another state, provided however, that if such offense was
against the laws of another state, the court shall only issue a warrant
if the conduct comprising such offense would, if occurring in this
state, constitute a felony against the laws of this state; or
4. Constitutes evidence or tends to demonstrate that an offense was
committed in this state or another state, or that a particular person
participated in the commission of an offense in this state or another
state, provided however, that if such offense was against the laws of
another state, the court shall only issue a warrant if the conduct
comprising such offense would, if occurring in this state, constitute a
felony against the laws of this state.
Search warrants; where executable.
1. A search warrant issued by a district court, the New York City
criminal court or a superior court judge sitting as a local criminal
court may be executed pursuant to its terms anywhere in the state.
2. A search warrant issued by a city court, a town court or a village
court may be executed pursuant to its terms only in the county of
issuance or an adjoining county.
Search warrants; to whom addressable and by whom executable.
1. A search warrant must be addressed to a police officer whose
geographical area of employment embraces or is embraced or partially
embraced by the county of issuance. The warrant need not be addressed
to a specific police officer but may be addressed to any police officer
of a designated classification, or to any police officer of any
classification employed or having general jurisdiction to act as a
police officer in the county.
2. A police officer to whom a search warrant is addressed, as provided
in subdivision one, may execute it pursuant to its terms anywhere in the
county of issuance or an adjoining county, and he may execute it
pursuant to its terms in any other county of the state in which it is
executable if (a) his geographical area of employment embraces the
entire county of issuance or (b) he is a member of the police department
or force of a city located in such county of issuance.
Search warrants; when executable.
1. A search warrant must be executed not more than ten days after the
date of issuance and it must thereafter be returned to the court without
unnecessary delay.
2. A search warrant may be executed on any day of the week. It may
be executed only between the hours of 6:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M., unless
the warrant expressly authorizes execution thereof at any time of the
day or night, as provided in subdivision five of section 690.45.
Search warrants; the application.
1. An application for a search warrant may be in writing or oral. If
in writing, it must be made, subscribed and sworn to by a public servant
specified in subdivision one of section 690.05. If oral, it must be made
by such a public servant and sworn to and recorded in the manner
provided in section 690.36.
2. The application shall be made to:
(a) A local criminal court, as defined in section 10.10 of this
chapter, having preliminary jurisdiction over the underlying offense, or
geographical jurisdiction over the location to be searched when the
search is to be made for personal property of a kind or character
described in section 690.10 of this article except that:
(i) if a town court has such jurisdiction but is not available to
issue the search warrant, the warrant may be issued by the local
criminal court of any village within such town or, any adjoining town,
village embraced in whole or in part by such adjoining town, or city of
the same county;
(ii) if a village court has such jurisdiction but is not available to
issue the search warrant, the warrant may be issued by the town court of
the town embracing such village or any other village court within such
town, or, if such town or village court is not available either, before
the local criminal court of any adjoining town, village embraced in
whole or in part by such adjoining town, or city of the same county; and
(iii) if a city court has such jurisdiction but is not available to
issue the search warrant, the warrant may be issued by the local
criminal court of any adjoining town or village, or village court
embraced by an adjoining town, within the same county as such city.
(b) A local criminal court, as defined in section 10.10 of this
chapter, with geographical jurisdiction over the location where the
premises to be searched is located, or which issued the underlying
arrest warrant, when the search warrant is sought pursuant to paragraph
(b) of subdivision two of section 690.05 of this article, for the
purpose of arresting a wanted person.
Any search warrant issued pursuant to this section shall be subject to
the territorial limitations provided by section 690.20 of this article.
3. The application must contain:
(a) The name of the court and the name and title of the applicant; and
(b) A statement that there is reasonable cause to believe that
property of a kind or character described in section 690.10 may be found
in or upon a designated or described place, vehicle or person, or, in
the case of an application for a search warrant as defined in paragraph
(b) of subdivision two of section 690.05, a statement that there is
reasonable cause to believe that the person who is the subject of the
warrant of arrest may be found in the designated premises; and
(c) Allegations of fact supporting such statement. Such allegations of
fact may be based upon personal knowledge of the applicant or upon
information and belief, provided that in the latter event the sources of
such information and the grounds of such belief are stated. The
applicant may also submit depositions of other persons containing
allegations of fact supporting or tending to support those contained in
the application; and
(d) A request that the court issue a search warrant directing a search
for and seizure of the property or person in question; and
(e) In the case of an application for a search warrant as defined in
paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section 690.05, a copy of the
warrant of arrest and the underlying accusatory instrument.
4. The application may also contain:
(a) A request that the search warrant be made executable at any time
of the day or night, upon the ground that there is reasonable cause to
believe that (i) it cannot be executed between the hours of 6:00 A.M.
and 9:00 P.M., or (ii) the property sought will be removed or destroyed
if not seized forthwith, or (iii) in the case of an application for a
search warrant as defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section
690.05, the person sought is likely to flee or commit another crime, or
may endanger the safety of the executing police officers or another
person if not seized forthwith or between the hours of 9:00 P.M. and
6:00 A.M.; and
(b) A request that the search warrant authorize the executing police
officer to enter premises to be searched without giving notice of his
authority and purpose, upon the ground that there is reasonable cause to
believe that (i) the property sought may be easily and quickly destroyed
or disposed of, or (ii) the giving of such notice may endanger the life
or safety of the executing officer or another person, or (iii) in the
case of an application for a search warrant as defined in paragraph (b)
of subdivision two of section 690.05 for the purpose of searching for
and arresting a person who is the subject of a warrant for a felony, the
person sought is likely to commit another felony, or may endanger the
life or safety of the executing officer or another person.
Any request made pursuant to this subdivision must be accompanied and
supported by allegations of fact of a kind prescribed in paragraph (c)
of subdivision two.
Search warrants; special provisions governing oral applications
therefor.
1. An oral application for a search warrant may be communicated to a
judge by telephone, radio or other means of electronic communication.
2. Where an oral application for a search warrant is made, the
applicant therefor must identify himself and the purpose of his
communication. After being sworn as provided in subdivision three of
this section, the applicant must also make the statement required by
paragraph (b) of subdivision two of section 690.35 and provide the same
allegations of fact required by paragraph (c) of such subdivision;
provided, however, persons, properly identified, other than the
applicant may also provide some or all of such allegations of fact
directly to the court. Where appropriate, the applicant may also make a
request specified in subdivision three of section 690.35.
3. Upon being advised that an oral application for a search warrant is
being made, a judge shall place under oath the applicant and any other
person providing information in support of the application. Such oath
or oaths and all of the remaining communication must be recorded, either
by means of a voice recording device or verbatim stenographic or
verbatim longhand notes. If a voice recording device is used or a
stenographic record made, the judge must have the record transcribed,
certify to the accuracy of the transcription and file the original
record and transcription with the court within twenty-four hours of the
issuance of a warrant. If longhand notes are taken, the judge shall
subscribe a copy and file it with the court within twenty-four hours of
the issuance of a warrant.
Search warrants; form and content.
A search warrant must contain:
1. The name of the issuing court and, except where the search warrant
has been obtained on an oral application, the subscription of the
issuing judge; and
2. Where the search warrant has been obtained on an oral application,
it shall so indicate and shall state the name of the issuing judge and
the time and date on which such judge directed its issuance.
3. The name, department or classification of the police officer to
whom it is addressed; and
4. A description of the property which is the subject of the search,
or, in the case of a search warrant as defined in paragraph (b) of
subdivision two of section 690.05, a description of the person to be
searched for; and
5. A designation or description of the place, premises or person to
be searched, by means of address, ownership, name or any other means
essential to identification with certainty; and
6. A direction that the warrant be executed between the hours of 6:00
A.M. and 9:00 P.M., or, where the court has specially so determined, an
authorization for execution thereof at any time of the day or night; and
7. An authorization, where the court has specially so determined,
that the executing police officer enter the premises to be searched
without giving notice of his authority and purpose; and
8. A direction that the warrant and any property seized pursuant
thereto be returned and delivered to the court without unnecessary
delay; and
9. In the case of a search warrant as defined in paragraph (b) of
subdivision two of section 690.05, a copy of the warrant of arrest and
the underlying accusatory instrument.
Search warrants; execution thereof.
1. In executing a search warrant directing a search of premises or a
vehicle, a police officer must, except as provided in subdivision two,
give, or make reasonable effort to give, notice of his authority and
purpose to an occupant thereof before entry and show him the warrant or
a copy thereof upon request. If he is not thereafter admitted, he may
forcibly enter such premises or vehicle and may use against any person
resisting his entry or search thereof as much physical force, other than
deadly physical force, as is necessary to execute the warrant; and he
may use deadly physical force if he reasonably believes such to be
necessary to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably
believes to be the use or imminent use of deadly physical force.
2. In executing a search warrant directing a search of premises or a
vehicle, a police officer need not give notice to anyone of his
authority and purpose, as prescribed in subdivision one, but may
promptly enter the same if:
(a) Such premises or vehicle are at the time unoccupied or reasonably
believed by the officer to be unoccupied; or
(b) The search warrant expressly authorizes entry without notice.
3. In executing a search warrant directing or authorizing a search of
a person, a police officer must give, or make reasonable effort to give,
such person notice of his authority and purpose and show him the warrant
or a copy thereof upon request. If such person, or another, thereafter
resists or refuses to permit the search, the officer may use as much
physical force, other than deadly physical force, as is necessary to
execute the warrant; and he may use deadly physical force if he
reasonably believes such to be necessary to defend himself or a third
person from what he reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of
deadly physical force.
4. Upon seizing property pursuant to a search warrant, a police
officer must write and subscribe a receipt itemizing the property taken
and containing the name of the court by which the warrant was issued. If
property is taken from a person, such receipt must be given to such
person. If property is taken from premises or a vehicle, such receipt
must be given to the owner, tenant or other person in possession thereof
if he is present; or if he is not, the officer must leave such a receipt
in the premises or vehicle from which the property was taken.
5. Upon seizing property pursuant to a search warrant, a police
officer must without unnecessary delay return to the court the warrant
and the property, and must file therewith a written inventory of such
property, subscribed and sworn to by such officer.
6. Upon arresting a person during a search for him or her pursuant to
a search warrant as defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision two of
section 690.05, a police officer shall comply with the terms of the
warrant of arrest, superior court warrant of arrest, or bench warrant
for a felony, and shall proceed in the manner directed by this chapter.
Upon arresting such person, the police officer shall also, without
unnecessary delay, file a written statement with the court which issued
the search warrant, subscribed and sworn to by such officer, setting
forth that the person has been arrested and duly brought before the
appropriate court, return to the court the warrant and the property
seized in the course of its execution, and file therewith a written
inventory of any such property, subscribed and sworn to by such officer.
Search warrants; disposition of seized property.
1. Upon receiving property seized pursuant to a search warrant, the
court must either:
(a) Retain it in the custody of the court pending further disposition
thereof pursuant to subdivision two or some other provision of law; or
(b) Direct that it be held in the custody of the person who applied
for the warrant, or of the police officer who executed it, or of the
governmental or official agency or department by which either such
public servant is employed, upon condition that upon order of such court
such property be returned thereto or delivered to another court.
2. A local criminal court which retains custody of such property
must, upon request of another criminal court in which a criminal action
involving or relating to such property is pending, cause it to be
delivered thereto.
ARTICLE 700 Eavesdropping and Video Surveillance Warrants
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; definitions of
terms.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following
meanings:
1. "Eavesdropping" means "wiretapping", "mechanical overhearing of
conversation," or the "intercepting or accessing of an electronic
communication", as those terms are defined in section 250.00 of the
penal law, but does not include the use of a pen register or trap and
trace device when authorized pursuant to article 705 of this chapter.
2. "Eavesdropping warrant" means an order of a justice authorizing or
approving eavesdropping.
3. "Intercepted communication" means (a) a telephonic or telegraphic
communication which was intentionally overheard or recorded by a person
other than the sender or receiver thereof, without the consent of the
sender or receiver, by means of any instrument, device or equipment, or
(b) a conversation or discussion which was intentionally overheard or
recorded, without the consent of at least one party thereto, by a person
not present thereat, by means of any instrument, device or equipment; or
(c) an electronic communication which was intentionally intercepted or
accessed, as that term is defined in section 250.00 of the penal law.
The term "contents," when used with respect to a communication, includes
any information concerning the identity of the parties to such
communications, and the existence, substance, purport, or meaning of
that communication. The term "communication" includes conversation and
discussion.
3-a. "Telephonic communication", "electronic communication", and
"intentionally intercepted or accessed" have the meanings given to those
terms by subdivisions three, five, and six respectively, of section
250.00 of the penal law.
4. "Justice," except as otherwise provided herein, means any justice
of an appellate division of the judicial department in which the
eavesdropping warrant is to be executed, or any justice of the supreme
court of the judicial district in which the eavesdropping warrant is to
be executed, or any county court judge of the county in which the
eavesdropping warrant is to be executed. When the eavesdropping warrant
is to authorize the interception of oral communications occurring in a
vehicle or wire communications occurring over a telephone located in a
vehicle, "justice" means any justice of the supreme court of the
judicial department or any county court judge of the county in which the
eavesdropping device is to be installed or connected or of any judicial
department or county in which communications are expected to be
intercepted. When such a justice issues such an eavesdropping warrant,
such warrant may be executed and such oral or wire communications may be
intercepted anywhere in the state.
5. "Applicant" means a district attorney or the attorney general or if
authorized by the attorney general, the deputy attorney general in
charge of the organized crime task force. If a district attorney or the
attorney general is actually absent or disabled, the term "applicant"
includes that person designated to act for him and perform his official
function in and during his actual absence or disability.
6. "Law enforcement officer" means any public servant who is empowered
by law to conduct an investigation of or to make an arrest for a
designated offense, and any attorney authorized by law to prosecute or
participate in the prosecution of a designated offense.
7. "Exigent circumstances" means conditions requiring the preservation
of secrecy, and whereby there is a reasonable likelihood that a
continuing investigation would be thwarted by alerting any of the
persons subject to surveillance to the fact that such surveillance had
occurred.
8. "Designated offense" means any one or more of the following crimes:
(a) A conspiracy to commit any offense enumerated in the following
paragraphs of this subdivision, or an attempt to commit any felony
enumerated in the following paragraphs of this subdivision which attempt
would itself constitute a felony;
(b) Any of the following felonies: assault in the second degree as
defined in section 120.05 of the penal law, assault in the first degree
as defined in section 120.10 of the penal law, reckless endangerment in
the first degree as defined in section 120.25 of the penal law,
promoting a suicide attempt as defined in section 120.30 of the penal
law, strangulation in the second degree as defined in section 121.12 of
the penal law, strangulation in the first degree as defined in section
121.13 of the penal law, criminally negligent homicide as defined in
section 125.10 of the penal law, manslaughter in the second degree as
defined in section 125.15 of the penal law, manslaughter in the first
degree as defined in section 125.20 of the penal law, murder in the
second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law, murder in
the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal law, rape in
the third degree as defined in section 130.25 of the penal law, rape in
the second degree as defined in section 130.30 of the penal law, rape in
the first degree as defined in section 130.35 of the penal law, a crime
formerly defined in section 130.40 of the penal law, a crime formerly
defined in section 130.45 of the penal law, a crime formerly defined in
section 130.50 of the penal law, sexual abuse in the first degree as
defined in section 130.65 of the penal law, unlawful imprisonment in the
first degree as defined in section 135.10 of the penal law, kidnapping
in the second degree as defined in section 135.20 of the penal law,
kidnapping in the first degree as defined in section 135.25 of the penal
law, labor trafficking as defined in section 135.35 of the penal law,
aggravated labor trafficking as defined in section 135.37 of the penal
law, custodial interference in the first degree as defined in section
135.50 of the penal law, coercion in the first degree as defined in
section 135.65 of the penal law, criminal trespass in the first degree
as defined in section 140.17 of the penal law, burglary in the third
degree as defined in section 140.20 of the penal law, burglary in the
second degree as defined in section 140.25 of the penal law, burglary in
the first degree as defined in section 140.30 of the penal law, criminal
mischief in the third degree as defined in section 145.05 of the penal
law, criminal mischief in the second degree as defined in section 145.10
of the penal law, criminal mischief in the first degree as defined in
section 145.12 of the penal law, criminal tampering in the first degree
as defined in section 145.20 of the penal law, arson in the fourth
degree as defined in section 150.05 of the penal law, arson in the third
degree as defined in section 150.10 of the penal law, arson in the
second degree as defined in section 150.15 of the penal law, arson in
the first degree as defined in section 150.20 of the penal law, grand
larceny in the fourth degree as defined in section 155.30 of the penal
law, grand larceny in the third degree as defined in section 155.35 of
the penal law, grand larceny in the second degree as defined in section
155.40 of the penal law, grand larceny in the first degree as defined in
section 155.42 of the penal law, health care fraud in the fourth degree
as defined in section 177.10 of the penal law, health care fraud in the
third degree as defined in section 177.15 of the penal law, health care
fraud in the second degree as defined in section 177.20 of the penal
law, health care fraud in the first degree as defined in section 177.25
of the penal law, robbery in the third degree as defined in section
160.05 of the penal law, robbery in the second degree as defined in
section 160.10 of the penal law, robbery in the first degree as defined
in section 160.15 of the penal law, unlawful use of secret scientific
material as defined in section 165.07 of the penal law, criminal
possession of stolen property in the fourth degree as defined in section
165.45 of the penal law, criminal possession of stolen property in the
third degree as defined in section 165.50 of the penal law, criminal
possession of stolen property in the second degree as defined by section
165.52 of the penal law, criminal possession of stolen property in the
first degree as defined by section 165.54 of the penal law, trademark
counterfeiting in the second degree as defined in section 165.72 of the
penal law, trademark counterfeiting in the first degree as defined in
section 165.73 of the penal law, forgery in the second degree as defined
in section 170.10 of the penal law, forgery in the first degree as
defined in section 170.15 of the penal law, criminal possession of a
forged instrument in the second degree as defined in section 170.25 of
the penal law, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first
degree as defined in section 170.30 of the penal law, criminal
possession of forgery devices as defined in section 170.40 of the penal
law, falsifying business records in the first degree as defined in
section 175.10 of the penal law, tampering with public records in the
first degree as defined in section 175.25 of the penal law, offering a
false instrument for filing in the first degree as defined in section
175.35 of the penal law, issuing a false certificate as defined in
section 175.40 of the penal law, criminal diversion of prescription
medications and prescriptions in the second degree as defined in section
178.20 of the penal law, criminal diversion of prescription medications
and prescriptions in the first degree as defined in section 178.25 of
the penal law, residential mortgage fraud in the fourth degree as
defined in section 187.10 of the penal law, residential mortgage fraud
in the third degree as defined in section 187.15 of the penal law,
residential mortgage fraud in the second degree as defined in section
187.20 of the penal law, residential mortgage fraud in the first degree
as defined in section 187.25 of the penal law, escape in the second
degree as defined in section 205.10 of the penal law, escape in the
first degree as defined in section 205.15 of the penal law, absconding
from temporary release in the first degree as defined in section 205.17
of the penal law, promoting prison contraband in the first degree as
defined in section 205.25 of the penal law, hindering prosecution in the
second degree as defined in section 205.60 of the penal law, hindering
prosecution in the first degree as defined in section 205.65 of the
penal law, sex trafficking as defined in section 230.34 of the penal
law, sex trafficking of a child as defined in section 230.34-a of the
penal law, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as
defined in subdivisions two, three and five of section 265.02 of the
penal law, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree as
defined in section 265.03 of the penal law, criminal possession of a
weapon in the first degree as defined in section 265.04 of the penal
law, manufacture, transport, disposition and defacement of weapons and
dangerous instruments and appliances defined as felonies in subdivisions
one, two, and three of section 265.10 of the penal law, sections 265.11,
265.12 and 265.13 of the penal law, or prohibited use of weapons as
defined in subdivision two of section 265.35 of the penal law, relating
to firearms and other dangerous weapons, criminal manufacture, sale or
transport of an undetectable firearm, rifle or shotgun as defined in
section 265.50 of the penal law, or failure to disclose the origin of a
recording in the first degree as defined in section 275.40 of the penal
law;
(c) Criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh
degree as defined in section 220.03 of the penal law, criminal
possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree as defined in
section 220.06 of the penal law, criminal possession of a controlled
substance in the fourth degree as defined in section 220.09 of the penal
law, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree
as defined in section 220.16 of the penal law, criminal possession of a
controlled substance in the second degree as defined in section 220.18
of the penal law, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the
first degree as defined in section 220.21 of the penal law, criminal
sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree as defined in section
220.31 of the penal law, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the
fourth degree as defined in section 220.34 of the penal law, criminal
sale of a controlled substance in the third degree as defined in section
220.39 of the penal law, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the
second degree as defined in section 220.41 of the penal law, criminal
sale of a controlled substance in the first degree as defined in section
220.43 of the penal law, criminally possessing a hypodermic instrument
as defined in section 220.45 of the penal law, criminal sale of a
prescription for a controlled substance or a controlled substance by a
practitioner or pharmacist as defined in section 220.65 of the penal
law, criminal possession of methamphetamine manufacturing material in
the second degree as defined in section 220.70 of the penal law,
criminal possession of methamphetamine manufacturing material in the
first degree as defined in section 220.71 of the penal law, criminal
possession of precursors of methamphetamine as defined in section 220.72
of the penal law, unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine in the third
degree as defined in section 220.73 of the penal law, unlawful
manufacture of methamphetamine in the second degree as defined in
section 220.74 of the penal law, unlawful manufacture of methamphetamine
in the first degree as defined in section 220.75 of the penal law,
unlawful disposal of methamphetamine laboratory material as defined in
section 220.76 of the penal law, operating as a major trafficker as
defined in section 220.77 of the penal law, promoting gambling in the
second degree as defined in section 225.05 of the penal law, promoting
gambling in the first degree as defined in section 225.10 of the penal
law, possession of gambling records in the second degree as defined in
section 225.15 of the penal law, possession of gambling records in the
first degree as defined in section 225.20 of the penal law, and
possession of a gambling device as defined in section 225.30 of the
penal law;
(d) Commercial bribing, commercial bribe receiving, bribing a labor
official, bribe receiving by a labor official, sports bribing and sports
bribe receiving, as defined in article one hundred eighty of the penal
law;
(e) Criminal usury, as defined in article one hundred ninety of the
penal law;
(f) Bribery in the third degree, bribery in the second degree, bribery
in the first degree, bribe receiving in the third degree, bribe
receiving in the second degree, bribe receiving in the first degree,
bribe giving for public office, bribe receiving for public office and
corrupt use of position or authority, as defined in article two hundred
of the penal law;
(g) Bribing a witness, bribe receiving by a witness, bribing a juror
and bribe receiving by a juror, as defined in article two hundred
fifteen of the penal law;
(h) Promoting prostitution in the first degree, as defined in section
230.32 of the penal law, promoting prostitution in the second degree, as
defined by subdivision one of section 230.30 of the penal law, promoting
prostitution in the third degree, as defined in section 230.25 of the
penal law;
(i) Riot in the first degree and criminal anarchy, as defined in
article two hundred forty of the penal law;
(j) Eavesdropping, as defined in article two hundred fifty of the
penal law;
(k) Any of the acts designated as felonies in subdivisions two and
four of section four hundred eighty-one of the tax law, which section
relates to penalties under the tax on cigarettes imposed by article
twenty of such law, and any of the acts designated as felonies in
subdivision c of section 11-1317 of the administrative code of the city
of New York, which section relates to penalties under the cigarette tax
imposed by chapter thirteen of title eleven of such code.
(l) Scheme to defraud in the first degree as defined in article one
hundred ninety of the penal law.
(m) Any of the acts designated as felonies in section three hundred
fifty-two-c of the general business law.
(n) Any of the acts designated as felonies in title twenty-seven of
article seventy-one of the environmental conservation law.
(o) Money laundering in the first degree, as defined in section 470.20
of the penal law, money laundering in the second degree as defined in
section 470.15 of the penal law, money laundering in the third degree as
defined in section 470.10 of such law, and money laundering in the
fourth degree as defined in section 470.05 of such law, where the
property involved represents or is represented to be the proceeds of
specified criminal conduct which itself constitutes a designated offense
within the meaning of this subdivision.
(p) Stalking in the second degree as defined in section 120.55 of the
penal law, and stalking in the first degree as defined in section 120.60
of the penal law.
(q) Soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism in the
second degree as defined in section 490.10 of the penal law, soliciting
or providing support for an act of terrorism in the first degree as
defined in section 490.15 of the penal law, making a terroristic threat
as defined in section 490.20 of the penal law, crime of terrorism as
defined in section 490.25 of the penal law, domestic act of terrorism
motivated by hate in the second degree as defined in section 490.27 of
the penal law, domestic act of terrorism motivated by hate in the first
degree as defined in section 490.28 of the penal law, hindering
prosecution of terrorism in the second degree as defined in section
490.30 of the penal law, hindering prosecution of terrorism in the first
degree as defined in section 490.35 of the penal law, criminal
possession of a chemical weapon or biological weapon in the third degree
as defined in section 490.37 of the penal law, criminal possession of a
chemical weapon or biological weapon in the second degree as defined in
section 490.40 of the penal law, criminal possession of a chemical
weapon or biological weapon in the first degree as defined in section
490.45 of the penal law, criminal use of a chemical weapon or biological
weapon in the third degree as defined in section 490.47 of the penal
law, criminal use of a chemical weapon or biological weapon in the
second degree as defined in section 490.50 of the penal law, and
criminal use of a chemical weapon or biological weapon in the first
degree as defined in section 490.55 of the penal law.
(r) Falsely reporting an incident in the second degree as defined in
section 240.55 of the penal law, falsely reporting an incident in the
first degree as defined in section 240.60 of the penal law, placing a
false bomb in the second degree as defined in section 240.61 of the
penal law, placing a false bomb in the first degree as defined in
section 240.62 of the penal law, and placing a false bomb in a sports
stadium or arena, mass transportation facility or enclosed shopping mall
as defined in section 240.63 of the penal law.
(s) Identity theft in the second degree, as defined in section 190.79
of the penal law, identity theft in the first degree, as defined in
section 190.80 of the penal law, unlawful possession of personal
identification information in the second degree, as defined in section
190.82 of the penal law, and unlawful possession of personal
identification information in the first degree, as defined in section
190.83 of the penal law.
(t) Menacing a police officer or peace officer as defined in section
120.18 of the penal law; aggravated criminally negligent homicide as
defined in section 125.11 of the penal law; aggravated manslaughter in
the second degree as defined in section 125.21 of the penal law;
aggravated manslaughter in the first degree as defined in section 125.22
of the penal law; aggravated murder as defined in section 125.26 of the
penal law.
(u) Any felony defined in article four hundred ninety-six of the penal
law.
(v) Any of the acts designated as felonies in section three hundred
fifty-one of the agriculture and markets law.
9. "Video surveillance" means the intentional visual observation by
law enforcement of a person by means of a television camera or other
electronic device that is part of a television transmitting apparatus,
whether or not such observation is recorded on film or video tape,
without the consent of that person or another person thereat and under
circumstances in which such observation in the absence of a video
surveillance warrant infringes upon such person's reasonable expectation
of privacy under the constitution of this state or of the United States.
10. "Video surveillance warrant" means an order of a justice
authorizing or approving video surveillance.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; in general.
1. Under circumstances prescribed in this article, a justice may
issue an eavesdropping warrant or a video surveillance warrant upon ex
parte application of an applicant who is authorized by law to
investigate, prosecute or participate in the prosecution of the
particular designated offense which is the subject of the application.
2. No eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant may authorize or
approve the interception of any communication or the conducting of any
video surveillance for any period longer than is necessary to achieve
the objective of the authorization, or in any event longer than thirty
days. Such thirty day period shall begin on the date designated in the
warrant as the effective date, which date may be no later than ten days
after the warrant is issued.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; application.
1. An ex parte application for an eavesdropping or video surveillance
warrant must be made to a justice in writing, except as provided in
section 700.21 of this article, and must be subscribed and sworn to by
an applicant.
2. The application must contain:
(a) The identity of the applicant and a statement of the applicant's
authority to make such application; and
(b) A full and complete statement of the facts and circumstances
relied upon by the applicant, to justify his belief that an
eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant should be issued, including
(i) a statement of facts establishing probable cause to believe that a
particular designated offense has been, is being, or is about to be
committed, (ii) a particular description of the nature and location of
the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be
intercepted or the video surveillance is to be conducted, (iii) a
particular description of the type of the communications sought to be
intercepted or of the observations sought to be made, and (iv) the
identity of the person, if known, committing such designated offense and
whose communications are to be intercepted or who is to be the subject
of the video surveillance; and
(c) A statement that such communications or observations are not
otherwise legally privileged; and
(d) A full and complete statement of facts establishing that normal
investigative procedures have been tried and have failed or reasonably
appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous to
employ, to obtain the evidence sought; and
(e) A statement of the period of time for which the eavesdropping or
video surveillance is required to be maintained. If the nature of the
investigation is such that the authorization for eavesdropping or video
surveillance should not automatically terminate when the described type
of communication has been first obtained or when the described type of
observation has been first made, a particular description of facts
establishing probable cause to believe that additional communications or
observations of the same type will occur thereafter; and
(f) A full and complete statement of the facts concerning all
previous applications, known to the applicant, for an eavesdropping or
video surveillance warrant involving any of the same persons, facilities
or places specified in the application, and the action taken by the
justice on each such application.
3. Allegations of fact in the application may be based either upon
the personal knowledge of the applicant or upon information and belief.
If the applicant personally knows the facts alleged, it must be so
stated. If the facts stated in the application are derived in whole or
part from the statements of persons other than the applicant, the
sources of such facts must be either disclosed or described, and the
application must contain facts establishing the existence and
reliability of the informants or the reliability of the information
supplied by them. The application must also state, so far as possible,
the basis of the informant's knowledge or belief. Affidavits of persons
other than the applicant may be submitted in conjunction with the
application if they tend to support any fact or conclusion alleged
therein. Such accompanying affidavits may be based either on personal
knowledge of the affiant, or information and belief with the source
thereof and the reason therefor specified.
Temporary authorization for eavesdropping or video surveillance
in emergency situations.
1. In an emergency situation where imminent danger of death or serious
physical injury exists and, under the circumstances, it is impractical
for the applicant to prepare a written application without risk of such
death or injury occurring, an application for an eavesdropping or video
surveillance warrant need not be in writing but may be communicated to a
justice by telephone, radio or other means of electronic communication.
2. Where an oral application for an eavesdropping or video
surveillance warrant is made, the applicant therefor must identify
himself and the purpose of his communication or observation, after being
sworn as provided in subdivision three of this section. The application
must meet the requirements of section 700.20 of this article and provide
the same allegations of fact required by that section.
3. Upon being advised that an oral application for an eavesdropping or
video surveillance warrant is being made, a justice shall place under
oath the applicant and any other person providing information in support
of the application. Such oath or oaths and all of the remaining
communication must be recorded, either by means of a voice recording
device or verbatim stenographic or verbatim longhand notes. If a voice
recording device is used or a stenographic record made, the justice must
have the record transcribed, certify to the accuracy of the
transcription and file the original record and transcription with the
court within twenty-four hours of the issuance of a warrant. If longhand
notes are taken, the justice shall subscribe a copy and file it with the
court within twenty-four hours of the issuance of a warrant.
4. Upon oral application, the court may, where it finds that an
emergency situation exists and that the requirements of section 700.15
of this article have been satisfied, issue a temporary eavesdropping or
video surveillance warrant authorizing eavesdropping or video
surveillance for a period not to exceed twenty-four hours. Such
eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant shall be executed in the
manner prescribed by this article. The twenty-four hour period may not
be extended nor may a temporary warrant be renewed except by written
application in conformity with the requirements of this article.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; form and
content.
An eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant must contain:
1. The name of the applicant, date of issuance, and the subscription
and title of the issuing justice; and
2. The identity of the person, if known, whose communications are to
be intercepted or who is to be the subject of video surveillance; and
3. The nature and location of the communications facilities as to
which, or the place where, authority to intercept or conduct video
surveillance is granted; and
4. A particular description of the type of communications sought to
be intercepted or of the type of observations to be made, and a
statement of the particular designated offense to which it relates; and
5. The identity of the law enforcement agency authorized to intercept
the communications or conduct the video surveillance; and
6. The period of time during which such interception or observation
is authorized, including a statement as to whether or not the
interception or video surveillance shall automatically terminate when
the described communication has been first obtained or the described
observation has been first made; and
7. A provision that the authorization to intercept or conduct video
surveillance shall be executed as soon as practicable, shall be
conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of
communications or the making of observations not otherwise subject to
eavesdropping or video surveillance under this article, and must
terminate upon attainment of the authorized objective, or in any event
in thirty days; and
8. An express authorization to make secret entry upon a private place
or premises to install an eavesdropping or video surveillance device, if
such entry is necessary to execute the warrant; and
9. An order authorizing eavesdropping or video surveillance may direct
that providers of wire or electronic communication services furnish the
applicant information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to
accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of
interference with the services that the service provider accords the
party whose communications are to be intercepted. The order shall not
direct the service providers to perform the intercept or use the
premises of the service provider for such activity.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; manner and time
of execution.
1. An eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant must be executed
according to its terms by a law enforcement officer who is a member of
the law enforcement agency authorized in the warrant to intercept the
communications or conduct the video surveillance.
2. Upon termination of the authorization in the warrant,
eavesdropping or video surveillance must cease and as soon as
practicable thereafter any device installed for such purpose either must
be removed or must be permanently inactivated as soon as practicable by
any means approved by the issuing justice. Entry upon a private place
or premise for the removal or permanent inactivation of such device is
deemed to be authorized by the warrant.
3. The contents of any communication intercepted or of any
observation made by any means authorized by this article must, if
possible, be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device. The
recording of the contents of any such communication or observation must
be done in such way as will protect the recording from editing or other
alterations.
4. In the event an intercepted communication is in a code or foreign
language, and the services of an expert in that foreign language or
code cannot reasonably be obtained during the interception period, where
the warrant so authorizes and in a manner specified therein, the
minimization required by subdivision seven of section 700.30 of this
article may be accomplished as soon as practicable after such
interception.
5. A good faith reliance by a provider of a wire or electronic
communication service upon the validity of a court order issued pursuant
to this article is a complete defense against any civil cause of action
or criminal action based solely on a failure to comply with this
article.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; progress
reports and notice.
1. An eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant may require reports
to be made to the issuing justice showing what progress has been made
toward achievement of the authorized objective and the need for
continued eavesdropping or video surveillance. Such reports shall be
made at such intervals as the justice may require.
2. Immediately upon the expiration of the period of an eavesdropping
or video surveillance warrant, the recordings of communications or
observations made pursuant to subdivision three of section 700.35 must
be made available to the issuing justice and sealed under his
directions.
3. Within a reasonable time, but in no case later than ninety days
after termination of an eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant, or
expiration of an extension order, except as otherwise provided in
subdivision four, written notice of the fact and date of the issuance of
the eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant, and of the period of
authorized eavesdropping or video surveillance, and of the fact that
during such period communications were or were not intercepted or
observation were or were not made, must be served upon the person named
in the warrant and such other parties to the intercepted communications
or subjects of the video surveillance as the justice may determine in
his discretion is in the interest of justice. Service reasonably
calculated to give affected parties the notice required by this
subdivision shall be effected within the time limits provided for herein
and in a manner prescribed by the justice. The justice, upon the filing
of a motion by any person served with such notice, may in his discretion
make available to such person or his counsel for inspection such
portions of the intercepted communications or video surveillance,
applications and warrants as the justice determines to be in the
interest of justice.
4. On a showing of exigent circumstances to the issuing justice, the
service of the notice required by subdivision three may be postponed by
order of the justice for a reasonable period of time. Renewals of an
order of postponement may be obtained on a new showing of exigent
circumstances.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; custody of
warrants, applications and recordings.
1. Applications made and warrants issued under this article shall be
sealed by the justice. Any eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant,
together with a copy of papers upon which the application is based,
shall be delivered to and retained by the applicant as authority for the
eavesdropping or video surveillance authorized therein. A copy of such
eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant, together with all the
original papers upon which the application was based, must be retained
by the justice issuing the same, and, in the event of the denial of an
application for such an eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant, a
copy of the papers upon which the application was based must be retained
by the justice denying the same. Such applications and warrants may be
disclosed only upon a showing of good cause before a court and may not
be destroyed except on order of the issuing or denying justice, and in
any event must be kept for ten years.
2. Custody of the recordings made pursuant to subdivision three of
section 700.35 may be wherever the justice orders. They may not be
destroyed except upon an order of the justice who issued the warrant and
in any event must be kept for ten years. Duplicate recordings may be
made for use or disclosure pursuant to the provisions of subdivisions
one and two of section 700.65 for investigations.
Eavesdropping warrants; reports to the administrative office of
the United States courts.
1. Within thirty days after the termination of an eavesdropping
warrant or the expiration of an extension order, the issuing or denying
justice must submit such report to the administrative office of the
United States courts as is required by federal law.
2. In January of each year, the attorney general and each district
attorney must submit such report to the administrative office of the
United States courts as is required by federal law.
Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; disclosure and
use of information; order of amendment.
1. Any law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by this
article, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any intercepted
communication or video surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom, may
disclose such contents to another law enforcement officer to the extent
that such disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of the
official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure.
2. Any law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by this
article, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any intercepted
communication or video surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom, may
use such contents to the extent such use is appropriate to the proper
performance of his official duties.
3. Any person who has received, by any means authorized by this
article, any information concerning a communication or video
surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom, intercepted or conducted in
accordance with the provisions of this article, may disclose the
contents of that communication or video surveillance, or such derivative
evidence, while giving testimony under oath in any criminal proceeding
in any court, in any grand jury proceeding or in any action commenced
pursuant to article thirteen-A or thirteen-B of the civil practice law
and rules; provided, however, that the presence of the seal provided for
by subdivision two of section 700.50, or a satisfactory explanation of
the absence thereof, shall be a prerequisite for the use or disclosure
of the contents of any communication or video surveillance, or evidence
derived therefrom; and provided further, however, that where a criminal
court of competent jurisdiction has ordered exclusion or suppression of
the contents of an intercepted communication or video surveillance, or
evidence derived therefrom, such determination shall be binding in an
action commenced pursuant to article thirteen-A or thirteen-B of the
civil practice law and rules.
4. When a law enforcement officer, while engaged in intercepting
communications or conducting video surveillance in the manner authorized
by this article, intercepts a communication or makes an observation
which was not otherwise sought and which constitutes evidence of any
crime that has been, is being or is about to be committed, the contents
of such communications or observation, and evidence derived therefrom,
may be disclosed or used as provided in subdivisions one and two. Such
contents and any evidence derived therefrom may be used under
subdivision three when a justice amends the eavesdropping or video
surveillance warrant to include such contents. The application for such
amendment must be made by the applicant as soon as practicable by giving
notice to the court of the interception of the communication or the
making of the observation and of the contents of such interception or
observation; provided that during the period in which the eavesdropping
or video surveillance is continuing, such notice must be given within
ten days after probable cause exists to believe that a crime not named
in the warrant has been, is being, or is about to be committed, or at
the time an application for an order of extension is made pursuant to
section 700.40 of this article, if such probable cause then exists,
whichever is earlier. If the justice finds that such contents were
otherwise intercepted in accordance with the provisions of this article,
he may grant the application.
Eavesdropping warrants; notice before use of evidence.
The contents of any intercepted communication, or evidence derived
therefrom, may not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed upon a
trial of a defendant unless the people, within fifteen days after
arraignment and before the commencement of the trial, furnish the
defendant with a copy of the eavesdropping warrant, and accompanying
application, under which interception was authorized or approved. This
fifteen day period may be extended by the trial court upon good cause
shown if it finds that the defendant will not be prejudiced by the
delay in receiving such papers.
ARTICLE 705 Pen Registers and Trap and Trace Devices
Definitions.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following
meanings:
1. "Pen register" means a device which records or decodes electronic
or other impulses which identify the numbers dialed or otherwise
transmitted on the telephone line to which such device is attached, but
such term does not include any device used by a provider or customer of
a wire or electronic communication service for billing, or recording as
an incident to billing, for communications services provided by such
provider or any device used by a provider or customer of a wire
communication service for cost accounting or other like purposes in the
ordinary course of its business.
2. "Trap and trace device" means a device which captures the incoming
electronic or other impulses which identify the originating number of an
instrument or device from which a wire or electronic communication was
transmitted.
3. "Applicant" means a district attorney, an assistant district
attorney, and when empowered by law to conduct an investigation of or to
prosecute or participate in the prosecution of a designated crime, the
attorney general, an assistant attorney general, the deputy attorney
general in charge of the statewide organized crime task force, or an
assistant deputy attorney general of such task force.
4. "Law enforcement agency" means any agency which is empowered by law
to conduct an investigation or to make an arrest for a felony, and any
agency which is authorized by law to prosecute or participate in the
prosecution of a felony.
5. "Designated crime" means any crime included within the definition
of a "designated offense" in subdivision eight of section 700.05 of this
chapter, any criminal act as defined in subdivision one of section
460.10 of the penal law, bail jumping in the first and second degree as
defined in sections 215.57 and 215.56 of such law, or aggravated
harassment as defined in subdivisions one and two of section 240.30 of
such law.
6. "Justice" means justice as defined in subdivision four of section
700.05 of this chapter.
Pen register and trap and trace authorizations; in general.
Under circumstances prescribed in this article, a justice may issue an
order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device
upon ex parte application of an applicant who is authorized by law to
investigate, prosecute or participate in the prosecution of the
designated crimes which are the subject of the application.
Orders authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and
trace device; when issuable.
An order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace
device may issue only:
1. Upon an appropriate application made in conformity with this
article; and
2. Upon a determination that an application sets forth specific,
articulable facts, warranting the applicant's reasonable suspicion that
a designated crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed and
demonstrating that the information likely to be obtained by use of a pen
register or trap and trace device is or will be relevant to an ongoing
criminal investigation of such designated crime.
Application for an order authorizing the use of a pen register
or a trap and trace device.
1. An ex parte application for an order or an extension of an order
authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device must be
made to a justice in writing, and must be subscribed and sworn to by the
applicant.
2. The application must contain:
(a) The identity of the applicant and the identity of the law
enforcement agency conducting the investigation; and
(b) A statement of facts and circumstances sufficient to justify the
applicant's belief that an order authorizing the use of a pen register
or a trap and trace device should be issued, including (i) a statement
of the specific facts on the basis of which the applicant reasonably
suspects that the designated crime has been, is being, or is about to be
committed and demonstrating that the information likely to be obtained
by use of a pen register or a trap and trace device is or will be
relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation of such designated
offense, (ii) the identity, if known, of the person to whom is leased or
in whose name is listed the telephone line to which the pen register or
trap and trace device is to be attached, (iii) the identity, if known,
of the person who is the subject of the criminal investigation, (iv) the
number and, if known, the physical location of the telephone line to
which the pen register or trap and trace device is to be attached and,
in the case of a trap and trace device, the geographic limits of the
trap and trace order, and (v) a statement of the designated crime or
crimes to which the information likely to be obtained by the use of the
pen register or trap and trace device relates; and
(c) A statement of the period of time for which the authorization for
the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device is required; and
(d) A statement of the facts concerning all previous applications,
known to the applicant, for an order authorizing the use of a pen
register or a trap and trace device involving any of the same persons or
facilities specified in the application, and the action taken by the
justice on each such application.
3. Allegations of fact in the application may be based either upon the
personal knowledge of the applicant or upon information and belief. If
the applicant personally knows the facts alleged, it must be so stated.
If the facts stated in the application are derived in whole or in part
from the statements of persons other than the applicant, the sources of
such facts must be either disclosed or described.
Orders authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and
trace device; determination of application.
1. If the justice determines on the basis of the facts submitted by
the applicant that grounds exist for the issue of an order authorizing
the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device pursuant to section
705.10 of this article, the justice shall grant the application and
issue an order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace
device, in accordance with subdivision three of this section.
2. If the application does not conform to section 705.15 of this
article, or if the justice is not satisfied that grounds exist for the
issuance of an order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and
trace device, the application must be denied.
3. An order issued under this section must contain:
(a) the name of the applicant, date of issuance, and the subscription
and title of the issuing justice; and
(b) the identity, if known, of the person to whom is leased or in
whose name is listed the telephone line to which the pen register or
trap and trace device is to be attached; and
(c) the identity, if known, of the person who is the subject of the
criminal investigation; and
(d) the number and, if known, the physical location of the telephone
line to which the pen register or trap and trace device is to be
attached and, in the case of a trap and trace device, the geographic
limits of the trap and trace order; and
(e) a statement of the designated crime or crimes to which the
information likely to be obtained by the pen register or trap and trace
device relates.
4. An order issued under this section shall direct, upon the request
of the applicant, the furnishing of information, facilities, and
technical assistance necessary to accomplish the installation of the pen
register or trap and trace device under section 705.25 of this article.
Pen register or trap and trace device orders; time period and
extensions.
1. An order issued under this section shall authorize the
installation and use of a pen register or a trap and trace device for a
period not to exceed sixty days.
2. Extensions of such an order may be granted, but only upon an
application for an order under section 705.05 of this article and upon
the judicial finding required by subdivision one of section 705.10 of
this article. The period of extension shall be for a period not to
exceed sixty days.
Nondisclosure of existence of pen register or a trap and trace
device.
An order authorizing or approving the installation and use of a pen
register or a trap and trace device shall direct that:
1. the order be sealed until otherwise ordered by the court; and
2. the person owning or leasing the line to which the pen register or
a trap and trace device is attached, or who has been ordered by the
court to provide assistance to the applicant, not disclose the existence
of the pen register or trap and trace device or the existence of the
investigation to the listed subscriber, or to any other person, unless
or until otherwise ordered by the court.
Assistance in installation and use of a pen register or a trap
and trace device.
1. Upon the request of an applicant authorized to use a pen register
under this article, a provider of a wire or electronic communication
service, landlord, custodian, or other person shall furnish such
applicant, or his agent, forthwith all information, facilities and
technical assistance necessary to accomplish the installation of the pen
register unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the
services that the person so ordered by the court accords the party with
respect to whom the installation and use is to take place, if such
assistance is directed by a court order as provided in section 705.10 of
this article.
2. Upon the request of an applicant authorized to receive the results
of a trap and trace device under this article, a provider of a wire or
electronic communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person
shall install such device forthwith on the appropriate line and shall
furnish such applicant forthwith all information, facilities and
technical assistance including installation and operation of the device
unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that
the person so ordered by the court accords the party with respect to
whom the installation and use is to take place, if such installation and
assistance is directed by the court order as provided in section 705.10
of this article. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the results of
the trap and trace device shall be furnished to the applicant, or his
agent, at reasonable intervals during regular business hours for the
duration of the order.
3. A provider of a wire or electronic communication service,
landlord, custodian, or other person who furnishes facilities or
technical assistance pursuant to this section shall be reasonably
compensated for such reasonable expenses incurred in providing such
facilities and assistance.
4. No cause of action shall lie in any court against any provider of a
wire or electronic communication service, its officers, employees,
agents or other specified persons for providing information, facilities
or assistance in accordance with the terms of a court order under this
article. A good faith reliance by a provider of a wire or electronic
communication service upon the validity of a court order issued pursuant
to this article is a complete defense against any civil cause of action
or criminal action based entirely on a failure to comply with this
article.
ARTICLE 710 Motion to Suppress Evidence
Motion to suppress evidence; definitions of terms.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following
meanings:
1. "Defendant" means a person who has been charged by an accusatory
instrument with the commission of an offense.
2. "Evidence," when referring to matter in the possession of or
available to a prosecutor, means any tangible property or potential
testimony which may be offered in evidence in a criminal action.
3. "Potential testimony" means information or factual knowledge of a
person who is or may be available as a witness.
4. "Eavesdropping" means "wiretapping", "mechanical overhearing of a
conversation," or "intercepting or accessing of an electronic
communication", as those terms are defined in section 250.00 of the
penal law.
5. "Aggrieved." An "aggrieved person" includes, but is in no wise
limited to, an "aggrieved person" as defined in subdivision two of
section forty-five hundred six of the civil practice law and rules.
6. "Video surveillance" has the meaning given to that term by section
700.05 of this chapter.
7. "Pen register" and "trap and trace device" have the meanings given
to those terms by subdivisions one and two respectively of section
705.00 of this chapter.
Motion to suppress evidence; in general; grounds for.
Upon motion of a defendant who (a) is aggrieved by unlawful or
improper acquisition of evidence and has reasonable cause to believe
that such may be offered against him in a criminal action, or (b) claims
that improper identification testimony may be offered against him in a
criminal action, a court may, under circumstances prescribed in this
article, order that such evidence be suppressed or excluded upon the
ground that it:
1. Consists of tangible property obtained by means of an unlawful
search and seizure under circumstances precluding admissibility thereof
in a criminal action against such defendant; or
2. Consists of a record or potential testimony reciting or describing
declarations, conversations, or other communications overheard,
intercepted, accessed, or recorded by means of eavesdropping, or
observations made by means of video surveillance, obtained under
circumstances precluding admissibility thereof in a criminal action
against such defendant; or
3. Consists of a record or potential testimony reciting or describing
a statement of such defendant involuntarily made, within the meaning of
section 60.45; or
4. Was obtained as a result of other evidence obtained in a manner
described in subdivisions one, two and three; or
5. Consists of a chemical test of the defendant's blood administered
in violation of the provisions of subdivision three of section eleven
hundred ninety-four of the vehicle and traffic law, subdivision eight of
section forty-nine-a of the navigation law, subdivision seven of section
25.24 of the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, or any
other applicable law; or
6. Consists of potential testimony regarding an observation of the
defendant either at the time or place of the commission of the offense
or upon some other occasion relevant to the case, which potential
testimony would not be admissible upon the prospective trial of such
charge owing to an improperly made previous identification of the
defendant or of a pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video
recorded reproduction of the defendant by the prospective witness. A
claim that the previous identification of the defendant or of a
pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded
reproduction of the defendant by a prospective witness did not comply
with paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section 60.25 of this chapter
or with the protocol promulgated in accordance with subdivision
twenty-one of section eight hundred thirty-seven of the executive law
shall not constitute a legal basis to suppress evidence pursuant to this
subdivision. A claim that a public servant failed to comply with
paragraph (c) of subdivision one of section 60.25 of this chapter or of
subdivision twenty-one of section eight hundred thirty-seven of the
executive law shall neither expand nor limit the rights an accused
person may derive under the constitution of this state or of the United
States.
7. Consists of information obtained by means of a pen register or trap
and trace device installed or used in violation of the provisions of
article seven hundred five of this chapter.
Motion to suppress evidence; notice to defendant of intention
to offer evidence.
1. Whenever the people intend to offer at a trial (a) evidence of a
statement made by a defendant to a public servant, which statement if
involuntarily made would render the evidence thereof suppressible upon
motion pursuant to subdivision three of section 710.20, or (b) testimony
regarding an observation of the defendant either at the time or place of
the commission of the offense or upon some other occasion relevant to
the case, to be given by a witness who has previously identified him or
her or a pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded
reproduction of him or her as such, they must serve upon the defendant a
notice of such intention, specifying the evidence intended to be
offered.
2. Such notice must be served within fifteen days after arraignment
and before trial, and upon such service the defendant must be accorded
reasonable opportunity to move before trial, pursuant to subdivision one
of section 710.40, to suppress the specified evidence. For good cause
shown, however, the court may permit the people to serve such notice,
thereafter and in such case it must accord the defendant reasonable
opportunity thereafter to make a suppression motion.
3. In the absence of service of notice upon a defendant as prescribed
in this section, no evidence of a kind specified in subdivision one may
be received against him upon trial unless he has, despite the lack of
such notice, moved to suppress such evidence and such motion has been
denied and the evidence thereby rendered admissible as prescribed in
subdivision two of section 710.70.
Motion to suppress evidence; when made and determined.
1. A motion to suppress evidence must be made after the commencement
of the criminal action in which such evidence is allegedly about to be
offered, and, except as otherwise provided in section 710.30 and in
subdivision two of this section, it must be made within the period
provided in subdivision one of section 255.20.
2. The motion may be made for the first time when, owing to
unawareness of facts constituting the basis thereof or to other factors,
the defendant did not have reasonable opportunity to make the motion
previously, or when the evidence which he seeks to suppress is of a kind
specified in section 710.30 and he was not served by the people, as
provided in said section 710.30, with a pre-trial notice of intention to
offer such evidence at the trial.
3. When the motion is made before trial, the trial may not be
commenced until determination of the motion.
4. If after a pre-trial determination and denial of the motion the
court is satisfied, upon a showing by the defendant, that additional
pertinent facts have been discovered by the defendant which he could not
have discovered with reasonable diligence before the determination of
the motion, it may permit him to renew the motion before trial or, if
such was not possible owing to the time of the discovery of the alleged
new facts, during trial.
Motion to suppress evidence; in what courts made.
1. The particular courts in which motions to suppress evidence must
be made are as follows:
(a) If an indictment is pending in a superior court, or if the
defendant has been held by a local criminal court for the action of a
grand jury, the motion must be made in the superior court in which such
indictment is pending or which impaneled or will impanel such grand
jury. If the superior court which will impanel such grand jury is the
supreme court, the motion may, in the alternative, be made in the county
court of the county in which the action is pending;
(b) If a currently undetermined felony complaint is pending in a
local criminal court, the motion must be made in the superior court
which would have trial jurisdiction of the offense or offenses charged
were an indictment therefor to result;
(c) If an information, a simplified information, a prosecutor's
information or a misdemeanor complaint is pending in a local criminal
court, the motion must be made in such court.
2. If after a motion has been made in and determined by a superior
court a local criminal court acquires trial jurisdiction of the action
by reason of an information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor
complaint filed therewith, such superior court's determination is
binding upon such local criminal court. If, however, the motion has
been made in but not yet determined by the superior court at the time of
the filing of such information, prosecutor's information or misdemeanor
complaint, the superior court may not determine the motion but must
refer it to the local criminal court of trial jurisdiction.
Motion to suppress evidence; procedure.
1. A motion to suppress evidence made before trial must be in writing
and upon reasonable notice to the people and with opportunity to be
heard. The motion papers must state the ground or grounds of the motion
and must contain sworn allegations of fact, whether of the defendant or
of another person or persons, supporting such grounds. Such allegations
may be based upon personal knowledge of the deponent or upon information
and belief, provided that in the latter event the sources of such
information and the grounds of such belief are stated. The people may
file with the court, and in such case must serve a copy thereof upon the
defendant or his counsel, an answer denying or admitting any or all of
the allegations of the moving papers.
2. The court must summarily grant the motion if:
(a) The motion papers comply with the requirements of subdivision one
and the people concede the truth of allegations of fact therein which
support the motion; or
(b) The people stipulate that the evidence sought to be suppressed
will not be offered in evidence in any criminal action or proceeding
against the defendant.
3. The court may summarily deny the motion if:
(a) The motion papers do not allege a ground constituting legal basis
for the motion; or
(b) The sworn allegations of fact do not as a matter of law support
the ground alleged; except that this paragraph does not apply where the
motion is based upon the ground specified in subdivision three or six of
section 710.20.
4. If the court does not determine the motion pursuant to subdivisions
two or three, it must conduct a hearing and make findings of fact
essential to the determination thereof. All persons giving factual
information at such hearing must testify under oath, except that unsworn
evidence pursuant to subdivision two of section 60.20 of this chapter
may also be received. Upon such hearing, hearsay evidence is admissible
to establish any material fact.
5. A motion to suppress evidence made during trial may be in writing
and may be litigated and determined on the basis of motion papers as
provided in subdivisions one through four, or it may, instead, be made
orally in open court. In the latter event, the court must, where
necessary, also conduct a hearing as provided in subdivision four, out
of the presence of the jury if any, and make findings of fact essential
to the determination of the motion.
6. Regardless of whether a hearing was conducted, the court, upon
determining the motion, must set forth on the record its findings of
fact, its conclusions of law and the reasons for its determination.
Motion to suppress evidence; orders of suppression; effects of
orders and of failure to make motion.
1. Upon granting a motion to suppress evidence, the court must order
that the evidence in question be excluded in the criminal action pending
against the defendant. When the order is based upon the ground
specified in subdivision one of section 710.20 and excludes tangible
property unlawfully taken from the defendant's possession, and when such
property is not otherwise subject to lawful retention, the court may,
upon request of the defendant, further order that such property be
restored to him.
2. An order finally denying a motion to suppress evidence may be
reviewed upon an appeal from an ensuing judgment of conviction
notwithstanding the fact that such judgment is entered upon a plea of
guilty.
3. A motion to suppress evidence made pursuant to this article is the
exclusive method of challenging the admissibility of evidence upon the
grounds specified in section 710.20, and a defendant who does not make
such a motion before or in the course of a criminal action waives his
right to judicial determination of any such contention.
Nothing contained in this article, however, precludes a defendant from
attempting to establish at a trial that evidence introduced by the
people of a pre-trial statement made by him should be disregarded by the
jury or other trier of the facts on the ground that such statement was
involuntarily made within the meaning of section 60.45. Even though the
issue of the admissibility of such evidence was not submitted to the
court, or was determined adversely to the defendant upon motion, the
defendant may adduce trial evidence and otherwise contend that the
statement was involuntarily made. In the case of a jury trial, the
court must submit such issue to the jury under instructions to disregard
such evidence upon a finding that the statement was involuntarily made.
ARTICLE 715 Destruction of Dangerous Drugs
Dangerous drugs; definition.
"Dangerous drugs" means any substance listed in schedule I, II, III,
IV or V of section thirty-three hundred six of the public health law.
Pretrial motion to destroy dangerous drugs.
1. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (b) of subdivision two
hereof a district attorney may move in a superior court for an order of
destruction of the dangerous drugs in felony cases involving the
possession or sale of such drugs.
2. A motion for an order of destruction of dangerous drugs shall be
in writing, have attached thereto a copy of the report of analysis and
shall be made in the following manner:
(a) Ex parte; where no defendants have been arrested in connection
with the seizure of such drugs and a showing is made upon affidavit that
the likelihood of any future arrest in connection therewith is
nonexistent; or
(b) Upon notice, when a defendant has been arraigned in a superior
court upon an indictment charging him with a felony involving the
possession or sale of a dangerous drug and the dangerous drugs sought to
be destroyed are material to the prosecution of said indictment.
3. When such motion is ex parte, the court may order the destruction
of all or part of the subject drugs.
4. When such motion is upon notice, further proceedings shall be had
as provided in section 715.20 hereof.
Proceedings on motion upon notice.
1. When such motion is on notice, a hearing thereon shall be held by
the court before which it is returnable not later than thirty days after
the return date and the defendant shall be present at such hearing.
2. A hearing held pursuant to this section shall be conducted and
recorded in the same manner as would be required were the witnesses
testifying at trial. The district attorney shall establish by competent
evidence the nature and quantity of the dangerous drugs which are the
subject of the motion. Each party shall have the right to call and
cross examine witnesses and to register objections and to receive
rulings of the court thereon.
3. If the court finds upon the conclusion of the hearing that neither
the prosecution nor the defendant will be prejudiced thereby it may
grant the motion and may make such order as it may deem appropriate for
the destruction of part or all of such drugs.
4. A defendant may waive such hearing and consent to the granting of
the motion and entry of an order of destruction either by sworn
affidavit or by personal appearance in court and declaration on the
record of such waiver and consent.
Orders of the court.
1. In any proceeding brought pursuant to this article, the court may
grant or deny any motion made hereunder or the relief requested therein
in whole or in part and issue any order thereon as it may deem proper
and as the interests of justice may require in order to effectuate the
provisions of this article.
2. An order of destruction of a dangerous drug issued by the court
pursuant to this article shall state the time within which the
provisions of such order are to be complied with. It shall direct the
person having custody of the drug to make provision for the destruction
thereof in the presence of at least two witnesses, at least one of whom
shall be a police officer.
Affidavit of destruction.
An affidavit attesting to the date, time, place and manner of
destruction of a dangerous drug pursuant to an order therefor and
identifying the same by reference to the report of analysis or by other
identifying number or system and the order of the court issued thereon,
shall be filed with the court by the person who destroyed the drugs and
by each of the witnesses required to be present by subdivision two of
section 715.30 of this article.
Analysis of dangerous drugs.
1. On and after September first, nineteen hundred seventy-three, in
every felony case involving the possession or sale of a dangerous drug,
the head of the agency charged with custody of such drugs, or his
designee, shall within forty-five days after receipt thereof perform or
cause to be performed an analysis of such drugs, such analysis to
include qualitative identification; weight and quantity where
appropriate.
2. Within ten days after the report of such analysis is received by
such agency, the head thereof or his designee shall forward a copy
thereof to the appropriate district attorney and inform him of the
location where the subject drugs are being held.
3. The failure to have an analysis made or to forward a copy thereof
within the time specified in subdivisions one and two of this section
shall not be deemed or construed to bar the making or granting of a
motion pursuant to this article or to the prosecution of a case
involving such drugs.
TITLE U Special Proceedings Which Replace, Suspend or Abate Criminal Actions
ARTICLE 720 Youthful Offender Procedure
Youthful offender procedure; definition of terms.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following
meanings:
1. "Youth" means a person charged with a crime alleged to have been
committed when he was at least sixteen years old and less than nineteen
years old or a person charged with being a juvenile offender as defined
in subdivision forty-two of section 1.20 of this chapter.
2. "Eligible youth" means a youth who is eligible to be found a
youthful offender. Every youth is so eligible unless:
(a) the conviction to be replaced by a youthful offender finding is
for (i) a class A-I or class A-II felony, or (ii) an armed felony as
defined in subdivision forty-one of section 1.20, except as provided in
subdivision three, or (iii) rape in the first degree, a crime formerly
defined in section 130.50 of the penal law, or the crime of aggravated
sexual abuse, except as provided in subdivision three, or
(b) such youth has previously been convicted and sentenced for a
felony, or
(c) such youth has previously been adjudicated a youthful offender
following conviction of a felony or has been adjudicated on or after
September first, nineteen hundred seventy-eight a juvenile delinquent
who committed a designated felony act as defined in the family court
act.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision two, a youth who has
been convicted of an armed felony offense or of rape in the first
degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree, or aggravated sexual
abuse is an eligible youth if the court determines that one or more of
the following factors exist: (i) mitigating circumstances that bear
directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed; or (ii) where
the defendant was not the sole participant in the crime, the defendant's
participation was relatively minor although not so minor as to
constitute a defense to the prosecution. Where the court determines that
the eligible youth is a youthful offender, the court shall make a
statement on the record of the reasons for its determination, a
transcript of which shall be forwarded to the state division of criminal
justice services, to be kept in accordance with the provisions of
subdivision three of section eight hundred thirty-seven-a of the
executive law.
4. "Youthful offender finding" means a finding, substituted for the
conviction of an eligible youth, pursuant to a determination that the
eligible youth is a youthful offender.
5. "Youthful offender sentence" means the sentence imposed upon a
youthful offender finding.
6. "Youthful offender adjudication". A youthful offender adjudication
is comprised of a youthful offender finding and the youthful offender
sentence imposed thereon and is completed by imposition and entry of the
youthful offender sentence.
Youthful offender procedure; sealing of accusatory instrument;
privacy of proceedings; preliminary instructions to jury.
1. When an accusatory instrument against an apparently eligible youth
is filed with a court, it shall be filed as a sealed instrument, though
only with respect to the public.
2. When a youth is initially arraigned upon an accusatory instrument,
such arraignment and all proceedings in the action thereafter may, in
the discretion of the court and with the defendant's consent, be
conducted in private.
3. The provisions of subdivisions one and two of this section
requiring or authorizing the accusatory instrument filed against a youth
to be sealed, and the arraignment and all proceedings in the action to
be conducted in private shall not apply in connection with a pending
charge of committing any felony offense as defined in the penal law. The
provisions of subdivision one requiring the accusatory instrument filed
against a youth to be sealed shall not apply where such youth has
previously been adjudicated a youthful offender or convicted of a crime.
4. Notwithstanding any provision in this article, a person charged
with prostitution as defined in section 230.00 of the penal law
regardless of whether such person (i) had prior to commencement of trial
or entry of a plea of guilty been convicted of a crime or found a
youthful offender, or (ii) subsequent to such conviction for
prostitution is convicted of a crime or found a youthful offender, the
provisions of subdivisions one and two of this section requiring or
authorizing the accusatory instrument filed against a youth to be
sealed, and the arraignment and all proceedings in the action to be
conducted in private shall apply.
Youthful offender determination; when and how made; procedure
thereupon.
1. Upon conviction of an eligible youth, the court must order a
pre-sentence investigation of the defendant. After receipt of a written
report of the investigation and at the time of pronouncing sentence the
court must determine whether or not the eligible youth is a youthful
offender. Such determination shall be in accordance with the following
criteria:
(a) If in the opinion of the court the interest of justice would be
served by relieving the eligible youth from the onus of a criminal
record and by not imposing an indeterminate term of imprisonment of more
than four years, the court may, in its discretion, find the eligible
youth is a youthful offender; and
(b) Where the conviction is had in a local criminal court and the
eligible youth had not prior to commencement of trial or entry of a plea
of guilty been convicted of a crime or found a youthful offender, the
court must find he is a youthful offender.
2. Where an eligible youth is convicted of two or more crimes set
forth in separate counts of an accusatory instrument or set forth in two
or more accusatory instruments consolidated for trial purposes, the
court must not find him a youthful offender with respect to any such
conviction pursuant to subdivision one of this section unless it finds
him a youthful offender with respect to all such convictions.
3. Upon determining that an eligible youth is a youthful offender, the
court must direct that the conviction be deemed vacated and replaced by
a youthful offender finding; and the court must sentence the defendant
pursuant to section 60.02 of the penal law.
4. Upon determining that an eligible youth is not a youthful offender,
the court must order the accusatory instrument unsealed and continue the
action to judgment pursuant to the ordinary rules governing criminal
prosecutions.
5. (a) An individual who was an eligible youth who was not determined
to be a youthful offender by the sentencing court may apply to the
sentencing court for a new determination after at least five years have
passed since the imposition of the sentence for which such individual
was not determined to be a youthful offender, or, if the individual was
sentenced to a period of incarceration, including a period of
incarceration imposed in conjunction with a sentence of probation, the
individual's latest release from incarceration, provided that such
individual has not been convicted of any new crime since the imposition
of such sentence.
(b) In considering whether such individual should be determined to be
a youthful offender pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the
court shall consider the following factors:
(i) whether relieving the individual from the onus of a criminal
record would facilitate rehabilitation and successful reentry and
reintegration into society;
(ii) the manner in which the crime was committed;
(iii) the role of the individual in the crime which resulted in the
conviction;
(iv) the individual's age at the time of the crime;
(v) the length of time since the crime was committed;
(vi) any mitigating circumstances at the time the crime was committed;
(vii) the individual's criminal record;
(viii) the individual's attitude toward society and respect for the
law; and
(ix) evidence of rehabilitation and demonstration of living a
productive life including, but not limited to participation in
educational and vocational programs, employment history, alcohol and
substance abuse treatment, and family and community involvement.
(c) A copy of an application filed under this subdivision shall be
served upon the district attorney of the county in which the individual
was convicted. The district attorney shall notify the court within
forty-five days if he or she objects to the application for sealing. The
court may hold a hearing on the application on its own motion or on
motion of the district attorney or the individual filing the
application. If the district attorney does not file a timely objection,
the court shall proceed forthwith.
Youthful offender adjudication; certain exemptions.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent provisions of law:
1. where the court is required to find that a person is a youthful
offender pursuant to section 170.80 of this chapter, the fact that such
person has previously been convicted of a crime or adjudicated a
youthful offender shall not prevent such person from being adjudicated a
youthful offender as required by such section; and
2. a youthful offender adjudication pursuant to section 170.80 of this
chapter shall not be considered in determining whether a person is an
eligible youth, or in determining whether to find a person a youthful
offender, in any subsequent youthful offender adjudication.
Youthful offender adjudication; post-judgment motions and
appeal.
The provisions of this chapter, governing the making and determination
of post-judgment motions and the taking and determination of appeals in
criminal cases, apply to post-judgment motions and appeals with respect
to youthful offender adjudications wherever such provisions can
reasonably be so applied.
Youthful offender adjudication; effect thereof; records.
1. A youthful offender adjudication is not a judgment of conviction
for a crime or any other offense, and does not operate as a
disqualification of any person so adjudged to hold public office or
public employment or to receive any license granted by public authority
but shall be deemed a conviction only for the purposes of transfer of
supervision and custody pursuant to section two hundred fifty-nine-m of
the executive law. A defendant for whom a youthful offender adjudication
was substituted, who was originally charged with prostitution as defined
in section 230.00 of the penal law, shall be deemed a "sexually
exploited child" as defined in subdivision one of section four hundred
forty-seven-a of the social services law and therefore shall not be
considered an adult for purposes related to the charges in the youthful
offender proceeding or a proceeding under section 170.80 of this
chapter.
2. Except where specifically required or permitted by statute or upon
specific authorization of the court, all official records and papers,
whether on file with the court, a police agency or the division of
criminal justice services, relating to a case involving a youth who has
been adjudicated a youthful offender, are confidential and may not be
made available to any person or public or private agency, other than the
designated educational official of the public or private elementary or
secondary school in which the youth is enrolled as a student provided
that such local educational official shall only have made available a
notice of such adjudication and shall not have access to any other
official records and papers, such youth or such youth's designated agent
(but only where the official records and papers sought are on file with
a court and request therefor is made to that court or to a clerk
thereof), an institution to which such youth has been committed, the
department of corrections and community supervision and a probation
department of this state that requires such official records and papers
for the purpose of carrying out duties specifically authorized by law;
provided, however, that information regarding an order of protection or
temporary order of protection issued pursuant to section 530.12 of this
chapter or a warrant issued in connection therewith may be maintained on
the statewide automated order of protection and warrant registry
established pursuant to section two hundred twenty-one-a of the
executive law during the period that such order of protection or
temporary order of protection is in full force and effect or during
which such warrant may be executed. Such confidential information may be
made available pursuant to law only for purposes of adjudicating or
enforcing such order of protection or temporary order of protection and,
where provided to a designated educational official, as defined in
section 380.90 of this chapter, for purposes related to the execution of
the student's educational plan, where applicable, successful school
adjustment and reentry into the community. Such notification shall be
kept separate and apart from such student's school records and shall be
accessible only by the designated educational official. Such
notification shall not be part of such student's permanent school record
and shall not be appended to or included in any documentation regarding
such student and shall be destroyed at such time as such student is no
longer enrolled in the school district. At no time shall such
notification be used for any purpose other than those specified in this
subdivision.
3. If a youth who has been adjudicated a youthful offender is enrolled
as a student in a public or private elementary or secondary school the
court that has adjudicated the youth as a youthful offender shall
provide notification of such adjudication to the designated educational
official of the school in which such youth is enrolled as a student.
Such notification shall be used by the designated educational official
only for purposes related to the execution of the student's educational
plan, where applicable, successful school adjustment and reentry into
the community. Such notification shall be kept separate and apart from
such student's school records and shall be accessible only by the
designated educational official. Such notification shall not be part of
such student's permanent school record and shall not be appended to or
included in any documentation regarding such student and shall be
destroyed at such time as such student is no longer enrolled in the
school district. At no time shall such notification be used for any
purpose other than those specified in this subdivision.
4. Notwithstanding subdivision two of this section, whenever a person
is adjudicated a youthful offender and the conviction that was vacated
and replaced by the youthful offender finding was for a sex offense as
that term is defined in article ten of the mental hygiene law, all
records pertaining to the youthful offender adjudication shall be
included in those records and reports that may be obtained by the
commissioner of mental health or the commissioner of developmental
disabilities, as appropriate; the case review panel; and the attorney
general pursuant to section 10.05 of the mental hygiene law.
ARTICLE 722 Proceedings Against Juvenile Offenders and Adolescent Offenders; Establishment of Youth Part and Related Procedures
Probation case plans.
1. All juvenile offenders and adolescent offenders shall be notified
of the availability of services through the local probation department.
Such services shall include the ability of the probation department to
conduct a risk and needs assessment, utilizing a validated risk
assessment tool, in order to help determine suitable and individualized
programming and referrals. Participation in such risk and needs
assessment shall be voluntary and the adolescent offender or juvenile
offender may be accompanied by counsel during any such assessment. Based
upon the assessment findings, the probation department shall refer the
adolescent offender or juvenile offender to available and appropriate
services.
2. Nothing shall preclude the probation department and the adolescent
offender or juvenile offender from entering into a voluntary service
plan which may include alcohol, substance use and mental health
treatment and services. To the extent practicable, such services shall
continue through the pendency of the action and shall further continue
where such action is removed in accordance with this article.
3. When preparing a pre-sentence investigation report of any such
adolescent offender or juvenile offender, the probation department shall
incorporate a summary of any assessment findings, referrals and progress
with respect to mitigating risk and addressing any identified needs.
4. The probation service shall not transmit or otherwise communicate
to the district attorney or the youth part any statement made by the
juvenile or adolescent offender to a probation officer. However, the
probation service may make a recommendation regarding the completion of
his or her case plan to the youth part and provide such information as
it shall deem relevant.
5. No statement made to the probation service may be admitted into
evidence at a fact-finding hearing at any time prior to a conviction.
Youth part of the superior court established.
1. The chief administrator of the courts is hereby directed to
establish, in a superior court in each county of the state, a part of
the court to be known as the youth part of the superior court for the
county in which such court presides. Judges presiding in the youth part
shall be (i) family court judges, as described in article six, section
one of the constitution, or (ii) judges of a superior court who have
been determined by the chief administrator of the courts to be qualified
to preside because of prior training and experience, including but not
limited to in juvenile delinquency proceedings in family court or
adolescent or juvenile offender proceedings in a superior court. To aid
in their work, such judges shall receive training in specialized areas,
including, but not limited to, juvenile justice, adolescent development,
custody and care of youths and effective treatment methods for reducing
unlawful conduct by youths, and shall be authorized to make appropriate
determinations within the power of such superior court with respect to
the cases of youths assigned to such part. The youth part shall have
exclusive jurisdiction in all proceedings in relation to juvenile
offenders and adolescent offenders, except as provided in this article
or article seven hundred twenty-five of this chapter.
2. The chief administrator of the courts shall also direct the
presiding justice of the appellate division, in each judicial department
of the state, to designate judges authorized by law to exercise criminal
jurisdiction to serve as accessible magistrates, for the purpose of
acting in place of the youth part for certain first appearance
proceedings involving youths, as provided by law. When designating such
magistrates, the presiding justice shall ensure that all areas of a
county are within a reasonable distance of a designated magistrate. A
judge authorized to preside as such a magistrate shall have received
training in specialized areas, including, but not limited to, juvenile
justice, adolescent development, custody and care of youths and
effective treatment methods for reducing unlawful conduct by youths.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; juvenile offender.
1. When a juvenile offender is arraigned before a youth part, the
provisions of this section shall apply. If the youth part is not in
session, the defendant shall be brought before the most accessible
magistrate designated by the appellate division of the supreme court to
act as a youth part for the purpose of making a determination whether
such juvenile shall be detained or, with the consent of the district
attorney, immediately removed to family court. If the defendant is
ordered to be detained, he or she shall be brought before the next
session of the youth part. If the defendant is not detained, he or she
shall be ordered to appear at the next session of the youth part or the
family court.
2. If the defendant waives a hearing upon the felony complaint, the
court must order that the defendant be held for the action of the grand
jury with respect to the charge or charges contained in the felony
complaint.
3. If there be a hearing, then at the conclusion of the hearing, the
youth part court must dispose of the felony complaint as follows:
(a) If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a crime for which a person under the age of sixteen is
criminally responsible, the court must order that the defendant be held
for the action of a grand jury; or
(b) If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a crime for which a person under the age of sixteen is
criminally responsible but there is reasonable cause to believe that the
defendant is a "juvenile delinquent" as defined in subdivision one of
section 301.2 of the family court act, the court must specify the act or
acts it found reasonable cause to believe the defendant did and direct
that the action be removed to the family court in accordance with the
provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this title; or
(c) If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed any criminal act, the court must dismiss the felony complaint
and discharge the defendant from custody if he is in custody, or if he
is at liberty on bail, it must exonerate the bail.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions two and three of
this section, the court shall, at the request of the district attorney,
order removal of an action against a juvenile offender to the family
court pursuant to the provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of
this title if, upon consideration of the criteria specified in
subdivision two of section 722.22 of this article, it is determined that
to do so would be in the interests of justice. Where, however, the
felony complaint charges the juvenile offender with murder in the second
degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law, rape in the first
degree as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one, paragraph (a) of
subdivision two and paragraph (a) of subdivision three of section 130.35
of the penal law, rape in the first degree as formerly defined in
subdivision one of section 130.35 of the penal law; a crime formerly
defined in subdivision one of section 130.50 of the penal law, or an
armed felony as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision forty-one of
section 1.20 of this chapter, a determination that such action be
removed to the family court shall, in addition, be based upon a finding
of one or more of the following factors: (i) mitigating circumstances
that bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was committed; or
(ii) where the defendant was not the sole participant in the crime, the
defendant's participation was relatively minor although not so minor as
to constitute a defense to the prosecution; or (iii) possible
deficiencies in proof of the crime.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision two, three, or four
of this section, if a currently undetermined felony complaint against a
juvenile offender is pending, and the defendant has not waived a hearing
pursuant to subdivision two of this section and a hearing pursuant to
subdivision three of this section has not commenced, the defendant may
move to remove the action to family court pursuant to 722.22 of this
article. The procedural rules of subdivisions one and two of section
210.45 of this chapter are applicable to a motion pursuant to this
subdivision. Upon such motion, the court shall proceed and determine the
motion as provided in section 722.22 of this article; provided, however,
that the exception provisions of paragraph (b) of subdivision one of
section 722.22 of this article shall not apply when there is not
reasonable cause to believe that the juvenile offender committed one or
more of the crimes enumerated therein, and in such event the provisions
of paragraph (a) thereof shall apply.
6. (a) If the court orders removal of the action to family court, it
shall state on the record the factor or factors upon which its
determination is based, and the court shall give its reasons for removal
in detail and not in conclusory terms.
(b) The district attorney shall state upon the record the reasons for
his consent to removal of the action to the family court where such
consent is required. The reasons shall be stated in detail and not in
conclusory terms.
(c) For the purpose of making a determination pursuant to subdivision
four or five of this section, the court may make such inquiry as it
deems necessary. Any evidence which is not legally privileged may be
introduced. If the defendant testifies, his testimony may not be
introduced against him in any future proceeding, except to impeach his
testimony at such future proceeding as inconsistent prior testimony.
(d) Where a motion for removal by the defendant pursuant to
subdivision five of this section has been denied, no further motion
pursuant to this section or section 722.22 of this article may be made
by the juvenile offender with respect to the same offense or offenses.
(e) Except as provided by paragraph (f) of this subdivision, this
section shall not be construed to limit the powers of the grand jury.
(f) Where a motion by the defendant pursuant to subdivision five of
this section has been granted, there shall be no further proceedings
against the juvenile offender in any local or superior criminal court
including the youth part of the superior court for the offense or
offenses which were the subject of the removal order.
Proceedings upon felony complaint; adolescent offender.
1. When an adolescent offender is arraigned before a youth part, the
provisions of this section shall apply. If the youth part is not in
session, the defendant shall be brought before the most accessible
magistrate designated by the appellate division of the supreme court to
act as a youth part for the purpose of making a determination whether
such adolescent offender shall be detained or, with the consent of the
district attorney, immediately removed to family court. If the defendant
is ordered to be detained, he or she shall be brought before the next
session of the youth part. If the defendant is not detained, he or she
shall be ordered to appear at the next session of the youth part, family
court or the local probation department.
2. If the defendant waives a hearing upon the felony complaint, the
court must order that the defendant be held for the action of the grand
jury with respect to the charge or charges contained in the felony
complaint.
3. If there be a hearing, then at the conclusion of the hearing, the
youth part court must dispose of the felony complaint as follows:
(a) If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony, the court must order that the defendant be held for
the action of a grand jury; or
(b) If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed a felony but there is reasonable cause to believe that the
defendant is a "juvenile delinquent" as defined in subdivision one of
section 301.2 of the family court act, the court must specify the act or
acts it found reasonable cause to believe the defendant did and direct
that the action be transferred to the family court in accordance with
the provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this title,
provided, however, notwithstanding any other provision of law, section
308.1 of the family court act shall apply to actions transferred
pursuant to this subdivision and such actions shall not be considered
removals subject to subdivision thirteen of such section 308.1; or
(c) If there is not reasonable cause to believe that the defendant
committed any criminal act, the court must dismiss the felony complaint
and discharge the defendant from custody if he is in custody, or if he
is at liberty on bail, it must exonerate the bail.
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions two and three of
this section, where the defendant is charged with a felony, other than a
class A felony defined outside article two hundred twenty of the penal
law, a violent felony defined in section 70.02 of the penal law or a
felony listed in paragraph one or two of subdivision forty-two of
section 1.20 of this chapter, except as provided in paragraph (c) of
subdivision two of section 722.23 of this article, the court shall, upon
notice from the district attorney that he or she will not file a motion
to prevent removal pursuant to section 722.23 of this article, order
transfer of an action against an adolescent offender to the family court
pursuant to the provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this
title, provided, however, notwithstanding any other provision of law,
section 308.1 of the family court act shall apply to actions transferred
pursuant to this subdivision and such actions shall not be considered
removals subject to subdivision thirteen of such section 308.1.
5. Notwithstanding subdivisions two and three of this section, at the
request of the district attorney, the court shall order removal of an
action against an adolescent offender charged with an offense listed in
paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 722.23 of this article, to
the family court pursuant to the provisions of article seven hundred
twenty-five of this title and upon consideration of the criteria
specified in subdivision two of section 722.22 of this article, it is
determined that to do so would be in the interests of justice. Where,
however, the felony complaint charges the adolescent offender with
murder in the second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal
law, rape in the first degree as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision
one, paragraph (a) of subdivision two and paragraph (a) of subdivision
three of section 130.35 of the penal law, rape in the first degree as
formerly defined in subdivision one of section 130.35 of the penal law,
a crime formerly defined in subdivision one of section 130.50 of the
penal law, or an armed felony as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision
forty-one of section 1.20 of this chapter, a determination that such
action be removed to the family court shall, in addition, be based upon
a finding of one or more of the following factors: (i) mitigating
circumstances that bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was
committed; or (ii) where the defendant was not the sole participant in
the crime, the defendant's participation was relatively minor although
not so minor as to constitute a defense to the prosecution; or (iii)
possible deficiencies in proof of the crime.
6. (a) If the court orders removal of the action to family court
pursuant to subdivision five of this section, it shall state on the
record the factor or factors upon which its determination is based, and
the court shall give its reasons for removal in detail and not in
conclusory terms.
(b) The district attorney shall state upon the record the reasons for
his consent to removal of the action to the family court where such
consent is required. The reasons shall be stated in detail and not in
conclusory terms.
(c) For the purpose of making a determination pursuant to subdivision
five the court may make such inquiry as it deems necessary. Any evidence
which is not legally privileged may be introduced. If the defendant
testifies, his testimony may not be introduced against him in any future
proceeding, except to impeach his testimony at such future proceeding as
inconsistent prior testimony.
(d) Except as provided by paragraph (e), this section shall not be
construed to limit the powers of the grand jury.
(e) Where an action against a defendant has been removed to the family
court pursuant to this section, there shall be no further proceedings
against the adolescent offender in any local or superior criminal court
including the youth part of the superior court for the offense or
offenses which were the subject of the removal order.
Motion to remove juvenile offender to family court.
1. After a motion by a juvenile offender, pursuant to subdivision five
of section 722.20 of this article, or after arraignment of a juvenile
offender upon an indictment, the court may, on motion of any party or on
its own motion:
(a) except as otherwise provided by paragraph (b) of this subdivision,
order removal of the action to the family court pursuant to the
provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this title, if, after
consideration of the factors set forth in subdivision two of this
section, the court determines that to do so would be in the interests of
justice; or
(b) with the consent of the district attorney, order removal of an
action involving an indictment charging a juvenile offender with murder
in the second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law; rape
in the first degree, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one,
paragraph (a) of subdivision two and paragraph (a) of subdivision three
of section 130.35 of the penal law; rape in the first degree as formerly
defined in subdivision one of section 130.35 of the penal law; a crime
formerly defined in subdivision one of section 130.50 of the penal law;
or an armed felony as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision forty-one
of section 1.20 of this chapter, to the family court pursuant to the
provisions of article seven hundred twenty-five of this title if the
court finds one or more of the following factors: (i) mitigating
circumstances that bear directly upon the manner in which the crime was
committed; (ii) where the defendant was not the sole participant in the
crime, the defendant's participation was relatively minor although not
so minor as to constitute a defense to the prosecution; or (iii)
possible deficiencies in the proof of the crime, and, after
consideration of the factors set forth in subdivision two of this
section, the court determined that removal of the action to the family
court would be in the interests of justice.
2. In making its determination pursuant to subdivision one of this
section the court shall, to the extent applicable, examine individually
and collectively, the following:
(a) the seriousness and circumstances of the offense;
(b) the extent of harm caused by the offense;
(c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at
trial;
(d) the history, character and condition of the defendant;
(e) the purpose and effect of imposing upon the defendant a sentence
authorized for the offense;
(f) the impact of a removal of the case to the family court on the
safety or welfare of the community;
(g) the impact of a removal of the case to the family court upon the
confidence of the public in the criminal justice system;
(h) where the court deems it appropriate, the attitude of the
complainant or victim with respect to the motion; and
(i) any other relevant fact indicating that a judgment of conviction
in the criminal court would serve no useful purpose.
3. The procedure for bringing on a motion pursuant to subdivision one
of this section, shall accord with the procedure prescribed in
subdivisions one and two of section 210.45 of this chapter. After all
papers of both parties have been filed and after all documentary
evidence, if any, has been submitted, the court must consider the same
for the purpose of determining whether the motion is determinable on the
motion papers submitted and, if not, may make such inquiry as it deems
necessary for the purpose of making a determination.
4. For the purpose of making a determination pursuant to this section,
any evidence which is not legally privileged may be introduced. If the
defendant testifies, his testimony may not be introduced against him in
any future proceeding, except to impeach his testimony at such future
proceeding as inconsistent prior testimony.
5. a. If the court orders removal of the action to family court, it
shall state on the record the factor or factors upon which its
determination is based, and, the court shall give its reasons for
removal in detail and not in conclusory terms.
b. The district attorney shall state upon the record the reasons for
his consent to removal of the action to the family court. The reasons
shall be stated in detail and not in conclusory terms.
Removal of adolescent offenders to family court.
1. (a) Following the arraignment of a defendant charged with a crime
committed when he or she was sixteen, or commencing October first, two
thousand nineteen, seventeen years of age, other than any class A felony
except for those defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law,
a violent felony defined in section 70.02 of the penal law or a felony
listed in paragraph one or two of subdivision forty-two of section 1.20
of this chapter, or an offense set forth in the vehicle and traffic law,
the court shall order the removal of the action to the family court in
accordance with the applicable provisions of article seven hundred
twenty-five of this title unless, within thirty calendar days of such
arraignment, the district attorney makes a motion to prevent removal of
the action pursuant to this subdivision. If the defendant fails to
report to the probation department as directed, the thirty day time
period shall be tolled until such time as he or she reports to the
probation department.
(b) A motion to prevent removal of an action in youth part shall be
made in writing and upon prompt notice to the defendant. The motion
shall contain allegations of sworn fact based upon personal knowledge of
the affiant, and shall indicate if the district attorney is requesting a
hearing. The motion shall be noticed to be heard promptly.
(c) The defendant shall be given an opportunity to reply. The
defendant shall be granted any reasonable request for a delay. Either
party may request a hearing on the facts alleged in the motion to
prevent removal of the action. The hearing shall be held expeditiously.
(d) The court shall deny the motion to prevent removal of the action
in youth part unless the court makes a determination upon such motion by
the district attorney that extraordinary circumstances exist that should
prevent the transfer of the action to family court.
(e) The court shall make a determination in writing or on the record
within five days of the conclusion of the hearing or submission by the
defense, whichever is later. Such determination shall include findings
of fact and to the extent practicable conclusions of law.
(f) For the purposes of this section, there shall be a presumption
against custody and case planning services shall be made available to
the defendant.
(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section 308.1 of the
family court act shall apply to all actions transferred pursuant to this
section provided, however, such cases shall not be considered removals
subject to subdivision thirteen of such section 308.1.
(h) Nothing in this subdivision shall preclude, and a court may order,
the removal of an action to family court where all parties agree or
pursuant to this chapter.
2. (a) Upon the arraignment of a defendant charged with a crime
committed when he or she was sixteen or, commencing October first, two
thousand nineteen, seventeen years of age on a class A felony, other
than those defined in article 220 of the penal law, or a violent felony
defined in section 70.02 of the penal law, the court shall schedule an
appearance no later than six calendar days from such arraignment for the
purpose of reviewing the accusatory instrument pursuant to this
subdivision. The court shall notify the district attorney and defendant
regarding the purpose of such appearance.
(b) Upon such appearance, the court shall review the accusatory
instrument and any other relevant facts for the purpose of making a
determination pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subdivision. Both
parties may be heard and submit information relevant to the
determination.
(c) The court shall order the action to proceed in accordance with
subdivision one of this section unless, after reviewing the papers and
hearing from the parties, the court determines in writing that the
district attorney proved by a preponderance of the evidence one or more
of the following as set forth in the accusatory instrument:
(i) the defendant caused significant physical injury to a person other
than a participant in the offense; or
(ii) the defendant displayed a firearm, shotgun, rifle or deadly
weapon as defined in the penal law in furtherance of such offense; or
(iii) the defendant unlawfully engaged in vaginal sexual contact, oral
sexual contact, anal sexual contact, or sexual contact as defined in
section 130.00 of the penal law.
(d) Where the court makes a determination that the action shall not
proceed in accordance with subdivision one of this section, such
determination shall be made in writing or on the record and shall
include findings of fact and to the extent practicable conclusions of
law.
(e) Nothing in this subdivision shall preclude, and the court may
order, the removal of an action to family court where all parties agree
or pursuant to this chapter.
3. Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, if at any time one
or more charges in the accusatory instrument are reduced, such that the
elements of the highest remaining charge would be removable pursuant to
subdivisions one or two of this section, then the court, sua sponte or
in response to a motion pursuant to subdivisions one or two of this
section by the defendant, shall promptly notify the parties and direct
that the matter proceed in accordance with subdivision one of this
section, provided, however, that in such instance, the district attorney
must file any motion to prevent removal within thirty days of effecting
or receiving notice of such reduction.
4. A defendant may waive review of the accusatory instrument by the
court and the opportunity for removal in accordance with this section,
provided that such waiver is made by the defendant knowingly,
voluntarily and in open court, in the presence of and with the approval
of his or her counsel and the court. An earlier waiver shall not
constitute a waiver of review and the opportunity for removal under this
section.
Applicability of chapter to actions and matters involving
juvenile offenders or adolescent offenders.
Except where inconsistent with this article, all provisions of this
chapter shall apply to all criminal actions and proceedings, and all
appeals and post-judgment motions relating or attached thereto,
involving a juvenile offender or adolescent offender.
ARTICLE 725 Removal of Proceeding Against Juvenile Offender to Family Court
Order of removal.
When a youth part directs that an action or charge is to be removed to
the family court the youth part must issue an order of removal in
accordance with this section. Such order must be as follows:
1. It must provide that the action or charge is to be removed to the
family court of the county in which such action or charge was pending,
and it must specify the section pursuant to which the removal is
authorized.
2. Where the direction is authorized pursuant to paragraph (b) of
subdivision three of sections 722.20 or 722.21 of this title, it must
specify the act or acts it found reasonable cause to believe the
defendant did.
3. Where the direction is authorized pursuant to subdivision four of
section 722.20 or section 722.21 of this title, it must specify the act
or acts it found reasonable cause to allege.
4. Where the direction is authorized pursuant to section 190.71 of
this chapter, the court shall annex to the order as part thereof a
certified copy of the grand jury request.
4-a. Where the direction is authorized pursuant to subdivision seven
of section 210.30 of this chapter, it must specify the act or acts for
which there was sufficient evidence to believe that defendant did.
5. Where the direction is authorized pursuant to section 220.10,
310.85 or 330.25 of this chapter, it must specify the act or acts for
which a plea or verdict of guilty was rendered or accepted and entered.
6. Where a securing order has not been made, the order of removal must
provide that the police officer or peace officer who made the arrest or
some other proper officer forthwith and with all reasonable speed take
the juvenile to the designated family court or, where that cannot be
done, it must provide for release or detention in the same manner as
provided for a family court proceeding pursuant to section 320.5 of the
family court act.
7. Whether or not a securing order has been made, the order of removal
must specify a date certain within ten days from the date of the order
of removal for the defendant's appearance in the family court and where
the defendant is in detention or in the custody of the sheriff that date
must be not later than the next day the family court is in session.
Unless the defendant is in detention or is in the custody of the sheriff
or unless the order of removal specifies a juvenile or adolescent
offense for which the defendant is not eligible for consideration for
adjustment under subdivision thirteen or fourteen of section 308.1 of
the family court act, the order of removal shall direct the defendant to
appear at the family court intake office of the county department of
probation for adjustment consideration; provided, however, that pursuant
to subdivision three of section 308.1 of the family court act, the fact
that the defendant is in detention or is in the custody of the sheriff
shall not preclude the probation service from adjusting the case if the
defendant is otherwise eligible for adjustment.
8. The order of removal must direct that all of the pleadings and
proceedings in the action, or a certified copy of same be transferred to
the designated family court and be delivered to and filed with the clerk
of that court. For the purposes of this subdivision the term "pleadings
and proceedings" includes the minutes of any hearing inquiry or trial
held in the action, the minutes of any grand jury proceeding and the
minutes of any plea accepted and entered.
9. The order of removal must be signed by a judge or justice of the
court that directed the removal.
Removal of action.
1. Unless the defendant is an adolescent offender who has been
directed to appear at the family court intake office of the county
department of probation for adjustment consideration in accordance with
subdivision seven of section 725.05 of this article, when an order of
removal is filed with the family court, a proceeding pursuant to article
three of the family court act must be originated. The family court
thereupon must assume jurisdiction and proceed to render such judgment
as the circumstances require, in the manner and to the extent provided
by law.
2. Upon the filing of an order of removal in a criminal court the
criminal action upon which the order is based shall be terminated, and
there shall be no further criminal proceedings in any criminal court as
defined in section 10.10 of this chapter with respect to the offense or
offenses charged in the accusatory instrument which was the subject of
removal. All further proceedings including motions and appeals shall be
in accordance with laws appertaining to the family court and for this
purpose all findings, determinations, verdicts and orders other than the
order of removal, shall be deemed to have been made by the family court.
Sealing of records.
Except where specifically required or permitted by statute or upon
specific authorization of the court that directed removal of an action
to the family court all official records and papers of the action up to
and including the order of removal, whether on file with the court, a
police agency or the division of criminal justice services, are
confidential and must not be made available to any person or public or
private agency, provided however that availability of copies of any such
records and papers on file with the family court shall be governed by
provisions that apply to family court records, and further provided that
all official records and papers of the action shall be included in those
records and reports that may be obtained upon request by the
commissioner of mental health or commissioner of the office for people
with developmental disabilities, as appropriate; the case review panel;
and the attorney general pursuant to section 10.05 of the mental hygiene
law.
Record of certain actions removed.
1. The provisions of this section shall apply in any case where an
order of removal to the family court is entered pursuant to a direction
authorized by article 722 of this title, or subparagraph (iii) of
paragraph (g) of subdivision five of section 220.10 of this chapter, or
section 330.25 of this chapter.
2. When such an action is removed the court that directed the removal
must cause the following additional records to be filed with the clerk
of the county court or in the city of New York with the clerk of the
supreme court of the county wherein the action was pending and with the
division of criminal justice services:
(a) A certified copy of the order of removal;
(b) Where the direction is one authorized by subparagraph (iii) of
paragraph (g) of subdivision five of section 220.10 or section 330.25 of
this chapter, a copy of the minutes of the plea of guilty, including the
minutes of the memorandum submitted by the district attorney and the
court; and
(c) In addition to the records specified in this subdivision, such
further statement or submission of additional information pertaining to
the proceeding in criminal court in accordance with standards
established by the commissioner of the division of criminal justice
services, subject to the provisions of subdivision three of this
section.
3. It shall be the duty of said clerk to maintain a separate file for
copies of orders and minutes filed pursuant to this section. Upon
receipt of such orders and minutes the clerk must promptly delete such
portions as would identify the defendant, but the clerk shall
nevertheless maintain a separate confidential system to enable
correlation of the documents so filed with identification of the
defendant. After making such deletions the orders and minutes shall be
placed within the file and must be available for public inspection.
Information permitting correlation of any such record with the identity
of any defendant shall not be divulged to any person except upon order
of a justice of the supreme court based upon a finding that the public
interest or the interests of justice warrant disclosure in a particular
cause for a particular case or for a particular purpose or use.
ARTICLE 730 Mental Disease or Defect Excluding Fitness to Proceed
Fitness to proceed; definitions.
As used in this article, the following terms have the following
meanings:
1. "Incapacitated person" means a defendant who as a result of mental
disease or defect lacks capacity to understand the proceedings against
him or to assist in his own defense.
2. "Order of examination" means an order issued to an appropriate
director by a criminal court wherein a criminal action is pending
against a defendant or by a court evaluating the capacity of an alleged
violator in a parole revocation proceeding pursuant to subparagraph
(xii) of paragraph (f) of subdivision three of section two hundred
fifty-nine-i of the executive law, or by a family court pursuant to
section 322.1 of the family court act wherein a juvenile delinquency
proceeding is pending against a juvenile, directing that such person be
examined for the purpose of determining if he is an incapacitated
person.
3. "Commissioner" means the state commissioner of mental health or the
state commissioner of the office for people with developmental
disabilities.
4. "Director" means (a) the director of a state hospital operated by
the office of mental health or the director of a developmental center
operated by the office for people with developmental disabilities, or
(b) the director of a hospital operated by any local government of the
state that has been certified by the commissioner as having adequate
facilities to examine a defendant to determine if he is an incapacitated
person, or (c) the director of community mental health services.
5. "Qualified psychiatrist" means a physician who:
(a) is a diplomate of the American board of psychiatry and neurology
or is eligible to be certified by that board; or,
(b) is certified by the American osteopathic board of neurology and
psychiatry or is eligible to be certified by that board.
6. "Certified psychologist" means a person who is registered as a
certified psychologist under article one hundred fifty-three of the
education law.
7. "Psychiatric examiner" means a qualified psychiatrist or a
certified psychologist who has been designated by a director to examine
a defendant pursuant to an order of examination.
8. "Examination report" means a report made by a psychiatric examiner
wherein he sets forth his opinion as to whether the defendant is or is
not an incapacitated person, the nature and extent of his examination
and, if he finds that the defendant is an incapacitated person, his
diagnosis and prognosis and a detailed statement of the reasons for his
opinion by making particular reference to those aspects of the
proceedings wherein the defendant lacks capacity to understand or to
assist in his own defense. The state administrator and the commissioner
must jointly adopt the form of the examination report; and the state
administrator shall prescribe the number of copies thereof that must be
submitted to the court by the director.
9. "Appropriate institution" means: (a) a hospital operated by the
office of mental health or a developmental center operated by the office
for people with developmental disabilities; or (b) a hospital licensed
by the department of health which operates a psychiatric unit licensed
by the office of mental health, as determined by the commissioner
provided, however, that any such hospital that is not operated by the
state shall qualify as an "appropriate institution" only pursuant to the
terms of an agreement between the commissioner and the hospital. Nothing
in this article shall be construed as requiring a hospital to consent to
providing care and treatment to an incapacitated person at such
hospital.
Fitness to proceed; generally.
1. The appropriate director to whom a criminal court issues an order
of examination must be determined in accordance with rules jointly
adopted by the judicial conference and the commissioner. Upon receipt
of an examination order, the director must designate two qualified
psychiatric examiners, of whom he may be one, to examine the defendant
to determine if he is an incapacitated person. In conducting their
examination, the psychiatric examiners may employ any method which is
accepted by the medical profession for the examination of persons
alleged to be mentally ill or mentally defective. The court may
authorize a psychiatrist or psychologist retained by the defendant to be
present at such examination.
2. When the defendant is not in custody at the time a court issues an
order of examination, because he was theretofore released on bail or on
his own recognizance, the court may direct that the examination be
conducted on an out-patient basis, and at such time and place as the
director shall designate. If, however, the director informs the court
that hospital confinement of the defendant is necessary for an effective
examination, the court may direct that the defendant be confined in a
hospital designated by the director until the examination is completed.
3. When the defendant is in custody at the time a court issues an
order of examination, the examination must be conducted at the place
where the defendant is being held in custody. If, however, the director
determines that hospital confinement of the defendant is necessary for
an effective examination, the sheriff must deliver the defendant to a
hospital designated by the director and hold him in custody therein,
under sufficient guard, until the examination is completed.
4. Hospital confinement under subdivisions two and three shall be for
a period not exceeding thirty days, except that, upon application of the
director, the court may authorize confinement for an additional period
not exceeding thirty days if it is satisfied that a longer period is
necessary to complete the examination. During the period of hospital
confinement, the physician in charge of the hospital may administer or
cause to be administered to the defendant such emergency psychiatric,
medical or other therapeutic treatment as in his judgment should be
administered.
5. Each psychiatric examiner, after he has completed his examination
of the defendant, must promptly prepare an examination report and submit
it to the director. If the psychiatric examiners are not unanimous in
their opinion as to whether the defendant is or is not an incapacitated
person, the director must designate another qualified psychiatric
examiner to examine the defendant to determine if he is an incapacitated
person. Upon receipt of the examination reports, the director must
submit them to the court that issued the order of examination. The
court must furnish a copy of the reports to counsel for the defendant
and to the district attorney.
6. When a defendant is subjected to examination pursuant to an order
issued by a criminal court in accordance with this article, any
statement made by him for the purpose of the examination or treatment
shall be inadmissible in evidence against him in any criminal action on
any issue other than that of his mental condition, but such statement is
admissible upon that issue whether or not it would otherwise be deemed a
privileged communication.
7. A psychiatric examiner is entitled to his reasonable traveling
expenses, a fee of fifty dollars for each examination of a defendant and
a fee of fifty dollars for each appearance at a court hearing or trial
but not exceeding two hundred dollars in fees for examination and
testimony in any one case; except that if such psychiatric examiner be
an employee of the state of New York he shall be entitled only to
reasonable traveling expenses, unless such psychiatric examiner makes
the examination or appears at a court hearing or trial outside his hours
of state employment in a county in which the director of community
mental health services certifies to the fiscal officer thereof that
there is a shortage of qualified psychiatrists available to conduct
examinations under the criminal procedure law in such county, in which
event he shall be entitled to the foregoing fees and reasonable
traveling expenses. Such fees and traveling expenses and the costs of
sending a defendant to another place of detention or to a hospital for
examination, of his maintenance therein and of returning him shall, when
approved by the court, be a charge of the county in which the defendant
is being tried.
Fitness to proceed; order of examination.
1. At any time after a defendant is arraigned upon an accusatory
instrument other than a felony complaint and before the imposition of
sentence, or at any time after a defendant is arraigned upon a felony
complaint and before he is held for the action of the grand jury, the
court wherein the criminal action is pending must issue an order of
examination when it is of the opinion that the defendant may be an
incapacitated person.
2. When the examination reports submitted to the court show that each
psychiatric examiner is of the opinion that the defendant is not an
incapacitated person, the court may, on its own motion, conduct a
hearing to determine the issue of capacity, and it must conduct a
hearing upon motion therefor by the defendant or by the district
attorney. If no motion for a hearing is made, the criminal action
against the defendant must proceed. If, following a hearing, the court
is satisfied that the defendant is not an incapacitated person, the
criminal action against him must proceed; if the court is not so
satisfied, it must issue a further order of examination directing that
the defendant be examined by different psychiatric examiners designated
by the director.
3. When the examination reports submitted to the court show that each
psychiatric examiner is of the opinion that the defendant is an
incapacitated person, the court may, on its own motion, conduct a
hearing to determine the issue of capacity and it must conduct such
hearing upon motion therefor by the defendant or by the district
attorney.
4. When the examination reports submitted to the court show that the
psychiatric examiners are not unanimous in their opinion as to whether
the defendant is or is not an incapacitated person, or when the
examination reports submitted to the superior court show that the
psychiatric examiners are not unanimous in their opinion as to whether
the defendant is or is not a dangerous incapacitated person, the court
must conduct a hearing to determine the issue of capacity or
dangerousness.
Fitness to proceed; local criminal court accusatory instrument.
1. When a local criminal court, following a hearing conducted pursuant
to subdivision three or four of section 730.30 of this article, is
satisfied that the defendant is not an incapacitated person, the
criminal action against him or her must proceed. If it is satisfied that
the defendant is an incapacitated person, or if no motion for such a
hearing is made, such court must issue a final or temporary order of
observation committing him or her to the custody of the commissioner for
care and treatment in an appropriate institution for a period not to
exceed ninety days from the date of the order, provided, however, that
the commissioner may designate an appropriate hospital for placement of
a defendant for whom a final order of observation has been issued, where
such hospital is licensed by the office of mental health and has agreed
to accept, upon referral by the commissioner, defendants subject to
final orders of observation issued under this subdivision. When a local
criminal court accusatory instrument other than a felony complaint has
been filed against the defendant, such court must issue a final order of
observation. When a felony complaint has been filed against the
defendant, such court must issue a temporary order of observation
committing him or her to the custody of the commissioner for care and
treatment in an appropriate institution or, upon the consent of the
district attorney, committing him or her to the custody of the
commissioner for care and treatment on an out-patient basis, for a
period not to exceed ninety days from the date of such order, except
that, with the consent of the district attorney, it may issue a final
order of observation. Upon the issuance of a final order of observation,
the district attorney shall immediately transmit to the commissioner, in
a manner intended to protect the confidentiality of the information, a
list of names and contact information of persons who may reasonably be
expected to be the victim of any assault or any violent felony offense,
as defined in the penal law, or any offense listed in section 530.11 of
this chapter which would be carried out by the committed person;
provided that the person who reasonably may be expected to be a victim
does not need to be a member of the same family or household as the
committed person.
2. (a) When a local criminal court has issued a final order of
observation, it must:
(1) order the appropriate institution designated by the commissioner
to provide for discharge planning pursuant to subdivisions (f) and (g)
of section 29.15 of the mental hygiene law, if applicable, which shall
include referrals to the single point of access or other outpatient
providers, provided such referrals are clinically indicated. Nothing in
this subparagraph shall be construed to require a referral to services
for which the defendant is not eligible or where otherwise prohibited by
law, including where patient consent is required and has not been
provided; and
(2) dismiss the accusatory instrument filed in such court against the
defendant and such dismissal constitutes a bar to any further
prosecution of the charge or charges contained in such accusatory
instrument.
(b) When the defendant is in the custody of the commissioner pursuant
to a final order of observation, the commissioner or such commissioner's
designee, which may include the director of an appropriate institution,
immediately upon the discharge of the defendant, must certify to such
court that the commissioner or such commissioner's designee has complied
with the notice provisions set forth in paragraph (a) of subdivision six
of section 730.60 of this article and the referral provisions set forth
in paragraph (a) of this subdivision. When the defendant is in the
custody of the commissioner at the expiration of the period prescribed
in a temporary order of observation, the proceedings in the local
criminal court that issued such order shall terminate for all purposes
and the commissioner must promptly certify to such court and to the
appropriate district attorney that the defendant was in the
commissioner's custody on such expiration date. Upon receipt of such
certification, the court must dismiss the felony complaint filed against
the defendant.
3. When a local criminal court has issued an order of examination or a
temporary order of observation, and when the charge or charges contained
in the accusatory instrument are subsequently presented to a grand jury,
such grand jury need not hear the defendant pursuant to section 190.50
unless, upon application by defendant to the superior court that
impaneled such grand jury, the superior court determines that the
defendant is not an incapacitated person.
4. When an indictment is filed against a defendant after a local
criminal court has issued an order of examination and before it has
issued a final or temporary order of observation, the defendant must be
promptly arraigned upon the indictment, and the proceedings in the local
criminal court shall thereupon terminate for all purposes. The district
attorney must notify the local criminal court of such arraignment, and
such court must thereupon dismiss the accusatory instrument filed in
such court against the defendant. If the director has submitted the
examination reports to the local criminal court, such court must forward
them to the superior court in which the indictment was filed. If the
director has not submitted such reports to the local criminal court, he
must submit them to the superior court in which the indictment was
filed.
5. When an indictment is timely filed against the defendant after the
issuance of a temporary order of observation or after the expiration of
the period prescribed in such order, the superior court in which such
indictment is filed must direct the sheriff to take custody of the
defendant at the institution in which he is confined and bring him
before the court for arraignment upon the indictment. After the
defendant is arraigned upon the indictment, such temporary order of
observation or any order issued pursuant to the mental hygiene law after
the expiration of the period prescribed in the temporary order of
observation shall be deemed nullified. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, an indictment filed in a superior court against a
defendant for a crime charged in the felony complaint is not timely for
the purpose of this subdivision if it is filed more than six months
after the expiration of the period prescribed in a temporary order of
observation issued by a local criminal court wherein such felony
complaint was pending. An untimely indictment must be dismissed by the
superior court unless such court is satisfied that there was good cause
for the delay in filing such indictment.
Fitness to proceed; indictment.
1. When a superior court, following a hearing conducted pursuant to
subdivision three or four of section 730.30 of this article, is
satisfied that the defendant is not an incapacitated person, the
criminal action against him or her must proceed. If it is satisfied that
the defendant is an incapacitated person, or if no motion for such a
hearing is made, it must adjudicate him or her an incapacitated person,
and must issue a final order of observation or an order of commitment.
When the indictment does not charge a felony or when the defendant has
been convicted of an offense other than a felony, such court (a) must
issue a final order of observation committing the defendant to the
custody of the commissioner for care and treatment in an appropriate
institution for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date of such
order, provided, however, that the commissioner may designate an
appropriate hospital for placement of a defendant for whom a final order
of observation has been issued, where such hospital is licensed by the
office of mental health and has agreed to accept, upon referral by the
commissioner, defendants subject to final orders of observation issued
under this subdivision, and (b) must dismiss the indictment filed in
such court against the defendant, and such dismissal constitutes a bar
to any further prosecution of the charge or charges contained in such
indictment. Upon the issuance of a final order of observation, the
district attorney shall immediately transmit to the commissioner, in a
manner intended to protect the confidentiality of the information, a
list of names and contact information of persons who may reasonably be
expected to be the victim of any assault or any violent felony offense,
as defined in the penal law, or any offense listed in section 530.11 of
this chapter which would be carried out by the committed person;
provided that the person who reasonably may be expected to be a victim
does not need to be a member of the same family or household as the
committed person. When the indictment charges a felony or when the
defendant has been convicted of a felony, it must issue an order of
commitment committing the defendant to the custody of the commissioner
for care and treatment in an appropriate institution or, upon the
consent of the district attorney, committing him or her to the custody
of the commissioner for care and treatment on an out-patient basis, for
a period not to exceed one year from the date of such order. Upon the
issuance of an order of commitment, the court must exonerate the
defendant's bail if he or she was previously at liberty on bail;
provided, however, that exoneration of bail is not required when a
defendant is committed to the custody of the commissioner for care and
treatment on an out-patient basis. When the defendant is in the custody
of the commissioner pursuant to a final order of observation, the
commissioner or his or her designee, which may include the director of
an appropriate institution, immediately upon the discharge of the
defendant, must certify to such court that he or she has complied with
the notice provisions set forth in paragraph (a) of subdivision six of
section 730.60 of this article.
2. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner immediately
prior to the expiration of the period prescribed in a temporary order of
commitment and the superintendent of the institution wherein the
defendant is confined is of the opinion that the defendant continues to
be an incapacitated person, such superintendent must apply to the court
that issued such order for an order of retention. Such application must
be made within sixty days prior to the expiration of such period on
forms that have been jointly adopted by the judicial conference and the
commissioner. The superintendent must give written notice of the
application to the defendant and to the mental hygiene legal service.
Upon receipt of such application, the court may, on its own motion,
conduct a hearing to determine the issue of capacity, and it must
conduct such hearing if a demand therefor is made by the defendant or
the mental hygiene legal service within ten days from the date that
notice of the application was given them. If, at the conclusion of a
hearing conducted pursuant to this subdivision, the court is satisfied
that the defendant is no longer an incapacitated person, the criminal
action against him must proceed. If it is satisfied that the defendant
continues to be an incapacitated person, or if no demand for a hearing
is made, the court must adjudicate him an incapacitated person and must
issue an order of retention which shall authorize continued custody of
the defendant by the commissioner for a period not to exceed one year.
3. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner immediately
prior to the expiration of the period prescribed in the first order of
retention, the procedure set forth in subdivision two shall govern the
application for and the issuance of any subsequent order of retention,
except that any subsequent orders of retention must be for periods not
to exceed two years each; provided, however, that the aggregate of the
periods prescribed in the temporary order of commitment, the first order
of retention and all subsequent orders of retention must not exceed
two-thirds of the authorized maximum term of imprisonment for the
highest class felony charged in the indictment or for the highest class
felony of which he was convicted.
4. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner at the
expiration of the authorized period prescribed in the last order of
retention, the criminal action pending against him in the superior court
that issued such order shall terminate for all purposes, and the
commissioner must promptly certify to such court and to the appropriate
district attorney that the defendant was in his custody on such
expiration date. Upon receipt of such certification, the court must
dismiss the indictment, and such dismissal constitutes a bar to any
further prosecution of the charge or charges contained in such
indictment.
5. When, on the effective date of this subdivision, any defendant
remains in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to an order issued
under former code of criminal procedure section six hundred sixty-two-b,
the superintendent or director of the institution where such defendant
is confined shall, if he believes that the defendant continues to be an
incapacitated person, apply forthwith to a court of record in the county
where the institution is located for an order of retention. The
procedures for obtaining any order pursuant to this subdivision shall be
in accordance with the provisions of subdivisions two, three and four of
this section, except that the period of retention pursuant to the first
order obtained under this subdivision shall be for not more than one
year and any subsequent orders of retention must be for periods not to
exceed two years each; provided, however, that the aggregate of the time
spent in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to any order issued in
accordance with the provisions of former code of criminal procedure
section six hundred sixty-two-b and the periods prescribed by the first
order obtained under this subdivision and all subsequent orders of
retention must not exceed two-thirds of the authorized maximum term of
imprisonment for the highest class felony charged in the indictment or
the highest class felony of which he was convicted.
Fitness to proceed; procedure following custody by
commissioner.
1. When a local criminal court issues a final or temporary order of
observation or an order of commitment, it must forward such order and a
copy of the examination reports and the accusatory instrument to the
commissioner, and, if available, a copy of the pre-sentence report. Upon
receipt thereof, the commissioner must designate an appropriate
institution operated by the department of mental hygiene in which the
defendant is to be placed, provided, however, that the commissioner may
designate an appropriate hospital for placement of a defendant for whom
a final order of observation has been issued, where such hospital is
licensed by the office of mental health and has agreed to accept, upon
referral by the commissioner, defendants subject to final orders of
observation issued under this subdivision. The sheriff must hold the
defendant in custody pending such designation by the commissioner, and
when notified of the designation, the sheriff must deliver the defendant
to the superintendent of such institution. The superintendent must
promptly inform the appropriate director of the mental hygiene legal
service of the defendant's admission to such institution. If a defendant
escapes from the custody of the commissioner, the escape shall interrupt
the period prescribed in any order of observation, commitment or
retention, and such interruption shall continue until the defendant is
returned to the custody of the commissioner.
2. Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions four and five, when a
defendant is in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to a temporary
order of observation or an order of commitment or an order of retention,
the criminal action pending against the defendant in the court that
issued such order is suspended until the superintendent of the
institution in which the defendant is confined determines that he is no
longer an incapacitated person. In that event, the court that issued
such order and the appropriate district attorney must be notified, in
writing, by the superintendent of his determination. The court must
thereupon proceed in accordance with the provisions of subdivision two
of section 730.30 of this chapter; provided, however, if the court is
satisfied that the defendant remains an incapacitated person, and upon
consent of all parties, the court may order the return of the defendant
to the institution in which he had been confined for such period of time
as was authorized by the prior order of commitment or order of
retention. Upon such return, the defendant shall have all rights and
privileges accorded by the provisions of this article.
3. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to
an order issued in accordance with this article, the commissioner may
transfer him to any appropriate institution operated by the department
of mental hygiene, provided, however, that the commissioner may
designate an appropriate hospital for placement of a defendant for whom
a final order of observation has been issued, where such hospital is
licensed by the office of mental health and has agreed to accept, upon
referral by the commissioner, defendants subject to final orders of
observation issued under this section. The commissioner may discharge a
defendant in his custody under a final order of observation at any time
prior to the expiration date of such order, or otherwise treat or
transfer such defendant in the same manner as if he were a patient not
in confinement under a criminal court order.
4. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to
an order of commitment or an order of retention, he may make any motion
authorized by this chapter which is susceptible of fair determination
without his personal participation. If the court denies any such motion
it must be without prejudice to a renewal thereof after the criminal
action against the defendant has been ordered to proceed. If the court
enters an order dismissing the indictment and does not direct that the
charge or charges be resubmitted to a grand jury, the court must direct
that such order of dismissal be served upon the commissioner.
5. When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner pursuant to
an order of commitment or an order of retention, the superior court that
issued such order may, upon motion of the defendant, and with the
consent of the district attorney, dismiss the indictment when the court
is satisfied that (a) the defendant is a resident or citizen of another
state or country and that he will be removed thereto upon dismissal of
the indictment, or (b) the defendant has been continuously confined in
the custody of the commissioner for a period of more than two years.
Before granting a motion under this subdivision, the court must be
further satisfied that dismissal of the indictment is consistent with
the ends of justice and that custody of the defendant by the
commissioner pursuant to an order of commitment or an order of retention
is not necessary for the protection of the public and that care and
treatment can be effectively administered to the defendant without the
necessity of such order. If the court enters an order of dismissal under
this subdivision, it must set forth in the record the reasons for such
action, and must direct that such order of dismissal be served upon the
commissioner. The dismissal of an indictment pursuant to this
subdivision constitutes a bar to any further prosecution of the charge
or charges contained in such indictment.
6. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person committed
to the custody of the commissioner pursuant to this article, or
continuously thereafter retained in such custody, shall be discharged,
released on condition or placed in any less secure facility or on any
less restrictive status, including, but not limited to vacations,
furloughs and temporary passes, unless the commissioner or his or her
designee, which may include the director of an appropriate institution,
shall deliver written notice, at least four days, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and holidays, in advance of the change of such committed
person's facility or status, or in the case of a person committed
pursuant to a final order of observation written notice upon discharge
of such committed person, to all of the following:
(1) The district attorney of the county from which such person was
committed;
(2) The superintendent of state police;
(3) The sheriff of the county where the facility is located;
(4) The police department having jurisdiction of the area where the
facility is located;
(5) Any person who may reasonably be expected to be the victim of any
assault or any violent felony offense, as defined in the penal law, or
any offense listed in section 530.11 of this part which would be carried
out by the committed person; provided that the person who reasonably may
be expected to be a victim does not need to be a member of the same
family or household as the committed person; and
(6) Any other person the court may designate.
Said notice may be given by any means reasonably calculated to give
prompt actual notice.
(b) The notice required by this subdivision shall also be given
immediately upon the departure of such committed person from the actual
custody of the commissioner or an appropriate institution, without
proper authorization. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to
impair any other right or duty regarding any notice or hearing contained
in any other provision of law.
(c) Whenever a district attorney has received the notice described in
this subdivision, and the defendant is in the custody of the
commissioner pursuant to a final order of observation or an order of
commitment, he may apply within three days of receipt of such notice to
a superior court, for an order directing a hearing to be held to
determine whether such committed person is a danger to himself or
others. Such hearing shall be held within ten days following the
issuance of such order. Such order may provide that there shall be no
further change in the committed person's facility or status until the
hearing. Upon a finding that the committed person is a danger to himself
or others, the court shall issue an order to the commissioner
authorizing retention of the committed person in the status existing at
the time notice was given hereunder, for a specified period, not to
exceed six months. The district attorney and the committed person's
attorney shall be entitled to the committed person's clinical records in
the commissioner's custody, upon the issuance of an order directing a
hearing to be held.
(d) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to impair any other
right or duty regarding any notice or hearing contained in any other
provision of law.
Fitness to proceed; procedure following termination of custody
by commissioner.
When a defendant is in the custody of the commissioner on the
expiration date of a final or temporary order of observation or an order
of commitment, or on the expiration date of the last order of retention,
or on the date an order dismissing an indictment is served upon the
commissioner, the superintendent of the institution in which the
defendant is confined may retain him for care and treatment for a period
of thirty days from such date. If the superintendent determines that the
defendant is so mentally ill or mentally defective as to require
continued care and treatment in an institution, he may, before the
expiration of such thirty day period, apply for an order of
certification in the manner prescribed in section 31.33 of the mental
hygiene law.